总决赛回顾笔记本电脑和台式机基准测试

富有创意的游戏概念。

总决赛》为多人射击游戏带来了一股新鲜空气。我们对这款激动人心的游戏的技术和图形要求进行了分析。

Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 12/21/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Laptop / Notebook Desktop Gamecheck

测试系统

华硕 TUF Gaming Advantage A16（RX 7600S 和 780M）

飞利浦 Evnia 8000 系列 41.5 英寸 UHD OLED 游戏显示器

我们目前使用这些设备进行游戏基准测试。点击照片可进入相应制造商的网站。有关规格的更多详情，请参阅文章末尾。

技术

尽管它的视觉效果色彩斑斓、对比强烈（让人联想起镜之边缘和其他游戏一样），但《总决赛》提供了非常出色的画面。底层的虚幻引擎 5 凭借清晰的纹理和出色的特效（火焰、泡沫......）表现出色。一流的反射效果尤其给我们留下了深刻的印象，如果没有动态 RTX 全局光照，这种效果已经非常令人印象深刻了。可破坏环境是另一个亮点和战术特色。

这款 Free2Play 游戏在大多数其他方面也给人留下了深刻印象，无论是音效、动作还是枪法。总的来说，《总决赛》的游戏过程非常流畅，除非出现卡顿等问题。

在图形菜单方面，我们也几乎没有什么可抱怨的。除了分辨率、图像模式和 VSync 等经典功能外，还有各种现代功能，如升频（DLSS、FSR、XeSS）和帧生成。底部有近 10 个画质和细节控制按钮，可通过预设值进行更改，而无需重新启动游戏。与其他一些游戏不同的是，该游戏没有样本图像，但至少有对各个设置的解释。

从技术角度来看，《总决赛》给人的印象非常干净利落。虽然游戏启动时间有点长，不符合我们的口味，但它只占用了硬盘大约 17 GB 的空间。

基准

我们使用所谓的 "练习场 "进行速度测量，因为这可以实现恒定、可重现的序列（见视频）。总而言之，《总决赛》对硬件的要求相当适中。由于在正常游戏过程中可能会出现激烈场景（爆炸等）性能下降的情况，我们的基准测试序列（可以说是缓冲区）应至少达到 60 FPS。

▶ load Youtube video

成果

全高清（1,920 x 1,080）

虽然 iGPU 在潘多拉星球的阿凡达前沿测试中 Radeon 780M在运行 "总决赛 "时，至少能满足 1,920 x 1,080 像素和中低细节的要求。中端 GPU 如 GeForce RTX 4050级别的中端 GPU，您在全高清玩游戏时会比较安全，也能充分享受最高设置。

The Finals
1920x1080 Low Preset 1920x1080 Medium Preset 1920x1080 High Preset 1920x1080 Epic Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	317 (109.6^min, 198.1^P0.1, 235^P1) fps ∼100% 309 (67.9^min, 195.9^P0.1, 236^P1) fps ∼100% 302 (149.3^min, 192.3^P0.1, 225^P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	295 (120.6^min, 186.6^P0.1, 220^P1) fps ∼93% 286 (59.7^min, 166.8^P0.1, 204^P1) fps ∼93% 258 (161.5^min, 168.1^P0.1, 186.1^P1) fps ∼85%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H Asus ROG Zephyrus M16	193 (52.1^min, 59.2^P0.1, 103.6^P1) fps ∼61% 175.1 (33.8^min, 40.2^P0.1, 63^P1) fps ∼57% 174.1 (31.4^min, 42.3^P0.1, 67.1^P1) fps ∼58%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX Razer Blade 16 Mid 23	175.5 (35.4^min, 48.6^P0.1, 94.8^P1) fps ∼55% 174.8 (28.8^min, 55.6^P0.1, 110.4^P1) fps ∼57% 171.4 (14.4^min, 57.6^P0.1, 104.1^P1) fps ∼57%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	186.6 (25.4^min, 97.2^P0.1, 131.9^P1) fps ∼59% 180.6 (53^min, 97.1^P0.1, 124.3^P1) fps ∼58% 156.7 (76.4^min, 100.5^P0.1, 114.6^P1) fps ∼52%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX	212 (57.1^min, 89.8^P0.1, 150.1^P1) fps ∼67% 190.1 (42.9^min, 83.8^P0.1, 133.2^P1) fps ∼62% 156.4 (45.7^min, 67.4^P0.1, 112.9^P1) fps ∼52%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS Razer Blade 14 Mid 23	176 (72.3^min, 95.3^P0.1, 127.6^P1) fps ∼56% 157.7 (19.9^min, 60.1^P0.1, 115.6^P1) fps ∼51% 126 (38.9^min, 73.3^P0.1, 93.8^P1) fps ∼42%
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16	155.9 (82.3^min, 102.8^P0.1, 114.9^P1) fps ∼49% 133.7 (89.2^min, 95^P0.1, 100^P1) fps ∼43% 100.8 (64.2^min, 69.5^P0.1, 75.1^P1) fps ∼33%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H Medion Erazer Scout E20	154.7 (72.1^min, 84^P0.1, 111.7^P1) fps ∼49% 133.5 (67^min, 74.3^P0.1, 95.9^P1) fps ∼43% 99.2 (55.1^min, 63.8^P0.1, 71.7^P1) fps ∼33%
AMD Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16	70.2 (12.9^min, 26.8^P0.1, 49.6^P1) fps ∼100% 51.7 (10.4^min, 12.4^P0.1, 37.1^P1) fps ∼16% 46.8 (10.7^min, 13.5^P0.1, 34^P1) fps ∼15% 30.6 (19.8^min, 19.9^P0.1, 20.9^P1) fps ∼10%

