Notebookcheck Logo

realme 9 Pro Plus智能手机评测--大量的性能和体面的低光拍照

中端加?

realme 9 Pro+是中档系列中速度最快、配置最好的机型。由于有60瓦的充电,快速存储和快速处理器,它不必隐藏,但也有强大的竞争。我们仔细看看测试中的智能手机。
5G ARM Android Smartphone
realme 9 Pro+
Realme 9 Pro Plus (9 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 920 8 x 2 - 2.5 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
Display
6.40 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 411 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, 360Hz sampling rate, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 113 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio port, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, Heart Rate Monitor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 160.3 x 73.3
Battery
4500 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 60W Realme SuperDart Charge
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, OIS, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.4, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, bumper, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.99 W/​kg (head), 1.22 W/​kg (body)
Weight
182 g
Price
380 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
84.1 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2022
Realme 9 Pro Plus
Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4
182 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.40"2400x1080
82.2 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2021
Realme 8 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618
176 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.40"2400x1080
83.1 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition)
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
170 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
86 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2021
Xiaomi Poco F3
SD 870, Adreno 650
196 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
85.1 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080

外壳和功能 - 不寻常的颜色

realme 9系列应该能提供物美价廉的功能。realme 9 Pro Plus的售价约为400欧元(约443美元),有两种配置。

  • realme 9 Pro+配备6GB内存和128GB大容量存储。380欧元(约合人民币420元)
  • realme 9 Pro+配备8GB内存和256GB大容量存储。430欧元(约合476美元)

该制造商为其智能手机提供三种颜色。极光绿,一种深绿色;午夜黑,一种天鹅绒般的蓝色闪耀的黑色;日出蓝,一种明亮的蓝色,是最不寻常的颜色,其涂层在阳光下会褪色。你也只能得到日出蓝的小内存变体。

外壳本身是由塑料制成的,光亮的背面非常容易沾染指纹。稳定性是令人信服的,即使是较强的手指压力也不会传到屏幕上。做工也很干净,没有明显的棱角。

还提供了一个3.5毫米的插孔,用于声音输出,有Hi-Res认证,还有NFC,你可以通过指纹传感器测量你的心率,作为一个小的补充。

realme 9 Pro+
realme 9 Pro+
realme 9 Pro+
realme 9 Pro+

尺寸比较

163.7 mm 76.4 mm 7.8 mm 196 g161 mm 74 mm 8 mm 176 g160.3 mm 73.3 mm 8 mm 182 g159.9 mm 75.1 mm 8.4 mm 189 g159.2 mm 73.5 mm 7.9 mm 170 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

通信、软件和操作 - 现代操作系统与臃肿的软件

在我们用参考路由器华硕GT-AXE11000进行的WLAN测试中,realme 9 Pro Plus被证明是很敏捷的,但速度不太稳定;数据速率时不时会有下降的情况。当然,这是一款5G智能手机,许多4G频率也被支持,所以你很可能在旅行中使用移动互联网。

realme UI 3是基于Android 12,安全补丁是在测试时从2022年2月开始的,因此是相当最新的。一些预装的第三方应用程序,如购物门户网站,必须接受,但它们可以被删除,没有任何问题。很好的是,realme已经照顾到了DRM-L1认证,所以你也可以观看高清的流媒体视频。

90赫兹的屏幕可以流畅地操作。表面覆盖着一层保护膜,但手指在上面也能轻松滑行。集成在屏幕上的指纹传感器对放置的手指迅速作出反应。只要提起智能手机,即使在待机状态下也能看到指示扫描仪位置的图标。传感器在相当短的等待后对激活作出反应,并可靠地解锁设备。然而,它位于屏幕上相当远的位置,这需要一些时间来适应。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Poco F3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
884 (444min - 914max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
461 (433min - 470max) MBit/s
Realme 8 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
323 (279min - 332max) MBit/s
OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
283 (140min - 293max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Poco F3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
654 (311min - 702max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
425 (413min - 432max) MBit/s
OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
330 (322min - 336max) MBit/s
Realme 8 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
304 (218min - 328max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Realme 9 Pro Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
744 (481min - 821max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Realme 9 Pro Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
821 (569min - 890max) MBit/s
04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765810855Tooltip
Realme 9 Pro Plus; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø743 (481-821)
Realme 9 Pro Plus; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø821 (569-890)

照相机 - 否则,一般的照相机在弱光下是很好的。

前置摄像头的录制

具有光学图像稳定功能的索尼IMX776作为该中档手机的主要传感器。它的分辨率为5000万像素。通过像素分选,有效分辨率降低到1200万像素,这在传感器上创造了更大、更多的感光像素。

在我们的测试照片中,图像清晰度处于平均范围,但亮度和色彩还原度都很好。在低光照和高对比度的情况下,这款智能手机能产生温暖的、有时相当细致的照片。

广角摄像头有800万像素,处于通常水平。当你更多地去了解细节时,就会失去很多东西,但照片对于概览拍摄来说是不错的。Realme还安装了自己的微距镜头,仅有200万像素,可以拍出不错的特写。

在正面,还有一个1600万像素的自拍镜。照片可以更亮一点,在黑暗区域显示更多细节。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera PlantMain camera EnvironmentMain camera Low LightWide-angle camera
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
12.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Realme 9 Pro Plus: 8.2 ∆E min: 3.1 - max: 17.87 ∆E
ColorChecker
24.2 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
32.8 ∆E
47.4 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
25.7 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
47.6 ∆E
49.1 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
33 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
45.9 ∆E
27.5 ∆E
38.1 ∆E
40 ∆E
41.1 ∆E
40 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Realme 9 Pro Plus: 32.45 ∆E min: 13.42 - max: 49.09 ∆E

显示 - 良好的色彩再现

子像素记录
子像素记录

AMOLED显示屏现在是完全正常的东西,即使在中端。realme 9 Pro+提供典型的全高清分辨率,但亮度比前代产品更均匀。然而,那些追求高峰值亮度的人将不得不看小米或三星;realme手机的屏幕无法跟上。

作为回报,色彩的显示精度相当好,响应时间也令人信服。

559
cd/m²
556
cd/m²
561
cd/m²
554
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
559
cd/m²
561
cd/m²
560
cd/m²
561
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 561 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 557.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 550 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.215
Realme 9 Pro Plus
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"
Realme 8 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"
OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition)
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"
Xiaomi Poco F3
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"
Response Times
-5%
66%
84%
-3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8 ?(5, 3)
8 ?(5, 3)
-0%
3.6 ?(2, 1.6)
55%
3.6 ?(2, 1.6)
55%
10 ?(6, 4)
-25%
Response Time Black / White *
9 ?(5, 4)
6 ?(3, 3)
33%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
73%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
73%
8 ?(5, 3)
11%
PWM Frequency
218.3
114.7
-47%
373.1 ?(44)
71%
490.2 ?(26)
125%
231.5
6%
Screen
-50%
7%
46%
6%
Brightness middle
550
581
6%
590
7%
889
62%
736
34%
Brightness
558
563
1%
596
7%
902
62%
751
35%
Brightness Distribution
98
86
-12%
97
-1%
95
-3%
96
-2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.8
4.34
-141%
1.9
-6%
0.9
50%
2.18
-21%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.51
7.15
-59%
3.8
16%
1.9
58%
5.69
-26%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.5
4.9
-96%
2.1
16%
1.3
48%
2.1
16%
Gamma
2.215 99%
2.327 95%
2.13 103%
2.26 97%
2.27 97%
CCT
6337 103%
7658 85%
6698 97%
6614 98%
6563 99%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-28% / -35%
37% / 26%
65% / 59%
2% / 3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 218.3 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 218.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 218.3 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN色彩空间
CalMAN色彩空间
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命--Realme手机的动力十足

联发科Dimensity 920是一个来自2020年的SoC,但在我们的基准测试中以相当高的性能说服了我们。只有 小米Poco F3配有 骁龙870能在我们价格相近的对比设备中提供更多动力。图形性能显示了与Realme 8 Pro相比的一个重大飞跃。 realme 8 Pro.同样,小米的对比设备也明显更快。

在内存方面,由于UFS 2.2,realme 9 Pro+证明是快速的,但它在价格范围内还没有达到这个水平。同样,它是 小米Poco F3,它提供的东西甚至更多。

realme 9 Pro Plus的外壳上的温度在较长时间的负载中可以上升到44.5℃(112.1°F)。这本身没有问题,但在炎热的夏天,温度上升可能会更高,从而变得令人不快。

