Notebookcheck Logo

苹果iPad Pro 11(2018款,Wi-Fi版,64 GB)平板电脑评测

最新评测。

新iPad Pro经过了全新的设计和升级,尝试证明自己有成为一台生产力工具的实力。不过,要证明自己并不那么简单。我们的这次评测针对的是稍小一些的11寸型号。
Apple ARM iPad Pro Touchscreen Tablet
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (iPad Pro Series)
Processor
Apple A12X Bionic 8 x - 2.5 GHz, Vortex, Tempest
Graphics adapter
Apple A12X Bionic GPU
Memory
4 GB 
Display
11.00 inch 2.86:2, 2388 x 1668 pixel 265 PPI, 电容触摸屏, Liquid Retina Display, IPS, ProMotion自适应刷新率技术;广色域显示 (P3);原彩显示, glossy: yes
Storage
TSB3247M61710TWNA1 64GB NVMe, 64 GB 
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB Type-C音频输出, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 亮度传感器,加速传感器,陀螺仪,晴雨表,指南针, 智能连接器
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.9 x 248 x 179
Battery
29.4 Wh, 7736 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Apple iOS 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix 4-LED 原彩闪光灯,自动对焦, OIS
Secondary Camera: 7 MPix 视网膜屏闪光灯,动话表情和拟我表情
Additional features
Speakers: 四扬声器系统, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘,键盘式智能双面夹需另外购买, 充电器;USB Type-A转Type-C转接线, Swift Playgrounds, Clips, Siri, Photo Booth, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
468 g, Power Supply: 74 g
Price
6499 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Apple iPad Pro 11 (2018)
Apple iPad Pro 11 (2018)
Apple iPad Pro 11 (2018)
Apple iPad Pro 11 (2018)
Apple iPad Pro 11 (2018)
Apple iPad Pro 11 (2018)
Apple iPad Pro 11 (2018)
Apple iPad Pro 11 (2018)
Apple iPad Pro 11 (2018)
Apple iPad Pro 11 (2018)
Apple iPad Pro 11 (2018)
Apple iPad Pro 11 (2018)
Apple iPad Pro 11 (2018)
Apple iPad Pro 11 (2018)
Apple iPad Pro 11 (2018)

Size Comparison

292 mm 201 mm 8.5 mm 1.1 kg280.6 mm 214.9 mm 5.9 mm 633 g258.7 mm 171.8 mm 7.3 mm 498 g250.6 mm 174.1 mm 6.1 mm 469 g249 mm 164 mm 7 mm 482 g248 mm 179 mm 5.9 mm 468 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
A12X Bionic GPU, A12X Bionic, 256 GB NVMe
643 (596min - 662max) MBit/s +32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
580 MBit/s +19%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
559 (519min - 577max) MBit/s +15%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
497 MBit/s +2%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
A12X Bionic GPU, A12X Bionic, TSB3247M61710TWNA1 64GB NVMe
488 (262min - 543max) MBit/s
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
238 MBit/s -51%
iperf3 receive AX12
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
593 (560min - 611max) MBit/s +10%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
A12X Bionic GPU, A12X Bionic, 256 GB NVMe
590 (549min - 608max) MBit/s +10%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
A12X Bionic GPU, A12X Bionic, TSB3247M61710TWNA1 64GB NVMe
537 (397min - 559max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
528 MBit/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
290 MBit/s -46%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
236 MBit/s -56%
0306090120150180210240270300330360390420450480510540Tooltip
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø537 (397-559)
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø488 (262-543)
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 520 – Cycling through a grove
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 520 – Cycling through a grove
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS Test: Apple iPad Pro 11 (2018) - Overview
GPS Test: Apple iPad Pro 11 (2018) - Overview
GPS Test: Apple iPad Pro 11 (2018) – Cycling through a grove
GPS Test: Apple iPad Pro 11 (2018) – Cycling through a grove
GPS Test: Apple iPad Pro 11 (2018) - Bridge
GPS Test: Apple iPad Pro 11 (2018) - Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
Our test chart in detail
ColorChecker: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour
ColorChecker: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour
581
cd/m²
604
cd/m²
576
cd/m²
611
cd/m²
639
cd/m²
621
cd/m²
557
cd/m²
572
cd/m²
560
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Liquid Retina Display tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 639 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 591.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.94 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 639 cd/m²
Contrast: 1420:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.92 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
IPS, 2388x1668, 11"
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3"
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
IPS, 2224x1668, 10.5"
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
IPS, 2732x2048, 12.9"
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5"
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8"
Screen
-94%
-30%
4%
-66%
-217%
Brightness middle
639
484
-24%
634
-1%
632
-1%
474
-26%
384
-40%
Brightness
591
473
-20%
625
6%
605
2%
477
-19%
360
-39%
Brightness Distribution
87
91
5%
87
0%
91
5%
91
5%
84
-3%
Black Level *
0.45
0.33
27%
0.39
13%
0.32
29%
0.8
-78%
Contrast
1420
1467
3%
1626
15%
1975
39%
480
-66%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.92
4.29
-366%
1.9
-107%
1.1
-20%
2.5
-172%
6.83
-642%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.59
6.46
-149%
3.9
-51%
2.4
7%
5.8
-124%
12.7
-390%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.3
4.3
-231%
2.8
-115%
1.7
-31%
2.1
-62%
7.5
-477%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.51 88%
2.26 97%
2.21 100%
2.08 106%
2.199 100%
CCT
6656 98%
7315 89%
7027 93%
6794 96%
6281 103%
8544 76%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.34
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
95

