轻便省电，20 小时续航 - LG Gram Pro 16 笔记本电脑评测
羽量级冠军
作为一款搭载强劲酷睿 Ultra 7 处理器的 "长跑者"，LG Gram Pro 16 是旅行中的强力伴侣。不过，这款笔记本电脑在家庭娱乐中的出色音质和画面同样令人印象深刻。Marc Herter, 👁 Marc Herter (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
判决
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G 完美融入了 LG Gram 系列的传统，体现了该品牌的核心价值：轻巧、高品质的外壳和出色的电池续航能力。LG 又一次成功地开发出了一款集便携性和生产力于一身的笔记本电脑。
制造商选择了功能强大的集成图形解决方案（iGPU）而不是专用显卡，乍看之下似乎不太寻常，但实际效果却很好。这款笔记本电脑的英特尔 Arc Graphics 140V 图形处理器可为日常任务甚至一些要求更高的应用提供出色的性能。它的哑光 IPS 屏幕一改上一代产品的反射式 OLED 显示屏，具有极佳的户外可读性。
与大多数 LG Gram 笔记本电脑一样，LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G 主打移动性。这意味着与同类产品相比，它的计算能力可能略低。该笔记本电脑的基准测试结果证实了这一点。
尽管如此，LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G 仍是一款出色的笔记本电脑，适合那些需要轻便、便携、电池续航时间长的用户。高效的 Lunar Lake 处理器、77 Wh 的大容量电池和轻巧的机身使这款笔记本电脑成为外出旅行的理想伴侣。
Pros
+ 极其轻巧便携的设计
+ 高品质 IPS 显示屏
+ Wi-Fi 7 和雷电 4
+ 超长运行时间
Cons
- 在极端负荷下会出现轻微的热节流
- 外壳略有弯曲
- 英特尔 Arc 140V 无法完全赶上前代 RTX 3050
$1,795.00
LG gram Pro 16-inch OLED Thin and Lightweight Laptop, Intel Evo Edition - AI-enabled Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor, Windows 11 Home, 32GB RAM, 2TB SSD, Black
- $1,199.99LG gram Pro 16-inch 2in1 Thin and Lightweight Laptop, Intel Evo Edition - AI-enabled Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor, Windows 11 Home, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD, Touch IPS Display, Black
- $1,999.00LG Gram Pro 16 Ultra-thin and Lightweight Creator AI Laptop | 16" WQXGA+ OLED DCI-P3 100% | Intel 16-Core Ultra7 155H | 32GB DDR5 1TB SSD | Geforce RTX 3050 Graphic | Thunderbolt Win11Pro + HDMI Cable
LG 的 Gram Pro 16 是一款专为专业用户和要求苛刻的日常用户设计的设备。它将高分辨率 144 Hz 显示屏、Lunar Lake 处理器、快速固态硬盘和广泛的连接功能结合在一个轻巧的机身内，应该能为用户带来非凡的使用体验。我们上一次测试的是 配备 RTX 3050 的 Gram Pro.在这种情况下，英特尔的 Arc Graphics 140V 将不得不使用。
规格
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G (gram Pro 16 Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V 8 x 2.2 - 4.8 GHz, Lunar Lake
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, LG DISPLAY LP160WQ2-SPF1, IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Lunar Lake-MX
Storage
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU, 1024 GB
, 840 GB free
Weight
1.229 kg, Power Supply: 154 g
Price
2050 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
外壳和连接
LG 的笔记本电脑设计通常不会有太大变化。现在的 LG Gram Pro 与前代产品的区别在于 前代在一个关键细节上。LG 不再使用哑光漆面屏幕盖，而是在拉丝镁合金上使用薄层漆面，外观焕然一新。设备上的 USB-C 端口和 Wi-Fi 模块也进行了更新。
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Intel BE201 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø2340 (2334-2347)
HP Envy 16 h0112nr Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1351 (1012-1487)
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1481 (828-1722)
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1520 (1198-1919)
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Intel BE201 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø2087 (1827-2337)
HP Envy 16 h0112nr Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1263 (1021-1320)
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (1597-1698)
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1644 (1290-1772)
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Intel BE201 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1978 (1901-2024)
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø834 (802-867)
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø823 (328-1046)
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV MediaTek RZ616; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø777 (447-946)
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø947 (839-986)
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Intel BE201 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1719 (1393-1831)
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø923 (883-942)
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø900 (728-937)
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV MediaTek RZ616; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1747 (1710-1762)
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø916 (806-986)
10.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
15 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
13 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
可持续性
LG 包装的 Gram Pro 完全不含塑料。该设备还没有 PCF 文件。不过，这款笔记本电脑可以使用标准的家用工具进行拆卸。脚下有四颗十字螺丝，底板可以用塑料卡轻松拆卸。电池和固态硬盘也很容易更换。机身上还有第二个 NVMe 插槽。
输入设备
尽管 LG Gram Pro 16 的设计很薄，但它的键盘输入手感很好，具有良好的触感和稳定性。背光灯让你在黑暗环境中也能打字。宽大的触摸板（13 × 8 厘米）可实现精确导航，其手掌识别功能也非常好用。
显示屏
虽然前代机型仍然采用 OLED 面板，但 LG 在当前的设备中再次选择了 IPS 屏幕。它具有出色的对比度、亮度和色彩还原值，但响应时间并不是最好的。另一方面，它没有出现 OLED 显示屏常见的闪烁现象。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LG DISPLAY LP160WQ2-SPF1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 442 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 405.9 cd/m² Minimum: 27.7 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 442 cd/m²
