Notebookcheck Logo

苹果iPad Pro 11 2020款平板电脑评测：这才是升级应该有的样子

能替代笔记本了？

当前的iPad Pro 11 2020试图通过支持触摸板和更强的性能来巩固其作为笔记本电脑替代产品的地位。 此外还对摄像头进行了改进，显示屏现在支持120 Hz。 在这篇评论中，我们将仔细研究苹果的独家产品。
Apple ARM iPad Pro Tablet
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (iPad Pro Series)
Processor
Apple A12Z Bionic 8 x - 2.5 GHz, Vortex, Tempest
Graphics adapter
Apple A12Z Bionic GPU
Memory
6 GB 
Display
11.00 inch 2.86:2, 2388 x 1668 pixel 265 PPI, 电容触摸屏, Liquid Retina Display, IPS, ProMotion自适应刷新率技术；广色域显示 (P3)；原彩显示；防油渍防指纹涂层；全层压显示屏；抗反射涂层；亮面屏；120Hz, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB NVMe, 128 GB 
, 115 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB Type-C音频输出, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 亮度传感器，加速传感器，陀螺仪，晴雨表，指南针, 智能连接器
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.9 x 247.6 x 178.5
Battery
28.65 Wh, 7538 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Apple iPadOS 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix 4-LED 原彩闪光灯，自动对焦，OIS
Secondary Camera: 7 MPix 视网膜屏闪光灯，动话表情和拟我表情
Additional features
Speakers: 四扬声器系统, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘，键盘式智能双面夹需另外购买, 充电器；USB Type-A转Type-C转接线, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Released
03/18/2020
Weight
471 g, Power Supply: 72 g
Price
879 Euro
Links
Apple homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
90.4 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2020
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
A12Z Bionic, A12Z Bionic GPU		471 g5.9 mm11.00"2388x1668
89.8 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2018
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
A12X Bionic, A12X Bionic GPU		468 g5.9 mm11.00"2388x1668
88.1 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2020
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)		790 g8.5 mm12.30"2736x1824
87.8 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2019
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
SD 855, Adreno 640		420 g5.7 mm10.50"2560x1600
83.4 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2018
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Kirin 960s, Mali-G71 MP8		498 g7.3 mm10.80"2560x1600
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020

Size Comparison

❌
292 mm 201 mm 8.5 mm 790 g258.7 mm 171.8 mm 7.3 mm 498 g248 mm 179 mm 5.9 mm 468 g247.6 mm 178.5 mm 5.9 mm 471 g244.5 mm 159.5 mm 5.7 mm 420 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
A12Z Bionic GPU, A12Z Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
828 (752min - 864max) MBit/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
634 (561min - 705max) MBit/s -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
577 (534min - 612max) MBit/s -30%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
A12X Bionic GPU, A12X Bionic, TSB3247M61710TWNA1 64GB NVMe
488 (262min - 543max) MBit/s -41%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
237 MBit/s -71%
iperf3 receive AX12
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
836 (743min - 888max) MBit/s +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
679 (600min - 714max) MBit/s +11%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
A12Z Bionic GPU, A12Z Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
609 (572min - 622max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
A12X Bionic GPU, A12X Bionic, TSB3247M61710TWNA1 64GB NVMe
537 (397min - 559max) MBit/s -12%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s -65%
04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765810855Tooltip
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø608 (572-622)
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø828 (752-864)
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Turn
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Turn
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Wi-Fi – Overview
GPS Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Wi-Fi – Overview
GPS Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Wi-Fi – Turn
GPS Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Wi-Fi – Turn
GPS Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Wi-Fi – Bridge
GPS Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Wi-Fi – Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Picture main optics
Picture main optics
Picture wide-angle optics
Picture wide-angle optics
ColorChecker
4 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
8 ∆E
2 ∆E
4 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
4 ∆E
3 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPad Pro 11 2020: 5.46 ∆E min: 2.04 - max: 11.73 ∆E
ColorChecker
25.6 ∆E
41 ∆E
33 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
48.7 ∆E
38 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
30.1 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
47.9 ∆E
49 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
47 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
45.3 ∆E
46 ∆E
41.1 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPad Pro 11 2020: 34.52 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 48.98 ∆E
609
cd/m²		629
cd/m²		567
cd/m²
637
cd/m²		617
cd/m²		569
cd/m²
547
cd/m²		538
cd/m²		553
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Liquid Retina Display tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 637 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 585.1 cd/m² Minimum: 4.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 617 cd/m²
Contrast: 1714:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.94 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.156
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
IPS, 2388x1668, 11"		Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
IPS, 2388x1668, 11"		Microsoft Surface Pro 7
IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3"		Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5"		Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8"
Screen
-8%
-11%
-79%
-76%
Brightness middle
617
639
4%
435
-29%
446
-28%
382
-38%
Brightness
585
591
1%
422
-28%
445
-24%
378
-35%
Brightness Distribution
84
87
4%
90
7%
86
2%
92
10%
Black Level *
0.36
0.45
-25%
0.32
11%
0.24
33%
Contrast
1714
1420
-17%
1359
-21%
1592
-7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.94
0.92
2%
1.18
-26%
2.7
-187%
2.8
-198%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.87
2.59
-39%
2.27
-21%
5.4
-189%
6
-221%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.4
1.3
7%
1.12
20%
2.1
-50%
3.5
-150%
Gamma
2.156 102%
2.22 99%
2.3 96%
2.05 107%
2.33 94%
CCT
6733 97%
6656 98%
6502 100%
6468 100%
6903 94%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.49
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1316 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 1316 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 1316 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms rise
↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
Geekbench 5.5 | 3DMark | AnTuTu v8 | Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
1127 Points
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (1117 - 1127, n=2)
1122 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
1120 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1890, n=71, last 2 years)
704 Points -38%
Multi-Core
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (4707 - 4712, n=2)
4710 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
4707 Points
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
4620 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)
2450 Points -48%
Metal Score 5.1
Average of class Tablet (last 2 years)
29543 Points +196%
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (9984 - 10011, n=2)
9998 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
9984 Points
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
9361 Points -6%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
110846 Points
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (110582 - 110846, n=2)
110714 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
73307 Points -34%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
26875 Points -76%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
221941 Points
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (220422 - 221941, n=2)
221182 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
107333 Points -52%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
35210 Points -84%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (40279 - 40299, n=2)
40289 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
40279 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
34750 Points -14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
14698 Points -64%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (712218 - 751846, n=2)
732032 Points +3%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
712218 Points
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
678238 Points -5%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (5657 - 5709, n=2)
5683 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
5657 Points
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
5216 Points -8%
Average of class Tablet (309 - 9739, n=13, last 2 years)
2174 Points -62%

