Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar外星人m17 (i9-8950HK, RTX 2080 Max-Q, 4K UHD) 笔记本电脑评测
Alienware m17 P37E (m17 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-8950HK 6 x 2.9 - 4.8 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1230 MHz, RAM: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, 419.67, Optimus
Memory
16 GB
, DDR4-2666, 1333.3 MHz, PC4-21300, 19-19-19-43, 双通道
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, Dell P/N: 8CJK2, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Storage
SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG), 512 GB
Weight
2.63 kg, Power Supply: 924 g
Price
39999 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 357.9 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 346.5 cd/m² Minimum: 44.64 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 357.9 cd/m²
Contrast: 1085:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.57 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 6.74
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
88.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.6
| Alienware m17 P37E AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160 | Alienware 17 R5 JYWWF_B173QTN (AUO1496), TN, 17.3", 2560x1440 | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), AHVA, 17.3", 1920x1080 | MSI GS75 8SG Stealth N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade Pro 2017 Sharp LQ173D1JW33 (SHP145A), IGZO, 17.3", 3840x2160 | Acer Predator Triton 700 AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -26% | -25% | -22% | 1% | -25% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 86.4 | 63.4 -27% | 62.9 -27% | 63.6 -26% | 88.9 3% | 62.5 -28% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 86.1 -14% | 87.1 -13% | 95.4 -5% | 100 0% | 88.7 -11% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 99.1 | 62.9 -37% | 63.7 -36% | 65.5 -34% | 99.7 1% | 63.5 -36% |
| Response Times | 61% | 56% | 73% | -54% | -16% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 35.6 ? | 20.8 ? 42% | 17.6 ? 51% | 7.6 ? 79% | 60.8 ? -71% | 44.8 ? -26% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 6 ? 79% | 11.2 ? 60% | 9.6 ? 66% | 38.4 ? -37% | 29.6 ? -6% |
| PWM Frequency | 25510 ? | 204.9 ? | ||||
| Screen | -7% | 14% | 25% | -4% | -9% | |
| Brightness middle | 357.9 | 398 11% | 295 -18% | 355 -1% | 230 -36% | 291 -19% |
| Brightness | 347 | 367 6% | 291 -16% | 327 -6% | 207 -40% | 277 -20% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 86 -9% | 96 2% | 85 -10% | 83 -12% | 84 -11% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.51 -55% | 0.24 27% | 0.26 21% | 0.2 39% | 0.22 33% |
| Contrast | 1085 | 780 -28% | 1229 13% | 1365 26% | 1150 6% | 1323 22% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.57 | 5.45 17% | 3.2 51% | 1.54 77% | 5.62 14% | 5.52 16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.86 | 10.36 -5% | 6.64 33% | 3 70% | 10.24 -4% | 10.72 -9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 6.74 | 2.56 62% | 2.52 63% | 0.77 89% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 5.4 -26% | 2.16 50% | 2.19 49% | 4.54 -6% | 6.59 -53% |
| Gamma | 2.6 85% | 2.4 92% | 2.46 89% | 2.42 91% | 2.36 93% | 2.44 90% |
| CCT | 6403 102% | 7453 87% | 6872 95% | 6893 94% | 6625 98% | 7816 83% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 88.4 | 56 -37% | 57 -36% | 61 -31% | 88 0% | 58 -34% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 86 -14% | 87 -13% | 95 -5% | 100 0% | 89 -11% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
-2% | 15% /
12% | 25% /
22% | -19% /
-10% | -17% /
-13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 35.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8747 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Alienware m17 P37E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1206 (1178.9-1238.2)
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW020T8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1157 (1138.53-1236.86)
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1095 (1008.45-1230.43)
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1164 (1146.3-1213.67)
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3812 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4765 points | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5632 points | |
Help | ||
| Alienware m17 P37E SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | Alienware 17 R5 SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | MSI GS75 8SG Stealth 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0) | Razer Blade Pro 2017 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0) | Acer Predator Triton 700 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -28% | -14% | 60% | 14% | 36% | |
| Seq Read | 1835 | 2203 20% | 1315 -28% | 3005 64% | 2599 42% | 2517 37% |
| Seq Write | 1121 | 559 -50% | 927 -17% | 2668 138% | 588 -48% | 2372 112% |
| 4K Read | 23.98 | 38.74 62% | 52.4 119% | 40.89 71% | 37.57 57% | 41.47 73% |
| 4K Write | 100 | 92.7 -7% | 122.8 23% | 94.4 -6% | 104.4 4% | 93 -7% |
| 4K-64 Read | 687 | 447.2 -35% | 326.5 -52% | 1366 99% | 1116 62% | 1057 54% |
| 4K-64 Write | 776 | 279.1 -64% | 727 -6% | 1197 54% | 513 -34% | 913 18% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.047 | 0.091 -94% | 0.11 -134% | 0.055 -17% | 0.051 -9% | 0.062 -32% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.053 | 0.065 -23% | 0.045 15% | 0.039 26% | 0.036 32% | 0.041 23% |
| Score Read | 895 | 706 -21% | 510 -43% | 1708 91% | 1414 58% | 1350 51% |
| Score Write | 988 | 428 -57% | 942 -5% | 1558 58% | 676 -32% | 1243 26% |
| Score Total | 2306 | 1424 -38% | 1715 -26% | 4123 79% | 2715 18% | 3282 42% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 773 | |||||
| Copy Program MB/s | 493 | |||||
