华硕Zephyrus S GX531GX (i7-8750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q) 笔记本电脑评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus Strix GL504GM | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX | |
Aorus 15 X9 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX | |
Asus Strix GL504GM | |
Aorus 15 X9 |
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 323.6 cd/m²
Contrast: 1116:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.31 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.73
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Aorus 15 X9 LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q AU Optronics B156HAN, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus Strix GL504GM AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus GX501 AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | -3% | 1% | 0% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 65.6 | 64.9 -1% | 63.5 -3% | 65.3 0% | 65.3 0% | 64.8 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 92.2 | 95.6 4% | 89.4 -3% | 94.9 3% | 92.8 1% | 91.8 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.9 | 66.3 -1% | 64.5 -4% | 66.3 -1% | 66.7 0% | 65.9 -1% |
Response Times | -73% | -91% | -81% | -10% | -314% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 7 ? | 15.2 ? -117% | 18 ? -157% | 16.8 ? -140% | 7.8 ? -11% | 40.4 ? -477% |
Response Time Black / White * | 9.6 ? | 12.4 ? -29% | 12 ? -25% | 11.6 ? -21% | 10.4 ? -8% | 24 ? -150% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | 3% | -12% | 0% | -11% | -26% | |
Brightness middle | 323.6 | 305.1 -6% | 353.6 9% | 314.7 -3% | 350 8% | 328 1% |
Brightness | 315 | 295 -6% | 346 10% | 312 -1% | 338 7% | 305 -3% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 78 -14% | 86 -5% | 90 -1% | 90 -1% | 83 -9% |
Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.33 -14% | 0.3 -3% | 0.38 -31% | 0.33 -14% | 0.25 14% |
Contrast | 1116 | 925 -17% | 1179 6% | 828 -26% | 1061 -5% | 1312 18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.31 | 2.58 22% | 4.55 -37% | 2.56 23% | 4.3 -30% | 6.02 -82% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.74 | 4.32 25% | 7.91 -38% | 4.89 15% | 7.78 -36% | 10.14 -77% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.73 | 1.33 51% | 3.37 -23% | 1.71 37% | 2.83 -4% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 3.4 -17% | 4.1 -41% | 3.4 -17% | 4.4 -52% | 6.32 -118% |
Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.28 96% | 2.27 97% | 2.3 96% | 2.26 97% | 2.28 96% |
CCT | 6765 96% | 6374 102% | 7434 87% | 6435 101% | 7517 86% | 8194 79% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59.7 | 60.7 2% | 57.9 -3% | 60.7 2% | 60 1% | 60 1% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91.8 | 95.2 4% | 88.9 -3% | 94.6 3% | 92.5 1% | 92 0% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -23% /
-7% | -35% /
-20% | -27% /
-10% | -7% /
-9% | -114% /
-59% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise | |
↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.6 ms rise | |
↘ 3.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
Aorus 15 X9 | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS | |
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (3979 - 5107, n=3) | |
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
Asus Strix GL504GM | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Aorus 15 X9 | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (5289 - 5882, n=3) | |
Asus Strix GL504GM | |
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3979 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5289 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5492 points | |
Help |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Aorus 15 X9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Strix GL504GM Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 40% | 83% | 20% | 50% | |
Seq Read | 1239 | 1912 54% | 1840 49% | 1433 16% | 903 -27% |
Seq Write | 920 | 1553 69% | 1822 98% | 1071 16% | 1261 37% |
4K Read | 45.74 | 56.5 24% | 52.3 14% | 32 -30% | 40.02 -13% |
4K Write | 95.7 | 119.6 25% | 110.7 16% | 96.5 1% | 103.6 8% |
4K-64 Read | 322 | 869 170% | 1126 250% | 832 158% | 1030 220% |
4K-64 Write | 722 | 584 -19% | 1717 138% | 520 -28% | 1285 78% |
Access Time Read * | 0.073 | 0.049 33% | 0.047 36% | 0.072 1% | 0.129 -77% |
Access Time Write * | 0.047 | 0.031 34% | 0.033 30% | 0.045 4% | 0.036 23% |
Score Read | 492 | 1116 127% | 1362 177% | 1007 105% | 1161 136% |
Score Write | 910 | 859 -6% | 2010 121% | 724 -20% | 1515 66% |
Score Total | 1654 | 2544 54% | 4079 147% | 2233 35% | 3294 99% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1236 | 1329 8% | 1975 60% | 1006 -19% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 703 | 404.3 -42% | 526 -25% | 752 7% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 812 | 1071 32% | 1200 48% | 1088 34% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC | |
