测试中的 "回血"。笔记本和台式机基准测试

对抗僵尸群的合作战斗。

Back 4 Blood让人很容易联想到以前的Left 4 Dead。这也难怪，因为这款射击游戏来自同一个开发商的工作室。我们用几个笔记本和台式机的GPU检查了这个动作标题的图形要求。

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), Published 10/23/2021 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Laptop / Notebook Desktop Gamecheck

技术

Back 4 Blood》应该是连续射击爱好者的一个好选择。这款来自Turtle Rock Studios的僵尸射击游戏将无数的亡灵和特殊怪物送到玩家身后或虚拟猎枪前。

整个事情的发生有一个坚实的技术基础。所使用的虚幻引擎4的特点是相当好的纹理和一流的效果。除了照明之外，粒子效果（例如武器）和火焰显示（火焰、爆炸等）也很有说服力。这套作品因同质化和令人愉悦的图形风格和整体外观而更加完美。

就游戏性而言，《喋血双雄》--正如一开始提到的--与《左撇子》系列非常相似，尽管开发商遵循了当前的趋势，将重点放在了定制上。在其他方面，我们有武器升级、购物系统和特殊技能卡。可以说，《左4死》与《战地》的结合。在我们看来，枪法和动作也是最新的。

简而言之：如果你正在寻找一个有趣的，而且--取决于难度等级--相当有挑战性的子弹大餐，《Back 4 Blood》应该是一个不错的选择，尤其是你还可以在多人模式下冒充特殊的怪物，而不是人类玩家。在单人模式中，不幸的是仍然需要在线连接，你必须与半路出家的智能机器人打交道，这也有一段时间的娱乐性。

但回到技术方面。在图形菜单中，你可以在两张截图中进一步看到，有超过20个设置选项。从分辨率（不幸的是，在无边界全屏中只有显示器的原始分辨率可用；传统的全屏不存在）、视场和运动模糊等经典功能开始，还有一些现代功能，如升频（包括DLSS）和色差。

作为边缘平滑，Back 4 Blood支持FXAA和TAA。必要时，你还可以在DirectX 11和DirectX 12之间切换。如果需要，还可以启用V-Sync和FPS限制。

同样值得称赞的是各种预设的存在。这些预设负责处理五个折叠式质量滑块。设置的改变（除DirectX外）不需要重新启动，而是直接采用，这也是加分的地方。如果开发商能在各个图形选项中加入简短的文字解释，那就更好了。

游戏的大小约为25GB，以今天的标准来看是适中的。游戏中的加载时间还算不错。只有游戏的启动需要一点时间。

基准

为了获得尽可能一致的结果，我们不使用任务来做基准，而是使用你在任务之间进入的大厅营地 "希望堡"。根据我们的经验，基准序列的帧率与真实任务相当匹配。虽然后者可能会有明显的性能波动或下降，这取决于僵尸的数量和特效的数量，但平均帧率同样很高（第一幕的任务1和2在具有最大细节的RTX 3070上各检查200秒）。

在CapFrameX工具的帮助下，我们记录了30秒的仓库冲刺，其中包含各种物体、人物和火元素。由于这是一个快速的第一人称射击游戏，系统应该达到平均至少40 FPS或--为了更好地应对特别是CPU密集和图像密集的情况--超过60 FPS。

▶ load Youtube video

结果

对于基准，我们主要使用从我们的合作伙伴XMG (Schenker Technologies)借来的设备。和MSI.

FHD (1,920 x 1,080)

与当前其他游戏相比，《回到4号血案》不一定需要真正的游戏电脑。入门级GPU的水平为 GeForce MX450至少可以处理1,920 x 1,080像素和低预设。在作出一些妥协后，中等预设也是可能的。中档显卡如 GeForce GTX 1650(Ti)可以轻松应对全高清下的高和史诗级预设。