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
54 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms rise
↘ 29 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
5002 Points 0%
Average Apple A12X Bionic (4984 - 5002, n=2)
4993 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
4984 Points
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
3933 Points -21%
Average of class Tablet (745 - 9443, n=15, last 2 years)
3721 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
1893 Points -62%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
1892 Points -62%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
18041 Points
Average Apple A12X Bionic (17691 - 18041, n=2)
17866 Points -1%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
17691 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet (1418 - 30983, n=15, last 2 years)
10683 Points -41%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
9358 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6477 Points -64%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
6173 Points -66%
Compute RenderScript Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
43802 Points
Average Apple A12X Bionic (41735 - 43802, n=2)
42769 Points -2%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
41735 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
7930 Points -82%
Average of class Tablet (2128 - 10799, n=7, last 2 years)
7758 Points -82%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6954 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
6830 Points
Work 2.0 performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6315 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
6039 Points
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
3558 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3490 Points
Average of class Tablet (361 - 14235, n=47, last 2 years)
2050 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
1771 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
4537 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3682 Points
Average of class Tablet (290 - 24605, n=47, last 2 years)
2176 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
1646 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2952 Points
Average of class Tablet (858 - 5751, n=47, last 2 years)
2796 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2416 Points
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
2027 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (267 - 17674, n=67, last 2 years)
4452 Points
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
3975 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3753 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
1980 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (240 - 29325, n=67, last 2 years)
5806 Points
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
5459 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
4086 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
1885 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (441 - 7451, n=67, last 2 years)
3620 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2919 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2405 Points
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
2036 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
120 fps
Average Apple A12X Bionic (119.9 - 120, n=2)
120 fps 0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
119.9 fps 0%
Average of class Tablet (14 - 144, n=67, last 2 years)
63.9 fps -47%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
59 fps -51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
58 fps -52%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
57 fps -52%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
451 fps
Average Apple A12X Bionic (438 - 451, n=2)
445 fps -1%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
438.4 fps -3%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
225 fps -50%
Average of class Tablet (15 - 809, n=67, last 2 years)
187.6 fps -58%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
93 fps -79%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
69 fps -85%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
110 fps
Average Apple A12X Bionic (95.6 - 110, n=2)
102.8 fps -7%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
95.6 fps -13%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
58 fps -47%
Average of class Tablet (8.1 - 122, n=67, last 2 years)
52.1 fps -53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
36 fps -67%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
27 fps -75%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
220.1 fps +9%
Average Apple A12X Bionic (202 - 220, n=2)
211 fps +4%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
202 fps
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
109 fps -46%
Average of class Tablet (7.3 - 530, n=67, last 2 years)
108.9 fps -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
60 fps -70%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
41 fps -80%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
95 fps
Average Apple A12X Bionic (59.3 - 95, n=2)
77.2 fps -19%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
59.3 fps -38%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
43 fps -55%
Average of class Tablet (4.8 - 120, n=67, last 2 years)
39.4 fps -59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
22 fps -77%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
16 fps -83%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
173 fps +2%
Average Apple A12X Bionic (169 - 173, n=2)
171 fps +1%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
169 fps
Average of class Tablet (5 - 400, n=67, last 2 years)
78.2 fps -54%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
63 fps -63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
41 fps -76%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
28 fps -83%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
47 fps
Average Apple A12X Bionic (39.2 - 47, n=2)
43.1 fps -8%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
39.2 fps -17%
Average of class Tablet (3.1 - 117.9, n=66, last 2 years)
24.6 fps -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
13 fps -72%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
9.3 fps -80%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
107 fps +6%
Average Apple A12X Bionic (101 - 107, n=2)
