$440的4K笔记本：Chuwi LapBook Plus评测

Name: Chuwi LapBook Plus
Brand: Chuwi

有什么可能出错的？

它具有1000美元的Ultrabook的外观，但只有100美元的上网本的性能。有一个很好的理由使您在市场上看不到很多配备4K UHD显示屏的Intel Atom笔记本电脑。它们实在很不平衡。

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 09/30/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Laptop / Notebook Chinese Tech Ultrabook

Test device courtesy of Chuwi

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Chuwi LapBook Plus (LapBook Series)

Processor

Intel Atom x7-E3950 4 x 1.6 - 2 GHz, Apollo Lake

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 505, Core: 500 MHz, DDR4, 26.20.100.6890

Memory

8 GB

, 1200 MHz, 7-15-15-34, Dual-Channel

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, BOE NV156QUM-N51, IPS, BOE06F4, glossy: no

Storage

Kimtigo KT256GM28S3, 256 GB

Soundcard

RealTek ALC269 @ Intel Apollo Lake SoC - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机, Card Reader: MicroSD读卡器

Networking

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 15.9 x 362 x 242

Battery

36 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

1.53 kg, Power Supply: 211 g

Price

439 USD

Links

Chuwi homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T Chuwi LapBook Plus Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.9 GHz, Vega 20) DIN A4 ❌

Right: MicroSD reader, 3.5 mm earphones, USB 2.0

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	174 MB/s +650%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)	149.3 MB/s +544%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	36.6 MB/s +58%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)	32.6 MB/s +41%
Chuwi LapBook Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC)	23.2 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)	193.8 MB/s +1119%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	192 MB/s +1108%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	35.6 MB/s +124%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)	34.6 MB/s +118%
Chuwi LapBook Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC)	15.9 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	606 (306^min - 655^max) MBit/s +144%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	575 MBit/s +132%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng Intel Wireless-AC 9560	562 (507^min - 591^max) MBit/s +127%
Chuwi LapBook Plus Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	248 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng Intel Wireless-AC 9560	676 (636^min - 689^max) MBit/s +105%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	525 MBit/s +59%
Chuwi LapBook Plus Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	330 MBit/s
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	294 (161^min - 330^max) MBit/s -11%


335.1 cd/m²	371.4 cd/m²	343.6 cd/m²
327.3 cd/m²	360.2 cd/m²	332.2 cd/m²
305.6 cd/m²	337.9 cd/m²	318.6 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE NV156QUM-N51 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 371.4 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 336.9 cd/m² Minimum: 17.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 360.2 cd/m²
Contrast: 1092:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.13 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.8
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
88.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Chuwi LapBook Plus BOE NV156QUM-N51, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160	HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng BOE080D, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD LQ156D1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160	Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T LP156WFC-SPD1, IPS LED, 15.6", 1920x1080	Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) APPA040, IPS, 15.4", 2880x1800
Display		-0%	17%	-38%	31%
Display P3 Coverage	68.1	67.2 -1%	79.1 16%	38.51 -43%	98.7 45%
sRGB Coverage	88.2	88.1 0%	98.8 12%	57.9 -34%	99.9 13%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	64.5	64.4 0%	79.2 23%	39.79 -38%	86.6 34%
Response Times		-34%	-14%	-2%	4010%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	40 ?(21.2, 18.8)	43 ?(22, 21) -8%	46.4 ?(22.8, 23.6) -16%	38.8 ?(20.8, 18) 3%	43.2 ?(20.4, 22.8) -8%
Response Time Black / White *	25.2 ?(14, 11.2)	29 ?(16, 13) -15%	32 ?(18, 14) -27%	26.8 ?(16, 10.8) -6%	31.2 ?(16.4, 14.8) -24%
PWM Frequency	962 ?(99)	208 ?(90) -78%	980 ?(25) 2%		117000 ?(75, 150) 12062%
Screen		1%	5%	-13%	40%
Brightness middle	360.2	320 -11%	494 37%	262 -27%	520 44%
Brightness	337	293 -13%	457 36%	256 -24%	492 46%
Brightness Distribution	82	86 5%	88 7%	90 10%	88 7%
Black Level *	0.33	0.26 21%	0.34 -3%	0.21 36%	0.39 -18%
Contrast	1092	1231 13%	1453 33%	1248 14%	1333 22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.13	4.5 -9%	5.2 -26%	5.8 -40%	1.2 71%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.15	8.81 -8%	17.5 -115%	14.3 -75%	2.3 72%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	3.8			4.6 -21%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5	4.71 6%	2.7 46%	2.5 50%	1.3 74%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.45 ^90%	2.1 ^105%	1.99 ^111%	2.18 ^101%
CCT	7532 ^86%	7085 ^92%	7038 ^92%	6528 ^100%	6738 ^96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	57.3	58 1%	71.2 24%	36.6 -36%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	87.8	88 0%	98.8 13%	57.6 -34%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-11% / -6%	3% / 4%	-18% / -17%	1360% / 889%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
25.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
25.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21.2 ms rise
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

