纤薄的技嘉AERO 16 OLED笔记本电脑回顾。高效的RTX 4070,适合游戏玩家和创作者
技嘉的Aero 16 OLED是一个有趣的混合体,既是游戏笔记本,又是为创意人设计的工作站。除了从Alder到Raptor Lake CPU和从Nvidia RTX 30x到RTX 40x的转换之外,还做了其他改变,如外壳和端口的改变。
我们以前曾对 前代产品与 RTX 3080 Ti和我们目前的配置有一个 RTX 4070.到目前为止,我们只审查了新的Razer 刀片18采用相同的GPU,所以18英寸的将不得不在3D基准中作为比较。否则,我们比较上一代的16英寸竞争对手,包括 华硕Zenbook Pro 16X OLED,以及 华硕TUF游戏机A16和 微星CreatorPro Z16P与其 芯片的微星A300.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.2 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 18 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
84.7 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 22.4 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
91.4 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 21.9 mm | 18.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.4 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 19.5 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
86.2 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S | 2.2 kg | 27 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
84.3 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 19 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 坚固的银色金属底盘
乍一看,设计似乎没有变化,但如果你仔细看看,你可以看到狭窄的银色金属机箱有了相当大的变化。例如,它变得更薄了,而且技嘉终于将一些端口移到了后面。总的来说,制造商的设计更倾向于商务和办公笔记本电脑,而不是游戏笔记本电脑,这当然会让目标群体满意。因此,这个隐藏的游戏机在办公室环境中看起来相当不显眼,甚至与MacBook并列。
光滑的金属一体机身仍然很稳定,特别是在底部,几乎无法扭曲。键盘被稍微降低了。
显示屏盖上印有发光的 "Aero "标志,其刚性有所下降。只有显示器框架是由塑料制成的。
通风孔几乎无处不在,即在背面、侧面、下面和上面。制造质量似乎处于良好水平,没有发现任何缝隙。
Aero 16仅有18毫米,略微薄于ZenBook Pro 16X或 MSI CreatorPro Z16P。它也更轻,前者比后者重200克。
设备--Aero 16终于有了端口!
幸运的是,在端口方面发生了很多变化,因为前代产品微不足道的三个USB-C端口必须用Aero Hub来扩展,包括HDMI、USB-A等。
今年,新的Aero容纳了几乎所有必要的端口。为了做到这一点,它利用了后面的空间,比如说电源连接的地方。我们更希望有一个USB-A,而不是侧面的三个USB-C端口之一,而且仍然缺少一个LAN端口,但至少现在有一个HDMI端口和一个(microSD)阅读器。端口分布很好,除了USB-A在后面而不是在侧面。
SD卡阅读器
MicroSD卡点击到位,只突出了最小的部分(1-2毫米)。
传输速率很好;我们从AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60复制1GB的图像资料到桌面,大约需要7秒。
如果竞争对手根本没有读卡器,那就会比较慢。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years) | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST (AV Pro V60) | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years) | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST (AV Pro V60) | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) |
沟通
英特尔AX210芯片也被安装在去年的模型中,并再次确保了良好的传输速率,尽管微星CreatorPro甚至更快。
该模块支持Wifi 6E,从而支持6GHz的范围。
网络摄像头
技嘉终于在创意笔记本电脑中安装了一个全高清摄像头,所产生的图像相当可用,即使在次优的照明条件下也是如此。然而,看一下ColorChecker,不幸的是,它的颜色偏差很大。前代产品有一个720p的摄像头。
安全问题
Aero并不真正适合安全狂热者。板上有TPM,但没有指纹传感器或Kensington连接。
配件和保修
购买时,笔记本电脑没有附带任何配件。
在德国,制造商提供24个月的保修。这在其他地区可能有所不同,所以感兴趣的买家应该在购买前仔细检查。
维护
首先,需要卸下10颗托克斯螺丝。之后,在狭小的机箱中找到一个缝隙来插入水平工具并不那么容易。最好的方法是朝后。一旦完成了第一步,就会变得容易得多,底板可以毫不费力地被拆开。
在里面,你可以看到风扇、电池、可更换的WLAN模块、两个内存插槽和两个M.2 SSD插槽,其中一个被占用。底板上有用于两个SSD插槽的冷却垫。
输入设备 - 可用的输入
键盘
键盘现在有白色而不是黑色的按键。这看起来更优雅,但你应该避免在明亮的光线下激活白色键盘背光,否则你将不再能够辨别字母 - 但谁会这样做呢?
