Notebookcheck Logo

纤薄的技嘉AERO 16 OLED笔记本电脑回顾。高效的RTX 4070,适合游戏玩家和创作者

创造者?游戏者?CreAmer。

Aero 16 OLED采用略微修改的设计、新的连接和新的硬件,以英特尔13代和Nvidia RTX 4070为基础,寻求赢得游戏玩家和创作者的青睐。我们通过对笔记本电脑的测试来了解外壳的变化和硬件的升级给它带来了什么。
Business Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Raptor Lake

技嘉的Aero 16 OLED是一个有趣的混合体,既是游戏笔记本,又是为创意人设计的工作站。除了从Alder到Raptor Lake CPU和从Nvidia RTX 30x到RTX 40x的转换之外,还做了其他改变,如外壳和端口的改变。

我们以前曾对 前代产品RTX 3080 Ti和我们目前的配置有一个 RTX 4070.到目前为止,我们只审查了新的Razer 刀片18采用相同的GPU,所以18英寸的将不得不在3D基准中作为比较。否则,我们比较上一代的16英寸竞争对手,包括 华硕Zenbook Pro 16X OLED,以及 华硕TUF游戏机A16微星CreatorPro Z16P与其 芯片的微星A300.

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF (Aero 16 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-13900H 14 x 1.9 - 5.4 GHz, 115 W PL2 / Short Burst, 61 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1980 MHz, 105 W TDP, GDDR6
Memory
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB Samsung DDR5-4800
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 283 PPI, Samsung SDC4191 (ATNA60YV09-0, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, 1024 GB 
, 960 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH - cAVS
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headset, Card Reader: microSD card reader
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 18 x 354 x 255
Battery
88 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: FullHD IR Webcam for WIndows Hello
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes
Weight
2.1 kg, Power Supply: 705 g
Price
3000 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
86.2 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg18 mm16.00"3840x2400
84.7 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2022
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg22.4 mm16.00"3840x2400
91.4 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3 kg21.9 mm18.00"2560x1600
88.4 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2022
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg19.5 mm16.00"3840x2400
86.2 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
2.2 kg27 mm16.00"1920x1200
84.3 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2022
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg19 mm16.00"2560x1600

外壳 - 坚固的银色金属底盘

乍一看,设计似乎没有变化,但如果你仔细看看,你可以看到狭窄的银色金属机箱有了相当大的变化。例如,它变得更薄了,而且技嘉终于将一些端口移到了后面。总的来说,制造商的设计更倾向于商务和办公笔记本电脑,而不是游戏笔记本电脑,这当然会让目标群体满意。因此,这个隐藏的游戏机在办公室环境中看起来相当不显眼,甚至与MacBook并列。

光滑的金属一体机身仍然很稳定,特别是在底部,几乎无法扭曲。键盘被稍微降低了。

显示屏盖上印有发光的 "Aero "标志,其刚性有所下降。只有显示器框架是由塑料制成的。

通风孔几乎无处不在,即在背面、侧面、下面和上面。制造质量似乎处于良好水平,没有发现任何缝隙。

Aero 16仅有18毫米,略微薄于ZenBook Pro 16XMSI CreatorPro Z16P。它也更轻,前者比后者重200克。

尺寸比较

399.9 mm 275.4 mm 21.9 mm 3 kg355 mm 252 mm 27 mm 2.2 kg356 mm 248.5 mm 22.4 mm 2.3 kg359 mm 256 mm 19 mm 2.4 kg356 mm 254 mm 19.5 mm 2.4 kg354 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备--Aero 16终于有了端口!

幸运的是,在端口方面发生了很多变化,因为前代产品微不足道的三个USB-C端口必须用Aero Hub来扩展,包括HDMI、USB-A等。

今年,新的Aero容纳了几乎所有必要的端口。为了做到这一点,它利用了后面的空间,比如说电源连接的地方。我们更希望有一个USB-A,而不是侧面的三个USB-C端口之一,而且仍然缺少一个LAN端口,但至少现在有一个HDMI端口和一个(microSD)阅读器。端口分布很好,除了USB-A在后面而不是在侧面。

左边:USB-C 3.2 Gen2,microSD,耳机
左边:USB-C 3.2 Gen2,microSD,耳机
右边:2个Thunderbolt 4(2个DP,1个PD)。
右边:2个Thunderbolt 4(2个DP,1个PD)。
背面:电源、USB-A 3.0、HDMI
背面:电源、USB-A 3.0、HDMI

SD卡阅读器

微型SD卡只突出了很小的部分
微型SD卡只突出了很小的部分

MicroSD卡点击到位,只突出了最小的部分(1-2毫米)。

传输速率很好;我们从AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60复制1GB的图像资料到桌面,大约需要7秒。

如果竞争对手根本没有读卡器,那就会比较慢。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)
202 MB/s +11%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
181.2 (133.5min - 187.53max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)
95.9 MB/s -47%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro V60)
81.3 MB/s -55%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
71.7 MB/s -60%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)
207.8 MB/s +10%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
188.81 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)
120 MB/s -36%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro V60)
85.5 MB/s -55%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
81 MB/s -57%

沟通

可更换的WLAN模块
可更换的WLAN模块

英特尔AX210芯片也被安装在去年的模型中,并再次确保了良好的传输速率,尽管微星CreatorPro甚至更快。

该模块支持Wifi 6E,从而支持6GHz的范围。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1690 (1617min, 1618.16P1 - 1721max) MBit/s +5%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1611 (805min - 1631max) MBit/s
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1516 (769min - 1565max) MBit/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (853 - 1788, n=69, last 2 years)
1491 MBit/s -7%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (885 - 1827, n=23)
1478 MBit/s -8%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=147, last 2 years)
1390 MBit/s
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1362 (1249min - 1437max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (715 - 1711, n=25)
1202 MBit/s
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1030 (752min - 1313max) MBit/s
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
942 (920min - 950max) MBit/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
MediaTek MT7921
899 (755min - 936max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1659 (1602min, 1605.19P1 - 1702max) MBit/s +15%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1444 (745min - 1487max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (648 - 1878, n=69, last 2 years)
1432 MBit/s -1%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (712 - 1615, n=22)
1338 MBit/s -7%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1230 (1091min - 1327max) MBit/s -15%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1333 (1044min - 1390max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=147, last 2 years)
1238 MBit/s
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1196 (618min - 1298max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (565 - 1670, n=25)
1086 MBit/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
MediaTek MT7921
908 (806min - 973max) MBit/s
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
891 (558min - 996max) MBit/s
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1419 (745-1487)
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1659 (1602-1702)
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø891 (558-996)

网络摄像头

技嘉终于在创意笔记本电脑中安装了一个全高清摄像头,所产生的图像相当可用,即使在次优的照明条件下也是如此。然而,看一下ColorChecker,不幸的是,它的颜色偏差很大。前代产品有一个720p的摄像头。

