Notebookcheck Logo

小米Poco M4 Pro 5G评测--价格极其低廉的智能手机的升级版

重塑品牌。

Poco M4 Pro 5G是欧洲版的Redmi Note 11 5G。这款230欧元（约260美元）的小米智能手机配备了90-Hz的IPS屏幕，50-MP的摄像头，大量的内部存储和新的SoC。阅读我们的评论，了解这款价格低廉的设备还能提供什么。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

小米Poco M4 Pro 5G是Poco M3 Pro 5G的继任者。 鹏鹞M3 Pro 5G.M4 Pro 5G与Redmi Note 11 5G有很多相似之处。与前辈相比，M4有点大，而且更重，因为它有一个更大的屏幕。M4还配备了一个更现代的SoC，一个额外的扬声器，以及一个新的相机系统。

Poco M4 5G的价格比前代产品高出30欧元（约34美元）。配备4GB内存和64GB内部存储器的机型现在的价格是230欧元230欧元（约合人民币260元）。配备6GB内存或128GB内部存储器的机型--我们的评测设备--价格为250欧元（约合295美元）。

Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Poco M Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 810 8 x 2 - 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP2, Core: 1068 MHz
Memory
6 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.60 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 399 PPI, Capacitive, 10 multi touch points, 240 Hz touch sampling rate, TFT-LCD, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 114.99 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: Audio Jack (3.5 mm), USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity, Accelerometer, Magnetometer, Orientation, Gyroscope, OTG, IR-Blaster, FM-Radio
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.75 x 163.56 x 75.78
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8) + 8 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.2, 119°); 1080p-Video (60 FPS); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.45); 1080p-Video (30 FPS)
Additional features
Speakers: Mono, Keyboard: Onscreen, 33W-Charger, USB-Cabel (Type-A to Type-C), SIM-Tool, Silicon Case, Sticker, Documentations, MIUI 12.5 for Poco, 12 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1), BeiDou (B1), SBAS; Head-SAR: 0.594 W/kg, Body-SAR: 0.999 W/kg; DRM Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
195 g
Price
250 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Likely Competitors

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
80.5 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2022
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2		195 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2400x1080
80.5 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2		190 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"2400x1080
80 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
Vivo Y72 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2		193 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.58"2408x1080
82.4 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
Oppo A74 5G
SD 480, Adreno 619		190 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
79.6 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2		203 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.60"2400x1080

小米Poco M4 Pro 5G的背面是区别于Redmi Note 11 5G的少数几个地方之一。M4 Pro 5G有不同的配色（强力黑、Poco黄和酷蓝），背面有Poco标志。由于1.7毫米的摄像头凸起，在没有保护壳的情况下，Poco M4在平面上会摇晃。

这款小米智能手机看起来相当体面。屏幕由康宁大猩猩3号玻璃保护。中框和背面都是由塑料制成。后者的表面有纹理，可以增加抓地力，有助于隐藏指纹。不过，值得一提的是，在不在背面留下任何残留物的情况下去除IMEI贴纸将是相当具有挑战性的。

建造质量处于可接受的水平。不过，后盖和中框之间有微小的缝隙，而且电源按钮感觉相当粘稠。Poco M4 Pro 5G不会弯曲或扭曲，但对屏幕施加很大压力会导致波纹效应。这款智能手机既不防水也不防尘。电池是不可拆卸的。

Size Comparison

❌
167.2 mm 76.4 mm 9 mm 203 g164 mm 75.3 mm 8.5 mm 193 g163.56 mm 75.78 mm 8.75 mm 195 g162.9 mm 74.7 mm 8.4 mm 190 g161.81 mm 75.34 mm 8.92 mm 190 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - Poco M4 Pro 5G带有调频无线电接收器和红外辐射器

小米Poco M4 Pro 5G提供良好的连接选项。USB 2.0端口支持OTG功能，但它不能用于视频输出。音频插孔用于声音输出，但它也可以作为集成调频广播接收器的天线。广播应用有一个可分类的电台列表，还可以录制广播节目。

顶部：扬声器、麦克风、红外辐射器
顶部：扬声器、麦克风、红外辐射器
左侧。卡槽
左侧。卡槽
右侧。音量摇杆，电源按钮
右侧。音量摇杆，电源按钮
底部。扬声器、USB-C端口、麦克风、音频插孔
底部。扬声器、USB-C端口、麦克风、音频插孔

