华硕ZenBook 15 (i7-8565U, GTX1050 Max-Q) 笔记本电脑评测
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD (ZenBook 15 UX533 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-8565U 4 x 1.8 - 4.6 GHz, Whiskey Lake-U
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 1000 MHz, RAM: 1752 MHz, Boost: 1139 MHz, 398.75, Intel UHD Graphics 620
Memory
16 GB
, 双通道
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE07D8, IPS, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Storage
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, 512 GB
, 430 GB free
Weight
1.6 kg, Power Supply: 383 g
Price
12000 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø650 (547-681)
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø643 (499-661)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE07D8 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 334 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 303.2 cd/m² Minimum: 17.1 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 311 cd/m²
Contrast: 1296:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.48
ΔE Greyscale 4.93 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
88.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD BOE07D8, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 Base Model BOE NV156FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS B156HAK02.0, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA AUO30EB, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -2% | -41% | 4% | 31% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 67.2 | 66.3 -1% | 36.94 -45% | 67.8 1% | 85.9 28% |
| sRGB Coverage | 88.4 | 86.6 -2% | 55.3 -37% | 94.1 6% | 100 13% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.6 | 63.3 -2% | 38.16 -41% | 67.9 5% | 99.1 53% |
| Response Times | 9% | 26% | -1% | 20% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45 ? | 39.2 ? 13% | 33.2 ? 26% | 56 ? -24% | 44 ? 2% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 37 ? | 35.2 ? 5% | 27.6 ? 25% | 29 ? 22% | 22.8 ? 38% |
| PWM Frequency | 21190 ? | ||||
| Screen | -2% | -26% | 7% | 3% | |
| Brightness middle | 311 | 273.6 -12% | 254.5 -18% | 440 41% | 357.6 15% |
| Brightness | 303 | 262 -14% | 238 -21% | 389 28% | 350 16% |
| Brightness Distribution | 81 | 86 6% | 87 7% | 83 2% | 85 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.3 -25% | 0.27 -13% | 0.34 -42% | 0.35 -46% |
| Contrast | 1296 | 912 -30% | 943 -27% | 1294 0% | 1022 -21% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.1 | 3.22 37% | 4.58 10% | 5.04 1% | 4.12 19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.91 | 7.61 15% | 17.99 -102% | 6.99 22% | 9.91 -11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.48 | 4.1 -65% | 4.34 -75% | 2.04 18% | 4.23 -71% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.93 | 1.4 72% | 3.3 33% | 4.98 -1% | 1.8 63% |
| Gamma | 2.44 90% | 2.24 98% | 2.403 92% | 2.48 89% | 2.17 101% |
| CCT | 7641 85% | 6636 98% | 6355 102% | 7777 84% | 6613 98% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58 | 56.4 -3% | 35 -40% | 61 5% | 87.5 51% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 88 | 86.2 -2% | 55 -37% | 94 7% | 100 14% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
-1% | -14% /
-22% | 3% /
6% | 18% /
11% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 24 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø704 (683.27-815.1)
Razer Blade 15 Base Model Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø864 (856.88-926.63)
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS Intel Core i7-8650U, Intel Core i7-8650U: Ø482 (448.21-590.42)
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4052 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5381 points | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4443 points | |
Help | ||
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Razer Blade 15 Base Model Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04 | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Average WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 22% | -4% | -1% | 17% | 12% | |
| Write 4K | 126.2 | 112.5 -11% | 122.1 -3% | 94.8 -25% | 125 -1% | 138.5 ? 10% |
| Read 4K | 41.2 | 43.09 5% | 44.61 8% | 26.45 -36% | 44.68 8% | 44.2 ? 7% |
| Write Seq | 1055 | 1450 37% | 826 -22% | 1037 -2% | 1059 0% | 1265 ? 20% |
| Read Seq | 884 | 1392 57% | 811 -8% | 1280 45% | 772 -13% | 1237 ? 40% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 445.5 | 356.1 -20% | 293.9 -34% | 277.6 -38% | 507 14% | 404 ? -9% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 338.8 | 406.9 20% | 374.8 11% | 333.9 -1% | 614 81% | 421 ? 24% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1453 | 1451 0% | 1714 18% | 1037 -29% | 1763 21% | 1491 ? 3% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1734 | 3272 89% | 1772 2% | 3135 81% | 2171 25% | 1741 ? 0% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 1044 | 715 ? | ||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 914 | 1027 ? | ||||