立体声扬声器的最大音量相当高,但声音很平衡,你可以听一段音乐。还可以通过蓝牙和3.5毫米插孔连接外部音频设备。

realme手机在电池寿命方面不能完全跟上前辈的步伐,但在我们的无线网络测试中,它在同级别的比较中仍然做得相当好,只有不到16小时。这款手机可以用高达60瓦的功率充电,而且还包括一个相应的充电器。制造商承诺在15分钟内充电50%。即使我们需要多花几分钟时间,我们对充电速度也非常满意。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
814 Points
Realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
570 Points -30%
OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
637 Points -22%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
998 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
771 Points -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920
  (737 - 814, n=2)
776 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)
995 Points +22%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2046 Points
Realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1694 Points -17%
OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
1792 Points -12%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3368 Points +65%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2808 Points +37%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920
  (2046 - 2149, n=2)
2098 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)
3312 Points +62%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
10740 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
8473 Points -21%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
13610 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
12625 Points +18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920
  (7124 - 10740, n=2)
8932 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)
12976 Points +21%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
5434 Points
Realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3782 Points -30%
OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
4062 Points -25%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7970 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
6559 Points +21%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920
  (5434 - 5469, n=2)
5452 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)
11109 Points +104%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
6313 Points
Realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
4008 Points -37%
OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
4254 Points -33%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12033 Points +91%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
7496 Points +19%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920
  (6250 - 6313, n=2)
6282 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)
19708 Points +212%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3653 Points
Realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3160 Points -13%
OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
3508 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3653 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4563 Points +25%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920
  (3653 - 3805, n=2)
3729 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)
5001 Points +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4097 Points
Realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2590 Points -37%
OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
2747 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4967 Points +21%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920
  (4097 - 4190, n=2)
4144 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)
3084 Points -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4340 Points
Realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2462 Points -43%
OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
2613 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5140 Points +18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920
  (4340 - 4342, n=2)
4341 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)
3263 Points -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3425 Points
Realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3168 Points -8%
OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
3349 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4444 Points +30%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920
  (3425 - 3733, n=2)
3579 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)
3286 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4227 Points
Realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2743 Points -35%
OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
2923 Points -31%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7377 Points +75%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5355 Points +27%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920
  (4227 - 4249, n=2)
4238 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)
7767 Points +84%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4400 Points
Realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2642 Points -40%
OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
2800 Points -36%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
9498 Points +116%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5591 Points +27%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920
  (4383 - 4400, n=2)
4392 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)
11536 Points +162%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3717 Points
Realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3164 Points -15%
OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
3452 Points -7%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4140 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4664 Points +25%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920
  (3717 - 3837, n=2)
3777 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)
4613 Points +24%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2294 Points
Realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1052 Points -54%
OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
1114 Points -51%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4288 Points +87%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2490 Points +9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920
  (2294 - 2319, n=2)
2307 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=111, last 2 years)
2840 Points +24%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2264 Points
Realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1052 Points -54%
OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
1109 Points -51%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4271 Points +89%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2485 Points +10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920
  (2264 - 2275, n=2)
2270 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 20321, n=181, last 2 years)
7533 Points +233%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
637 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
335 Points -47%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1223 Points +92%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
690 Points +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920
  (637 - 644, n=2)
641 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=187, last 2 years)
2053 Points +222%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
329 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1222 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
687 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920
  ()
627 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=185, last 2 years)
2051 Points
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
27 fps
Realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps -37%
OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
18 fps -33%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
49 fps +81%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
30 fps +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920
  (26 - 27, n=2)
26.5 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)
49.5 fps +83%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
30 fps
Realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
19 fps -37%
OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
20 fps -33%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
57 fps +90%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
34 fps +13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920
  (30 - 30, n=2)
30 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)
79.8 fps +166%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
17 fps
Realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
11 fps -35%
OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
11 fps -35%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
33 fps +94%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
19 fps +12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920
  (17 - 17, n=2)
17 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)
37.4 fps +120%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11 fps
Realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
7 fps -36%
OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
7.4 fps -33%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
22 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
13 fps +18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920
  (11 - 11, n=2)
11 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)
32 fps +191%
Realme 9 Pro PlusRealme 8 ProOnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition)Xiaomi Poco F3Samsung Galaxy A52s 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-52%
-2%
24%
0%
-1%
104%
Sequential Read 256KB
991
474
-52%
951
-4%
1378
39%
951
-4%
Sequential Write 256KB
474.9
191.7
-60%
466
-2%
684
44%
486.5
2%
Random Read 4KB
173.5
98.5
-43%
187.6
8%
208
20%
168.2
-3%
191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71)
10%
Random Write 4KB
182.1
84.8
-53%
168.1
-8%
170.6
-6%
192.5
6%