104 fps +3%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
101 fps
Average of class Tablet (2.2 - 284, n=66, last 2 years)
46.4 fps -54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
25 fps -75%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
16 fps -84%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
49 fps
Average Apple A12X Bionic (31.8 - 49, n=2)
40.4 fps -18%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
31.8 fps -35%
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 106.4, n=78, last 2 years)
18.6 fps -62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
8.9 fps -82%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
51.1 fps +6%
Average Apple A12X Bionic (48 - 51.1, n=2)
49.6 fps +3%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
48 fps
Average of class Tablet (0.9 - 114.5, n=78, last 2 years)
21 fps -56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
9.3 fps -81%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
58 fps
Average Apple A12X Bionic (47.2 - 58, n=2)
52.6 fps -9%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
47.2 fps -19%
Average of class Tablet (3 - 120, n=78, last 2 years)
26.9 fps -54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
14 fps -76%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
134.3 fps +6%
Average Apple A12X Bionic (127 - 134.3, n=2)
130.7 fps +3%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
127 fps
Average of class Tablet (2.5 - 340, n=78, last 2 years)
55 fps -57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
25 fps -80%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
566378 Points
Average Apple A12X Bionic (552676 - 566378, n=2)
559527 Points -1%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
552676 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
201881 Points -64%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
175581 Points -69%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
8450 Points +12%
Average Apple A12X Bionic (7526 - 8450, n=2)
7988 Points +6%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
7526 Points
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)
4210 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3302 Points -56%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2204 Points -71%
System
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
16467 Points +1%
Average Apple A12X Bionic (16298 - 16467, n=2)
16383 Points +1%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
16298 Points
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)
7279 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
5537 Points -66%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
3639 Points -78%
Memory
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
5423 Points +60%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)
4874 Points +44%
Average Apple A12X Bionic (3390 - 5423, n=2)
4407 Points +30%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
3390 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
3108 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2900 Points -14%
Graphics
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
28853 Points +1%
Average Apple A12X Bionic (28547 - 28853, n=2)
28700 Points +1%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
28547 Points
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)
9171 Points -68%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6080 Points -79%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2284 Points -92%
Web
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
2034 Points
Average Apple A12X Bionic (1979 - 2034, n=2)
2007 Points -1%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
1979 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)
1269 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
1218 Points -40%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
913 Points -55%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
5300 Points +2%
Average Apple A12X Bionic (5216 - 5300, n=2)
5258 Points +1%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
5216 Points
Average of class Tablet (309 - 3806, n=10, last 2 years)
1440 Points -72%
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1
System
Average of class Tablet (4131 - 18868, n=4, last 2 years)
12561 Points +73%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
7242 Points
Average Apple A12X Bionic (5279 - 7242, n=2)
6261 Points -14%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
5920 Points -18%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
5279 Points -27%
CPU Tests
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
759975 Points 0%
Average Apple A12X Bionic (756889 - 759975, n=2)
758432 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
756889 Points
Average of class Tablet (2085 - 591842, n=4, last 2 years)
152033 Points -80%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
82859 Points -89%
Disk Tests
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
179053 Points +28%
Average Apple A12X Bionic (140131 - 179053, n=2)
159592 Points +14%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
140131 Points
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
44272 Points -68%
Average of class Tablet (6456 - 93856, n=4, last 2 years)
37266 Points -73%
Memory Tests
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
31708000 Points +99812%
Average Apple A12X Bionic (31736 - 31708000, n=2)
15869868 Points +49906%
Average of class Tablet (14798 - 94056, n=4, last 2 years)
53915 Points +70%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
31736 Points
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
27749 Points -13%
2D Graphics Tests
Average of class Tablet (8097 - 52017, n=4, last 2 years)
23367 Points +57%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
14847 Points
Average Apple A12X Bionic (13777 - 14847, n=2)
14312 Points -4%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
13777 Points -7%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
5203 Points -65%
3D Graphics Tests
Average of class Tablet (3997 - 57127, n=4, last 2 years)
23085 Points +1845%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
1187 Points
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
1186 Points 0%
Average Apple A12X Bionic (847 - 1187, n=2)
1017 Points -14%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
847 Points -29%