| AS SSD | 31% | 46% | 26% | 69% | 29% | |
| Seq Read | 579 | 1803 211% | 1454 151% | 2454 324% | 2099 263% | 1363 ? 135% |
| Seq Write | 411.8 | 1367 232% | 1324 222% | 948 130% | 1729 320% | 1227 ? 198% |
| 4K Read | 41.81 | 40.75 -3% | 50.8 22% | 19.07 -54% | 37.78 -10% | 40.8 ? -2% |
| 4K Write | 131.6 | 93 -29% | 106.2 -19% | 105.4 -20% | 100.9 -23% | 127.3 ? -3% |
| 4K-64 Read | 975 | 749 -23% | 1140 17% | 856 -12% | 1431 47% | 957 ? -2% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1047 | 1270 21% | 1325 27% | 953 -9% | 1273 22% | 1081 ? 3% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.08 | 0.113 -41% | 0.047 41% | 0.051 36% | 0.04 50% | 0.07744 ? 3% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.027 | 0.04 -48% | 0.035 -30% | 0.056 -107% | 0.036 -33% | 0.03671 ? -36% |
| Score Read | 1075 | 970 -10% | 1336 24% | 1120 4% | 1679 56% | 1134 ? 5% |
| Score Write | 1220 | 1499 23% | 1564 28% | 1153 -5% | 1547 27% | 1331 ? 9% |
| Score Total | 2845 | 2952 4% | 3587 26% | 2768 -3% | 4065 43% | 3046 ? 7% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1892 | 2507 | 1045 | 1169 ? | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 495.5 | 395.4 | 430.9 | 446 ? | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 1070 | 1129 | 728 | 874 ? | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 27% /
27% | 21% /
25% | 13% /
15% | 43% /
47% | 21% /
22% |
* ... smaller is better
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Sequential Read:
900 MB/s
Sequential Write:
1050 MB/s
512K Read:
451.7 MB/s
512K Write:
791 MB/s
4K Read:
39.15 MB/s
4K Write:
115.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
300.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
412.3 MB/s
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 9694 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7116 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 17993 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5209 points | |
Help | ||
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G: Ø27.5 (26-30)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 266 | 252 | 150 | 59 |
| Thief (2014) | 106 | 76 | 66 | 38 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 64 | 60 | 41 | 30 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 98 | 62 | 36 | 29 |
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 30.5 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 40.8 / 41.8 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.8 °C / -3.3 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.8 °C / -3.3 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.48 / 0.8 Watt |
| Idle | 2.7 / 8 / 10.6 Watt |
| Load |
74 / 89 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 Base Model i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -99% | 0% | -46% | -127% | -24% | -47% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.7 | 10.2 -278% | 4.7 -74% | 6.1 -126% | 11.7 -333% | 4.48 ? -66% | 6.54 ? -142% |
| Idle Average * | 8 | 13.2 -65% | 7.9 1% | 10.2 -28% | 18.5 -131% | 9.58 ? -20% | 11.3 ? -41% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.6 | 17.6 -66% | 11.4 -8% | 13.4 -26% | 22.8 -115% | 11.6 ? -9% | 13.3 ? -25% |
| Load Average * | 74 | 99.5 -34% | 47.2 36% | 82 -11% | 97.5 -32% | 77.3 ? -4% | 70.7 ? 4% |
| Load Maximum * | 89 | 133.3 -50% | 48.1 46% | 122 -37% | 111.1 -25% | 105.5 ? -19% | 116.1 ? -30% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 113.6 | 102.9 |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 73 Wh | Razer Blade 15 Base Model i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 65 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 96 Wh | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 71 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -47% | -51% | -20% | -44% | -15% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1587 | 690 -57% | 1027 -35% | 842 -47% | 1168 ? -26% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 519 | 330 -36% | 252 -51% | 523 1% | 375 -28% | 640 ? 23% |
| Load | 171 | 87 -49% | 128 -25% | 76 -56% | 97.1 ? -43% |
Pros
+ 续航时间长
+ 散热和噪音管理优秀
+ 系统性能强
+ 可以打游戏
+ 可维护性高
Cons
- 高反光屏幕
在我们的评测中，华硕ZenBook 15已经证明了自己是一款非常强大，具有高移动性的笔记本电脑，可以运行现代游戏。纤薄的外形，超长的续航时间和低重量使华硕笔记本电脑更适合在旅途中使用。但是，那些想要使用ZenBook 15玩游戏的人必须在大多数时间内插上电源。
华硕ZenBook 15也可以看作是一款小巧的游戏笔记本，它可以运行所有最新游戏。此外，它在续航时间方面也很出色。
ZenBook 15具有性能非常好的硬件，可以满足大多数用户的需求。USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C端口可以用来拓展缺少的接口。如果有需要，SSD可以拓展。RAM方面则没有其他升级选项，但鉴于我们的评测设备配备了16 GB的RAM，这点也可以接受。得益于Nvidia的Max-Q技术，温度也得到了很好的控制。
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
- 02/14/2019 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker
Multimedia - Weighted Average
Price comparison
