诺基亚 8 智能手机简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
HTC U11 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
Nokia 8 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
HTC U11 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Nokia 8 |
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 735 cd/m²
Contrast: 930:1 (Black: 0.79 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 8.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.24
Nokia 8 IPS, 2560x1440, 5.3" | OnePlus 5 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | HTC U11 Super LCD5, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy S8 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8" | Apple iPhone 8 IPS True Tone, 1334x750, 4.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 24% | 29% | 23% | 38% | |
Brightness middle | 735 | 426 -42% | 482 -34% | 566 -23% | 604 -18% |
Brightness | 707 | 431 -39% | 472 -33% | 564 -20% | 580 -18% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 93 1% | 90 -2% | 94 2% | 91 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.79 | 0.33 58% | 0.44 44% | ||
Contrast | 930 | 1461 57% | 1373 48% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.7 | 1.6 76% | 3.2 52% | 2.7 60% | 1.2 82% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.9 | 4.1 68% | 5.4 58% | 5.4 58% | 2.3 82% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.3 | 1.7 80% | 2.2 73% | 3.1 63% | 1.6 81% |
Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.25 98% | 2.22 99% | 2.15 102% | 2.25 98% |
CCT | 8906 73% | 6329 103% | 6581 99% | 6335 103% | 6688 97% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 81.57 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.87 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2358 Hz | ≤ 17 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 17 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
13.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.6 ms rise | |
↘ 9.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.2 ms rise | |
↘ 19.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Nokia 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U11 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Apple iPhone 8 |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Nokia 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U11 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Nokia 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U11 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Nokia 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U11 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Nokia 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U11 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U11 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
Nokia 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U11 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
Nokia 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U11 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
Nokia 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U11 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value) | |
Nokia 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U11 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value) | |
Nokia 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U11 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value) | |
Nokia 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U11 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value) | |
Nokia 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U11 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value) | |
Nokia 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U11 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value) | |
Nokia 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U11 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Apple iPhone 8 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Nokia 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U11 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Nokia 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U11 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Apple iPhone 8 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Nokia 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U11 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Nokia 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U11 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Apple iPhone 8 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Nokia 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U11 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Nokia 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U11 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Apple iPhone 8 |
GFXBench | |
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Nokia 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U11 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Nokia 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U11 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98) | |
HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
Apple iPhone 8 |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98) | |
HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) |
* ... smaller is better
Nokia 8 | OnePlus 5 | HTC U11 | Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 10% | 67% | -1% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 680 | 748 10% | 717 5% | 793 17% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 199.1 | 201.5 1% | 206.4 4% | 193.2 -3% |
Random Read 4KB | 145.7 | 141 -3% | 91.4 -37% | 127.2 -13% |
Random Write 4KB | 14.57 | 19.3 32% | 80 449% | 15.25 5% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 76.8 ? | 68.8 ? -10% | 63.9 ? -17% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 51.7 ? | 46.25 ? -11% | 53.5 ? 3% |
Dead Trigger 2 | |||
Settings | Value | ||
high | 60 fps |
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Settings | Value | ||
high | 30 fps | ||
very low | 30 fps |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Nokia 8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.04 / 0.5 Watt |
Idle | 0.86 / 2.13 / 2.16 Watt |
Load |
4.65 / 9.99 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Nokia 8 3090 mAh | OnePlus 5 3300 mAh | HTC U11 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh | Apple iPhone 8 1821 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 9% | 11% | 33% | 29% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.86 | 0.73 15% | 0.73 15% | 0.78 9% | 0.54 37% |
Idle Average * | 2.13 | 1.44 32% | 1.96 8% | 1.1 48% | 1.63 23% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.16 | 1.5 31% | 1.98 8% | 1.16 46% | 1.67 23% |
Load Average * | 4.65 | 6.91 -49% | 4.82 -4% | 4.15 11% | 2.74 41% |
Load Maximum * | 9.99 | 8.51 15% | 7.15 28% | 5.12 49% | 7.78 22% |
* ... smaller is better
Nokia 8 3090 mAh | OnePlus 5 3300 mAh | HTC U11 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh | Apple iPhone 8 1821 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -7% | -19% | 10% | -6% | |
Reader / Idle | 1506 | 1534 2% | 1250 -17% | 1667 11% | 1629 8% |
H.264 | 733 | 623 -15% | 498 -32% | 771 5% | 698 -5% |
WiFi v1.3 | 650 | 518 -20% | 560 -14% | 719 11% | 585 -10% |
Load | 237 | 247 4% | 212 -11% | 264 11% | 202 -15% |
Pros
Cons
Nokia 8的出彩之处在于,制作精良的铝制外壳,以及明亮的5.3英寸的超高清屏幕。而在高通骁龙 835的使用上,也获得了一些同情分。4 GB的内存,和快速Adreno 540集成显卡,确保了系统的快速运行。该机的续航时间也很长。快速充电 3.0技术与“Bothie”这个卖点结合,1300万像素的摄像头,可以同时拍照和摄影。可运行分屏模式。支持4K分辨率摄影,支持基于3个麦克风的360度环绕音。
Nokia 8 是一台高端智能手机,,它在各个方面都很优秀。紧跟了Apple iphone 8或者三星 Galaxy S8的步伐。然而,它还是不足以与最强劲的对手匹敌。
撇开诺基亚 8的那个可以吸引到用户的创新拍照方式,它仍然是一个非常好的智能手机。但是,一些小的不足阻碍了它的步伐。例如,缺乏等级为IP67的防护能力,不能防止水和灰尘进入手机。我们也希望该机有一个可以支持更多频段的快速LTE模块。一个或几个频段的缺失,阻碍了它成为一个真正的环球使用的手机的可能。与高端竞品相比,Wi-Fi传输速度并不是很让人满意。
除了我们测试的这台支持单SIM卡的机型,诺基亚也有双SIM卡型号可供选择。而128 GB存储空间的机型也会很快发布。截止到目前,相关信息还无法在诺基亚德文网站上获取。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Nokia 8
-
10/19/2017 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero