Notebookcheck Logo

华硕 ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL 智能手机简短评测

最新奢华。 华硕的最新ZenFone 3 Deluxe旗舰智能手机即将在欧洲市场上市。它搭配了高通最新的高端处理器,高分辨率2300万像素相机和一块5.7寸AMOLED屏幕,这台设备还支持一些最新技术。不过它在和其他顶级机型的竞争中表现如何呢?
ARM Smartphone Touchscreen Android Phablet
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL (Zenfone Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 4 x 2.4 GHz, Kryo
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
, LPDDR4
Display
5.70 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 386 PPI, 电容式, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 4, glossy: yes
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 109 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: micro-SD 最大支持 2 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速感应器,陀螺仪,电子指南针,近距感应器,霍尔感应器,色彩感应器,红外感应器, USB-OTG, WiFi Direct, Miracast, FM radio
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (频段: 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 19, 34, 39, BC0), 4G (频段: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41) DL Cat 12/13, UL Cat 11, 头部电磁辐射: 0.663 W/kg, 身体电磁辐射: 0.970 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.5 x 156.4 x 77.4
Battery
3000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 23 MPix (自动对焦 f/2.0, 2160p 视频拍摄 @30 FPS, 索尼 IMX318)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (定焦 f/2.0, 1080p 视频拍摄 @30 FPS, 84° 广角)
Additional features
Speakers: 位于底部的单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 18瓦电源适配器,USB-C数据线(2.0),入耳式耳机, ZenUI 3.0, Facebook, Instagram, Puffin, TripAdvisor, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
172 g, Power Supply: 92 g
Price
799 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Front view of the ZenFone 3 Deluxe (with card slot)
Front view of the ZenFone 3 Deluxe (with card slot)
Front view of the ZenFone 3 Deluxe
Front view of the ZenFone 3 Deluxe
Rear view of the ZenFone 3 Deluxe
Rear view of the ZenFone 3 Deluxe
Packaging of the ZenFone 3 Deluxe
Card slot of the ZenFone 3 Deluxe
Headset included
18-watt power supply

Size Comparison

158.2 mm 77.9 mm 7.3 mm 188 g156.9 mm 78.9 mm 7.9 mm 192 g156.4 mm 77.4 mm 7.5 mm 172 g154.7 mm 75.7 mm 8.5 mm 168 g155.3 mm 75.3 mm 5.19 mm 136 g151.9 mm 78.4 mm 8.3 mm 165 g150.9 mm 72.6 mm 7.7 mm 157 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
485 MBit/s +542%
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
435 MBit/s +476%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
335 MBit/s +344%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
313 MBit/s +315%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
165 MBit/s +119%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
Adreno 530, SD 821, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
75.5 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
532 MBit/s +656%
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
515 MBit/s +632%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
281 MBit/s +299%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
259 MBit/s +268%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
257 MBit/s +265%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
Adreno 530, SD 821, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
70.4 MBit/s
Garmin Edge 500 - Route
Garmin Edge 500 - Route
Garmin Edge 500 - Underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - Underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - Turning point
Garmin Edge 500 - Turning point
Asus ZenFone  3 Deluxe - Route
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe - Route
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe - Underpass
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe - Underpass
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe - Turning point
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe - Turning point
Camera app (automatic)
Camera app (automatic)
Camera app (manual)
Camera app (manual)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
463
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
509
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
464
cd/m²
493
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
448
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 509 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 468.4 cd/m² Minimum: 3.01 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 619 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.27
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.7"
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"
Lenovo Moto Z
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"
Huawei Mate 9
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.9"
Google Pixel XL 2016
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7"
Screen
Brightness middle
464
554
19%
485
5%
696
50%
402
-13%
557
20%
297
-36%
Brightness
468
552
18%
490
5%
680
45%
408
-13%
553
18%
297
-37%
Brightness Distribution
85
96
13%
92
8%
93
9%
85
0%
97
14%
93
9%
Black Level *
0.42
0.35
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.2
1.59
50%
2.1
34%
4.3
-34%
4
-25%
1.4
56%
2.67
17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.5
2.56
76%
5.5
48%
9.4
10%
10.1
4%
3.1
70%
3.98
62%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.4
2.01
-44%
2.6
-86%
4.8
-243%
3.2
-129%
1.3
7%
2.81
-101%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.01 109%
2.23 99%
2.33 94%
2.19 100%
2.21 100%
2.08 106%
CCT
6590 99%
6321 103%
6843 95%
7255 90%
7037 92%
6667 97%
6379 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
82.12
88.14
63.1
66.31
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.98
100
99.83
99.79
Contrast
1657
1591

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 235.8 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 235.8 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 235.8 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
Grayscale (Super Color, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (Super Color, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (Super Color, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (Super Color, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (Super Color, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (Super Color, target color space: sRGB)
Colorspace (Super Color, target color space: sRGB)
Colorspace (Super Color, target color space: sRGB)
Colorspace (Super Color, target color space: AdobeRGB)
Colorspace (Super Color, target color space: AdobeRGB)
Grayscale (Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (Standard, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (Standard, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (adapted color temperature, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (adapted color temperature, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (adapted color temperature, target color space: AdobeRGB)
ColorChecker (adapted color temperature, target color space: AdobeRGB)
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
154126 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
128749 Points -16%
Lenovo Moto Z
129197 Points -16%
Huawei Mate 9
124087 Points -19%
Google Pixel XL 2016
138641 Points -10%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
165399 Points +7%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
94122 Points -39%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
4045 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
5503 Points +36%
Lenovo Moto Z
3946 Points -2%
Huawei Mate 9
5629 Points +39%
Google Pixel XL 2016
4167 Points +3%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
5630 Points +39%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
1482 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
1840 Points +24%
Lenovo Moto Z
1480 Points 0%
Huawei Mate 9
1947 Points +31%
Google Pixel XL 2016
1513 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3476 Points +135%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
7171 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2805 Points -61%
Lenovo Moto Z
6326 Points -12%
Huawei Mate 9
3191 Points -56%
Google Pixel XL 2016
7047 Points -2%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
4940 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4660 Points -6%
Lenovo Moto Z
7637 Points +55%
Huawei Mate 9
7403 Points +50%
Google Pixel XL 2016
4739 Points -4%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
1136 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
994 Points -12%
Lenovo Moto Z
959 Points -16%
Huawei Mate 9
1076 Points -5%
Google Pixel XL 2016
977 Points -14%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1542 Points +36%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
837 Points -26%
Graphics (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
4467 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2203 Points -51%
Lenovo Moto Z
4321 Points -3%
Huawei Mate 9
3939 Points -12%
Google Pixel XL 2016
5017 Points +12%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6875 Points +54%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
2040 Points -54%
System (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
3763 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4080 Points +8%
Lenovo Moto Z
3398 Points -10%
Huawei Mate 9
3616 Points -4%
Google Pixel XL 2016
3889 Points +3%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6582 Points +75%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1386 Points -63%
Overall (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
2501 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2074 Points -17%
Lenovo Moto Z
2356 Points -6%
Huawei Mate 9
2772 Points +11%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2378 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3097 Points +24%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1465 Points -41%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
59 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
51 fps -14%
Lenovo Moto Z
53 fps -10%
Huawei Mate 9
60 fps +2%
Google Pixel XL 2016
55 fps -7%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
57.7 fps -2%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
18.75 fps -68%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
96 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
81 fps -16%
Lenovo Moto Z
77 fps -20%
Huawei Mate 9
80 fps -17%
Google Pixel XL 2016
91 fps -5%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
92 fps -4%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
27.11 fps -72%
GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
49 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
38 fps -22%
Lenovo Moto Z
41 fps -16%
Huawei Mate 9
34 fps -31%
Google Pixel XL 2016
48 fps -2%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
58.7 fps +20%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
17.54 fps -64%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
48 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
27 fps -44%
Lenovo Moto Z
26 fps -46%
Huawei Mate 9
37 fps -23%
Google Pixel XL 2016
30 fps -37%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
55.2 fps +15%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
11.81 fps -75%
GFXBench 3.1
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
32 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28 fps -12%
Lenovo Moto Z
27 fps -16%
Huawei Mate 9
24 fps -25%
Google Pixel XL 2016
32 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.3 fps +29%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
32 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps -53%
Lenovo Moto Z
15 fps -53%
Huawei Mate 9
28 fps -12%
Google Pixel XL 2016
17 fps -47%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.5 fps +30%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
34290 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28671 Points -16%
Lenovo Moto Z
25135 Points -27%
Huawei Mate 9
27364 Points -20%
Google Pixel XL 2016
27766 Points -19%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
37746 Points +10%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
40761 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
33031 Points -19%
Lenovo Moto Z
26659 Points -35%
Huawei Mate 9
35626 Points -13%
Google Pixel XL 2016
32652 Points -20%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
63386 Points +56%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
22044 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
19610 Points -11%
Lenovo Moto Z
20948 Points -5%
Huawei Mate 9
15104 Points -31%
Google Pixel XL 2016
18222 Points -17%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
15626 Points -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
2078 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2002 (1539min) Points -4%
Lenovo Moto Z
1828 Points -12%
Huawei Mate 9
2123 Points +2%
Google Pixel XL 2016
1902 Points -8%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1522 Points -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
4694 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3015 (2895min) Points -36%
Lenovo Moto Z
3718 Points -21%
Huawei Mate 9
2448 Points -48%
Google Pixel XL 2016
3935 Points -16%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
4235 Points -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
3668 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2710 (2421min) Points -26%
Lenovo Moto Z
3023 Points -18%
Huawei Mate 9
2367 Points -35%
Google Pixel XL 2016
3180 Points -13%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3034 Points -17%