Legend

 
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Apple A12Z Bionic, Apple A12Z Bionic GPU, 128 GB NVMe
 
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 Apple A12X Bionic, Apple A12X Bionic GPU, TSB3247M61710TWNA1 64GB NVMe
 
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Qualcomm Adreno 640, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 HiSilicon Kirin 960s, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Average Apple A12Z Bionic
 
Average of class Tablet
Jetstream 2 | JetStream 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | Speedometer 2.0 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1)
127.4 Points
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
124.5 Points -2%
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (124.5 - 127.4, n=3)
126 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)
107.9 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
67 Points -47%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13)
277.7 Points +1%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
274.4 Points
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (272 - 274, n=2)
273 Points -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Microsoft Edge 44.18362.449.0)
255.5 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
118.1 Points -57%
Average of class Tablet (last 2 years)
90.4 Points -67%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
36.13 Points -87%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1)
194 Points
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
141 Points -27%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13)
172 Points -11%
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (140 - 194, n=3)
158.3 Points -18%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=47, last 2 years)
152.6 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
104 Points -46%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1)
154 runs/min
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (135 - 154, n=2)
144.5 runs/min -6%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (IOS 12.1.1)
131.9 (131min - 133max) runs/min -14%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years)
114.9 runs/min -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
66.2 runs/min -57%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13)
44425 Points +5%
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (42372 - 43057, n=3)
42618 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1)
42425 Points
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
42372 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Microsoft Edge 44.18362.449.0)
35408 Points -17%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)
28263 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
24654 Points -42%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
6802 Points -84%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
5947 ms * -821%
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)
3807 ms * -489%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
2176 ms * -237%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Microsoft Edge 44.18362.449.0)
984 ms * -52%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
646 ms *
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (646 - 646, n=2)
646 ms * -0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13)
603 ms * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 34.2 °C36.3 °C34.6 °C 
 34.3 °C37.9 °C36 °C 
 34.5 °C37.4 °C35.4 °C 
Maximum: 37.9 °C
Average: 35.6 °C
36.7 °C37.9 °C35.6 °C
37.7 °C40.1 °C36.9 °C
36.4 °C37.6 °C35.4 °C
Maximum: 40.1 °C
Average: 37.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR 260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Heat development front
