Aokzoe A1 游戏掌上电脑评测:雄心勃勃,但仍有改进空间
现在,ULV CPU 和 GPU 功能强大,足以在 1080p 分辨率下运行现代游戏,因此类似任天堂 Switch 的手持式 Windows PC 迅速流行起来。中国制造商 Aokzoe 最新推出的 A1 采用 Zen 3+ Ryzen 7 6800U CPU 和集成 Radeon 680M 显卡,零售价约为 900 美元至 1300 美元。A1 和 A1 Pro 在机身设计、显示屏和控制方面完全相同。
Aokzoe A1 的替代产品包括其他 Windows PC 手持设备,如 GPD Win 4以及 Steam Deck、 OneXPlayer 2或 华硕 ROG Ally.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80.1 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Aokzoe A1 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M | 735 g | 21 mm | 8.00" | 1920x1200 | |
84 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | One Netbook XPlayer 2 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M | 864 g | 23 mm | 8.40" | 2560x1600 | |
87.5 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M | 611 g | 21.22 mm | 7.00" | 1920x1080 | |
80.3 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M | 607 g | 28 mm | 6.00" | 1920x1080 | |
v (old) | GPD Win 3 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 553 g | 27 mm | 5.50" | 1280x720 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
底盘主要采用塑料材质,与主要采用金属材质的 GPD Win 4.机身质量依然出色,没有出现重大的吱吱作响或扭曲问题,给人留下了良好的第一印象。不过,按键的手感可能会好坏参半,我们将在下文的输入部分详细介绍。
由于采用了更大的 8 英寸屏幕,A1 比包括 ROG Ally 在内的许多替代产品都更大更重。如果算上凸起的手柄,A1 的最厚处约为 41 毫米,而从屏幕正面到背面的厚度仅为 21 毫米。由于其重量,A1 更适合在火车或汽车上坐着玩,而不是站着或走着玩。
连接性
两个 USB-C 端口分别位于设备的顶部和底部边缘,非常方便。每个端口都可用于为设备充电或输出到外部显示器,只有顶部的端口与 USB4 兼容,可用于 eGPU。
SD 读卡器
虽然我们的 UHS-II 测试卡的读取速度很快,接近 200 MB/s,但传输速度明显较慢。将 1 GB 的图片从我们的卡传输到桌面需要近 20 秒,而 ROG Ally 仅需 6 到 7 秒。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
GPD Win 3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 32 GB UHS-II) | |
GPD Win 4 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Aokzoe A1 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Aokzoe A1 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
GPD Win 4 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
GPD Win 3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 32 GB UHS-II) |
交流
联发科 RZ608 是 Wi-Fi 6E 连接的标准配置。与 Wi-Fi 6 相比,Wi-Fi 6E 的延迟更快,有助于减少通过云端串流游戏时的延迟。不过,在大多数情况下,传输速率并不一定比 Wi-Fi 6 快多少。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 |
维护
对于掌上电脑来说,可维护性一般都很好。虽然内存模块是焊接的,但电池、无线局域网、M.2 2280 固态硬盘和散热风扇等其他组件在需要时也可以更换。不过,固态硬盘被埋在铝制散热器、WLAN 模块和系统风扇下面,因此检修起来既费时又费力。
配件和保修
包装盒内除了交流适配器和文件外,没有其他附件。制造商通常提供一年有限保修。
输入设备
控制器上只要有一个不舒服的按键就会给人留下不好的印象,不幸的是,A1 的按键恰好是肩部按键。更具体地说,LB 和 RB 按钮很难按下,因为它们在输入之前需要很大的力度。按键的位置也很重要,因为反馈并不一致。例如,按压靠近顶部边缘的按钮比按压靠近底部边缘的按钮更难,因此手感很不均匀。相比之下,Switch 或 Playstation 上的肩部按钮无论按哪个角落都更容易按下。
显示屏 - 大而清晰的 IPS
1200p 京东方 IPS 触摸屏具有清晰的图像、良好的色彩、适当的响应时间和对比度,适合游戏用途。它的主要缺点是亮度水平一般,刷新率为 60 Hz,而且存在 PWM,这分别会影响室外能见度和导致敏感用户眼睛疲劳。此外,它还不支持 FreeSync。
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 328.4 cd/m²
Contrast: 842:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.17 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.07
ΔE Greyscale 12.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
73.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.7
Aokzoe A1 BOE0207, IPS, 1920x1200, 8" | One Netbook XPlayer 2 FLQ8423, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4" | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme TL070FVSX01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7" | GPD Win 4 G1618-04, IPS, 1920x1080, 6" | GPD Win 3 IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 2% | -6% | -9% | -12% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 72.3 | 75.4 4% | 65.6 -9% | 63.1 -13% | 59.5 -18% |
sRGB Coverage | 92.6 | 97 5% | 92.1 -1% | 92 -1% | 89.6 -3% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 73.4 | 71.1 -3% | 67.9 -7% | 64.6 -12% | 61.4 -16% |
Response Times | -18% | 68% | 4% | -30% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 28.9 ? | 36.8 ? -27% | 10.5 ? 64% | 26.8 ? 7% | 40 ? -38% |