962 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 962 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 962 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Chuwi LapBook Plus HD Graphics 505, x7-E3950, Kimtigo KT256GM28S3; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø124.4 (124.01-124.67)

Teclast Tbook 16 Power HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Z8750, 64 GB eMMC Flash; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø123 (120.92-124.88)

Chuwi AeroBook 13 inch 2019 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Netac SSD 256GB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø198 (196.89-200.66)

Apple MacBook Air 2018 UHD Graphics 617, i5-8210Y, Apple SSD AP0256; CPU Multi 64Bit; macOS: Ø277 (266.55-285.88)

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 Intel Core i3-8145U	150 Points +266%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel Core m7-6Y75	119 Points +190%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 Intel Core m3-7Y30	108 Points +163%
Lenovo Tablet 10-20L3000KGE Intel Celeron N4100	69 Points +68%
Chuwi AeroBook 13 inch 2019 Intel Core m3-6Y30	66 Points +61%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD A10-8700P	64 Points +56%
Chuwi LapBook Plus Intel Atom x7-E3950	41 Points
Chuwi Hi10 Air Intel Atom x5-Z8350	30 Points -27%
Chuwi HeroBook 14 Intel Atom x5-E8000	27 Points -34%
HP x2 210 G1 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	26 Points -37%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 Intel Core i3-8145U	361 Points +189%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 Intel Core m3-7Y30	258 Points +106%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel Core m7-6Y75	234 Points +87%
Lenovo Tablet 10-20L3000KGE Intel Celeron N4100	208 Points +66%
Chuwi AeroBook 13 inch 2019 Intel Core m3-6Y30	198 Points +58%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD A10-8700P	180 Points +44%
Chuwi LapBook Plus Intel Atom x7-E3950	125 Points
Chuwi Hi10 Air Intel Atom x5-Z8350	97 Points -22%
Chuwi HeroBook 14 Intel Atom x5-E8000	94 Points -25%
HP x2 210 G1 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	93 Points -26%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 Intel Core i3-8145U	1.77 Points +247%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 Intel Core m3-7Y30	1.24 Points +143%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel Core m7-6Y75	1.08 Points +112%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD A10-8700P	0.83 Points +63%
Chuwi LapBook Plus Intel Atom x7-E3950	0.51 Points
Asus Transformer Book T200TA PL Intel Atom Z3775	0.4 Points -22%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 Intel Core i3-8145U	4.01 Points +149%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 Intel Core m3-7Y30	2.85 Points +77%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel Core m7-6Y75	2.62 Points +63%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD A10-8700P	2.3 Points +43%
Chuwi LapBook Plus Intel Atom x7-E3950	1.61 Points
Asus Transformer Book T200TA PL Intel Atom Z3775	1.49 Points -7%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 Intel Core i3-8145U	13074 Points +247%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 Intel Core m3-7Y30	8846 Points +135%
Lenovo Tablet 10-20L3000KGE Intel Celeron N4100	5904 Points +57%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD A10-8700P	4808 Points +28%
Asus Transformer Book T200TA PL Intel Atom Z3775	4014 Points +7%
Chuwi LapBook Plus Intel Atom x7-E3950	3769 Points
Chuwi HeroBook 14 Intel Atom x5-E8000	3219 Points -15%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	2966 Points -21%
HP x2 210 G1 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	2135 Points -43%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 Intel Core i3-8145U	5953 Points +357%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 Intel Core m3-7Y30	4071 Points +212%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD A10-8700P	2192 Points +68%
Lenovo Tablet 10-20L3000KGE Intel Celeron N4100	2013 Points +54%
Chuwi LapBook Plus Intel Atom x7-E3950	1304 Points
Asus Transformer Book T200TA PL Intel Atom Z3775	1144 Points -12%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	951 Points -27%
Chuwi HeroBook 14 Intel Atom x5-E8000	910 Points -30%
HP x2 210 G1 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	855 Points -34%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Chuwi HeroBook 14 Intel Atom x5-E8000	1168 s * -23%
Chuwi LapBook Plus Intel Atom x7-E3950	949 s *
Asus Transformer Book T200TA PL Intel Atom Z3775	762 s * +20%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel Core m7-6Y75	698 s * +26%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD A10-8700P	507 s * +47%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 Intel Core i3-8145U	463.9 s * +51%