读卡器

那些需要更多存储空间的人可以在智能手机上插入一张microSD卡。外部存储不能被格式化为内部存储器。应用程序数据不能存储在SD卡上。

在我们的跨平台SD卡基准测试中，Poco M4 Pro实现了一个体面的读取速度。然而，其他设备使用我们的参考级SD卡（Angelbird AV Pro V60）可以达到更高的读取速度。当复制数据到SD卡时，Poco M4 Pro 5G的速度非常慢。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
44 MB/s +184%
Oppo A74 5G
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
30.03 MB/s +94%
Vivo Y72 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
16.1 MB/s +4%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
15.47 MB/s
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13.66 MB/s -12%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32 (25-46.5)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø28.8 (15.3-45.8)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø75.5 (58.6-78.9)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø70.7 (11.8-76.8)

软件--小米智能手机的MIUI for Poco

Poco M4 Pro 5G运行Android 11，有一个专有的UI，被称为MIUI 12.5。小米承诺将更新到Android 12。没有其他软件支持的承诺。安全补丁最后一次更新是在2021年11月。

Poco的MIUI启动器看起来很像普通标准的MIUI启动器。不幸的是，用户界面上有广告，还有很多第三方应用程序，这些都可以卸载。没有DRM认证。

通信与GNSS - Poco配备5G调制解调器

Poco M4 Pro 5G支持目前所有的蜂窝通信标准，以及蓝牙5.1、NFC、Wi-Fi 5和5G Sub6。对于这个价格范围内的设备，小米智能手机支持很多频段。

不幸的是，我们无法进行任何Wi-Fi基准测试，因为Poco智能手机多次未能连接到我们的参考级路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX12。我们将等待智能手机和路由器的更新，并尝试执行我们的Wi-Fi基准测试，然后，如果需要的话。

GPS测试：室内
在室内
GPS测试。室外
户外活动

Poco M4 Pro 5G即使在室内也能快速而准确地获取用户的位置。然而，小米智能手机的单频GNSS模块并不是地理定位的最佳选择。

为了确定我们的评测设备在导航方面的准确性，我们带着它去骑车。这款低价的智能手机并没有非常准确地绘制出我们所走的路线。然而，它对于偶尔的导航来说已经足够好了。

GNSS自行车骑行。环湖骑行
GNSS自行车骑行。环湖骑行
GNSS自行车骑行。拐弯处
GNSS自行车骑行。拐弯处
GNSS自行车骑行。骑行概述
GNSS自行车骑行。骑行概述

电话和通话质量

只要靠近耳朵，Poco M4 Pro 5G的声音就很好听。然而，用户听起来有点鼻音。由于有主动噪音控制，在繁忙的街道上交谈没有问题。然而，总是有一些背景噪音。在许多人同时说话的地方，有时会出现短暂的中断。在扬声器模式下，有一些混响，但用户的声音即使在离手机中等距离也能被很好地接收。也就是说，用户的声音偶尔会在很短的时间内掉线。

Poco M4 Pro是一款混合SIM卡智能手机，这意味着它可以使用两张SIM卡，或同时使用一张SIM卡和一张microSD卡，不支持eSIM功能。支持VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话，但没有办法创建SIP账户。

相机 - 更少的镜头，更高的质量？

用Poco M4 Pro 5G拍摄的自拍照
用Poco M4 Pro 5G拍摄的自拍照

与Poco M3 Pro相比，前置摄像头的分辨率提高了一倍。它能以四种不同的长宽比（1:1、3:4、9:16和9:20）拍摄照片，并能以高达1080p30的速度录制视频。图像质量对于社交媒体和信息传递应用程序来说足够好。然而，图像显得有点过度锐化。

主摄像头有相当大的变化。主传感器现在可以拍摄50万像素的照片，与前置摄像头的长宽比相同。这些照片还算不错，但它们往往看起来有点冲淡和模糊。当对准远处的物体时，自动对焦偶尔会失灵。支持10倍数码变焦，但超过5倍变焦时，质量就会明显下降。超广角镜头能产生体面的图像，具有良好的景深，但在边缘有色差。此外，失真校正应该被禁用，因为它可能导致非常严重的失真，这是相当可惜的。

用主摄像头可以录制视频，最高可达1080p60。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light