Response Time Black / White * | 21.1 ? | 22.8 ? -8% | 6 ? 72% | 20.9 ? 1% | 25.6 ? -21% |
PWM Frequency | 9970.7 | ||||
Screen | 8% | 42% | 14% | 6% | |
Brightness middle | 328.4 | 369 12% | 513 56% | 413.1 26% | 468.8 43% |
Brightness | 323 | 363 12% | 474 47% | 407 26% | 460 42% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 89 -3% | 84 -9% | 81 -12% | 93 1% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.28 28% | 0.38 3% | 0.39 -0% | 0.45 -15% |
Contrast | 842 | 1318 57% | 1350 60% | 1059 26% | 1042 24% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 10.17 | 7.1 30% | 3.7 64% | 6.97 31% | 9 12% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.14 | 10.9 40% | 8.3 54% | 14.11 22% | 15.5 15% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.07 | 2.6 -143% | 1.24 -16% | 1.91 -79% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 12.7 | 8.3 35% | 5.1 60% | 9.9 22% | 10.9 14% |
Gamma | 2.7 81% | 2.01 109% | 2.14 103% | 2.04 108% | 2.13 103% |
CCT | 12502 52% | 8838 74% | 7732 84% | 9571 68% | 10972 59% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56.6 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89.2 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -3% /
3% | 35% /
35% | 3% /
8% | -12% /
-3% |
* ... smaller is better
由于色温过低,显示器开箱后的校准效果很差。我们建议使用上述经过校准的 ICM 配置文件来提高显示效果,特别是因为它覆盖了 90% 以上的 sRGB 标准。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
21.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.1 ms rise | |
↘ 10 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
28.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.8 ms rise | |
↘ 15.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 9970.7 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 9970.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 9970.7 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
脉宽调制(PWM)适用于所有亮度级别,最高可达 99%。遗憾的是,这使得 A1 IPS 面板成为极少数具有 PWM 功能的面板之一,因为大多数其他 IPS 显示器无论亮度设置如何,都不会出现任何闪烁。
即使在阴凉处,室外能见度也很一般。光亮的屏幕容易产生眩光,有限的背光亮度让色彩显得黯淡无光。在户外游戏时,文本和 HUD 项目尤其难以阅读,因为它们比桌面显示器小得多,也暗得多。ROG AllyROG Ally的屏幕要亮得多。
请确保关闭 AMD Vari-Bright 功能,否则在使用电池供电时,最大亮度会下降。
性能 - 与现代超极本一样快
测试条件
系统默认设置为平衡模式,CPU 功耗仅为 15 W。在运行下面的基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式,CPU 功耗设置为 28 W。后者可通过按下屏幕右下角的黄色 Turbo 底部进入。建议用户熟悉预装的 Turbo 菜单和 OneXConsole 应用程序,以便自定义前置 LED 指示灯或按钮映射等辅助功能。
处理器
CPU 性能卓越,可媲美采用相同配置的笔记本电脑 Ryzen 7 6800UCPU 的笔记本电脑不相上下。不过 Ryzen Z1 Extreme快 30%,而 ROG Ally 中的Ryzen 7 7840HS则比我们的 Aokzoe 快 40%。
值得注意的是,处理器性能比OneXPlayer 2快 25%,尽管两款机型使用的是相同的 Ryzen 7 6800U 处理器。这表明,OneXPlayer 的 CPU 比我们的 A1 机型节流更多。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr -2! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 -1! | |
GPD Win Max 2021 -2! | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
GPD Win 3 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (878 - 1534, n=7) | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
GPD Win 3 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (3529 - 4574, n=8) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
GPD Win 3 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (341 - 602, n=8) | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
GPD Win 3 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (1463 - 1979, n=7) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
GPD Win 3 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (142.6 - 246, n=6) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
GPD Win 3 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (6854 - 8935, n=9) | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
GPD Win 3 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (926 - 1555, n=9) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
