Notebookcheck Logo

小米11T智能手机评论。预算价格下的高端功能

没有 "米 "也不错。

小米用11T赢得了公众的青睐:这款6.67英寸的智能手机提供了高端功能,包括120赫兹的显示屏、玻璃机身和67瓦的快速充电,但它的价格比竞争对手的旗舰机要低得多。11T并不总是处于顶端,但它在许多方面的表现都高于平均水平。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

通过11T和11T Pro,小米在其阵容中拥有两款新的智能手机,由于其混合了高端功能和适度的价格而令人感兴趣。两者都提供了一个6.67英寸的AMOLED面板,运行频率为120赫兹,据说SDR内容的亮度可达800 cd/m²,HDR的亮度甚至可达1000 cd/m²。与之相伴的是8GB的LPDDR4x内存,至少128GB的UFS 3.1闪存,以及一个108MP的摄像头。

虽然11T Pro由Snapdragon 888 ,但11T配备的是MediaTek Dimensity 1200 ,这也是一个高端SoC。只有专业机型提供对杜比视界的支持,以及哈曼卡顿立体声扬声器和120瓦的充电器。11T "只能 "以67瓦的功率充电,这仍然可以让智能手机的电池在36分钟内从0%快速充到100%。

11T的配置稍轻,这反映在较低的价格上。小米11T比11T Pro便宜100欧元(约116美元),它的低容量128GB版本价格为550欧元(约635美元)。

Xiaomi 11T (11 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 8 x 2 - 3 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G77 MP9
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, HDR10 , glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 102 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, ambient light sensor, accelerometer, gyroscope, electronic compass, linear motor, IR blaster, barometer, color temperature sensor, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, IR blaster
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (B2/3/5/8), 3G (B1/2/4/5/8/19), 4G (B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/26/28/32/38/40/41/42/66), 5G (n1/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/66/77/78), Head SAR 0.554 W/kg, Body SAR 0.954 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 164.1 x 76.9
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (f/1.75, 1/1.52", 0.7 µm, 4-in-1 Super Pixel, AF); 8 MP Ultra Wide Angle (f/2.2, 120˚); 5 MP Telemacro (f/2.4, AF)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.45, 1.0 µm
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, 67-watt charger, USB-C cable, SIM eject tool, protective case, Quick Start guide, warranty card, MIUI 12.5, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
203 g, Power Supply: 103 g
Price
550 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
86.6 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Xiaomi 11T
Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9
203 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
85.4 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2021
Motorola Moto G100
SD 870, Adreno 650
207 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2520x1080
85.1 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9
189 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
87.9 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2020
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
SD 865, Adreno 650
190 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
85.9 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2021
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
SD 780G 5G, Adreno 642
159 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080

外壳 - 两侧有玻璃

与11T专业版一样,小米11T采用了6.67英寸的外壳,配有平面AMOLED显示屏,冲孔摄像头,以及大猩猩玻璃Victus。据显示屏制造商康宁公司称,这款玻璃的抗划伤能力是前代大猩猩6号玻璃的两倍,它应该能让手机经受住从两米高处掉落而不至于玻璃碎裂。小米在11T的大猩猩玻璃Victus上面加了一层保护膜。

背面也有玻璃。玻璃后盖看起来像拉丝金属,有 "天蓝色"、"陨石灰 "和 "月光白 "三种颜色。小米11T Pro也有同样的颜色。两边都是由金属框架连接,这导致了一个非常稳定和高质量的装置。屏幕与机身的比例为85%,非常稳固。尽管如此,对于一款有旗舰雄心的智能手机来说,屏幕边框可以更窄一点。

我们的评测样品的 "陨石灰 "后盖由于其反射而引人注目,但它也非常容易受到指纹的影响。你可以通过把11T放在盒子里的透明保护罩里来避免这些。这也使10800万像素摄像头的驼峰变得均匀,它的厚度约为2毫米,防止智能手机放在桌子上时来回晃动。

天蓝色 "和 "月光白 "在视觉上比 "陨石灰 "型号更谨慎。两者都缺乏灰色后盖的光泽金属外观,而是采用了哑光表面。

11T没有IP认证。但这在专业机型中也是缺失的。

Size comparison

168.4 mm 74 mm 9.7 mm 207 g164.1 mm 76.9 mm 8.8 mm 203 g159.8 mm 74.5 mm 8.4 mm 190 g159.1 mm 73.3 mm 8.3 mm 189 g160.53 mm 75.72 mm 6.81 mm 159 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 没有耳机插孔或微型SD插槽