布局看起来非常整洁。没有一个键显得不合适,甚至连方向键都是正常大小的--非常好。按键的大小适中,而且都有良好的间距。
键程约为1.7毫米,反馈几乎无法察觉。打字速度快,噪音适中,但空格键的声音有点大。
虽然开关集成在键盘的右上方,但它的压力点更牢固,而且更小一些,因此不容易误按。在技嘉笔记本电脑中,亮度(这里再往左)和音量(这里再往右)的特殊按键通常是互换的,这需要一些适应。
触摸板
触摸板的尺寸与前代产品相同(约12.1 x 7.6厘米),但现在是银色而不是黑色,并提供良好的滑行性能,即使是非常缓慢的运动。
集成的按键提供清晰的反馈,因此比键盘按键的声音略大,但仍然适中。
显示屏 - 16英寸OLED,亮点
技嘉再次安装了一块来自三星的16英寸OLED面板,长宽比为16:10,4K分辨率为3840 x 2,400。该面板有一个新的版本号,但仍然只提供60赫兹--这对游戏玩家来说是个不利因素。否则,OLED面板拥有丰富的对比度,伟大的黑色水平和非常好的照明。IPS竞争者在这里已经无法跟上。
我们测量了SDR显示模式下的亮度,略低于400尼特。但该面板也符合HDR600标准。所以我们在HDR模式下测量,得出的峰值亮度为620尼特。这只有在小的测量范围内才有可能,因为OLED在大的、明亮的区域会迅速变暗。
屏幕出血对OLED来说不是一个问题。响应时间也很好。
|
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 387.56 cd/m²
Contrast: 12999:1 (Black: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.68
ΔE Greyscale 2.23 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Samsung SDC4191 (ATNA60YV09-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Samsung SDC416B, AMOLED, 3840x2400, 16" | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 AU Optronics B180QAN01.0, IPS, 2560x1600, 18" | Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Samsung SDC415D, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 NE160WUM-NX2 (BOE0B33), IPS-Level, 1920x1200, 16" | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST B160QAN02.N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -5% | -3% | -20% | -4% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 96.9 -3% | 99.84 0% | 69.4 -31% | 97.6 -2% | |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.8 0% | 99.99 0% | 97.8 -2% | 99.9 0% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 96.4 | 85.3 -12% | 88.9 -8% | 70.9 -26% | 87.4 -9% | |
Response Times | -7% | -207% | -1% | -580% | -407% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2 ? | 2.4 ? -20% | 4.2 ? -110% | 2 ? -0% | 17 ? -750% | 12.8 ? -540% |
Response Time Black / White * | 1.98 ? | 2 ? -1% | 8 ? -304% | 2 ? -1% | 10.1 ? -410% | 7.4 ? -274% |
PWM Frequency | 60 | 60 ? 0% | 59 ? -2% | |||
Screen | 34% | -208% | -8% | -80% | -118% | |
Brightness middle | 389.97 | 368 -6% | 549.6 41% | 346 -11% | 308 -21% | 407 4% |
Brightness | 395 | 368 -7% | 524 33% | 354 -10% | 293 -26% | 388 -2% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 93 -4% | 89 -8% | 96 -1% | 90 -7% | 88 -9% |
Black Level * | 0.03 | 0.01 67% | 0.53 -1667% | 0.23 -667% | 0.36 -1100% | |
Contrast | 12999 | 36800 183% | 1037 -92% | 1339 -90% | 1131 -91% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2 | 2.33 -17% | 3.32 -66% | 2.28 -14% | 1.47 26% | 1.3 35% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.1 | 4.34 -6% | 6.63 -62% | 4.94 -20% | 2.98 27% | 2.5 39% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.68 | 2.7 -61% | 2.16 -29% | 1.02 39% | 0.7 58% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.23 | 0.8 64% | 2 10% | 1.64 26% | 2.2 1% | 2.1 6% |
Gamma | 2.41 91% | 2.119 104% | 2.29 96% | 2.37 93% | 2.228 99% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 6323 103% | 6569 99% | 6319 103% | 6384 102% | 6228 104% | 6437 101% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 14% /
23% | -140% /
-164% | -4% /
-5% | -227% /
-138% | -176% /
-135% |
* ... smaller is better