GPD Win 3 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (11.8 - 14.2, n=6) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
GPD Win 3 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (50.1 - 84.9, n=6) | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Beelink SER7 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (0.508 - 0.529, n=5) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Beelink SER7 |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (10902 - 12818, n=6) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (67503 - 84031, n=6) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (2296 - 2818, n=6) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (62082 - 96306, n=6) | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (7753 - 11982, n=6) | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (37417 - 45748, n=6) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (50547 - 115681, n=6) | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (554 - 755, n=6) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (5825 - 6694, n=6) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (24728 - 27274, n=6) | |
Aokzoe A1 |
系统性能
PCMark 分数非常高,可与许多较新的高端笔记本电脑媲美,例如联想 Yoga 7 14。由于处理器速度更快,ROG Ally Z1 Extreme 的得分甚至更高。
我们在测试机上遇到了几个错误,其中最突出的是睡眠唤醒问题。按下电源按钮可以关闭屏幕进入睡眠模式,但有时屏幕会无法重新打开,即使风扇会继续运转。这时需要强制重启才能返回 Windows。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (5057 - 6639, n=7) | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
GPD Win 3 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (8143 - 10766, n=6) | |
GPD Win 3 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (6089 - 9328, n=6) | |
GPD Win 3 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (6066 - 8144, n=6) | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
GPD Win 3 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (1009 - 1575, n=7) | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (971 - 1596, n=7) | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (1054 - 1686, n=7) | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (994 - 1473, n=7) | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
PCMark 10 Score | 6639 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (47010 - 52159, n=6) | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Aokzoe A1 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (39197 - 45084, n=6) | |
Aokzoe A1 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (48723 - 51117, n=6) | |
Aokzoe A1 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (106.3 - 123.1, n=6) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在打开主页的多个标签页时,LatencyMon 没有显示重大的 DPC 问题。60 FPS 的 4K 视频播放效果不错,但并不完美,在一分钟的测试视频中出现了 4 次丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win 3 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
A1 支持全尺寸 M.2 2280 SSD,而其他一些手持 PC(如 Steam Deck)只支持较短的 2230 外形。该 Biwin Aokzoe A1S PCIe3 x4 硬盘在我们的测试设备中长时间保持 3400 MB/s 的最大传输速率没有任何问题。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme |
DiskSpd | |
seq read | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
seq write | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
seq q8 t1 read | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
seq q8 t1 write | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
4k q1 t1 read | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
4k q1 t1 write | |
GPD Win 3 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
4k q32 t16 read | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
4k q32 t16 write | |
GPD Win 3 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme |
AS SSD | |
Score Total | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Score Read | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Score Write | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win 3 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Seq Read | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Seq Write | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