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (23386 - 30910, n=20) | |
Aorus 15 X9 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
MSI GL73 8SE-010US | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS | |
Asus Strix GL504GM | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (9212 - 14894, n=20) | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX | |
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
Asus Strix GL504GM | |
MSI GL73 8SE-010US | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
Aorus 15 X9 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 21324 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 32978 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 17774 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 7688 points | |
Help |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (65.7 - 92.7, n=22) | |
Asus Chimera G703GI | |
Aorus 15 X9 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
MSI GL73 8SE-010US | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS | |
Asus Strix GL504GM | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD | |
Asus TUF FX505DY | |
Asus FX504GD |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 276.8 | 246.7 | 232.3 | 166 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 263.4 | 215.2 | 142 | 80.3 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 215 | 163.6 | 146.5 | 124 |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Aorus 15 X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Strix GL504GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -0% | 8% | 13% | 7% | 5% | -4% | |
off / environment * | 28.7 | 28.2 2% | 28.6 -0% | 28.8 -0% | 28.5 1% | 31 -8% | 29 -1% |
Idle Minimum * | 29.8 | 32.6 -9% | 28.6 4% | 28.8 3% | 30 -1% | 32 -7% | 33 -11% |
Idle Average * | 32.4 | 32.7 -1% | 28.6 12% | 28.8 11% | 30 7% | 33 -2% | 34 -5% |
Idle Maximum * | 38 | 32.7 14% | 28.6 25% | 29.4 23% | 30 21% | 34 11% | 40 -5% |
Load Average * | 38.2 | 38.9 -2% | 40.8 -7% | 35.7 7% | 41.8 -9% | 39 -2% | 47 -23% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 56.6 | 51.8 8% | 49.6 12% | 42.5 25% | 47.6 16% | 42 26% | 51 10% |
Load Maximum * | 56.6 | 64.1 -13% | 49.6 12% | 45 20% | 50 12% | 46 19% | 53 6% |
* ... smaller is better
Noise Level
Idle |
| 29.8 / 32.4 / 38 dB(A) |
Load |
| 38.2 / 56.6 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 28.7 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.6 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.4 °C / 92.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.5 °C / -8.1 F).
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.37 / 0.98 Watt |
Idle | 16.1 / 20.9 / 27 Watt |
Load |
93.4 / 215.3 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Aorus 15 X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Strix GL504GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus GX501 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -25% | -3% | 22% | 18% | -0% | |
Idle Minimum * | 16.1 | 26 -61% | 17 -6% | 10.4 35% | 10 38% | 18 -12% |
Idle Average * | 20.9 | 30.8 -47% | 20 4% | 14.6 30% | 16.9 19% | 23 -10% |
Idle Maximum * | 27 | 34.9 -29% | 29 -7% | 16.3 40% | 21.1 22% | 31 -15% |
Load Average * | 93.4 | 90.7 3% | 112 -20% | 88.5 5% | 112.4 -20% | 79 15% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 168.2 | 175 -4% | 152 10% | 155.4 8% | 135.5 19% | 148 12% |
Load Maximum * | 215.3 | 241.2 -12% | 211 2% | 182.4 15% | 157.3 27% | 196 9% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 50 Wh | Aorus 15 X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh | Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 90 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80 Wh | Asus Strix GL504GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 66 Wh | Asus Zephyrus GX501 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 50 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -48% | 156% | 114% | 96% | -28% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 181 | 95 -48% | 463 156% | 387 114% | 355 96% | 130 -28% |
Reader / Idle | 105 | 627 | 682 | 188 | ||
Load | 61 | 103 | 88 | 44 |
Pros
Cons
GX531在几个关键领域表现出色。除了具有窄边框的超薄机身外,核心温度比我们预期的更低,屏幕比GX501改进很多,尤其在拖影方面。当然,底盘的独特设计意味着令人不舒服的高温按键永远不会成为问题。与GTX 1080 Max-Q相比,用户可以从RTX 2080 Max-Q获得17%到45%的性能提升。
不过仍有很大的改进空间。屏幕下巴非常大,风扇噪音比MSI GS65或Razer Blade 15更大。在最大风扇的Turbo模式下运行笔记本电脑才能得到最大性能,而平衡模式将导致10%的性能损失。必须通过Armory Crate应用程序切换这些电源设置,因为它们独立于标准Windows电源配置文件运行。
其他缺失的功能包括RJ-45,SD卡读卡器,单键RGB照明和雷电3,我们认为这应该是价格高达20000元以上的旗舰游戏笔记本电脑的标准配置。游戏爱好者可能更愿意使用G-Sync代替Optimus,因为即使可以使用图形切换,这台电脑的电池续航时间也已达到平均水平。薄机身意味着不会有机械硬盘,这对于拥有大型游戏库的用户来说可能是一个问题。
由于GX531的缺点,我们建议用户改为使用华硕ROG GL504系列。我们发现通过更稳固的键盘按键,更坚硬的A面,更多存储选项,更多端口以及更大的触控板可以更好地平衡它们。它甚至与GX531共享完全相同的IPS面板。这是一个更厚的选择,但我们发现它的其他便利功能非常值得。
在性能,重量,厚度和外观方面,相较旧款GX501进行了重大升级。 GX531是迄今为止华硕最具视觉冲击力的15.6英寸游戏笔记本电脑,但它不得不牺牲一些有用的功能来达到如此轻薄的外形。
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
- 09/20/2019 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo