Acer Aspire Switch 12S SW7-272-M3A0 变形本简短评测
Acer Aspire Switch 12S SW7-272-M3A0 (Aspire Switch Series)
Processor
Intel Core m3-6Y30 2 x 0.9 - 2.2 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 515, Core: 850 MHz, 双通道, 20.19.15.4331
Memory
4 GB
, DDR3-1600, 双通道，板载
Display
12.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 176 PPI, 电容式, native pen support, AU Optronics B125HAN01.0, IPS, glossy: yes, detachable screen
Mainboard
Intel Skylake-Y Premium PCH
Storage
Lite-On CV1-8B128, 128 GB
, 90 GB free
Weight
1.4 kg, Power Supply: 246 g
Price
1199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics B125HAN01.0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 388 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 377.9 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 383 cd/m²
Contrast: 1126:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
64% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
44.63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
43.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.25
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| Acer Aspire Switch 12S SW7-272-M3A0 IPS, 1920x1080 | Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 IPS, 2160x1440 | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 IPS, 1920x1280 | Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N sAMOLED, 2160x1440 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 IPS, 2736x1824 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB IPS, 2736x1824 | Acer Aspire Switch 12 SW5-271-61X7 IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM IPS, 2160x1440 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 56% | 20% | 54% | 50% | 51% | |||
| Display P3 Coverage | 43.2 | 68.1 58% | 53.8 25% | 67.5 56% | 65 50% | 65.5 52% | ||
| sRGB Coverage | 64 | 97.4 52% | 73.7 15% | 96.6 51% | 96.5 51% | 96.1 50% | ||
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 44.63 | 70.2 57% | 53.8 21% | 69 55% | 67 50% | 66.9 50% | ||
| Response Times | -5% | -30% | -78% | -79% | -35% | |||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 25 ? | 30 ? -20% | 33.2 ? -33% | 46 ? -84% | 46 ? -84% | 20 ? 20% | ||
| Response Time Black / White * | 18 ? | 16 ? 11% | 22.8 ? -27% | 31 ? -72% | 31.2 ? -73% | 34 ? -89% | ||
| PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 50 ? | 50 ? | 1000 ? | ||||
| Screen | -18% | -22% | 120% | 17% | 11% | -15% | -19% | |
| Brightness middle | 383 | 341 -11% | 322 -16% | 363 -5% | 389.2 2% | 413 8% | 385 1% | 345 -10% |
| Brightness | 378 | 318 -16% | 319 -16% | 378 0% | 392 4% | 396 5% | 352 -7% | 328 -13% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 87 -5% | 97 5% | 90 -2% | 92 0% | 87 -5% | 85 -8% | 91 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.36 -6% | 0.42 -24% | 0.03 91% | 0.27 21% | 0.36 -6% | 0.48 -41% | 0.38 -12% |
| Contrast | 1126 | 947 -16% | 767 -32% | 12100 975% | 1441 28% | 1147 2% | 802 -29% | 908 -19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.8 | 6 -25% | 6.02 -25% | 4.8 -0% | 3.61 25% | 3.09 36% | 4.3 10% | 8.4 -75% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.77 | 10.06 -15% | 6.91 21% | 11.9 -36% | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 8.12 -190% | 6.29 -125% | 5.04 -80% | 3.8 -36% | 3.92 -40% | 3.73 -33% | 4.3 -54% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.23 99% | 2.4 92% | 2.57 86% | 2.16 102% | 2.3 96% | 2.66 83% | 2.63 84% |
| CCT | 6676 97% | 7011 93% | 7712 84% | 7255 90% | 5969 109% | 7333 89% | 6785 96% | 7368 88% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 41 | 63.4 55% | 47.8 17% | 73 78% | 63 54% | 61 49% | 62 51% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 64 | 97.4 52% | 73.2 14% | 97 52% | 97 52% | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 11% /
-0% | -11% /
-14% | 120% /
120% | -2% /
11% | -6% /
7% | -15% /
-15% | -1% /
-6% |
* ... smaller is better
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | Geekbench 3 | Sunspider | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | Peacekeeper
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Acer Aspire Switch 12S SW7-272-M3A0 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Acer Aspire Switch 12S SW7-272-M3A0 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 7 Score | 4173 points | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2536 points | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 2819 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3596 points | |
Help | ||
| PCMark 7 - Score | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Acer Aspire Switch 12S SW7-272-M3A0 | |
| Acer Aspire Switch 12 SW5-271-61X7 | |
Lite-On CV1-8B128
Sequential Read:
445.2 MB/s
Sequential Write:
179.9 MB/s
512K Read:
330.6 MB/s
512K Write:
181.6 MB/s
4K Read:
12.17 MB/s
4K Write:
19.09 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
137.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
106.5 MB/s
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 4968 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 814 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 32704 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 3278 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 453 points | |
Help | ||
| 3DMark 06 - 1280x1024 Standard Score AA:0x AF:0x | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Acer Aspire Switch 12S SW7-272-M3A0 | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 32.3 | 16.9 | 12.1 | 5.8 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 26 | 13.7 | 11.8 | 3.8 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 17.7 | 12.4 | 8.5 | 2.3 |
| Need for Speed 2016 (2016) | 8.4 | 5.9 |
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38.9 °C / 102 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-10.9 °C / -19.6 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38.9 °C / 102 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-10.9 °C / -19.6 F).