4K Read | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
4K Write | |
GPD Win 3 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
4K-64 Read | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
4K-64 Write | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win 3 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Access Time Read | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Access Time Write | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
GPD Win 3 |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
迚ケ谿オ譎る俣 Radeon 680M尽管有了更新的 Radeon 780M.3DMark 结果符合我们的预期,与采用相同 GPU 的笔记本电脑相比,即使速度稍快,也不会出现重大节流问题。
在电池供电的情况下可获得全部性能。不过,请注意,如果将电源配置文件设置为平衡模式而不是性能模式,图形性能会降低 30%,如下表 3DMark 11 结果所示,即使连接到主电源也是如此。
升级到配备 Radeon 780M 的 Aokzoe A1 Pro 后,图形性能有望提升约 10%至 20%。
电源配置文件 | 物理得分 | 图形得分 | 综合得分 |
性能参数 | 14280 | 10741 | 6407 |
电池电量 | 14732 (-0%) | 10884 (-0%) | 6486 (-0%) |
平衡型材 | 11954 (-16%) | 7652 (-30%) | 5591 (-13%) |
3DMark 11 Performance | 10423 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6814 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2741 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
现代游戏可以在原生 1200p 分辨率下运行,其中一些甚至可以达到平均 60 FPS,包括《F1 22》。尽管如此,我们还是建议将设置调低,尤其是像《赛博朋克 2077》这样要求较高的游戏,以减少帧数下降。内部显示屏不支持 FreeSync,这一点非常遗憾,因为它本来可以与 Radeon 680M 搭配得很好。
The Witcher 3 | |
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Average AMD Radeon 680M (67.4 - 150, n=30) | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Radeon 680M (22.3 - 48, n=32) | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Average AMD Radeon 680M (14.3 - 27.1, n=32) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset (DX12) | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Average AMD Radeon 680M (59.3 - 126.2, n=16) | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12) | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Radeon 680M (37.7 - 65.8, n=17) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Radeon 680M (28.2 - 47.1, n=17) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Radeon 680M (19.8 - 31.2, n=17) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Radeon 680M (16 - 24.4, n=17) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Average AMD Radeon 680M (46.1 - 77.6, n=14) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Average AMD Radeon 680M (26 - 50.6, n=15) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Average AMD Radeon 680M (20.1 - 41.8, n=15) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Radeon 680M (16.3 - 33.6, n=15) | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average AMD Radeon 680M (14 - 23.8, n=15) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 136.6 | 50.5 | 23.5 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 108.2 | 40.1 | 24.5 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 108.3 | 96.3 | 73 | 69.7 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 63.6 | 33.5 | 24.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 57.2 | 46.1 | 36 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 62 | 38 | 35 | 34 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 146.2 | 61.7 | 50.6 | 43.4 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 34 | 25.8 | 19 | 16.7 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 57.3 | 44 | 28.3 | 22.3 |
F1 22 (2022) | 78.4 | 69 | 50.5 | 13.2 |
排放量
系统噪音 - 持续脉冲问题
风扇噪音是 A1 的弱项之一。它每隔一分钟左右就会在静音和 37 分贝(A)之间频繁跳动,在较安静的室内环境中非常明显,甚至令人烦恼。在电池模式下,甚至只是在桌面上空转时,都会出现这种现象。将系统设置为平衡模式似乎并不能解决脉冲问题。
游戏时的风扇噪音也相当大,但考虑到 A1 的性能和尺寸,这也不足为奇。不过,平衡模式下的游戏噪音约为 37 dB(A),而性能模式下则为 41 dB(A)或更大。这些范围与 ROG Ally 或 OneXPlayer 2 相当,但总体上比 Win 4.