ColorChecker
18 ∆E
23 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
15 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF: 17.17 ∆E min: 2.28 - max: 23.28 ∆E

安全问题

Aero并不真正适合安全狂热者。板上有TPM,但没有指纹传感器或Kensington连接。

配件和保修

购买时,笔记本电脑没有附带任何配件。

在德国,制造商提供24个月的保修。这在其他地区可能有所不同,所以感兴趣的买家应该在购买前仔细检查。

维护

SSD的冷却垫
SSD的冷却垫

首先,需要卸下10颗托克斯螺丝。之后,在狭小的机箱中找到一个缝隙来插入水平工具并不那么容易。最好的方法是朝后。一旦完成了第一步,就会变得容易得多,底板可以毫不费力地被拆开。

在里面,你可以看到风扇、电池、可更换的WLAN模块、两个内存插槽和两个M.2 SSD插槽,其中一个被占用。底板上有用于两个SSD插槽的冷却垫。


从这里开始使用杠杆工具
从这里开始使用杠杆工具
推开
推开
不含底板
不含底板
这两个RAM插槽
这两个RAM插槽

输入设备 - 可用的输入

键盘

键盘现在有白色而不是黑色的按键。这看起来更优雅,但你应该避免在明亮的光线下激活白色键盘背光,否则你将不再能够辨别字母 - 但谁会这样做呢?

前身:黑钥匙
前身:黑钥匙
我们新的Areo 16 OLED
我们新的Areo 16 OLED

布局看起来非常整洁。没有一个键显得不合适,甚至连方向键都是正常大小的--非常好。按键的大小适中,而且都有良好的间距。

键程约为1.7毫米,反馈几乎无法察觉。打字速度快,噪音适中,但空格键的声音有点大。

虽然开关集成在键盘的右上方,但它的压力点更牢固,而且更小一些,因此不容易误按。在技嘉笔记本电脑中,亮度(这里再往左)和音量(这里再往右)的特殊按键通常是互换的,这需要一些适应。

正常大小的方向键
正常大小的方向键
整洁的布局
整洁的布局

触摸板

触摸板的尺寸与前代产品相同(约12.1 x 7.6厘米),但现在是银色而不是黑色,并提供良好的滑行性能,即使是非常缓慢的运动。

集成的按键提供清晰的反馈,因此比键盘按键的声音略大,但仍然适中。

触摸板
触摸板
触摸板是有图案的
触摸板是有图案的

显示屏 - 16英寸OLED,亮点

清晰的OLED子像素
清晰的OLED子像素
HDR峰值亮度:620尼特
HDR峰值亮度:620尼特

技嘉再次安装了一块来自三星的16英寸OLED面板,长宽比为16:10,4K分辨率为3840 x 2,400。该面板有一个新的版本号,但仍然只提供60赫兹--这对游戏玩家来说是个不利因素。否则,OLED面板拥有丰富的对比度,伟大的黑色水平和非常好的照明。IPS竞争者在这里已经无法跟上。

我们测量了SDR显示模式下的亮度,略低于400尼特。但该面板也符合HDR600标准。所以我们在HDR模式下测量,得出的峰值亮度为620尼特。这只有在小的测量范围内才有可能,因为OLED在大的、明亮的区域会迅速变暗。

屏幕出血对OLED来说不是一个问题。响应时间也很好。

398.31
cd/m²
392.73
cd/m²
397.07
cd/m²
393.69
cd/m²
389.97
cd/m²
397.95
cd/m²
391.06
cd/m²
392.12
cd/m²
402.15
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Samsung SDC4191 (ATNA60YV09-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 402.15 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 395 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 387.56 cd/m²
Contrast: 12999:1 (Black: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.68
ΔE Greyscale 2.23 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Samsung SDC4191 (ATNA60YV09-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16"
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Samsung SDC416B, AMOLED, 3840x2400, 16"
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
AU Optronics B180QAN01.0, IPS, 2560x1600, 18"
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung SDC415D, OLED, 3840x2400, 16"
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
NE160WUM-NX2 (BOE0B33), IPS-Level, 1920x1200, 16"
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
B160QAN02.N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display
-5%
-3%
-20%
-4%
Display P3 Coverage
99.9
96.9
-3%
99.84
0%
69.4
-31%
97.6
-2%
sRGB Coverage
100
99.8
0%
99.99
0%
97.8
-2%
99.9
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
96.4
85.3
-12%
88.9
-8%
70.9
-26%
87.4
-9%
Response Times
-7%
-207%
-1%
-580%
-407%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2 ?(1, 1)
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
-20%
4.2 ?(2.1, 2.1)
-110%
2 ?(1, 1)
-0%
17 ?(8, 9)
-750%
12.8 ?(6.2, 6.6)
-540%
Response Time Black / White *
1.98 ?(0.5, 1.48)
2 ?(1, 1)
-1%
8 ?(3.8, 4.2)
-304%
2 ?(1, 1)
-1%
10.1 ?(5.4, 4.7)
-410%
7.4 ?(3.4, 4)
-274%
PWM Frequency
60
60 ?(58)
0%
59 ?(80)
-2%
Screen
34%
-208%
-8%
-80%
-118%
Brightness middle
389.97
368
-6%
549.6
41%
346
-11%
308
-21%
407
4%
Brightness
395
368
-7%
524
33%
354
-10%
293
-26%
388
-2%
Brightness Distribution
97
93
-4%
89
-8%
96
-1%
90
-7%
88
-9%
Black Level *
0.03
0.01
67%
0.53
-1667%
0.23
-667%
0.36
-1100%
Contrast
12999
36800
183%
1037
-92%
1339
-90%
1131
-91%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2
2.33
-17%
3.32
-66%
2.28
-14%
1.47
26%
1.3
35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.1
4.34
-6%
6.63
-62%
4.94
-20%
2.98
27%
2.5
39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.68
2.7
-61%
2.16
-29%
1.02
39%
0.7
58%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.23
0.8
64%
2
10%
1.64
26%
2.2
1%
2.1
6%
Gamma
2.41 91%
2.119 104%
2.29 96%
2.37 93%
2.228 99%
2.26 97%
CCT
6323 103%
6569 99%
6319 103%
6384 102%
6228 104%
6437 101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
14% / 23%
-140% / -164%
-4% / -5%
-227% / -138%
-176% / -135%

* ... smaller is better

Gigabyte宣传Aero 16提供100%的DCI-P3覆盖率,我们的测量结果证实了这一说法。甚至AdobeRGB的覆盖率也达到了96.4%。因此,OLED显示屏非常适用于编辑照片和视频。

sRGB
sRGB
显示P3
显示P3
AdobeRGB
AdobeRGB

这台显示器已经被很好地校准过了,我们通过Portrait Displays Calman Color Calibration进行的校准将DeltaE值稍微推低了一些。所以显示器只有非常轻微的颜色和灰度偏差。我们的ICC配置文件可以在上面下载。

灰度
灰度
饱和度
饱和度
颜色检测器
颜色检测器
灰度标定
灰度标定
饱和度校验
饱和度校验
校准的ColorChecker
校准的ColorChecker

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.98 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5 ms rise
↘ 1.48 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

作为OLED的典型特征,显示屏在全亮度下的闪烁频率为60赫兹。在大约50%的亮度和更低的亮度下,频率会发生变化,238赫兹可能会对敏感的人造成困扰。

全亮度:60赫兹
全亮度:60赫兹
50%的亮度:238赫兹
50%的亮度:238赫兹
0%的亮度:238赫兹
0%的亮度:238赫兹

当然,在户外,反光的表面会让人分心。相当平均的SDR亮度和良好的对比度只能在有限的程度上平衡这一缺点。建议在阴凉处和直接观看的角度。

在阴天的阴凉处
在阴天的阴凉处
反光屏
反光屏

亮度的损失只有在从极端角度看显示器时才会明显。

性能 - 尽管有105瓦,但3D性能良好

Aero容纳了全新的硬件。搭配的是i9-13900H, RTX 4070和32GB DDR5-4800的组合应该不会给用户带来任何问题,无论是游戏还是使用创意应用程序。

然而,所有这些硬件都被装在一个薄薄的箱子里,所以它不能以全功率运行,如下图所示。毕竟,一台创造性的笔记本电脑不应该是一台超热的咆哮式笔记本电脑,所以铁杆玩家在这里要吃点苦头。

测试条件

预装的电源模式对性能的影响很小
预装的电源模式对性能的影响很小

我们的测试设备没有预装控制中心,所以一开始就没有性能模式。Gigabyte在Windows中预装的电源模式对Cinebench R15中的CPU性能几乎没有影响。

因此,由于风扇一开始就没有静止,我们随后安装了技嘉的控制中心。在这里,我们面临着性能模式的艰难选择:这里总共有五个,我们很难在内容创建者和游戏之间做出选择。因此,我们不得不在性能好但风扇声音较大的模式和性能较弱但操作较安静的模式之间做出决定。

最后,我们在没有控制中心的情况下进行了CPU基准测试,即在交付状态下。然后在游戏模式下运行GPU基准测试。

该软件并不总是完全没有错误。例如,在一些启动过程中,它只是显示一个黑色窗口。同样令人困惑的是,除了模式之外,还有另一个选择窗口 "电源模式",有更多的电源控制选项。这些可能代表了能源模式,因为如果你将其设置为自定义,就可以选择Windows的电源模式。

在主要模式的左边还有一个 "AI "开关。AI "根据情况独立选择最佳模式,例如,当我们断开电源插头时,选择节能模式。

技嘉控制中心的模式
技嘉控制中心的模式
可手动调节的风扇曲线
可手动调节的风扇曲线

处理器

游戏模式下的TDP
游戏模式下的TDP
创造者模式下的TDP(参照电池)。
创造者模式下的TDP(参照电池)。
不含控制中心的TDP
不含控制中心的TDP
电池模式下的TDP
电池模式下的TDP

Aero的核心是一个英特尔酷睿i9-13900H,是英特尔全新的猛禽湖系列的旗舰之一。这提供了6个性能和8个效率核心,前者在涡轮增压状态下的时钟频率高达5.4GHz!另外,该设备也可以使用 i7-13700H.

在我们的Cinebench R15循环中,Aero名列前茅,但比i9-12900H的优势是i9-12900H的优势是微不足道的,而且在所有的CPU测试中,前者几乎没有慢下来。

对功耗的观察表明,你肯定应该安装控制中心。另一方面,如果你在控制中心切换到游戏模式,短期TDP会增加到115W,然后在Cinebench运行的剩余时间里,会挂在60W左右。因此,这在很大程度上取决于电源设置。

在没有游戏模式的情况下,新的Aero 16在所有CPU基准测试中都不比它的前辈快。

在电池模式下,CPU只能消耗约20W,Cinebench得分也相应较低。

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

01503004506007509001050120013501500165018001950210022502400255027002850Tooltip
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2829 (2772.58-2962.96)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2616 (2562.79-2779.9)
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2600 (2458.81-2626.74)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2250 (2235.89-2298.72)
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2211 (2130.95-2274.54)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
85.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
69.2 pt
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
63.7 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
60.8 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
 
60.7 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
59.9 pt
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H
59.1 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
50.3 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
28681 (25585.5min - 28680.9max) Points +49%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=188, last 2 years)
21841 Points +14%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
19188 Points
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18106 Points -6%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H
17228 Points -10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (11997 - 20385, n=28)
16813 Points -12%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
16691 (16019.4min - 16691.2max) Points -13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
13995 Points -27%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2076 Points +22%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1940 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=186, last 2 years)
1888 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (1297 - 2054, n=26)
1887 Points +11%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H
1738 Points +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
1718 Points +1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
1707 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1561 Points -9%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
10919 Points +51%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)
8311 Points +15%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
7254 Points
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6941 Points -4%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H
6742 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (4935 - 7716, n=25)
6533 Points -10%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
6060 Points -16%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
5441 Points -25%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
797 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)
725 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (428 - 792, n=25)
720 Points +11%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
685 Points +5%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
680 Points +4%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H
675 Points +4%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
651 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
612 Points -6%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
4481 Points +51%
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)
3421 Points +15%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
2963 (2772.58min - 2962.96max) Points
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2780 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (2061 - 3100, n=26)
2676 Points -10%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
2627 (2458.81min - 2626.74max) Points -11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
2299 (2235.89min - 2298.72max) Points -22%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H
2211 (2130.95min, 2137.41P1 - 2274.54max) Points -25%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
297 Points +22%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
279 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)
278 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (211 - 297, n=26)
269 Points +11%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
264 Points +9%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
245 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
248 Points +2%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
243 Points
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H
238 Points -2%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
225 Seconds * -31%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (166 - 268, n=24)
205 Seconds * -19%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H
201 Seconds * -17%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
200 Seconds * -16%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
185 Seconds * -8%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
172 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years)
170.7 Seconds * +1%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
111 Seconds * +35%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
116665 MIPS +57%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years)
85288 MIPS +15%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
74386 MIPS
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
69637 MIPS -6%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
68520 MIPS -8%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H
66768 MIPS -10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (45045 - 79032, n=25)
66435 MIPS -11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
61292 MIPS -18%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
6880 MIPS +24%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years)
6304 MIPS +13%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6186 MIPS +11%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (3665 - 6600, n=25)
6054 MIPS +9%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
5842 MIPS +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
5779 MIPS +4%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H
5765 MIPS +4%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
5570 MIPS
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
20036 Points +45%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years)
15012 Points +9%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
13865 Points +1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
13796 Points
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
13547 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (9094 - 15410, n=26)
12649 Points -8%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H
12125 Points -12%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
9836 Points -29%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2035 Points +18%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (1140 - 2043, n=26)
1895 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years)
1891 Points +10%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1870 Points +9%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
1820 Points +6%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H
1788 Points +4%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
1718 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1574 Points -8%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
31 fps +48%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years)
23.5 fps +12%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
21 fps
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H
19.4 fps -8%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
19.2 fps -9%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (14.1 - 22.3, n=25)
18.5 fps -12%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18.1 fps -14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
17.5 fps -17%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
59.1 s * -2%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
57.8 s *
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (34.4 - 82.8, n=25)
47.6 s * +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=182, last 2 years)
47.3 s * +18%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
43.4 s * +25%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
39.8 s * +31%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
39 s * +33%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H
38.2 s * +34%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
0.5 sec * -1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4934 sec *
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4541 sec * +8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (0.4052 - 0.723, n=25)
0.4493 sec * +9%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4474 sec * +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years)
0.438 sec * +11%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4155 sec * +16%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
0.3955 sec * +20%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2963 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
219 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
243 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
7254 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
651 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1707 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
19188 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
98.2 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
80.5 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
64.9 pt
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
64.4 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
62.4 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
 