在受控的照明条件下，Poco M4 Pro 5G的主摄像头产生的照片看起来很自然。我们的测试图再现得非常好，但边缘有一些模糊。

ColorChecker
6.5 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
5 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
3 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G: 4.95 ∆E min: 1.58 - max: 9.88 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
55 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76.2 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G: 47.08 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 93.69 ∆E

配件和保修

Poco M4 Pro 5G配备了一个33瓦的电源适配器。
Poco M4 Pro 5G配备了一个33瓦的电源适配器。

Poco M4 Pro 5G配备了一个33W的模块化电源适配器，一条USB线（Type-A转Type-C），一个透明硅胶壳，贴纸和一个SIM卡拆卸工具。小米没有为Poco M4 Pro 5G提供任何定制配件。

制造商提供12个月的保修。卖家的保修不受影响。

输入设备和处理 - 由于90/240赫兹的高响应性

小米Poco M4 Pro 5G的电容式触摸屏可以同时识别多达十个输入，采样率为240赫兹。结合90赫兹的刷新率，这款智能手机感觉反应非常灵敏，这在这个价格范围内并不常见。出厂时已在显示屏上安装了屏幕保护膜。

谷歌的GBoard作为主键盘。然而，它可以被Play Store中的任何其他键盘取代。额外的输入手势，如双击显示屏以唤醒它，在实践中相当有用。单手模式也被包括在内。

指纹传感器被集成到电源按钮上。它能快速、可靠地解锁智能手机。它可以被配置为通过长按、双按或双击的方式在设置菜单中执行其他功能。此外，还支持面部识别，但其安全性较低。

显示器 - Poco M4 Pro 5G的无闪烁90-Hz IPS面板

像素排列
像素排列

与前代产品相比，小米Poco M4 Pro 5G的屏幕尺寸略有增长。不过，由于分辨率没有变化（2400x1080像素），像素密度仍然很高。启用环境光传感器后，亮度现在达到了500cd/m²以上的峰值，这是一个重大的改进。在禁用环境光传感器的情况下，亮度的峰值约为420cd/m²。在APL50测试中，屏幕显示的是大小相同的黑白方块交替的图案，我们在屏幕中央测得的亮度为512cd/m²。

不支持HRD，考虑到最大亮度，这并不令人惊讶。然而，Poco M4 Pro配备了无闪烁面板，这应该使阅读电子书的眼睛更加舒适。最低亮度是这里的另一个优点，低蓝光模式也是如此。

由于90-Hz的刷新率，小米智能手机感觉非常流畅。说到这里，对比度和黑值都相当差。

517
cd/m²		507
cd/m²		470
cd/m²
519
cd/m²		504
cd/m²		475
cd/m²
517
cd/m²		509
cd/m²		476
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 519 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 499.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.76 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 504 cd/m²
Contrast: 700:1 (Black: 0.72 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
TFT-LCD, 2400x1080, 6.6"		Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5"		Vivo Y72 5G
IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6"		Oppo A74 5G
LTPS, 2400x1080, 6.5"		Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.6"
Screen
60%
-2%
45%
-1%
Brightness middle
504
427
-15%
419
-17%
582
15%
415
-18%
Brightness
499
404
-19%
384
-23%
573
15%
378
-24%
Brightness Distribution
91
87
-4%
87
-4%
94
3%
76
-16%
Black Level *
0.72
0.17
76%
0.7
3%
0.35
51%
0.26
64%
Contrast
700
2512
259%
599
-14%
1663
138%
1596
128%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.3
1.5
55%
3.32
-1%
1.8
45%
5.41
-64%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6
2.1
65%
5.06
16%
3.4
43%
9.77
-63%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.1
1.6
61%
3
27%
2
51%
4.8
-17%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.3 96%
2.203 100%
2.26 97%
2.348 94%
CCT
7041 92%
6652 98%
7236 90%
6736 96%
7748 84%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

我们的Calman测试显示，在Livid模式和色温设置为暖色调的情况下，色彩和灰度表现可以接受。然而，前代产品的色彩还原性略好。有一个轻微的洋红色偏移，这在日常使用中并不证明是令人讨厌的。

灰度（模式：鲜艳，温度：温暖，色彩空间：DCI-P3）。
灰度（模式：鲜艳，温度：温暖，色彩空间：DCI-P3）。
色彩精度（模式：鲜艳，温度：温暖，色彩空间：DCI-P3）。
色彩精度（模式：鲜艳，温度：温暖，色彩空间：DCI-P3）。
色彩空间覆盖（模式：鲜艳，温度：温暖，色彩空间：DCI-P3）。
色彩空间覆盖（模式：鲜艳，温度：温暖，色彩空间：DCI-P3）。
饱和度（模式：鲜艳，温度：温暖，色彩空间：DCI-P3）。
饱和度（模式：鲜艳，温度：温暖，色彩空间：DCI-P3）。