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

2669

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

3769

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

1304

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

9.78 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

0.51 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

1.61 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

41 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

16.79 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

125 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

272 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

93 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)	6815 Points +496%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027	3711 Points +224%
Apple MacBook Air 2018 UHD Graphics 617, i5-8210Y, Apple SSD AP0256	2174 Points +90%
Chuwi LapBook Plus HD Graphics 505, x7-E3950, Kimtigo KT256GM28S3	1144 Points
HP x2 210 G2 HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	872 Points -24%
Essentials
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years)	10509 Points +264%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027	6710 Points +132%
Apple MacBook Air 2018 UHD Graphics 617, i5-8210Y, Apple SSD AP0256	4504 Points +56%
Chuwi LapBook Plus HD Graphics 505, x7-E3950, Kimtigo KT256GM28S3	2891 Points
HP x2 210 G2 HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2662 Points -8%
Productivity
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years)	8959 Points +537%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027	6236 Points +343%
Apple MacBook Air 2018 UHD Graphics 617, i5-8210Y, Apple SSD AP0256	3902 Points +177%
Chuwi LapBook Plus HD Graphics 505, x7-E3950, Kimtigo KT256GM28S3	1407 Points
HP x2 210 G2 HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1121 Points -20%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years)	9265 Points +826%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027	3315 Points +231%
Apple MacBook Air 2018 UHD Graphics 617, i5-8210Y, Apple SSD AP0256	1609 Points +61%
Chuwi LapBook Plus HD Graphics 505, x7-E3950, Kimtigo KT256GM28S3	1001 Points
HP x2 210 G2 HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	605 Points -40%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		1371 points
PCMark 10 Score		1144 points
Help

	Chuwi LapBook Plus Kimtigo KT256GM28S3	HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G	HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04	Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027	Chuwi HeroBook 14 SanDisk DF4064
AS SSD		263%	344%	111%	-65%
Seq Read	391.5	1153 195%	2018 415%	504 29%	127.9 -67%
Seq Write	419.4	736 75%	773 84%	202.7 -52%	85.9 -80%
4K Read	7.36	46.51 532%	24.62 235%	27.67 276%	9.33 27%
4K Write	15.16	114.1 653%	92.8 512%	51.1 237%	10.77 -29%
4K-64 Read	139.4	618 343%	845 506%	373.6 168%	27.59 -80%
4K-64 Write	137.7	461.4 235%	957 595%	173 26%	8.6 -94%
Access Time Read *	0.361	0.421 -17%	0.147 59%	0.365 -1%	0.408 -13%
Access Time Write *	0.462	0.233 50%	0.057 88%	0.603 -31%	0.904 -96%
Score Read	186	780 319%	1071 476%	452 143%	50 -73%
Score Write	195	649 233%	1127 478%	244 25%	28 -86%
Score Total	479	1822 280%	2684 460%	921 92%	105 -78%
Copy ISO MB/s	464.9		1652 255%	810 74%	59 -87%
Copy Program MB/s	77.7		328.5 323%	332.5 328%	15.61 -80%
Copy Game MB/s	162		700 332%	557 244%	37.2 -77%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Kimtigo KT256GM28S3