62.2 pt
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
50.8 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
25949 KRay/s +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years)
21760 KRay/s +18%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
18385 KRay/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
16661 KRay/s -9%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (6788 - 19557, n=25)
15135 KRay/s -18%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
14572 KRay/s -21%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
14490 KRay/s -21%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
8265 KRay/s -55%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
129286 Points +42%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years)
106366 Points +17%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
101275 Points +11%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90834 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (22551 - 95579, n=25)
76236 Points -16%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
75514 Points -17%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
73967 Points -19%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
38277 Points -58%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
6338 MB/s +51%
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years)
4885 MB/s +17%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4187 MB/s
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3663 MB/s -13%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
3648 MB/s -13%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (2491 - 4270, n=25)
3561 MB/s -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
3494 MB/s -17%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2931 MB/s -30%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
137876 Points +45%
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years)
116755 Points +23%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
110468 Points +16%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
107042 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (65121 - 120936, n=25)
105169 Points +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
104709 Points +10%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
101642 Points +7%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
95175 Points
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
16073 Points +53%
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years)
13213 Points +26%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
12691 Points +21%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10485 Points
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
9717 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (6108 - 11631, n=25)
9675 Points -8%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9655 Points -8%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
9475 Points -10%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
64736 Points +44%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
55209 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years)
53525 Points +19%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
44967 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (11283 - 48474, n=25)
37712 Points -16%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
36454 Points -19%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
35917 Points -20%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
22873 Points -49%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
149377 MB/s
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
132156 MB/s -12%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
122159 MB/s -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years)
109308 MB/s -27%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
91041 MB/s -39%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (3691 - 149377, n=25)
87238 MB/s -42%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
71470 MB/s -52%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
64725 MB/s -57%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1829 MB/s +53%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years)
1361 MB/s +14%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1192 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (789 - 1254, n=25)
1040 MB/s -13%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
1037 MB/s -13%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
1013 MB/s -15%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
988 MB/s -17%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
883 MB/s -26%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
14066 KRay/s +43%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years)
11721 KRay/s +20%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
9803 KRay/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
8923 KRay/s -9%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (3655 - 10716, n=25)
8215 KRay/s -16%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8017 KRay/s -18%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
7829 KRay/s -20%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4776 KRay/s -51%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49634 MPixel/s +11%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
46642 MPixel/s +5%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
44611 MPixel/s
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
42574 MPixel/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years)
40119 MPixel/s -10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (10871 - 50488, n=25)
39722 MPixel/s -11%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
38990 MPixel/s -13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
27871 MPixel/s -38%

系统性能

在PCMark 10中,我们的Aero与去年的微星CreatorPro Z16P。不幸的是,Aero的生产力得分很低,但它在其他子测试中表现很好。

PCMark 10
PCMark 10
PCMark 10 / Score
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
8058 Points
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
7816 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years)
7791 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (5855 - 8538, n=8)
7664 Points -5%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7609 Points -6%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7455 Points -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
7332 Points -9%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7086 Points -12%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
11683 Points +3%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
11332 Points
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11012 Points -3%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
10945 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years)
10841 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (8835 - 11940, n=8)
10809 Points -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10622 Points -6%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10583 Points -7%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10076 Points +9%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
10050 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years)
9900 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7967 - 10991, n=8)
9840 Points +7%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
9645 Points +4%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9351 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
9332 Points +1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
9231 Points
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
13575 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years)
12077 Points -11%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
11777 Points -13%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7738 - 13575, n=8)
11549 Points -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10790 Points -21%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
10611 Points -22%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10132 Points -25%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9757 Points -28%
CrossMark / Overall
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2127 Points +13%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2113 Points +12%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1932 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=147, last 2 years)
1905 Points +1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1882 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1104 - 1974, n=7)
1815 Points -4%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1789 Points -5%
CrossMark / Productivity
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2031 Points +14%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1969 Points +11%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1823 Points +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=147, last 2 years)
1805 Points +1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1781 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1058 - 1914, n=7)
1720 Points -3%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1677 Points -6%
CrossMark / Creativity
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2390 Points +21%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2161 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=147, last 2 years)
2090 Points +6%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2071 Points +5%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2032 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1178 - 2254, n=7)
1982 Points 0%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1978 Points
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2228 Points +16%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1915 Points
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1891 Points -1%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1865 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=147, last 2 years)
1704 Points -11%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1037 - 1952, n=7)
1650 Points -14%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1486 Points -22%
PCMark 10 Score
8058 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
71596 MB/s +8%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66344 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years)
65204 MB/s -2%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
62711 MB/s -5%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62419 MB/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (37448 - 74486, n=25)
61864 MB/s -7%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
53391 MB/s -20%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
48549 MB/s -27%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
72739 MB/s +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years)
69101 MB/s +1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
68252 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65835 MB/s -4%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
65648 MB/s -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (41599 - 75433, n=25)
62438 MB/s -9%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
61613 MB/s -10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
50338 MB/s -26%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
68170 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years)
66867 MB/s -2%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
65459 MB/s -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (36152 - 88505, n=25)
65109 MB/s -4%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
62746 MB/s -8%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
61981 MB/s -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
55012 MB/s -19%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
50700 MB/s -26%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
107.9 ns * -14%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
101.7 ns * -8%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
95.2 ns * -1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94.4 ns *
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years)
94 ns * -0%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
89.7 ns * +5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (75.8 - 102.3, n=25)
89.3 ns * +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
84.6 ns * +10%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

启动LatencyMon后不久,该软件就检测到了第一个DPC延迟。在启动浏览器和打开多个标签时,这些延迟进一步增加。另一方面,我们的4K/60帧的YouTube视频被流畅地渲染,没有跳帧。

Razer Blade 18 的延迟值甚至比我们的Aero更差。

YouTube测试
YouTube测试
LatencyMon主
LatencyMon主
LatencyMon驱动程序
LatencyMon驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1169.3 μs * -11%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1053.8 μs *
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
623 μs * +41%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
512.3 μs * +51%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
424.1 μs * +60%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
237.9 μs * +77%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