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
34.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.8 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25.6 ms rise
↘ 24.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

在阴天，屏幕充满了反光，但仍然可以阅读。在夏天，鉴于Poco M4 Pro 5G的低亮度，其显示屏将难以阅读。

视角非常好。我们没有观察到任何混浊、发光或重影现象。不过，在非常尖锐的角度，亮度会下降。

Poco M4 Pro 5G室外版
Poco M4 Pro 5G室外版
Poco M4 Pro 5G的可视角度
Poco M4 Pro 5G的可视角度

性能 - Poco M4 Pro 5G中的Dimensity 810

小米Poco M4 Pro 5G搭载了 联发科Dimensity 810.这里的命名相当混乱，因为Dimensity 810并不是Dimensity 800的真正继任者。 Dimensity 800或 800U.相反，它是Dimensity 700的继任者。 迪米特700因为它提供了相同的GPU。

Dimensity 810的CPU由两个集群组成（两个Cortex-A72核心，频率高达2.4赫兹，6个Cortex-A55，频率高达1.8GHz）。在游戏基准测试和Geekbench中，Dimensity 810都比其前辈快。

联发科没有提供很多关于iGPU的具体信息，但它仍然将其列为 ARM Mali-G57 MP2.不过，小米声称，该iGPU的时钟频率可以达到1068 MHz，而Dimensity 700的iGPU工作频率为700至950 MHz。在屏幕外的基准测试中，Poco M4 Pro 5G的表现比配备Dimensity 700的设备好16%至21%。在屏幕基准测试中，其领先优势较小。

