Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar华硕Zenfone Max Pro M2智能手机评测
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro | |
| Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL | |
| Honor 10 Lite | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL | |
| Honor 10 Lite | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 511 cd/m²
Contrast: 1043:1 (Black: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 8.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 3.31
| Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL 2280x1080, 6.3" | Honor 10 Lite IPS, 2340x1080, 6.2" | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6" | Motorola Moto G7 Plus IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 20% | 45% | 4% | |
| Brightness middle | 511 | 467 -9% | 570 12% | 537 5% |
| Brightness | 494 | 446 -10% | 565 14% | 525 6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 89 1% | 93 6% | 85 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.49 | 0.58 -18% | 0.58 -18% | |
| Contrast | 1043 | 805 -23% | 926 -11% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.3 | 1.5 82% | 1.5 82% | 6.41 23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.6 | 4.5 64% | 3.6 71% | 10.86 14% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.1 | 2.4 70% | 1.2 85% | 6.7 17% |
| Gamma | 3.31 66% | 2.22 99% | 2.07 106% | 2.099 105% |
| CCT | 7648 85% | 6387 102% | 6504 100% | 8310 78% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2336 Hz | ≤ 20 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2336 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2336 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 55.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 28.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 (Chrome 68) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| BlackBerry Key2 (Chrome 67) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67) | |
| Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL (Chrome 71) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 (Chrome 68) | |
| BlackBerry Key2 (Chrome 67) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67) | |
| Oppo R11 | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67) | |
| Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL (Chrome 71) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67) | |
| Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL (Chrome 71) | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| BlackBerry Key2 (Chrome 67) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 (Chrome 68) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL (Chrome 71) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 (Chrome 68) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Adreno 512, SD 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Adreno 512, SD 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash | BlackBerry Key2 Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Xiaomi Mi 6X Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash | BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Nokia 7 Plus Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -21% | 6% | 4% | -26% | -25% | -29% | -25% | |
| Random Write 4KB | 88.2 | 18.75 -79% | 19.79 -78% | 77.9 -12% | 17.18 -81% | 6.89 -92% | 15.43 -83% | 19.62 -78% |
| Random Read 4KB | 74.9 | 81.3 9% | 116.8 56% | 94.2 26% | 56.8 -24% | 73 -3% | 51.3 -32% | 54.7 -27% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 198.9 | 172.4 -13% | 194.6 -2% | 207.9 5% | 208.4 5% | 203.7 2% | 204.8 3% | 211.6 6% |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 285.5 | 282.6 -1% | 426.6 49% | 277.6 -3% | 273.1 -4% | 272 -5% | 280.8 -2% | 283.1 -1% |
| Asphalt 9: Legends - High Quality | |
| Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512 (28 - 30, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | |
| Arena of Valor - high HD | |
| BlackBerry Key2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512 (30 - 60, n=3) | |
| Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL | |
| PUBG Mobile | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| Balanced | 30 fps | ||
| HD | 30 fps | ||
| Asphalt 9: Legends | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| High Quality | 30 fps | ||
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high HD | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 63.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 63.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 63.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (121% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.01 / 0.14 Watt |
| Idle |  0.76 / 2.18 / 2.22 Watt |
| Load |
3.47 / 7.22 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL 5000 mAh | Honor 10 Lite 3400 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh | Motorola Moto G7 Plus 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -48% | -35% | -23% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 928 | 484 -48% | 605 -35% | 715 -23% |
| Reader / Idle | 1533 | 1467 | ||
| H.264 | 502 | 836 | 809 | |
| Load | 178 | 273 | 196 |
| Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL 5000 mAh | Honor 10 Lite 3400 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh | Motorola Moto G7 Plus 3000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -14% | 4% | -15% | -32% | -15% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.76 | 1 -32% | 0.71 7% | 1.1 -45% | 1.052 ? -38% | 0.895 ? -18% |
| Idle Average * | 2.18 | 2.19 -0% | 1.36 38% | 1.7 22% | 2.62 ? -20% | 1.447 ? 34% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.22 | 2.2 1% | 1.47 34% | 2.1 5% | 2.88 ? -30% | 1.608 ? 28% |
| Load Average * | 3.47 | 4.64 -34% | 5.13 -48% | 5.1 -47% | 5.1 ? -47% | 6.41 ? -85% |
| Load Maximum * | 7.22 | 7.7 -7% | 7.89 -9% | 7.9 -9% | 9.08 ? -26% | 9.61 ? -33% |
* ... smaller is better
Pros
Cons
作者已经将ZenFone Max Pro（M2）作为日常用机进行了大约一个月的体验评测，并且该手机已经达到了最高的期望值。手机的玻璃背板设计并不是我们经常在这个价格范围内看到的，只要你保持清洁，视觉效果肯定很不错。显示效果鲜艳，Gorilla Glass 6保护有助于防止划伤。在整体设计方面，你所花费的购机费用还附带了许多出人意料的小特色，使其在人群中脱颖而出。
理论和现实的整体表现都令人满意。在分数方面，低频SoC可能看起来令人失望，但它不应该对日常的使用产生负面影响，例如通话，文本，社交网络，照片/视频，甚至是中等游戏。话虽如此，SoC确实在持续负载下经历了可感知的降频。我们认为通过固件优化可以缓解其中一些问题。
华硕ZenFone Max Pro（M2）提供的性能与昔日的旗舰性能相匹配，设计现代，价格也很有竞争力。 ZenFone Max Pro（M2）具有非常好的显示效果，高于平均水平的摄像头以及及时的更新，是最优惠的中档智能手机，价格低于₹15,000（US $ 200，1500元），是一台旗舰杀手。
华硕似乎已经吸收了ZenFone Max Pro（M1）收到的反馈，并根据Max Pro（M2）中的用户建议实施了改进。它并不完美，但我们很高兴能做出改变。随着我们进一步进入2019年，我们预计看到华硕和别的品牌竞争，并提供更低的200美元以下的旗舰级功能。
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
-
03/28/2019 v6 (old)
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam
Price comparison