Contrast: 2600:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.84 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.87, calibrated: 0.88
ΔE Greyscale 1.53 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
86.65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.96% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.173
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G LG DISPLAY LP160WQ2-SPF1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 144 Hz | Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K B160UAN04.3 (AUOA5AB), IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | HP Envy 16 h0112nr Samsung SDC4174, OLED, 3840x2400, 16", 60 Hz | LG gram Pro 16Z90SP ATNA60CL06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV Samsung ATNA60BX03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G LG Display LP170WQ1-SPF2, IPS, 2560x1600, 17", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -54% | 1% | 4% | 5% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 97.96 | 36.8 -62% | 99.3 1% | 99.8 2% | 99.9 2% | 96.3 -2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 55.3 -45% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.7 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 86.65 | 38 -56% | 88 2% | 94.6 9% | 98 13% | 85.1 -2% |
| Response Times | 26% | 95% | 70% | 99% | 32% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 47 ? | 36 ? 23% | 2 ? 96% | 6 ? 87% | 0.4 ? 99% | 25 ? 47% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 21.4 ? 29% | 1.9 ? 94% | 14 ? 53% | 0.6 ? 98% | 25 ? 17% |
| PWM Frequency | 240.4 ? | 481 | 120 ? | |||
| Screen | -280% | -62% | 237% | 1680% | -163% | |
| Brightness middle | 442 | 326 -26% | 328.8 -26% | 420 -5% | 407 -8% | 420 -5% |
| Brightness | 406 | 303 -25% | 332 -18% | 421 4% | 405 0% | 387 -5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 89 3% | 97 13% | 99 15% | 98 14% | 88 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.17 | 0.24 -41% | 0.006 96% | 0.001 99% | 0.34 -100% | |
| Contrast | 2600 | 1358 -48% | 70000 2592% | 407000 15554% | 1235 -52% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.84 | 6.48 -671% | 1.53 -82% | 1.66 -98% | 2.27 -170% | 4.32 -414% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.62 | 19.42 -1099% | 6.04 -273% | 4.92 -204% | 4.46 -175% | 8.55 -428% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.88 | 4.92 -459% | 3.39 -285% | 2.17 -147% | 1.27 -44% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.53 | 3.85 -152% | 1.3 15% | 1.3 15% | 2.3 -50% | 8.04 -425% |
| Gamma | 2.173 101% | 2.79 79% | 2.18 101% | 2.27 97% | 2.231 99% | 2.224 99% |
| CCT | 6496 100% | 6739 96% | 6362 102% | 6609 98% | 6443 101% | 8114 80% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -103% /
-188% | 11% /
-16% | 104% /
163% | 595% /
1095% | -44% /
-101% |
* ... smaller is better
LG Gram Pro 采用 D75 白点，更符合北半球的日光。电脑屏幕通常更适应 D65 白点。因此，在测量时，我们将 My-gram 应用程序中的色温设置为典型的白点。结果，笔记本电脑的色彩表现非常出色，ΔΕ2000 < 1。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 25.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8492 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Gram Pro 显示屏表面采用哑光处理，亮度高，视角稳定性好，适合户外使用。
性能
LG 的新款 Gram Pro 设备完全采用了 Lunar Lake 技术。在这种情况下，你可以选择 Core Ultra 7 和 Core Ultra 9。我们的测试设备配备的是 Ultra 7 256V。
测试条件
我们使用 "高 "功率模式对 LG Gram 进行了所有性能测试。在这种情况下，256V 的功率分别为 30 瓦（PL1）和 40 瓦（PL2）。
处理器
随着 Lunar Lake 的推出，英特尔多年来首次告别了多线程。这意味着配备 4 个 P 核和 4 个 E 核的酷睿至尊 7 256V 总共有 8 个线程。与其说 Lunar Lake 特别强大，不如说它更节能。不过，Gram Pro 的性能还是可圈可点的。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Intel Core Ultra 7 256V: Ø1518 (1499.42-1627.14)
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K AMD Ryzen AI 7 350: Ø2019 (1940.52-2419.4)
HP Envy 16 h0112nr Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2325 (2293.84-2590.34)
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H; Max Cooling: Ø1797 (1605.27-2243.28)
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1568 (1267.75-1932.27)
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV AMD Ryzen 5 8640U: Ø1650 (1640.55-1663.48)
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1375 (1298.66-2049.39)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr -2! | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4861 - 30789, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (8589 - 10768, n=4) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (1875 - 1902, n=4) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1887 - 11924, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (4038 - 4162, n=3) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (720 - 730, n=3) | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Average of class Multimedia (856 - 5224, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (1570 - 1627, n=2) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (285 - 