Geekbench 5.5 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | Antutu v9 | AnTuTu v8 | VRMark | AImark | Basemark GPU 1.2 | BaseMark OS II
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
598 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
454 Points -24%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
565 Points -6%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
520 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
564 Points -6%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
523 Points -13%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
598 Points 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  (598 - 598, n=2)
598 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=175, last 2 years)
1040 Points +74%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1809 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1347 Points -26%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1772 Points -2%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1713 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1712 Points -5%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
2143 Points +18%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
1778 Points -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  (1774 - 1809, n=2)
1792 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=175, last 2 years)
3474 Points +92%
Vulkan Score 5.5 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1600 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1397 Points -13%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1474 Points -8%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
926 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1376 Points -14%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
1564 Points -2%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
1575 Points -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  (1539 - 1600, n=2)
1570 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (79 - 21892, n=46, last 2 years)
8316 Points +420%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1612 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1346 Points -17%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1493 Points -7%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1099 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1392 Points -14%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
1987 Points +23%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
2089 Points +30%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  (1567 - 1612, n=2)
1590 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (459 - 18407, n=41, last 2 years)
8292 Points +414%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9402 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9100 Points -3%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
6783 Points -28%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7016 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
7434 Points -21%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  (8100 - 9402, n=2)
8751 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13174 Points +40%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3777 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3149 Points -17%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3449 Points -9%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3509 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3357 Points -11%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4497 Points +19%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
4299 Points +14%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
3777 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (812 - 7285, n=25, last 2 years)
4239 Points +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3846 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3319 Points -14%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3425 Points -11%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3662 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3442 Points -11%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4722 Points +23%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
4609 Points +20%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
3846 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (756 - 9451, n=25, last 2 years)
4795 Points +25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3553 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2669 Points -25%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3535 Points -1%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3061 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3090 Points -13%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3855 Points +8%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3479 Points -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
3553 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4349, n=25, last 2 years)
3303 Points -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3965 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3277 Points -17%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3516 Points -11%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3625 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3565 Points -10%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4259 Points +7%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
4206 Points +6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
3965 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 23024, n=72, last 2 years)
11215 Points +183%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
4014 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3435 Points -14%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3612 Points -10%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3825 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3619 Points -10%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4497 Points +12%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
4457 Points +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
4014 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (840 - 45492, n=72, last 2 years)
19933 Points +397%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3801 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2824 Points -26%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3216 Points -15%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3064 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3389 Points -11%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3593 Points -5%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3512 Points -8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
3801 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=72, last 2 years)
5021 Points +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2714 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2411 Points -11%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2419 Points -11%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2420 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2360 Points -13%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3288 Points +21%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3146 Points +16%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  (2652 - 2714, n=2)
2683 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=69, last 2 years)
3014 Points +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2546 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2313 Points -9%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2222 Points -13%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2287 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2217 Points -13%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3145 Points +24%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3063 Points +20%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  (2529 - 2546, n=2)
2538 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=69, last 2 years)
3179 Points +25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3529 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2829 Points -20%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3508 Points -1%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3037 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3047 Points -14%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3909 Points +11%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3473 Points -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  (3195 - 3529, n=2)
3362 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=69, last 2 years)
3259 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2770 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2449 Points -12%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2476 Points -11%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2563 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2463 Points -11%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3410 Points +23%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3262 Points +18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  (2708 - 2770, n=2)
2739 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 23762, n=163, last 2 years)
8239 Points +197%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2570 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2336 Points -9%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2308 Points -10%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2448 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2290 Points -11%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3353 Points +30%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3201 Points +25%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  (2535 - 2570, n=2)
2553 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 40163, n=163, last 2 years)
12402 Points +383%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3804 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2948 Points -23%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3325 Points -13%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3068 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3350 Points -12%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3626 Points -5%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3497 Points -8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  (3556 - 3804, n=2)
3680 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 10632, n=163, last 2 years)
4754 Points +25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2489 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2188 Points -12%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2280 Points -8%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2270 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2244 Points -10%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3165 Points +27%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3027 Points +22%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  (2489 - 2624, n=2)
2557 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6635, n=68, last 2 years)
2791 Points +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2396 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2136 Points -11%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2140 Points -11%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2186 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2141 Points -11%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3139 Points +31%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3029 Points +26%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  (2396 - 2576, n=2)
2486 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 7971, n=68, last 2 years)
3021 Points +26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2882 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2391 Points -17%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2956 Points +3%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2622 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2698 Points -6%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3258 Points +13%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3022 Points +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  (2806 - 2882, n=2)
2844 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 4198, n=68, last 2 years)
2684 Points -7%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1235 Points
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1102 Points -11%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
980 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1094 Points -11%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
1631 Points +32%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  (1235 - 1326, n=2)
1281 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=112, last 2 years)
2816 Points +128%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1210 Points
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1083 Points -10%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
969 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1074 Points -11%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
1620 Points +34%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  (1210 - 1293, n=2)
1252 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 25785, n=188, last 2 years)
7925 Points +555%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
360 Points
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
321 Points -11%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
292 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
100 Points -72%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  (360 - 361, n=2)
361 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=194, last 2 years)
2182 Points +506%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
348 Points
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
312 Points -10%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
285 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1073 Points +208%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  (348 - 348, n=2)
348 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=193, last 2 years)
2166 Points +522%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
56 fps
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
51 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
52 fps -7%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
60 fps +7%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
59 fps +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
56 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23 - 166, n=173, last 2 years)
86.8 fps +55%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
66 fps
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
55 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
61 fps -8%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
86 fps +30%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
83 fps +26%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
66 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=173, last 2 years)
297 fps +350%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
36 fps
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
32 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
33 fps -8%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
46 fps +28%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
48 fps +33%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
36 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 166, n=173, last 2 years)
76.3 fps +112%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
40 fps
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
34 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
37 fps -7%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
50 fps +25%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
51 fps +28%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
40 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12 - 502, n=173, last 2 years)
175.8 fps +340%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
23 fps
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
21 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
21 fps -9%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
30 fps +30%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
31 fps +35%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
23 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 166, n=173, last 2 years)
67 fps +191%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
26 fps
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
22 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
24 fps -8%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
34 fps +31%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
35 fps +35%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
26 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.3 - 365, n=173, last 2 years)
124.9 fps +380%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
13 fps
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
12 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
11 fps -15%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
17 fps +31%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
18 fps +38%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
13 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 154, n=174, last 2 years)
49.7 fps +282%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
16 fps
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
13 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
14 fps -12%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
20 fps +25%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
20 fps +25%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
16 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 216, n=173, last 2 years)
75.2 fps +370%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
15 fps
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
14 fps -7%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
13 fps -13%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
13 fps -13%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
20 fps +33%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
20 fps +33%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  (15 - 31, n=2)
23 fps +53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 166, n=206, last 2 years)
50.9 fps +239%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
17 fps
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
14 fps -18%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
15 fps -12%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
19 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
15 fps -12%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
22 fps +29%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
22 fps +29%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  (17 - 17, n=2)
17 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 321, n=206, last 2 years)
85.3 fps +402%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9.3 fps
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
8.8 fps -5%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
8.4 fps -10%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8.1 fps -13%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
12 fps +29%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
12 fps +29%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  (9.3 - 19, n=2)
14.2 fps +53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years)
39.3 fps +323%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
6.2 fps
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
5.5 fps -11%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
5.6 fps -10%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6.7 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5.5 fps -11%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
8.2 fps +32%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
8 fps +29%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  (6.2 - 6.2, n=2)
6.2 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years)
34.4 fps +455%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
353908 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
287506 Points -19%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
353908 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)
810694 Points +129%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
300496 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
249843 Points -17%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
297875 Points -1%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
331094 Points +10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
300496 Points 0%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2970 Score
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3279 Score +10%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3178 Score +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
2970 Score 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years)
5819 Score +96%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9008 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
12011 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8794 Points -2%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
37055 Points +311%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
13522 Points +50%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
9008 Points 0%
Basemark GPU 1.2
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
25.78 (8.99min - 41.58max) fps
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
39.26 fps +52%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
37.7 fps +46%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
25.8 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.08 - 382, n=61, last 2 years)
99.2 fps +285%
OpenGL Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
24.03 (7.17min - 39.18max) fps
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
34.61 fps +44%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
32.89 fps +37%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
24 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.3 - 284, n=58, last 2 years)
83.5 fps +247%
1280x720 Vulkan Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
187.8 (92.15min - 891.63max) fps
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
200.2 fps +7%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
200.2 fps +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
187.8 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70.3 - 1700, n=60, last 2 years)
464 fps +147%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
29.57 (10.34min - 49.42max) fps
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
34.21 fps +16%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
34.42 fps +16%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
29.6 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.75 - 346, n=60, last 2 years)
103.8 fps +251%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
25.82 (9.11min - 45.85max) fps
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
30.7 fps +19%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
30.52 fps +18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
25.8 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 303, n=60, last 2 years)
86.2 fps +234%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3268 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3107 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3005 Points -8%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3350 Points +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
3268 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)
6499 Points +99%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
6361 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
6148 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6486 Points +2%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
6052 Points -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
6361 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)
10346 Points +63%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
4589 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
4264 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
4473 Points -3%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
4877 Points +6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
4589 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)
7058 Points +54%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2929 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2626 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2398 Points -18%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3161 Points +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
2929 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)
17998 Points +514%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1334 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1353 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1172 Points -12%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
1349 Points +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
  ()
1334 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)
1578 Points +18%

