vivo Y72 5G智能手机评测--拥有高分辨率屏幕的5G中端手机
Possible competitors in comparison
Rating | Rating Version | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price from |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Vivo Y72 5G Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2 | 193 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.58" | 2408x1080 | |
| 79.2 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 06 / 2021 | Motorola Moto G50 SD 480, Adreno 619 | 192 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 83.7 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2021 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro SD 732G, Adreno 618 | 193 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 79.3 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03 / 2021 | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3 | 205 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 |
外壳、设备和操作--物美价廉的内存
虽然vivo已经成为亚洲最大的智能手机制造商之一，但在欧洲的销售仍然相对较新。Vivo Y72 5G是该制造商希望获得市场份额的设备之一。这是一款中档手机，售价不到300欧元（约353美元），配备5G，而且应该有一个特别高的分辨率摄像头。
从外观上看，这款智能手机有两个版本。Dream Glow，提供从乳白色到紫色和蓝色的颜色渐变，或者Graphite Black，从浅灰色到深灰色的渐变，因此更加隐蔽。在正面，只有一个小的水滴状凹槽用于放置摄像头。
塑料外壳并不依赖大猩猩玻璃（或者说vivo没有获得命名许可）。因此，很难评估显示屏有多大的保护作用，以避免破损。总的来说，机箱看起来很稳定，拿在手里感觉很舒服。
凭借8GB的内存和128GB的UFS 2.1闪存，vivo Y72 5G在存储方面的配置在其价格范围内非常好。还支持用于移动支付服务的NFC。
在移动网络多样性方面，支持5G当然值得注意，也支持一些4G网络，但vivo Y72 5G不是一款真正的手机。Wi-Fi模块支持Wi-Fi 5，因此在vivo Y72 5G的价格范围内实现了良好的传输速率。
Android 11被安装在智能手机上。在测试时，安全补丁是2021年6月的，因此仍然是相当最新的。制造商将自己的Funtouch OS界面放在正常的Android ，不幸的是，还在智能手机上安装了一些广告应用程序，但它们可以很快速和容易地被卸载。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Vivo Y72 5G (Angelbird V60) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Motorola Moto G50 (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Vivo Y72 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G50 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
| Vivo Y72 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G50 | |
摄像机 - 可惜没有超清视频
vivo手机有一个6400万像素的主摄像头，一个800万像素的广角镜头的摄像头，以及一个200万像素的微距摄像头。镜头之间的切换只能通过直接选择来实现，否则只有数字变焦。
主摄像头的照片通常以像素分档方式记录。这意味着每个4个像素被合并成一个像素。这导致了更高的出光率，而且分辨率仍然相当高，为1600万像素。如果你真的想拍摄6400万像素分辨率的照片，还有一种特殊模式。
主摄像头的照片总体上处于较高的水平，但仍然可以有更多的动态和对比度。细节显示得很好。在低光和高亮度的差异中，缺乏动态是特别明显的。在黑暗的地方，几乎没有任何东西可以被识别。至少在非常黑暗的场景中，仍然可以在照片中看到一些东西。
广角摄像头能拍出好照片，但你不应该把它放大太多，但这对其他智能手机也不是一个好主意。
那些想录制超清视频的人将对vivo手机感到失望。只有1080p，最高60帧的视频是可能的。然而，我们非常喜欢这里的质量。自动对焦的反应稍有延迟，但随后迅速而可靠，曝光变化没有明显的梯度。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera FlowerMain camera EnvironmentMain camera Low LightWide-angle lens
显示屏 - 有点太暗，对比度小
在这个价格范围内，全高清显示屏绝不是理所当然的事。很好，vivo选择了高分辨率的面板。亮度通常足以满足日常使用，但智能手机如 小米Redmi Note 10 Pro实现了更好的峰值亮度，这有助于提高能见度，特别是在户外的晴天。
同时，vivo Y72 5G显示屏的黑值以及由此产生的对比度并不令人信服。因此，颜色看起来有点苍白。另一方面，色彩还原度还算不错。最多，灰度显示出非常轻微的偏蓝。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 419 cd/m²
Contrast: 599:1 (Black: 0.7 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.32 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.203
| Vivo Y72 5G IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Motorola Moto G50 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G TFT-LCD, 1600x720, 6.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -52% | 91% | -82% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42 ? | 52 ? -24% | 2.8 ? 93% | 66.8 ? -59% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 20 ? | 36 ? -80% | 2.4 ? 88% | 40.8 ? -104% |
| PWM Frequency | 2336 ? | 490.2 ? | ||
| Screen | 17% | 48% | -14% | |
| Brightness middle | 419 | 340 -19% | 653 56% | 543 30% |
