奥普A76评测--光影下的美丽手机
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77.7 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Oppo A76 SD 680, Adreno 610 | 189 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.56" | 1612x720 | |
| 80.5 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2022 | Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2 | 195 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2400x1080 | |
| 80.6 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | Motorola Moto G41 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 178 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.40" | 2400x1080 | |
| 79.6 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2 | 203 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.60" | 2400x1080 |
箱子和设备 - 高档次的设计
笔记本 奥普A74去年，但我们不得不批评其缓慢的SoC和缺乏NFC。现在的Oppo A76是继任者。然而，看一下设备清单，这两款智能手机只有很少的共同点。
OPPA76在外观上也有所不同，提供浅蓝色或黑色的磨砂背面，右侧的待机按钮位置较低，指纹传感器集成在那里。另一方面，从正面看，你可以看到更多相似之处。总的来说，这款智能手机结构坚固，但对屏幕的中等压力足以使画面变形。
在功能方面，这款手机可以拥有4GB的内存和128GB的快速UFS 2.2存储；其他存储版本目前还没有，至少在欧洲没有。OPPO A76中包含NFC，这在这个价格范围内还不是理所当然的。
microSD读卡器是独立的，为这个级别提供典型的速度。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo A76 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Motorola Moto G41 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 仅限LTE，但支持NFC
Oppo A76目前没有像前代那样的5G模式，所以你必须用LTE作为最快的移动技术来解决。有几个频段可供选择，但你必须在出国前检查你是否能使用当地的移动互联网。
Wi-Fi模块支持Wi-Fi 5作为最快的标准，这在这个价格范围内是很常见的。然而，Oppo A76在传输速度的稳定性方面存在问题：在我们用参考路由器华硕ROG GT-AXE11000进行的测试中，它的传输速度波动很大，平均而言，它不太接近同价位的智能手机。我们已经注意到这种行为在 奥普A74观察到的。
基于Android 11的ColorOS 11.1已经预装在智能手机上。在印度，基于Android 12的ColorOS 12的测试版已经为Oppo A76发布，所以可以推测这个版本也将来到欧洲。一般来说，制造商每3个月会谈论2个新的Android 版本和安全更新。
90赫兹的屏幕使操作感觉相当流畅，但只有在后台运行的应用程序不太多的情况下，因为SoC几乎没有提供任何性能储备。指纹传感器位于外壳右侧的待机按钮上。它的工作相当可靠，但需要一秒钟才能解锁智能手机。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A22 5G | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A22 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto G41 | |
| Oppo A76 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto G41 | |
| Oppo A76 | |
照相机--小编提供
我们在Oppo的A76中寻找广角摄像头是徒劳的。与许多其他型号不同，只有1300万像素的主摄像头和一个用于人像模式下模糊效果的额外摄像头。因此，相机系统的灵活性不大。
与前代产品不同，主镜头不再是像素比对相机，因此感光度也较低。相应地，黑暗环境中的照片亮度不高，看起来有斑点，只有少数细节可见。白天的HDR功能是令人信服的，但细节的多样性相当平庸，大面积有明显的像素图案。主摄像头在实验室中的文字显示有时会有问题，但我们喜欢图片边缘的清晰度。
视频可以以30帧/秒的速度录制，自动对焦和曝光反应相当快，通常也很准确。
总的来说，对于这个价格范围来说，这是一个体面的相机，对快照很有用。然而，有更高要求的用户将不得不花更多钱购买更高质量的智能手机。
前置摄像头的分辨率为800万像素。第一印象是体面的，但你不应该把照片放大太多。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
显示 - 快速而明亮
凭借其90-Hz的IPS显示屏，Oppo A76的刷新率领先于其他许多同价位的智能手机。然而，在分辨率方面，你不得不使用720p，这仍然是可以的，但使显示屏看起来比通常的1080p屏幕更洗练一些。
然而，大约570cd/m²的最大亮度是相当不错的，所以你也可以在更明亮的日子里在户外使用这款智能手机。屏幕良好的色彩还原度也令人欣喜。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 569 cd/m²
Contrast: 1138:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.16 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.177
| Oppo A76 IPS, 1612x720, 6.6" | Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G TFT-LCD, 2400x1080, 6.6" | Motorola Moto G41 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Samsung Galaxy A22 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -28% | 78% | 15% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41 ? | 50 ? -22% | 9 ? 78% | 32 ? 22% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 34.8 ? -34% | 6 ? 77% | 24 ? 8% |
| PWM Frequency | 240.4 | 147 ? | ||
| Screen | -45% | 4% | -62% | |
| Brightness middle | 569 | 504 -11% | 713 25% | 415 -27% |
| Brightness | 562 | 499 -11% | 712 27% | 378 -33% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 91 1% | 91 1% | 76 -16% |
| Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.72 -44% | 0.26 48% | |
