Notebookcheck Logo

一加 5 智能手机简短评测

计算的艺术家。一加 5 是一台质优价廉的智能手机——虽然没有原本那么便宜,但运算速度提升了。这台带双摄像头、AMOLED 屏幕,以及轻薄机身的手机能否保持在高端市场的一席之地?在我们的测评中寻找答案吧。
更新:新固件,让4k摄像更具稳定性。
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen
OnePlus 5 (5 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) 8 x 2.45 GHz, Kryo 280
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
Display
5.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, Capacitive, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 52.67 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: fingerpring, hall, acceleration, gyroscope, proximity, RGB ambient light, compass, Sensor Hub
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1700/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B29/​B30/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.25 x 154.2 x 74.1
Battery
12.5 Wh, 3300 mAh Lithium-Ion, Dash Charge
Operating System
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 20 MPix f/2.6, 36mm, phase detection auto focus + 16 MP, f/1.7, 24mm, EIS (gyro), 1.6x optial zoom, dual LED flash
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, 20mm, EIS (gyro), 1.0 µm pixel size
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker on bottom edge, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, QuickCharge, USB cable, SIM tool, OnePlus Community, 24 Months Warranty, SAR values: 1.240W/kg (head), 0.850W/kg (body); bandwidth (download/upload): 600Mbps/​150Mbps (LTE), fanless
Weight
153 g, Power Supply: 78 g
Price
499 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

OnePlus 5
OnePlus 5
OnePlus 5
OnePlus 5
OnePlus 5
OnePlus 5
OnePlus 5
OnePlus 5

Size Comparison

158.2 mm 77.9 mm 7.3 mm 188 g157 mm 77.5 mm 6.97 mm 184 g154.2 mm 74.1 mm 7.25 mm 153 g152.7 mm 74.7 mm 7.35 mm 158 g150.9 mm 72.6 mm 7.7 mm 157 g148.9 mm 68.1 mm 8 mm 155 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500)
651 MBit/s +21%
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
539 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
335 MBit/s -38%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
313 MBit/s -42%
Honor 8 Pro
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
233 MBit/s -57%
iperf3 receive AX12
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
371 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500)
329 MBit/s -11%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
281 MBit/s -24%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
257 MBit/s -31%
Honor 8 Pro
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
236 MBit/s -36%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - junction
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - junction
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - bridge
GPS OnePlus 5 - overview
GPS OnePlus 5 - overview
GPS OnePlus 5 - junction
GPS OnePlus 5 - junction
GPS OnePlus 5 - bridge
GPS OnePlus 5 - bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
420
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
451
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 451 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 431.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.08 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 426 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.25
OnePlus 5
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"
OnePlus 3T
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Samsung Galaxy S8
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8"
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Honor 8 Pro
IPS, 2560x1440, 5.7"
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"
Screen
-155%
-20%
21%
-45%
14%
Brightness middle
426
421
-1%
566
33%
557
31%
541
27%
554
30%
Brightness
431
430
0%
564
31%
553
28%
514
19%
552
28%
Brightness Distribution
93
84
-10%
94
1%
97
4%
91
-2%
96
3%
Black Level *
0.35
0.3
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.6
7.1
-344%
2.7
-69%
1.4
12%
3.2
-100%
1.59
1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.1
15.3
-273%
5.4
-32%
3.1
24%
7.2
-76%
2.56
38%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
6.8
-300%
3.1
-82%
1.3
24%
4
-135%
2.01
-18%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.23 99%
2.15 102%
2.21 100%
2.27 97%
2.01 109%
CCT
6329 103%
7866 83%
6335 103%
6667 97%
7120 91%
6321 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
81.57
63.1
82.12
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.87
99.83
99.98
Contrast
1591
1803

