Notebookcheck Logo

Razer Blade 18笔记本电脑回顾。比许多17英寸游戏笔记本更小

140 WGeForce RTX 4070图形。

宽敞的18英寸Blade 18在市场上被作为台式机的替代品,没有台式机的外形因素。然而,你必须真正重视大屏幕,因为性能和功能与更小、更便携的Blade 16几乎没有区别。
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Raptor Lake Thunderbolt

在2023年的CES上亮相的Blade 18提供了迄今为止最大的屏幕尺寸的Blade笔记本电脑,同时采用了熟悉的Razer机箱设计。该模型的推出与移动13代英特尔酷睿系列和移动NvidiaGeForce 40 Ada Lovelace系列的推出相吻合,这与最近的 刀锋16.

配置范围从Core i9-13950HX CPU和140 WGeForce RTX 4060 GPU到Core i9-13980HX和175 W RTX 4090。所有配置都配备了相同的16:10 QHD+ 240 Hz IPS面板。我们的具体审查单位是一个中间配置的运动,140 W RTX 4070的零售价约为3200美元。

18英寸笔记本电脑并不常见,6年前的微星GT83 Titan 是一个明显的例子。华硕和戴尔预计将分别推出ROG Strix Scar 18Alienware m18 ,直接与雷蛇Blade 18竞争。

更多Razer评论。

Razer Blade 18 2023年的配置(来源:Razer)。
Razer Blade 18 2023年的配置(来源:Razer)。
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 (Blade 18 2023 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-13950HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.5 GHz, 141 W PL2 / Short Burst, 114 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1980 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP, GDDR6, 528.49, Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, SK Hynix DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, 2x SODIMM, 46-45-45-89
Display
18.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 168 PPI, AU Optronics B180QAN01.0, IPS, AUO46A7, glossy: no, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Storage
SSSTC CA6-8D1024, 1024 GB 
Soundcard
Intel Raptor Lake-S PCH - cAVS
Connections
5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headset, Card Reader: SD
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 21.9 x 399.9 x 275.4
Battery
91.7 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 1920p30
Primary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 2x tweeters, 4x subwoofers, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Razer Synapse, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
3.029 kg, Power Supply: 804 g
Price
3200 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
91.4 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3 kg21.9 mm18.00"2560x1600
Alternative specs USD 3,199.99
89.9 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.8 kg19.9 mm17.30"3840x2160
Alternative specs USD 2,117.01
89 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
3.5 kg23 mm17.30"3840x2160
Alternative specs USD 3,495.00
83.3 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2023
Gigabyte G7 KE
i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.6 kg25 mm17.30"1920x1080
from EUR 1199
86.1 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2023
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
3.4 kg26.7 mm17.00"3840x2160
Alternative specs USD 1,555.49
86.9 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2022
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.9 kg28.3 mm17.30"2560x1440
Alternative specs USD 1,880.49

外壳 - 几乎不比刀锋17大

刀锋18可能是一个新的屏幕尺寸,但它在机身设计方面没有新的惊喜。该机型看起来和感觉就像 刀锋17从顶部到底部。最大的视觉差异是,与刀锋17相比,刀锋18的下巴边框小得多,屏幕与身体的比例更高。

值得庆幸的是,更大的18英寸外形尺寸并不影响机箱的刚性。底座和盖子都和Blade 17一样坚固,给人以类似MacBook Pro的强烈印象。特别是铰链,尽管有大屏幕,但其最大角度仍远低于180度。笔记本电脑上最薄弱的地方可能是外盖的最中央,那里的表面更容易因施加压力而变形。

Razer自豪地指出,尽管它们的屏幕尺寸不同,但Blade 18的体积只比2022年的Blade 17大18%,重7%。因此,新的18英寸机型并不像人们最初预期的那样感觉笨重。事实上,一些17.3英寸游戏笔记本比Blade 18更大甚至更重,包括华硕ROG Strix Scar 17 SEAlienware m17 R5.

熟悉的铝合金一体式机身设计
熟悉的铝合金一体式机身设计
光滑的黑色金属表面周围很容易积累指纹。
光滑的黑色金属表面周围很容易积累指纹。
盖子打开到最大角度~140度
盖子打开到最大角度~140度
隐藏在条形铰链下面的通风格栅
隐藏在条形铰链下面的通风格栅
模型比刀片17厚2毫米
模型比刀片17厚2毫米
网络摄像头没有隐私快门
网络摄像头没有隐私快门

尺寸比较

397.3 mm 298.71 mm 26.7 mm 3.4 kg395 mm 282 mm 28.3 mm 2.9 kg397 mm 262 mm 25 mm 2.6 kg399.9 mm 275.4 mm 21.9 mm 3 kg397 mm 330 mm 23 mm 3.5 kg395 mm 260 mm 19.9 mm 2.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性--通常情况下

新机型继承了Blade 17的所有端口,提供了健康的连接选项。即便如此,我们还是希望看到更多的东西,以更好地将Blade 18与它的小兄弟姐妹区分开来。例如,一个HDMI输入端口将为宽敞的18英寸屏幕增加更多的功能。

