配备 NvidiaGeForce 芯片的 LG Gram Pro 16 超轻笔记本电脑评测--大胆的极简主义
我们已经全面测试过 LG Gram Pro 的可转换功能。不过,作为一款传统的笔记本电脑,LG Gram Pro 的性能可能会逊色不少。除了 英特尔酷睿 7 155H之外,该设备还配备了 英伟达GeForce RTX 3050.我们上一次测试配备 dGPU 的 LG Gram 是在 2022 年。不过,由于其处理器和 GPU 的 TDP 值相对较低、 这款 Gram 17并没有给我们留下深刻印象。看看 LG Gram Pro 2-in-1另一方面,我们最近注意到该制造商已经大幅提高了笔记本电脑的性能。在本次评测中,我们将尝试说明这对我们测试设备的影响程度。这款笔记本内置的 RTX 3050 是近四年前推出的组件。我们偶尔会注意到,配备 128 个 EU 的 Arc iGPU 性能可能会稍高一些。
LG Gram Pro 16 并不是唯一配备 dGPU 的轻薄型笔记本电脑。三星 三星Galaxy Book4 Ultra华硕 VivoBook Pro 16、 联想 Yoga Pro 9和 惠普 Spectre x360 16都有一个。反过来,LG 设备是迄今为止比较领域中最轻的。这是因为它使用了由超轻镁合金制成的外壳,而且笔记本电脑的其他材料也尽可能减少了。让我们来看看这对我们测试设备的性能有什么影响。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
81.2 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.3 kg | 14.4 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
88.7 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
91.7 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 06 / 2024 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 18.3 mm | 16.00" | 3200x2000 | |
90.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 17 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
91.1 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 19.8 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
82.8 % | v8 | 06 / 2024 | LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.4 kg | 12.9 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
86.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 1.4 kg | 17.8 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
请注意:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息 请点击此处.
案例
原则上,LG Gram Pro 16 与 LG Gram Pro 2-in-1 相比并无太大不同。 LG Gram Pro 2 合 1相比并无太大区别。它只是没有 360° 铰链和屏幕前的玻璃面板。除此之外,这两款 16 英寸设备在外观上几乎没有任何区别。只有在仔细观察时,你才会发现其中一款设备的某些边角没有另一款那么锐利。归根结底,这两款产品的设计是一致的。你还可以买到 17 英寸的 LG Gram Pro,但没有 OLED 显示屏。该版本使用的高质量 IPS 面板与 LG Gram 17.
说到稳定性,Gram Pro 16 感觉不像普通的 LG Gram 那样灵活,但也不是完全僵硬。你可以轻微地扭转屏幕和底座,稍微按下底座盖,在扭转设备时,你可能还会听到一些细微的吱吱声。这样做可能不会损坏笔记本电脑,但也不能保证。Gram Pro 16 的铰链止于 160° 左右。在此之前,可以轻松打开显示屏。铰链在任何角度都能稳固地固定屏幕,但遗憾的是,我们无法对显示屏本身做出同样的评价。在室外使用笔记本电脑时,稍有风吹就会暴露出材料的高弹性。屏幕开始晃动。
在对比设备中,LG Gram Pro 16 是最轻的,重约 1.3 千克。此外,这款笔记本电脑非常平整,我们在不同位置测量到的厚度约为 12 - 15 毫米。
这使得制造商选择的电源装置显得格格不入。在亚马逊和我们的抽屉里,我们找到了几种合适的电源装置,它们比 Gram 附带的 90 瓦电源装置要小得多、轻得多。这主要是由于您还必须随身携带一根较粗的电源线。这个组合重达 420 克,而 Rocoren 的同类电源(包括 LG 原装 USB-C 电缆)则轻了 134 克,而且明显更紧凑。对于 LG Gram Pro 这种每一克都很重要的笔记本电脑来说,电源也应该相应地轻一些。
连接性
Pro 版 LG Gram 少了一个读卡器和一个 Kensington 锁插槽,但除此之外,其连接选项与 Gram 系列完全相同。LG Gram Pro 各款机型在端口选择上没有任何区别。
交流
LG Gram Pro 16 内置的英特尔 AX211 负责无线局域网和蓝牙的接收。可以连接 Wi-Fi 6E,但不能连接 Wi-Fi 7。它在 5 GHz 和 6 GHz 网络中的连接速度是足够的,但明显比 LG Gram Pro 2 合 1 慢。 LG Gram Pro 2 合 1.
