华硕 Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Brand: Asus

实用型全功能设备！ 这是华硕带来的又一款13.3寸Zenbook。搭配的Skylake处理器和独立显卡让它速度不俗。请阅读我们的详尽评测了解它是否也有弱点。

Sebastian Bade (translated by Yuchen Wang ), Published 12/10/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake Ultrabook Windows

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T (ZenBook UX310 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-6500U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Skylake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 1242 MHz, RAM: 900 MHz, DDR3 (Micron), ForceWare 375.86, Nvidia Optimus, HD Graphics 520

Memory

16 GB

, DDR4, 2133 MHz, 双通道

Display

13.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, AU Optronics AUO142D, TN LED, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH

Storage

SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, 256 GB

, SSD + HGST Travelstar HTS541010A7E630, 1000 GB 机械硬盘 @ 5400 rpm

Soundcard

Conexant SmartAudio HD

Connections

2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合音频接口, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 18.35 x 323 x 223

Battery

48 Wh, 4240 mAh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 高清 720p

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声，位于底部, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, Asus电脑包，电源适配器, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.466 kg, Power Supply: 170 g

Price

1199 EUR

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 HP Pavilion 14-al003ng Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK	77.8 MB/s +129%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng	73.7 MB/s +117%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500	73.1 MB/s +115%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T	34 MB/s
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T	30.3 MB/s -11%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK	87.1 MB/s +119%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500	83.3 MB/s +110%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng	80.8 MB/s +104%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T	39.7 MB/s
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T	37.3 MB/s -6%

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)	676 MBit/s
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	609 MBit/s -10%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	505 MBit/s -25%
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng Intel Wireless-AC 7265	439 MBit/s -35%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)	556 MBit/s
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	526 MBit/s -5%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)	421 MBit/s -24%
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng Intel Wireless-AC 7265	323 MBit/s -42%


255 cd/m²	232 cd/m²	237 cd/m²
248 cd/m²	247 cd/m²	246 cd/m²
232 cd/m²	235 cd/m²	230 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AU Optronics AUO142D tested with i1 Pro

Maximum: 255 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 240.2 cd/m² Minimum: 14.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 247 cd/m²
Contrast: 574:1 (Black: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.87 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
88.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.57

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T TN LED, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK a-Si WLED TFT, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 IPS-Panel, 2560x1440, 14"	HP Pavilion 14-al003ng LED IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Display			8%	9%
Display P3 Coverage	61.9		66 7%	66.9 8%
sRGB Coverage	88.3		95.5 8%	96.5 9%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	63		67.8 8%	68.8 9%
Response Times		-6%	-13%	113%	1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	39 ?(20, 19)	35 ?(16, 19) 10%	49 ?(20, 29) -26%	38.4 ?(14.8, 23.6) 2%	36.4 ?(18, 18.4) 7%
Response Time Black / White *	24 ?(7, 17)	31 ?(9, 22) -29%	27 ?(8, 19) -13%	24.8 ?(10.8, 14) -3%	25.2 ?(14, 11.2) -5%
PWM Frequency	50 ?(30)	50 ?(50) 0%	50 ?(30) 0%	220 340%
Screen		6%	35%	17%	-0%
Brightness middle	247	325 32%	347 40%	290 17%	220 -11%
Brightness	240	298 24%	334 39%	280 17%	209 -13%
Brightness Distribution	90	88 -2%	80 -11%	93 3%	88 -2%
Black Level *	0.43	0.35 19%	0.27 37%	0.31 28%	0.28 35%
Contrast	574	929 62%	1285 124%	935 63%	786 37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.74	6.2 -31%	3.29 31%	3.88 18%	4.58 3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.14	10.82 -18%	4.69 49%	8.19 10%	11.47 -25%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.87	6.32 -30%	3.62 26%	5.47 -12%	2.34 52%
Gamma	2.57 ^86%	2.3 ^96%	2.23 ^99%	2.33 ^94%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	7450 ^87%	6926 ^94%	7307 ^89%	6469 ^100%	6661 ^98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	57	58 2%	62 9%	63.3 11%	34.6 -39%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	88	90 2%	95 8%	96.64 10%	54.2 -38%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		0% / 3%	10% / 21%	46% / 33%	1% / 0%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20 ms rise
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

50 Hz

≤ 30 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 30 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

The viewing angles of the Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz	147 Points +13%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz	130 Points
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz	118 Points -9%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz	115 Points -12%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz	114 Points -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz	662 Points +102%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz	327 Points
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz	294 Points -10%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz	292 Points -11%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz	270 Points -17%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz	1.67 Points +13%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz	1.48 Points
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz	1.29 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz	1.21 Points -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz	7.42 Points +136%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz	3.23 Points +3%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz	3.21 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz	3.15 Points