请记住,两个USB-C端口中只有一个与Thunderbolt设备兼容。

前面。没有端口
前面。没有端口
右边。SD读卡器,USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2 w/ Thunderbolt 4 + Power Delivery + DisplayPort 1.4,USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2,HDMI 2.1,Kensington锁
右边。SD读卡器,USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2 w/ Thunderbolt 4 + Power Delivery + DisplayPort 1.4,USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2,HDMI 2.1,Kensington锁
后方。没有端口
后方。没有端口
左边:AC适配器,2.5Gbps RJ-45,2个USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2,USB-C w/ Power Delivery + DisplayPort 1.4,3.5mm耳机
左边:AC适配器,2.5Gbps RJ-45,2个USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2,USB-C w/ Power Delivery + DisplayPort 1.4,3.5mm耳机

SD卡阅读器

我们能够在短短5秒内将1GB的图片从我们的UHS-II测试卡转移到桌面上,而在微星Titan GT77上则需要13秒。微星泰坦GT77.

弹簧式的SD卡读卡器。插入的卡仍然从边缘略微凸出
弹簧式的SD卡读卡器。插入的卡仍然从边缘略微凸出
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)
202 MB/s
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
152 MB/s -25%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
125 MB/s -38%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)
83.5 MB/s -59%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)
207.8 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
207.6 MB/s 0%
Gigabyte G7 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
89 MB/s -57%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)
86.2 MB/s -59%

沟通

英特尔AX211是Wi-Fi 6E和蓝牙5.3连接的标准配置,而相比之下,Blade 17搭载的是Killer AX1690i。Killer AX1690i是英特尔AX211的游戏专用衍生产品,因此用户不应该看到两者之间有任何明显的性能差异。

可拆卸的WLAN模块
可拆卸的WLAN模块
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1645 (1589min - 1741max) MBit/s +34%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1230 (1091min - 1327max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1732 (1685min - 1744max) MBit/s +14%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1516 (769min - 1565max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1672 (864min - 1737max) MBit/s +23%
Gigabyte G7 KE
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1655 (1627min - 1681max) MBit/s +22%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1545 (1508min, 1510.9P1 - 1569max) MBit/s +13%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1362 (1249min - 1437max) MBit/s
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
MediaTek MT7921
968 MBit/s -29%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Gigabyte G7 KE
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1636 (1591min - 1674max) MBit/s +37%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1582 (1517min, 1518.74P1 - 1636max) MBit/s +32%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1196 (618min - 1298max) MBit/s
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
MediaTek MT7921
981 MBit/s -18%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550Tooltip
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1230 (1091-1327)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1371 (1036-1505)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1490 (769-1565)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1494 (1283-1580)

网络摄像头 - 现在有5MP

Razer已经将网络摄像头从Blade 17的200万像素升级到Blade 18的500万像素。我们完全期待制造商在不久的将来开始用同样的500万像素传感器更新其较小的刀片型号。使用500万像素传感器的图像更清晰,而颜色没有什么变化。红外线是支持Windows Hello的标准配置。

奇怪的是,没有物理网络摄像头隐私快门,尽管 刀片16纳入了一个。甚至没有一个数字杀毒开关或热键。

ColorChecker
11.4 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
19 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070: 12.92 ∆E min: 1.53 - max: 21.18 ∆E

维护

底部面板由十个T5 Torx螺钉固定,便于维修。用户可以直接访问两个M.2 2280固态硬盘插槽,两个SODIMM插槽,最多可容纳32GB DDR5-5600或64GB DDR5-5200,以及可拆卸的WLAN模块。最值得注意的是,目前的Blade 18设计在点击板的正下方加入了一个额外的风扇,与旧的Blade 17设计类似。

刀片18 2023年初
刀片18 2023年初
刀片17 2021用于比较
刀片17 2021用于比较

配件和保修

零售箱中没有任何额外的东西。制造商提供一年的有限保修,如果在美国购买,内部电池有单独的两年保修。

输入设备 - 与刀片16相同

键盘和触摸板

尽管两款机型的屏幕尺寸不同,但键盘和点击板都与Blade 16相同。甚至连点击板(17 x 9.7厘米)和键盘的尺寸都没有改变,因此我们的 现有评论所以我们对Blade 16打字体验的评论在Blade 18上也适用。太糟糕的是,Razer没有利用额外的表面积来设置更大的方向键或潜在的小键盘。

熟悉的Razer Blade键盘,每键RGB照明
熟悉的Razer Blade键盘,每键RGB照明
雷蛇决定增加更大的扬声器而不是集成的数字键盘
雷蛇决定增加更大的扬声器而不是集成的数字键盘
Precision 玻璃点击板比Blade 17上的大50%。
Precision 玻璃点击板比Blade 17上的大50%。
按键仍然很浅,无论好坏,反馈都很一般。
按键仍然很浅,无论好坏,反馈都很一般。