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
177156 Points
OnePlus 3T
159866 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S8
171884 Points -3%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
165399 Points -7%
Honor 8 Pro
146044 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
128749 Points -27%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
173403 Points -2%
HTC U11
175032 Points -1%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
7826 Points
OnePlus 3T
5664 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6035 Points -23%
Honor 8 Pro
7356 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4660 Points -40%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
7695 Points -2%
HTC U11
8295 Points +6%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
6579 Points
Samsung Galaxy S8
5370 Points -18%
Honor 8 Pro
6134 Points -7%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
6433 Points -2%
HTC U11
6828 Points +4%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
3790 Points
OnePlus 3T
2218 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3277 Points -14%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3097 Points -18%
Honor 8 Pro
2985 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2074 Points -45%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3506 Points -7%
HTC U11
3034 Points -20%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
5902 Points
OnePlus 3T
3130 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy S8
5386 Points -9%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6582 Points +12%
Honor 8 Pro
4029 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4080 Points -31%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
5857 Points -1%
HTC U11
5570 Points -6%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
4423 Points
OnePlus 3T
1954 Points -56%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3039 Points -31%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1319 Points -70%
Honor 8 Pro
4277 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2072 Points -53%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3444 Points -22%
HTC U11
2085 Points -53%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
6144 Points
OnePlus 3T
4444 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6096 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6875 Points +12%
Honor 8 Pro
4070 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2203 Points -64%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
6045 Points -2%
HTC U11
5976 Points -3%
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
1287 Points
OnePlus 3T
891 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1156 Points -10%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1542 Points +20%
Honor 8 Pro
1131 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
994 Points -23%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1239 Points -4%
HTC U11
1221 Points -5%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
1973 Points
Samsung Galaxy S8
1997 Points +1%
Honor 8 Pro
1853 Points -6%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1904 Points -3%
HTC U11
1906 Points -3%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
6799 Points
Samsung Galaxy S8
6711 Points -1%
Honor 8 Pro
6245 Points -8%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
6491 Points -5%
HTC U11
6443 Points -5%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
8005 Points
Samsung Galaxy S8
8490 Points +6%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
7881 Points -2%
HTC U11
8281 Points +3%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
40229 Points
OnePlus 3T
30810 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy S8
31532 Points -22%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
37746 Points -6%
Honor 8 Pro
25766 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28671 Points -29%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
32302 Points -20%
HTC U11
40014 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
58001 Points
OnePlus 3T
34494 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy S8
36347 Points -37%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
63386 Points +9%
Honor 8 Pro
32243 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
33031 Points -43%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
52358 Points -10%
HTC U11
55725 Points -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
19411 Points
OnePlus 3T
22426 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S8
21543 Points +11%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
15626 Points -19%
Honor 8 Pro
15129 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
19610 Points +1%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
13800 Points -29%
HTC U11
20140 Points +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
4219 Points
OnePlus 3T
2577 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy S8
4015 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3034 Points -28%
Honor 8 Pro
1865 Points -56%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2710 (2421min) Points -36%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3407 Points -19%
HTC U11
4744 Points +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
4765 Points
OnePlus 3T
3310 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S8
4923 Points +3%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
4235 Points -11%
Honor 8 Pro
1856 Points -61%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3015 (2895min) Points -37%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
5107 Points +7%
HTC U11
5877 Points +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
3012 Points
OnePlus 3T
1452 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2440 Points -19%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1522 Points -49%
Honor 8 Pro
1896 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2002 (1539min) Points -34%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1574 Points -48%
HTC U11
2832 Points -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
3566 Points
OnePlus 3T
2221 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3194 Points -10%
Honor 8 Pro
1832 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2204 (1923min) Points -38%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
2895 Points -19%
HTC U11
3590 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
3757 Points
OnePlus 3T
2418 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3472 Points -8%
Honor 8 Pro
1746 Points -54%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2229 (2043min) Points -41%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3723 Points -1%
HTC U11
3883 Points +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
3026 Points
OnePlus 3T
1728 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2494 Points -18%
Honor 8 Pro
2216 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2121 (1594min) Points -30%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1628 Points -46%
HTC U11
2841 Points -6%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
60 fps
OnePlus 3T
59 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
57.7 fps -4%
Honor 8 Pro
59 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
51 fps -15%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
60 fps 0%
HTC U11
58 fps -3%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
115 fps
OnePlus 3T
91 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy S8
121 fps +5%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
92 fps -20%
Honor 8 Pro
43 fps -63%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
81 fps -30%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
109 fps -5%
HTC U11
91 fps -21%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
56 fps
OnePlus 3T
45 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy S8
41 fps -27%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
55.2 fps -1%
Honor 8 Pro
20 fps -64%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
27 fps -52%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
46 fps -18%
HTC U11
29 fps -48%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
61 fps
OnePlus 3T
46 fps -25%
Samsung Galaxy S8
62 fps +2%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
58.7 fps -4%
Honor 8 Pro
29 fps -52%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
38 fps -38%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
47 fps -23%
HTC U11
51 fps -16%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
41 fps
OnePlus 3T
32 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy S8
23 fps -44%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.5 fps +1%
Honor 8 Pro
13 fps -68%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps -63%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
37 fps -10%
HTC U11
15 fps -63%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
42 fps
OnePlus 3T
32 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy S8
24 fps -43%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.3 fps -2%
Honor 8 Pro
21 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28 fps -33%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
35 fps -17%
HTC U11
33 fps -21%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
25 fps
OnePlus 3T
20 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy S8
13 fps -48%
Honor 8 Pro
11 fps -56%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
7.9 fps -68%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
25 fps 0%
HTC U11
13 fps -48%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
25 fps
OnePlus 3T
20 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy S8
25 fps 0%
Honor 8 Pro
15 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps -40%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
23 fps -8%
HTC U11
24 fps -4%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
30.64 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13.31 fps
HTC U11
36.58 fps
Basemark X 1.1
Medium Quality (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
43852 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
41091 Points
HTC U11
44696 Points
High Quality (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
42183 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
32273 Points
HTC U11
38752 Points
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
1276 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1177 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
733 Points
HTC U11
812 Points
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
59.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
60 fps
HTC U11
60 fps