QHD (2,560 x 1,440)

QHD 显示器也不需要高端组件。从 Radeon RX 7600S在 2,560 x 1,440 像素和 Epic 预设值下，60 FPS 大关已被攻破。

The Finals
2560x1440 Epic Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	208 (120.6^min, 133.8^P0.1, 159.1^P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	172.4 (112.1^min, 124^P0.1, 133.3^P1) fps ∼83%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H Asus ROG Zephyrus M16	137.2 (37.2^min, 49.8^P0.1, 94.2^P1) fps ∼66%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX Razer Blade 16 Mid 23	125.5 (42^min, 48.9^P0.1, 80.6^P1) fps ∼60%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX	100.7 (73^min, 73.8^P0.1, 77.4^P1) fps ∼48%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	94.6 (58.2^min, 65.2^P0.1, 71.9^P1) fps ∼45%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS Razer Blade 14 Mid 23	77.7 (56^min, 56.9^P0.1, 61.2^P1) fps ∼37%
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16	61.5 (43.5^min, 44.4^P0.1, 47.7^P1) fps ∼30%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H Medion Erazer Scout E20	54.6 (35.2^min, 35.7^P0.1, 40.1^P1) fps ∼26%

超高清（3,840 x 2,160）

通常情况下，只有在达到 4K 时，要求才会变得真正苛刻。A GeForce RTX 4080或更高配置才能使用史诗预设。

The Finals
3840x2160 Epic Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	100.3 (44.6^min, 73.7^P0.1, 78^P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	83 (30.3^min, 63.8^P0.1, 66.9^P1) fps ∼83%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H Asus ROG Zephyrus M16	67 (17.3^min, 37.3^P0.1, 50.3^P1) fps ∼67%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX Razer Blade 16 Mid 23	60.3 (34.2^min, 43.8^P0.1, 46.5^P1) fps ∼60%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX	47.5 (34.7^min, 36^P0.1, 38.2^P1) fps ∼47%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	42.9 (12.3^min, 25^P0.1, 33^P1) fps ∼43%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS Razer Blade 14 Mid 23	35.6 (27.2^min, 27.4^P0.1, 28.1^P1) fps ∼35%
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16	27.6 (21.2^min, 21.4^P0.1, 21.8^P1) fps ∼28%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H Medion Erazer Scout E20	27.3 (19.7^min, 19.9^P0.1, 21.5^P1) fps ∼27%

光线追踪与 DLSS

动态全局光照形式的主动光线追踪所耗费的性能少得令人惊讶，与不使用 RTX 的情况相比，在全高清模式下使用相同的 GPU 建议。如果在 4000 代 Nvidia 芯片上开启高质量 DLSS 和帧生成功能，则 RTX 4060就能在 4K 下达到 60 FPS。