网络摄像头
LG Gram Pro 内部的全高清网络摄像头必须与设备的平面屏幕相匹配。遗憾的是,这个小摄像头的画质并不理想。我们主要注意到在不同的光线环境下会有轻微的偏绿现象。
维护
要拧下 LG Gram Pro 16,首先要卸下它的四个橡胶脚垫。与许多其他 LG 设备不同,这些脚垫不是粘上去的。下面的四个 PH0 螺钉可以快速取下,使用塑料工具取下底板也不是太难。只有两个 NVMe 固态硬盘可以升级,但许多组件仍然是模块化的。你可以从 LG 获得相应的备件。电池、键盘、屏幕和触摸板更换件以及许多小部件都可以在他们的网站上找到,值得一看。
可持续性
LG Gram Pro 16 包装在一个没有太多塑料的纸箱里。包装盒内没有塑料,但有一些由易于回收的聚丙烯制成的织物。我们尚未从 LG 收到任何有关该产品二氧化碳排放量或使用可回收材料等方面的信息。对于其他许多笔记本电脑,LG 现在都有相应的数据表供大家查看。
保修
LG 笔记本电脑在美国享有 12 个月的标准保修服务。您可以通过制造商网站购买保修扩展计划。
Input devices
键盘
LG Gram Pro 的底座厚度为 9 毫米。这就为高键抬起留下了不小的空间。不过,在我们测试设备的背光键盘上打字的感觉还是不错的。键盘的触感恰到好处,在正常使用过程中也不会凹陷--即使底座本身有点弹性。
触摸板
Gram 16 的触摸板大小约为 13 × 8 厘米。它易于操作。几乎整个表面都能识别点击。使用手指进行的触摸输入可以精确到边边角角。触摸板的手掌识别功能也非常有效,但无法关闭。
显示屏
LG Gram Pro 2-in-1 和 LG Gram Pro 16 均使用相同的 16:10 OLED 面板。该型号包括 120 Hz 刷新率、HDR、2,880 × 1,800 像素和约 420 cd/m² 的亮度。因此,该面板比 Pro 2-in-1 内的面板更亮一些。在上次测试中,面板上蓝色子像素之间的间隙引起了我们的注意。幸好没有玻璃面板的遮挡,这些缝隙就不那么明显了。
|
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 417 cd/m²
Contrast: 70000:1 (Black: 0.006 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.66 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.39
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP ATNA60CL06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx AU Optronics AUOFDA4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 LEN160-3.2K, IPS, 3200x2000, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP ATNA60CL06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G LG Display LP170WQ1-SPF2, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -15% | -4% | -2% | 1% | -1% | -7% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.8 | 74.6 -25% | 95.6 -4% | 98.6 -1% | 99.6 0% | 99.9 0% | 92.2 -8% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99 -1% | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 98.66 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 94.6 | 76.5 -19% | 86.5 -9% | 88.5 -6% | 96.7 2% | 92.7 -2% | 82.98 -12% |
Response Times | 1% | -36% | 45% | 60% | -23% | -127% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 6 ? | 9.06 ? -51% | 12.4 ? -107% | 0.54 ? 91% | 0.78 ? 87% | 14 ? -133% | 22 ? -267% |
Response Time Black / White * | 14 ? | 6.7 ? 52% | 8.9 ? 36% | 0.69 ? 95% | 0.86 ? 94% | 5 ? 64% | 12 ? 14% |
PWM Frequency | 481 | 240 ? -50% | 480 ? 0% | 481 0% | |||
Screen | -666% | -738% | -3% | -17% | -17% | -575% | |
Brightness middle | 420 | 403 -4% | 404.9 -4% | 390 -7% | 385.2 -8% | 402 -4% | 391 -7% |
Brightness | 421 | 394 -6% | 390 -7% | 393 -7% | 387 -8% | 403 -4% | 358 -15% |
Brightness Distribution | 99 | 90 -9% | 91 -8% | 98 -1% | 99 0% | 99 0% | 84 -15% |
Black Level * | 0.006 | 0.34 -5567% | 0.4 -6567% | 0.017 -183% | 0.29 -4733% | ||
Contrast | 70000 | 1185 -98% | 1012 -99% | 23647 -66% | 1348 -98% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.66 | 3.13 -89% | 2.42 -46% | 1.4 16% | 1.73 -4% | 1.67 -1% | 3.52 -112% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.92 | 6.14 -25% | 4.65 5% | 2.7 45% | 3.95 20% | 2.87 42% | 6.06 -23% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.39 | 1.65 51% | 0.93 73% | 1.32 61% | 1.43 58% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 4.5 -246% | 1.1 15% | 2.1 -62% | 2.6 -100% | 1.27 2% | 4.27 -228% |
Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.18 101% | 2.22 99% | 2.27 97% | 2.17 101% | 2.25 98% | 2.3 96% |
CCT | 6609 98% | 6261 104% | 6468 100% | 6431 101% | 6133 106% | 6724 97% | 7203 90% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -227% /
-431% | -259% /
-480% | 13% /
9% | 15% /
7% | -14% /
-15% | -236% /
-389% |
* ... smaller is better
开箱即用,LG Gram Pro 16 的色彩空间覆盖率和色彩准确度都适合专业用途。即便如此,采用相同面板的 LG Gram Pro 2 合 1 显示的数值还是略胜一筹。反过来,它的最大亮度相比之下也略低一些。我们经常发现,OLED 面板的亮度设置会对色彩准确度产生重大影响。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.5 ms rise | |
↘ 3.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.5 ms rise | |
↘ 2.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 481 Hz Amplitude: 41 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 481 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 481 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
外观方面,Gram Pro 16 的表现并不出色。其闪亮的显示屏表面必须面对一些极强的反光。只有在屏幕后面放置一些暗物,才能很好地在户外阅读。
作为 OLED 的典型代表,Gram Pro 16 从较陡的角度观看时几乎不会出现任何色彩变化。只有当视轴几乎平行于屏幕表面时,彩虹效果才会变得明显。
性能
我们的测试设备配备了 英特尔酷睿7 155H和 英伟达GeForce RTX 3050(4 GB GDDR6 内存) 和 32 GB LPDDR5 内存。此外,还预装了两个来自三星的快速 NVMe SSD。其他配置有 8 或 16 GB 内存,配备 英特尔酷睿 5 125H和不带 dGPU 的配置。
测试条件
LG Gram Pro 16 有四种预设风扇和电源控制模式。在大多数基准测试中,我们都将散热模式设置为 "高"。我们只使用 Max 模式进行了游戏基准测试。
在许多不同的测试场景中,我们发现笔记本电脑的性能在任何性能模式下都无法保持稳定。在短暂的提升阶段之后,无论预设的性能模式如何,系统性能都需要 5 到 10 分钟才能稳定在一个水平。
处理器
英特尔 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H是一款功能强大的处理器。它可以同时处理 22 个线程,在低功耗水平下仍能提供良好的性能。不过,大多数竞争对手都将处理器的 TDP 设置得更高,导致我们的测试设备相比之下有些吃亏。归根结底,你购买 LG Gram 并不是因为它的运算能力特别强。
在 Cinbench R15 循环测试中,dGPU 带来的负面影响显而易见。即使在最大通风条件下,处理器也会在运行几次后变得过热,并出现节流现象。LG Gram Pro 2 合 1 显示出更稳定的性能。不过,这款可折叠电脑的等效冷却系统无需为 RTX 3050 散发额外的废热。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 -1! | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G -2! |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9769 - 19007, n=47) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1496 - 1815, n=47) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3798 - 7409, n=45) | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (601 - 696, n=45) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1932 - 2880, n=51) | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=86, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (99.6 - 268, n=47) | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (175 - 381, n=43) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (41739 - 70254, n=45) | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (4795 - 5621, n=45) | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7592 - 22544, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (7732 - 13656, n=50) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=58, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1901 - 2473, n=47) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (10017 - 13556, n=47) | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2342, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1462 - 1824, n=47) | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9.93 - 21.2, n=45) | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=45) | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40905 - 93181, n=45) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=45) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 94181, n=45) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10647, n=45) | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (18236 - 47685, n=45) | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=45) | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=45) | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=45) | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=45) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
系统性能
如果长时间将 LG Gram Pro 16 置于高负载环境下,那么正常的散热模式只能勉强维持笔记本电脑的正常工作。在所有系统性能基准测试中,这款笔记本甚至低于只配备 iGPU 的 LG Gram Pro 2 合 1。这意味着我们的测试设备没有充分发挥 dGPU 的优势。在 "高 "和 "最大 "冷却模式下,Gram Pro 的噪音分别为 45 分贝(A)和 52 分贝(A)。
根据您使用这款超薄笔记本电脑的方式,您可能需要调整其性能模式。在测试过程中,我们注意到最安静的模式足以满足冲浪和办公应用的需求,而 4K 流媒体则会导致一些卡顿。另一方面,LG Gram Pro 16 的最高散热模式对系统性能有很大影响。这使得这款笔记本电脑至少能与同类产品相抗衡。同样值得注意的是:Gram Pro 16 在 PCMark 10 的任何子项目中都没有超过没有 dGPU 的二合一设备。即使在数字内容创建部分,尽管 Gram Pro 16 配备了 RTX 3050,也无法获得更高的分数。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2594, n=87, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=88, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 5480 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 96791, n=45) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=45) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (58692 - 93451, n=45) | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (120.2 - 233, n=45) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
Nvidia 和英特尔的芯片和驱动程序似乎又在慢慢融洽起来。至少在这次测试中,我们没有看到任何过高的 DPC 延迟。不过,Gram Pro 16 并不适合实时音频处理--至少根据 LatencyMon 的测试结果是这样。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
在 LG Gram Pro 16 中,两块来自三星的快速固态硬盘开始工作,不过它们并没有使用 RAID 进行组合。在固态硬盘的连续运行过程中,我们注意到读取速度在测试过程中短暂下降,这可能表明硬盘驱动器过热。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP |
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
撠 GeForce RTX 3050LG Gram Pro 中的 Nvidia RTX 3050 早在 2021 年 5 月就已推出。它不是刷新版本。一个 RTX 4050安装在 惠普 Spectre, Galaxy Book4 Ultra和 联想 Yoga 9这些设备都是最新的。
在测试设备中,RTX 3050 的最大供电功率为 45 瓦。这意味着,CPU 的 10 至 20 瓦功率已被分流。Gram Pro 16 没有 MUX 开关,这意味着 Intel Core Ultra 7 中的 Arc iGPU 始终处于激活状态。就图形性能而言,其较低的 TGP 主要意味着在这方面的期望值明显低于所有对比设备。即便如此,RTX 3050 通常仍比 Arc iGPU 快,但有一个明显的例外。3DMark 的新基准测试 "Steel Nomad "在 Nvidia 图形芯片上的运行情况要差得多。在这项使用了大量着色器和纹理的基准测试中,我们将其表现不佳归咎于显存过低。iGPU 可以更好地管理内存。在使用最大冷却模式时,RTX 3050 在运行《Steel Nomad DX12》时的性能在 200 分到 230 分之间,而英特尔 iGPU 的性能几乎始终稳定在 793 分。
Blender 3.3 的基准测试结果还显示,英特尔芯片和 Nvidia 显卡的性能非常接近。教室场景的计算在 Nvidia 硅卡上要快 60 到 120 秒左右。很难估计这其中有多少是由于更成熟的 OPTIX 和 Cuda API 的功劳。英特尔的 OneAPI 也是从 2020 年开始使用的,但 Cuda 和 OPTIX 已经有 10 多年的历史,因此要成熟得多。因此,Gram Pro 16 中的 RTX 3050 也有其存在的理由。许多应用程序都需要 Nvidia 图形芯片的加速,即使它的 TGP 较低。