Legend

 
OnePlus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 7 Plus Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
 
Honor 8 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
HTC U11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
168.1 Points +135%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
75.1 Points +5%
OnePlus 5
71.6 Points
HTC U11
69.5 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8
65.8 Points -8%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
61.5 Points -14%
Honor 8 Pro
58.1 Points -19%
OnePlus 3T
54.5 Points -24%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
26053 Points +118%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13191 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S8
12941 Points +8%
OnePlus 5
11945 Points
HTC U11
11781 Points -1%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
10672 Points -11%
Honor 8 Pro
10016 Points -16%
OnePlus 3T
9798 Points -18%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3199 ms * -22%
Honor 8 Pro
3157 ms * -20%
HTC U11
2760 ms * -5%
OnePlus 3T
2719 ms * -4%
OnePlus 5
2622 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2564 ms * +2%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1887 ms * +28%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1103 ms * +58%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
204 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy S8
194 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
163 Points +1%
HTC U11
162 Points +1%
OnePlus 5
161 Points
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
149 Points -7%
Honor 8 Pro
141 Points -12%
OnePlus 3T
135 Points -16%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus 5OnePlus 3TSamsung Galaxy S8Honor 8 ProSamsung Galaxy S7 EdgeSony Xperia XZ PremiumHTC U11
AndroBench 3-5
53%
-7%
174%
-30%
-18%
70%
Sequential Read 256KB
748
436.4
-42%
793
6%
738
-1%
487.3
-35%
687
-8%
717
-4%
Sequential Write 256KB
201.5
165.3
-18%
193.2
-4%
187.1
-7%
145.1
-28%
194
-4%
206.4
2%
Random Read 4KB
141
123.6
-12%
127.2
-10%
166.4
18%
86.7
-39%
74.1
-47%
91.4
-35%
Random Write 4KB
19.3
74.4
285%
15.25
-21%
151.6
685%
15.79
-18%
17.2
-11%
80
315%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
63.9
54.2
76.4
36.79
68.8
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
53.5
32.16
50.4
33.31
46.25
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high60 fps
Max. Load
 37.6 °C37.3 °C33.2 °C 
 37.6 °C37.5 °C33.1 °C 
 36.9 °C36.7 °C33.1 °C 
Maximum: 37.6 °C
Average: 35.9 °C
32.5 °C34.1 °C35.1 °C
32.8 °C34 °C35.6 °C
32.4 °C34.5 °C35.8 °C
Maximum: 35.8 °C
Average: 34.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  31.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.629.82525.433.53125.327.54032.925.35033.634.96331.627.48028.427.21002727.312520.828.11602241.120021.347.925020.852.431521.258.740019.462.550019.565.463017.76880017.969.7100017.873.5125017.376.5160017.475.4200016.778.7250017.278.7315018.279.9400017.980.5500017.673.5630017.774.3800017.873.81000017.975.91250018.170.81600018.253.1SPL3087.8N1.374.1median 17.9median 73.5Delta1.49.931.635.225.433.125.329.932.92533.629.231.631.228.426.9272620.833.92243.521.349.920.854.821.257.519.462.319.566.417.767.317.96417.863.217.364.917.462.516.756.317.26018.26117.963.217.662.817.760.317.861.617.962.518.164.518.255.83075.61.336.8median 17.9median 61.61.46.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus 5Huawei P10 Plus
OnePlus 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei P10 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.28 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.73 / 1.44 / 1.5 Watt
Load midlight 6.91 / 8.51 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8
3000 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
Honor 8 Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
Power Consumption
-11%
24%
-13%
-33%
14%
Idle Minimum *
0.73
0.61
16%
0.78
-7%
0.77
-5%
0.98
-34%
0.63
14%
Idle Average *
1.44
1.77
-23%
1.1
24%
2.04
-42%
2.27
-58%
1.1
24%
Idle Maximum *
1.5
1.81
-21%
1.16
23%
2.24
-49%
2.36
-57%
1.56
-4%
Load Average *
6.91
6.67
3%
4.15
40%
4.69
32%
6.58
5%
5.95
14%
Load Maximum *
8.51
10.98
-29%
5.12
40%
8.66
-2%
10.12
-19%
6.7
21%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
25h 34min
WiFi Websurfing
8h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 23min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 07min
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8
3000 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
Honor 8 Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
Battery Runtime
8%
20%
14%
-5%
39%
Reader / Idle
1534
1423
-7%
1667
9%
1835
20%
1378
-10%
1663
8%
H.264
623
810
30%
771
24%
813
30%
675
8%
914
47%
WiFi v1.3
518
494
-5%
719
39%
587
13%
573
11%
732
41%
Load
247
282
14%
264
7%
225
-9%
181
-27%
392
59%

