realme GT 2评测--没有最新的骁龙处理器的人得到更好的交易
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Realme GT 2 SD 888 5G, Adreno 660 | 199.8 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.62" | 2400x1080 | |
| 87.4 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Realme GT 2 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730 | 189 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" | 3216x1440 | |
| 85.1 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | OnePlus Nord 2 5G Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9 | 189 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.43" | 2400x1080 | |
| 86.6 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Xiaomi 11T Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9 | 203 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 85.3 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2022 | Motorola Moto G200 5G SD 888+ 5G, Adreno 660 | 202 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.80" | 2460x1080 |
案例和特点 - 有趣和可持续的设计
我们非常喜欢realme GT 2 Pro但现在我们收到了更便宜的，但也是装备较差的realme GT 2进行测试。相比之下 GT 2 Pro折扣相当慷慨，高达250欧元（约263美元）。以下是机型变体的概述。
- realme GT 2 128 GB大容量存储/8 GB内存：549欧元（约577美元）
- realme GT 2 256 GB大容量存储/12 GB内存：599欧元（约630美元）
纸绿、纸白和钢黑三种颜色的变体仍然存在，但你必须接受材料选择上的限制。例如，外壳周围的边框只用塑料制成，而不是大猩猩玻璃Victus，只有较旧的大猩猩玻璃5可供选择。
名字中带有 "Paper "的两种颜色选择由生物聚合物制成，感觉像纸一样，比通常的塑料更轻，还能减少二氧化碳的排放量。在任何情况下，我们的绿色测试设备的背面设计很别致，而黑色模型看起来更简单，如果你喜欢内敛，则更适合。
realme GT 2尽管屏幕对角线比它的专业兄弟略小，但并不真正方便。建造质量令人满意，尽管由于塑料框架，智能手机可以多扭动一下，然后听到吱吱嘎嘎的声音。
机上有两个SIM卡插槽，但没有安装eSIM的选项，也没有扩展存储的microSD读卡器。
通信、软件和操作--具有稳定的WLAN的realme手机
realme GT 2在我们的Wi-Fi测试中非常稳定，速度也很好。这款智能手机可以很好地使用Wi-Fi 6网络。5G和众多的4G频率都在船上，所以你也应该为国际旅行做好准备。在随机测试中，realme手机也被证明具有强大的接收能力，无线信号稳定。
智能手机上预装的realme UI 3是基于Android 12。在测试时，安全补丁可以追溯到2022年4月，从而证明了制造商的定期更新政策。realme承诺为其智能手机提供3个Android 版本和4年的安全更新。
由于Android 12，系统的外观可以在许多方面进行广泛的定制，但realme也进一步调整了其系统，并提供了一个新的单手模式。通过System Cloner，你甚至可以在手机上运行两个完全独立的系统。
120赫兹的屏幕有助于在菜单中的流畅导航，高系统性能也是如此。触摸屏是精确的，甚至在角落里也是如此，物理按钮可以清楚地感觉到，而且对左撇子来说也是合理的位置。指纹传感器集成在屏幕上，可以快速、可靠地解锁智能手机。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G | |
| Xiaomi 11T | |
| Motorola Moto G200 5G | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G | |
| Xiaomi 11T | |
| Motorola Moto G200 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Realme GT 2 Pro | |
| Realme GT 2 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Realme GT 2 Pro | |
| Realme GT 2 | |
照相机 - 几乎所有地方都减少了百万像素
realme GT 2使用索尼的IMX 766作为其主摄像头的相机传感器。这允许拍摄高达5000万像素的照片，但默认情况下使用像素分选，这意味着分辨率被降低到1200万像素，较大的像素被用于提高亮度。我们喜欢正常日光下的画质和色彩再现，尽管细节上的锐度并不完美。在弱光和高对比度的情况下，即使在黑暗区域，许多细节仍然被保留下来。
因此，虽然主摄像头的传感器与Realme GT 2 Pro相比没有差异，但它的质量却很好。 realme GT 2 Pro其余的相机不得不用更少的像素来解决。这在超广角相机中可能是最明显的，那里只有800万而不是5000万像素（1200万像素的像素分选）。因此，真正的GT 2对用户来说灵活性较差。
realme GT 2可以录制4K视频，但不能像专业机型那样录制8K电影。用主传感器录制的质量仍然很好，但超广角镜头的质量较低，意味着缺少在镜头之间平滑缩放的选项。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera PlantMain camera EnviromentMain camera Low LightWide-angle camera
显示屏 - 非常明亮，并有直流调光功能
