ZTE Blade V7 Lite
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 17 scores (from 22 reviews)
Reviews for the ZTE Blade V7 Lite
Darkness favors secret dealings! ZTE's Blade V7 Lite is an affordable mid-range smartphone with very appealing looks. Compared with its Blade V7 sister model, it is cheaper and aims to attract price-conscious buyers. However, the Lite version is equipped with a somewhat weaker SoC. Furthermore, it presented its dark side in our test.
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The ZTE Blade V7 Lite is cheap, but not quite cheerful enough to justify the savings, with poor performance and a sub-par camera.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 70% performance: 40% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Gear Open EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Factor in a chipset which offers thoroughly average performance levels and the Blade V7 Lite begins to look more like its £150/$225 price tag – despite the admittedly gorgeous metal bodywork, which is both svelte and comfortable to hold.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/07/2016
Source: What Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
A solid build quality and acceptable camera help this phone to stand out against similar budget handsets, but overall performance can feel slow and sluggish at times. If ZTE had included a slightly better processor, the Blade V7 Lite would’ve made a very attractive package. As it stands, this is just another good budget phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/03/2016
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 80% performance: 60% display: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Recombu EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For less than £10 a month on contract, the Blade V7 Lite does a good job of offering a strong set of features while keeping the cost down. You get a sturdy, attractive Android handset packed with all kinds of gesture controls, plus a solid HD display and a fingerprint sensor for extra security.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/31/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: e-media - Heft 09/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 08/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 07/21/2016
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 82% display: 65% mobility: 78%
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 4/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Blick DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/30/2016
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 58% performance: 40% display: 60% mobility: 50% workmanship: 70%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 68% price: 70% display: 65% mobility: 75% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/15/2016
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 69% price: 65% features: 65% mobility: 70% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 60% display: 70% mobility: 60% ergonomy: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Hitek FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 68% price: 80% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 80%
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/11/2016
Source: Teknokulis TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/07/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% workmanship: 75%
Source: Log.com.tr TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/06/2016
Source: Helpix RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 73%
Comment
ARM Mali-T720:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
MT6735:
64位四核的系统芯片(4个ARM Cortex-A53核心),主频最高1.5 GHz,面向低价平板电脑和智能手机。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.00": 这是常见的智能手机对角线尺寸。» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.