Pros

+ 创新、轻薄、非常坚固的机身
+ 双SIM卡
+ 支持多LTE频率
+ 良好的语音质量
+ 很好地增强了Android
+ 没有多余的应用程序
+ 非常快的充电时间
+ 精确的GPS
+ OLED屏幕具有准确的颜色
+ 快速Wi-Fi
+ 很好的性能
+ 扬声器音量大
+ 能耗低
+ 实际的电池运行时间
+ 良好的自拍相机

Cons

- 主相机质量不属于高端水平
- 在长时间的负荷下会发热
- 重负荷时节流
- 滚动时,果冻效应
- 为视频互换话筒通道
- 仅有USB 2.0
- 没有microSD插槽
- 外壳不是防水或防尘
Review: OnePlus 5
Review: OnePlus 5

在对一加 5进行评测后,我们发现了许多值得被讨论的问题。让我们开始吧:

 

一加 5是“旗舰机杀手”吗?这其实取决于你对旗舰机的期待。该设备的确能跟上更为昂贵的机器的性能,但是,一加 5在自身性能上的提升却显得不足。该设备拥有许多功能,但是它不支持无线充电、快速USB接口以及更高分辨率的屏幕。同时,摄像头也没能跟上高端智能机的水准。

老用户是否有必要换新机? 如果你已经拥有 一加 2 或者更老版本设备,换新机,你的确能获得更好性能、且更新后的系统以及更薄的机身。一加 3 or 3T 则情况有所不同。鉴于没有多少变化,我们认为:换新机不是很值得。

一加 5依然物美价廉吗? 是的,一加 5以相对低的价格提供了较高的性能能。但是,它现在的价格却有了更多的竞争对手,比如说: 荣耀 8 Pro ,或者一些去年的机型,例如: 三星 Galaxy S7 Edge。价格299美元的 一加 1 无疑是最便宜的智能手机,而一加 5,其价格在530美元,也算不错,但是不是很有竞争力。

一加5给我们什么样的整体印象呢?第一年的兴奋已经明显地消失了。其中一个原因是错误安装的屏幕导致了果冻效应,同时存在这紧急呼叫的错误。在新的溢价下,这些问题可能不会那么容易被接受。同时,制造商通常对于任何检测到的缺陷都会做出快速的示范性回应:对于紧急呼叫的错误,他们都会在几天之内提供更新。他们至少也回应了我们关于难以理解基准数据的评论,并且开放交流。撇开所有问题:一加 5在性价比方面几乎没有竞争对手。不变的Android系统、创新的插件、众多的配件、具有特殊电影风格的色彩空间的屏幕和双SIM卡更是其独特的卖点。

一加 5是拥有旗舰机质量的价格相对便宜的智能手机。虽然对照相质量的提升很小,但是在其他方面却做的不错:性能,屏幕,外壳和通话质量。

一加 5并不完美,但价格不错,而且仍然是非常好的旗舰机。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里 

OnePlus 5 - 07/25/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer

Chassis
91%
Keyboard
69 / 75 → 92%
Pointing Device
95%
Connectivity
48 / 60 → 80%
Weight
92%
Battery
91%
Display
90%
Games Performance
65 / 63 → 100%
Application Performance
61 / 70 → 87%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
67 / 91 → 74%
Camera
80%
Average
80%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 一加 5 智能手机简短评测
Florian Wimmer, 2017-08-23 (Update: 2017-08-23)