显示器 - 非常宽敞

刀锋18在推出时没有第二个面板选项,可能是因为供应有限。事实上,18.0英寸的华硕ROG Strix Scar 18可能将使用与Blade 18相同的AU Optronics B180QAN01.0 IPS面板。也就是说,这仍然是一个高质量的面板,具有高端游戏笔记本电脑上常见的功能,包括快速的240赫兹原生刷新率,快速的3毫秒响应时间,完整的DCI-P3色彩覆盖,500尼特的亮度,以及工厂校准。我们用X-Rite色度计和示波器进行的独立测量已经证实了这些说法。

不幸的是,我们的测试装置上的显示器偶尔会在不同的亮度水平之间闪烁,似乎没有任何理由。这种闪烁与脉宽调制无关,因为该面板没有利用PWM进行亮度控制。这可能是屏幕的故障,但我们还不能确认它是软件还是硬件问题。据称,,一些已经购买刀片18的消费者已经购买了Blade 18的消费者也遇到了类似的闪烁问题。一旦我们得到Razer的官方消息,本节将被更新。

没有边到边的玻璃、OLED或触摸屏选项
没有边到边的玻璃、OLED或触摸屏选项
雷蛇宣传侧边框仅4.66毫米薄
雷蛇宣传侧边框仅4.66毫米薄
最小的不均匀背光渗漏
最小的不均匀背光渗漏
具有最小颗粒度的RGB子像素
具有最小颗粒度的RGB子像素
527.9
cd/m²
546.1
cd/m²
520
cd/m²
510.7
cd/m²
549.6
cd/m²
491.5
cd/m²
534.1
cd/m²
544.9
cd/m²
490.3
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B180QAN01.0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 549.6 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 523.9 cd/m² Minimum: 27.69 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 549.6 cd/m²
Contrast: 1037:1 (Black: 0.53 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.32 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88, calibrated: 2.7
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
85.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
AU Optronics B180QAN01.0, IPS, 2560x1600, 18"
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
AU Optronics B173ZAN06.9, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
B173ZAN06.C, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Gigabyte G7 KE
AU Optronics B173HAN05.1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AU Optronics AUODBA3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17"
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NE173QHM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
Display
2%
2%
-14%
1%
-0%
Display P3 Coverage
96.9
99.4
3%
94.9
-2%
70.4
-27%
97.2
0%
97.1
0%
sRGB Coverage
99.8
100
0%
99.9
0%
99.8
0%
99.6
0%
99.9
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
85.3
87.3
2%
92.4
8%
71.7
-16%
88.4
4%
84.8
-1%
Response Times
-25%
-524%
-12%
-168%
-31%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
4.2 ?(2.1, 2.1)
7.5 ?(2.1, 5.4)
-79%
38.4 ?(13.6, 24.8, n)
-814%
5 ?(2.1, 2.9)
-19%
16.4 ?(7.8, 8.6)
-290%
5.7 ?(2.7, 3)
-36%
Response Time Black / White *
8 ?(3.8, 4.2)
5.6 ?(1.6, 4)
30%
26.6 ?(9.2, 17.4, n)
-233%
8.3 ?(4.2, 4.1)
-4%
11.6 ?(6.2, 5.4)
-45%
10.1 ?(5, 5.1)
-26%
PWM Frequency
2380 ?(100)
Screen
24%
64905%
19%
-40%
16%
Brightness middle
549.6
503
-8%
606
10%
307
-44%
484
-12%
320
-42%
Brightness
524
486
-7%
602
15%
301
-43%
449
-14%
303
-42%
Brightness Distribution
89
84
-6%
93
4%
93
4%
87
-2%
87
-2%
Black Level *
0.53
0.44
17%
0.0001
100%
0.2
62%
0.55
-4%
0.3
43%
Contrast
1037
1143
10%
6060000
584278%
1535
48%
880
-15%
1067
3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.32
1.08
67%
4.8
-45%
1.32
60%
4.8
-45%
1.1
67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.63
4.54
32%
8.2
-24%
4.6
31%
7.48
-13%
2.7
59%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.7
0.6
78%
1.8
33%
1.03
62%
4.74
-76%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2
1.3
35%
6.5
-225%
2.1
-5%
5.5
-175%
1.1
45%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.151 102%
2.63 84%
2.247 98%
2.42 91%
2.13 103%
CCT
6319 103%
6541 99%
6596 99%
6815 95%
6148 106%
6599 98%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
0% / 12%
21461% / 41650%
-2% / 8%
-69% / -49%
-5% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. P3
vs. P3

平均灰度和彩色deltaE值分别只有2.0和3.32,因为该面板是根据P3标准预先校准的。试图自己进一步校准面板不会使颜色有明显的改善。然而,蓝色似乎比任何其他原色或次要颜色表现得更不准确。

校准前的灰度(相对于P3)。
校准前的灰度(相对于P3)。
校准前的饱和扫频(对P3)。
校准前的饱和扫频(对P3)。
校准前的ColorChecker(对P3)。
校准前的ColorChecker(对P3)。
校准后的灰度
校准后的灰度
校准后的饱和扫频
校准后的饱和扫频
校准后的ColorChecker
校准后的ColorChecker

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.8 ms rise
↘ 4.2 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.1 ms rise
↘ 2.1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8527 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