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz	6407 Points
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz	5620 Points -12%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz	14075 Points
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz	12670 Points -10%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz	243.7 Points +17%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz	209 Points
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz	194.5 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz	178.1 Points -15%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz	165.2 Points -21%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz	37996 Points +28%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz	29762 Points
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz	25958 Points -13%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz	25149 Points -15%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz	1391 ms * -16%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz	1382 ms * -16%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz	1196 ms *
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz	994 ms * +17%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6502

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

10897

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

4904

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

6549 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

14075 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

6407 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

3.15 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

45.61 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.48 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

327 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

130 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

62.8 fps

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8 | PCMark 7

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	3769 Points
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	3337 Points -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP	3292 Points -13%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280	3238 Points -14%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	3144 Points -17%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	4603 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP	4463 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	4312 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	4274 Points -7%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	4440 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP	4241 Points -4%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	3961 Points -11%

PCMark 7
Productivity
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP	4840 Points +23%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	3933 Points
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	2481 Points -37%
Score
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP	5585 Points +5%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	5305 Points
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	4866 Points -8%

PCMark Vantage Result		13885 points
PCMark 7 Score		5305 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3769 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4440 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4603 points
Help

... in comparison

Sandisk delivers the SSD in the M.2 2280 format.

	Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP	HP Pavilion 14-al003ng SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		42%	109%	48%	-6%
Read Seq	468.1	508 9%	1209 158%	502 7%	469.3 0%
Write Seq	319.2	302.7 -5%	314 -2%	442 38%	309.1 -3%
Read 512	318.6	419.9 32%		411.4 29%
Write 512	272.8	302.6 11%		414.3 52%
Read 4k	22.03	33.3 51%	43.4 97%	29.18 32%	14 -36%
Write 4k	72.1	85.8 19%	153.4 113%	86.5 20%	73.9 2%
Read 4k QD32	147.4	395.8 169%	487.6 231%	358.1 143%	149.5 1%
Write 4k QD32	200.2	294.3 47%	312.2 56%	319.8 60%	204.6 2%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002

Transfer Rate Minimum: 52 MB/s

Transfer Rate Maximum: 107.1 MB/s

Transfer Rate Average: 84.8 MB/s

Access Time: 21.7 ms

Burst Rate: 241.4 MB/s

CPU Usage: 15.8 %

3DMark | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark 06

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	12078 Points +42%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	9230 Points +8%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	8552 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U	8519 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	2091 Points +32%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1718 Points +8%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U	1589 Points
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	1553 Points -2%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U	46764 Points
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	45561 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	43587 Points -7%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	2636 Points +14%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	2508 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	2417 Points +4%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U	2321 Points
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	2221 Points -4%
1280x720 Performance
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	2805 Points +16%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	2578 Points +6%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	2553 Points +5%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U	2424 Points
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	2330 Points -4%

3DMark 06 - 1280x1024 Standard Score AA:0x AF:0x
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	14195 Points +37%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	11658 Points +13%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U	10351 Points

3DMark 2001SE Standard		28793 points
3DMark 03 Standard		28408 points
3DMark 05 Standard		20654 points
3DMark 06 Standard Score		10351 points
3DMark 11 Performance		2424 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		44072 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		6264 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		1394 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		716 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		514 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	85.9	48.7	39.4	13.3
Battlefield 4 (2013)	67.2	43.8	29.1	10.7
The Witcher 3 (2015)	24	16.3	8.7	5.3

The small fan is not disturbing. — The small fan...

Noise Level

Idle		30.5 / 30.5 / 31.5 dB(A)
HDD		30.9 dB(A)
Load		36.2 / 40 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)

	Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T Intel Core i7-6500U, GeForce 940MX	Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK Intel Core i5-6200U, GeForce 940MX	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Intel Core i5-6200U, GeForce 940MX	Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 Intel Core i7-6700HQ, GeForce 940MX	HP Pavilion 14-al003ng Intel Core i5-6200U, GeForce 940MX
Noise		-7%	-3%	5%	-0%
off / environment *	30.5	32.2 -6%	31.15 -2%	29.2 4%	28.9 5%
Idle Minimum *	30.5	32.5 -7%	31.15 -2%	29.2 4%	29.2 4%
Idle Average *	30.5	34.6 -13%	31.15 -2%	29.2 4%	29.2 4%
Idle Maximum *	31.5	34.6 -10%	31.15 1%	29.2 7%	30.8 2%
Load Average *	36.2	38.7 -7%	38.2 -6%	33.5 7%	38 -5%
Load Maximum *	40	39.9 -0%	41.7 -4%	38.8 3%	44.3 -11%