The Finals
1920x1080 Epic Preset + Epic RTX Global Illumination 3840x2160 Epic Preset + Epic RTX Global Illumination + Quality DLSS + FG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	267 (119.2^min, 169.8^P0.1, 204^P1) fps ∼100% 162.8 (76.6^min, 93.8^P0.1, 143^P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	236 (57.6^min, 144.6^P0.1, 172.2^P1) fps ∼88%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H Asus ROG Zephyrus M16	159.8 (40.5^min, 63.6^P0.1, 107.8^P1) fps ∼60% 109.2 (29^min, 40.7^P0.1, 64^P1) fps ∼67%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX Razer Blade 16 Mid 23	158.9 (36.3^min, 53.2^P0.1, 95^P1) fps ∼60% 102.5 (25.7^min, 40^P0.1, 77.5^P1) fps ∼63%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX	143.2 (32.6^min, 62^P0.1, 103.4^P1) fps ∼54%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	142.2 (59.3^min, 88.9^P0.1, 106.5^P1) fps ∼53% 70.5 (53^min, 54.7^P0.1, 57.8^P1) fps ∼43%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS Razer Blade 14 Mid 23	121.1 (60.6^min, 76.7^P0.1, 91^P1) fps ∼45% 60.1 (26^min, 34.8^P0.1, 47.9^P1) fps ∼37%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H Medion Erazer Scout E20	96.8 (48.4^min, 60.1^P0.1, 68.5^P1) fps ∼36% 40.6 (29.1^min, 30.8^P0.1, 33.5^P1) fps ∼25%
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16	95 (44.4^min, 64.4^P0.1, 70^P1) fps ∼36%

Overview

Test system details

笔记本电脑	显卡	处理器	内存
华硕 ROG Zephyrus M16	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 @150 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6X)	Intel Core i9-13900H	2 x 16 GB DDR5
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080 @175 W TGP (12 GB GDDR6X)	Intel Core i9-13950HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
XMG Pro 15 E23	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-13900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2 x 8 GB DDR5
Medion Erazer Scout E20	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 @100 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-13700H	2 x 8 GB DDR5
华硕 ROG Strix Scar 17	NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti @150 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-12900H	2 x 16 GB DDR5
华硕 TUF Gaming Advantage A16	AMD Radeon RX 7600S (8 GB GDDR6) & AMD Radeon 780M	AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2 x 8 GB DDR5

塔式电脑	显卡	处理器	内存
华硕 ROG Strix Z790-F	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080 (16 GB GDDR6X) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (20 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-13900K	2 x 24 GB DDR5 G.Skill

4K 显示器	操作系统	Nvidia 驱动程序	AMD 驱动程序
Philips Evnia 42M2N8900	Windows 11	ForceWare 546.33	Adrenalin 23.12.1

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 339 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 459232 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 总决赛回顾笔记本电脑和台式机基准测试

Florian Glaser, 2023-12-21 (Update: 2024-08-15)