小米11T的三种颜色版本都配备了8GB的LPDDR4x内存。此外,还有两种存储版本。在测试时,128GB的智能手机在小米商店的价格为550欧元(约合635美元)。256GB的较大存储版本将使你花费600欧元(约合693美元)。由于没有microSD插槽,内部存储无法扩展。

SIM卡槽可以容纳两张nano SIM卡,这两张卡都支持同时5G连接。NFC和蓝牙5.2也是配置的一部分。USB-C端口以USB 2.0的速度运行,也取代了耳机插孔。这款智能手机配有一个3.5毫米音频插孔适配器。

左边:没有端口
左边:没有端口
右边。音量摇杆、电源按钮
右边。音量摇杆、电源按钮
顶部:红外辐射器、扬声器、麦克风
顶部:红外辐射器、扬声器、麦克风
底部。扬声器、USB-C 2.0、麦克风、双SIM卡插槽
底部。扬声器、USB-C 2.0、麦克风、双SIM卡插槽

软件--Android 14也是为了到11T来。

小米11T运行Android 11,在此基础上,小米应用了其内部用户界面MIUI 12.5版本。在测试时(10月中旬,MIUI 12.5.5版本),Android 安全补丁处于2021年8月1日的水平,因此仍然是相当最新的。这款智能手机支持DRM Widevine L1,这使得它能够以高清质量显示流媒体内容。

除了少数小米工具,只有少数预装的第三方应用程序和游戏,包括亚马逊、Facebook和TikTok,以及游戏PUBG Mobile和Lord Mobile的下载链接。不需要这些应用程序的用户可以将它们全部卸载。我们的128GB测试版11T开箱后有大约102GB的可用存储空间。

小米用更新保证提出了一个购买理由。据称,11T的三个额外的Android ,以及四年的安全更新都有保证。这意味着买家可以期待11T获得Android 12、13和14。

通信和GNSS - 快速的Wi-Fi,精确的GPS

小米11T通过蓝牙5.2、NFC进行通信,同时还有两个SIM卡插槽,都可以同时建立5G连接。它涵盖了德语区所有重要的频段,有21个4G频率和13个5G频率,包括LTE频段20和28,以及5G频率n1、n3、n28和n78。

说到WLAN,这款智能手机使用Wi-Fi 6(WLAN a/b/g/n/ac/ax);它在我们的Netgear Nighthawk AX12参考路由器上显示出强大的性能,这与OnePlus Nord 2 5G小米11 Lite 5G 。另一个优点是。在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,数据传输的执行速度几乎一直很高。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
891 (847min - 921max) MBit/s +1%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
888 (842min - 904max) MBit/s 0%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
884 (817min - 939max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
699 (347min - 764max) MBit/s -21%
Motorola Moto G100
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
692 (643min - 704max) MBit/s -22%
iperf3 receive AX12
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
877 (657min - 928max) MBit/s +5%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
874 (833min - 900max) MBit/s +5%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
836 (737min - 887max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
798 (409min - 853max) MBit/s -5%
Motorola Moto G100
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
788 (733min - 833max) MBit/s -6%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
Xiaomi 11T MediaTek Dimensity 1200, ARM Mali-G77 MP9; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø835 (737-887)
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø787 (733-833)
OnePlus Nord 2 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1200, ARM Mali-G77 MP9; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø877 (657-928)
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Qualcomm Adreno 650; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø783 (409-853)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø873 (833-900)
Xiaomi 11T MediaTek Dimensity 1200, ARM Mali-G77 MP9; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø885 (817-939)
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø692 (643-704)
OnePlus Nord 2 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1200, ARM Mali-G77 MP9; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø887 (842-904)
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Qualcomm Adreno 650; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø687 (347-764)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø891 (847-921)
室内的GPS接收
室内的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收

11T在GPS(L1,L5)、伽利略(E1,E5a)、格洛纳斯(L1)、北斗(B1)和QZSS(L1,L5)卫星导航系统的帮助下确定其当前位置。在室内,它在测试中精确到两米;在室外,它甚至精确到一米。

在我们的实际测试中,11T的表现也令人印象深刻。在一次10公里的自行车骑行中,它追踪的路线几乎与Garmin Edge 500专业导航设备一样准确。因此,使用智能手机进行导航应该没有问题。

GPS测试。摘要
GPS测试。摘要
GPS测试。湖泊
GPS测试。湖泊
GPS测试。转折点
GPS测试。转折点

电话和通话质量 - VoLTE和VoWiFi,低SAR水平

小米智能手机在沃达丰网络中提供良好的通话质量,即使在使用免提模式时也是如此。在我们的测试电话中,我们没有遇到掉线或其他干扰。使用1600万像素自拍相机进行视频通话也没有问题。小米11T支持VoLTE和WLAN通话。

SAR水平为0.554瓦/千克(头部)和0.954瓦/千克(身体),该智能手机的辐射相当低。

相机 - 108MP,与11T Pro相比只有小的缺点

用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片

就像11T Pro一样,小米11T配备了10800万像素的三摄设置(f/1.75),通过像素分层将9个像素组合成一个 "超级像素",在标准模式下产生12MP照片(3000x4000像素)。然而,在 "108M "模式下,也可以使用全部108MP。自拍相机的分辨率为16MP,它在视频通话中提供了坚实的图像质量,在每秒30帧的情况下实现了最大的1080p。

108MP相机在光线良好的情况下拍摄的照片确实不错,显示出许多细节,并以高动态范围得分。在较低的照明条件下,如我们在右边的样本照片中看到的那样,色彩光谱有点向温暖的一面转移,但图像质量仍然一样好。即使是夜景拍摄也不会给小米11T带来太多问题,与许多竞争对手的智能手机不同。如果还有足够的光线,主摄像头在 "夜景 "模式下仍能获得相对大量的主体细节。

相机三人组的超广角镜头的分辨率为800万像素(f/2.2,120°);它使用的白平衡与主相机略有不同,它仍然可以产生相当好的照片。然而,与1.08亿像素的摄像头相比,图像质量明显下降,照片在边缘处变得模糊不清。如果你激活 "超级微距 "模式,长焦相机就会启动(f/2.4),在三到七厘米的对焦范围内工作--总体来说是个不错的补充,但也不过如此。

主摄像头以最高4K和每秒30帧的速度记录视频,并有电子图像稳定系统的帮助,在实践中效果相当好。我们也非常喜欢它的图像质量。不幸的是,录像时不可能像11T Pro那样在主镜头和广角镜头之间切换。在使用主摄像头时,你也不得不放弃60FPS的4K视频,以及使用自拍镜时60FPS的1080视频--这两个功能只有11T Pro才有。

用自拍相机拍摄的照片
用自拍相机拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用广角相机拍摄的照片
用广角相机拍摄的照片

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight-Scene 1Daylight-Scene 2Ultra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light photography
orginal image
click to load images

我们再仔细看看相机在受控照明条件下的表现。在测试实验室和最佳照明条件下(上色图),主摄像头全面准确地再现了色彩。然而,在低环境光下,它达到了极限(1勒克斯的下层色彩图),因为色彩准确性在这里明显下降,在其他清晰的测试图上只能看到模糊的轮廓。

ColorChecker
7.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 11T: 6.03 ∆E min: 2.92 - max: 11.42 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
38.6 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
60.8 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
29 ∆E
63.6 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
46.9 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
74.7 ∆E
42.7 ∆E
41.3 ∆E
88.5 ∆E
70.2 ∆E
52 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 11T: 45.99 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 88.48 ∆E

配件和保修 - 包括67瓦的充电器

小米11T包括一个67瓦的充电器,一条USB-C电缆(Type-C转Type-A),一个SIM卡工具,一个透明保护壳,一个3.5毫米音频插孔适配器,一份快速启动指南,以及一份保修信息手册。

该设备有12个月的保修期。

输入设备和处理 - 480赫兹采样率和120赫兹刷新率

由于其480赫兹的采样率和120赫兹的最大刷新率,小米11T可以非常流畅地操作。与其他高端智能手机一样,小米设备给人的印象是在其电容式触摸屏上快速显示内容不需要任何努力。

小米11T可以用指纹进行生物识别解锁,工作迅速而可靠。通过二维面部识别进行认证也是可能的,但它的安全性较低。反过来说,只要显示屏足够亮,即使在环境光线不足的情况下,解锁过程也能顺利进行。

键盘 - 景观
键盘 - 景观
键盘 - 肖像
键盘 - 肖像

显示 - 可以达到1,000cd/m²的亮度

子像素网格
子像素网格

小米11T的AMOLED显示屏的分辨率为2400x1080像素。就6.67英寸的对角线而言,这导致了395PPI的像素密度,这确保了图像的清晰度。在Android ,刷新率可以设置为60或120赫兹,后者可以提供特别流畅的再现。

11T还可以根据图像内容动态地调整帧率。这样一来,30赫兹和90赫兹也可以分别用60赫兹和120赫兹。11T还支持HDR10+。不过,杜比视界是为11T Pro保留的。