室外能见度与Blade 17相似,因为它们的显示屏都以500尼特的最大值为目标。为了获得最佳色彩并尽可能减少眩光,始终建议使用阴凉处。

阴天的室外
阴天的室外
在户外的阴凉处
在户外的阴凉处
阴天的室外
阴天的室外

可视角度很宽,正如IPS面板所预期的那样。只有在从极端角度观看时,颜色和对比度才会发生变化。

性能--英特尔猛禽湖+英伟达艾达-洛夫莱斯

 
 

测试条件

我们通过Windows将我们的设备设置为性能模式,并通过Razer Synapse软件将CPU和GPU分别设置为Boost和High,如下图所示。建议用户熟悉Synapse,因为它是调整任何RGB照明效果、性能配置文件、宏和其他辅助功能的枢纽。不幸的是,该软件并不总是可靠的,因为如果没有互联网连接,它有时会变得无反应或根本不启动。

与Blade 16不同,Blade 18不支持MUX或Advanced Optimus。我们的设备也不支持G-Sync,尽管Razer正在宣传。我们已经就缺乏G-Sync的问题联系了雷蛇,并将在适当时候更新本节。

处理器

CPU性能仅在刀片16或GT77的几个百分点之内,两者都配备了相同的 Core i9-13950HX处理器。因此,这里的CPU似乎没有受到任何重大的节流问题的影响。多线程性能大约比上一代产品快45%。酷睿i9-12950HX以与库存的台式机相提并论 酷睿i9-12900K.在这方面,基因对基因的性能飞跃是很重要的。

我们通常的CineBench R15 xT循环测试结果不包括在下面,因为分数异常低,不能代表处理器的性能。运行CineBench R15会同时激活CPU和dGPU,因此CPU的性能有时会受到dGPU的功率限制。这个问题在其他一些笔记本电脑上也可以观察到。CineBench R23是一个纯粹的CPU基准测试,不激活dGPU,因此下面提供这些结果。

Cinebench R23 Multi Loop

014352870430557407175861010045114801291514350157851722018655200902152522960243952583027265Tooltip
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø27455 (25585.533-28680.87)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø26405 (22394.109-26736.093)
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø15985 (15585.948-17075.002)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
86.8 pt
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
82.6 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
 
82 pt
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K
77.9 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
76.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
67.5 pt
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H
57.9 pt
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H
56.9 pt
Gigabyte G7 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
53 pt
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H
50.9 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
50.9 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
50.7 pt
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
50.4 pt
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E -2!
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.2 pt
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
4481 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
284 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
297 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
10919 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
797 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2076 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
28681 Points
Help
Performance Rating
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
96.4 pt
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90.5 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
 
89.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
68.7 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
60.1 pt
Gigabyte G7 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
49.6 pt
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
34 pt

系统性能

PCMark 10的得分一直高于在 2022年的Blade 17即使差距不大。而 刀片16和微星GT77的得分更高,因为它们分别拥有更快的RTX 4080和4090 GPU。

PCMark 10 / Score
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8884 Points +17%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7609 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (n=1)
7609 Points 0%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7292 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7208 Points -5%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7139 Points -6%
Gigabyte G7 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
6126 Points -19%
PCMark 10 Score
7609 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77096 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (61938 - 78494, n=7)
73266 MB/s -5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
63863 MB/s -17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
63831 MB/s -17%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
60030 MB/s -22%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
50334 MB/s -35%
Gigabyte G7 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
44994 MB/s -42%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

LatencyMon显示,在打开我们的主页的多个浏览器标签时有轻微的DPC问题。在60FPS下的4K视频播放是完美的,CPU和GPU利用率都很低。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4710.9 μs * -303%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3413 μs * -192%
Gigabyte G7 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1969.3 μs * -68%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1366.3 μs * -17%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1169.3 μs *
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
388.5 μs * +67%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备 - 多达两个固态硬盘

我们的测试装置配备了相同的 1TB SSTC CA6-8D1024的PCIe4 x4 NVMe SSD。 搭配的固态硬盘。.传输速率与流行的三星PM9A1相当,稳定的连续读取和写入速率分别接近6900MB/s和4300MB/s。Razer为两个固态硬盘插槽各配备了一个散热垫,将热量散发到金属底板上。

AS SSD
AS SSD
CDM 8
CDM 8
主要的M.2 2280 PCIe4 x4插槽
主要的M.2 2280 PCIe4 x4插槽
未被占用的二级M.2插槽
未被占用的二级M.2插槽
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6852 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4399 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 739.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 658.1 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 4125 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 4104 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 75.97 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 276.2 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
80.2 pt
Gigabyte G7 KE
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
75.4 pt
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
72.2 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
67.3 pt
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
66.5 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
44 pt

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

034569010351380172520702415276031053450379541404485483051755520586562106555Tooltip
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070: Ø6845 (5855.67-6875.3)

GPU性能--与台式机GeForce RTX 3070性能相似

140瓦的移动GeForce RTX 4070 舒适地坐落在 移动RTX 3080移动RTX 3080 Ti在原始性能方面。它只比即将推出的RTX3070快10%到20%。 移动RTX 3070然而,考虑到以下情况,这有点令人失望 移动RTX 4080比移动RTX 3080快40%到50%。 移动RTX 3080.这意味着移动RTX 4070和移动RTX 4080之间的性能差距在40%至60%时更为显著。