* ... smaller is better

	Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T GeForce 940MX, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 GeForce 940MX, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP	HP Pavilion 14-al003ng GeForce 940MX, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280
Heat		-13%	-12%	-32%	-21%
Maximum Upper Side *	38.5	43.4 -13%	51 -32%	51.6 -34%	44.1 -15%
Maximum Bottom *	40.4	43.2 -7%	47 -16%	55.2 -37%	44.9 -11%
Idle Upper Side *	24.8	28 -13%	24.4 2%	30.7 -24%	32.4 -31%
Idle Bottom *	23.8	28.2 -18%	24.6 -3%	31.5 -32%	30.2 -27%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


31.8 °C	38.5 °C	33.3 °C
34.6 °C	38.4 °C	28.4 °C
27.7 °C	25.2 °C	27 °C

Maximum: 38.5 °C
Average: 31.7 °C


34.6 °C	40.4 °C	34.5 °C
31.3 °C	36 °C	33.5 °C
28.4 °C	29.1 °C	29.8 °C

Maximum: 40.4 °C
Average: 33.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 53 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.6 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.7 °C / 81.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+0.6 °C / 1 F).

The speaker grills are on the front side.

The two speakers stem from Harman/Kardon. — The two speakers...

Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.28 / 0.62 Watt
Idle	3 / 5.6 / 6.8 Watt
Load	48.7 / 63 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T 6500U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, TN LED, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK 6200U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP, a-Si WLED TFT, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 6200U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 6700HQ, GeForce 940MX, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP, IPS-Panel, 2560x1440, 14"	HP Pavilion 14-al003ng 6200U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280, LED IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Power Consumption		-31%	-6%	-51%	-8%
Idle Minimum *	3	4.9 -63%	4 -33%	5 -67%	4 -33%
Idle Average *	5.6	9.4 -68%	6.6 -18%	9.9 -77%	6.4 -14%
Idle Maximum *	6.8	10.7 -57%	7.4 -9%	10.8 -59%	7 -3%
Load Average *	48.7	46 6%	41.7 14%	52.4 -8%	45.5 7%
Load Maximum *	63	47.2 25%	52.4 17%	89.8 -43%	62.2 1%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		14h 38min
WiFi Websurfing (EDGE: 38.14393.0.0)		8h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		6h 59min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 43min

	Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T 6500U, GeForce 940MX, 48 Wh	Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK 6200U, GeForce 940MX, 53 Wh	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 6200U, GeForce 940MX, 40 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 6700HQ, GeForce 940MX, 48 Wh	HP Pavilion 14-al003ng 6200U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh
Battery Runtime		11%	-14%	-30%	-32%
Reader / Idle	878	958 9%	718 -18%	660 -25%
H.264	419	424 1%	423 1%	357 -15%
WiFi v1.3	486	433 -11%	389 -20%	298 -39%	329 -32%
Load	103	147 43%	83 -19%	61 -41%

Pros

+ 优秀的电池续航

+ 丰富的接口

+ 背光键盘

+ 大尺寸触控版

+ 附赠笔记本保护套

+ 独立显卡

+ 高系统性能

+ 坚固的机身

+ 雅致简洁的设计

Cons

- 较差的屏幕品质

- 50赫兹屏幕闪烁

- 可视角度范围窄

- 按键反馈僵硬

- 屏幕转轴不稳定

In review: the Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T. Test model provided by Asus Germany.

华硕的Zenbook系列向来以轻盈便携闻名，我们也完全认同这台华硕UX310UQ很好地延续了这个优势。Zenbook UX310UQ是华硕带来的一台续航能力很强的亚笔记本电脑，它采用了高端材质，机身品质优良。我们的测试机配置售价约1200欧元（约8752人民币），提供了优秀的系统性能和很长的电池续航。

第一眼看上去华硕Zenbook UX310UQ显得十分高端。较轻的重量和长续航时间也让这台设备十分适合日常便携使用。这台雅致的设备需要用户拿出1200欧元（约8752人民币）的预算。

它的内置TN屏幕让我们十分失望。在这个价位的设备应该配备更好的屏幕。它的输入设备也不能完全让人满意。因此Zenbook UX310UQ可能不会让需要长时间编辑文档的用户一直高兴。随机附赠的保护套是个小优势。另外，华硕在连接性上考虑得十分周全。作为一台13寸的设备，它提供了可用于连接外设的丰富接口。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T - 2016-12-06 12/06/2016 v6 ^(old)
Sebastian Bade

Chassis

81 / 98 → 83%

Keyboard

81%

Pointing Device

75%

Connectivity

53 / 80 → 67%

Weight

69 / 35-78 → 79%

Battery

89%

Display

82%

Games Performance

62 / 68 → 91%

Application Performance

86 / 87 → 98%

Temperature

94 / 91 → 100%

Noise

90%

Audio

59 / 91 → 65%

Camera

64 / 85 → 75%

Average

76%

84%

Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕 Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T 笔记本电脑简短评测

Sebastian Bade, 2016-12-10 (Update: 2016-12-11)