华硕 ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A 平板电脑简短评测
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| SD Card Reader | |
| maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate | |
| average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate |
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 363 cd/m²
Contrast: 1396:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
78.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Xiaomi MiPad 2 IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9" | Amazon Fire HD 8 inch 2015 IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Huawei MediaPad M2 IPS LCD, 1920x1200, 8" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE Super AMOLED, 2048x1536, 8" | Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA IPS, 2048x1536, 8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 5% | -14% | -10% | 27% | -8% | |
| Brightness middle | 363 | 425 17% | 550 52% | 463 28% | 347 -4% | 369 2% |
| Brightness | 348 | 402 16% | 523 50% | 445 28% | 348 0% | 346 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 91 1% | 88 -2% | 92 2% | 88 -2% | 86 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.4 -54% | 0.53 -104% | 0.47 -81% | 0.37 -42% | |
| Contrast | 1396 | 1063 -24% | 1038 -26% | 985 -29% | 997 -29% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 4.98 14% | 7.77 -34% | 6.25 -8% | 1.67 71% | 5.58 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 17.8 | 6.61 63% | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.5 | 5.2 5% | 7.48 -36% | 6.16 -12% | 1.75 68% | 4.67 15% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.65 83% | 1.8 122% | 2.43 91% | 2.27 97% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 7388 88% | 7249 90% | 6633 98% | 7921 82% | 6361 102% | 7927 82% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 95.4 | 70 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 86 |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 80 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 58 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 357 Hz | ≤ 50 % brightness setting |  |
| ≤ 120 cd/m² brightness | |||
The display backlight flickers at 357 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % (120 cd/m²) and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 357 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. Flickering occurs at relatively low brightness settings, so extended use at this brightness setting or lower can cause eyestrain. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 inch 2015 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 inch 2015 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 inch 2015 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 inch 2015 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 inch 2015 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 inch 2015 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 inch 2015 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 inch 2015 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 inch 2015 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
* ... smaller is better
| Dead Trigger 2 - high | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne - high | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.16 / 0.17 Watt |
| Idle |  1.32 / 2.71 / 2.83 Watt |
| Load |
4.24 / 5.01 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A 4000 mAh | Xiaomi MiPad 2 6190 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 8 inch 2015 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M2 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE mAh | Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -11% | -29% | 17% | 5% | -30% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1305 | 832 -36% | 1546 18% | 1399 7% | 677 -48% | |
| H.264 | 624 | 541 -13% | 727 17% | 780 25% | 450 -28% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 472 | 421 -11% | 388 -18% | 525 11% | 442 -6% | 340 -28% |
| Load | 287 | 144 -50% | 343 20% | 265 -8% | 240 -16% |
Pros
Cons
华硕ZenPad 8.0 Z380M是一台十分优秀的设备。作为实惠型平板电脑，它在各个方面都达到了优秀的水平，超过很多更昂贵设备的表现。
特别是它的屏幕，让我们无可挑剔，加上长电池续航，ZenPad 8.0可以成为出色的日常伴侣。它的系统弥补了硬件性能的不足，提供了将一个个功能融合为整体的优秀互动界面。
我们的测试机由于可扩展性强十分适合一些特别用途：音频外壳可以让它变成便携音响，而结合高精度GPS和可选的电池外壳，它则完全可以作为长时间徒步的导航系统使用。
ZenPad 8.0几乎没有任何严重问题。它的无线网络性能受到没有对802.11ac的支持的影响（只是在最高传输速率方面；信号接收能力可以让人满意）。另外，仅仅200万像素的前置相机有一些形同虚设。
简单的说，以仅150欧元（约1121人民币）的售价，用户选择ZenPad 8.0几乎没有风险。如果需要更高屏幕分辨率或更强的计算性能，那么也可以考虑小米 MiPad 2或售价达两倍的三星Galaxy Tab S2 8.0。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
- 08/15/2016 v5.1 (old)
Oliver Moebel
Price comparison