当涉及到浏览器基准测试时，Poco M4 Pro 5G在我们的比较表中占据了第一位。总而言之，它取得了不错的成绩。

Performance Rating | Jetstream 2 | JetStream 1.1 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Smartphone -1!
93.5 pt
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
50.4 pt
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
49.4 pt
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
46.2 pt
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
40.2 pt
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
39.9 pt
Realme 7 5G
26.2 pt
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points +184%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
43.83 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810 ()
43.8 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
38.21 Points -13%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G (Chrome 87)
36.83 Points -16%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101)
35.97 Points -18%
Realme 7 5G (Chrome 68)
28.09 Points -36%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
84.8 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810 ()
84.8 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
78.4 Points -8%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G (Chrome 87)
69.7 Points -18%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101)
69.5 Points -18%
Realme 7 5G (Chrome 86)
51.4 Points -39%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min +262%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
39.8 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810 ()
39.8 runs/min 0%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G (Chome 87)
37.9 runs/min -5%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chome 92)
37.2 runs/min -7%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101)
36 runs/min -10%
Realme 7 5G (Chome 86)
26.3 runs/min -34%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
150.2 Points +142%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
62 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810 ()
62 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
58 Points -6%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G (Chrome 87)
56 Points -10%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101)
54 Points -13%
Realme 7 5G (Chrome 86)
45 Points -27%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points +103%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
19010 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
16870 Points -11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810 (14427 - 19010, n=2)
16719 Points -12%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101)
15976 Points -16%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G (Chrome 87)
14751 Points -22%
Realme 7 5G (Chrome 86)
9999 Points -47%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Realme 7 5G (Chrome 86)
4695 ms * -95%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G (Chrome 87)
3490 ms * -45%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101)
3387 ms * -41%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
2543 ms * -6%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
2410 ms *
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810 ()
2410 ms * -0%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * +37%