| Copy Game MB/s | 647 |
* ... smaller is better
SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
2671 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
1157 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
515 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
436.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1389 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1278 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
44.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
120.2 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 21837 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 25513 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 17684 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 7253 points | |
Help | ||
Alienware m17 P37E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG): Ø73.4 (67-80)
| low | med. | high | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 312.6 | 271 | 252.1 | 164.7 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 277.6 | 221.1 | 138.2 | 75.7 | 53 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 196.4 | 165.7 | 131.9 | 113.1 | 52.4 |
| Alienware m17 P37E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | Alienware 17 R5 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | MSI GS75 8SG Stealth GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0) | Razer Blade Pro 2017 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0) | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -4% | -6% | -6% | -5% | -5% | |
| off / environment * | 28.2 | 30 -6% | 29 -3% | 30 -6% | 30 -6% | 31 -10% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.2 | 32 -13% | 29 -3% | 31 -10% | 30 -6% | 33 -17% |
| Idle Average * | 28.2 | 33 -17% | 32 -13% | 32 -13% | 31 -10% | 34 -21% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31 | 34 -10% | 40 -29% | 41 -32% | 33 -6% | 40 -29% |
| Load Average * | 50.8 | 43 15% | 46 9% | 47 7% | 43 15% | 41 19% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 50.8 | 51 -0% | 51 -0% | 47 7% | 55 -8% | 43 15% |
| Load Maximum * | 50.8 | 51 -0% | 52 -2% | 48 6% | 58 -14% | 48 6% |
* ... smaller is better
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 28.2 / 28.2 / 31 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 50.8 / 50.8 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) | ||
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.2 °C / 90 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.3 °C / -6 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.2 °C / 90 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.3 °C / -6 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Alienware m17 P37E audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.32 / 0.84 Watt |
| Idle | 21.2 / 29.6 / 34 Watt |
| Load |
130.9 / 219.7 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Alienware m17 P37E i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Alienware 17 R5 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, TN, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GS75 8SG Stealth i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade Pro 2017 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0), IGZO, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Acer Predator Triton 700 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -8% | 10% | 27% | -19% | -5% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 21.2 | 28 -32% | 19 10% | 13 39% | 31 -46% | 28 -32% |
| Idle Average * | 29.6 | 32 -8% | 22 26% | 17 43% | 36 -22% | 33 -11% |
| Idle Maximum * | 34 | 37 -9% | 29 15% | 23 32% | 44 -29% | 41 -21% |
| Load Average * | 130.9 | 112 14% | 102 22% | 90 31% | 107 18% | 94 28% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 177.5 | 192 -8% | 190 -7% | 147 17% | 212 -19% | 160 10% |
| Load Maximum * | 219.7 | 231 -5% | 231 -5% | 215 2% | 258 -17% | 222 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
| Alienware m17 P37E i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 90 Wh | Alienware 17 R5 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 99 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh | MSI GS75 8SG Stealth i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh | Razer Blade Pro 2017 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 99 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 700 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 54 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -15% | -5% | 1% | -7% | -27% | |
| Reader / Idle | 543 | 268 -51% | 372 -31% | 464 -15% | 253 -53% | 150 -72% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 296 | 218 -26% | 235 -21% | 316 7% | 197 -33% | 144 -51% |
| Load | 49 | 64 31% | 67 37% | 54 10% | 81 65% | 70 43% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 52 |
Pros
+ 比Alienware 17更小，更轻，更薄
+ 可升级的硬盘和RAM
+ 电池寿命长；Optimus驱动
+ 机身刚性不错; 坚固的显示器盖
+ 雷电3
Cons
- 没有单键RGB，SD卡读卡器，或是低音炮
- 2.5英寸SATA托架会牺牲电池大小
- 游戏时温度极高
- 没有可编程宏按键
- 键盘手感偏软
- 容易沾染指纹
- 没有G-Sync
戴尔巧妙地将其Alienware 17系列分为两个截然不同的版本：Alienware m17和Alienware Area-51m。虽然较薄的m17与原来的17系列相比已没有什么相同点，但较大且满血的Area-51m接过了交接棒。曾经笨重的17英寸Alienware系列现在可以吸引喜欢更薄的笔记本电脑的游戏玩家，以及希望从轻薄外形中获得尽可能多的性能的游戏玩家。
因为m17本质上是一个“Alienware 17轻薄版”，但是原版系列的粉丝们会为这样一个事实感到遗憾：它以更薄更轻的名义牺牲了一些经典的Alienware功能。它仍然没有MSI，华硕或宏基的最新型号那样轻薄，因此m17更像是超薄和厚重之间的中间解决方案。另一方面，额外的周长使得m17底盘比其许多超薄替代品更加坚固，尤其是特别A面。
我们最大的抱怨与核心温度，风扇噪音和键盘有关。即使风扇在最大声的情况下运行也能达到98摄氏度的核心温度，对于许多人来说游戏会很难运行。同时，软键反馈更适合于薄型超极本，而不是像m17这样的发烧级游戏笔记本电脑。 MSI和Clevo笔记本电脑上的SteelSeries键盘提供更坚实的关键反馈，以获得更紧凑的游戏体验。 Area-51m和旧版Alienware 17上的斜面键盘布局也让游戏感觉更好。
与Alienware 17相比，Alienware m17显着减轻了重量和尺寸。然而，缺点是显而易见的，包括省略了许多硬件功能以及换成Max-Q GPU。幸运的是，想要更经典的Alienware体验的用户可以选择Area-51m，而其他用户会更喜欢m17
Alienware m17 P37E
- 04/14/2019 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Gaming - Weighted Average
Price comparison
