Notebookcheck Logo

配备 NvidiaGeForce 芯片的 LG Gram Pro 16 超轻笔记本电脑评测--大胆的极简主义

简直不能再苗条了。

LG 的 Gram 笔记本电脑纤薄轻巧。现在,这家制造商又推出了一款名为 LG Gram Pro 的笔记本电脑。它更加纤薄、轻巧,而且拥有更强的动力。
Geforce Meteor Lake Intel Intel Evo Laptop / Notebook Nvidia Arc

我们已经全面测试过 LG Gram Pro 的可转换功能。不过,作为一款传统的笔记本电脑,LG Gram Pro 的性能可能会逊色不少。除了 英特尔酷睿 7 155H之外,该设备还配备了 英伟达GeForce RTX 3050.我们上一次测试配备 dGPU 的 LG Gram 是在 2022 年。不过,由于其处理器和 GPU 的 TDP 值相对较低、 这款 Gram 17并没有给我们留下深刻印象。看看 LG Gram Pro 2-in-1另一方面,我们最近注意到该制造商已经大幅提高了笔记本电脑的性能。在本次评测中,我们将尝试说明这对我们测试设备的影响程度。这款笔记本内置的 RTX 3050 是近四年前推出的组件。我们偶尔会注意到,配备 128 个 EU 的 Arc iGPU 性能可能会稍高一些。

LG Gram Pro 16 并不是唯一配备 dGPU 的轻薄型笔记本电脑。三星 三星Galaxy Book4 Ultra华硕 VivoBook Pro 16、 联想 Yoga Pro 9惠普 Spectre x360 16都有一个。反过来,LG 设备是迄今为止比较领域中最轻的。这是因为它使用了由超轻镁合金制成的外壳,而且笔记本电脑的其他材料也尽可能减少了。让我们来看看这对我们测试设备的性能有什么影响。

LG gram Pro 16Z90SP (gram Pro 16 Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H 16 x 3.8 - 4.8 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 28 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR5
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 212 PPI, ATNA60CL06-0, OLED, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB 
, M.2 PCIe; two devices no Raid, 1750 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5mm
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 14.4 x 357.7 x 251.6
Battery
90 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: FHD Webcam + IR Camera with Webcam & Dual Mic
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.269 kg, Power Supply: 420 g
Price
2000 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
81.2 %v8
07 / 2024
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
1.3 kg14.4 mm16.00"2880x1800
88.7 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
1.9 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
91.7 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
06 / 2024
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg18.3 mm16.00"3200x2000
90.4 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
03 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
1.8 kg17 mm16.00"2880x1800
91.1 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
03 / 2024
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
2 kg19.8 mm16.00"2880x1800
82.8 %v8
06 / 2024
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1.4 kg12.9 mm16.00"2880x1800
86.4 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
1.4 kg17.8 mm17.00"2560x1600

案例

原则上,LG Gram Pro 16 与 LG Gram Pro 2-in-1 相比并无太大不同。 LG Gram Pro 2 合 1相比并无太大区别。它只是没有 360° 铰链和屏幕前的玻璃面板。除此之外,这两款 16 英寸设备在外观上几乎没有任何区别。只有在仔细观察时,你才会发现其中一款设备的某些边角没有另一款那么锐利。归根结底,这两款产品的设计是一致的。你还可以买到 17 英寸的 LG Gram Pro,但没有 OLED 显示屏。该版本使用的高质量 IPS 面板与 LG Gram 17.

说到稳定性,Gram Pro 16 感觉不像普通的 LG Gram 那样灵活,但也不是完全僵硬。你可以轻微地扭转屏幕和底座,稍微按下底座盖,在扭转设备时,你可能还会听到一些细微的吱吱声。这样做可能不会损坏笔记本电脑,但也不能保证。Gram Pro 16 的铰链止于 160° 左右。在此之前,可以轻松打开显示屏。铰链在任何角度都能稳固地固定屏幕,但遗憾的是,我们无法对显示屏本身做出同样的评价。在室外使用笔记本电脑时,稍有风吹就会暴露出材料的高弹性。屏幕开始晃动。

LG Gram Pro 16
LG Gram Pro 16
LG Gram Pro 16
LG Gram Pro 16
LG Gram Pro 16
LG Gram Pro 16
带 LG 电缆的 Rocoren USB-C 电源
带 LG 电缆的 Rocoren USB-C 电源
LG USB-C 电源
LG USB-C 电源

在对比设备中,LG Gram Pro 16 是最轻的,重约 1.3 千克。此外,这款笔记本电脑非常平整,我们在不同位置测量到的厚度约为 12 - 15 毫米。

这使得制造商选择的电源装置显得格格不入。在亚马逊和我们的抽屉里,我们找到了几种合适的电源装置,它们比 Gram 附带的 90 瓦电源装置要小得多、轻得多。这主要是由于您还必须随身携带一根较粗的电源线。这个组合重达 420 克,而 Rocoren 的同类电源(包括 LG 原装 USB-C 电缆)则轻了 134 克,而且明显更紧凑。对于 LG Gram Pro 这种每一克都很重要的笔记本电脑来说,电源也应该相应地轻一些。

尺寸比较

380.2 mm 260.1 mm 17.8 mm 1.4 kg362.72 mm 253.69 mm 18.3 mm 2.1 kg357 mm 253.5 mm 19.9 mm 1.9 kg356.8 mm 245.5 mm 19.8 mm 2 kg357.7 mm 251.6 mm 14.4 mm 1.3 kg355 mm 250 mm 17 mm 1.8 kg357.3 mm 253.8 mm 12.9 mm 1.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性

Pro 版 LG Gram 少了一个读卡器和一个 Kensington 锁插槽,但除此之外,其连接选项与 Gram 系列完全相同。LG Gram Pro 各款机型在端口选择上没有任何区别。

HDMI;2 个 USB-C(Gen3x2、Power Delivery、Display Port 、Thunderbolt 4)
HDMI;2 个 USB-C(Gen3x2、Power Delivery、Display Port 、Thunderbolt 4)
2 x USB-A(3.2 Gen2x1);3.5 毫米插孔
2 x USB-A(3.2 Gen2x1);3.5 毫米插孔

交流

LG Gram Pro 内的英特尔 AX211D2W
LG Gram Pro 内的英特尔 AX211D2W

LG Gram Pro 16 内置的英特尔 AX211 负责无线局域网和蓝牙的接收。可以连接 Wi-Fi 6E,但不能连接 Wi-Fi 7。它在 5 GHz 和 6 GHz 网络中的连接速度是足够的,但明显比 LG Gram Pro 2 合 1 慢。 LG Gram Pro 2 合 1.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1638 (1387min - 1701max) MBit/s +99%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1625 (1476min, 1476.87P1 - 1697max) MBit/s +97%
Average of class Multimedia
  (358 - 1921, n=79, last 2 years)
1363 MBit/s +66%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1350 (297min - 1565max) MBit/s +64%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (64 - 1921, n=242)
1231 MBit/s +50%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1172 (756min - 1362max) MBit/s +42%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
944 (477min - 984max) MBit/s +15%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
823 (328min - 1046max) MBit/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
737 (581min - 806max) MBit/s -10%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1715 (1675min, 1683.7P1 - 1731max) MBit/s +90%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1677 (840min - 1704max) MBit/s +86%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1640 (1599min - 1664max) MBit/s +82%
Average of class Multimedia
  (709 - 1789, n=78, last 2 years)
1451 MBit/s +61%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1429 (1235min - 1517max) MBit/s +59%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=242)
1382 MBit/s +53%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
956 (485min - 1007max) MBit/s +6%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
901 (728min - 937max) MBit/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
805 (713min - 855max) MBit/s -11%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1648 (830min - 1744max) MBit/s +11%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1640 (1548min - 1676max) MBit/s +11%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1480 (828min - 1722max) MBit/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (705 - 1816, n=36, last 2 years)
1411 MBit/s -5%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (385 - 1851, n=214)
1368 MBit/s -8%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1227 (1085min - 1274max) MBit/s -17%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1149 (606min - 1389max) MBit/s -22%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1078 (1020min - 1139max) MBit/s -27%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1763 (880min - 1830max) MBit/s +7%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1686 (1621min - 1705max) MBit/s +2%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1655 (1597min - 1698max) MBit/s
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1620 (1461min - 1643max) MBit/s -2%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (700 - 1857, n=213)
1493 MBit/s -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (700 - 1807, n=36, last 2 years)
1488 MBit/s -10%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1320 (1256min - 1381max) MBit/s -20%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1262 (1155min - 1336max) MBit/s -24%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1481 (828-1722)
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (1597-1698)
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø823 (328-1046)
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø900 (728-937)

网络摄像头

LG Gram Pro 内部的全高清网络摄像头必须与设备的平面屏幕相匹配。遗憾的是,这个小摄像头的画质并不理想。我们主要注意到在不同的光线环境下会有轻微的偏绿现象。

ColorChecker
19 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
ColorChecker LG gram Pro 16Z90SP: 18.39 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 27.38 ∆E

维护

要拧下 LG Gram Pro 16,首先要卸下它的四个橡胶脚垫。与许多其他 LG 设备不同,这些脚垫不是粘上去的。下面的四个 PH0 螺钉可以快速取下,使用塑料工具取下底板也不是太难。只有两个 NVMe 固态硬盘可以升级,但许多组件仍然是模块化的。你可以从 LG 获得相应的备件。电池、键盘、屏幕和触摸板更换件以及许多小部件都可以在他们的网站上找到,值得一看。

可持续性

LG Gram Pro 16 包装在一个没有太多塑料的纸箱里。包装盒内没有塑料,但有一些由易于回收的聚丙烯制成的织物。我们尚未从 LG 收到任何有关该产品二氧化碳排放量或使用可回收材料等方面的信息。对于其他许多笔记本电脑,LG 现在都有相应的数据表供大家查看。

保修

LG 笔记本电脑在美国享有 12 个月的标准保修服务。您可以通过制造商网站购买保修扩展计划。

Input devices

键盘

LG Gram Pro 的底座厚度为 9 毫米。这就为高键抬起留下了不小的空间。不过,在我们测试设备的背光键盘上打字的感觉还是不错的。键盘的触感恰到好处,在正常使用过程中也不会凹陷--即使底座本身有点弹性。

LG Gram Pro 的背光键盘
LG Gram Pro 的背光键盘

触摸板

Gram 16 的触摸板大小约为 13 × 8 厘米。它易于操作。几乎整个表面都能识别点击。使用手指进行的触摸输入可以精确到边边角角。触摸板的手掌识别功能也非常有效,但无法关闭。

显示屏

亚像素矩阵 LG Gram Pro 16
亚像素矩阵 LG Gram Pro 16

LG Gram Pro 2-in-1 和 LG Gram Pro 16 均使用相同的 16:10 OLED 面板。该型号包括 120 Hz 刷新率、HDR、2,880 × 1,800 像素和约 420 cd/m² 的亮度。因此,该面板比 Pro 2-in-1 内的面板更亮一些。在上次测试中,面板上蓝色子像素之间的间隙引起了我们的注意。幸好没有玻璃面板的遮挡,这些缝隙就不那么明显了。

423
cd/m²
422
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
422
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
422
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
ATNA60CL06-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 423 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 421.4 cd/m² Minimum: 3.85 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 417 cd/m²
Contrast: 70000:1 (Black: 0.006 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.66 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.39
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
ATNA60CL06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
AU Optronics AUOFDA4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
LEN160-3.2K, IPS, 3200x2000, 16"
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
ATNA60CL06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
LG Display LP170WQ1-SPF2, IPS, 2560x1600, 17"
Display
-15%
-4%
-2%
1%
-1%
-7%
Display P3 Coverage
99.8
74.6
-25%
95.6
-4%
98.6
-1%
99.6
0%
99.9
0%
92.2
-8%
sRGB Coverage
100
99
-1%
99.9
0%
99.9
0%
100
0%
100
0%
98.66
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
94.6
76.5
-19%
86.5
-9%
88.5
-6%
96.7
2%
92.7
-2%
82.98
-12%
Response Times
1%
-36%
45%
60%
-23%
-127%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
6 ?(3.5, 2.5)
9.06 ?(4.27, 4.79)
-51%
12.4 ?(6.3, 6.1)
-107%
0.54 ?(0.29, 0.25)
91%
0.78 ?(0.44, 0.34)
87%
14 ?(10.5, 3.5)
-133%
22 ?(1, 21)
-267%
Response Time Black / White *
14 ?(10.5, 3.5)
6.7 ?(3.6, 3.1)
52%
8.9 ?(4.8, 4.1)
36%
0.69 ?(0.39, 0.3)
95%
0.86 ?(0.4, 0.46)
94%
5 ?(2.5, 2.5)
64%
12 ?(2, 10)
14%
PWM Frequency
481
240 ?(100)
-50%
480 ?(100)
0%
481
0%
Screen
-666%
-738%
-3%
-17%
-17%
-575%
Brightness middle
420
403
-4%
404.9
-4%
390
-7%
385.2
-8%
402
-4%
391
-7%
Brightness
421
394
-6%
390
-7%
393
-7%
387
-8%
403
-4%
358
-15%
Brightness Distribution
99
90
-9%
91
-8%
98
-1%
99
0%
99
0%
84
-15%
Black Level *
0.006
0.34
-5567%
0.4
-6567%
0.017
-183%
0.29
-4733%
Contrast
70000
1185
-98%
1012
-99%
23647
-66%
1348
-98%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.66
3.13
-89%
2.42
-46%
1.4
16%
1.73
-4%
1.67
-1%
3.52
-112%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.92
6.14
-25%
4.65
5%
2.7
45%
3.95
20%
2.87
42%
6.06
-23%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.39
1.65
51%
0.93
73%
1.32
61%
1.43
58%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.3
4.5
-246%
1.1
15%
2.1
-62%
2.6
-100%
1.27
2%
4.27
-228%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.18 101%
2.22 99%
2.27 97%
2.17 101%
2.25 98%
2.3 96%
CCT
6609 98%
6261 104%
6468 100%
6431 101%
6133 106%
6724 97%
7203 90%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-227% / -431%
-259% / -480%
13% / 9%
15% / 7%
-14% / -15%
-236% / -389%

* ... smaller is better

开箱即用,LG Gram Pro 16 的色彩空间覆盖率和色彩准确度都适合专业用途。即便如此,采用相同面板的 LG Gram Pro 2 合 1 显示的数值还是略胜一筹。反过来,它的最大亮度相比之下也略低一些。我们经常发现,OLED 面板的亮度设置会对色彩准确度产生重大影响。

sRGB 覆盖率 100
sRGB 覆盖率 100
DisplayP3 覆盖率 99.8
DisplayP3 覆盖率 99.8
AdobeRGB 覆盖率 94.6
AdobeRGB 覆盖率 94.6
交付状态下的灰度
交付状态下的灰度
交付状态饱和
交付状态饱和
颜色检查器处于交付状态
颜色检查器处于交付状态

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.5 ms rise
↘ 3.5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.5 ms rise
↘ 2.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 481 Hz
Amplitude: 41 %

The display backlight flickers at 481 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 481 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

