诺基亚 8 智能手机简短评测

Name: Nokia 8
Brand: Nokia

3个镜头。 通过诺基亚 8，HMD恢复了该芬兰传奇品牌，在高端手机领域的地位。在580欧元的价位下（约682美元，在某些网络零售店是565美元），用户可以获得一个制作精良的5.3英寸手机。它的双摄像头，拥有前所未有的特质。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Kangfei Zheng), Published 11/16/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of Notebooksbilliger

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Nokia 8 (8 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) 8 x 2.5 GHz, Kryo 280

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 540

Memory

4 GB

, LPPDDR4X

Display

5.30 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 554 PPI, 电容式, QHD, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, 2.5D Glass, glossy: yes

Storage

64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB

, 49.9 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米音频接口, Card Reader: micro-SD读卡器高达256 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: proximity sensor, accelerometer, e-compass, gyroscope, fingerprint scanner, Hall sensor, barometer, ANT+, Android Beam, DLNA, USB-OTG

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE Cat.9 (band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41), downloads max. 450 MBit/s, uploads max. 50 MBit/s, head SAR 0.711 W/kg, body SAR 1.330 W/kg, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 151.5 x 73.7

Battery

3090 mAh Lithium-Ion, Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 23.5 h, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 23.5 h, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 208.8 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 208.8 h

Operating System

Android 7.1 Nougat

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix dual 13 MP, f/2.0, 1,12 µm, field of view 76.9°, dual-tone flash, OIS, PDAF, IR range finder
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0, 1.12 µm, field of view 78.4˚, PDAF, screen flash

Additional features

Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, charger, charging/data cable, headset, quick start guide, SIM card slot tool, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

160 g, Power Supply: 35 g

Price

579 Euro

Links

Nokia homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy S8 Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	651 MBit/s +177%
HTC U11 Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	639 MBit/s +172%
OnePlus 5 Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	539 MBit/s +129%
Apple iPhone 8 A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)	354 MBit/s +51%
Nokia 8 Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	235 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPhone 8 A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)	915 MBit/s +289%
HTC U11 Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	394 MBit/s +68%
OnePlus 5 Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	371 MBit/s +58%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	329 MBit/s +40%
Nokia 8 Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	235 MBit/s

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Nokia 8

Canon EOS 70D

Samsung Galaxy Note 8

HTC U11

click to load images

Nokia 8

Canon EOS 70D

Samsung Galaxy Note 8

HTC U11

click to load images

Nokia 8

Canon EOS 70D

Samsung Galaxy Note 8

HTC U11


708 cd/m²	716 cd/m²	691 cd/m²
679 cd/m²	735 cd/m²	709 cd/m²
702 cd/m²	721 cd/m²	704 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

QHD tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 735 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 707.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.39 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 735 cd/m²
Contrast: 930:1 (Black: 0.79 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 8.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.24

	Nokia 8 IPS, 2560x1440, 5.3"	OnePlus 5 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"	HTC U11 Super LCD5, 2560x1440, 5.5"	Samsung Galaxy S8 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8"	Apple iPhone 8 IPS True Tone, 1334x750, 4.7"
Screen		24%	29%	23%	38%
Brightness middle	735	426 -42%	482 -34%	566 -23%	604 -18%
Brightness	707	431 -39%	472 -33%	564 -20%	580 -18%
Brightness Distribution	92	93 1%	90 -2%	94 2%	91 -1%
Black Level *	0.79		0.33 58%		0.44 44%
Contrast	930		1461 57%		1373 48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.7	1.6 76%	3.2 52%	2.7 60%	1.2 82%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	12.9	4.1 68%	5.4 58%	5.4 58%	2.3 82%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	8.3	1.7 80%	2.2 73%	3.1 63%	1.6 81%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.25 ^98%	2.22 ^99%	2.15 ^102%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	8906 ^73%	6329 ^103%	6581 ^99%	6335 ^103%	6688 ^97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)				81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)				99.87