固态硬盘
固态硬盘

该制造商使用自己公司的非常快的PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD。它目前在我们的最佳名单中排名第二

这里的模型并没有完全达到它的最佳性能,特别是由于前辈(排名第一)中的Phison内存要快一点。

至少性能是相对稳定的,而且底板上附有冷却垫,这一点很好。

AS SSD
AS SSD
AS SSD拷贝
AS SSD拷贝
Crystaldiskmark 6
Crystaldiskmark 6
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7051 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4407 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 827 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 757 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 73.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 213 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 724 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1626 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
93.4 pt
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST -8!
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
87.1 pt
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
 
83.8 pt
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
79.9 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
73.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
71.3 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
63 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
54.8 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3889 (3873.65min - 3888.73max) MB/s +54%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3819 (3405.77min - 3819.33max) MB/s +52%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=163, last 2 years)
3478 MB/s +38%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (2519 - 4224, n=10)
3439 MB/s +37%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2519 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2460 (2456.1min - 2460.17max) MB/s -2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1761 (1552.52min - 1761.4max) MB/s -30%
seq write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
4457 MB/s +35%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=163, last 2 years)
3810 MB/s +16%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3798 (3750.39min - 3798.15max) MB/s +15%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3297 (3192.19min - 3296.93max) MB/s 0%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3291 (3216.4min - 3290.77max) MB/s
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (2200 - 4236, n=10)
3133 MB/s -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2991 (2932.66min - 2991.48max) MB/s -9%
seq q8 t1 read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
7028 (6634.28min - 7027.76max) MB/s +1%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (6864 - 7112, n=10)
6974 MB/s +1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
6935 (5510.15min - 6934.86max) MB/s
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6911 (1344.52min - 6911.16max) MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6810 (6260.27min - 6809.87max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=163, last 2 years)
6322 MB/s -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
4633 (4029.05min - 4633.45max) MB/s -33%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5171 (5109.92min - 5170.88max) MB/s +5%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
5004 (4980.32min - 5004.43max) MB/s +2%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4926 (4833.5min - 4926max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=163, last 2 years)
4867 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4426 (4263.58min - 4426.04max) MB/s -10%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (3611 - 4999, n=10)
4259 MB/s -14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3415 (3353.98min - 3415.42max) MB/s -31%
4k q1 t1 read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
88.7 MB/s +33%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (55 - 91, n=10)
75.6 MB/s +13%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
74.5 (73.46min - 74.52max) MB/s +11%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
73.5 (72.63min - 73.49max) MB/s +10%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
66.9 (50.9min - 66.86max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=163, last 2 years)
66 MB/s -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
35.5 (35.31min - 35.47max) MB/s -47%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
373 (371.9min - 373.21max) MB/s +19%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (201 - 391, n=10)
324 MB/s +4%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
313 (306.34min - 313.21max) MB/s
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
280 (267.82min - 279.79max) MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 397, n=163, last 2 years)
222 MB/s -29%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
181.3 (175.93min - 181.25max) MB/s -42%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
144 (137.81min - 144max) MB/s -54%
4k q32 t16 read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3555 (3552.55min - 3555.1max) MB/s +1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3523 (3416.03min - 3522.69max) MB/s
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (3318 - 3583, n=10)
3521 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3203 (3180.36min - 3203.41max) MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=163, last 2 years)
2579 MB/s -27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2025 (1213.07min - 2024.78max) MB/s -43%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
803 (763.32min - 803.25max) MB/s -77%
4k q32 t16 write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3612 (3585.78min - 3612.01max) MB/s 0%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3597 (3488.54min - 3597.4max) MB/s
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (2584 - 3667, n=10)
3502 MB/s -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2291 (2256.15min - 2290.93max) MB/s -36%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2209 (1041.25min - 2208.74max) MB/s -39%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=163, last 2 years)
2132 MB/s -41%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
456 (436.66min - 455.51max) MB/s -87%
AS SSD
Score Total
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
9380 Points +66%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8992 Points +60%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (5636 - 10783, n=10)
8549 Points +52%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7745 Points +37%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=155, last 2 years)
6760 Points +20%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
5903 Points +5%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
5636 Points
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5598 Points -1%
Score Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3634 Points +101%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3490 Points +93%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3378 Points +87%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (1805 - 3629, n=10)
3256 Points +80%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=155, last 2 years)
2452 Points +36%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2348 Points +30%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1805 Points
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1474 Points -18%
Score Write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3991 Points +33%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3941 Points +31%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (2849 - 5339, n=10)
3713 Points +23%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3464 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=155, last 2 years)
3118 Points +4%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3012 Points
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2566 Points -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2404 Points -20%
Seq Read
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
5770.79 MB/s +26%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
5588 MB/s +22%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5251.18 MB/s +15%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (4494 - 5715, n=10)
5048 MB/s +10%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5033 MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=155, last 2 years)
4942 MB/s +8%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4582 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3976.53 MB/s -13%
Seq Write
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3951.34 MB/s +71%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3879 MB/s +68%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=155, last 2 years)
3756 MB/s +63%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3267 MB/s +41%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (1891 - 4476, n=10)
3202 MB/s +39%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3020.8 MB/s +31%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2957.08 MB/s +28%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2310 MB/s
4K Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
109.4 MB/s +78%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (61.3 - 112.1, n=10)
90.5 MB/s +48%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
84 MB/s +37%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
76.65 MB/s +25%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
69.72 MB/s +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=155, last 2 years)
65.3 MB/s +7%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
61.3 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
49.25 MB/s -20%
4K Write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
321.6 MB/s +12%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
288 MB/s
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (206 - 358, n=10)
287 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
241.69 MB/s -16%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
217.2 MB/s -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=155, last 2 years)
212 MB/s -26%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
199.53 MB/s -31%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
152.75 MB/s -47%
4K-64 Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2966 MB/s +131%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2843.31 MB/s +121%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2790.34 MB/s +117%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (1285 - 2964, n=10)
2660 MB/s +107%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1901.41 MB/s +48%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=155, last 2 years)
1887 MB/s +47%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1285 MB/s
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
871.83 MB/s -32%
4K-64 Write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3342 MB/s +34%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3336.29 MB/s +34%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (2403 - 4533, n=10)
3105 MB/s +25%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2968.9 MB/s +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=155, last 2 years)
2533 MB/s +2%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2493 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1949.13 MB/s -22%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1929.02 MB/s -23%
Access Time Read
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (0.028 - 0.094, n=10)
0.0632 ms * -54%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
0.056 ms * -37%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=154, last 2 years)
0.05542 ms * -35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.05 ms * -22%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.041 ms *
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.039 ms * +5%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.026 ms * +37%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.022 ms * +46%
Access Time Write
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.105 ms * -708%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.056 ms * -331%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=155, last 2 years)
0.04837 ms * -272%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.02 ms * -54%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.019 ms * -46%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (0.011 - 0.018, n=10)
0.0135 ms * -4%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.013 ms *
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
0.012 ms * +8%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035070010501400175021002450280031503500385042004550490052505600595063006650Tooltip
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10: Ø6590 (6239.87-6954.51)
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6720 (4344.55-6923.12)

图形卡

说到GPU,你可以选择RTX 4060RTX 4070在我们的测试单元中安装了更强大的变体。在薄型Aero中,它通常消耗约105W。最大是115加25W动态提升,但我们的同事Andreas最近在他的卡评中指出 RTX 4070在100W以上几乎没有任何性能提升。.