Legend

 
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 Apple A12X Bionic, Apple A12X Bionic GPU, TSB3247M61710TWNA1 64GB NVMe
 
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB Intel Core i7-8650U, Intel UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
 
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 Apple A10X Fusion, Apple A10X Fusion GPU / PowerVR, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
 
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 Apple A12X Bionic, Apple A12X Bionic GPU, 256 GB NVMe
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 (Safari Mobile 12)
279.1 Points +1%
Average Apple A12X Bionic (278 - 279, n=2)
278 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13)
277.7 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
234 Points -16%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 (Safari Mobile 10)
200.6 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0)
65.1 Points -77%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91)
57 Points -79%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 (Safari Mobile 12)
45734 Points +3%
Average Apple A12X Bionic (44425 - 45734, n=2)
45080 Points +1%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13)
44425 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
32487 Points -27%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 (Safari Mobile 10)
30333 Points -32%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)
28653 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0)
12897 Points -71%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91)
11854 Points -73%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)
3789 ms * -528%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91)
3575 ms * -493%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0)
2645 ms * -339%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
1177 ms * -95%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 (Safari Mobile 10)
973 ms * -61%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 (Safari Mobile 12)
614 ms * -2%
Average Apple A12X Bionic (603 - 614, n=2)
609 ms * -1%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13)
603 ms *
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 (Safari Mobile 12)
182 Points +6%
Average Apple A12X Bionic (172 - 182, n=2)
177 Points +3%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13)
172 Points
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)
149.6 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0)
77 Points -55%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91)
68 Points -60%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13)
386 Points
Average Apple A12X Bionic (380 - 386, n=2)
383 Points -1%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 (Safari Mobile 12)
380 Points -2%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 (Safari Mobile 10)
257 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0)
187 Points -52%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91)
178 Points -54%