温度

Max. Load
 44.5 °C40.8 °C37.9 °C 
 43.8 °C41 °C37.4 °C 
 44.1 °C40.3 °C38.1 °C 
Maximum: 44.5 °C
Average: 40.9 °C
36.5 °C38.4 °C41.5 °C
35.9 °C38.6 °C42.7 °C
35.3 °C38 °C42.5 °C
Maximum: 42.7 °C
Average: 38.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.3 °C | Room Temperature 20.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


热力图前线
热力图前线
热图背面
热图背面

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2049.344.72543.942.43137.137.24037.941.95043.8446331.835.680282910027.928.612523.53016023.843.520019.655.52501961.331517.566.240015.265.750016.868.96302169.980022.375.7100018.779.1125017.379.9160015.881.6200015.883.8250017.484.1315018.481.8400020.279.2500020.371630020.173.3800021.468.81000021.866.41250021.3621600021.858SPL31.691.6N1.683.5median 20.1median 69.9Delta2.311.142.347.736.545.231.740.832.434.5393831.731.122.121.721.220.615.822.917.533.914.540.613.348.512.453.812.559.214.3631765.622.16920.270.314.970.414.675.414.576.41576.216.87418.369.31969.719.671.920.173.420.869.620.260.121.158.330.384.71.258.4median 17median 692.79.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRealme 9 Pro PlusRealme 8 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Realme 9 Pro Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Realme 8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Realme 9 Pro Plus
4500 mAh
Realme 8 Pro
4500 mAh
OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition)
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F3
4520 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
4500 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
956
1006
5%
924
-3%
805
-16%
721
-25%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
15h 56min

Pros

+ 性能高
+ 支持多种4G频率
+ 快速的内存
+ 良好的屏幕色彩显示

Cons

- 预装了臃肿的软件
- 屏幕可以更亮一些
- 波动的WLAN数据率

结论 - 坚实的手机,没有主要的弱点

评测中:realme 9 Pro Plus。测试设备由德国realme公司提供。
评测中:realme 9 Pro Plus。测试设备由德国realme公司提供。

realme 9 Pro Plus是一款非常坚实的中档手机,提供了你在这个价格范围内所期望的一切。一个快速的屏幕,快速充电,体面的运行时间,快速的存储,大量的系统功率和灵活的相机系统。

机箱有一个体面的构造,但并没有从人群中脱颖而出。除了预装的臃肿软件,安排清晰的系统软件令人信服。许多摄影模式,如倾斜移轴或星光模式都很好,但相机质量总体上只是一般。在测试中,Wi-Fi数据速率也有一些波动。

realme 9 Pro+是一款扎实的中端手机,有很多性能和快速充电。

如果所有这些还不够,你将不得不购买 小米Poco F3,它目前仍然提供最佳的性价比。三星的Galaxy A52s 5G也有很好的性能率,但令人失望的是,通过附带的电源适配器充电的速度很慢。

价格和可用性

Y你可以直接从realme购买9 Pro+。.在测试的时候,有一个 Realme垫赠送的。在amazon.de,Cyberportnotebooksbilliger.de你可以得到没有额外费用的智能手机,但价格要便宜一些。

Realme 9 Pro Plus - 08/30/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
47 / 70 → 67%
Weight
90%
Battery
91%
Display
90%
Games Performance
41 / 64 → 64%
Application Performance
86 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
84%
Noise
100%
Audio
71 / 90 → 79%
Camera
67%
Average
78%
84%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > realme 9 Pro Plus智能手机评测--大量的性能和体面的低光拍照
Florian Schmitt, 2022-03-20 (Update: 2022-03-20)