一加7 Pro智能手机评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
|
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 586 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.39 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.243
OnePlus 7 Pro AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus OLED, 3040x1440, 6.4" | Apple iPhone Xs Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5" | Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | Huawei P30 Pro OLED, 2340x1080, 6.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -66% | -3% | 11% | -189% | -16% | |
Brightness middle | 586 | 710 21% | 656 12% | 593 1% | 435 -26% | 597 2% |
Brightness | 584 | 721 23% | 659 13% | 587 1% | 442 -24% | 608 4% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 97 0% | 88 -9% | 94 -3% | 95 -2% | 89 -8% |
Black Level * | ||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.39 | 3.7 -166% | 1.7 -22% | 0.9 35% | 6.79 -388% | 2.2 -58% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.7 | 10.3 -281% | 2.8 -4% | 2 26% | 14.93 -453% | 3.6 -33% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 1.5 6% | 1.7 -6% | 1.5 6% | 5.4 -238% | 1.6 -0% |
Gamma | 2.243 98% | 2.1 105% | 1.998 110% | 2.27 97% | 2.252 98% | 2.23 99% |
CCT | 6672 97% | 6611 98% | 6487 100% | 6548 99% | 7588 86% | 6268 104% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 122 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 122 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 122 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10330 - 14439, n=19) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8342 - 11440, n=19) |
Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (24.5 - 36.3, n=3) | |
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (22.7 - 32.2, n=2) | |
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (33.1 - 37.4, n=3) |
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Apple iPhone Xs Max | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1075 - 1425, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 67, n=16) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samung Browser 9.0) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years) | |
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (42.5 - 67.9, n=15) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chome 74) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12) | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90 - 129, n=20) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 33918, n=21) | |
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition (Chrome 71) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition (Chrome 71) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=19) | |
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12) |
* ... smaller is better
OnePlus 7 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | Xiaomi Mi 9 | OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition | Huawei P30 Pro | Average 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -28% | 125% | -28% | 116% | 184% | 376% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 1468 | 811 -45% | 666 -55% | 733 -50% | 849 -42% | 1547 ? 5% | 1834 ? 25% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 387 | 249.1 -36% | 388.3 0% | 253.3 -35% | 250.8 -35% | 575 ? 49% | 1426 ? 268% |
Random Read 4KB | 174.1 | 135.2 -22% | 149.4 -14% | 145.1 -17% | 174.4 0% | 210 ? 21% | 278 ? 60% |
Random Write 4KB | 24.8 | 22.7 -8% | 165.3 567% | 22.3 -10% | 159.2 542% | 188.5 ? 660% | 310 ? 1150% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 73 ? | 82.6 ? | 70.6 ? | ||||
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 60.7 ? | 68.2 ? | 59.8 ? |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
OnePlus 7 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 87% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 87% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 87% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (123.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 66.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 66.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 66.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0 / 0.1 Watt |
Idle | 0.9 / 1.8 / 2.9 Watt |
Load |
5.5 / 8.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 4100 mAh | Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh | OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition 3700 mAh | Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 8% | 17% | 26% | 20% | 7% | 11% | 6% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.9 | 0.73 19% | 1 -11% | 0.67 26% | 0.6 33% | 0.68 24% | 0.939 ? -4% | 0.895 ? 1% |
Idle Average * | 1.8 | 1.53 15% | 1.4 22% | 1.26 30% | 1.3 28% | 2.6 -44% | 1.506 ? 16% | 1.447 ? 20% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.9 | 2.07 29% | 1.7 41% | 1.29 56% | 2.1 28% | 2.77 4% | 1.799 ? 38% | 1.608 ? 45% |
Load Average * | 5.5 | 6.03 -10% | 4.6 16% | 3.71 33% | 4.5 18% | 3.74 32% | 4.61 ? 16% | 6.41 ? -17% |
Load Maximum * | 8.2 | 9.18 -12% | 6.7 18% | 9.3 -13% | 8.6 -5% | 6.82 17% | 9.04 ? -10% | 9.61 ? -17% |
* ... smaller is better
OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 4100 mAh | Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh | OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition 3700 mAh | Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -14% | -9% | -7% | 18% | 29% | |
Reader / Idle | 1745 | 1560 -11% | 1305 -25% | 1650 -5% | 1966 13% | |
H.264 | 802 | 921 15% | 801 0% | 1008 26% | 1193 49% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 768 | 483 -37% | 742 -3% | 546 -29% | 905 18% | 838 9% |
Load | 236 | 187 -21% | 223 -6% | 194 -18% | 344 46% |
Pros
Cons
OnePlus 7 Pro是国产旗舰智能手机的一次令人印象深刻的尝试。该设备具有快速存储,良好的续航时间,快速充电,优质的设计,改进的指纹识别和非异形屏。哦,它也有90 Hz的刷新率,别忘了还有电动弹出式前置摄像头,这肯定会很有回头率。立体声扬声器给我们留下了深刻的印象,它们的声音浓郁而温暖。
7 Pro可能是迄今为止最昂贵的一加设备,但无论您购买哪个版本,价格仍然低于其他旗舰机。它的充电时间短,屏幕与机身比高,90 Hz显示,在某些地方的表现优于其他旗舰。
我们确实有一些要批评的地方。曲面屏的确很好看,但实用性不强,这也导致了机身的厚重。此外,7 Pro运行时温度较高,以至于某些人在长时间的游戏过程中难以握住设备。我们希望一加能够对其设备进行IP认证,并添加无线充电,因为与其他旗舰相比,这些都是7 Pro明显的短板。其他设备也提供更快的Wi-Fi,而一加对于移除耳机插孔的选择仍然看起来没有任何理由。
OnePlus 7 Pro是一款令人印象深刻的旗舰产品,功能繁多,使其与同时代的产品脱颖而出。
热管有助于防止SoC性能受到限制,并没有让855比在小米Mi 9中表现得更好。后置三摄通常也会拍摄出色的照片,不过默认的夜视模式并不出色。无论如何,自动模式仍然可以在光线不足的情况下拍摄好照片,所以这并非全是坏消息。
简而言之,7 Pro有一些弱点,但没有一个是致命的。以前的一加智能手机并没有像华为和三星设备那样在发布后几个月就降价。因此,与Galaxy S10+或P30 Pro相比,7 Pro可能会在今年年底时显得没那么有性价比。这只是一些值得记住的事情,并不应该阻止你选择7 Pro,这是一款出色的旗舰智能手机。
OnePlus 7 Pro
-
09/03/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt