华硕 ZenBook UX360UA 变形本简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N |
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng |
|
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 344 cd/m²
Contrast: 1274:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.53 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.67 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T AU Optronics AOU272D / B133HAN02.7, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Sharp LQ133T1JW02, , 2560x1440, 13.3" | HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng LGD04A5, , 1920x1280, 12" | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE LEN40E6 N125HCE-GN1, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 6% | -20% | -33% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 64.8 | 69.6 7% | 52.9 -18% | 42.98 -34% |
sRGB Coverage | 93.1 | 98 5% | 71.8 -23% | 62.8 -33% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66 | 70.7 7% | 52.6 -20% | 44.55 -32% |
Response Times | 606% | -54% | -90% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 29 ? | 36 ? -24% | 51 ? -76% | 64 ? -121% |
Response Time Black / White * | 19 ? | 30 ? -58% | 25 ? -32% | 30 ? -58% |
PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 1000 ? 1900% | ||
Screen | 17% | -15% | -26% | |
Brightness middle | 344 | 320 -7% | 353 3% | 371 8% |
Brightness | 326 | 308 -6% | 347 6% | 335 3% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 91 6% | 91 6% | 84 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.17 37% | 0.44 -63% | 0.29 -7% |
Contrast | 1274 | 1882 48% | 802 -37% | 1279 0% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.53 | 3.18 42% | 6.09 -10% | 8.51 -54% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.01 | 9.91 1% | 20.43 -104% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.67 | 4.13 38% | 6.24 6% | 9.23 -38% |
Gamma | 2.43 91% | 2.03 108% | 2.41 91% | 2.24 98% |
CCT | 7012 93% | 6752 96% | 7238 90% | 6759 96% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 65 8% | 46 -23% | 41 -32% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 98 5% | 71 -24% | 62 -33% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 210% /
126% | -30% /
-22% | -50% /
-36% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise | |
↘ 12 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 50 Hz | ≤ 40 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 40 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE | |
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE | |
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3435 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4315 points | |
Help |
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) | Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Lite-On CV1-8B256 | HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng Liteon L8H-256V2G | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 3% | -15% | -1% | |
Read Seq | 452.1 | 507 12% | 517 14% | 468.9 4% |
Write Seq | 421.3 | 354.4 -16% | 270.1 -36% | 297.3 -29% |
Read 512 | 288.6 | 355.3 23% | 369.2 28% | 397.9 38% |
Write 512 | 310.7 | 353.9 14% | 264.6 -15% | 297.1 -4% |
Read 4k | 28.52 | 32.66 15% | 23.48 -18% | 33.11 16% |
Write 4k | 72.1 | 81.6 13% | 57.4 -20% | 85.1 18% |
Read 4k QD32 | 389.6 | 277.6 -29% | 223.4 -43% | 398.3 2% |
Write 4k QD32 | 285.3 | 261.2 -8% | 195.8 -31% | 136.6 -52% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE |
3DMark - 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1651 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 65139 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5832 points | |
Help |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 49.5 | 29.2 | 24.5 | |
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 32.2 | 24.8 | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 13.6 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 30.5 / 32.1 / 32.3 dB(A) |
HDD |
| 32 dB(A) |
DVD |
| 37.6 / dB(A) |
Load |
| 36.1 / 36.1 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.3 °C / 79.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+1.7 °C / 3.1 F).
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.22 / 0.24 Watt |
Idle | 6.9 / 7.9 / 8.3 Watt |
Load |
30.1 / 29.6 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Lite-On CV1-8B256, IPS, 2560x1440, 13.3" | HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Liteon L8H-256V2G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12" | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -18% | 8% | 22% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6.9 | 6.2 10% | 6 13% | 3.6 48% |
Idle Average * | 7.9 | 8 -1% | 8 -1% | 6.3 20% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.3 | 11.6 -40% | 10.6 -28% | 7.6 8% |
Load Average * | 30.1 | 40 -33% | 21.5 29% | 27.2 10% |
Load Maximum * | 29.6 | 36.6 -24% | 22 26% | 22.8 23% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 57 Wh | Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 49 Wh | HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 43 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -42% | -28% | -35% | |
Reader / Idle | 1165 | 669 -43% | 681 -42% | 943 -19% |
WiFi v1.3 | 581 | 382 -34% | 364 -37% | 346 -40% |
Load | 169 | 85 -50% | 161 -5% | 92 -46% |
H.264 | 393 |
Pros
Cons
我们的测试基于我们所得到的设备——这是一台来自在线商店的全新零售机型。遗憾的是,这台变形本由于不合理的屏幕转轴收到了不小的限制。它在笔记本电脑模式下或在汽车或火车上等摇晃的情况下几乎无法正常使用。另外,它的屏幕在桌面使用时也经常无法稳定保持一定角度。这个缺陷给它的最后得分带来了不小的影响。我们也对华硕提出了质疑。我们将在之后更新相应的官方答复。
离成功仅剩一步之遥。经常无法正常使用的屏幕转轴让我们很难推荐用户选择华硕ZenBook Flip UX360UA,尽管它在性能上表现十分优秀。
除此之外,它几乎没有任何问题。我们对无法维护升级硬件感到有些失望,不过这在同类产品中十分常见。为什么生产商会使用Torx螺丝依然让我们难以理解。它的读卡器速度相比同价位设备也较为迟缓。同时测试编辑在使用它的触控版时感觉它的滑动流畅性较弱。
它的机身在雅致、纤薄的同时不失坚固,十分值得赞赏。同时它的屏幕,安静的散热风扇和超长电池续航也表现出众。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
- 10/17/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn