华硕ZenBook 14 UM431DA笔记本电脑评测：用Ryzen留下的好印象

Name: Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
Brand: Asus

美妙！

华硕的ZenBook 14用更强大的Ryzen 7给人留下了深刻的印象，但尽管风扇全力运作，仍然无法发挥其全部性能潜力。凭借其扁平化的设计，这款14英寸笔记本电脑使用方便，并且诸如集成数字键盘之类的小功能很有趣。我们的评测会告诉您ZenBook 14还有什么。

Mike Wobker, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 03/26/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Windows Laptop / Notebook AMD Ryzen (Zen)

Test device courtesy of cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T (ZenBook 14 Series)

Processor

AMD Ryzen 7 3700U 4 x 2.3 - 4 GHz, Picasso-U (Zen+)

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon RX Vega 10

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4 2400, dual-channel

Display

14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, CEC PA LM140LF-3L03, IPS, glossy: no

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A, 512 GB

, 430 GB free

Soundcard

AMD Raven - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 组合3.5毫米音频插孔, Card Reader: SD

Networking

Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 16 x 324 x 212

Battery

47 Wh, 6150 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p网络摄像头

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Harman/Kardon, Keyboard: 巧克力背光键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, carrying case, McAfee, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.39 kg, Power Supply: 151 g

Price

700 Euro

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
81.2 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2020	Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T R7 3700U, Vega 10	1.4 kg	16 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
88.4 % v6 ^(old)	10 / 2024	Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE R7 3700U, Vega 10	1.9 kg	19.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
79.7 % v6 ^(old)		Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 R7 3700U, Vega 10	1.8 kg	19.5 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
80.9 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2020	MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US i5-10210U, GeForce MX250	1.2 kg	16 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
77.8 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2020	HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250	1.6 kg	18 mm	14.00"	1920x1080

Size comparison

Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US DIN A4 ❌

Left side: power supply, HDMI, 1x USB 3.1 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x USB 3.1 Gen 1 Type-C

Right side: SD card reader, combined 3.5 mm audio jack, 1x USB 2.0 Type-A

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)	77.1 MB/s +192%
Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=13, last 2 years)	52.8 MB/s +100%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	37.7 MB/s +43%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	32 MB/s +21%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	28 MB/s +6%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	26.4 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)	87.6 MB/s +136%
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=13, last 2 years)	64.3 MB/s +73%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	37.6 MB/s +1%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	37.1 MB/s
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	33 MB/s -11%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	27.1 MB/s -27%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	928 MBit/s +55%
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter	613 MBit/s +3%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter	598 (519^min - 628^max) MBit/s
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	290 MBit/s -52%
iperf3 receive AX12
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1070 MBit/s +157%
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter	640 MBit/s +54%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter	416 (375^min - 465^max) MBit/s
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	309 MBit/s -26%

Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø415 (375-465)

Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø598 (519-628)


275 cd/m²	266 cd/m²	255 cd/m²
245 cd/m²	253 cd/m²	215 cd/m²
239 cd/m²	240 cd/m²	221 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

CEC PA LM140LF-3L03 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 275 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 245.4 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 78 %
Center on Battery: 263 cd/m²
Contrast: 1124:1 (Black: 0.225 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.9
ΔE Greyscale 6.33 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.52