Gigabyte宣传Aero 16提供100%的DCI-P3覆盖率,我们的测量结果证实了这一说法。甚至AdobeRGB的覆盖率也达到了96.4%。因此,OLED显示屏非常适用于编辑照片和视频。
这台显示器已经被很好地校准过了,我们通过Portrait Displays Calman Color Calibration进行的校准将DeltaE值稍微推低了一些。所以显示器只有非常轻微的颜色和灰度偏差。我们的ICC配置文件可以在上面下载。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.98 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.5 ms rise | |
↘ 1.48 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
↘ 1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
作为OLED的典型特征,显示屏在全亮度下的闪烁频率为60赫兹。在大约50%的亮度和更低的亮度下,频率会发生变化,238赫兹可能会对敏感的人造成困扰。
当然,在户外,反光的表面会让人分心。相当平均的SDR亮度和良好的对比度只能在有限的程度上平衡这一缺点。建议在阴凉处和直接观看的角度。
亮度的损失只有在从极端角度看显示器时才会明显。
性能 - 尽管有105瓦,但3D性能良好
测试条件
我们的测试设备没有预装控制中心,所以一开始就没有性能模式。Gigabyte在Windows中预装的电源模式对Cinebench R15中的CPU性能几乎没有影响。
因此,由于风扇一开始就没有静止,我们随后安装了技嘉的控制中心。在这里,我们面临着性能模式的艰难选择:这里总共有五个,我们很难在内容创建者和游戏之间做出选择。因此,我们不得不在性能好但风扇声音较大的模式和性能较弱但操作较安静的模式之间做出决定。
最后,我们在没有控制中心的情况下进行了CPU基准测试,即在交付状态下。然后在游戏模式下运行GPU基准测试。
该软件并不总是完全没有错误。例如,在一些启动过程中,它只是显示一个黑色窗口。同样令人困惑的是,除了模式之外,还有另一个选择窗口 "电源模式",有更多的电源控制选项。这些可能代表了能源模式,因为如果你将其设置为自定义,就可以选择Windows的电源模式。
在主要模式的左边还有一个 "AI "开关。AI "根据情况独立选择最佳模式,例如,当我们断开电源插头时,选择节能模式。
处理器
Aero的核心是一个英特尔酷睿i9-13900H,是英特尔全新的猛禽湖系列的旗舰之一。这提供了6个性能和8个效率核心,前者在涡轮增压状态下的时钟频率高达5.4GHz!另外,该设备也可以使用 i7-13700H.
在我们的Cinebench R15循环中,Aero名列前茅,但比i9-12900H的优势是i9-12900H的优势是微不足道的,而且在所有的CPU测试中,前者几乎没有慢下来。
对功耗的观察表明,你肯定应该安装控制中心。另一方面,如果你在控制中心切换到游戏模式,短期TDP会增加到115W,然后在Cinebench运行的剩余时间里,会挂在60W左右。因此,这在很大程度上取决于电源设置。
在没有游戏模式的情况下,新的Aero 16在所有CPU基准测试中都不比它的前辈快。
在电池模式下,CPU只能消耗约20W,Cinebench得分也相应较低。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=188, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (11997 - 20385, n=28) | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1297 - 2054, n=26) | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (4935 - 7716, n=25) | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (428 - 792, n=25) | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2061 - 3100, n=26) | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (211 - 297, n=26) | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (166 - 268, n=24) | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (45045 - 79032, n=25) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3665 - 6600, n=25) | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (9094 - 15410, n=26) | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1140 - 2043, n=26) | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (14.1 - 22.3, n=25) | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (34.4 - 82.8, n=25) | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (0.4052 - 0.723, n=25) | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6788 - 19557, n=25) | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (22551 - 95579, n=25) | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2491 - 4270, n=25) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (65121 - 120936, n=25) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6108 - 11631, n=25) | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (11283 - 48474, n=25) | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3691 - 149377, n=25) | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (789 - 1254, n=25) | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3655 - 10716, n=25) | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (10871 - 50488, n=25) | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