与桌面GPU相比,移动RTX 4070比桌面RTX 3070慢了约5%至10%。 桌面RTX 3070的速度要慢5%到10%。

GeForce 40 GPU的一大卖点是支持帧生成或DLSS 3。不幸的是,我们的Blade 18 RTX 4070测试装置在外部HDMI或USB-C 4K显示器上运行支持DLSS 3的游戏时,会出现问题。在所有测试的游戏中,帧率会无缘无故地下降到<30 FPS范围,而Blade 16 RTX 4080则没有这样的问题。奇怪的是,DLSS 3在内部Blade 18显示器上运行完全正常。我们已经与Razer联系,寻求潜在的解决方案,并将在适当时候更新本节。然而,就目前而言,如果启用DLSS 3,你会想在内部显示器上玩游戏。

在接下来的日子里,将对其他游戏进行基准测试。

Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Fire Strike 超强
Fire Strike 超强
速度之道
速度之道
Time Spy
Time Spy
Time Spy 极端
Time Spy 极端
皇家港
皇家港
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
100 pt
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
80.7 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
79.6 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
64.8 pt
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
48.2 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) -3!
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
47.5 pt
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
46.7 pt
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
44.7 pt
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
42.3 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
42.3 pt
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
35.8 pt
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
31.8 pt
MSI GL75 10SFR -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
28.4 pt
3DMark 11 Performance
34754 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
26019 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
12062 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
77 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
33 Seconds * -65%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
26 Seconds * -30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
23 Seconds * -15%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
20 Seconds *
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
15 Seconds * +25%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
12 Seconds * +40%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
11 Seconds * +45%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
9 Seconds * +55%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
53 Seconds * -47%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
45 Seconds * -25%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
36 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
34 Seconds * +6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
22 Seconds * +39%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
17 Seconds * +53%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
399 Seconds * -104%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
369 Seconds * -88%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
329 Seconds * -68%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
301 Seconds * -54%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
207 Seconds * -6%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
196 Seconds *
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
175 Seconds * +11%

* ... smaller is better

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1280x720 Lite Quality
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
236 fps +2%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
235 fps +2%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
231 fps
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
230 fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (108.6 - 231, n=41)
202 fps -13%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
195.8 fps -15%
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
190 fps -18%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
186.3 fps -19%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
181 fps -22%
Gigabyte G7 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
180.4 fps -22%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
155.9 fps -33%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
238 fps +43%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
235 fps +41%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
221 fps +32%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
184.1 fps +10%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
166.9 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (84 - 185.9, n=56)
152.5 fps -9%
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
148 fps -11%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
139.3 fps -17%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
134 fps -20%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
118.5 fps -29%
Gigabyte G7 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
112.4 fps -33%
1920x1080 High Quality
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
225 fps +95%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
207 fps +80%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
187.4 fps +63%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
157.8 fps +37%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115.2 fps
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
115 fps 0%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
113.6 fps -1%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
112.2 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (41 - 131.9, n=64)
111 fps -4%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
106 fps -8%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
89.7 fps -22%
Gigabyte G7 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
84.7 fps -26%
2560x1440 High Quality
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
195.7 fps +139%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
163.3 fps +99%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
162.9 fps +99%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
120.1 fps +46%
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
93.9 fps +15%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
90.8 fps +11%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
84.5 fps +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32.5 - 119.9, n=56)
82.4 fps 0%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82 fps
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
81.8 fps 0%
3840x2160 High Quality
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
116.9 fps +151%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
94.7 fps +103%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
87.1 fps +87%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
74.1 fps +59%
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
56.9 fps +22%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
55.2 fps +18%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
50.8 fps +9%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
48.8 fps +5%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
46.6 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (26.6 - 52.8, n=22)
46 fps -1%

怠速运行 Witcher 3 一小时将返回稳定的帧率,没有反复的性能下降,表明没有中断后台应用程序或重大节流。

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø105.4 (98-112)
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 186.1 184.7 181.6 121.4 87.6 88.5
The Witcher 3 (2015) 617 405.9 240.9 113.9 72.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 225 200 191 178.6 145.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 231 166.9 115.2 82 46.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 203 178.9 137.9 117.7
Strange Brigade (2018) 464 315 243 208 136.7 71.9
Metro Exodus (2019) 208.9 139.8 109.7 86.8 69 44
Borderlands 3 (2019) 258.5 200.1 131.8 100.3 68.7 35.7
Hitman 3 (2021) 294.3 234 208.4 197.4 129.9 68.5
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 147.8 125.7 111.5 92.1 54 23.3

排放

系统噪音 - 不玩游戏时很安静

在运行视频流或网络浏览等要求不高的负载时,内部风扇很安静。风扇的噪音通常徘徊在27dB(A)以下,而静音背景为23.5dB(A),在大多数情况下基本上听不到。考虑到木头下面的巨大尺寸和马力,这比预期的要安静。