* ... smaller is better

就像它的前辈一样，Poco M4 Pro 5G配备了相当昂贵和相对快速的UFS 2.2存储。

Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5GXiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5GVivo Y72 5GOppo A74 5GSamsung Galaxy A22 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
4%
-21%
-31%
-51%
6%
120%
Sequential Read 256KB
964
954
-1%
956
-1%
492.6
-49%
300.5
-69%
728 ?(303 - 1038, n=71)
-24%
1894 ?(226 - 4512, n=197, last 2 years)
96%
Sequential Write 256KB
471
489.1
4%
13.6
-97%
265.3
-44%
210.3
-55%
527 ?(103.2 - 903, n=71)
12%
1476 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=197, last 2 years)
213%
Random Read 4KB
148.8
155.8
5%
164.4
10%
153.2
3%
118
-21%
191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71)
29%
278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=197, last 2 years)
87%
Random Write 4KB
171.8
186.1
8%
179.4
4%
115.8
-33%
69.2
-60%
185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71)
8%
312 ?(9.4 - 753, n=197, last 2 years)
82%

游戏 - 高达90 FPS，但有限制

芯片 ARM Mali-G57 MP2是一个低端图形芯片，只能在低设置下运行现代的高要求游戏。Poco M4 Pro 5G提供的性能改进并没有以任何方式改变这种情况。在这里，即使是Armajet也被限制在30FSP。不过，像《死亡扳机》这样的老游戏可以以90FPS的速度运行。

死亡扳机2
死亡扳机2
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
氩氦刀
氩氦刀
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø30.1 (29-31)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G; Dead Trigger 2; 1.8.9: Ø90 (86-91)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.7.0: Ø40 (39-42)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 1.7.0: Ø40 (39-41)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.7.0: Ø30 (29-31)

排放--现在有了立体声扬声器

温度

GFXBench。T-Rex (OpenGL ES 2.0)
T-Rex
GFXBench。曼哈顿（OpenGL ES 3.1）
曼哈顿

小米Poco M4 Pro 5G从不发热或节流。

Max. Load
 32.1 °C31 °C34.7 °C 
 31.4 °C30.6 °C34.6 °C 
 31 °C29.8 °C32 °C 
Maximum: 34.7 °C
Average: 31.9 °C
29.3 °C30.5 °C31.4 °C
28.9 °C30 °C31.4 °C
28.9 °C29.3 °C30.8 °C
Maximum: 31.4 °C
Average: 30.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  28.7 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
01234567Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø2.16 (2.15-2.17)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø2.22 (2.21-2.24)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø0.708 (0.701-0.73)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø7.38 (7.36-7.39)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.49 (7.46-7.51)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.59 (2.57-2.59)

发言人

小米Poco M4 Pro 5G配备了两个扬声器。如果其中一个扬声器被覆盖，这可能是相当实用的。M4 Pro 5G的声音和它的前辈差不多，也就是有点闷闷的。

有一个3.5毫米的音频插孔，本底噪声很低（SNR：85.74 dBFS）。几乎所有常见的蓝牙编解码器都支持（SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+、LDAC、LHDC V1-4）。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.9332526.426.13123.723.54026.926.85031.732.36323.228.78021.222.41001826.412513.930.716016.141.420011.740.925012.246.73159.350.64009.153.35009.259.76309.758.980010.663.5100010.970.9125011.970.616001271.2200012.674.4250012.776.7315012.179.2400012.682.4500013.382.9630013.278.6800013.674.31000013.7731250013.670.61600013.666.3SPL24.489.3N0.569.3median 12.6median 70.6Delta1.610.833.740.636.13726.930.432.430.234.332.62726.218.919.618.424.217.83415.143.714.548.112.351.411.355.79.759.211.564.914.565.815.168.115.371.112.470.811.874.610.974.611.274.415.266.717.775.82080.118.677.217.169.918.166.118.369.921.856.628.286.10.963.3median 15.1median 66.73.28.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5GVivo Y72 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Vivo Y72 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命--Poco M4 Pro 5G配备5000毫安时电池