系统性能
在PCMark 10中,我们的Aero与去年的微星CreatorPro Z16P。不幸的是,Aero的生产力得分很低,但它在其他子测试中表现很好。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (5855 - 8538, n=8) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8835 - 11940, n=8) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7967 - 10991, n=8) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7738 - 13575, n=8) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1104 - 1974, n=7) | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1058 - 1914, n=7) | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=147, last 2 years) | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1178 - 2254, n=7) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1037 - 1952, n=7) | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W |
PCMark 10 Score | 8058 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years) | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (37448 - 74486, n=25) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (41599 - 75433, n=25) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years) | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (36152 - 88505, n=25) | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (75.8 - 102.3, n=25) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
启动LatencyMon后不久,该软件就检测到了第一个DPC延迟。在启动浏览器和打开多个标签时,这些延迟进一步增加。另一方面,我们的4K/60帧的YouTube视频被流畅地渲染,没有跳帧。
Razer Blade 18 的延迟值甚至比我们的Aero更差。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
该制造商使用自己公司的非常快的PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD。它目前在我们的最佳名单中排名第二 。
这里的模型并没有完全达到它的最佳性能,特别是由于前辈(排名第一)中的Phison内存要快一点。
至少性能是相对稳定的,而且底板上附有冷却垫,这一点很好。
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
说到GPU,你可以选择RTX 4060和 RTX 4070在我们的测试单元中安装了更强大的变体。在薄型Aero中,它通常消耗约105W。最大是115加25W动态提升,但我们的同事Andreas最近在他的卡评中指出 RTX 4070在100W以上几乎没有任何性能提升。.
在合成3DMarks中,该卡处于预期水平,尽管我们的数据库中没有太多的其他测量结果。毕竟,它是偶尔领先于竞争设备的一个 RTX 3080 Ti,而 前辈它的RTX 3080 Ti也被击败了近20%。 创造者的30%。即使是拥有相同GPU和名义上更快的CPU的Blade 18也略微落后。这款 Alienware x15 R2配有RTX 3080 Ti,则略微领先。
在电池模式下,大量的3D性能丧失,在Fire Strike ,得分下降了近70%!
3DMark 11 Performance | 33703 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 55475 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 25526 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 13175 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 12029 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
在游戏方面,Aero 16刚刚被超过了刀片18总的来说,只是因为在DOTA 2 Reborn和X-Plane 11.11中的成绩不佳。Aero甚至在GPU重的游戏中也有优势。这很有趣,因为 RTX 4070在Blade中被允许使用140瓦,但在Aero中只有105瓦,这证实了 目前,运行该卡超过100W是没有意义的。.
总的来说,它可以处理所有2K以下的游戏,有时甚至超过2K,尽管该卡在4K的非常苛刻的游戏中有时会耗尽能量。
另一方面,光线追踪性能非常好。在Cyberpunkt中,在1080p下激活光线追踪,它只从大约85帧下降到65帧。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=179, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (33.2 - 220, n=185, last 2 years) | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
Aero 16不提供Advanced Optimus,Nvidia的Whisper Mode也是如此。然而,有一个MUX开关,这样你就可以在iGPU和dGPU之间手动切换。
在游戏模式下,Witcher 3 ,一个多小时的帧率是相当稳定的,高于Razer Blade 18.