Back 4 Blood
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12) 1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) AA:FX 1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) AA:T 1920x1080 Epic Preset (DX12) AA:T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP	378 (26.3^min, 184^P0.1, 235^P1) fps ∼50% 281 (44.4^min, 139^P0.1, 180^P1) fps ∼43% 235 (38.8^min, 121^P0.1, 148^P1) fps ∼40% 220 (43.6^min, 105^P0.1, 141^P1) fps ∼37%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP	377 (30.5^min, 185^P0.1, 239^P1) fps ∼50% 273 (40^min, 150^P0.1, 194^P1) fps ∼42% 227 (31.9^min, 137^P0.1, 162^P1) fps ∼39% 209 (25.9^min, 118^P0.1, 146^P1) fps ∼35%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X	332 (75.7^min, 152^P0.1, 189^P1) fps ∼44% 300 (70.7^min, 139^P0.1, 173^P1) fps ∼46% 274 (67.3^min, 113^P0.1, 144^P1) fps ∼47% 272 (75.9^min, 122^P0.1, 150^P1) fps ∼45%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X	321 (56^min, 155^P0.1, 187^P1) fps ∼43% 295 (120^min, 145^P0.1, 176^P1) fps ∼45% 260 (30.6^min, 128^P0.1, 155^P1) fps ∼44% 248 (62.8^min, 128^P0.1, 155^P1) fps ∼41%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio	317 (136^min, 155^P0.1, 190^P1) fps ∼42% 290 (116^min, 129^P0.1, 168^P1) fps ∼45% 273 (97.6^min, 120^P0.1, 154^P1) fps ∼47% 270 (77.4^min, 119^P0.1, 149^P1) fps ∼45%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP	288 (23.2^min, 93^P0.1, 176^P1) fps ∼38% 212 (18.5^min, 65.8^P0.1, 143^P1) fps ∼33% 181 (51.7^min, 67.1^P0.1, 124^P1) fps ∼31% 163 (57.4^min, 84.7^P0.1, 113^P1) fps ∼27%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP	205 (22.6^min, 106^P0.1, 134^P1) fps ∼27% 152 (55.7^min, 87.1^P0.1, 96.8^P1) fps ∼23% 123 (26.3^min, 48.7^P0.1, 78^P1) fps ∼21% 114 (59.4^min, 61.4^P0.1, 70.2^P1) fps ∼19%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD	197 (24.8^min, 96.1^P0.1, 124^P1) fps ∼26% 146 (57.2^min, 75.2^P0.1, 97.6^P1) fps ∼22% 126 (57.9^min, 70.9^P0.1, 83.4^P1) fps ∼21% 115 (63.4^min, 64.9^P0.1, 73.4^P1) fps ∼19%
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H Dell G5 15 SE	184 (44.8^min, 105^P0.1, 118^P1) fps ∼24% 137 (32.2^min, 69.2^P0.1, 78.3^P1) fps ∼21% 117 (6.13^min, 55.3^P0.1, 65.8^P1) fps ∼20% 110 (52.7^min, 55.6^P0.1, 59.4^P1) fps ∼18%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GP75	157 (26.9^min, 89.7^P0.1, 100^P1) fps ∼21% 106 (51.3^min, 57.1^P0.1, 63.7^P1) fps ∼16% 91.5 (47.3^min, 48.1^P0.1, 54.2^P1) fps ∼16% 83.8 (45.5^min, 45.8^P0.1, 49.7^P1) fps ∼14%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GL75	147 (22.1^min, 84.5^P0.1, 92.3^P1) fps ∼19% 96 (31.8^min, 51^P0.1, 57.2^P1) fps ∼15% 82.3 (41.8^min, 44.8^P0.1, 49.4^P1) fps ∼14% 75 (38.7^min, 40.3^P0.1, 43.8^P1) fps ∼13%
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-11370H Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15	77 (22.8^min, 27.1^P0.1, 41.8^P1) fps ∼10% 46.3 (13.5^min, 18.1^P0.1, 22.7^P1) fps ∼7% 35.3 (11.8^min, 12.1^P0.1, 14.9^P1) fps ∼6% 33 (13.4^min, 14.1^P0.1, 15.2^P1) fps ∼6%

QHD (2,560 x 1,440)

后面的中端GPU甚至在理论上可以处理2,560 x 1,440像素和最大细节的混合，尽管我们会推荐一个来自中高端的型号，以获得全面流畅的游戏体验（例如。 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti或 Radeon RX 5600M).

Back 4 Blood
2560x1440 Epic Preset (DX12) AA:T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X	241 (76.5^min, 101^P0.1, 139^P1) fps ∼42%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio	223 (67.7^min, 98^P0.1, 132^P1) fps ∼38%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X	179 (59.9^min, 90.4^P0.1, 117^P1) fps ∼31%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP	146 (25.2^min, 53^P0.1, 101^P1) fps ∼25%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP	140 (39.1^min, 56.1^P0.1, 89.9^P1) fps ∼24%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP	111 (19.8^min, 31.8^P0.1, 69.4^P1) fps ∼19%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP	75 (26.3^min, 27.7^P0.1, 42.7^P1) fps ∼13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD	74.3 (25.1^min, 26.4^P0.1, 34.4^P1) fps ∼13%
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H Dell G5 15 SE	71.4 (30.5^min, 31.3^P0.1, 35.5^P1) fps ∼12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GP75	52.7 (22.8^min, 25.9^P0.1, 28.1^P1) fps ∼9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GL75	49.1 (23.9^min, 24.2^P0.1, 26.2^P1) fps ∼8%

UHD (3,840 x 2,160)