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

2358 Hz

≤ 17 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 17 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
13.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.6 ms rise
13.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7.2 ms rise
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8	177018 Points
OnePlus 5	177156 Points 0%
HTC U11	175032 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8	171884 Points -3%
Apple iPhone 8	204270 Points +15%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 8	8282 Points
OnePlus 5	7826 Points -6%
HTC U11	8295 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8	6035 Points -27%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 8	6959 Points
OnePlus 5	6579 Points -5%
HTC U11	6828 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8	5370 Points -23%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Nokia 8	3505 Points
OnePlus 5	3790 Points +8%
HTC U11	3034 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S8	3277 Points -7%
System (sort by value)
Nokia 8	5671 Points
OnePlus 5	5902 Points +4%
HTC U11	5570 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8	5386 Points -5%
Memory (sort by value)
Nokia 8	3540 Points
OnePlus 5	4423 Points +25%
HTC U11	2085 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy S8	3039 Points -14%
Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 8	5958 Points
OnePlus 5	6144 Points +3%
HTC U11	5976 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8	6096 Points +2%
Web (sort by value)
Nokia 8	1262 Points
OnePlus 5	1287 Points +2%
HTC U11	1221 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8	1156 Points -8%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8	1924 Points
OnePlus 5	1973 Points +3%
HTC U11	1906 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8	1997 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 8	4162 Points +116%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8	6479 Points
OnePlus 5	6799 Points +5%
HTC U11	6443 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8	6711 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 8	10380 Points +60%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5	8005 Points
HTC U11	8281 Points
Samsung Galaxy S8	8490 Points

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8	40968 Points
OnePlus 5	40229 Points -2%
HTC U11	40014 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8	31532 Points -23%
Apple iPhone 8	62006 Points +51%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8	56531 Points
OnePlus 5	58001 Points +3%
HTC U11	55725 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8	36347 Points -36%
Apple iPhone 8	112424 Points +99%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 8	20951 Points
OnePlus 5	19411 Points -7%
HTC U11	20140 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8	21543 Points +3%
Apple iPhone 8	24131 Points +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 8	4814 Points
OnePlus 5	4219 Points -12%
HTC U11	4744 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8	4015 Points -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 8	5818 Points
OnePlus 5	4765 Points -18%
HTC U11	5877 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8	4923 Points -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 8	3002 Points
OnePlus 5	3012 Points 0%
HTC U11	2832 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S8	2440 Points -19%
Apple iPhone 8	1774 Points -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia 8	3655 Points
OnePlus 5	3566 Points -2%
HTC U11	3590 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8	3194 Points -13%
Apple iPhone 8	2421 Points -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 8	3894 Points
OnePlus 5	3757 Points -4%
HTC U11	3883 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8	3472 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 8	2581 Points -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 8	3010 Points
OnePlus 5	3026 Points +1%
HTC U11	2841 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S8	2494 Points -17%
Apple iPhone 8	1989 Points -34%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8	54 fps
OnePlus 5	60 fps +11%
HTC U11	58 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy S8	60 fps +11%
Apple iPhone 8	119.8 fps +122%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8	99 fps
OnePlus 5	115 fps +16%
HTC U11	91 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy S8	121 fps +22%
Apple iPhone 8	161.3 fps +63%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 8	31 fps
OnePlus 5	56 fps +81%
HTC U11	29 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy S8	41 fps +32%
Apple iPhone 8	114.5 fps +269%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8	51 fps
OnePlus 5	61 fps +20%
HTC U11	51 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8	62 fps +22%
Apple iPhone 8	70.8 fps +39%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8	17 fps
OnePlus 5	41 fps +141%
HTC U11	15 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8	23 fps +35%
Apple iPhone 8	109.7 fps +545%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8	36 fps
OnePlus 5	42 fps +17%
HTC U11	33 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy S8	24 fps -33%
Apple iPhone 8	54 fps +50%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8	13 fps
OnePlus 5	25 fps +92%
HTC U11	13 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8	13 fps 0%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8	24 fps
OnePlus 5	25 fps +4%
HTC U11	24 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8	25 fps +4%

Legend

Nokia 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

OnePlus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

HTC U11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Samsung Galaxy S8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Apple iPhone 8 Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 8	206.7 Points +226%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)	71.6 Points +13%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)	69.5 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)	65.8 Points +4%
Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98)	63.4 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 8	34163 Points +207%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)	12941 Points +16%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)	11945 Points +7%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)	11781 Points +6%
Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98)	11131 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98)	3160 ms *
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)	2760 ms * +13%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)	2622 ms * +17%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)	1887 ms * +40%
Apple iPhone 8	731 ms * +77%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPhone 8	359 Points +106%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)	194 Points +11%
Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98)	174 Points
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)	162 Points -7%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)	161 Points -7%

* ... smaller is better

	Nokia 8	OnePlus 5	HTC U11	Samsung Galaxy S8
AndroBench 3-5		10%	67%	-1%
Sequential Read 256KB	680	748 10%	717 5%	793 17%
Sequential Write 256KB	199.1	201.5 1%	206.4 4%	193.2 -3%
Random Read 4KB	145.7	141 -3%	91.4 -37%	127.2 -13%
Random Write 4KB	14.57	19.3 32%	80 449%	15.25 5%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	76.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		68.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -10%	63.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -17%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	51.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		46.25 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -11%	53.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) 3%