名义上,AMOLED显示屏可达到800cd/m²,使用HDR内容甚至可达到1000cd/m²。11T在测试实验室的表现非常好。平均而言,该面板在白色背景下达到的亮度略低于782 cd/m²,最大亮度为809 cd/m²。在均匀分布的明亮和黑暗图像区域(APL50),最大亮度增加到975 cd/m²,而在亮度传感器关闭的情况下,最大亮度为485 cd/m²。我们测量的最低亮度为2.28cd/m²。

作为典型的OLED,小米智能手机也使用脉冲宽度调制(PWM)进行亮度控制,这对敏感的用户来说可能是个麻烦。显示设置中的 "防闪烁模式 "可以帮助解决这个问题。然而,这意味着告别了120赫兹,因为刷新率被设置为60赫兹。

在显示器亮度在42%和100%之间时,PWM频率为120.2赫兹,而在14%和42%之间的水平上,它位于471.7和500赫兹之间的范围。低于这个水平(亮度<14%),它在162.3和490.2赫兹之间波动。

766
cd/m²
776
cd/m²
796
cd/m²
768
cd/m²
781
cd/m²
809
cd/m²
761
cd/m²
780
cd/m²
798
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 809 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 781.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.28 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 781 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Xiaomi 11T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Motorola Moto G100
IPS/LTPS, 2520x1080, 6.7"
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"
Screen
-97%
-45%
-12%
-32%
Brightness middle
781
562
-28%
594
-24%
714
-9%
863
10%
Brightness
782
535
-32%
594
-24%
721
-8%
860
10%
Brightness Distribution
94
90
-4%
99
5%
95
1%
93
-1%
Black Level *
0.57
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2
3.99
-100%
2.74
-37%
1.8
10%
3.2
-60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.9
9.74
-236%
6
-107%
5.1
-76%
5.2
-79%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
6.5
-183%
4.2
-83%
2
13%
3.9
-70%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.174 101%
2.278 97%
2.16 102%
2.33 94%
CCT
6852 95%
6882 94%
7322 89%
6588 99%
7299 89%
Contrast
986

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120.2 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 120.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 120.2 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

小米11T的显示屏提供了几种颜色方案可供选择。默认设置为 "鲜艳 "模式,同时还提供 "饱和 "和 "原色 "模式。用户还可以在sRGB和DCI-P3之间切换色彩空间。使用 "饱和 "色彩方案并将色温调整为 "暖",可以实现最准确的色彩再现。

色彩准确性("鲜艳 "色彩方案,"温暖 "色温,DCI-P3目标色彩空间)。
色彩准确性("鲜艳 "色彩方案,"温暖 "色温,DCI-P3目标色彩空间)。
色彩空间("鲜艳 "色彩方案,"温暖 "色温,DCI-P3目标色彩空间)。
色彩空间("鲜艳 "色彩方案,"温暖 "色温,DCI-P3目标色彩空间)。
灰度("鲜艳 "色彩方案,"温暖 "色温,DCI-P3目标色彩空间
灰度("鲜艳 "色彩方案,"温暖 "色温,DCI-P3目标色彩空间
色彩饱和度("鲜艳 "色彩方案,"温暖 "色温,DCI-P3目标色彩空间)。
色彩饱和度("鲜艳 "色彩方案,"温暖 "色温,DCI-P3目标色彩空间)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

由于其明亮的AMOLED显示屏,小米11T可以在户外轻松使用。即使在阳光直射下,屏幕内容仍然可以被很好地识别。该设备的视角稳定性也得到了良好的评价。即使从极端的角度,也能完美地观看内容。

室外使用(阳光直射)。
室外使用(阳光直射)。
室外使用(在阴凉处)。
室外使用(在阴凉处)。
视角
视角

性能 - 联发科的SoC,功率很大

小米11T的性能来自高端,联发科Dimensity 1200SoC及其ARM Mali-G77 MP9图形芯片。就性能而言,这套CPU/GPU组合大致介于小米11 Lite 5G小米11 Lite 5G骁龙865三星Galaxy S20 FE 5G