| Acer Aspire Switch 12S SW7-272-M3A0 6Y30, HD Graphics 515 | Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 6Y54, HD Graphics 515 | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 6Y54, HD Graphics 515 | Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N 6Y30, HD Graphics 515 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 6Y30, HD Graphics 515 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 6300U, HD Graphics 520 | Acer Aspire Switch 12 SW5-271-61X7 5Y10c, HD Graphics 5300 | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -14% | -15% | -35% | -24% | -51% | -16% | -28% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 40.2 | 38.6 4% | 39 3% | 42.5 -6% | 43.6 -8% | 52.3 -30% | 43.6 -8% | 46.7 -16% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 27.4 | 40.8 -49% | 41.2 -50% | 44.6 -63% | 45.2 -65% | 51.4 -88% | 43.4 -58% | 51 -86% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28.6 | 30.4 -6% | 29.5 -3% | 36.6 -28% | 32.4 -13% | 43.2 -51% | 27.5 4% | 29.5 -3% |
| Idle Bottom * | 27.1 | 28 -3% | 29.8 -10% | 38.6 -42% | 29.6 -9% | 36 -33% | 27.6 -2% | 28.6 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0.36 / 1.2 Watt |
| Idle |  6.3 / 9.4 / 12.3 Watt |
| Load |
18.6 / 19 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Aspire Switch 12S SW7-272-M3A0 6Y30, HD Graphics 515 | Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 6Y54, HD Graphics 515 | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 6Y54, HD Graphics 515 | Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N 6Y30, HD Graphics 515 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 6300U, HD Graphics 520 | Acer Aspire Switch 12 SW5-271-61X7 5Y10c, HD Graphics 5300 | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -4% | 1% | 28% | 7% | 20% | -19% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 6.3 | 4 37% | 3.7 41% | 3.4 46% | 4.4 30% | 4.1 35% | 7.3 -16% |
| Idle Average * | 9.4 | 8.6 9% | 6.8 28% | 8 15% | 9 4% | 8 15% | 10 -6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 12.3 | 9.3 24% | 7.6 38% | 9 27% | 10.7 13% | 9.3 24% | 10.15 17% |
| Load Average * | 18.6 | 18.6 -0% | 22.5 -21% | 12 35% | 19.6 -5% | 16.3 12% | 25.2 -35% |
| Load Maximum * | 19 | 36.3 -91% | 34.5 -82% | 16.1 15% | 19.9 -5% | 16.8 12% | 29.3 -54% |
* ... smaller is better
| Acer Aspire Switch 12S SW7-272-M3A0 34 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 41 Wh | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 37 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N 39.5 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 38 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 38 Wh | Acer Aspire Switch 12 SW5-271-61X7 37 Wh | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM 37 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 33% | 21% | 72% | 29% | 24% | 29% | 8% | |
| Reader / Idle | 530 | 861 62% | 732 38% | 1110 109% | 791 49% | 899 70% | 771 45% | 640 21% |
| H.264 | 337 | 450 34% | 432 28% | 515 53% | 378 12% | 468 39% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 343 | 440 28% | 443 29% | 525 53% | 488 42% | 427 24% | 321 -6% | |
| Load | 145 | 157 8% | 130 -10% | 138 -5% | 111 -23% | 112 -23% | ||
| WiFi | 360 |
Pros
+ 明亮、高对比度的屏幕
+ 无噪音
+ 高速固态硬盘
+ 键盘底座
Cons
- 仅12个月质保
- 处理器和显卡降频
- 一般的电池续航时间
Acer的Switch 12S是一台12.5寸可分离设备。它搭配了Skylake架构酷睿m处理器，为文字处理和上网浏览提供了足够的性能。这台变形本采用无噪音设计，在使用中发热量也不大，同时得利于固态硬盘响应速度很快。我们很喜欢它的屏幕，它明亮而具备高对比度以及宽广的可视角度范围。相比同类产品，Acer决定采用16:9比例而非其他设备的3:2比例设计。它的触控屏幕响应迅速，同时支持可选的手写笔。
这台可分离式测试机售价1200欧元（约8873人民币）——我们认为有些过于昂贵。在这个价位上它的整体表现弱点较多。
首先，它的电池续航只能算一般，大部分竞争对手都提供了更长的续航时间。Acer也没有在键盘底座中搭配第二块电池。它并不附带手写笔——相比之下售价较低的联想 Ideapad Miix 700附赠了键盘底座和手写笔。最后Switch仅有一年质保。考虑到Acer德国的低端笔记本电脑也有24个月质保，这让人十分难以理解。感兴趣的用户可以对比考虑微软 Surface Pro 4，联想 Ideapad Miix 700或Acer Aspire Switch 12 Alpha。它们售价都较低，性价比更高。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Acer Aspire Switch 12S SW7-272-M3A0
- 06/23/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Convertible - Weighted Average
Price comparison