Legend

 
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Mate 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Google Pixel XL 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPhone 7 Plus Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
 
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
2400 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2564 ms * -7%
Lenovo Moto Z
3155 ms * -31%
Huawei Mate 9
2734 ms * -14%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2654 ms * -11%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1103 ms * +54%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
5553 ms * -131%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
10007 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13191 Points +32%
Lenovo Moto Z
7771 Points -22%
Huawei Mate 9
11897 Points +19%
Google Pixel XL 2016
8690 Points -13%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
26053 Points +160%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
8059 Points -19%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
107 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
163 Points +52%
Lenovo Moto Z
112 Points +5%
Huawei Mate 9
152 Points +42%
Google Pixel XL 2016
126 Points +18%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
204 Points +91%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
113 Points +6%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
59.8 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
75.1 Points +26%
Lenovo Moto Z
47.5 Points -21%
Huawei Mate 9
68.6 Points +15%
Google Pixel XL 2016
55.4 Points -7%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
168.1 Points +181%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
46 Points -23%

* ... smaller is better

Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KLSamsung Galaxy S7 EdgeLenovo Moto ZHuawei Mate 9Google Pixel XL 2016Apple iPhone 7 PlusMicrosoft Lumia 950 XL
AndroBench 3-5
Random Read 4KB
100.9
86.7
-14%
117.2
16%
94.7
-6%
87.7
-13%
Random Write 4KB
14.55
15.79
9%
74.9
415%
8.77
-40%
14.56
0%
Sequential Write 256KB
163.1
145.1
-11%
168.3
3%
142.9
-12%
83.4
-49%
Sequential Read 256KB
409
487.3
19%
439.7
8%
594
45%
258.2
-37%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
59
50.4
-15%
45.64
-23%
29.53
-50%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
77.8
76.4
-2%
78.5
1%
54
-31%
BaseMark OS II
Memory
2051
2072
1%
2190
7%
3850
88%
1677
-18%
1319
-36%
1945
-5%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high59 fps
Max. Load
 39.8 °C40.9 °C35.6 °C 
 40.2 °C40 °C35.5 °C 
 38.5 °C39.8 °C34.7 °C 
Maximum: 40.9 °C
Average: 38.3 °C
36 °C38.3 °C38.5 °C
35.9 °C36.4 °C39.7 °C
35.3 °C36.6 °C38.3 °C
Maximum: 39.7 °C
Average: 37.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  31.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.640.32525.435.43125.333.64032.929.85033.634.86331.633.28028.430100273112520.825.61602233.220021.338.725020.843.431521.252.340019.457.350019.56063017.763.980017.970.4100017.873.4125017.369.6160017.464.1200016.764.1250017.264.6315018.271.4400017.964.4500017.656.6630017.753.1800017.857.71000017.950.71250018.145.61600018.247.3SPL3078.9N1.339.8median 17.9median 57.3Delta1.49.440.632.932.440.641.629.831.341.634.532.131.734.538.140.92638.134.437.839.434.425.627.836.225.629.727.928.629.733.127.525.433.134.924.821.334.941.320.623.341.34526.122.54552.531.322.452.557.837.821.357.859.639.918.459.663.445.417.563.469.950.817.569.971.553.117.271.572.255.216.872.274.757.817.374.774.957.717.474.977.959.416.677.980.361.817.380.380.760.817.680.776.154.717.676.175.954.617.775.979.760.517.479.773.354.317.773.367.849.717.967.866.847.718.166.858.133.518.158.188.769.729.888.773.823.11.373.8median 71.5median 50.8median 17.7median 71.58.911.81.78.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KLSamsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.85 / 1.2 / 1.25 Watt
Load midlight 6.97 / 9.74 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Huawei Mate 9
4000 mAh
Google Pixel XL 2016
3450 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
3340 mAh
Power Consumption
11%
22%
-20%
23%
-19%
-113%
Idle Minimum *
0.85
0.63
26%
0.66
22%
0.78
8%
0.53
38%
0.77
9%
2.85
-235%
Idle Average *
1.2
1.1
8%
1.01
16%
2.13
-78%
1.07
11%
2.04
-70%
2.95
-146%
Idle Maximum *
1.25
1.56
-25%
1.09
13%
2.17
-74%
1.12
10%
2.24
-79%
3.26
-161%
Load Average *
6.97
5.95
15%
3.97
43%
6.32
9%
5.53
21%
4.69
33%
8.92
-28%
Load Maximum *
9.74
6.7
31%
8.34
14%
6.49
33%
6.26
36%
8.66
11%
9.39
4%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
23h 13min
WiFi Websurfing
7h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 19min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 29min
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Huawei Mate 9
4000 mAh
Google Pixel XL 2016
3450 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
3340 mAh
Battery Runtime
64%
23%
35%
6%
28%
-12%
Reader / Idle
1393
1663
19%
1371
-2%
1538
10%
1333
-4%
1835
32%
1078
-23%
H.264
799
914
14%
724
-9%
947
19%
505
-37%
813
2%
611
-24%
WiFi v1.3
463
732
58%
407
-12%
758
64%
505
9%
587
27%
369
-20%
Load
149
392
163%
320
115%
219
47%
230
54%
225
51%
179
20%