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 -1! | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 -1! | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx -1! | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra -1! | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G -1! | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP -1! |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 85027 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 32264 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8280 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 4276 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4131 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 47 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 3940 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
LG Gram Pro 的游戏性能充其量只能算不错。在 45 瓦的功率下,RTX 3050 无法提供最佳帧率。除非使用升频技术,否则目前的游戏似乎不可能以可玩的帧率进行全高清以上的游戏。光线追踪会导致帧率大幅降低。由于只有 16 个光线追踪内核,这一功能无法合理使用--至少在游戏方面。原则上,也可以使用 Arc iGPU 进行游戏。不过,与 RTX 3050 在测试设备内实现的效果相比,这更可能是在激活升频或帧率降低到 20% 至 50% 的情况下实现的。对于那些愿意选择 Gram Pro 2 合 1或不带 dGPU 的 Gram Pro 16 的用户来说,他们别无选择,只能依靠英特尔的 iGPU。
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (10.8 - 136.6, n=34, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average of class Multimedia (7.3 - 94.1, n=48, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP |
F1 24 | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU (91 - 101.1, n=2) | |
Average of class Multimedia (50 - 230, n=7, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Multimedia (38 - 179.8, n=6, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU (38 - 41.3, n=2) | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 59.5, n=5, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.75 - 38.2, n=2, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () |
Alone in the Dark | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
Average of class Multimedia (last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
Average of class Multimedia (last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Cinematic Preset | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
Average of class Multimedia (last 2 years) |
Horizon Forbidden West | |
1920x1080 Low Preset | |
Average of class Multimedia (18.8 - 110.5, n=6, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Multimedia (16.6 - 104.2, n=6, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Multimedia (12.5 - 75.4, n=6, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () |
Ghost of Tsushima | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
Average of class Multimedia (23.7 - 38, n=5, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
Average of class Multimedia (18.5 - 26.3, n=5, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
Average of class Multimedia (14.6 - 19.8, n=4, last 2 years) |
至少在最大冷却模式下,所有游戏都能以恒定的帧率运行,下面的赛博朋克FPS 日志就证实了这一点。您可以看到的短暂周期性下降是由于我们用于测试的酒吧场景中的一个重复过程造成的。
Cyberpunk 2077 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 116.4 | 118.6 | 98.6 | 88.7 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 106.2 | 60.5 | 42 | 29.7 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 88.2 | 77 | 60.1 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 195 | 83.9 | 69 | 60 | |