运行更高的负载,如游戏,在稳定在48 dB(A)之前,风扇转速会缓慢而稳定地增加。如果压力达到100%的利用率,风扇噪音甚至可能达到54 dB(A)。50分贝(A)的低范围是大多数游戏笔记本电脑的典型特征,包括 GT77 或Razer自己的Blade 17。尽管尺寸不同,但Blade 18在游戏时的噪音与它的小兄弟姐妹一样大。

冷却解决方案包括3个风扇(2个60毫米+1个35毫米),蒸汽室冷却器,石墨和PET。
冷却解决方案包括3个风扇(2个60毫米+1个35毫米),蒸汽室冷却器,石墨和PET。
与Alienware、微星或华硕不同,Razer没有利用液态金属、相位变化或任何特殊的散热膏。
与Alienware、微星或华硕不同,Razer没有利用液态金属、相位变化或任何特殊的散热膏。
刀锋18是少数拥有两个以上内部风扇的游戏笔记本电脑之一
刀锋18是少数拥有两个以上内部风扇的游戏笔记本电脑之一
2个DDR5 SODIMM插槽
2个DDR5 SODIMM插槽
风扇噪音曲线(白色。背景,红色。系统空闲,蓝色:3DMark 06,橙色。Witcher 3,绿色。Prime95+FurMark压力)
风扇噪音曲线(白色。背景,红色。系统空闲,蓝色:3DMark 06,橙色。Witcher 3,绿色。Prime95+FurMark压力)

Noise Level

Idle
23.8 / 23.8 / 26.8 dB(A)
Load
37.3 / 53.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23.5 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.941.838.738382531.629.13129.628.6312626.125.826.927.44026.925.624.826.527.85026.824.524.525.127.9632624.924.124.7278026.425.925.326.828.110025.323.422.322.226.412524.821.718.220.128.116027.229.217.617.128.820027.520.516.217.330.525027.921.716.317.53231529.12215.817.633.140030.722.714.916.434.250031.722.914.215.2366303224.211.211.636.58003424.99.71038.5100035.525.99.69.639.9125037.127.29.29.541.4160038.9309.69.843.5200039.429.39.910.244.4250039.627.110.210.544.7315037.622.610.91143.2400034.721.111.311.142.7500030.917.611.511.338.9630031.115.911.611.438.280002813.811.611.5371000024.412.711.711.533.3125002012.211.611.629.61600016.712.111.111.125.4SPL4837.323.523.853.5N5.82.40.50.58.6median 30.9median 22.6median 11.6median 11.5median 36.5Delta4.74.42.83.15.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseRazer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Gigabyte G7 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Noise
-12%
-17%
-26%
0%
5%
off / environment *
23.5
26
-11%
24.6
-5%
27
-15%
23
2%
23.9
-2%
Idle Minimum *
23.8
26
-9%
29.2
-23%
27
-13%
23
3%
23.9
-0%
Idle Average *
23.8
27
-13%
29.2
-23%
35
-47%
28.11
-18%
23.9
-0%
Idle Maximum *
26.8
32
-19%
29.2
-9%
38
-42%
28.11
-5%
23.9
11%
Load Average *
37.3
50
-34%
50.7
-36%
52
-39%
30.62
18%
34.3
8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
51
-6%
53.3
-11%
56
-17%
49.75
-4%
Load Maximum *
53.5
51
5%
61
-14%
59
-10%
50.17
6%
45.9
14%

* ... smaller is better

温度

表面温度对于游戏笔记本电脑来说相对较低,这可能是由于18英寸的大尺寸,带有三个风扇的蒸汽室冷却器,以及140瓦的TGP GPU。更快的RTX 4080或4090配置可能会比我们在这里记录的更热,因为它们都有一个更高的175 W上限。

运行时的热点 Witcher 3顶端只有36摄氏度,底部为33摄氏度,而Alienware m17 R5的温度为50摄氏度至57摄氏度。 而Alienware m17 R5.配备RTX 4070的Blade 18是我们迄今为止测试过的最酷的游戏笔记本电脑之一,很明显,该机箱是为处理比我们的RTX 4070配置更强大的选项而建造的。

空转时的表面温度比预期的略高,因为风扇在低负荷时往往会空转。只要后缘通风良好,Blade 18就不会让皮肤感到不舒服。

后排气管
后排气管
游戏超过一小时后,AC适配器达到43℃。
游戏超过一小时后,AC适配器达到43℃。
Max. Load
 31 °C39.2 °C34.4 °C 
 31.6 °C34.4 °C29.4 °C 
 25.4 °C25 °C24.6 °C 
Maximum: 39.2 °C
Average: 30.6 °C
35.6 °C35 °C31 °C
34.6 °C35.2 °C29.6 °C
29.8 °C29 °C26.4 °C
Maximum: 35.6 °C
Average: 31.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  52 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2.9 °C / 5.2 F).
系统空闲(顶部)
系统空闲(顶部)
系统闲置(底部)
系统闲置(底部)
Witcher 3 压力(顶部)
Witcher 3 压力(顶部)
Witcher 3 压力(底部)
Witcher 3 压力(底部)
Prime95+FurMark的压力(顶)。
Prime95+FurMark的压力(顶)。
Prime95+FurMark的压力(底部)。
Prime95+FurMark的压力(底部)。
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte G7 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat
-28%
2%
-17%
-18%
-18%
Maximum Upper Side *
39.2
50
-28%
40.6
-4%
52
-33%
53
-35%
48.8
-24%
Maximum Bottom *
35.6
56
-57%
41.1
-15%
54
-52%
56
-57%
52.4
-47%
Idle Upper Side *
31.8
36
-13%
26.2
18%
28
12%
30
6%
30.4
4%
Idle Bottom *
33.2
38
-14%
30.3
9%
32
4%
29
13%
34.1
-3%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