Heat development front
Heat development back
Heat development back
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.340.42540.741.13131.138.64034.3435034.751.96328.946.48023.840.910026.249.41252253.716020.757.32002157.225018.657.131517.762.540017.268.35001970.56301771.580015.272100017.369.7125015.468.6160018.564.6200015.958.7250015.165.6315014.464.3400014.860.1500015.161.2630015.363.8800015.664.91000015.961.41250016.161.21600016.657SPL60.869.667.428.378.5N15.224.219.31.145.8median 16.6median 62.5median 43.3median 14.7median 62.1Delta3.13.92413.616.433.633.537.537.435.837.837.935.639.134.730.232.530.231.828.4412451.923.756.222.662.221.666.519.866.519.468.519.96918.368.819.466.518.5671866.218.468.118.167.118.367.417.964.417.965.317.66217.965.817.770.117.864.317.958.917.957.160.830.578.715.91.448.7median 18.3median 65.8median 63.736.515hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPad Pro 11 2020Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.3 / 3.5 / 5.6 Watt
Load midlight 12.5 / 19.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
7538 mAh		Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
7736 mAh		Microsoft Surface Pro 7
 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
7040 mAh		Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
7500 mAh
Power Consumption
-6%
-186%
23%
-7%
Idle Minimum *
1.3
1.2
8%
4.4
-238%
1.96
-51%
2.01
-55%
Idle Average *
3.5
4.1
-17%
8.7
-149%
2.8
20%
5.4
-54%
Idle Maximum *
5.6
7.5
-34%
9.6
-71%
2.82
50%
5.44
3%
Load Average *
12.5
13.6
-9%
44
-252%
5.31
58%
8.55
32%
Load Maximum *
19.2
15.2
21%
61
-218%
11.91
38%
11.53
40%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
33h 21min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 02min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 36min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 17min
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
7538 mAh		Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
7736 mAh		Microsoft Surface Pro 7
 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
7040 mAh		Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
7500 mAh
Battery Runtime
4%
-50%
-2%
-22%
Reader / Idle
2001
2056
3%
690
-66%
1276
-36%
1344
-33%
H.264
936
982
5%
403
-57%
872
-7%
702
-25%
WiFi v1.3
902
920
2%
586
-35%
556
-38%
648
-28%
Load
197
208
6%
115
-42%
340
73%
196
-1%

Pros

+ 色彩精确的120 Hz显示屏
+ 各种各样的配件
+ 快速Wi-Fi
+ 快速的性能
+ 不错的双摄
+ 高品质的扬声器
+ 续航时间长
+ 比的前代产品便宜...

Cons

- ...但是还是太贵了
- 屏幕响应时间慢
- 仅12个月保修
- 机身容易弯

Verdict – Sensible Updates and a Lower Price

In review: Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
In review: Apple iPad Pro 11 2020

苹果对其2020 iPad Pro 11机型进行了一些改进，甚至降低了大多数配置的价格。尽管这听起来似乎很划算，但Apple iPad Pro仍然不便宜。但是，它的许多方面也对得起高昂的价格：尽管在平板电脑领域已经成为标杆，但相机得到了进一步的改进。尽管它们无法与最新的高端智能手机相机匹敌，但它们具有拍摄精美照片的能力。

魔术键盘扩展了各种各样的配件，USB Type-C端口也使Apple平板电脑可以使用第三方硬件。例如，由于有了新的光标，现在可以使用普通的USB鼠标在系统中导航。

该设备功能强大，配备有快速的Wi-Fi和存储设备，并且具有非常精确的色彩，并且由于其120 Hz的刷新率，因此能够显示极其流畅的动画。

合理的更新，且价格基本上处于较为适中的状态：如果您负担得起的话，Apple iPad Pro 11在2020年再次成为不错的选择。

由于Apple总体上进行了非常合理的更新，因此即使是上一代的升级也值得。机身容易弯的事实是唯一真正的缺点。

注意：由于我们的许多基准测试尚未与iPad OS 13.4兼容，并且Magic Keyboard作为重要附件将于5月发布，因此一旦获得新信息，我们将更新我们的评论。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 - 04/11/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
84 / 98 → 86%
Keyboard
77 / 80 → 96%
Pointing Device
99%
Connectivity
51 / 70 → 72%
Weight
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Battery
90%
Display
91%
Games Performance
61 / 78 → 78%
Application Performance
82 / 92 → 89%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
82 / 91 → 90%
Camera
67 / 85 → 79%
Average
81%
90%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 苹果iPad Pro 11 2020款平板电脑评测：这才是升级应该有的样子
Florian Schmitt, 2020-06-12 (Update: 2020-06-12)