AMOLED屏幕的分辨率为2400×1080像素，对于6.62英寸的屏幕尺寸来说，这已经相当足够了，可以显示没有可见像素的精美画面。然而，专业版机型在此还提供了1440p分辨率的选项，这在realme GT 2中是没有的。
在亮度方面，这款智能手机处于一个良好的水平，最高约为750cd/m²，照明非常均匀。在需要时，色彩再现也相当准确，但不太接近顶级手机。屏幕可以分几步调整亮度，但不像专业机型那样精细。
我们注意到PWM的闪烁。在realme Lab中可以激活的直流调光模式的帮助下，信号明显改变为50赫兹左右的相对均匀的闪烁，这对一些用户来说可能更令人愉快。然而，由于对闪烁的屏幕的反应是非常个性化的，只有尝试一下通常才有帮助。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 759 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.14 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
| Realme GT 2 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6" | Realme GT 2 Pro AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.7" | OnePlus Nord 2 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Xiaomi 11T AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Motorola Moto G200 5G IPS LCD, 2460x1080, 6.8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -25% | -30% | 16% | 5784% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 10 ? | 15 ? -50% | 8 ? 20% | 2.8 ? 72% | 32 ? -220% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 6 ? | 6 ? -0% | 8 ? -33% | 2.8 ? 53% | 28 ? -367% |
| PWM Frequency | 495 | 367.6 -26% | 119.6 -76% | 120.2 ? -76% | 89290 17938% |
| Screen | -23% | -21% | 13% | -29% | |
| Brightness middle | 759 | 740 -3% | 594 -22% | 781 3% | 512 -33% |
| Brightness | 756 | 732 -3% | 594 -21% | 782 3% | 488 -35% |
| Brightness Distribution | 98 | 98 0% | 99 1% | 94 -4% | 87 -11% |
| Black Level * | 0.36 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.14 | 3.25 -52% | 2.74 -28% | 2 7% | 3.42 -60% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.68 | 6.46 -14% | 6 -6% | 2.9 49% | 5.9 -4% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 4.7 -68% | 4.2 -50% | 2.3 18% | 3.7 -32% |
| Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.213 99% | 2.278 97% | 2.28 96% | 7154 0% |
| CCT | 6517 100% | 5663 115% | 7322 89% | 6852 95% | 1.944 334362% |
| Contrast | 1422 | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -24% /
-24% | -26% /
-24% | 15% /
14% | 2878% /
1908% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 495 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 495 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 495 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
具有固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置的测量系列
性能、排放和电池寿命--老式的处理器，功率很大
凭借其 骁龙888realme GT 2依靠的是一个过时的SoC。然而，由于它是去年的顶级处理器，其性能应该仍然处于非常高的水平。我们的测量和基准测试证实了这一点。我们的测试设备不能完全跟上 realme GT 2 Pro，但其他对比设备很容易被超越或与之持平。
在大多数情况下，其性能应该足以满足日常使用，也有足够的资源用于游戏。快速的内存也有助于形成一个非常流畅的系统。
然而，负载温度相当高，在某些情况下超过45℃（113°F）。我们是在室温下测量的，所以在高温环境下触摸真正的GT 2的负载可能会相当不舒服。
立体声扬声器，其中听筒作为第二个扬声器，提供了一个良好的整体声音，没有过度驱动。外部音频设备可以通过USB-C或蓝牙连接。目前所有的aptX编解码器都支持。
realme GT 2的电池实际上由两块电池组成，每块电池可以储存2500毫安时。因此，总共有5,000毫安时可用。与专业机型一样，电池系统可以通过附带的电源适配器以高达65瓦的功率充电，因此不需要一个小时就能再次充满。
运行时间并不像专业机型那样好，但它们仍然绝对适合日常使用，在我们的WLAN测试中几乎达到16小时。在没有电源插座的情况下，你应该可以轻松度过两个工作日。
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Realme GT 2 | |