286, n=2) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (324 - 339, n=3) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Average of class Multimedia (100 - 557, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (29095 - 130368, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (35535 - 35978, n=3) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (5616 - 5749, n=3) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4983 - 25760, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (9852 - 11026, n=4) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (2680 - 2784, n=4) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4652 - 23059, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (9302 - 9618, n=3) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (1972 - 2010, n=3) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 34.3, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (13 - 13.5, n=3) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (48.4 - 55.6, n=3) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (23.9 - 146.7, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (0.4578 - 0.4645, n=3) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5121 - 50388, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (12287 - 12812, n=3) | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 201874, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (60345 - 61614, n=3) | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1188 - 8623, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (2632 - 2814, n=3) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 181505, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (49622 - 49794, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 28794, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (4425 - 4431, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 105740, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (32020 - 32644, n=3) | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Average of class Multimedia (26066 - 169946, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (38641 - 40828, n=3) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Average of class Multimedia (440 - 2022, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (536 - 632, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2759 - 26875, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (6506 - 6878, n=3) | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (51767 - 52282, n=3) | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average of class Multimedia (12860 - 58844, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
系统性能
有了 Lunar Lake，主内存安装得特别靠近处理器。这意味着指令和数据可以快速加载。这也对系统性能产生了积极影响。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4325 - 8670, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (6711 - 6955, n=3) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8025 - 12420, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9627 - 10006, n=3) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (8832 - 9219, n=3) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10615, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9481 - 9898, n=3) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Average of class Multimedia (866 - 2255, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1636 - 1736, n=3) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2050, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1563 - 1682, n=3) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Average of class Multimedia (907 - 2795, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1862 - 1953, n=3) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Average of class Multimedia (605 - 2094, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1215 - 1343, n=3) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (243 - 310, n=3) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (282 - 286, n=3) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (472 - 480, n=3) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 6711 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (101522 - 104459, n=3) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21158 - 104459, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (86352 - 89144, n=3) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Average of class Multimedia (24312 - 125604, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (108692 - 117933, n=3) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Average of class Multimedia (24382 - 117933, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (96.1 - 99.6, n=3) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
LG Gram Pro 16 配备了快速的 1-TB SSD（三星 PM9A1a）。它能确保快速的访问时间和数据传输速率，而不会出现热节流现象。
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read:
6837MB/s
DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write:
4954MB/s
DiskSpd seq_read:
3202MB/s
DiskSpd seq_write:
2298MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read:
635MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write:
396MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read:
57.7MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write:
106.2MB/s
DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read:
6745MB/s
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6745 (5921.42-6776.53)
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6360 (2361.91-6999.04)
HP Envy 16 h0112nr Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH: Ø6437 (4756.27-6626.16)
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6074 (3285.54-6606.66)
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4953 (1690.07-6771.37)
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3024 (2607.57-3618.53)
图形卡
LG Gram Pro 16 的集成英特尔 Arc Graphics 140V 显卡在通用基准测试中的性能与前代机型的 RTX 3050 相当，但在实际应用中通常仍低于前代机型。在直接对比中，英特尔显卡潜在的更大内存在某些应用中被证明是一个优势。OpenVINO 提供的硬件加速和广泛的人工智能支持使整体表现更加完美。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 11451 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 33323 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8704 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 4133 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 724 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 3103 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender | |
| v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (509 - 700, n=21) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average of class Multimedia (160 - 1042, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (210 - 401, n=9) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (203 - 401, n=5, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8.26 - 86, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Average of class Multimedia (9.38 - 141.6, n=74, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7.61 - 141.8, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (13.3 - 233, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Average of class Multimedia (29 - 179.9, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V: Ø19 (18-20)
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M: Ø10.5 (8.25-10.8)
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU: Ø22.4 (20.3-24.2)
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU: Ø21.5 (20-22.5)
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV R5 8640U, Radeon 760M: Ø13 (10.5-15.8)
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 156.9 | 140.8 | 49.5 | 22.6 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 98.3 | 88.4 | 52 | 60 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 71.7 | 46 | 33.1 | 25.2 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 40.8 | 36.5 | 30.9 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 179.7 | 75.1 | 65 | 55.9 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 27.7 | 22.5 | 21.9 | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 41.4 | 22.1 | 19.5 | ||
| F1 24 (2024) | 47.3 |
排放与能源
噪音排放
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G 的散热系统由两个风扇组成，在正常办公使用时几乎不会启动，因此工作时几乎没有噪音。由于采用了各种风扇配置文件，即使在负载情况下，笔记本电脑也能保持安静。即使在最大负载情况下，风扇的噪音也能达到 43 dB(A)左右，可以承受。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25.2 / 25.2 / 27.7 dB(A) |
| Load |
| / 42.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.2 dB(A) | ||
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU | Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Radeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN | HP Envy 16 h0112nr GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV Radeon 760M, R5 8640U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 7% | -0% | -5% | -11% | 7% | |
| off / environment * | 25.2 | 23 9% | 22.8 10% | 25.2 -0% | 25 1% | 24.95 1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25.2 | 23 9% | 22.9 9% | 25.2 -0% | 26 -3% | 24.95 1% |
| Idle Average * | 25.2 | 23 9% | 22.9 9% | 26.3 -4% | 29 -15% | 24.95 1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 27.7 | 24.67 11% | 30.5 -10% | 26.7 4% | 39 -41% | 25.3 9% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 42.6 | 41.53 3% | 52 -22% | 43 -1% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 42.7 | 42.51 -0% | 51.4 -20% | 45.1 -6% | 45 -5% | 32 25% |
| Load Average * | 31.72 | 41.4 | 31.8 | 45 | 38.54 | |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 51.1 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G 在压力测试中表现出良好的温度管理能力。在满载的情况下，它的机箱并没有过度升温。只有在铰链处，也就是风扇散热的地方，我们测得温度有所升高。压力测试进行了大约 20 分钟后，我们发现了一些轻微的热节流现象。
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.9 °C / 80.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+1.9 °C / 3.4 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.9 °C / 80.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+1.9 °C / 3.4 F).