亮度 100
亮度 100
亮度 50
亮度 50
亮度 20
亮度 20
亮度 10
亮度 10
亮度 0
亮度 0

外观方面,Gram Pro 16 的表现并不出色。其闪亮的显示屏表面必须面对一些极强的反光。只有在屏幕后面放置一些暗物,才能很好地在户外阅读。

LG Gram Pro 16 户外使用
LG Gram Pro 16 户外使用

作为 OLED 的典型代表,Gram Pro 16 从较陡的角度观看时几乎不会出现任何色彩变化。只有当视轴几乎平行于屏幕表面时,彩虹效果才会变得明显。

视角分析 LG Gram Pro 16
视角分析 LG Gram Pro 16
视角分析 LG Gram Pro 16
视角分析 LG Gram Pro 16

性能

我们的测试设备配备了 英特尔酷睿7 155H英伟达GeForce RTX 3050(4 GB GDDR6 内存) 和 32 GB LPDDR5 内存。此外,还预装了两个来自三星的快速 NVMe SSD。其他配置有 8 或 16 GB 内存,配备 英特尔酷睿 5 125H和不带 dGPU 的配置。

 
 
 

测试条件

LG Gram Pro 16 有四种预设风扇和电源控制模式。在大多数基准测试中,我们都将散热模式设置为 "高"。我们只使用 Max 模式进行了游戏基准测试。

在许多不同的测试场景中,我们发现笔记本电脑的性能在任何性能模式下都无法保持稳定。在短暂的提升阶段之后,无论预设的性能模式如何,系统性能都需要 5 到 10 分钟才能稳定在一个水平。

所有四种性能模式的日志
所有四种性能模式的日志

处理器

英特尔 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H是一款功能强大的处理器。它可以同时处理 22 个线程,在低功耗水平下仍能提供良好的性能。不过,大多数竞争对手都将处理器的 TDP 设置得更高,导致我们的测试设备相比之下有些吃亏。归根结底,你购买 LG Gram 并不是因为它的运算能力特别强。

在 Cinbench R15 循环测试中,dGPU 带来的负面影响显而易见。即使在最大通风条件下,处理器也会在运行几次后变得过热,并出现节流现象。LG Gram Pro 2 合 1 显示出更稳定的性能。不过,这款可折叠电脑的等效冷却系统无需为 RTX 3050 散发额外的废热。

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

01503004506007509001050120013501500165018001950210022502400255027002850Tooltip
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H; Max Cooling: Ø1797 (1605.27-2243.28)
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1568 (1267.75-1932.27)
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2200 (2140.07-2224.08)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2824 (2750.84-2985.74)
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2195 (2134.59-2575.83)
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1705 (1414.83-2302.95)
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H; Normal cooling mode: Ø1595 (1216.25-2200.1)
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H; High cooling mode: Ø1742 (1692.19-2188.66)
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G Intel Core i7-1260P: Ø1242 (1192.82-1489.2)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
94.5 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
84.8 pt
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 -1!
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
83.9 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
83.9 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H
83 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
 
81.4 pt
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
72.1 pt
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
69.4 pt
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G -2!
Intel Core i7-1260P
59.4 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
19236 (18458.9min - 19236max) Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
15698 Points +24%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6936 - 30789, n=103, last 2 years)
15500 Points +22%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
15154 (13865.9min - 15153.6max) Points +19%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (9769 - 19007, n=48)
14932 Points +18%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12708 Points
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12282 Points -3%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H
10053 Points -21%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P
8893 (8268.63min - 8892.76max) Points -30%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P
8075 Points -36%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H
1914 Points +22%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1798 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1789 Points +14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (878 - 2290, n=94, last 2 years)
1769 Points +13%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1496 - 1815, n=48)
1725 Points +10%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1708 Points +9%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1692 Points +8%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P
1611 Points +3%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1569 Points
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7422 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6085 Points +23%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H
5873 Points +19%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (3798 - 7409, n=46)
5794 Points +17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years)
5687 Points +15%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5609 Points +13%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
4947 Points
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
4687 Points -5%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P
3113 Points -37%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H
741 Points +21%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
710 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
693 Points +13%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (601 - 696, n=46)
664 Points +9%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
663 Points +9%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
651 Points +7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years)
651 Points +7%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P
618 Points +1%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
611 Points
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2986 (2750.84min - 2985.74max) Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2576 (2134.59min - 2575.83max) Points +15%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1932 - 2880, n=52)
2446 Points +9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1252 - 4774, n=94, last 2 years)
2445 Points +9%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2303 (1414.83min - 2302.95max) Points +3%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2243 (1605.27min - 2243.28max) Points
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1932 (1267.75min - 1932.27max) Points -14%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H
2224 (2140.07min - 2224.08max) Points -1%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2200 (1216.25min - 2200.1max) Points -2%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2189 (1692.19min - 2188.66max) Points -2%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P
1489 (1192.82min - 1489.2max) Points -34%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H
273 Points +30%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
268 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
259 Points +23%
Average of class Multimedia
  (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years)
258 Points +23%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
255 Points +21%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (99.6 - 268, n=48)
249 Points +19%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
240 Points +14%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P
225 Points +7%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
210 Points
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
99.6 Points -53%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P
360 Seconds * -24%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
291 Seconds *
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
276 Seconds * +5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years)
253 Seconds * +13%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (175 - 381, n=44)
233 Seconds * +20%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
220 Seconds * +24%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H
217 Seconds * +25%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
168 Seconds * +42%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
75329 MIPS +52%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
62513 MIPS +26%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H
62209 MIPS +25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years)
60219 MIPS +21%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
60099 MIPS +21%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (41739 - 70254, n=46)
59045 MIPS +19%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
51695 MIPS +4%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
49667 MIPS
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P
37572 MIPS -24%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H
6101 MIPS +18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years)
5716 MIPS +11%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5540 MIPS +7%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
5488 MIPS +6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (4795 - 5621, n=46)
5345 MIPS +4%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5219 MIPS +1%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5159 MIPS
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5125 MIPS -1%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P
5001 MIPS -3%
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
14122 Points +21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7592 - 25760, n=67, last 2 years)
13814 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12517 Points +7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (7732 - 13656, n=51)
12280 Points +5%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
11962 Points +3%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H
11936 Points +2%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
11646 Points
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10921 Points -6%
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (1534 - 3927, n=63, last 2 years)
2720 Points +28%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H
2598 Points +22%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2506 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2436 Points +14%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1901 - 2473, n=48)
2376 Points +11%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2288 Points +7%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2132 Points
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1901 Points -11%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
13749 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12463 Points +21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years)
12061 Points +17%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12053 Points +17%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (10017 - 13556, n=48)
12022 Points +17%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H
11405 Points +11%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10548 Points +3%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10277 Points
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P
9041 Points -12%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1867 Points +28%
Average of class Multimedia
  (891 - 2555, n=87, last 2 years)
1826 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1824 Points +25%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H
1822 Points +25%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1462 - 1824, n=48)
1752 Points +20%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1738 Points +19%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1731 Points +18%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P
1608 Points +10%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1462 Points
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
22.3 fps +57%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17.1 fps +20%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16.4 fps +15%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (9.93 - 21.2, n=46)
16.4 fps +15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years)
16.4 fps +15%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H
16.3 fps +15%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
14.2 fps
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
11.2 fps -21%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P
9.71 fps -32%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2243 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
210 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
162.7 fps
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4947 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
611 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1569 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
12708 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
99.6 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
80.9 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
80.3 pt
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
79.8 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
79.4 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
 
