一加 5 智能手机简短评测
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Linksys EA8500) | |
| OnePlus 5 (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Honor 8 Pro (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| OnePlus 5 (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Linksys EA8500) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Honor 8 Pro (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 426 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.25
| OnePlus 5 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | OnePlus 3T Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy S8 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8" | Apple iPhone 7 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Honor 8 Pro IPS, 2560x1440, 5.7" | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -155% | -20% | 21% | -45% | 14% | |
| Brightness middle | 426 | 421 -1% | 566 33% | 557 31% | 541 27% | 554 30% |
| Brightness | 431 | 430 0% | 564 31% | 553 28% | 514 19% | 552 28% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 84 -10% | 94 1% | 97 4% | 91 -2% | 96 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.3 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 7.1 -344% | 2.7 -69% | 1.4 12% | 3.2 -100% | 1.59 1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.1 | 15.3 -273% | 5.4 -32% | 3.1 24% | 7.2 -76% | 2.56 38% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 6.8 -300% | 3.1 -82% | 1.3 24% | 4 -135% | 2.01 -18% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.23 99% | 2.15 102% | 2.21 100% | 2.27 97% | 2.01 109% |
| CCT | 6329 103% | 7866 83% | 6335 103% | 6667 97% | 7120 91% | 6321 103% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 81.57 | 63.1 | 82.12 | |||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.87 | 99.83 | 99.98 | |||
| Contrast | 1591 | 1803 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 250 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Honor 8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| HTC U11 | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Honor 8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Honor 8 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Honor 8 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| HTC U11 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Honor 8 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| HTC U11 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Honor 8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| HTC U11 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Honor 8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| HTC U11 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Honor 8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| HTC U11 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Honor 8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| HTC U11 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Honor 8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| HTC U11 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Honor 8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| HTC U11 | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Honor 8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| HTC U11 | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Honor 8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Basemark X 1.1 | |
| Medium Quality (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| HTC U11 | |
| High Quality (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| HTC U11 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Honor 8 Pro | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Honor 8 Pro | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Honor 8 Pro | |
| HTC U11 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| HTC U11 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Honor 8 Pro | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
* ... smaller is better
| OnePlus 5 | OnePlus 3T | Samsung Galaxy S8 | Honor 8 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | Sony Xperia XZ Premium | HTC U11 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 53% | -7% | 174% | -30% | -18% | 70% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 748 | 436.4 -42% | 793 6% | 738 -1% | 487.3 -35% | 687 -8% | 717 -4% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 201.5 | 165.3 -18% | 193.2 -4% | 187.1 -7% | 145.1 -28% | 194 -4% | 206.4 2% |
| Random Read 4KB | 141 | 123.6 -12% | 127.2 -10% | 166.4 18% | 86.7 -39% | 74.1 -47% | 91.4 -35% |
| Random Write 4KB | 19.3 | 74.4 285% | 15.25 -21% | 151.6 685% | 15.79 -18% | 17.2 -11% | 80 315% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 63.9 | 54.2 | 76.4 | 36.79 | 68.8 | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 53.5 | 32.16 | 50.4 | 33.31 | 46.25 |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 60 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
OnePlus 5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P10 Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.03 / 0.28 Watt |
| Idle |  0.73 / 1.44 / 1.5 Watt |
| Load |
6.91 / 8.51 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| OnePlus 5 3300 mAh | OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh | Honor 8 Pro 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -11% | 24% | -13% | -33% | 14% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.73 | 0.61 16% | 0.78 -7% | 0.77 -5% | 0.98 -34% | 0.63 14% |
| Idle Average * | 1.44 | 1.77 -23% | 1.1 24% | 2.04 -42% | 2.27 -58% | 1.1 24% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.5 | 1.81 -21% | 1.16 23% | 2.24 -49% | 2.36 -57% | 1.56 -4% |
| Load Average * | 6.91 | 6.67 3% | 4.15 40% | 4.69 32% | 6.58 5% | 5.95 14% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.51 | 10.98 -29% | 5.12 40% | 8.66 -2% | 10.12 -19% | 6.7 21% |
* ... smaller is better
| OnePlus 5 3300 mAh | OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh | Honor 8 Pro 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 8% | 20% | 14% | -5% | 39% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1534 | 1423 -7% | 1667 9% | 1835 20% | 1378 -10% | 1663 8% |
| H.264 | 623 | 810 30% | 771 24% | 813 30% | 675 8% | 914 47% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 518 | 494 -5% | 719 39% | 587 13% | 573 11% | 732 41% |
| Load | 247 | 282 14% | 264 7% | 225 -9% | 181 -27% | 392 59% |
Pros
Cons
在对一加 5进行评测后，我们发现了许多值得被讨论的问题。让我们开始吧：
一加 5是“旗舰机杀手”吗？这其实取决于你对旗舰机的期待。该设备的确能跟上更为昂贵的机器的性能，但是，一加 5在自身性能上的提升却显得不足。该设备拥有许多功能，但是它不支持无线充电、快速USB接口以及更高分辨率的屏幕。同时，摄像头也没能跟上高端智能机的水准。
老用户是否有必要换新机？ 如果你已经拥有 一加 2 或者更老版本设备，换新机，你的确能获得更好性能、且更新后的系统以及更薄的机身。一加 3 or 3T 则情况有所不同。鉴于没有多少变化，我们认为：换新机不是很值得。
一加 5依然物美价廉吗？ 是的，一加 5以相对低的价格提供了较高的性能能。但是，它现在的价格却有了更多的竞争对手，比如说: 荣耀 8 Pro ，或者一些去年的机型，例如： 三星 Galaxy S7 Edge。价格299美元的 一加 1 无疑是最便宜的智能手机，而一加 5，其价格在530美元，也算不错，但是不是很有竞争力。
一加5给我们什么样的整体印象呢？第一年的兴奋已经明显地消失了。其中一个原因是错误安装的屏幕导致了果冻效应，同时存在这紧急呼叫的错误。在新的溢价下，这些问题可能不会那么容易被接受。同时，制造商通常对于任何检测到的缺陷都会做出快速的示范性回应：对于紧急呼叫的错误，他们都会在几天之内提供更新。他们至少也回应了我们关于难以理解基准数据的评论，并且开放交流。撇开所有问题：一加 5在性价比方面几乎没有竞争对手。不变的Android系统、创新的插件、众多的配件、具有特殊电影风格的色彩空间的屏幕和双SIM卡更是其独特的卖点。
一加 5是拥有旗舰机质量的价格相对便宜的智能手机。虽然对照相质量的提升很小，但是在其他方面却做的不错：性能，屏幕，外壳和通话质量。
一加 5并不完美，但价格不错，而且仍然是非常好的旗舰机。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
OnePlus 5
- 07/25/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