| Brightness | 384 | 325 -15% | 651 70% | 512 33% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 92 6% | 98 13% | 85 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.7 | 0.18 74% | 0.63 10% | |
| Contrast | 599 | 1889 215% | 862 44% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.32 | 4.75 -43% | 1.2 64% | 4.9 -48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.06 | 7.53 -49% | 2.9 43% | 8.6 -70% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3 | 3.9 -30% | 1.8 40% | 6.3 -110% |
| Gamma | 2.203 100% | 2.224 99% | 2.25 98% | 2.23 99% |
| CCT | 7236 90% | 7384 88% | 6426 101% | 8120 80% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -18% /
4% | 70% /
58% | -48% /
-28% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命--其他的持续时间甚至更长
随着 联发科Dimensity 700vivo做了一个很好的选择：评测样本的性能与竞争对手持平，甚至在某些方面还有点高。图形单元也提供了合适的性能率。在大多数情况下，这对于日常使用应该是足够的。只有非常苛刻的应用程序和游戏才会显示其性能限制。
UFS 2.1内存总体上非常快，只有连续写入时有轻微的弱点。
在持续负载后，外壳加热到最高41.5℃（106.7°F）。这仍然在通常的范围内，但在非常高的环境温度下触摸智能手机可能会变得令人不快。
由于vivo的音频增强模式，底部边缘的单声道扬声器在需要时可以变得相当响亮，然后声音足以满足一个正常大小的房间。对于这样一个小的扬声器来说，声音是不错的，但仍然是相当的高音驱动。在我们的测试中，我们倾向于将音量调低一些，这样高音就不会在耳朵里发出令人不快的声音。
外部音频设备可以通过一个3.5毫米音频插孔或蓝牙连接。然而，没有改善无线音频的aptX。
5,000毫安时的电池在尺寸上与同类产品相当，在WLAN测试中的运行时间也不错，刚刚超过18小时。然而，小米和三星的对比设备仍然可以多用几个小时。运行时间应该足以满足两天的正常使用。充电时，最大功率为18瓦，交货范围内包括一个相应的充电器。当电池为空时，充电只需要不到1:30小时。
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Vivo Y72 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G50 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (12 - 28, n=11) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 166, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Vivo Y72 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G50 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (13 - 16, n=11) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Vivo Y72 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G50 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7.9 - 17, n=11) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Vivo Y72 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G50 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (5.2 - 6, n=11) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| Vivo Y72 5G | Motorola Moto G50 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 318% | 446% | 674% | 507% | 2739% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 956 | 392 -59% | 512 -46% | 858 -10% | 760 ? -21% | 1887 ? 97% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 13.6 | 204.4 1403% | 268 1871% | 381.7 2707% | 297 ? 2084% | 1471 ? 10716% |
| Random Read 4KB | 164.4 | 89.2 -46% | 146.5 -11% | 174.6 6% | 152.9 ? -7% | 278 ? 69% |
| Random Write 4KB | 179.4 | 131.7 -27% | 126.7 -29% | 167.1 -7% | 131.6 ? -27% | 311 ? 73% |
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Vivo Y72 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Vivo Y72 5G 5000 mAh | Motorola Moto G50 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 5020 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G 5000 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi Websurfing | 1084 | 1198 11% | 753 -31% | 1235 14% | 991 ? -9% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 装备精良的5G中端产品
vivo Y72 5G提供了良好的存储，5G，高分辨率的屏幕，时尚的外壳，以及在其价格范围内良好的性能率。因此，它满足了人们对中档智能手机的许多要求。
当然，当你看对比设备时，电池应该持续更长的时间，而预装的广告应用程序总是令人讨厌的。相机图片和屏幕的低对比度也会让用户感到厌烦。
vivo用Y72 5G管理了一款装备精良的中档手机，可以超越许多对手。
然而，那些不关心这些细节的人应该仔细看看这款亚洲手机。毕竟，你的钱得到了相当多的东西，我们在审查中没有发现任何重大缺陷。
关于竞争，简单说一下。如果你不需要5G，你会得到一个好的价格与 小米Redmi Note 10 Pro和 三星Galaxy A32 5G持续时间甚至更长。
价格和可用性
在测试时，vivo Y72 5G在互联网上的价格通常为299欧元（约352美元）。你可以从我们的借贷网站Cyberport获得它。，但也可以在notebooksbilliger.de或其他零售商。
Vivo Y72 5G
- 07/22/2021 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