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.3 / 27.1 / 37.3 dB(A) |
Load |
| 37.4 / 46.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) |
Aokzoe A1 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U | One Netbook XPlayer 2 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM | GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB | GPD Win 3 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, BIWIN NS200 1TB CNF82GS1G02-1TB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -3% | 8% | -13% | -6% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 26.1 -13% | 23.3 -1% | 24 -4% | 27.4 -19% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.3 | 26.1 -12% | 23.3 -0% | 31.2 -34% | 29.1 -25% |
Idle Average * | 27.1 | 31.6 -17% | 23.3 14% | 31.2 -15% | 29.1 -7% |
Idle Maximum * | 37.3 | 31.6 15% | 27.3 27% | 33.5 10% | 29.1 22% |
Load Average * | 37.4 | 35.7 5% | 39.2 -5% | 45.5 -22% | 40.7 -9% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.2 | 43.3 -5% | 39.2 5% | 48.6 -18% | 42.8 -4% |
Load Maximum * | 46.2 | 43.3 6% | 39.2 15% | 49 -6% | 46.3 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
游戏时,正面的表面温度可达 39 摄氏度以上,背面可达 45 摄氏度以上。幸运的是,这些热点都位于屏幕中央或顶部边缘,手持设备时手指不太可能接触到这些地方。控制器和按键部分的温度保持在 20 摄氏度到 30 摄氏度之间。无论我们在 A1 上玩多久,手都不会感到不舒服。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38.8 °C / 101.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.9 °C / -17.8 F).
Aokzoe A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M | One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M | GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M | GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 2% | 8% | 24% | 25% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41.6 | 42.6 -2% | 44.4 -7% | 35 16% | 28.6 31% |
Maximum Bottom * | 41.6 | 39.6 5% | 37.9 9% | 26.8 36% | 33 21% |
Idle Upper Side * | 34.8 | 32.4 7% | 29.9 14% | 28.4 18% | 24.6 29% |
Idle Bottom * | 33.6 | 34.3 -2% | 28.3 16% | 25 26% | 27.6 18% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在启动 Prime95 压力模式时,CPU 时钟频率、主板功耗和核心温度分别稳定在 2.8 GHz、28 W 和 79 C。系统能够长时间保持 28 W 的 TDP 目标,而 Win 4 中的相同处理器在类似条件下,即使设置为性能模式,也会降至 2.2 GHz 和 18 W。
在性能模式下运行时,图形处理器的时钟频率和功耗分别高达 1923 MHz 和 27 W。 Witcher 3功耗分别高达 1923 MHz 和 27 W。如果在平衡模式下,GPU 将降至 984 MHz 和 14 W,这与我们上面观察到的 3DMark 和风扇噪音相关。
CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 46 |
Prime95 压力 | 2.8 | -- | 79 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2.9 | 1106 | 75 |
Witcher 3 压力(平衡模式) | ~1.1 | 929 | 63 |
Witcher 3 压力(性能模式) | ~1.3 | ~1567 | 73 |
发言人
Aokzoe A1 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
功耗略高于OneXPlayer 2可能是因为 Ryzen 7 6800U CPU 性能更高。ROG Ally 的要求更高,以反映其更高的性能目标。
当 CPU 的使用率达到 100% 时,我们可以测量到小型(6.6 x 5.4 x 3.1 厘米)100 W GaN USB-C 适配器的最大功耗为 65 W。游戏的平均耗电量约为 58 W,因此还有很大的余量为任何 USB 设备充电和供电。
Off / Standby | 1.5 / 1.6 Watt |
Idle | 8.8 / 11.3 / 11.5 Watt |