78 pt
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
65.9 pt
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
65.1 pt
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
42.7 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
18561 KRay/s +152%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
14424 KRay/s +96%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years)
14392 KRay/s +95%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
13917 KRay/s +89%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
13541 KRay/s +84%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (6670 - 18470, n=46)
13107 KRay/s +78%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
10362 KRay/s +40%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
7376 KRay/s
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
4906 KRay/s -33%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
93381 Points +38%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
74809 Points +10%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
72948 Points +7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years)
72601 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
71791 Points +6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (40905 - 93181, n=46)
69549 Points +2%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
67895 Points
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
54824 Points -19%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
22887 Points -66%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
4304 MB/s +34%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years)
3385 MB/s +5%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
3360 MB/s +5%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
3288 MB/s +2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
3251 MB/s +1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1940 - 4436, n=46)
3249 MB/s +1%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
3212 MB/s
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
2552 MB/s -21%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
1619 MB/s -50%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
99616 Points +18%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
95241 Points +13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years)
90675 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
84280 Points 0%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
84273 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (64698 - 94181, n=46)
83603 Points -1%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
81755 Points -3%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
75626 Points -10%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
71060 Points -16%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
11354 Points +85%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
9696 Points +58%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
9622 Points +57%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
9366 Points +53%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years)
9325 Points +52%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (5639 - 10647, n=46)
9130 Points +49%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
8086 Points +32%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
6136 Points
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
5676 Points -7%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
45134 Points +147%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years)
36124 Points +98%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
36086 Points +98%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
35607 Points +95%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
34862 Points +91%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (18236 - 47685, n=46)
33785 Points +85%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
26864 Points +47%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
18236 Points
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
13386 Points -27%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
93045 MB/s +32%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (45713 - 152179, n=46)
78103 MB/s +11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years)
75931 MB/s +8%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
70521 MB/s
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
68741 MB/s -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
68288 MB/s -3%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
67762 MB/s -4%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
54754 MB/s -22%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
35042 MB/s -50%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
1285 MB/s +24%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
1038 MB/s
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
996 MB/s -4%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
976 MB/s -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
968 MB/s -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (557 - 1250, n=46)
962 MB/s -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years)
934 MB/s -10%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
774 MB/s -25%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
596 MB/s -43%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
9210 KRay/s +156%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
7818 KRay/s +117%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years)
7814 KRay/s +117%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
7241 KRay/s +101%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
7087 KRay/s +97%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (3569 - 9802, n=46)
6853 KRay/s +91%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
5498 KRay/s +53%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
3597 KRay/s
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
2738 KRay/s -24%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
53337 MPixel/s +3%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
51992 MPixel/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
50926 MPixel/s -2%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
48837 MPixel/s -6%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
48831 MPixel/s -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (32719 - 54223, n=46)
46590 MPixel/s -10%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
41881 MPixel/s -19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years)
40793 MPixel/s -22%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
39562 MPixel/s -24%

系统性能

使用最大制冷模式的 PCMark 10 结果
使用最大制冷模式的 PCMark 10 结果

如果长时间将 LG Gram Pro 16 置于高负载环境下,那么正常的散热模式只能勉强维持笔记本电脑的正常工作。在所有系统性能基准测试中,这款笔记本甚至低于只配备 iGPU 的 LG Gram Pro 2 合 1。这意味着我们的测试设备没有充分发挥 dGPU 的优势。在 "高 "和 "最大 "冷却模式下,Gram Pro 的噪音分别为 45 分贝(A)和 52 分贝(A)。

根据您使用这款超薄笔记本电脑的方式,您可能需要调整其性能模式。在测试过程中,我们注意到最安静的模式足以满足冲浪和办公应用的需求,而 4K 流媒体则会导致一些卡顿。另一方面,LG Gram Pro 16 的最高散热模式对系统性能有很大影响。这使得这款笔记本电脑至少能与同类产品相抗衡。同样值得注意的是:Gram Pro 16 在 PCMark 10 的任何子项目中都没有超过没有 dGPU 的二合一设备。即使在数字内容创建部分,尽管 Gram Pro 16 配备了 RTX 3050,也无法获得更高的分数。

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
7846 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6973 Points +27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)
6789 Points +24%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6720 Points +23%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
6597 Points +20%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6405 Points +17%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6339 Points +16%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5480 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  ()
5480 Points 0%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
10672 Points +26%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years)
10515 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10446 Points +23%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
10326 Points +22%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
10239 Points +21%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10112 Points +19%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9920 Points +17%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8482 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  ()
8482 Points 0%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
9986 Points +36%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9393 Points +28%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
9272 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9152 Points +25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years)
8919 Points +21%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
8803 Points +20%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
8517 Points +16%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7348 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  ()
7348 Points 0%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
12301 Points +72%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9624 Points +34%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years)
9194 Points +28%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
8752 Points +22%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
8602 Points +20%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
7928 Points +11%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7654 Points +7%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7166 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  ()
7166 Points 0%
CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1811 Points +23%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1752 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1740 Points +18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (978 - 2255, n=90, last 2 years)
1719 Points +17%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1574 Points +7%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1557 Points +6%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1482 Points +1%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1469 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  ()
1469 Points 0%
CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1717 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1659 Points +20%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1657 Points +20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (913 - 2064, n=90, last 2 years)
1628 Points +18%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1506 Points +9%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1496 Points +9%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1415 Points +3%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1378 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  ()
1378 Points 0%
CrossMark / Creativity
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
2037 Points +21%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1970 Points +17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1054 - 2795, n=90, last 2 years)
1932 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1930 Points +15%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1831 Points +9%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1731 Points +3%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1689 Points +1%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1679 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  ()
1679 Points 0%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1493 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1467 Points +23%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1458 Points +23%
Average of class Multimedia
  (869 - 2171, n=90, last 2 years)
1441 Points +21%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1251 Points +5%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1190 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  ()
1190 Points 0%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1167 Points -2%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1153 Points -3%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Average of class Multimedia
  (136.4 - 545, n=87, last 2 years)
319 Points +50%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
293 Points +38%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
286 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
281 Points +32%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
278 Points +31%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
275 Points +29%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
265 Points +24%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
213 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  ()
213 Points 0%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
273 Points +11%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
268 Points +9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (133.2 - 353, n=79, last 2 years)
262 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
258 Points +5%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
255 Points +4%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
249 Points +1%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
246 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  ()
246 Points 0%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
240 Points -2%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
642 ms *
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  ()
642 ms * -0%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
569 ms * +11%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
558 ms * +13%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
537 ms * +16%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
512 ms * +20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (254 - 1016, n=91, last 2 years)
503 ms * +22%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
490 ms * +24%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
416.4 ms * +35%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
5480 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
94222 MB/s +3%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
91070 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
90918 MB/s 0%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
85548 MB/s -6%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
84352 MB/s -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (62397 - 96791, n=46)
83126 MB/s -9%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
70932 MB/s -22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years)
69078 MB/s -24%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
64356 MB/s -29%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
89474 MB/s +14%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
87068 MB/s +11%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
86873 MB/s +11%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
80994 MB/s +3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (60544 - 90647, n=46)
80035 MB/s +2%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
78395 MB/s
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
70801 MB/s -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years)
70185 MB/s -10%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
65825 MB/s -16%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
93451 MB/s +23%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
76930 MB/s +1%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
75922 MB/s 0%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
75906 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
75813 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
73825 MB/s -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (58692 - 93451, n=46)
72600 MB/s -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years)
70291 MB/s -7%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
63259 MB/s -17%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
233 ns *
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (116.2 - 233, n=46)
143.6 ns * +38%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
141.4 ns * +39%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
138.4 ns * +41%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
136.9 ns * +41%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
131.7 ns * +43%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years)
107 ns * +54%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
105.2 ns * +55%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
89.7 ns * +62%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

Nvidia 和英特尔的芯片和驱动程序似乎又在慢慢融洽起来。至少在这次测试中,我们没有看到任何过高的 DPC 延迟。不过,Gram Pro 16 并不适合实时音频处理--至少根据 LatencyMon 的测试结果是这样。

延迟监控
延迟监控
LatencyMon 驱动程序
LatencyMon 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6357.1 μs * -160%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6156.4 μs * -152%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5750.3 μs * -135%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
5325.1 μs * -118%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
2668.9 μs * -9%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2447.2 μs *
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
596.3 μs * +76%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

在 LG Gram Pro 16 中,两块来自三星的快速固态硬盘开始工作,不过它们并没有使用 RAID 进行组合。在固态硬盘的连续运行过程中,我们注意到读取速度在测试过程中短暂下降,这可能表明硬盘驱动器过热。