能源消耗

Poco M4 Pro 5G的耗电量在闲置时略低，但在负载时略高，这在很大程度上是由于更明亮的面板，因为在调整亮度时，电池运行时间往往略好。

使用附带的33W充电器，小米智能手机可以在68分钟内完全充电。50%的电池电量可在30分钟内实现，80%的标记可在48分钟内破解。不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.18 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.51 / 1.96 / 2.01 Watt
Load midlight 3.86 / 5.62 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
5000 mAh		Oppo A74 5G
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
5000 mAh		Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-4%
7%
-6%
0%
-35%
Idle Minimum *
0.51
0.69
-35%
0.63
-24%
0.9
-76%
0.51 ?()
-0%
0.883 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=161, last 2 years)
-73%
Idle Average *
1.96
2.04
-4%
1.74
11%
1.3
34%
1.96 ?()
-0%
1.467 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=161, last 2 years)
25%
Idle Maximum *
2.01
2.07
-3%
1.75
13%
1.7
15%
2.01 ?()
-0%
1.621 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=161, last 2 years)
19%
Load Average *
3.86
3.27
15%
3.14
19%
3.8
2%
3.86 ?()
-0%
6.58 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=155, last 2 years)
-70%
Load Maximum *
5.62
5.33
5%
4.75
15%
5.8
-3%
5.62 ?()
-0%
9.91 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=155, last 2 years)
-76%

* ... smaller is better

Power draw: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810: Ø2.92 (1.037-5.3)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700: Ø6.04 (3.61-8.93)

Power draw: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.40.50.70.91.11.21.41.61.81.92.12.32.52.62.833.23.3Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.11 (2.88-3.5)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.06 (2.9-3.43)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.176 (1.05-1.745)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.284 (1.25-1.55)

电池寿命

小米Poco M4 Pro 5G对于一款拥有5000毫安时电池的智能手机来说，实现了体面的电池运行时间。然而，它被其他竞争者打败了。

在我们的实际网络浏览测试中，亮度被设置为150cd/m²，M4在我们的比较表中获得了一个位置。这可能是由于Wi-Fi模块的原因，它已经在我们的参考级路由器的测试中造成了问题。未来的更新可能会解决这些问题。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
45h 22min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 96)
16h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 48min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 22min
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
5000 mAh		Vivo Y72 5G
5000 mAh		Oppo A74 5G
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
4%
12%
27%
13%
Reader / Idle
2722
2812
3%
2853
5%
H.264
1008
1158
15%
1307
30%
WiFi v1.3
966
1025
6%
1084
12%
1223
27%
1156
20%
Load
322
300
-7%
316
-2%

Pros

+ 良好的系统性能
+ 无PWM的90-Hz面板
+ 电池寿命长
+ 快速充电
+ 良好的连接性

Cons

- 设置菜单中的广告
- 只有12个月的保修期
- 没有真正的双SIM卡功能

对全球版Redmi Note 11 5G的裁决

对小米Poco M4 Pro 5G的评论。评测设备由以下单位提供。德国小米公司。
对小米Poco M4 Pro 5G的评论。评测设备由以下单位提供。德国小米公司。

Poco M4 Pro 5G是Redmi Note 11 5G的全球版本，它被定位为入门级设备。尽管如此，这款小米智能手机还是有很多优点的。例如，它配备了90-Hz屏幕、NFS芯片、5G模块、耳机插孔、红外辐射器、立体声扬声器、FM收音机、microSD卡插槽和33W充电器。

小米Poco M4 Pro 5G并没有重新发明轮子，但以低价提供了良好的硬件。

双摄像头系统是朝正确方向迈出的一步。没有微距镜头，但超广角镜头的效果出乎意料地好。主摄像头拍摄的照片还不错。然而，考虑到50万像素的图像传感器，这里我们期待更多。

鉴于小米Poco M4 Pro 5G的价格，不能对其进行太严厉的批评。当然，没有真正的双卡功能，但除此之外，它的功能设置是相当稳固的。强大的竞争对手包括 奥普A74 5G和 三星Galaxy A22 5G.

价格和可用性

小米Poco M4 Pro 5G目前可以在eBay上购买。购买，价格约为260美元。

Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G - 01/12/2022 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
81%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
50 / 70 → 71%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
85%
Games Performance
29 / 64 → 45%
Application Performance
71 / 86 → 82%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Camera
66%
Average
75%
81%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米Poco M4 Pro 5G评测--价格极其低廉的智能手机的升级版
Daniel Schmidt, 2022-01-21 (Update: 2024-08-15)