GPU的功耗几乎恒定在105W左右,这意味着核心时钟(2,350MHz)和内存时钟(2,000MHz)也非常恒定。该卡发热约为80℃。
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 185.3 | 186.4 | 183.1 | 123.2 | 90.6 | 75 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 236 | 116 | ||||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 164.7 | 157 | 150.9 | 144.5 | 128.3 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 132.3 | 116.2 | 84.7 | 46.1 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 169.3 | 148 | 115.3 | 98.5 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 202 | 168 | 159 | 149 | 115 | 55 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 481 | 300 | 237 | 204 | 138.8 | 67.6 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 158 | 129 | 70 | |||
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) | 106 | 78 | 41 | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 84.75 | 53.28 | 19.59 | |||
F1 22 (2022) | 220 | 214 | 173.8 | 66.6 | 44.3 | 21.5 |
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) | 101 | 72 | 39 | |||
Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022) | 90.5 | 68.9 | 40.5 | |||
The Callisto Protocol (2022) | 78.86 | 59.07 | 32.96 |
排放 - Aero 16仍然相当凉爽,但不安静
噪声
纤薄的Aero 16在重压下的游戏模式下变得相当吵。游戏或我们的压力测试导致风扇旋转到55分贝,这比竞争对手的声音大,但考虑到薄的外形因素,这并不令人惊讶。
在创造者模式下,音量从游戏模式的55分贝下降到压力测试的50分贝左右。这使Aero更接近竞争对手,后者有类似的噪音水平。只有会议模式试图让设备真正保持安静。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 33.64 dB(A) |
Load |
| 51.49 / 55.24 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 | Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -7% | 8% | -1% | 5% | 4% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 25 -9% | 23.5 -2% | 26 -13% | 24 -4% | 24.1 -5% |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 30 -30% | 23.8 -3% | 26 -13% | 24 -4% | 27.1 -18% |
Idle Average * | 23 | 32 -39% | 23.8 -3% | 26 -13% | 25 -9% | 27.1 -18% |
Idle Maximum * | 33.64 | 33 2% | 26.8 20% | 26 23% | 28 17% | 27.1 19% |
Load Average * | 51.49 | 45 13% | 37.3 28% | 48 7% | 42 18% | 42.9 17% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 55.27 | 50 10% | 48 13% | 50 10% | 44 20% | |
Load Maximum * | 55.24 | 52 6% | 53.5 3% | 54.6 1% | 50 9% | 47 15% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
尽管它的外壳很薄,但Aero在这个领域表现良好。相对较响的风扇和金属外壳能很好地散热,因此背面的热点保持在50℃以下。前代产品和几个竞争对手在这方面的表现更差。掌托总是在一个舒适的范围内。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.8 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -31% | -14% | -17% | -45% | -26% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41 | 49 -20% | 39.2 4% | 32 22% | 54 -32% | 56.3 -37% |
Maximum Bottom * | 47 | 55 -17% | 35.6 24% | 41.6 11% | 47 -0% | 68.3 -45% |
Idle Upper Side * | 23 | 33 -43% | 31.8 -38% | 32.6 -42% | 40 -74% | 25.2 -10% |
Idle Bottom * | 23 | 33 -43% | 33.2 -44% | 36 -57% | 40 -74% | 25.9 -13% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在压力测试中,CPU能够在短时间内消耗105W,然后在几秒钟后下降到恒定的62W。同时,时钟以4.1 GHz的速度短暂启动,然后下降到2.9 GHz左右。然而,这并不是保持恒定,而是随着温度的变化而波动。当核心温度达到90°C时,时钟被轻微节流,之后温度再次下降。在刚刚超过80°C时,时钟速率又会略微上升,等等。
GPU时钟也在1.7和2.4GHz之间连续波动。相比之下,内存时钟从2GHz上升到1.75GHz,然后下降。同样的波形在GPU温度中也很明显,它大致在70-80℃之间波动。在压力测试中,功耗从未达到最大值,但仅在67W左右徘徊。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2,9 | 1.990 | 84 | 76 |
Witcher 3 应力 | 1,8 | 2.350 | 69 | 80 |
发言人
Gigabyte安装了两个立体声扬声器,每个2W,这通常是标准的。不幸的是,这些扬声器在任何学科上都没有真正的说服力:它们的声音还算响亮,但无法提供均衡的中音或高音。
除了数字输出外,3.5毫米的耳机插槽可用于外部设备。
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 12.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (16.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (48.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 100% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理--Aero 16中的高效RTX 4070
消耗功率
能源消耗非常好,特别是与前代相比。在前代产品中,耗电量大的 RTX 3080 Ti在游戏基准测试中,你可以看到旧卡的性能明显变差,而消耗的能量明显增加。新的RTX 40x一代显然要高效得多。更多关于 更多关于新RTX 40x一代的效率的信息可以在这里找到.