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T CEC PA LM140LF-3L03, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE NV156FHM-N49, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 LG Philips 156WFC, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Chi Mei N140HCE-EN2, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng AUO543D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Display		-39%	-42%	-1%	3%
Display P3 Coverage	66.7	39.88 -40%	37.31 -44%	64.2 -4%	66.5 0%
sRGB Coverage	92.3	58.6 -37%	56.2 -39%	94.8 3%	98.4 7%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	67.5	41.2 -39%	38.55 -43%	65.4 -3%	68.2 1%
Response Times		878%	8%	18891%	-42%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	36 ?(19, 17)	41.2 ?(22, 19.2) -14%	28.4 ?(10.4, 18) 21%	39.2 ?(20.8, 18.4) -9%	60.8 ?(29.2, 31.6) -69%
Response Time Black / White *	26 ?(15, 11)	32.8 ?(18, 14.8) -26%	27.2 ?(16.4, 10.8) -5%	35.6 ?(21.2, 14.4) -37%	29.6 ?(13.2, 16.4) -14%
PWM Frequency	44 ?(20)	1220 ?(99) 2673%		25000 ?(28) 56718%
Screen		-16%	-22%	30%	14%
Brightness middle	253	318 26%	253.6 0%	324.1 28%	395 56%
Brightness	245	297 21%	227 -7%	301 23%	375 53%
Brightness Distribution	78	89 14%	84 8%	87 12%	91 17%
Black Level *	0.225	0.17 24%	0.27 -20%	0.22 2%	0.26 -16%
Contrast	1124	1871 66%	939 -16%	1473 31%	1519 35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	8.89	5.5 38%	6.05 32%	1.63 82%	5.92 33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.56	21 -361%	14.03 -208%	4.25 7%	9.79 -115%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	4.9	5.1 -4%	4.97 -1%	1.42 71%	0.91 81%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.33	1.8 72%	3.2 49%	2.2 65%	6.69 -6%
Gamma	2.52 ^87%	2.12 ^104%	2 ^110%	2.26 ^97%	2.78 ^79%
CCT	6745 ^96%	6257 ^104%	6820 ^95%	6887 ^94%	7596 ^86%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	60	37.6 -37%	35.5 -41%	60.2 0%	63 5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	91	58.2 -36%	55.6 -39%	95 4%	98 8%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		274% / 138%	-19% / -22%	6307% / 3353%	-8% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19 ms rise
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

44 Hz

≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 44 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 44 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Ryzen 7 3700U: Ø512 (499.03-642.87)

Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Ryzen 7 3700U: Ø684 (680.39-687.17)

Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Ryzen 7 3700U: Ø654 (639.01-676.19)

MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel Core i5-10210U: Ø565 (559.89-595.69)

HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø625 (592.25-691)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=58, last 2 years)	249 Points +87%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7	190 Points +43%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Intel Core i5-10210U	170 Points +28%
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	144 Points +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3700U (127 - 146, n=7)	138 Points +4%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	135 Points +2%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	133 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=63, last 2 years)	1987 Points +210%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7	691 Points +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	683 (680.39^min - 687.17^max) Points +6%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	672 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3700U (537 - 683, n=7)	648 Points +1%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	642 Points
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Intel Core i5-10210U	596 Points -7%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

133 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

642 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

48.35 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=49, last 2 years)	6427 Points +67%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	4497 Points +17%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	4289 Points +11%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	3903 Points +1%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A	3851 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (3522 - 3903, n=7)	3720 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG	3605 Points -6%
Essentials
Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=49, last 2 years)	10486 Points +36%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	8912 Points +16%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	7861 Points +2%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	7692 Points 0%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A	7685 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (6927 - 7692, n=7)	7306 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG	6927 Points -10%
Productivity
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=49, last 2 years)	8627 Points +48%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	7433 Points +28%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	7040 Points +21%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	5859 Points +1%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A	5823 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (5459 - 5952, n=7)	5745 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG	5637 Points -3%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=49, last 2 years)	8048 Points +132%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	4461 Points +29%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	3581 Points +3%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A	3466 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (3082 - 3581, n=7)	3333 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG	3258 Points -6%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	3233 Points -7%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (3325 - 3993, n=7)	3628 Points +1%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A	3604 Points
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	3504 Points -3%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	3464 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG	3342 Points -7%
Average of class Subnotebook (1739 - 4730, n=2, last 2 years)	3235 Points -10%
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	4992 Points +3%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A	4842 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (4418 - 4869, n=6)	4665 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG	4593 Points -5%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4429 Points -9%
Average of class Subnotebook (1609 - 5271, n=2, last 2 years)	3440 Points -29%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3604 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4842 points
PCMark 10 Score		3851 points
Help

	Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A	Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG	Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	Average SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		11%	-3%	15%	108%	10%
Write 4K	118.8	129.5 9%	105.9 -11%	107.7 -9%	181.6 53%	110 ?(89.3 - 121.9, n=3) -7%
Read 4K	41.62	41.23 -1%	36.56 -12%	39.73 -5%	57.4 38%	40.6 ?(37.4 - 42.7, n=3) -2%
Write Seq	796	811 2%	1165 46%	926 16%	1982 149%	677 ?(608 - 796, n=3) -15%
Read Seq	1101	1145 4%	423.2 -62%	1014 -8%	1899 72%	1104 ?(1019 - 1193, n=3) 0%
Write 4K Q32T1	234.7	314.1 34%	332.1 41%	343.6 46%	509 117%	438 ?(235 - 590, n=3) 87%
Read 4K Q32T1	313.8	356.2 14%	229.3 -27%	499.1 59%	545 74%	338 ?(285 - 415, n=3) 8%
Write Seq Q32T1	842	839 0%	1460 73%	1033 23%	3072 265%	860 ?(842 - 872, n=3) 2%
Read Seq Q32T1	1645	2042 24%	472.5 -71%	1604 -2%	3281 99%	1786 ?(1635 - 2078, n=3) 9%
AS SSD		5%	-9%	-25%	79%	6%
Seq Read	1417	1698 20%	398.9 -72%	1061 -25%	2762 95%	1471 ?(1264 - 1731, n=3) 4%
Seq Write	781	740 -5%	884 13%	953 22%	2493 219%	612 ?(518 - 781, n=3) -22%
4K Read	37.03	39.18 6%	34.54 -7%	35.59 -4%	52.1 41%	40.2 ?(37 - 43.2, n=3) 9%
4K Write	80.1	87.7 9%	82.1 2%	87 9%	147.5 84%	108.8 ?(80.1 - 127.3, n=3) 36%
4K-64 Read	740	764 3%	647 -13%	769 4%	1473 99%	794 ?(740 - 869, n=3) 7%
4K-64 Write	748	669 -11%	985 32%	733 -2%	1456 95%	764 ?(672 - 871, n=3) 2%
Access Time Read *	0.047	0.04 15%	0.072 -53%	0.084 -79%	0.094 -100%	0.046 ?(0.045 - 0.047, n=3) 2%
Access Time Write *	0.045	0.036 20%	0.047 -4%	0.136 -202%	0.03 33%	0.03533 ?(0.03 - 0.045, n=3) 21%
Score Read	918	973 6%	721 -21%	911 -1%	1801 96%	981 ?(918 - 1085, n=3) 7%
Score Write	906	831 -8%	1155 27%	916 1%	1853 105%	867 ?(843 - 906, n=3) -4%
Score Total	2270	2261 0%	2279 0%	2294 1%	4568 101%	2315 ?(2234 - 2442, n=3) 2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		8% / 7%	-6% / -6%	-5% / -8%	94% / 91%	8% / 8%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1645 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 842 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 313.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 234.7 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1101 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 796 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.62 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 118.8 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Subnotebook (968 - 16296, n=53, last 2 years)	9600 Points +183%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i5-10210U	4920 Points +45%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-1065G7	4614 Points +36%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	4165 Points +23%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (2688 - 4165, n=17)	3483 Points +3%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	3389 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	3287 Points -3%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook (5577 - 58319, n=29, last 2 years)	36827 Points +129%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i5-10210U	23376 Points +46%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	20784 Points +30%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	16048 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (9364 - 20784, n=16)	14708 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	13891 Points -13%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook (832 - 11887, n=57, last 2 years)	6933 Points +205%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i5-10210U	3845 Points +69%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-1065G7	3580 Points +58%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	2999 Points +32%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	2272 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (1567 - 2999, n=17)	2224 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	2025 Points -11%

3DMark 11 Performance		3449 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		11126 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		2028 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	93.8	60.7	49.72	17.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	68.7	58.6	36	30.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	16.1	8.1

Noise Level

Idle		28 / 28 / 28 dB(A)
Load		36.8 / 39 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 29.8 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


37 °C	36.9 °C	34.3 °C
35.3 °C	34.8 °C	24.4 °C
29.4 °C	26.9 °C	26.2 °C

Maximum: 37 °C
Average: 31.7 °C


32.6 °C	34.7 °C	36.3 °C
27.5 °C	32.2 °C	35 °C
26.6 °C	28.5 °C	30.5 °C

Maximum: 36.3 °C
Average: 31.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 45 °C | Room Temperature 21.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket / Fluke t3000 FC