Pros

+ 非常坚固的机身
+ 高品质工艺
+ 双SIM/microSD复合卡槽
+ 高对比度AMOLED屏幕
+ 可选一直开启屏幕功能
+ 准确的触控屏幕响应
+ 支持Miracast、USB-OTG和NFC
+ USB-C接口
+ 实用的通话功能
+ 性能高
+ ZenUI支持许多额外功能
+ 对焦迅速的高分辨率相机

Cons

- 屏幕采用闪烁亮度控制
- 许多预装应用
- 较短的电池续航
- 不可拆卸电池
- 无定时安卓更新
- 无线网络小问题
In review: Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe (ZS570KL). Review sample courtesy of Asus Germany
In review: Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe (ZS570KL). Review sample courtesy of Asus Germany

华硕ZenFone 3 Deluxe在一入手时就给了我们很好的印象,它的高品质坚固金属机身质感十足。在机身内,它搭载了128GB UFS 2.0闪存和6GB大容量内存和骁龙处理器,这台设备完全可以和其他2016年以来的高端设备相抗衡。它的连接性功能包括了一个USB-C接口,可选的一直开启屏幕功能,和第二个SIM卡/microSD兼容插槽,这些都让它更方便使用。它搭配的两个高分辨率相机都表现十分不错。其中主相机更是支持速度很快的自动对焦系统。不过它也还有一些可以改进的方面,特别是暗光下的拍摄效果以及经常略带颗粒感的拍摄质量。高分辨率的AMOLED屏幕5.7寸的显示空间十分宽阔,由于仅全高清的分辨率,这台设备并不完全适合VR应用。华硕改进后的ZenUI 3.0界面带来了更多的功能,不过用户可能不是所有用户都会对它占用的19GB存储空间感到高兴。另外,一些竞争机型提供了比它更长的电池续航。

不需要对VR应用支持、喜欢它丰富的用户界面的用户,将会得到一台高品质的高端智能手机,华硕ZenFone 3 Deluxe的弱点屈指可数。

不过,它是否有足够的亮点来支持它799欧元(约5790人民币)的售价并不好说,特别是与一些正在降价的同类机型相对比的话。它并没有像三星 Galaxy S7 Edge一样的弧形屏幕边缘,也不支持联想 Moto Z风格的功能模块。它没有Apple iPhone的标志性地位,软件更新也不如谷歌Pixel XL及时。另一方面,需要更大屏幕的用户可能会更喜欢华为 Mate 9。但不论如何归功于先进的科技、双SIM卡功能和成熟的设计,ZenFone 3 Deluxe在高端机型中仍然是一台十分值得考虑的设备。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL - 02/16/2017 v6 (old)
Andreas Kilian

Chassis
91%
Keyboard
70 / 75 → 93%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
51 / 60 → 85%
Weight
90%
Battery
92%
Display
87%
Games Performance
62 / 63 → 98%
Application Performance
59 / 70 → 84%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Camera
76%
Average
79%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕 ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL 智能手机简短评测
Andreas Kilian, 2017-02-25 (Update: 2017-02-25)