LG Gram Pro 内的三星 PM9A1
LG Gram Pro 内的三星 PM9A1
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Sequential Read: 5026.81MB/s
Sequential Write: 2368.24MB/s
4K Read: 64.05MB/s
4K Write: 139.13MB/s
4K-64 Read: 726.75MB/s
4K-64 Write: 2906.67MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.062ms
Access Time Write: 0.029ms
Copy ISO: 1565.73MB/s
Copy Program: 507.95MB/s
Copy Game: 680.21MB/s
Score Read: 1293Points
Score Write: 3283Points
Score Total: 5122Points
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
 
93 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
70.7 pt
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
67 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1761 - 4677, n=85)
3764 MB/s +37%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1629 - 4861, n=76, last 2 years)
2979 MB/s +8%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2749 (2718.97min - 2748.53max) MB/s
seq write
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2220 - 4564, n=85)
3578 MB/s +31%
Average of class Multimedia
  (463 - 5711, n=76, last 2 years)
3127 MB/s +15%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2722 (2647.18min - 2721.68max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 read
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6621 (6016.94min - 6621.13max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (3421 - 7100, n=85)
6477 MB/s -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2132 - 7126, n=76, last 2 years)
5465 MB/s -17%
seq q8 t1 write
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4961 (4947.18min - 4960.81max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2216 - 5281, n=85)
4814 MB/s -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (555 - 6898, n=76, last 2 years)
4195 MB/s -15%
4k q1 t1 read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (48.4 - 97.4, n=85)
76.7 MB/s +42%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14.6 - 97.7, n=76, last 2 years)
63.4 MB/s +17%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
54.1 (52.53min - 54.09max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (49.9 - 280, n=85)
188.5 MB/s +86%
Average of class Multimedia
  (69.4 - 378, n=76, last 2 years)
172 MB/s +70%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
101.1 (92.92min - 101.07max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (376 - 4185, n=85)
2579 MB/s +247%
Average of class Multimedia
  (295 - 4881, n=76, last 2 years)
1407 MB/s +89%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
744 (687.95min - 744max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (291 - 3559, n=85)
1957 MB/s +471%
Average of class Multimedia
  (192.1 - 4074, n=76, last 2 years)
1059 MB/s +209%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
343 (332.92min - 343.02max) MB/s
AS SSD
Score Total
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2577 - 9147, n=85)
6855 Points +34%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5122 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (2033 - 9972, n=73, last 2 years)
5101 Points 0%
Score Read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (983 - 3469, n=85)
2417 Points +87%
Average of class Multimedia
  (669 - 3501, n=73, last 2 years)
1646 Points +27%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1293 Points
Score Write
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3283 Points
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (921 - 4043, n=85)
3272 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (656 - 4813, n=73, last 2 years)
2674 Points -19%
Seq Read
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5026.81 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2638 - 5621, n=85)
4891 MB/s -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1718 - 5730, n=73, last 2 years)
4257 MB/s -15%
Seq Write
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1617 - 4526, n=85)
3320 MB/s +40%
Average of class Multimedia
  (414 - 5651, n=73, last 2 years)
2791 MB/s +18%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2368.24 MB/s
4K Read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (45.9 - 89.2, n=85)
72.4 MB/s +13%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
64.05 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (28.7 - 98.5, n=73, last 2 years)
62 MB/s -3%
4K Write
Average of class Multimedia
  (66.5 - 328, n=73, last 2 years)
190.9 MB/s +37%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (118.6 - 246, n=85)
186 MB/s +34%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
139.13 MB/s
4K-64 Read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (421 - 2854, n=85)
1855 MB/s +155%
Average of class Multimedia
  (350 - 2989, n=73, last 2 years)
1158 MB/s +59%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
726.75 MB/s
4K-64 Write
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2906.67 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (367 - 3451, n=85)
2754 MB/s -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (411 - 4265, n=73, last 2 years)
2204 MB/s -24%
Access Time Read
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.062 ms *
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.018 - 0.15, n=73, last 2 years)
0.05499 ms * +11%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.018 - 0.083, n=84)
0.03777 ms * +39%
Access Time Write
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.013 - 0.414, n=73, last 2 years)
0.06101 ms * -110%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.017 - 0.101, n=85)
0.03406 ms * -17%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.029 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036573010951460182521902555292032853650401543804745511054755840620565706935Tooltip
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6074 (3285.54-6606.66)
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx WDC PC SN810 1TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4982 (150.9-6680.63)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7096 (6421.43-7116.69)
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5690 (5289.86-5704.67)
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7171 (6315.36-7275.65)
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7056 (5515.8-7163.24)
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø5209 (3197.84-6569.54)

图形卡

GeForce RTX 3050LG Gram Pro 中的 Nvidia RTX 3050 早在 2021 年 5 月就已推出。它不是刷新版本。一个 RTX 4050安装在 惠普 Spectre, Galaxy Book4 Ultra联想 Yoga 9这些设备都是最新的。

在测试设备中,RTX 3050 的最大供电功率为 45 瓦。这意味着,CPU 的 10 至 20 瓦功率已被分流。Gram Pro 16 没有 MUX 开关,这意味着 Intel Core Ultra 7 中的 Arc iGPU 始终处于激活状态。就图形性能而言,其较低的 TGP 主要意味着在这方面的期望值明显低于所有对比设备。即便如此,RTX 3050 通常仍比 Arc iGPU 快,但有一个明显的例外。3DMark 的新基准测试 "Steel Nomad "在 Nvidia 图形芯片上的运行情况要差得多。在这项使用了大量着色器和纹理的基准测试中,我们将其表现不佳归咎于显存过低。iGPU 可以更好地管理内存。在使用最大冷却模式时,RTX 3050 在运行《Steel Nomad DX12》时的性能在 200 分到 230 分之间,而英特尔 iGPU 的性能几乎始终稳定在 793 分。

使用 RTX 4050 运行《钢铁游牧民
使用 RTX 4050 运行《钢铁游牧民
使用 Arc iGPU 运行《钢铁游牧民
使用 Arc iGPU 运行《钢铁游牧民

Blender 3.3 的基准测试结果还显示,英特尔芯片和 Nvidia 显卡的性能非常接近。教室场景的计算在 Nvidia 硅卡上要快 60 到 120 秒左右。很难估计这其中有多少是由于更成熟的 OPTIX 和 Cuda API 的功劳。英特尔的 OneAPI 也是从 2020 年开始使用的,但 Cuda 和 OPTIX 已经有 10 多年的历史,因此要成熟得多。因此,Gram Pro 16 中的 RTX 3050 也有其存在的理由。许多应用程序都需要 Nvidia 图形芯片的加速,即使它的 TGP 较低。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
88.1 pt
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
70 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
68.5 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
64.8 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
63.4 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
 