| Contrast | 1138 | 700 -38% | 1596 40% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.16 | 3.3 -53% | 1.1 49% | 5.41 -150% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.37 | 6 -78% | 2.39 29% | 9.77 -190% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 4.1 -128% | 3.7 -106% | 4.8 -167% |
| Gamma | 2.177 101% | 2.28 96% | 2.264 97% | 2.348 94% |
| CCT | 6784 96% | 7041 92% | 7373 88% | 7748 84% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -37% /
-42% | 41% /
23% | -24% /
-47% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命--动力不足的Oppo A76
凭借其 高通骁龙680如果不是小米和三星的5G手机，Oppo A76将与竞争对手平起平坐，这表明这个价格可能有更多的动力。图形单元只能在屏幕测试中被说服，即在屏幕的低原始分辨率下；否则，一些竞争对手在这里也是领先的。
然而，令人高兴的是，Oppo安装了快速的UFS 2.2存储，因此至少可以帮助系统在加载或启动应用程序时有点快。然而，总的来说，你不得不期待，在后台运行更复杂的应用程序时，系统只能非常缓慢地运行，或者有时根本无法运行。至少最大的机箱温度保持在限制范围内。
单声道扬声器在媒体播放方面做得很好，听起来没有太令人不快的高音，而且声音很大，足以让一个中等大小的房间充满声音。然而，你用耳机自然能得到更好的声音。在我们的测试中，通过3.5毫米端口或蓝牙5.0的连接工作没有问题。目前所有的aptX编解码器、SBC、AAC和LDAC都可用于无线声音传输。
Oppo A76可以通过附带的充电器以高达33瓦的功率进行充电。这款手机需要大约一个半小时才能充满电。在我们的WLAN测试中，运行时间比许多对手略高，只有 Galaxy A22 5G提供了更多的耐力。
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oppo A76 | |
| Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G41 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A22 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (4.6 - 17, n=15) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 166, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oppo A76 | |
| Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G41 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A22 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (5.1 - 9.8, n=15) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oppo A76 | |
| Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G41 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A22 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2.7 - 11, n=15) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=208, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oppo A76 | |
| Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G41 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A22 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1.4 - 3.3, n=15) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=208, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo A76 | Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G | Motorola Moto G41 | Samsung Galaxy A22 5G | Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -11% | -64% | -57% | -7% | 87% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 980.7 | 964 -2% | 298.5 -70% | 300.5 -69% | 728 ? -26% | 1887 ? 92% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 711.7 | 471 -34% | 172.3 -76% | 210.3 -70% | 527 ? -26% | 1471 ? 107% |
| Random Read 4KB | 174.7 | 148.8 -15% | 86.9 -50% | 118 -32% | 191.7 ? 10% | 278 ? 59% |
| Random Write 4KB | 162.7 | 171.8 6% | 64.4 -60% | 69.2 -57% | 185.8 ? 14% | 311 ? 91% |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.5 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Oppo A76 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Samsung Galaxy A22 5G | |
| Oppo A76 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=209, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G41 | |
Pros
Cons
结论--Oppo手机可以勉强胜出
从内存配置来看，Oppo A76比其前辈略微便宜一些 奥普A74然而，有些东西是不同的：有一个不那么感光的摄像头，不再有微距镜头，而且制造商现在使用的是IPS屏幕，相当明亮，色彩丰富，没有PWM，刷新率为90 Hz。
然而，与其他制造商的类似价格的智能手机相比，我们注意到更多的缺点：没有超广角摄像头，系统性能相对较低，Wi-Fi信号不稳定，720p屏幕在分辨率方面无法说服人。好的一面是良好的运行时间和快速存储。
Oppo A76缺乏某种额外的功能。尽管如此，它是一款坚实的、廉价的中档手机，拥有90赫兹的屏幕。
总的来说，Oppo A76不能真正在其竞争对手中脱颖而出，特别是 小米Poco M4 Pro 5G，特别是在非常相似的价格下提供了相当多的功能。三星，也有一个很好的价格标签，即 Galaxy A22 5G- 这是一款令人信服的、价格低廉的中端手机，它最多只能被其不太明亮的屏幕所阻挡。
价格和可用性
OPPO A76可在许多在线零售商处购买，在测试时最低价格为230欧元起。另外，amazon.de和我们的借阅者cyberport.de都有这款智能手机的报价。
Oppo A76
- 05/28/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