F1 23 (2023) | 77.5 | 67.9 | 51.4 | 12.3 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 56.9 | 45.4 | 39.2 | 38.5 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 47.3 | 26.3 | 21.5 | ||
Alone in the Dark (2024) | 76.3 | 66.6 | 34.8 | ||
Horizon Forbidden West (2024) | 39.9 | 24.4 | 15 | ||
Ghost of Tsushima (2024) | 38 | 26.3 | 19.8 | ||
F1 24 (2024) | 101.1 | 41.3 | 15.4 | 6.75 |
排放量
噪音排放
如前所述,LG Gram Pro 可以非常安静,也可以发出令人不悦的噪音,我们在 15 厘米的距离内测得的噪音高达 52 分贝(A)。值得庆幸的是,风扇几乎不会产生任何高频啸叫声,这使得它们的音量更容易让人忍受。在普通冷却模式下,风扇的最大噪音仅为 33 分贝(A)。在高制冷模式下,噪音最高可达 45 dB(A)。另一方面,Gram Pro 16 几乎不会完全静音。尽管如此,在 26 dB(A) 的噪音水平下,风扇产生的静音背景噪声几乎感觉不到。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25.2 / 26.3 / 26.7 dB(A) |
Load |
| 31.8 / 45.1 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.2 dB(A) |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 5% | -6% | 2% | 12% | -1% | -15% | |
off / environment * | 25.2 | 22.22 12% | 23.6 6% | 24.2 4% | 23.3 8% | 25.12 -0% | 26 -3% |
Idle Minimum * | 25.2 | 22.22 12% | 23.6 6% | 24.2 4% | 23.6 6% | 25.12 -0% | 28 -11% |
Idle Average * | 26.3 | 22.22 16% | 25.4 3% | 24.2 8% | 23.6 10% | 26.17 -0% | 28 -6% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.7 | 22.22 17% | 25.4 5% | 24.2 9% | 23.6 12% | 26.17 2% | 28.8 -8% |
Load Average * | 31.8 | 42.03 -32% | 44.2 -39% | 37.9 -19% | 29.2 8% | 36.33 -14% | 49.3 -55% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 52 | ||||||
Load Maximum * | 45.1 | 42.1 7% | 52.6 -17% | 41.7 8% | 32.1 29% | 41.61 8% | 49.1 -9% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.1 | 48.9 | 41.7 | 32.1 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
正如前面提到的 LG Gram Pro 2 合 1测试设备上的黑色哑光漆会导致我们的非接触式温度计失灵,并显示出明显较高的温度。因此,我们使用 Flir One Pro 寻找热点,并用 Fluke t3000 FC 使用 K 型温度计进行测量。尽管 Gram Pro 16 配备了 dGPU,但我们发现它的温度略低于我们最近测试的可转换机。总体而言,没有一个热点达到 50 °C。即使在压力测试中,笔记本电脑的温度也保持在可承受的水平。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.5 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.7 °C / 74.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+5.1 °C / 9.1 F).
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -3% | 13% | 24% | 15% | 12% | 8% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 49 | 49.6 -1% | 41 16% | 38.5 21% | 39.6 19% | 34.5 30% | 50.3 -3% |
Maximum Bottom * | 48.5 | 45.8 6% | 40.6 16% | 41.2 15% | 39.2 19% | 55.4 -14% | 52.5 -8% |
Idle Upper Side * | 33.5 | 39.2 -17% | 30.2 10% | 23.5 30% | 29 13% | 28.7 14% | 26.9 20% |
Idle Bottom * | 35 | 35.4 -1% | 31.4 10% | 24.1 31% | 31.6 10% | 28.7 18% | 26.5 24% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
如果你仔细查看上面性能部分的日志,你可能会发现在使用 Prime 95 和 Furmark 进行冷却模式压力测试时,几乎没有记录任何数值。最后,我们的测试设备在大约 11 分钟后屏幕冻结,只有在强制重启后才能再次使用。总之,压力测试表明,如果需要持续保持最高性能,Gram 在头 10 分钟后就会明显力不从心,即使风扇转速最高也是如此。英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 的功耗约为 15 瓦,RTX 3050 的功耗为 40 瓦。
发言人
Gram 16 的音效非常震撼,甚至超级接近Apple MacBook Pro 16 几乎完美的音效。低音、中音和高音的再现都非常出色。这要归功于带有结构膜的立体声扬声器,这种结构膜特别坚硬,因此几乎不会产生任何共振。