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 547 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 476.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 92.1 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 81.3 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 455.5 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 395.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 13.04 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 58.7 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8550U	4506 Points +489%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	1881 Points +146%
Apple MacBook Air 2018 Intel UHD Graphics 617, i5-8210Y	1572 Points +105%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 Intel UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U	1415 Points +85%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P	1288 Points +68%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 Intel HD Graphics 615, m3-7Y30	1251 Points +64%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30	1186 Points +55%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75	1154 Points +51%
Chuwi LapBook Plus Intel HD Graphics 505, x7-E3950	765 Points
Lenovo Tablet 10-20L3000KGE Intel UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100	608 Points -21%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Z8750	408 Points -47%
Chuwi Hi10 Air Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350	278 Points -64%
Chuwi HeroBook 14 Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), E8000	247 Points -68%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8550U	4126 Points +447%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	1509 Points +100%
Apple MacBook Air 2018 Intel UHD Graphics 617, i5-8210Y	1472 Points +95%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 Intel HD Graphics 615, m3-7Y30	1239 Points +64%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75	1179 Points +56%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 Intel UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U	1032 Points +37%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30	1014 Points +34%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P	861 Points +14%
Chuwi LapBook Plus Intel HD Graphics 505, x7-E3950	754 Points
Lenovo Tablet 10-20L3000KGE Intel UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100	558 Points -26%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Z8750	363 Points -52%
Chuwi HeroBook 14 Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), E8000	319 Points -58%
Chuwi Hi10 Air Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350	318 Points -58%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8550U	18770 Points +370%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	9769 Points +144%
Apple MacBook Air 2018 Intel UHD Graphics 617, i5-8210Y	7231 Points +81%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 Intel UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U	7152 Points +79%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 Intel HD Graphics 615, m3-7Y30	6096 Points +53%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30	6078 Points +52%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75	5769 Points +44%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P	4033 Points +1%
Chuwi LapBook Plus Intel HD Graphics 505, x7-E3950	3997 Points
Lenovo Tablet 10-20L3000KGE Intel UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100	3869 Points -3%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Z8750	1767 Points -56%
Chuwi HeroBook 14 Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), E8000	1594 Points -60%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 Intel HD Graphics 615, m3-7Y30	31512 Points +76%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P	26331 Points +47%
Chuwi LapBook Plus Intel HD Graphics 505, x7-E3950	17895 Points
Lenovo Tablet 10-20L3000KGE Intel UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100	11944 Points -33%

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 06 Standard Score		4884 points
3DMark Vantage P Result		2744 points
3DMark 11 Performance		835 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		23656 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		2880 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		161 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high	ultra
Rocket League (2017)	21.4	15.3