| Realme GT 2 Pro | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G | |
| Xiaomi 11T | |
| Motorola Moto G200 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (32 - 73, n=26) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 166, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Realme GT 2 | |
| Realme GT 2 Pro | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G | |
| Xiaomi 11T | |
| Motorola Moto G200 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (46 - 87, n=27) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Realme GT 2 | |
| Realme GT 2 Pro | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G | |
| Xiaomi 11T | |
| Motorola Moto G200 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (25 - 51, n=26) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Realme GT 2 | |
| Realme GT 2 Pro | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G | |
| Xiaomi 11T | |
| Motorola Moto G200 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (19 - 32, n=26) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| Realme GT 2 | Realme GT 2 Pro | OnePlus Nord 2 5G | Xiaomi 11T | Motorola Moto G200 5G | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 11% | 6% | -22% | -8% | 15% | 25% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1914.4 | 1749 -9% | 1827 -5% | 1790 -6% | 1898 -1% | 1742 ? -9% | 1882 ? -2% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 776 | 1225 58% | 1256 62% | 942 21% | 712 -8% | 1160 ? 49% | 1467 ? 89% |
| Random Read 4KB | 283.6 | 273 -4% | 223.7 -21% | 139.3 -51% | 155.9 -45% | 286 ? 1% | 278 ? -2% |
| Random Write 4KB | 267.3 | 264 -1% | 239 -11% | 133.3 -50% | 322.5 21% | 319 ? 19% | 310 ? 16% |
温度
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Realme GT 2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (17.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Realme GT 2 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Realme GT 2 Pro | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=209, last 2 years) | |
| Realme GT 2 | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G200 5G | |
| Xiaomi 11T | |
Pros
Cons
结论--不这样做也是值得的
这款手机 realme GT 2 Pro在成本方面属于上层，而realme GT 2已经可以以中档价格购买。为了降低价格，你不得不选择较老的 骁龙888，这仍然是去年的高端处理器，完全可以满足大多数应用程序，并保证系统的流畅。
全高清屏幕的分辨率没有专业机型那么精细，但它非常明亮，并能以4个步骤调整其刷新率。在专业机型中出现的外壳周围的金属框架没有了。如果你不需要高端手机，考虑到高达250欧元（约263美元）的折扣，这些都是你实际上可以接受的差异。
主摄像头的传感器仍然与GT 2 Pro相同。 GT 2 Pro然而，在我们的评测样本中，广角摄像头没有像素分选，所以感光度并不高。然而，就图像质量而言，这种差异几乎不可见。GT 2最多可以录制4K视频，而且变焦功能也有限。
realme GT 2 Pro以良好的价格提供了大量的动力和长的运行时间，但相机没有那么灵活。
总的来说，GT 2的性价比比Pro机型还要高。与竞争对手相比，它的价格仍然略高，但你得到的是一部装备精良的中高档手机。缺少无线充电等功能也不会因为价格低而受到影响。
然而，在我们的测试中，专业机型提供的运行时间略长。录像机 摩托罗拉Moto G200提供了一个扩展的桌面模式，以实现全新的应用可能性，但缺少一个用于相机的光学图像稳定器，例如。
价格和可用性
realme GT 2可直接从制造商处购买https://buy.realme.com/eu/goods/201550-600欧元（约578-631美元）。notebooksbilliger.de仍然以制造商的价格出售。该智能手机可在amazon.de和Cyberport.de也有。
Realme GT 2
- 08/30/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