Load |
32.1 / 64.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Aokzoe A1 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, , IPS, 1920x1200, 8" | One Netbook XPlayer 2 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, , IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4" | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 7" | GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB, IPS, 1920x1080, 6" | GPD Win 3 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, BIWIN NS200 1TB CNF82GS1G02-1TB, IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 14% | 9% | -3% | 42% | |
Idle Minimum * | 8.8 | 7.2 18% | 4.2 52% | 7.5 15% | 2.9 67% |
Idle Average * | 11.3 | 9.3 18% | 6.1 46% | 12.4 -10% | 4.5 60% |
Idle Maximum * | 11.5 | 9.7 16% | 6.3 45% | 13 -13% | 4.5 61% |
Load Average * | 32.1 | 33.1 -3% | 56.6 -76% | 46 -43% | 38.5 -20% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 58.3 | 49.6 15% | 64.1 -10% | 45.2 22% | 28.9 50% |
Load Maximum * | 64.5 | 50.7 21% | 67.2 -4% | 56 13% | 41.4 36% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
对于便携式游戏机来说,65 Wh 的电池容量相当大,因为有些笔记本电脑,如联想 IdeaPad 3 14 等笔记本电脑的电池容量较小。不过,电池续航时间一般,在平衡模式下浏览 WLAN 仅有不到 6.5 小时,而 ROG Ally 或 OneXPlayer 2 则分别为 8 小时或 10 多个小时。如上所述,部分原因可能是风扇无缘无故地频繁跳动。RGB 灯光也无法禁用,从而进一步影响电池寿命。
如果玩游戏,预计 A1 最多只能使用 80 分钟或不到 2 小时。其他游戏手持设备也存在续航时间短的问题,如 OneXPlayer 2 或 GPD Win 4.
使用附带的交流适配器从空电充至满电仅需 2 个多小时。
Aokzoe A1 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 65 Wh | One Netbook XPlayer 2 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 65.5 Wh | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 40 Wh | GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 46 Wh | GPD Win 3 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 44 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 65% | 22% | 17% | 39% | |
Reader / Idle | 431 | 581 35% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 381 | 628 65% | 465 22% | 450 18% | 675 77% |
Load | 78 | 77 -1% | 79 1% | ||
Witcher 3 ultra | 96 | 57 | |||
H.264 | 568 |
Pros
Cons
结论:降价后可能物有所值
相对于小巧的外形,Aokzoe A1 在最大限度地提高性能方面表现出色。类似掌上游戏机的设计由于体积小,往往会使处理器超频不足或运行在较慢的 Turbo Boost 时钟频率上,但 A1 中的 Ryzen 7 6800U 即使在压力下也能表现出色。它也没有出现我们在 GPD Win 4.
虽然 A1 的性能令人印象深刻,但它的硬件和功能还需要更多的改进。与任天堂 Switch 或 GPD Win 4 控制器的肩部按键相比,A1 的肩部按键尤其难以按下。 即使在节能模式下,风扇的脉冲频率和声音也过于响亮,而前置 LED 灯始终处于激活状态,无法轻松禁用。睡眠唤醒问题、PWM、色彩校准不佳以及室外可视性有限等问题可能也会让很多潜在买家望而却步。有些缺点是意料之中的,但它们在 A1 上往往更明显,尤其是与同价位的 华硕 ROG Ally.
Aokzoe A1 在性能方面表现出色。遗憾的是,它的许多功能都缺乏我们对零售价为 1000 美元的 PC 所期待的精致和对细节的关注。
如果将来要重新设计,还有很大的改进空间。更好的按键、更亮的显示屏和更好的风扇性能都是我们需要改进的地方。对于那些需要相对较大的 8 英寸触摸屏和稳定的 Ryzen 7 6800U 性能的用户来说,A1 是一个不错的选择,但对于更严肃的游戏玩家来说,极具竞争力的 华硕 ROG Ally的性价比更高。
价格和供应情况
Aokzoe 现在直接向客户发货A1 的 32 GB+2 TB 配置已直接发货,售价为 1000 美元。另外,亚马逊 上相同配置的价格为 1300 美元,而较低的 16 GB+512 GB 配置价格低至 930 美元。
Aokzoe A1
- 09/20/2023 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.