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M | HP Envy 16 h0112nr Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV AMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760M | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 2% | -12% | -19% | -16% | -0% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 40.5 | 48 -19% | 45.2 -12% | 49 -21% | 48 -19% | 40.1 1% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 45 | 51 -13% | 44 2% | 48.5 -8% | 60 -33% | 42.9 5% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 27.1 | 22 19% | 33.6 -24% | 33.5 -24% | 28 -3% | 26.8 1% |
| Idle Bottom * | 28.8 | 23 20% | 32.6 -13% | 35 -22% | 31 -8% | 31.1 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G 的立体声扬声器具有令人惊讶的强劲音效和良好的低音。不过，高音有时会有所减弱，但可以通过均衡器加以修正。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 8.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
LG Gram Pro 16 的高能效 Lunar Lake 处理器通常能确保低功耗。即使在负载情况下，65 瓦的电源也不会被完全利用。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.108 / 0.509 Watt |
| Idle | 4.15 / 5.4 / 12.4 Watt |
| Load |
/ 60.049 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø56.7 (42.9-60.2)
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.48 (4.43-11.9)
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø48.2 (42.8-58)
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G; Browsing: Ø6.82 (3.91-21)
Power consumption with external monitor
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø42.2 (38.5-60)
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø22.2 (18.2-33.1)
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø48.8 (43.8-58.7)
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø41.7 (38.4-49.9)
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø48.1 (43.5-54.7)
运行时间
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS 配备了 77 Wh 的电池，专为长时间运行而设计。在我们的测试中，该设备的 Wi-Fi 上网时间达到了令人印象深刻的近 20 小时。
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, 77 Wh | Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, 42 Wh | HP Envy 16 h0112nr i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV R5 8640U, Radeon 760M, 54 Wh | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 77 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -65% | -60% | -42% | -75% | -22% | -45% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 1176 | 410 -65% | 472 -60% | 686 -42% | 290 -75% | 918 -22% | 651 ? -45% |
| H.264 | 410 | 864 ? | |||||
| Load | 68 | 94 | 140 | 97.1 ? | |||
| Reader / Idle | 1068 | 1240 ? |
Notebookcheck 总评分
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G 是一款功能强大、移动性极强的笔记本电脑。凭借高效的 Lunar Lake 处理器、集成的英特尔 Arc Graphics 140V 和快速的 1-TB SSD 存储，它可为要求苛刻的任务和日常使用提供稳定的性能。特别值得一提的是，它的电池续航时间长达近 20 小时，屏幕绚丽夺目，机身轻巧但坚固耐用。
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G
- 03/27/2025 v8
Marc Herter
Multimedia - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: Possible alternatives compared
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 83.9%  | LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Intel Core Ultra 7 256V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,795.00 LG gram Pro 16-inch OLED Thi... 2. $1,199.99 LG gram Pro 16-inch 2in1 Thi... 3. $1,999.00 LG Gram Pro 16 Ultra-thin an... List Price: 2050€ | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
2. 77.6%  | Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $473.00 ASUS Vivobook 16 Laptop, 16�... 2. $1,349.00 ASUS Vivobook S 16 Laptop, I... 3. $6.95 2PCS Keyboard Cover for 16" ... | 1.9 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
3. 86.9% v7 (old)  | HP Envy 16 h0112nr Intel Core i7-12700H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $9.35 2 Pack Anti-Glare Screen Pro... 2. $9.39 2 Pack Screen Protector for ... 3. $15.59 YongMai 9H Tempered Glass 16... List Price: 1700 USD | 2.3 kg | 19.8 mm | 16.00" 3840x2400 189 PPI OLED |
4. 81.2%  | LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,795.00 LG gram Pro 16-inch OLED Thi... 2. $1,865.79 LG gram Pro 16-inch OLED 2in... 3. $7.79 Keyboard Cover for 16" LG Gr... List Price: 2000€ | 1.3 kg | 14.4 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED |
5. 81.3%  | Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV AMD Ryzen 5 8640U ⎘ AMD Radeon 760M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $219.89 HOULISE Replacement for Acer... List Price: 1000 EUR | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI OLED |
6. 87% v7 (old)  | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $30.99 48W AC Charger Fit for LG Gr... 2. $1,299.99 LG Gram 17 Ultra Lightweight... 3. $1,199.99 LG gram 17” Lightweight La... | 1.3 kg | 18.1 mm | 17.00" 2560x1600 178 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