Max. Load

Idle


46.2 °C	34.2 °C	30.4 °C
36.2 °C	32.4 °C	29.2 °C
33.6 °C	30.8 °C	29.8 °C

Maximum: 46.2 °C
Average: 33.6 °C


31 °C	36 °C	51 °C
30 °C	35 °C	38.8 °C
29.6 °C	32 °C	34.4 °C

Maximum: 51 °C
Average: 35.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 38 °C | Room Temperature 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.6 °C / 92.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4.8 °C / -8.7 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Chuwi LapBook Plus audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.34 / 0.5 Watt
Idle	6.6 / 11.3 / 11.7 Watt
Load	21.1 / 20.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Chuwi LapBook Plus x7-E3950, HD Graphics 505, Kimtigo KT256GM28S3, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"	HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng i5-8265U, GeForce MX250, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"	Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"	Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G, IPS, 2736x1834, 12.3"
Power Consumption		-40%	-205%	-51%	-141%	-3%
Idle Minimum *	6.6	4.9 26%	9.48 -44%	3.1 53%	2.1 68%	4.3 35%
Idle Average *	11.3	7.9 30%	16.1 -42%	6.3 44%	6.7 41%	8.7 23%
Idle Maximum *	11.7	10.1 14%	16.9 -44%	8.6 26%	11.4 3%	9.4 20%
Load Average *	21.1	60 -184%	90.8 -330%	56.4 -167%	77.7 -268%	24.5 -16%
Load Maximum *	20.2	38 -88%	134.4 -565%	62.7 -210%	131.5 -551%	36 -78%
Witcher 3 ultra *				45

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		3h 31min

	Chuwi LapBook Plus x7-E3950, HD Graphics 505, 36 Wh	HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng i5-8265U, GeForce MX250, 41 Wh	Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 97 Wh	HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 84 Wh	Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 42 Wh	Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) i7-8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, 83 Wh
Battery Runtime		41%	173%	150%	84%	191%
WiFi v1.3	211	297 41%	576 173%	528 150%	388 84%	614 191%
Reader / Idle		480		1127
Load		79	76	135
Witcher 3 ultra			62			88

Pros

+ 铝合金机身可以很好地隐藏指纹

+ 光滑的外观，特别是在这个价格下

+ 全尺寸NumPad和方向键

+ 舒适的打字体验

+ 高品质4K UHD面板

+ 轻薄

+ 两个M.2 2280插槽

+ 完全安静

+ 大触控板

+ 便宜

Cons

- MicroSD读取器非常慢； MicroSD卡也可能卡住

- 音频质量差；扬声器声音小

- 极慢的系统性能

- 铰链很弱，容易吱吱作响

- 测试单元上的Clickpad损坏

- 不可升级的RAM

- 没有全尺寸的HDMI端口

- 电池续航时间短

- 没有USB C型接口

In review: Chuwi LapBook Plus. Test model provided by Chuwi

尽管看起来很轻薄和性感，但对于简单的打印或电子邮件而言，性能都太差了，无法推荐其他任何功能。即使是最简单的操作（如单击和键入），也都存在明显的延迟，这使得LapBook Plus成为多媒体，流媒体浏览的不佳选择。

值得称赞的是，与其他Ultrabooks相比，键盘实际上是相当不错的，并且在此价格范围内4K UHD显示屏是无与伦比的。不幸的是，这些受人欢迎的品质并没有实际用途，因为它们被今年上市的任何笔记本电脑中最慢的处理器之一所拖累。

被Intel Atom所困的漂亮笔记本电脑。非常慢的处理器拖累了本来可以买到便宜的超极本。使用上一代Core i3笔记本电脑，用户会获得更好的体验，从而获得明显更快和更可靠的性能。

Chuwi LapBook Plus - 07/05/2019 v6 ^(old)
Allen Ngo

Chassis

70 / 98 → 71%

Keyboard

92%

Pointing Device

56%

Connectivity

41 / 81 → 51%

Weight

69 / 20-67 → 100%

Battery

72%

Display

87%

Games Performance

51 / 85 → 60%

Application Performance

45 / 92 → 49%

Temperature

87%

Noise

100 / 95 → 100%

Audio

30%

Camera

21 / 85 → 25%

Average

63%

72%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5252 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 472283 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > $440的4K笔记本：Chuwi LapBook Plus评测

Allen Ngo, 2019-09-30 (Update: 2019-09-30)

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Chuwi LapBook Plus audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

Pros

Cons

More articles related to this device

Price comparison