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理
耗电量
LG 为 Gram Pro 16 配备了 90 瓦的电源装置。在大多数测量中,至少在短时间内达到了其功率极限。我们测试设备的功耗值没有显示任何异常。我们只希望在闲置模式下降低功耗。
Off / Standby | 0.317 / 0.317 Watt |
Idle | 10.15 / 11.65 / 14.33 Watt |
Load |
67.5 / 91.7 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, IPS, 3200x2000, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 9% | -58% | 16% | -31% | 37% | 29% | -6% | 2% | |
Idle Minimum * | 10.15 | 3.3 67% | 9.9 2% | 4.8 53% | 5.8 43% | 6 41% | 4.1 60% | 7.17 ? 29% | 6.78 ? 33% |
Idle Average * | 11.65 | 7.3 37% | 16.6 -42% | 7.5 36% | 12.3 -6% | 7.5 36% | 9.8 16% | 10.4 ? 11% | 11.3 ? 3% |
Idle Maximum * | 14.33 | 14.24 1% | 29.2 -104% | 7.9 45% | 33.9 -137% | 8.2 43% | 12 16% | 14.8 ? -3% | 13.4 ? 6% |
Load Average * | 67.5 | 91.7 -36% | 100.9 -49% | 79.3 -17% | 83.3 -23% | 45.2 33% | 49.3 27% | 89.7 ? -33% | 71.1 ? -5% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 85.3 | ||||||||
Load Maximum * | 91.7 | 115.8 -26% | 182.2 -99% | 125 -36% | 120.8 -32% | 61.4 33% | 66 28% | 124.8 ? -36% | 117.3 ? -28% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 96.2 | 151.8 | 79.2 | 89.1 | 38.9 | 49.3 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk 2077 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
LG Gram Pro 的电池容量为 90 Wh,能量相对较大。因此,在 WiFi 网上冲浪测试中,我们的测试设备在运行时间方面优于竞争对手。在使用办公应用程序和流媒体时,我们发现笔记本电脑在断开电源时也有很好的续航能力。电池每次可供电长达 11 个小时。
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, 68 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 84 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 77 Wh | LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 90 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -9% | -21% | -4% | -4% | -15% | 27% | -9% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 686 | 624 -9% | 540 -21% | 656 -4% | 660 -4% | 581 -15% | 872 27% | 625 ? -9% |
H.264 | 720 | 1076 | 821 ? | |||||
Load | 78 | 101 | 129 | 97.8 ? |
Pros
Cons
判决
LG Gram 代表着提供最高品质的轻便设备。在计算能力方面,几乎所有 LG Gram 机型都采用了低于平均水平的硬件。反过来,它们通常较低的 TDP 值也确保了出色的运行时间。
配备了 RTX 3050 的 LG Gram Pro 16 在很多方面都是一款可靠的笔记本电脑,完全可以满足最高要求。与 LG Gram Pro 2 合 1一样,它的屏幕、扬声器和输入设备都非常出色。不过,在性能方面,Gram Pro 16 并不能像它的可转换兄弟一样给我们留下深刻印象。将 Arc iGPU 与 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 搭配使用,功率为 45 瓦,这在很多方面都不是一个明智的选择。英特尔的新 iGPU 本身就相当强大,尤其是在与大量快速 DDR 5 内存结合使用时--这里就是这种情况。虽然 RTX 3050 在所有游戏中都能提供更高的帧率,但它也会在一定程度上消耗处理器的功率。如果你决定购买 LG Gram Pro 16,那么你应该花很长时间考虑一下 dGPU 对你的应用范围是否有意义。否则,Gram Pro 可能是一款值得选择的可转换设备或不带 dGPU 的设备。
与 LG Gram Pro 16 最相似的竞争对手也许是三星Galaxy Book4 Ultra。三星的笔记本电脑使用较小的电池,但采用了较新的 RTX 4050。尽管三星的设备在计算能力方面略胜于 Gram,但后者明显更轻巧、更纤薄,而且电池续航时间更长。
特别纤薄,特别轻巧,声音特别好听:LG Gram Pro 16 知道如何给人留下深刻印象。
与 LG 的笔记本电脑一样,计算能力是用重量换来的。这款笔记本电脑的基准测试结果在很大程度上落后于竞争对手。联想 联想 Yoga Pro 9和 HP Spectre x360 16的性能要强得多。但这是否只是纸上谈兵,则是另一回事。在我们看来,Gram Pro 16 不仅仅适合日常使用。
请注意:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息 请点击此处.
价格和供应情况
截至发稿时,配备 dGPU 的 LG Gram Pro 16 可通过制造商网站购买,售价为 2,399.99 美元。.
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
- 07/05/2024 v8
Marc Herter
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.