摩托罗拉Moto G100中的骁龙870 ,当然,小米11T Pro中的骁龙888,比联发科Dimensity 1200的功率还要大。不过,这些性能差异在日常使用中并不明显,因为可用的功率总是绰绰有余。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
857 Points
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
972 Points +13%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
809 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
903 Points +5%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
809 Points -6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (809 - 857, n=2)
833 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1037 Points +21%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
2916 Points
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
2870 Points -2%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
2463 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3252 Points +12%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2998 Points +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (2463 - 2916, n=2)
2690 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3464 Points +19%
Vulkan Score 5.5 (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
5078 Points
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3369 Points -34%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4501 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3017 Points -41%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2805 Points -45%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (4501 - 5078, n=2)
4790 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (79 - 21892, n=47, last 2 years)
8171 Points +61%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
5037 Points
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3555 Points -29%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4726 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3123 Points -38%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2809 Points -44%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (4726 - 5037, n=2)
4882 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (459 - 18407, n=42, last 2 years)
8129 Points +61%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
12120 Points
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
8486 Points -30%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
11218 Points -7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (8486 - 12120, n=2)
10303 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=198, last 2 years)
13154 Points +9%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8868 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6989 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)
4204 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
11632 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
8588 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)
4740 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
4841 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4233 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)
3303 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
8041 Points
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
8035 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
9213 Points +15%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5587 Points -31%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  ()
8041 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)
11109 Points +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
11770 Points
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
13531 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
11956 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
8380 Points -29%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  ()
11770 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)
19708 Points +67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
3813 Points
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3318 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
5110 Points +34%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2567 Points -33%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  ()
3813 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)
5001 Points +31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
7500 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5098 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=70, last 2 years)
3006 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8629 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6087 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=70, last 2 years)
3166 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
5144 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3144 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=70, last 2 years)
3260 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
7256 Points
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
6960 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
7517 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4478 Points -38%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  ()
7256 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 23762, n=164, last 2 years)
8210 Points +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
8353 Points
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
10199 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8633 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6148 Points -26%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  ()
8353 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 40163, n=164, last 2 years)
12348 Points +48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
4971 Points
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3296 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
5176 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2354 Points -53%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  ()
4971 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 10632, n=164, last 2 years)
4746 Points -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
6174 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4699 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6635, n=69, last 2 years)
2784 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
7618 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5785 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 7971, n=69, last 2 years)
3009 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
Points
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3712 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2795 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 4198, n=69, last 2 years)
2686 Points
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
4179 Points
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
4166 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4208 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3832 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3196 Points -24%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (4179 - 4208, n=2)
4194 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=113, last 2 years)
2801 Points -33%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
4194 Points
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
4152 Points -1%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4214 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3826 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3212 Points -23%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (4194 - 4214, n=2)
4204 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 25785, n=189, last 2 years)
7889 Points +88%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1291 Points
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1283 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
865 Points -33%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (1283 - 1291, n=2)
1287 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=195, last 2 years)
2172 Points +68%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1205 Points
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1256 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
786 Points -35%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (1205 - 1256, n=2)
1231 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=193, last 2 years)
2166 Points +80%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
116 fps
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps -22%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
59 fps -49%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
118 fps +2%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
90 fps -22%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (59 - 116, n=2)
87.5 fps -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)
86.6 fps -25%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
185 fps
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
224 fps +21%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
178 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
207 fps +12%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
153 fps -17%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (178 - 185, n=2)
181.5 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=174, last 2 years)
296 fps +60%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
106 fps
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
89 fps -16%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
60 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
111 fps +5%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
79 fps -25%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (60 - 106, n=2)
83 fps -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)
76.1 fps -28%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
122 fps
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
131 fps +7%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
124 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
119 fps -2%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
90 fps -26%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (122 - 124, n=2)
123 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years)
175 fps +43%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
75 fps
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
79 fps +5%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
58 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
83 fps +11%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
57 fps -24%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (58 - 75, n=2)
66.5 fps -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)
66.7 fps -11%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
79 fps
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
92 fps +16%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
77 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
84 fps +6%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
65 fps -18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (77 - 79, n=2)
78 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years)
124.3 fps +57%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
44 fps
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
47 fps +7%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
41 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
48 fps +9%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
35 fps -20%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (41 - 44, n=2)
42.5 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 154, n=175, last 2 years)
49.5 fps +13%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
46 fps
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