61.8 pt
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
49.5 pt
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-1260P
37.8 pt
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP -1!
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
33.2 pt
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
72486 Points +33%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (33426 - 87403, n=18)
65034 Points +19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14679 - 130614, n=38, last 2 years)
56887 Points +4%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
54442 Points
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-1260P
47225 Points -13%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
22862 Points +148%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17908 Points +94%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16735 Points +82%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1835 - 46022, n=81, last 2 years)
14739 Points +60%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
11960 Points +30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (9138 - 14157, n=22)
11708 Points +27%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
9216 Points
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-1260P
8249 Points -10%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7492 Points -19%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
8736 Points +131%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6941 Points +83%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6073 Points +60%
Average of class Multimedia
  (622 - 17620, n=82, last 2 years)
5566 Points +47%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (3281 - 5295, n=23)
4448 Points +17%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3786 Points
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3117 Points -18%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-1260P
1072 Points -72%
GPUScore: Sacred Path - 2560x1440 Official
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
117.1 (33min, 99.7P1 - 167.5max) fps +155%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
112.8 (92.4min, 96.8P1 - 174.6max) fps +146%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
83.2 (65.2min, 69P1 - 125.1max) fps +81%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
25.8 (22min, 22.7P1 - 39.6max) fps -44%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
14.1 (11.7min, 11.8P1 - 21.2max) fps -69%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13 (10.8min, 10.9P1 - 19.4max) fps -72%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
117.1 (33min, 99.7P1 - 167.5max) fps +155%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
112.8 (92.4min, 96.8P1 - 174.6max) fps +146%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
100.1 (82.4min, 85.7P1 - 140.9max) fps +118%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
93.8 (80.6min, 82P1 - 133.9max) fps +104%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
14.1 (11.7min, 11.8P1 - 21.2max) fps -69%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
13 (10.8min, 10.9P1 - 19.4max) fps -72%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
75.8 (57.1min, 59.8P1 - 113max) fps +65%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
35.1 (12.1min, 25.8P1 - 65.1max) fps -24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (39.5 - 117.1, n=7)
64.7 fps +41%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
62.2 (51.2min, 52.7P1 - 83.9max) fps +36%
Average of class Multimedia
  (13 - 149.7, n=164, last 2 years)
61.5 fps +34%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
45.9 (37.7min, 38.8P1 - 63.3max) fps
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
38.7 (23.4min, 26.4P1 - 58.2max) fps -16%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
34 (27.3min, 28.4P1 - 51.7max) fps -26%
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
85027 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
32264 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
8280 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
4276 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
4131 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
47 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score
3940 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
92 Seconds *
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
91 Seconds * +1%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-1260P
87 Seconds * +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (53 - 99, n=12)
71.2 Seconds * +23%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
68 Seconds * +26%
Average of class Multimedia
  (19 - 105, n=46, last 2 years)
41.8 Seconds * +55%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
32 Seconds * +65%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
31 Seconds * +66%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
26 Seconds * +72%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-1260P
147 Seconds * -2%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
144 Seconds *
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
140 Seconds * +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (97 - 152, n=13)
123.5 Seconds * +14%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
107 Seconds * +26%
Average of class Multimedia
  (32 - 181, n=47, last 2 years)
73.2 Seconds * +49%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
56 Seconds * +61%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
54 Seconds * +62%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
49 Seconds * +66%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-1260P
664 Seconds * -29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (388 - 937, n=11)
597 Seconds * -16%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
543 Seconds * -6%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
514 Seconds *
Average of class Multimedia
  (167 - 946, n=87, last 2 years)
424 Seconds * +18%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
397 Seconds * +23%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
384 Seconds * +25%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
380 Seconds * +26%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
289 Seconds * +44%
v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
261 Seconds * -29%
Average of class Multimedia
  (203 - 215, n=3, last 2 years)
209 Seconds * -3%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
203 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  ()
203 Seconds * -0%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

LG Gram Pro 的游戏性能充其量只能算不错。在 45 瓦的功率下,RTX 3050 无法提供最佳帧率。除非使用升频技术,否则目前的游戏似乎不可能以可玩的帧率进行全高清以上的游戏。光线追踪会导致帧率大幅降低。由于只有 16 个光线追踪内核,这一功能无法合理使用--至少在游戏方面。原则上,也可以使用 Arc iGPU 进行游戏。不过,与 RTX 3050 在测试设备内实现的效果相比,这更可能是在激活升频或帧率降低到 20% 至 50% 的情况下实现的。对于那些愿意选择 Gram Pro 2 合 1或不带 dGPU 的 Gram Pro 16 的用户来说,他们别无选择,只能依靠英特尔的 iGPU。

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
98.6 pt
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
77.9 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra -1!
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
77.1 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx -1!
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
72.7 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
63.3 pt
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
50.6 pt
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G -2!
Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
43.9 pt
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
26.9 pt
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
84.2 fps +100%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
68.6 fps +63%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
56.7 fps +35%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
52 fps +24%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.53 - 141.8, n=82, last 2 years)
52 fps +24%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
42 fps
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
28.2 fps -33%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
19.4 fps -54%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
19.2 fps -54%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
150 (87.6min, 113.1P1) fps +150%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
121.3 (49.1min, 95P1) fps +102%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
113 fps +88%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11 - 233, n=81, last 2 years)
89.9 fps +50%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
80.5 (56.9min, 62P1) fps +34%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
60 (43min, 46.4P1) fps
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
48 (32.9min, 34.5P1) fps -20%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
40.7 (5min, 7.28P1) fps -32%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
138.5 (119.5min) fps +56%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
126.8 (108.1min) fps +43%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
116.9 (102.4min) fps +32%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
106.4 (89.8min) fps +20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (26.3 - 179.9, n=83, last 2 years)
96.5 fps +9%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
88.7 (74.7min) fps
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
66.1 (49.7min) fps -25%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
56.8 (30.9min) fps -36%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
97.3 fps +62%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
89.4 fps +49%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
81.5 fps +36%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
69.7 fps +16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (23 - 141.1, n=83, last 2 years)
66.9 fps +11%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
62 fps +3%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
59.4 fps -1%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
60.1 fps
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
29.9 fps -50%
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Medium Preset
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
91.9 fps +102%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
71.4 fps +57%
Average of class Multimedia
  (10.8 - 136.6, n=38, last 2 years)
56.6 fps +25%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
45.4 fps
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
16.3 fps -64%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
67.8 (32.7min) fps +158%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
53.5 (36.3min) fps +103%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
45.7 (38.6min) fps +74%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
43.2 (16.2min) fps +64%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7.3 - 94.1, n=53, last 2 years)
39.4 fps +50%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
26.3 (18.2min) fps
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
14.8 (11.6min) fps -44%
F1 23
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
141.2 (121min, 103P1) fps +108%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
137 (103min, 108P1) fps +102%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.61 - 239, n=27, last 2 years)
102 fps +50%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (63.7 - 88, n=3)
73.2 fps +8%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
67.9 (40min, 41P1) fps
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
52.5 (37min, 42P1) fps -23%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
52.5 (37min, 42P1) fps -23%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
97.5 (85min, 81P1) fps +90%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
93.7 (78min, 78P1) fps +82%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.53 - 209, n=29, last 2 years)
84.5 fps +64%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (48.9 - 64, n=3)
54.8 fps +7%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
51.4 (33min, 34P1) fps
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
35.5 (28min, 27P1) fps -31%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
35.5 (28min, 27P1) fps -31%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia
  (11 - 70.3, n=22, last 2 years)
32.3 fps +163%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
26 (15min, 15P1) fps +111%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
25.7 (10min, 19P1) fps +109%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (11 - 19, n=4)
13.7 fps +11%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
12.3 (6P1) fps
F1 24
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia
  (50 - 230, n=8, last 2 years)
105 fps +4%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
101.1 (82min, 73P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (91 - 101.1, n=2)
96.1 fps -5%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia
  (38 - 179.8, n=7, last 2 years)
80.5 fps +95%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
41.3 (27min, 28P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (38 - 41.3, n=2)
39.7 fps -4%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 59.5, n=6, last 2 years)
26.3 fps +71%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
15.4 (10min, 10P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  ()
15.4 fps 0%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.75 - 38.2, n=3, last 2 years)
23.1 fps +242%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
6.75 (3min, 4P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  ()
6.75 fps 0%
Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
91.9 fps +102%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
71.4 fps +57%
Average of class Multimedia
  (10.8 - 136.6, n=38, last 2 years)
56.6 fps +25%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
45.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (42.1 - 45.4, n=2)
43.8 fps -4%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
16.3 fps -64%
1920x1080 High Preset
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
83.5 fps +113%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
64 fps +63%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.5 - 119.9, n=41, last 2 years)
48.8 fps +24%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
39.2 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (37.1 - 39.2, n=3)
38 fps -3%
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
15.8 (5.4P0.1, 7.9P1) fps -60%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
81.3 fps +111%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
63.1 fps +64%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.1 - 117.7, n=43, last 2 years)
46.1 fps +20%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
38.5 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (35.7 - 38.5, n=3)
37.1 fps -4%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
101.9 (48min) fps +115%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
79.3 (21.3min) fps +68%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
74.2 (61.8min) fps +57%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
67.6 (41min) fps +43%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4.66 - 131.2, n=55, last 2 years)
53.6 fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (47.3 - 52.6, n=3)
49.2 fps +4%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
47.3 (32.1min) fps
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
23.6 (16.6min) fps -50%
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
67.8 (32.7min) fps +158%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
53.5 (36.3min) fps +103%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
45.7 (38.6min) fps +74%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
43.2 (16.2min) fps +64%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7.3 - 94.1, n=53, last 2 years)
39.4 fps +50%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (26.3 - 34.2, n=2)
30.3 fps +15%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
26.3 (18.2min) fps
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
14.8 (11.6min) fps -44%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
58.3 (14.6min) fps +127%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
46 (29.2min) fps +79%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
39.4 (32.4min) fps +53%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
36.9 (27.9min) fps +44%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8.26 - 80.7, n=55, last 2 years)
35.2 fps +37%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
25.7 (15.9min) fps
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
21.5 (9.21min, 15.1P0.1, 17.5P1) fps -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (21.1 - 28.7, n=5)
24.7 fps -4%
Alone in the Dark
1920x1080 Medium Preset
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
76.3 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  ()
76.3 fps 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (last 2 years)
76.3 fps 0%
1920x1080 High Preset
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
66.6 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  ()
66.6 fps 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (last 2 years)
66.6 fps 0%
1920x1080 Cinematic Preset
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
34.8 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  ()
34.8 fps 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (last 2 years)
34.8 fps 0%
Horizon Forbidden West
1920x1080 Low Preset
Average of class Multimedia
  (18.8 - 110.5, n=6, last 2 years)
74.4 fps +86%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
39.9 (19.5P0.1, 22.9P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  ()
39.9 fps 0%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Average of class Multimedia
  (16.6 - 104.2, n=6, last 2 years)
66.7 fps +173%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
24.4 (16.4P0.1, 19.2P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  ()
24.4 fps 0%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Average of class Multimedia
  (12.5 - 75.4, n=6, last 2 years)
49.3 fps +229%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
15 (12.2P0.1, 11.9P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  ()
15 fps 0%
Ghost of Tsushima
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
38 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  ()
38 fps 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (23.7 - 38, n=5, last 2 years)
28.5 fps -25%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
26.3 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  ()
26.3 fps 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (18.5 - 26.3, n=5, last 2 years)
21.2 fps -19%
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
19.8 (11.9P0.1, 12.7P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  ()
19.8 fps 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14.6 - 19.8, n=4, last 2 years)
17.3 fps -13%