在合成3DMarks中,该卡处于预期水平,尽管我们的数据库中没有太多的其他测量结果。毕竟,它是偶尔领先于竞争设备的一个 RTX 3080 Ti,而 前辈它的RTX 3080 Ti也被击败了近20%。 创造者的30%。即使是拥有相同GPU和名义上更快的CPU的Blade 18也略微落后。这款 Alienware x15 R2配有RTX 3080 Ti,则略微领先。

在电池模式下,大量的3D性能丧失,在Fire Strike ,得分下降了近70%!

Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Fire Strike 阿库
Fire Strike 阿库
Time Spy
Time Spy
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
100 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
92 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
91 pt
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
90.3 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
75.9 pt
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
75.4 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
61.2 pt
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
59.2 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=181, last 2 years)
43915 Points +6%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
41480 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (24229 - 46434, n=61)
40495 Points -2%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
39733 Points -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
33988 Points -18%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
33249 Points -20%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
27419 Points -34%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
25990 Points -37%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=192, last 2 years)
31443 Points +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12242 - 33451, n=64)
29065 Points +1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
28885 Points
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
28743 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
25514 Points -12%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
24580 Points -15%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
19710 Points -32%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
19496 Points -33%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=187, last 2 years)
13142 Points +11%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
11798 Points
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
11683 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (5012 - 13391, n=62)
11625 Points -1%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
9488 Points -20%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
9080 Points -23%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
7771 Points -34%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
7320 Points -38%
3DMark 11 Performance
33703 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
55475 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
25526 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
13175 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
12029 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
330 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (63 - 399, n=8, last 2 years)
250 Seconds *
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
74 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
37 Seconds * -76%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
34 Seconds * -62%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (18 - 30, n=61)
21.5 Seconds * -2%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
21 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=175, last 2 years)
20.9 Seconds * -0%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
20 Seconds * +5%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
62 Seconds * -82%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
60 Seconds * -76%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32 - 181, n=64)
40.5 Seconds * -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=181, last 2 years)
36.5 Seconds * -7%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
36 Seconds * -6%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
34 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
376 Seconds * -24%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
339 Seconds * -12%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
315 Seconds * -4%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
304 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=186, last 2 years)
295 Seconds * +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (158 - 440, n=61)
289 Seconds * +5%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
196 Seconds * +36%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

在游戏方面,Aero 16刚刚被超过了刀片18总的来说,只是因为在DOTA 2 Reborn和X-Plane 11.11中的成绩不佳。Aero甚至在GPU重的游戏中也有优势。这很有趣,因为 RTX 4070在Blade中被允许使用140瓦,但在Aero中只有105瓦,这证实了 目前,运行该卡超过100W是没有意义的。.

总的来说,它可以处理所有2K以下的游戏,有时甚至超过2K,尽管该卡在4K的非常苛刻的游戏中有时会耗尽能量。

另一方面,光线追踪性能非常好。在Cyberpunkt中,在1080p下激活光线追踪,它只从大约85帧下降到65帧。

Performance Rating - Percent
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
95.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
92.6 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90.1 pt
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
78.2 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
68.1 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
63 pt
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
62.9 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)
128.3 fps +11%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
116 (48.5P0.1, 82.5P1) fps
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
113.9 (110min) fps -2%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
92.2 (19.1min, 45.8P0.1, 67.7P1) fps -21%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
91 (77min) fps -22%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
70 fps -40%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
59.6 (54min, 56P1) fps -49%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
123.2 (3.96min, 76.9P1) fps
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
121.4 (3.6min, 76.9P1) fps -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=167, last 2 years)
113.8 fps -8%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
113 (20.6min, 76.9P1) fps -8%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
97.6 (9.44min, 66.7P1) fps -21%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
95.3 (6.43min, 66.7P1) fps -23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
85.5 (3.46min, 62.5P1) fps -31%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=179, last 2 years)
120 fps +3%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
116.2 fps
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115.2 fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
85.8 fps -26%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
83.8 fps -28%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
78.2 fps -33%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
64.3 fps -45%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=177, last 2 years)
229 fps +12%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
208 (39.5min, 154.8P1) fps +2%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
204 (39min, 153.9P1) fps
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
162.7 (111.4min, 120.7P1) fps -20%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
151 (35.4min, 116P1) fps -26%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
139.1 (28min, 105.6P1) fps -32%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
108 fps -47%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
178.6 (153.9min) fps +24%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
160 (139.4min) fps +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (33.2 - 220, n=185, last 2 years)
150.6 fps +4%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
147.1 (127.8min) fps +2%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
144.5 (123.6min) fps
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
135.1 (120.3min) fps -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
110 (85.8min) fps -24%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
137.9 fps +20%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115.3 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (31.5 - 166.2, n=191, last 2 years)
108.4 fps -6%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
108 fps -6%
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
97.5 fps -15%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
94.7 fps -18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
55 fps -52%

Aero 16不提供Advanced Optimus,Nvidia的Whisper Mode也是如此。然而,有一个MUX开关,这样你就可以在iGPU和dGPU之间手动切换。

在游戏模式下,Witcher 3 ,一个多小时的帧率是相当稳定的,高于Razer Blade 18.

GPU的功耗几乎恒定在105W左右,这意味着核心时钟(2,350MHz)和内存时钟(2,000MHz)也非常恒定。该卡发热约为80℃。

GPU时钟
GPU时钟
GPU内存时钟
GPU内存时钟
GPU的耗电量
GPU的耗电量
GPU温度
GPU温度

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø113.3 (107-120)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø91.2 (87-96)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø105.4 (98-112)
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU: Ø59.6 (54-68)
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 185.3 186.4 183.1 123.2 90.6 75
The Witcher 3 (2015) 236 116
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 164.7 157 150.9 144.5 128.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 132.3 116.2 84.7 46.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 169.3 148 115.3 98.5
Far Cry 5 (2018) 202 168 159 149 115 55
Strange Brigade (2018) 481 300 237 204 138.8 67.6
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 158 129 70
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) 106 78 41
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 84.75 53.28 19.59
F1 22 (2022) 220 214 173.8 66.6 44.3 21.5
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) 101 72 39
Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022) 90.5 68.9 40.5
The Callisto Protocol (2022) 78.86 59.07 32.96