57 fps +24%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
47 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
51 fps +11%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
40 fps -13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (46 - 47, n=2)
46.5 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 216, n=174, last 2 years)
74.8 fps +63%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
49 fps
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
49 fps 0%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
48 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
48 fps -2%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
42 fps -14%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (48 - 49, n=2)
48.5 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 166, n=207, last 2 years)
50.7 fps +3%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
53 fps
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
57 fps +8%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
54 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
47 fps -11%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
50 fps -6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (53 - 54, n=2)
53.5 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years)
84.9 fps +60%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
33 fps
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
31 fps -6%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
31 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
32 fps -3%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
26 fps -21%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (31 - 33, n=2)
32 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=208, last 2 years)
39.2 fps +19%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
21 fps
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
22 fps +5%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
21 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
20 fps -5%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
18 fps -14%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (21 - 21, n=2)
21 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 129, n=208, last 2 years)
34.3 fps +63%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
570375 Points
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
678958 Points +19%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
604538 Points +6%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
521880 Points -9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (570375 - 604538, n=2)
587457 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)
810694 Points +42%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
540464 Points
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
588115 Points +9%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
534286 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
572485 Points +6%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
468196 Points -13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (534286 - 540464, n=2)
537375 Points -1%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
5034 Score
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
7402 Score +47%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
5397 Score +7%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
Score -100%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (5034 - 5397, n=2)
5216 Score +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years)
5819 Score +16%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
71546 Points
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
71083 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6472 Points -91%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (71083 - 71546, n=2)
71315 Points 0%
Basemark GPU 1.2
1280x720 OpenGL Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
361.3 fps
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
262.8 fps -27%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (263 - 361, n=2)
312 fps -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (175.5 - 549, n=10, last 2 years)
302 fps -16%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
54.9 fps
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
80.6 fps +47%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
63.4 fps +15%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
55 (26.87min - 84.59max) fps 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (54.9 - 63.4, n=2)
59.2 fps +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.08 - 382, n=61, last 2 years)
99.2 fps +81%
OpenGL Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
51 fps
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
68.5 fps +34%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
62.3 fps +22%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
49.69 (25.09min - 83.87max) fps -3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (51 - 62.3, n=2)
56.7 fps +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.3 - 284, n=58, last 2 years)
83.5 fps +64%
1280x720 Vulkan Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
340 fps
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
518 fps +52%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
221.6 fps -35%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
327.6 (128.58min - 2098.43max) fps -4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (222 - 340, n=2)
281 fps -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70.3 - 15608, n=61, last 2 years)
712 fps +109%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
44.45 fps
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
74.2 fps +67%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
71.3 fps +60%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
47.98 (24.754min - 71.53max) fps +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (44.5 - 71.3, n=2)
57.9 fps +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.75 - 2418, n=61, last 2 years)
141.8 fps +219%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
41.73 fps
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
63.8 fps +53%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
63.7 fps +53%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
52.6 (25.32min - 86.8max) fps +26%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (41.7 - 63.7, n=2)
52.7 fps +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 303, n=60, last 2 years)
86.2 fps +107%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
5319 Points
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
5916 Points +11%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
5130 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
5555 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5068 Points -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (5130 - 5319, n=2)
5225 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)
6499 Points +22%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
9292 Points
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
8852 Points -5%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
9622 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
9458 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
9557 Points +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (9292 - 9622, n=2)
9457 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)
10346 Points +11%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
7144 Points
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
6757 Points -5%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
7277 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
5304 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6172 Points -14%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (7144 - 7277, n=2)
7211 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)
7058 Points -1%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
7516 Points
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
11431 Points +52%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
7754 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
11833 Points +57%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
7202 Points -4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (7516 - 7754, n=2)
7635 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)
17998 Points +139%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1604 Points
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
1791 Points +12%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1276 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
1604 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
1563 Points -3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  (1276 - 1604, n=2)
1440 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)
1578 Points -2%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points +140%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
91.2 Points +76%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
75.8 Points +46%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
51.8 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (51.1 - 51.8, n=2)
51.5 Points -1%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
51.1 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)
45.22 Points -13%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
160.9 Points +37%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
135.7 Points +15%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
117.6 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (108.8 - 117.6, n=2)
113.2 Points -4%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
108.8 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)
74.2 Points -37%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min +166%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chome 90)
73.6 runs/min +36%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
70.8 runs/min +31%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
54.1 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (50.2 - 54.1, n=2)
52.2 runs/min -4%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chome 92)
50.2 runs/min -7%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)
42.1 runs/min -22%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
150.2 Points +115%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
147 Points +110%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)
127 Points +81%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
106 Points +51%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
70 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (69 - 70, n=2)
69.5 Points -1%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
69 Points -1%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points +29%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
34161 Points +14%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
29912 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (26207 - 29912, n=2)
28060 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
26943 Points -10%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
26207 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)
14606 Points -51%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)
2911 ms * -102%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
1809 ms * -25%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
1802 ms * -25%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (1444 - 1809, n=2)
1627 ms * -13%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
1589 ms * -10%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * -5%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
1444 ms *

