诺基亚 3 智能手机简短评测
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL (AVM FritzBox 6490) | |
| Sony Xperia E5 (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| Nokia 3 (Linksys EA8500, 5 GHz) | |
| LG K8 2017 (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz) | |
| Gigaset GS160 (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz) | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL (AVM FritzBox 6490) | |
| Nokia 3 (Linksys EA8500, 5 GHz) | |
| Sony Xperia E5 (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| LG K8 2017 (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz) | |
| Gigaset GS160 (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 481 cd/m²
Contrast: 2186:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 8.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
| Nokia 3 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Gigaset GS160 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | LG K8 2017 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Sony Xperia E5 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -6% | -24% | -24% | 9% | |
| Brightness middle | 481 | 459 -5% | 489 2% | 358 -26% | 538 12% |
| Brightness | 469 | 452 -4% | 479 2% | 351 -25% | 534 14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 84 0% | 95 13% | 93 11% | 96 14% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.42 -91% | 0.55 -150% | 0.49 -123% | 0.33 -50% |
| Contrast | 2186 | 1093 -50% | 889 -59% | 731 -67% | 1630 -25% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.1 | 4.5 44% | 8.3 -2% | 7.1 12% | 5.7 30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 15.4 | 10.6 31% | 14.4 6% | 14.9 3% | 11 29% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.5 | 6.5 24% | 8.7 -2% | 6.5 24% | 4.7 45% |
| Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.22 99% | 2.08 106% | 2.12 104% | 2.51 88% |
| CCT | 9014 72% | 7791 83% | 9034 72% | 8166 80% | 7264 89% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL | |
| Gigaset GS160 | |
| LG K8 2017 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL | |
| Gigaset GS160 | |
| LG K8 2017 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL | |
| LG K8 2017 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| LG K8 2017 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| LG K8 2017 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| LG K8 2017 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL | |
| Gigaset GS160 | |
| LG K8 2017 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL | |
| Gigaset GS160 | |
| LG K8 2017 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL | |
| Gigaset GS160 | |
| LG K8 2017 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL | |
| Gigaset GS160 | |
| LG K8 2017 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL | |
| Gigaset GS160 | |
| LG K8 2017 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL | |
| Gigaset GS160 | |
| LG K8 2017 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| LG K8 2017 | |
| Gigaset GS160 | |
| Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| LG K8 2017 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Gigaset GS160 | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL | |
| Gigaset GS160 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| LG K8 2017 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Gigaset GS160 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Nokia 3 | Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL | Gigaset GS160 | LG K8 2017 | Sony Xperia E5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -18% | -7% | 78% | 43% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 181 | 143 -21% | 200.5 11% | 270.8 50% | 209.7 16% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 34 | 42.4 25% | 46.6 37% | 84.6 149% | 83.1 144% |
| Random Read 4KB | 17.7 | 19.7 11% | 18.5 5% | 41.6 135% | 26.04 47% |
| Random Write 4KB | 5.5 | 6.9 25% | 6.8 24% | 12.5 127% | 9.84 79% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 64.3 | 17.7 -72% | 30.71 -52% | 78.6 22% | 65 1% |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 62.9 | 14.4 -77% | 19.19 -69% | 52.2 -17% | 45.56 -28% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 13 fps | ||
| very low | 28 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 29 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Nokia 3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.11 / 0.2 Watt |
| Idle |  0.67 / 1.35 / 1.39 Watt |
| Load |
3.1 / 4.02 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Nokia 3 2630 mAh | Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL 2600 mAh | Gigaset GS160 2500 mAh | LG K8 2017 2500 mAh | Sony Xperia E5 2300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -23% | -19% | -7% | -49% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.67 | 0.92 -37% | 0.56 16% | 0.65 3% | 1.03 -54% |
| Idle Average * | 1.35 | 1.76 -30% | 1.7 -26% | 1.6 -19% | 2.06 -53% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.39 | 1.85 -33% | 1.75 -26% | 1.62 -17% | 2.12 -53% |
| Load Average * | 3.1 | 3.47 -12% | 4.17 -35% | 2.97 4% | 5.01 -62% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.02 | 4.22 -5% | 5.07 -26% | 4.34 -8% | 5.04 -25% |
* ... smaller is better
| Nokia 3 2630 mAh | Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL 2600 mAh | Gigaset GS160 2500 mAh | LG K8 2017 2500 mAh | Sony Xperia E5 2300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -1% | 4% | 4% | -24% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1258 | 1224 -3% | 1326 5% | ||
| H.264 | 628 | 617 -2% | 702 12% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 552 | 572 4% | 615 11% | 594 8% | 422 -24% |
| Load | 283 | 277 -2% | 244 -14% | 280 -1% |
Pros
Cons
诺基亚 3是一款几乎稳定的入门级设备，这可能足以在这个领域成功地启动市场。同时，该设备也在一些方面让我们感动惊讶，诸如：屏幕亮度，对比度，功耗以及许多可用的LTE频段。
这些都让它在这个类别下脱颖而出，然而，它也存在一些缺陷。考虑到该价位下，有款设备存在于市场中，它有更好的摄像头和性能—— Xperia E5。另外，扬声器音质和GPS的准确度也不佳，当然，这些功能在这个价位不能被期望过多。
明亮而高对比度屏幕，低功耗，时尚外观——诺基亚 3在入门级设备中有它的一席之地。然而，由于该机的拍摄功能的有限性，它在这方面的得分较低。
时尚外观和整体还算不错的测试结果，在入门级门类下，给了诺基亚3 一个不错的开始。现在，我们开始期待测试更大型号的诺基亚机器，毕竟诺基亚需要抓住中端用户的心。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Nokia 3
- 07/28/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