* ... smaller is better

Asphalt 9: Legends
 SettingsValue
 High Quality29 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Shadow Fight 3
 SettingsValue
 high59 fps
 minimal59 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 SettingsValue
 min60 fps
 high HD59 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Max. Load
 32 °C33.4 °C31.7 °C 
 32.9 °C37.9 °C31.7 °C 
 33.2 °C34.5 °C32.8 °C 
Maximum: 37.9 °C
Average: 33.3 °C
33.2 °C36.9 °C33.9 °C
34.5 °C34.3 °C35.1 °C
33.4 °C35.5 °C33.6 °C
Maximum: 36.9 °C
Average: 34.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Heat map of the front of the device under load
Heat map of the front of the device under load
Heat map of the back of the device under load
Heat map of the back of the device under load
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.633.52537.537.43135.837.84037.935.65039.134.76330.232.58030.231.810028.4411252451.916023.756.220022.662.225021.666.531519.866.540019.468.550019.96963018.368.880019.466.5100018.56712501866.2160018.468.1200018.167.1250018.367.4315017.964.4400017.965.3500017.662630017.965.8800017.770.11000017.864.31250017.958.91600017.957.1SPL60.830.578.7N15.91.448.7median 18.3median 65.8median 63.7Delta36.51531.641.125.436.925.335.832.934.533.630.731.632.128.429.92742.520.850.12253.221.357.520.863.921.265.219.465.819.567.217.769.117.967.317.872.617.375.717.477.916.777.717.274.418.275.117.970.717.667.917.763.917.855.917.956.418.158.818.260.93084.61.359.1median 17.9median 65.81.47.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPad Pro 11 2018Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.2 / 4.1 / 7.5 Watt
Load midlight 13.6 / 15.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
7736 mAh
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
8134 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
7300 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
7500 mAh
Power Consumption
-120%
3%
-33%
22%
-27%
Idle Minimum *
1.2
3.2
-167%
1.44
-20%
1.42
-18%
1.76
-47%
3.3
-175%
Idle Average *
4.1
8.7
-112%
6.12
-49%
9.35
-128%
4.22
-3%
4.2
-2%
Idle Maximum *
7.5
10.4
-39%
6.14
18%
9.38
-25%
4.25
43%
7
7%
Load Average *
13.6
29.2
-115%
8.55
37%
12.75
6%
4.52
67%
10.4
24%
Load Maximum *
15.2
40.8
-168%
10.62
30%
14.96
2%
7.35
52%
13.8
9%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
34h 16min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 20min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 22min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 28min
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
7736 mAh
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
8134 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
7300 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
7500 mAh
Battery Runtime
-43%
-17%
-10%
-23%
-24%
Reader / Idle
2056
1083
-47%
2036
-1%
1888
-8%
1227
-40%
1254
-39%
H.264
982
629
-36%
899
-8%
735
-25%
629
-36%
WiFi v1.3
920
509
-45%
693
-25%
796
-13%
495
-46%
670
-27%
Load
208
131
-37%
199
-4%
184
-12%
245
18%
220
6%

Pros

+ 续航时间长
+ 屏幕色准高
+ 相机对一台平板电脑来说很不错
+ 在高负荷状态下,表面温度仍然比较低
+ 外放效果好
+ 配件丰富
+ 性能强劲
+ 外观时尚
+ Wi-Fi速度快

Cons

- 外壳不坚固
- 较老的配件不能兼容
- 价格昂贵
- 持续高负荷下有降频现象
- USB TypeC数量有限
- 面容ID不如iPhone好
苹果iPad Pro 11(2018款,Wi-Fi版,64 GB)平板电脑评测
苹果iPad Pro 11(2018款,Wi-Fi版,64 GB)平板电脑评测

第三代iPad Pro为这个系列带来了新的开始。苹果对其进行了重新设计,在颜色选择上更为柔和。新iPad Pro 11更加接近于苹果“神奇玻璃表面”的设计理念,因为它具有更好的屏幕和屏占比。

电池寿命和性能也得到了很大的改善,但是这一切都是更高的售价换来的。最贵的iPad Pro 11售价达到了12499元(1TB存储),对于一台平板电脑来说这实在太贵了。12.9英寸的型号价格则更加昂贵。

iPad Pro 11也有缺点,它的外壳没有我们想象的那么坚固,这对于这种价格不菲的设备来说极为致命。新iPad Pro 11是一台迷人的平板电脑,很适合那些有能力购买的人,因为在性能上很少有设备能与其匹敌。

 

 

Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 - 09/16/2019 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
84 / 98 → 86%
Keyboard
71 / 80 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
55 / 70 → 78%
Weight
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Battery
90%
Display
91%
Games Performance
65 / 78 → 83%
Application Performance
84 / 92 → 91%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
83 / 91 → 91%
Camera
54 / 85 → 63%
Average
81%
90%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 苹果iPad Pro 11(2018款,Wi-Fi版,64 GB)平板电脑评测
Florian Schmitt, 2018-11-27 (Update: 2024-11- 4)