另一方面，3,840 x 2,160像素与Epic预设相结合，应该只在高端代表上释放(GeForce RTX 3060以上）。)该标题的VRAM要求通常似乎在限制范围内。6GB足以满足所有常见的分辨率和质量水平。

Back 4 Blood
3840x2160 Epic Preset (DX12) AA:T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X	151 (53.3^min, 67.3^P0.1, 103^P1) fps ∼34%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio	131 (48.9^min, 55.3^P0.1, 87.5^P1) fps ∼30%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X	96.4 (44.5^min, 50.9^P0.1, 61.7^P1) fps ∼22%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP	76.6 (15.4^min, 21.6^P0.1, 45.9^P1) fps ∼17%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP	71.7 (31.9^min, 34.3^P0.1, 40.6^P1) fps ∼16%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP	57.2 (14^min, 16.4^P0.1, 30.9^P1) fps ∼13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD	37.4 (19.3^min, 19.5^P0.1, 20.1^P1) fps ∼8%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP	37.3 (14.4^min, 18.1^P0.1, 19.3^P1) fps ∼8%
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H Dell G5 15 SE	36.3 (14.9^min, 15.2^P0.1, 16.4^P1) fps ∼8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GP75	26.1 (12.4^min, 12.5^P0.1, 13^P1) fps ∼6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GL75	23.3 (11.3^min, 11.5^P0.1, 12.3^P1) fps ∼5%

注意事项

由于游戏测试非常耗时，而且经常受到安装或激活限制的阻碍，因此我们只能为您提供文章发表时的部分基准测试。更多的显卡将在未来几天和几周内安装。

Overview

Test system

XMG Neo 15 (RTX 3080) - 点击照片，打开配置器 (bestware.com)

XMG Neo 17 (RTX 3070) - 点击照片，打开配置器 (bestware.com)

XMG Core 15 (RTX 3060) - 点击照片打开配置器 (bestware.com)

XMG Focus 17 (RTX 3050 Ti) - 点击照片打开配置器 (bestware.com)

设备	显卡	处理器	内存	操作系统
XMG Neo 15	NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 @165 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Neo 17	NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Core 15	NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 @130 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Focus 17	NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 Ti @75 W TGP (4 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
微星GP65	NvidiaGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (6 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-9750H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64位
微星GP75	NvidiaGeForce GTX 1650 Ti (4 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-10750H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64位
微星GL75	NvidiaGeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-10750H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
小米RedmiBook Pro 15	NvidiaGeForce MX450 (2 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-11370H	1 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64位
戴尔G5 15 SE	AMD Radeon RX 5600M (6 GB GDDR6)	AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64位
微星 Prestige 14 Evo	Intel Iris Xe (96 CUs)	Intel Core i7-1185G7	1 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
台式电脑I	MSIGeForce RTX 3090 (24 GB GDDR6X) MSIGeForce RTX 3080 (10 GB GDDR6X) MSIGeForce RTX 3070 (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-9900K	4 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
桌面-PC II	NvidiaGeForce RTX 3090 FE (24 GB GDDR6X) Nvidia Titan RTX (24 GB GDDR6) NvidiaGeForce RTX 2070 Super (8 GB GDDR6)NvidiaGeForce RTX 2060 Super (8 GB GDDR6) KFA2GeForce GTX 1660 Super (6 GB GDDR6) PNYGeForce GTX 1660 (6 GB GDDR5) KFA2GeForce GTX 1650 Super(4 GB GDDR6) KFA2GeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR5) AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (12 GB DDR6) AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (8 GB GDDR6) AMD RadeonRX 5700 XT (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5700 (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (6 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (8 GB GDDR6)	AMD Ryzen 9 5900X	2 x 32 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit

4K显示器	Nvidia驱动	AMD驱动
华硕PB287Q,飞利浦Brilliance 329P9H, Acer Predator XB321HK	ForceWare 496.13	Adrenalin 21.10.2

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 470341 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 23680 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 测试中的 "回血"。笔记本和台式机基准测试

Florian Glaser, 2021-10-23 (Update: 2024-08-15)