* ... smaller is better

与11T Pro一样,11T使用同样快速的UFS 3.1存储。顺序传输率非常好,但4KB的随机读写可以做一点推动。在4K速度方面,256GB版本的智能手机有可能比我们的128GB审查样本表现得更好。

Xiaomi 11TMotorola Moto G100OnePlus Nord 2 5GSamsung Galaxy S20 FE 5GXiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
36%
44%
21%
8%
31%
74%
Sequential Read 256KB
1790
1730
-3%
1827
2%
1528
-15%
949
-47%
1602 ?(1030 - 3134, n=60)
-11%
Sequential Write 256KB
942
717
-24%
1256
33%
676
-28%
710
-25%
Random Read 4KB
139.3
253.6
82%
223.7
61%
228.4
64%
207.9
49%
Random Write 4KB
133.3
252.9
90%
239
79%
218.4
64%
206.9
55%

游戏 - 它们运行顺畅,但120 FPS是例外。

小米11T可以流畅地运行现代游戏。然而,这款智能手机并不能利用其120赫兹显示屏的优势,至少在我们的测试游戏中不能。PUBG Mobile在高清设置下被限制在每秒30帧。同样的情况发生在Armajet,实际上它不应该在帧率方面限制我们。至少第三个测试游戏,Asphalt 9,以几乎恒定的60帧/秒运行。

我们使用工具Gamebench来确定帧率。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
氩氦刀
氩氦刀
沥青9
沥青9
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi 11T; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø30.2 (29-31)
Xiaomi 11T; Asphalt 9: Legends; 3.1.2a: Ø58.2 (42-61)
Xiaomi 11T; PUBG Mobile; 1.6.0: Ø29.8 (28-31)

排放 - 没有过热的问题

温度

说到热度,小米11T仍然很温和。在我们一小时的压力测试中,它只升温到最高37.1°C(约99°F),所以它总是感觉触感舒适。

这款智能手机的内部散热比OnePlus Nord 2 5G ,例如,使用相同的SoC,其内部散热要好得多。GFXBench和3DMark Wild Life的压力测试表明,虽然确实出现了节流现象,但性能下降非常低,最终几乎没有功率损失。

GFXBench T-Rex电池测试
GFXBench T-Rex电池测试
GFXBench曼哈顿电池测试
GFXBench曼哈顿电池测试
Max. Load
 37.1 °C36.6 °C33 °C 
 36.6 °C34.7 °C32.1 °C 
 36.1 °C32.8 °C31.4 °C 
Maximum: 37.1 °C
Average: 34.5 °C
30.5 °C34 °C34.1 °C
30.5 °C31.5 °C35.6 °C
28.9 °C32.5 °C35.6 °C
Maximum: 35.6 °C
Average: 32.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  27.8 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.2 (23.7min) %
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61.4 % -36%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91 (6.98min) %
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66.6 (858min) % -27%
05101520Tooltip
Xiaomi 11T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.6 (23.7-24.8)
Xiaomi 11T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø7.08 (6.98-7.67)

发言人

小米11T的顶部和底部都有扬声器。双扬声器最高可达88.6 dB(A),并支持杜比全景声。它们产生的声音很清晰,也很薄,因为低音调几乎不存在。

耳机和外部扬声器可以通过USB-C到3.5毫米音频插孔适配器连接到11T上,或通过蓝牙5.2无线连接。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037382525.628.23129.1254023.425.35036.839.46328.431.98024.836.310022.436.712519.242.916016.955.620015.650.825013.854.731513.461.940013.361.250013.865.86301268.580012.774.6100012.276.112501378.2160013.779.8200013.276.5250013.474.831501376.2400013.377.2500013.674.6630013.379.8800013.878.11000013.774.6125001463.91600013.558SPL25.588.6N0.777.4median 13.5median 74.6Delta0.79.230.429.723.323.82622.222.627.234.538.919.927.614.728.414.429.214.934.917.85118.95111.756.713.960.31361.810.364.610.467.212.472.111.175.511.278.512.779.512.381.312.680.512.780.512.780.912.777.413.576.1146613.561.314.959.2165624.890.10.678.3median 12.7median 67.21.311hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi 11TSamsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi 11T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 非常快的充电

能源消耗

在电源适配器方面,小米拿出了大杀器。11T的USB充电器,重量不到100克,容量为67瓦,据说可以在40分钟内为智能手机充满电。虽然在测试中,电池需要48分钟才能达到100%,但这仍然非常快。

然而,如果充电的每一分钟都很重要的话,小米11T Pro的120瓦电源适配器的成绩甚至更好。这应该可以让充电过程只需要17分钟。然而,专业版机型和11T都不具备无线充电的能力。