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.4 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.4 °C / 84.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.32 / 0.36 Watt
Idle	3.6 / 7.2 / 10.8 Watt
Load	38 / 45.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T R7 3700U, Vega 10, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE R7 3700U, Vega 10, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 R7 3700U, Vega 10, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10	Average of class Subnotebook
Power Consumption		6%	6%	-16%	-21%	-3%	-19%
Idle Minimum *	3.6	4.2 -17%	4.2 -17%	4.2 -17%	4 -11%	4.73 ?(3.2 - 7, n=16) -31%	4.49 ?(1.3 - 9.3, n=58, last 2 years) -25%
Idle Average *	7.2	7.92 -10%	6.8 6%	5.9 18%	7 3%	7.61 ?(2.8 - 10.6, n=16) -6%	7.66 ?(2.5 - 16, n=58, last 2 years) -6%
Idle Maximum *	10.8	8.16 24%	7 35%	7.2 33%	10 7%	9.63 ?(7 - 12.9, n=16) 11%	9.56 ?(4.1 - 16.8, n=58, last 2 years) 11%
Load Average *	38	29 24%	36.5 4%	63.4 -67%	62 -63%	33.3 ?(24.2 - 40.6, n=16) 12%	46.6 ?(19.1 - 78.6, n=56, last 2 years) -23%
Load Maximum *	45.2	42.2 7%	44 3%	67.4 -49%	64 -42%	45.1 ?(38.5 - 55.5, n=16) -0%	68.6 ?(24.2 - 121.2, n=58, last 2 years) -52%
Witcher 3 ultra *			37.9	53.5	58

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		17h 48min
WiFi Websurfing		6h 44min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 05min

	Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T R7 3700U, Vega 10, 47 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE R7 3700U, Vega 10, 45 Wh	Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 R7 3700U, Vega 10, 42 Wh	MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, 50 Wh	HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250, 41 Wh	Average of class Subnotebook
Battery Runtime		-8%	-17%	1%	-30%	45%
Reader / Idle	1068	941 -12%	856 -20%	986 -8%	694 -35%	1750 ?(581 - 3407, n=12, last 2 years) 64%
WiFi v1.3	404	460 14%	421 4%	515 27%	368 -9%	719 ?(389 - 1585, n=59, last 2 years) 78%
Load	125	92 -26%	81 -35%	105 -16%	69 -45%	116.6 ?(57 - 197, n=46, last 2 years) -7%

Pros

+ 平滑轻巧

+ 精美的设计

+ 数字键盘与ClickPad集成在一起

Cons

- 维护选项很少

- 光滑的键盘表面

- 一般般的CPU性能

- 续航时间一般

Verdict - Pretty design with slowed-down CPU

In review: Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA. Test device provided by:

有了Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA，购买它的人将获得设计出色的笔记本电脑，并且价格相对较低，且轻便。该外壳看起来非常高品质，各种装饰元素给人以更贵的感觉。除此之外，还具有集成数字键盘的功能，事实证明这是对键盘的有效补充。接口稳定可靠，尽管Wi-Fi 5并不是一个很大的卖点，但无线连接速度仍然是快速的。

ZenBook 14是一款外观精美的坚固笔记本电脑。不幸的是，它不能完全利用其CPU的性能。

但是，潜在的购买者不应将自己的选择局限于Ryzen 7 3700U型号，而可以自信地购买性能较弱的CPU型号。由于散热系统不能支持全部性能，因此长期性能远远低于我们为该处理器的期望。由于无法升级内存，因此在购买之前确定合适的型号时还需要考虑其内存大小。如果您最感兴趣的是设计和机身，而不一定是实际性能，那么您仍然可以毫不犹豫地购买这款笔记本电脑。

Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T - 02/11/2020 v7 ^(old)
Mike Wobker

Chassis

80 / 98 → 82%

Keyboard

80%

Pointing Device

75%

Connectivity

41 / 75 → 55%

Weight

70 / 20-75 → 91%

Battery