Pos	Model	< Prev Next > The Finals (2023)
Pos	Model	low 1920x1080 Low Preset	med. 1920x1080 Medium Preset	high 1920x1080 High Preset	ultra 1920x1080 Epic Preset	QHD 2560x1440 Epic Preset	4K DLSS 3840x2160 Epic Preset + Epic RTX Global Illumination + Quality DLSS + FG	4K 3840x2160 Epic Preset
1	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	317ⁿ²	288.5ⁿ²	278ⁿ²	285ⁿ²	256.5ⁿ²	216ⁿ²	139.8ⁿ²
2	AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX	398	390	384	319	215		109.1
3	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super	425.5ⁿ²	387ⁿ²	384ⁿ²	320.5ⁿ²	213ⁿ²	167.25ⁿ²	102.65ⁿ²
4	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080		317	309	302	208	162.8	100.3
7	AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT		295	286	258	172.4		83
10	AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT	357	332	306	236	148.5		70.8
11	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	228	204.5ⁿ²	194.55ⁿ²	192.55ⁿ²	142.3ⁿ²	109.2	67
13	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	383.5ⁿ²	330.5ⁿ²	296.5ⁿ²	237ⁿ²	155.1ⁿ²		77.4ⁿ²
15	AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT	429	351	311	241	154.8		73.4
21	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	188.9	177.4ⁿ²	172.75ⁿ²	171.4ⁿ³	125.5ⁿ³	102.5	60.3
23	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB		323	279	218	144.7		72.1
30	AMD Radeon RX 6800	350	261	232	171.7	107.2		49.7
31	AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT	347	286	253	189.3	118.9		54.7
32	NVIDIA Titan RTX	324	250	225	171.5	111.6		55.1
33	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti	346	271	238	184.8	118.7		57.8
36	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		212	190.1	156.4	100.7		47.5
38	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	208	188.35ⁿ²	180.6ⁿ³	149.6ⁿ³	93.3ⁿ³	69.7ⁿ²	42.8ⁿ²
41	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070		269	228	174.1	112		53.9
42	AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT	318	229	200	147	88.8		39.3
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >The Finals
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K DLSS	4K
44	AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT	298	215	188.9	137.4	84		37.2
45	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	169	159.1	151.7	136.4ⁿ²	85ⁿ²		40.8ⁿ²
46	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	318	234	206	154.8	96.7		46.3
47	Intel Arc A770	204	161.7	146.2	121.5	83		40.5
49	AMD Radeon RX 7600	291	210	186.4	135.6	81.9		35.3
54	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	196.7	168.85ⁿ²	156.8ⁿ²	124.15ⁿ²	77.7	60.1	35.6
59	AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT	269	195	169.6	122.9	73.7		33.4
60	AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT				113	69.1		31.3
63	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	222	181.7	160.6	127.2	80.2		37.6
66*	AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT	293	216	168.6ⁿ²	128.65ⁿ²	77.4ⁿ²		36.6
67	Intel Arc A750	189.5	148.8	134.6	109.3	72.1		35.1
77	NVIDIA Titan X Pascal	200	145.2	128.2	97.4	61.4		29.2
81	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop)	252	183.9	160.6	122.6	75.7		35.1
85	AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)	212	158.2	136.9	98.9	62.2		30.1
87*	AMD Radeon RX 7600M		121.4	107.5	83.5	50.3		24
93	AMD Radeon RX 7600S		155.9	133.7	100.8	61.5		27.6
99	Intel Arc A580	183.8	142.4	128.4	101.3	64.4		30.3
100	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)	220	158.3	139.7	106.9	65.4		30.1
101*	Intel Arc A770M				106	69.6
102	AMD Radeon RX 6600	208	150	130.3	94.3	55.9		24.9
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >The Finals
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K DLSS	4K
106	AMD Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop)	187.3	135.2	119.5	87.7	54		26.1
137	AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop)	164.9	107.7	129	80.4	54.2		25.3
145	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)	165.4	116.3	101.7	75.3	44.1		18.1
147	AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT	107.8	75.2	65.8	48.6	28.2		6
148	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop)	135.1	99.7	82.6	62.6	36.7		16.7
149	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU		142.45ⁿ²	123.6ⁿ²	95.5ⁿ²	54.6	40.6	27.3
152*	Intel Arc A730M	144.7	109.2	97	77.4	48.9		22.7
157	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	136.3	112.2	98.6	72.3
163	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)	153.7	109.7	95.8	70.1	42		16.3
166	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)	142.1	98.9	85.9	61.3	35.9		11.1
169*	AMD Radeon 890M	94.6	69.9	60.2	46.2
174	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	110.1	80.3	71.4	51.3
180	AMD Radeon RX 6500M	94	84.4	77.1	56.7
195	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	101.7	77.9	68.4	49.5
204*	Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	99.5	68.9	60.5	46.4
207	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	107.7	76.4	67.8	50.9
208*	Intel Arc Graphics 140V	88.3	62.6	55.5	44.5
212*	Intel Arc Graphics 130V	79.6	62.9	55.3	44.8
213	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	100.2	70.4	60.4	43.3
214	Intel Arc A380	86	62.4	53.8	40.5
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >The Finals
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K DLSS	4K
226*	Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	70	47.7	39.7	34.6
236*	Intel Arc A310	75	53.1	46.6	34.6
253*	AMD Radeon 880M	60.7	43.3	38.5	28
256*	AMD Radeon 780M	73.2ⁿ²	55.1ⁿ²	49.55ⁿ²	33.8ⁿ²	22.1		9.7
296*	AMD Radeon 760M	54.2	38.8	35.4	24.8	13.2
332	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	6
333	NVIDIA GeForce MX350	31.5	22.4	17	12.8
350	NVIDIA GeForce MX250	31	21.8	18.5	11
353	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	27.4	20	18.4	14.4
437	Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)	16.9	11.9	10.4	7.74
438*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	24.3	16.8	12.8
439	Intel UHD Graphics 770	24	16.5	14.3
442*	AMD Radeon 740M	32.9	29.6	25.8	19.5
533*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	21.4	16.2	14.2	10.2
605*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 5	18.6	13.6
609*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	9.88

Legend
5	Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
	May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
	May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?	Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
	Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.