至少在最大冷却模式下,所有游戏都能以恒定的帧率运行,下面的赛博朋克FPS 日志就证实了这一点。您可以看到的短暂周期性下降是由于我们用于测试的酒吧场景中的一个重复过程造成的。

Cyberpunk 2077 FPS diagram

05101520Tooltip
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU: Ø21.5 (20-22.5)
lowmed.highultraQHD
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 116.4 118.6 98.6 88.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 106.2 60.5 42 29.7
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 88.2 77 60.1
Strange Brigade (2018) 195 83.9 69 60
F1 23 (2023) 77.5 67.9 51.4 12.3
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 56.9 45.4 39.2 38.5
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 47.3 26.3 21.5
Alone in the Dark (2024) 76.3 66.6 34.8
Horizon Forbidden West (2024) 39.9 24.4 15
Ghost of Tsushima (2024) 38 26.3 19.8
F1 24 (2024) 101.1 41.3 15.4 6.75

排放量

噪音排放

如前所述,LG Gram Pro 可以非常安静,也可以发出令人不悦的噪音,我们在 15 厘米的距离内测得的噪音高达 52 分贝(A)。值得庆幸的是,风扇几乎不会产生任何高频啸叫声,这使得它们的音量更容易让人忍受。在普通冷却模式下,风扇的最大噪音仅为 33 分贝(A)。在高制冷模式下,噪音最高可达 45 dB(A)。另一方面,Gram Pro 16 几乎不会完全静音。尽管如此,在 26 dB(A) 的噪音水平下,风扇产生的静音背景噪声几乎感觉不到。

Noise Level

Idle
25.2 / 26.3 / 26.7 dB(A)
Load
31.8 / 45.1 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 25.2 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.748.246.747.142.343.445.143.82535.237.133.83732.933.234.832.53132.434.33137.836.2352932.74031.932.237.134.333.432.630.330.35028.532.627.432.728.427.32928.46326.424.923.928.12325.524.7308023.324.923.72120.923.723.820.610027.822.422.820.118.419.119.427.712527.421.622.619.820.121.219.427.616024.923.421.419.918.822.118.225.220030.427.626.919.216.819.316.829.225030.126.626.217.313.815.813.829.831533.131.330.717.613.713.312.732.340039.634.834.821.714.716.912.638.950040.334.334.222.316.715.513.840.563037.23332.320.81513.512.437.480034.229.429.618.313.413.112.534.7100035.832.833.421.514.814.512.335.8125039.732.332.719.813.614.112.239.5160042.736.637.222.514.914.213.142.7200041.435.235.721.815.913.512.741.5250039.83333.419.814.413.412.840.2315039.632.433.119.714.713.613.239.9400038.631.131.618.114.313.913.338.7500038.131.431.717.913.91413.438.4630036.930.531171414.113.437.2800033.427.728.2141414.313.434.1100002922.723.413.813.513.613.429.81250027.716.217.713.514.713.21328.91600021.313.615.313.113.613.812.228.8SPL50.944.745.131.826.726.325.251N7.24.64.71.40.70.70.67.2median 35.8median 31.1median 31median 19.7median 14.7median 14.1median 13.2median 35.8Delta5.654.41.81.21.51.35.1hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLG gram Pro 16Z90SP
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Noise
5%
-6%
2%
12%
-1%
-15%
off / environment *
25.2
22.22
12%
23.6
6%
24.2
4%
23.3
8%
25.12
-0%
26
-3%
Idle Minimum *
25.2
22.22
12%
23.6
6%
24.2
4%
23.6
6%
25.12
-0%
28
-11%
Idle Average *
26.3
22.22
16%
25.4
3%
24.2
8%
23.6
10%
26.17
-0%
28
-6%
Idle Maximum *
26.7
22.22
17%
25.4
5%
24.2
9%
23.6
12%
26.17
2%
28.8
-8%
Load Average *
31.8
42.03
-32%
44.2
-39%
37.9
-19%
29.2
8%
36.33
-14%
49.3
-55%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
52
Load Maximum *
45.1
42.1
7%
52.6
-17%
41.7
8%
32.1
29%
41.61
8%
49.1
-9%
Witcher 3 ultra *
42.1
48.9
41.7
32.1

* ... smaller is better

温度

正如前面提到的 LG Gram Pro 2 合 1测试设备上的黑色哑光漆会导致我们的非接触式温度计失灵,并显示出明显较高的温度。因此,我们使用 Flir One Pro 寻找热点,并用 Fluke t3000 FC 使用 K 型温度计进行测量。尽管 Gram Pro 16 配备了 dGPU,但我们发现它的温度略低于我们最近测试的可转换机。总体而言,没有一个热点达到 50 °C。即使在压力测试中,笔记本电脑的温度也保持在可承受的水平。

Max. Load
 45 °C47 °C49 °C 
 33 °C41 °C34 °C 
 22.8 °C22.1 °C23.5 °C 
Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 35.3 °C
35.1 °C48.5 °C34.1 °C
31.6 °C45.2 °C33 °C
22.5 °C27.9 °C25 °C
Maximum: 48.5 °C
Average: 33.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  51 °C | Room Temperature 22.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.5 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.7 °C / 74.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+5.1 °C / 9.1 F).
闲置底部
闲置底部
闲置顶部
闲置顶部
Prime 95 + Furmark 底部
Prime 95 + Furmark 底部
Prime 95 + Furmark 上衣
Prime 95 + Furmark 上衣
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Heat
-3%
13%
24%
15%
12%
8%
Maximum Upper Side *
49
49.6
-1%
41
16%
38.5
21%
39.6
19%
34.5
30%
50.3
-3%
Maximum Bottom *
48.5
45.8
6%
40.6
16%
41.2
15%
39.2
19%
55.4
-14%
52.5
-8%
Idle Upper Side *
33.5
39.2
-17%
30.2
10%
23.5
30%
29
13%
28.7
14%
26.9
20%
Idle Bottom *
35
35.4
-1%
31.4
10%
24.1
31%
31.6
10%
28.7
18%
26.5
24%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

如果你仔细查看上面性能部分的日志,你可能会发现在使用 Prime 95 和 Furmark 进行冷却模式压力测试时,几乎没有记录任何数值。最后,我们的测试设备在大约 11 分钟后屏幕冻结,只有在强制重启后才能再次使用。总之,压力测试表明,如果需要持续保持最高性能,Gram 在头 10 分钟后就会明显力不从心,即使风扇转速最高也是如此。英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 的功耗约为 15 瓦,RTX 3050 的功耗为 40 瓦。

LOGs 压力测试
LOGs 压力测试

发言人

LG Gram Pro 内部的扬声器
LG Gram Pro 内部的扬声器

Gram 16 的音效非常震撼,甚至超级接近Apple MacBook Pro 16 几乎完美的音效。低音、中音和高音的再现都非常出色。这要归功于带有结构膜的立体声扬声器,这种结构膜特别坚硬,因此几乎不会产生任何共振。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2047.445.144.92538.434.8373137.12935.2403630.332.75039.329366346.224.741.68052.523.847.310057.819.452.712563.819.457.316066.918.262.720071.616.865.325064.413.858.831556.612.750.240063.912.658.450070.113.864.463065.912.460.980067.412.561.910007212.366.5125072.512.267.516007513.169.8200067.912.762.5250068.812.862.9315070.213.264.2400068.213.362.5500073.313.467.5630067.813.462.3800069.513.464.81000062.513.457.21250067.81361.71600058.312.253.6SPL82.525.277.1N56.40.640.3median 67.8median 13.2median 62.5Delta3.21.33.726.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLG gram Pro 16Z90SPApple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理

耗电量

LG 为 Gram Pro 16 配备了 90 瓦的电源装置。在大多数测量中,至少在短时间内达到了其功率极限。我们测试设备的功耗值没有显示任何异常。我们只希望在闲置模式下降低功耗。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.317 / 0.317 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 10.15 / 11.65 / 14.33 Watt
Load midlight 67.5 / 91.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, IPS, 3200x2000, 16"
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 17"
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
9%
-58%
16%
-31%
37%
29%
-6%
3%
Idle Minimum *
10.15
3.3
67%
9.9
2%
4.8
53%
5.8
43%
6
41%
4.1
60%
7.17 ?(3 - 13, n=19)
29%
Idle Average *
11.65
7.3
37%
16.6
-42%
7.5
36%
12.3
-6%
7.5
36%
9.8
16%
Idle Maximum *
14.33
14.24
1%
29.2
-104%
7.9
45%
33.9
-137%
8.2
43%
12
16%
Load Average *
67.5
91.7
-36%
100.9
-49%
79.3
-17%
83.3
-23%
45.2
33%
49.3
27%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
85.3
Load Maximum *
91.7
115.8
-26%
182.2
-99%
125
-36%
120.8
-32%
61.4
33%
66
28%
124.8 ?(91.7 - 204, n=19)
-36%
Witcher 3 ultra *
96.2
151.8
79.2
89.1
38.9
49.3

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk 2077 / stress test

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø74.3 (65.9-91.7)
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø12.3 (9.19-25.8)

Power consumption with external monitor

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø70.3 (66.4-91.6)
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø35.4 (25.7-54)
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø49.3 (43.2-78.2)
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø73.9 (69.5-87.9)
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø11.2 (2.23-16.4)

运行时间

LG Gram Pro 的电池容量为 90 Wh,能量相对较大。因此,在 WiFi 网上冲浪测试中,我们的测试设备在运行时间方面优于竞争对手。在使用办公应用程序和流媒体时,我们发现笔记本电脑在断开电源时也有很好的续航能力。电池每次可供电长达 11 个小时。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
11h 26min
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, 68 Wh
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 84 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 77 Wh
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 90 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
-9%
-21%
-4%
-4%
-15%
27%
-7%
WiFi v1.3
686
624
-9%
540
-21%
656
-4%
660
-4%
581
-15%
872
27%
H.264
720
1076
Load
78
101
129

Pros

+ 配备 dGPU 的超轻笔记本电脑
+ 令人印象深刻的画面和清晰的声音
+ 强大的 Boost 性能
+ 纤薄轻巧

Cons

- TDP 和 TGP 长期偏低
- 网络摄像头不是最好的
- 反光显示屏

判决

LG Gram Pro 16 - 测试设备由 LG 德国提供
LG Gram Pro 16 - 测试设备由 LG 德国提供

LG Gram 代表着提供最高品质的轻便设备。在计算能力方面,几乎所有 LG Gram 机型都采用了低于平均水平的硬件。反过来,它们通常较低的 TDP 值也确保了出色的运行时间。

配备了 RTX 3050 的 LG Gram Pro 16 在很多方面都是一款可靠的笔记本电脑,完全可以满足最高要求。与 LG Gram Pro 2 合 1一样,它的屏幕、扬声器和输入设备都非常出色。不过,在性能方面,Gram Pro 16 并不能像它的可转换兄弟一样给我们留下深刻印象。将 Arc iGPU 与 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 搭配使用,功率为 45 瓦,这在很多方面都不是一个明智的选择。英特尔的新 iGPU 本身就相当强大,尤其是在与大量快速 DDR 5 内存结合使用时--这里就是这种情况。虽然 RTX 3050 在所有游戏中都能提供更高的帧率,但它也会在一定程度上消耗处理器的功率。如果你决定购买 LG Gram Pro 16,那么你应该花很长时间考虑一下 dGPU 对你的应用范围是否有意义。否则,Gram Pro 可能是一款值得选择的可转换设备或不带 dGPU 的设备。

与 LG Gram Pro 16 最相似的竞争对手也许是三星Galaxy Book4 Ultra。三星的笔记本电脑使用较小的电池,但采用了较新的 RTX 4050。尽管三星的设备在计算能力方面略胜于 Gram,但后者明显更轻巧、更纤薄,而且电池续航时间更长。

特别纤薄,特别轻巧,声音特别好听:LG Gram Pro 16 知道如何给人留下深刻印象。

与 LG 的笔记本电脑一样,计算能力是用重量换来的。这款笔记本电脑的基准测试结果在很大程度上落后于竞争对手。联想 联想 Yoga Pro 9HP Spectre x360 16的性能要强得多。但这是否只是纸上谈兵,则是另一回事。在我们看来,Gram Pro 16 不仅仅适合日常使用。

请注意:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息 请点击此处.

价格和供应情况

截至发稿时,配备 dGPU 的 LG Gram Pro 16 可通过制造商网站购买,售价为 2,399.99 美元。.

LG gram Pro 16Z90SP - 07/05/2024 v8
Marc Herter

Chassis
84 / 98 → 86%
Keyboard
75%
Pointing Device
87%
Connectivity
66 / 80 → 82%
Weight
72 / 20-74 → 96%
Battery
87 / 95 → 91%
Display
83%
Games Performance
56 / 88 → 64%
Application Performance
73 / 92 → 79%
AI Performance
90%
Temperature
89%
Noise
77 / 95 → 81%
Audio
88%
Camera
38 / 75 → 50%
Average
63%
81%
Multimedia - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
82.5%
Repairability
60%
Software Updates
22.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 35.8%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 配备 NvidiaGeForce 芯片的 LG Gram Pro 16 超轻笔记本电脑评测--大胆的极简主义
Marc Herter, 2024-07- 8 (Update: 2024-07- 8)