小米11T的耗电量相对较低,而且相当节俭,尤其是在负载下。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.25 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.78 / 1.86 / 1.88 Watt
Load midlight 3.98 / 8.78 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi 11T
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G100
5000 mAh
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
4250 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-15%
-4%
14%
-2%
-2%
-11%
Idle Minimum *
0.78
0.9
-15%
0.8
-3%
0.75
4%
0.83
-6%
0.79 ?(0.78 - 0.8, n=2)
-1%
Idle Average *
1.86
1.5
19%
1.2
35%
1.41
24%
1.92
-3%
1.53 ?(1.2 - 1.86, n=2)
18%
Idle Maximum *
1.88
2.1
-12%
1.6
15%
1.44
23%
1.97
-5%
Load Average *
3.98
6.7
-68%
5.7
-43%
3.84
4%
3.84
4%
4.84 ?(3.98 - 5.7, n=2)
-22%
Load Maximum *
8.78
8.5
3%
10.9
-24%
7.67
13%
8.6
2%
9.84 ?(8.78 - 10.9, n=2)
-12%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Xiaomi 11T MediaTek Dimensity 1200: Ø4.27 (1.04-9.35)
OnePlus Nord 2 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1200: Ø4.3 (2.58-5.81)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Xiaomi 11T MediaTek Dimensity 1200; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.92 (4.23-8.2)
OnePlus Nord 2 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1200; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.4 (8.61-10.1)
Xiaomi 11T MediaTek Dimensity 1200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.202 (1.149-1.311)
OnePlus Nord 2 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.216 (1.054-2.4)

电池寿命

低功耗操作和5000毫安时的电池--这一起导致了11T的长电池运行时间,然而,这在竞争中也很常见。这款智能手机在浏览网页时能持续13小时以上,在连续循环播放视频时甚至能持续24小时。因此,小米11T应该能轻松度过一整天的密集使用。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
37h 24min
WiFi Websurfing
13h 33min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
24h 10min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 27min
Xiaomi 11T
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G100
5000 mAh
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
4250 mAh
Battery Runtime
15%
-4%
-9%
-18%
Reader / Idle
2244
2846
27%
1926
-14%
2010
-10%
1509
-33%
H.264
1450
1285
-11%
1126
-22%
1232
-15%
1248
-14%
WiFi v1.3
813
1049
29%
958
18%
763
-6%
734
-10%
Load
267
302
13%
272
2%
255
-4%
223
-16%

Pros

+ 非常明亮的AMOLED显示屏,120赫兹
+ 强大的性能
+ 高质量的做工
+ 快速的Wi-Fi 6
+ 双卡双待,具有5G、VoLTE和VoWiFi功能
+ 准确的GPS
+ Android 未来三年的更新
+ 良好的108MP摄像头
+ 电池寿命长,充电时间非常短

Cons

- 没有存储扩展
- 没有IP认证
- 无耳机插孔
- 没有无线充电

评语--良好的整体包装,但有小的妥协

在审查中。小米11T。测试设备由小米德国公司提供。
在审查中。小米11T。测试设备由小米德国公司提供。

小米的T系列传统上包括具有现代高端设备许多特征的智能手机,但规格略微缩水,以便它们的价格较低。11T遵循同样的路径,在产品名称方面也是如此,因为小米在这里只是放弃了通常的 "Mi "前缀。

小米11

旗舰机相比,11T缺乏弧形屏幕,例如,其分辨率也不高。然而,还有许多其他相似之处。一个良好的10800万像素的摄像头,一个非常明亮的AMOLED显示屏,刷新率为120赫兹,以及40分钟内快速充电。由于其120瓦的电源适配器,小米11T Pro甚至能在20分钟内完成,但与11T相比,它几乎没有任何其他优势。

强大的性能,长的电池寿命,以及非常明亮的120赫兹AMOLED显示屏--小米11T提供了很大的价值。

决定安装联发科Dimensity 1200作为SoC,对钱包也有好处。虽然它的速度不如小米11和小米11T Pro中的Snapdragon 888

,但在日常使用中你不会注意到这一点。你会注意到低工作温度,因为联发科SoC使小米11T的温度比其竞争对手的骁龙888低得多,而且它几乎不需要在内部控制其性能。

11T还因其非常好的电池运行时间和小米承诺为该智能手机提供三年的操作系统更新,甚至四年的安全补丁而赢得了赞誉。这款智能手机只存在一些缺点,包括缺乏IP等级和缺少microSD插槽。

三星Galaxy S20 FE小米Poco F3是小米11T的良好替代品。两者尺寸相同,都采用了120赫兹的AMOLED显示屏,也分别采用了骁龙865和骁龙870,速度非常快,而且都以电池运行时间长而得分。

价格和可用性

在撰写本文时,你可以在newegg上找到小米11T,128GB的存储空间,价格约为779美元。.你也可以在amazon上关注。,例如,等待该设备出现在那里。

Xiaomi 11T - 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
54 / 70 → 77%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
92%
Games Performance
60 / 64 → 93%
Application Performance
79 / 86 → 91%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 86%
Camera
68%
Average
81%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米11T智能手机评论。预算价格下的高端功能
Manuel Masiero, 2021-10-31 (Update: 2024-08-15)