当使用Witcher 3 ,平均消耗量约为158W。Chicony的中型标准电源的额定功率为240W,在压力测试中能很好地应对高达192W的负载峰值。
Off / Standby | 0.2 / 4 Watt |
Idle | 11.8 / 16.1 / 17 Watt |
Load |
100.6 / 192 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Phison ESR01TBMFCT, AMOLED, 3840x2400, 16" | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 2560x1600, 18" | Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, IPS-Level, 1920x1200, 16" | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -64% | -84% | 4% | 14% | 2% | -14% | -25% | |
Idle Minimum * | 11.8 | 26 -120% | 24.5 -108% | 11.1 6% | 8 32% | 10.8 8% | 12.4 ? -5% | 13.5 ? -14% |
Idle Average * | 16.1 | 30 -86% | 34.1 -112% | 11.4 29% | 11 32% | 16.3 -1% | 17.5 ? -9% | 19 ? -18% |
Idle Maximum * | 17 | 37 -118% | 47.7 -181% | 14.4 15% | 16 6% | 16.9 1% | 24.2 ? -42% | 26.8 ? -58% |
Load Average * | 100.6 | 127 -26% | 140 -39% | 137.4 -37% | 97 4% | 111.7 -11% | 98.2 ? 2% | 106.9 ? -6% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 158 | 176 -11% | 202 -28% | 136 14% | 161.5 -2% | 152.1 4% | ||
Load Maximum * | 192 | 236 -23% | 261 -36% | 197 -3% | 168 12% | 177.4 8% | 223 ? -16% | 250 ? -30% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Power Consumption with an External Monitor
电池寿命
电池运行时间在很大程度上取决于所选择的模式,明亮的OLED屏幕也会耗费相当多的电量。这款笔记本电脑仍然有一个88Wh的电池。由于整体消耗较低,通过精心选择的节能模式,可以实现更长的运行时间。
当在降低亮度的情况下看电影或上网时,我们每个人都能得到不到7.5小时的时间,这是一个不错的价值。Gigabyte在这里自动激活了节能模式。在最大亮度下,运行时间下降到5.5小时。
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 88 Wh | Alienware x15 R2 P111F i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 87 Wh | MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.98 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -19% | -36% | -7% | -2% | -12% | -18% | |
H.264 | 442 | 345 -22% | 559 26% | 490 11% | 452 2% | 409 ? -7% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 448 | 362.5 -19% | 310 -31% | 469 5% | 344 -23% | 381 -15% | 376 ? -16% |
Load | 126 | 58 -54% | 62 -51% | 133 6% | 96 -24% | 85.6 ? -32% | |
Reader / Idle | 749 | 533 | 565 ? |
Pros
Cons
评语--离目标更近了一步
到目前为止,高性能的笔记本电脑往往是大的、响的和热的,使它们适合于游戏者或创造者,这取决于设计。在未来,我们最希望的是静音、凉爽,如果需要的话,是小型的移动笔记本电脑。Aero是朝着这个方向迈出的良好一步,尽管目前的技术还远非理想。
Aero的性能比其更厚的前辈与 RTX 3080 Ti(也只有105W),但其高效的 RTX 4070消耗明显更少,并保持更冷,尽管不是更安静。如果你正在寻找谨慎,你会从控制中心的许多电源模式和手动设置选项中受益。这使你能够使Aero的性能和排放适应各自的情况或环境。由于目前Aero在 "游戏 "评级类别中的得分(88%)比在 "多媒体 "类别中的得分(86%)要高,我们将其评为游戏笔记本。
游戏玩家可能会对本来很好的OLED显示屏只能在60赫兹下运行这一事实感到困扰。否则,所有其他的批评点,如不平衡的扬声器,都相对温和。
Aero 16 OLED不仅有一个很好的屏幕,而且特别薄,由于高效的RTX 4070,也很强大,但又相对经济和冷静。
竞争者从不睡觉,也在探索新的RTX 40x代的可能性。到目前为止,我们只评测了几款,所以替代品仍然很少。
价格和可用性
有兴趣的买家可以直接通过Gigabyte的官方产品页面进行查询。在这里,你点击购买,并从下拉列表中选择你相应的地区和国家。然后你会被转到一个可能在你的国家列出该笔记本电脑的在线商店列表。
例如,在美国,亚马逊列出了技嘉Aero 16 OLED的两个配置,即一个是i9-13900H和32GB RAM,另一个是i7-13700H和16GB RAM。两者都是US$2.299,00和US$2.099,00,分别为2.299,00美元和2.099,00美元。当然,这并不代表全球供应情况,可能会因地区和运输因素而有所波动。
价格截至12.03.2023,可能会有变化。
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
- 03/13/2023 v7 (old)
Christian Hintze
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.