排放 - Aero 16仍然相当凉爽,但不安静

噪声

纤薄的Aero 16在重压下的游戏模式下变得相当吵。游戏或我们的压力测试导致风扇旋转到55分贝,这比竞争对手的声音大,但考虑到薄的外形因素,这并不令人惊讶。

在创造者模式下,音量从游戏模式的55分贝下降到压力测试的50分贝左右。这使Aero更接近竞争对手,后者有类似的噪音水平。只有会议模式试图让设备真正保持安静。

Noise Level

Idle
23 / 23 / 33.64 dB(A)
Load
51.49 / 55.24 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.930.528.92534.633.834.63141.237.741.24026.629.126.65022.123.622.16328.424.928.48022.324.122.310021.522.621.512521.214.121.216022.414.122.420025.620.925.625026.420.826.431526.413.326.440027.68.927.650029.28.529.263032.4832.480034.27.934.2100034.78.234.7125036.58.436.5160040.29.340.2200039.610.139.6250041.710.241.7315041.210.741.2400041.811.341.8500038.711.738.7630034.111.734.1800029.911.829.91000026.111.926.11250022.111.922.11600018.311.118.3SPL50.423.250.4N6.50.56.5median 29.9median 11.3median 29.9Delta7.72.17.726.429.827.627.926.526.433.641.632.433.734.633.636.334.33434.636.436.326.92928.630.129.526.928.231.93032.628.728.224.331.624.935.121.824.319.31927.220.317.519.319.121.624.522.617.219.120.222.926.52518.120.220.125.628.425.821.220.119.425.930.126.218.119.416.625.931.427.51616.615.329.935.130.914.715.31430.135.532.713.51413.130.336.533.113.413.1133238.233.413.51313.23441.735.713.213.212.936.74539.113.212.912.839.947.742.213.412.812.832.240.934.813.112.812.933.542.635.813.512.913.332.641.535.313.713.313.329.64033.414.113.313.829.441.333.11413.814.128.640.432.414.214.114.327.541.533.714.214.315.330.245.537.115.115.315.526.743.33416.315.513.717.632.625.814.213.713.216.223.720.713.413.225.945.154.54826.225.90.84.99.76.20.80.8median 13.8median 29.6median 40median 33.1median 14.1median 13.81.845.64.71.51.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseGigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSFAsus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Noise
-7%
8%
-1%
5%
4%
off / environment *
23
25
-9%
23.5
-2%
26
-13%
24
-4%
24.1
-5%
Idle Minimum *
23
30
-30%
23.8
-3%
26
-13%
24
-4%
27.1
-18%
Idle Average *
23
32
-39%
23.8
-3%
26
-13%
25
-9%
27.1
-18%
Idle Maximum *
33.64
33
2%
26.8
20%
26
23%
28
17%
27.1
19%
Load Average *
51.49
45
13%
37.3
28%
48
7%
42
18%
42.9
17%
Witcher 3 ultra *
55.27
50
10%
48
13%
50
10%
44
20%
Load Maximum *
55.24
52
6%
53.5
3%
54.6
1%
50
9%
47
15%

* ... smaller is better

温度

尽管它的外壳很薄,但Aero在这个领域表现良好。相对较响的风扇和金属外壳能很好地散热,因此背面的热点保持在50℃以下。前代产品和几个竞争对手在这方面的表现更差。掌托总是在一个舒适的范围内。

Max. Load
 41 °C41 °C39 °C 
 37 °C41 °C36 °C 
 31 °C27 °C31 °C 
Maximum: 41 °C
Average: 36 °C
47 °C45 °C47 °C
35 °C41 °C37 °C
29 °C31 °C31 °C
Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 38.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43 °C | Room Temperature 18 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.8 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).
TheWitcher 3 - 顶部
TheWitcher 3 - 顶部
TheWitcher 3 - 底部
TheWitcher 3 - 底部
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
Heat
-31%
-14%
-17%
-45%
-26%
Maximum Upper Side *
41
49
-20%
39.2
4%
32
22%
54
-32%
56.3
-37%
Maximum Bottom *
47
55
-17%
35.6
24%
41.6
11%
47
-0%
68.3
-45%
Idle Upper Side *
23
33
-43%
31.8
-38%
32.6
-42%
40
-74%
25.2
-10%
Idle Bottom *
23
33
-43%
33.2
-44%
36
-57%
40
-74%
25.9
-13%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

在压力测试中,CPU能够在短时间内消耗105W,然后在几秒钟后下降到恒定的62W。同时,时钟以4.1 GHz的速度短暂启动,然后下降到2.9 GHz左右。然而,这并不是保持恒定,而是随着温度的变化而波动。当核心温度达到90°C时,时钟被轻微节流,之后温度再次下降。在刚刚超过80°C时,时钟速率又会略微上升,等等。

GPU时钟也在1.7和2.4GHz之间连续波动。相比之下,内存时钟从2GHz上升到1.75GHz,然后下降。同样的波形在GPU温度中也很明显,它大致在70-80℃之间波动。在压力测试中,功耗从未达到最大值,但仅在67W左右徘徊。

CPU时钟
CPU时钟
CPU时钟
CPU时钟
CPU温度
CPU温度
CPU温度
CPU温度
CPU功耗
CPU功耗
GPU的耗电量
GPU的耗电量
CPU时钟(GHz) GPU时钟(MHz) CPU平均温度(℃) GPU平均温度(℃)
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 2,9 1.990 84 76
Witcher 3 应力 1,8 2.350 69 80

发言人

扬声器位于前角
扬声器位于前角

Gigabyte安装了两个立体声扬声器,每个2W,这通常是标准的。不幸的是,这些扬声器在任何学科上都没有真正的说服力:它们的声音还算响亮,但无法提供均衡的中音或高音。

除了数字输出外,3.5毫米的耳机插槽可用于外部设备。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.936.929.9253638.2363138.743.338.7402832.2285023.929.623.96326.128.126.18025.227.825.210024.82624.81252922.52916037.623.337.620042.626.942.625047.129.447.131548.228.848.240051.729.151.750055.530.455.563066.830.566.880075.131.175.1100073.729.773.7125070.42570.4160066.72766.7200068.926.168.9250069.326.669.3315071.226.271.2400073.823.673.8500064.321.264.3630053.920.153.980004716.7471000046.913.846.91250047.412.747.41600032.811.532.8SPL81.738.681.7N46.1346.1median 53.9median 26.1median 53.9Delta12.94.812.936.226.536.238.234.638.23936.43936.529.536.534.128.734.134.521.834.549.417.549.456.317.256.359.218.159.258.421.258.456.918.156.967.21667.275.214.775.279.413.579.475.513.475.577.113.577.177.813.277.875.913.275.975.413.475.480.713.180.779.613.579.68013.78078.214.178.283.91483.985.914.285.986.414.286.487.615.187.688.316.388.378.314.278.369.513.469.594.826.294.8112.20.8112.2median 78.2median 14.1median 78.25.91.55.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSFAsus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 12.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (16.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (48.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 100% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理--Aero 16中的高效RTX 4070

消耗功率

Chicony公司的240瓦电源装置
Chicony公司的240瓦电源装置

能源消耗非常好,特别是与前代相比。在前代产品中,耗电量大的 RTX 3080 Ti在游戏基准测试中,你可以看到旧卡的性能明显变差,而消耗的能量明显增加。新的RTX 40x一代显然要高效得多。更多关于 更多关于新RTX 40x一代的效率的信息可以在这里找到.