Dead Trigger 2
	Settings	Value
	high	60 fps

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Settings	Value
	high	30 fps
	very low	30 fps

... in comparison

Max. Load

Idle


39.2 °C	38.1 °C	43.2 °C
39.7 °C	39.5 °C	45.1 °C
39.4 °C	38.1 °C	40.6 °C

Maximum: 45.1 °C
Average: 40.3 °C


35.9 °C	36.9 °C	38.3 °C
36.6 °C	37 °C	38 °C
36.3 °C	37.4 °C	38.1 °C

Maximum: 38.3 °C
Average: 37.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 29.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Nokia 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.04 / 0.5 Watt
Idle	0.86 / 2.13 / 2.16 Watt
Load	4.65 / 9.99 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Nokia 8 3090 mAh	OnePlus 5 3300 mAh	HTC U11 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh	Apple iPhone 8 1821 mAh
Power Consumption		9%	11%	33%	29%
Idle Minimum *	0.86	0.73 15%	0.73 15%	0.78 9%	0.54 37%
Idle Average *	2.13	1.44 32%	1.96 8%	1.1 48%	1.63 23%
Idle Maximum *	2.16	1.5 31%	1.98 8%	1.16 46%	1.67 23%
Load Average *	4.65	6.91 -49%	4.82 -4%	4.15 11%	2.74 41%
Load Maximum *	9.99	8.51 15%	7.15 28%	5.12 49%	7.78 22%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		25h 06min
WiFi Websurfing		10h 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 13min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 57min

	Nokia 8 3090 mAh	OnePlus 5 3300 mAh	HTC U11 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh	Apple iPhone 8 1821 mAh
Battery Runtime		-7%	-19%	10%	-6%
Reader / Idle	1506	1534 2%	1250 -17%	1667 11%	1629 8%
H.264	733	623 -15%	498 -32%	771 5%	698 -5%
WiFi v1.3	650	518 -20%	560 -14%	719 11%	585 -10%
Load	237	247 4%	212 -11%	264 11%	202 -15%

Pros

+ 非常明亮的屏幕

+ 良好质量

+ 快速系统芯片

+ 纯净Android 7.1.1

+ 非常好的GPS定位功能

+ 优秀的相机

+ 可用立体声录制视频

+ USB 3.1 Gen.1

+ 电池续航长

+ 快速充电3.0

Cons

- 不防水或防尘

- 平庸的Wi-Fi速度

- 没有千兆LTE

- LTE频段相对较少

In review: Nokia 8 courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

Nokia 8的出彩之处在于，制作精良的铝制外壳，以及明亮的5.3英寸的超高清屏幕。而在高通骁龙 835的使用上，也获得了一些同情分。4 GB的内存，和快速Adreno 540集成显卡，确保了系统的快速运行。该机的续航时间也很长。快速充电 3.0技术与“Bothie”这个卖点结合，1300万像素的摄像头，可以同时拍照和摄影。可运行分屏模式。支持4K分辨率摄影，支持基于3个麦克风的360度环绕音。

Nokia 8 是一台高端智能手机,，它在各个方面都很优秀。紧跟了Apple iphone 8或者三星 Galaxy S8的步伐。然而，它还是不足以与最强劲的对手匹敌。

撇开诺基亚 8的那个可以吸引到用户的创新拍照方式，它仍然是一个非常好的智能手机。但是，一些小的不足阻碍了它的步伐。例如，缺乏等级为IP67的防护能力，不能防止水和灰尘进入手机。我们也希望该机有一个可以支持更多频段的快速LTE模块。一个或几个频段的缺失，阻碍了它成为一个真正的环球使用的手机的可能。与高端竞品相比，Wi-Fi传输速度并不是很让人满意。

除了我们测试的这台支持单SIM卡的机型，诺基亚也有双SIM卡型号可供选择。而128 GB存储空间的机型也会很快发布。截止到目前，相关信息还无法在诺基亚德文网站上获取。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Nokia 8 - 10/19/2017 v6 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

88%

Keyboard

71 / 75 → 94%

Pointing Device

90%

Connectivity

48 / 60 → 80%

Weight

91%

Battery

93%

Display

83%

Games Performance

64 / 63 → 100%

Application Performance

68 / 70 → 98%

Temperature

85%

Noise

100%

Audio

71 / 91 → 78%

Camera

75%

Average

79%

87%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 诺基亚 8 智能手机简短评测

Manuel Masiero, 2017-11-16 (Update: 2017-11-16)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Nokia 8 audio analysis

Apple iPhone 8 audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S8 audio analysis

Pros

Cons

More articles related to this device

Price comparison