当运行Prime95对CPU施加压力时,时钟频率和电路板功耗将分别飙升至3.8 GHz和140 W,然后在大约70秒后降至3.1 GHz和110至120 W范围。核心温度将稳定在87摄氏度,而配备相同CPU的Blade 16则为82摄氏度。

运行时,GPU时钟频率、温度和主板功耗将分别稳定在2265 MHz、64 C和80至90 W。 Witcher 3.GPU本身的额定功率为140 W TGP,因此,即使设置为性能模式,~80 W的范围也比预期的低得多。我们只有在运行《赛博朋克2077》这样要求更高的游戏时,才能使GPU达到100W的峰值。相比之下,RTX 4080 GPU在 刀锋16在运行相同的测试时,将稳定在~160 W,而其目标是175 W TGP。 Witcher 3测试。

用电池供电运行限制了性能。在电池上进行的3DMark 11测试将返回物理和图形分数,分别为10336和18043分,而在主电源上则为25874和39733分。

系统空闲
系统空闲
Witcher 3 压力
Witcher 3 压力
Prime95压力
Prime95压力
Prime95+FurMark压力
Prime95+FurMark压力
CPU时钟(GHz) GPU时钟(MHz) CPU平均温度(°C) GPU平均温度(°C)
系统空闲 -- -- 62 47
Prime95压力 3.2 -- 84 53
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 2.0 - 3.7 2265 70 - 91 63
Witcher 3 应力 ~1.2 2265 85 64

发言人

刀片18的扬声器实际上比刀片17少(6个对8个)。扬声器分别在前角附近和沿键盘边缘向下发射和向上发射。
刀片18的扬声器实际上比刀片17少(6个对8个)。扬声器分别在前角附近和沿键盘边缘向下发射和向上发射。
在最大音量下有粉红噪音。扬声器的功率相对较大,低音再现和平衡性都很好
在最大音量下有粉红噪音。扬声器的功率相对较大,低音再现和平衡性都很好
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203538352528.329.628.33126.826.926.8402526.5255024.725.124.7633324.7338041.826.841.810051.322.251.312558.520.158.516065.917.165.920068.517.368.525073.517.573.531574.517.674.540074.916.474.950072.915.272.96307411.67480073.71073.7100070.79.670.7125072.69.572.6160079.49.879.4200075.610.275.6250076.810.576.8315072.31172.340006811.168500066.411.366.4630065.811.465.880006511.5651000062.311.562.3125006711.6671600064.111.164.1SPL85.723.885.7N67.30.567.3median 70.7median 11.5median 70.7Delta4.13.14.126.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRazer Blade 18 RTX 4070Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源管理--大显示器,大电力需求

消耗功率

在桌面上闲置时的耗电量在24瓦和48瓦之间,取决于亮度设置和电源配置文件。事实上,最低和最高亮度设置之间的差异高达10瓦。这个范围明显高于大多数其他小型笔记本电脑,这可以解释下一节中的电池寿命结果不尽如人意。

当运行 Witcher 3代表典型的游戏负载时,系统将需要平均202瓦,而搭载RTX 3080 Ti的Blade 17或华硕ROG Strix Scar 17则需要229瓦或225瓦。华硕ROG Strix Scar 17 SE分别为229W和225W。因此,我们的18英寸RTX 4070驱动的系统在提供与上一代移动RTX 3080 Ti几乎相同的图形性能的同时,耗电量减少了约10%。升级到RTX 4080或RTX 4090配置可能会多消耗约40 W至50 W的功率,与我们在Blade 16上观察到的情况类似。

当同时运行Prime95和FurMark时,我们能够从中小型(约16.3 x 7 x 2.5厘米)280 W GaN交流适配器中记录到261 W的临时最大功耗。请记住,根据配置的不同,有两种不同的交流适配器:较小的280 W适配器用于RTX 4060和4070 SKUs,较大的330 W适配器用于RTX 4080和4090 SKUs。

3DMark 06的耗电量
3DMark 06的耗电量
Witcher 3 1080p超强消费
Witcher 3 1080p超强消费
在启动Prime95时,消耗量将激增至216瓦,持续约70秒。
在启动Prime95时,消耗量将激增至216瓦,持续约70秒。
Prime95+FurMark的压力在10秒处启动
Prime95+FurMark的压力在10秒处启动
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.27 / 0.98 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 24.5 / 34.1 / 47.7 Watt
Load midlight 140 / 261 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 2560x1600, 18"
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Gigabyte G7 KE
i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 3840x2160, 17"
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
Power Consumption
17%
8%
32%
31%
9%
Idle Minimum *
24.5
17
31%
14
43%
15
39%
13
47%
19.3
21%
Idle Average *
34.1
23
33%
21.6
37%
17
50%
16.5
52%
26.5
22%
Idle Maximum *
47.7
34
29%
24.8
48%
24
50%
17
64%
27.1
43%
Load Average *
140
120
14%
122.5
12%
111
21%
93
34%
141
-1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
202
229
-13%
265
-31%
174.1
14%
239
-18%
225
-11%
Load Maximum *
261
243
7%
418
-60%
208
20%
251
4%
307.9
-18%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270Tooltip
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø202 (195.8-215)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø242 (238-248)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø214 (164.2-261)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø203 (150.8-274)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø27.1 (25.5-29.7)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø15.5 (11.1-24.6)

Power Consumption external Monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240Tooltip
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø205 (199-216)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø182.4 (173.7-211)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø204 (201-210)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø191.7 (184.9-193.8)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø198.8 (181.6-228)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø242 (232-253)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø194.2 (190.3-223)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø236 (225-245)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø25.1 (22.7-44.2)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø14.2 (11.6-16.9)

电池寿命

280 W GaN AC适配器
280 W GaN AC适配器

最大的刀锋型号也带有家族中最大的电池容量91.7Wh,这并非巧合。然而,电池寿命并不一定更长,在许多情况下甚至可能更短。我们能够在平衡电源配置文件上浏览网页4个小时,然后才需要充电,这几乎比去年的Blade 15短了整整一个小时。将显示器刷新率降至60赫兹,而不是240赫兹,可以略微延长电池寿命。

从空电到满电大约需要90分钟。用户还可以通过USB-C为系统充电,尽管速度较慢。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
7h 00min
WiFi Websurfing
4h 00min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 20min
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 91.7 Wh
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 82 Wh
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
Gigabyte G7 KE
i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 54 Wh
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT, 97 Wh
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Battery Runtime
9%
21%
9%
28%
4%
Reader / Idle
420
428
2%
425
1%
WiFi v1.3
240
229
-5%
319
33%
317
32%
290
21%
250
4%
Load
80
103
29%
86
8%
76
-5%
107
34%
H.264
290
358
132
294

Pros

+ 在重量和尺寸上与Blade 17非常接近
+ 对于游戏笔记本电脑来说,表面温度很低
+ 宽敞的18英寸屏幕尺寸
+ 相对较小的交流适配器
+ 良好的端口选择

Cons

- 闲置时的高耗电量
- 没有MUX或Advanced Optimus
- 没有液态金属散热膏
- 电池寿命一般
- 没有网络摄像头快门

结论--喜欢的是硬件,讨厌的是虫子

在审查中。Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070。测试装置由Razer提供
在审查中。Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070。测试装置由Razer提供

我们走的时候 对Blade 16印象深刻印象深刻,但对于Blade 18来说,情况就不一样了。我们的设备会表现出一些主要问题,包括在外部显示器上的DLSS 3性能有问题,在据称包括G-Sync的情况下缺少G-Sync支持,以及可能出现的闪烁显示问题。我们考虑在这些问题得到解决之前暂不做评论,但是Blade 18已经在向客户发货,因此我们认为告知可能在市场上购买该产品的读者是正确的。一旦我们从制造商那里得到适当的解决方案,本页面将更新为最终得分。

当超越上述问题时,Blade 18显示出成为Blade家族另一个优秀产品的潜力。18英寸的显示屏很华丽,相对于占地面积和重量来说很庞大。事实上,该系统并没有比Blade 17 ,这应该使它对那些可能已经在考虑使用Blade 17或其他17英寸游戏笔记本的用户非常有吸引力。其相对较小的GaN交流适配器进一步增加了Blade 18的便携-DTR混合性质。

刀锋18一开始可能听起来很庞大,但它实际上并不比现有的刀锋17大多少。它的大屏幕和高屏占比让人印象深刻。

至于移动RTX 4070,其性能可能不尽人意,取决于游戏。支持DLSS 3的标题在移动RTX 4070上运行得像黄油一样。否则,预计性能将与去年的移动RTX 3080或桌面RTX 3070相似。幸运的是,支持DLSS 3的游戏清单一直在稳步扩大。

对于被一些值得注意的发布问题所破坏的18英寸刀锋系列来说,这是一个总体上强有力的开始。如果一些关键问题没有得到解决,即将推出的华硕ROG Strix Scar 18和戴尔Alienware m18可能给Blade 18带来麻烦。

价格和可用性

刀片18现在正在主要渠道发货,包括亚马逊Newegg百思买。直接从Razer购买 提供了最多的可配置选项。我们的配置可以以3200美元的价格找到。

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Razer Blade 18笔记本电脑回顾。比许多17英寸游戏笔记本更小
Allen Ngo, 2023-02-22 (Update: 2023-02-22)