当使用Witcher 3 ,平均消耗量约为158W。Chicony的中型标准电源的额定功率为240W,在压力测试中能很好地应对高达192W的负载峰值。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.2 / 4 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 11.8 / 16.1 / 17 Watt
Load midlight 100.6 / 192 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, OLED, 3840x2400, 16"
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Phison ESR01TBMFCT, AMOLED, 3840x2400, 16"
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 2560x1600, 18"
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 3840x2400, 16"
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, IPS-Level, 1920x1200, 16"
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-64%
-84%
4%
14%
2%
-14%
-25%
Idle Minimum *
11.8
26
-120%
24.5
-108%
11.1
6%
8
32%
10.8
8%
12.4 ?(4.3 - 31, n=52)
-5%
Idle Average *
16.1
30
-86%
34.1
-112%
11.4
29%
11
32%
16.3
-1%
Idle Maximum *
17
37
-118%
47.7
-181%
14.4
15%
16
6%
16.9
1%
24.2 ?(9 - 55.4, n=52)
-42%
Load Average *
100.6
127
-26%
140
-39%
137.4
-37%
97
4%
111.7
-11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
158
176
-11%
202
-28%
136
14%
161.5
-2%
152.1
4%
Load Maximum *
192
236
-23%
261
-36%
197
-3%
168
12%
177.4
8%
223 ?(107 - 319, n=52)
-16%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress Test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255Tooltip
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø158.5 (151.96-174.25)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø175.7 (168-184)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø202 (195.8-215)
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø175.5 (103.72-192.16)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø184 (181-199)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø214 (164.2-261)
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø16.1 (10.75-20.644)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø27.1 (25.5-29.7)

Power Consumption with an External Monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø107 (95.65-152.85)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø126.2 (124-134)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø205 (199-216)
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø153.3 (151.16-155.33)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø142.6 (139-150)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø204 (201-210)
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø157.2 (148.52-172.69)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø170.4 (167-184)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø198.8 (181.6-228)
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø158.6 (152.66-167.99)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø170.4 (166-176)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø194.2 (190.3-223)
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø12.5 (5.9317-18.857)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø25.1 (22.7-44.2)

电池寿命

电池运行时间在很大程度上取决于所选择的模式,明亮的OLED屏幕也会耗费相当多的电量。这款笔记本电脑仍然有一个88Wh的电池。由于整体消耗较低,通过精心选择的节能模式,可以实现更长的运行时间。

当在降低亮度的情况下看电影或上网时,我们每个人都能得到不到7.5小时的时间,这是一个不错的价值。Gigabyte在这里自动激活了节能模式。在最大亮度下,运行时间下降到5.5小时。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
7h 28min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
5h 30min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 22min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 06min
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 88 Wh
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 87 Wh
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.98 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-19%
-36%
-7%
-2%
-12%
-18%
H.264
442
345
-22%
559
26%
490
11%
452
2%
WiFi v1.3
448
362.5
-19%
310
-31%
469
5%
344
-23%
381
-15%
Load
126
58
-54%
62
-51%
133
6%
96
-24%
Reader / Idle
749
533

Pros

+ 薄而稳定的金属外壳
+ 3个USB-C (包括2个Thunderbolt 4)
+ 易于维护
+ 16英寸OLED显示屏,HDR600
+ 控制中心有很多手动选项
+ 高CPU和GPU性能
+ 相当凉爽和经济

Cons

- 高价
- 只有60赫兹显示
- 在游戏模式下声音很大
- 驱动延迟仍然很高
- 扬声器相当弱

评语--离目标更近了一步

Gigabyte Aero 16 OLED BMF,由Gigabyte提供。
Gigabyte Aero 16 OLED BMF,由Gigabyte提供。

到目前为止,高性能的笔记本电脑往往是大的、响的和热的,使它们适合于游戏者或创造者,这取决于设计。在未来,我们最希望的是静音、凉爽,如果需要的话,是小型的移动笔记本电脑。Aero是朝着这个方向迈出的良好一步,尽管目前的技术还远非理想。

Aero的性能比其更厚的前辈与 RTX 3080 Ti(也只有105W),但其高效的 RTX 4070消耗明显更少,并保持更冷,尽管不是更安静。如果你正在寻找谨慎,你会从控制中心的许多电源模式和手动设置选项中受益。这使你能够使Aero的性能和排放适应各自的情况或环境。由于目前Aero在 "游戏 "评级类别中的得分(88%)比在 "多媒体 "类别中的得分(86%)要高,我们将其评为游戏笔记本。

游戏玩家可能会对本来很好的OLED显示屏只能在60赫兹下运行这一事实感到困扰。否则,所有其他的批评点,如不平衡的扬声器,都相对温和。

Aero 16 OLED不仅有一个很好的屏幕,而且特别薄,由于高效的RTX 4070,也很强大,但又相对经济和冷静。

竞争者从不睡觉,也在探索新的RTX 40x代的可能性。到目前为止,我们只评测了几款,所以替代品仍然很少。

价格和可用性

有兴趣的买家可以直接通过Gigabyte的官方产品页面进行查询。在这里,你点击购买,并从下拉列表中选择你相应的地区和国家。然后你会被转到一个可能在你的国家列出该笔记本电脑的在线商店列表。

例如,在美国,亚马逊列出了技嘉Aero 16 OLED的两个配置,即一个是i9-13900H和32GB RAM,另一个是i7-13700H和16GB RAM。两者都是US$2.299,00US$2.099,00,分别为2.299,00美元和2.099,00美元。当然,这并不代表全球供应情况,可能会因地区和运输因素而有所波动。

价格截至12.03.2023,可能会有变化。

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF - 03/13/2023 v7 (old)
Christian Hintze

Chassis
88 / 98 → 90%
Keyboard
74%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
65 / 80 → 82%
Weight
62 / 10-66 → 94%
Battery
74 / 95 → 78%
Display
90%
Games Performance
99%
Application Performance
96%
Temperature
89 / 95 → 93%
Noise
70 / 90 → 78%
Audio
54%
Camera
46 / 85 → 54%
Average
77%
86%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 纤薄的技嘉AERO 16 OLED笔记本电脑回顾。高效的RTX 4070,适合游戏玩家和创作者
Christian Hintze, 2023-03-13 (Update: 2023-03-13)