Pos	Model	< Prev Next > Back 4 Blood (2021)
Pos	Model	low 1280x720 Low Preset (DX12)	med. 1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) FXAA	high 1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) TAA	ultra 1920x1080 Epic Preset (DX12) TAA	QHD 2560x1440 Epic Preset (DX12) TAA	4K 3840x2160 Epic Preset (DX12) TAA
11	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	403		309	309	327
13	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090		302.5ⁿ²	284ⁿ²	278.5ⁿ²	236ⁿ²	141ⁿ²
21	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU		345	295	276	188.4	112
25	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080		290	273	270	223	131
30	AMD Radeon RX 6800		306	292	273	199	100
32	NVIDIA Titan RTX		294	270	255	182	101
36	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		294	263	238	171	88.9
38	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		252	221	209	129.4	73.7
41	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070		295	260	248	179	96.4
44	AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT		262	227	207	145	72
45	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU		281	235	220	146	76.6
52	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		220ⁿ²	192.05ⁿ²	181.9ⁿ²	122.45ⁿ²	63.9
55	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU		245	197.5	188.2
59	AMD Radeon RX 6800M		170	151	152
61	AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT		228	188	168	110	56.3
64	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU		246.5ⁿ²	216ⁿ²	201ⁿ²	140	71.7
66	AMD Radeon RX 6800S		230	198	182	119	58.9
69	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060		214	191	178	115	57.4
76	AMD Radeon RX 6700M		195	163	149
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Back 4 Blood
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
78	NVIDIA Titan X Pascal		219	191	177	121	64.9
82	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop)		237	213	193	129	66.3
86	AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)		218	185	170	114	59.5
92	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	293	201ⁿ²	170ⁿ³	153ⁿ³	107.5ⁿ²	55.25ⁿ²
94	AMD Radeon RX 7600S		186.9	155.2	146	94.7	48.4
101	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)		190	173	156	103	52.9
103	AMD Radeon RX 6600		197	166	145	90.4	46
107	AMD Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop)		183	157	146	96.9	49.1
109	AMD Radeon RX 6600M			189	172	124
110	AMD Radeon RX 6700S		200	171.3	157.3	92.4
136	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050		158	135	125	82.9	41.5
138	AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop)		172	150	138	91.9	48
146	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)		154	140	126	80.3	39
148	AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT		140	117	109	68.1	27.7
149	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop)		121	103	93.6	62.2	30.8
150	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	332	221	166.1	155.3
153*	Intel Arc A730M		132.9	115.4	105.9	68.3
155	AMD Radeon RX 5600M		137	117	110	71.4	36.3
158	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		146	126	115	74.3	37.4
159	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU		147.4ⁿ²	123.4ⁿ²	115.1ⁿ²	75	37.3
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Back 4 Blood
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
164	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)		140	124	113	71.2	34.6
167	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)		128	113	102	63.7	30
175	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	247	138	112	103
181	AMD Radeon RX 6500M		116	95.3	92.7
194	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile		107	89.6	81.1
196	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile		106	91.5	83.8	52.7	26.1
198	AMD Radeon RX 5500M		92.5	77.4	72.3
208	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	155	82.4	65.8	65.3
212	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop)		96.5	84.9	77.8	48.4	23.2
214	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		96	82.3	75	49.1	23.3
238*	Intel Arc A350M	139.3	60.2	48.1	46	31	14.9
265	AMD Radeon 680M	167	65.2	54.4	49.3
271*	NVIDIA GeForce MX450	128.3	46.6ⁿ²	32.35ⁿ²	29.85ⁿ²
286	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile		43.7	40.4	32.4
300	AMD Radeon 660M	104.3	40.4	34.3
311	AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	118	49.7	41.5	36.9
333	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	60.2ⁿ²	36.95ⁿ²	32.55ⁿ²	33.7
334	NVIDIA GeForce MX350	99.6	37.2	29.2	26.5
343	AMD Radeon RX 550 (Laptop)	66.1	19.6	14.2	13.9
349	NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)	73.4	29.9	24.6	23.1
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Back 4 Blood
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
351	NVIDIA GeForce MX250	76.9	27.6	24	23.5
354	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	45.5ⁿ²	24.4ⁿ²	22.85ⁿ²	19.8ⁿ²
378*	AMD Radeon 540X	62.7	21.9	18.3
399*	Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	46.6	20	17.1
400*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 10	54.2	22.6	18.8	16.8
437*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs	34.8ⁿ³	18.2ⁿ³	14.9ⁿ³	13.2
439*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	32.7	15.6
440	Intel UHD Graphics 770	34.7	17.4	13.4
450*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	94.4ⁿ²	29.5ⁿ³	24.6ⁿ³	21.5ⁿ³	15.5	7.53
459	AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	65.45ⁿ²	31.15ⁿ²	24.75ⁿ²	21.85ⁿ²
476	NVIDIA GeForce MX130	35.7	19.5	15.4	13.6
481	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)	51.2	17.9	14.9	13.6
484	NVIDIA GeForce 930MX	46	16.7	11.6
606*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)	49.5	10.2
607*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 5	51.6	18.3	15.7
608	Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)	25.2	11.2
609	Intel UHD Graphics 630	21.3	8.71
611*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	19	9.27
619	Intel UHD Graphics 620	19.5
692	AMD Radeon R5 M255	31.6	10.5
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Back 4 Blood
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
693*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 3	31.45ⁿ²	11.5ⁿ²	9.96
748*	Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)	12.8

Legend
5	Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
	May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
	May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?	Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
	Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.