Apple MacBook Air M2入门评测--非常好，但太贵的日常MacBook

Name: Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Brand: Apple

M2的效率不如M1。

经过近两年的时间，MacBook Air M1终于有了一个继任者，它是专门为Apple"自己的芯片 "设计的。配备M2 CPU的新Air的价格也更高，因为配备8GB内存和256GB固态硬盘的入门级设备起价为1299美元。这个价格是否合理？

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 07/25/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Apple ARM Laptop / Notebook MacBook Thunderbolt Ultrabook

旧的MacBook Pro 13配备新的Apple M2芯片，几周前推出，现在我们终于得到完全重新设计的MacBook Air M2。新的空气有很大的作用，因为以前的MacBook Air M1是过去两年中最好的紧凑型笔记本电脑之一。Apple ，希望通过一个完全重新设计的机箱继续这个成功故事，该机箱是为Apple"自己的M2处理器开发的。新的显示屏现在支持更大的P3色域，就像更大的MacBook Pro机型一样，而且面板更亮，你会得到新的扬声器，有一个1080p网络摄像头，流行的MagSafe连接器也回来了。然而，新机型的起价要高得多，基本机型为1199美元，只有8GB内存和256GB SSD存储。

似乎Apple ，也没有真正确定定价，仍然提供配备较慢的7核GPU的MacBook Air M1（目前），最有可能提供1000美元范围的产品。我们想了解新的MacBook Air M2的使用情况，被动冷却方案如何处理新的M2芯片，以及你在日常工作中是否真的注意到较慢的256GB SSD。

我们回顾了新的午夜色的MacBook Air M2的基本型号，我们在Apple's在线商店购买的（没有新闻单位）。如果你得到所有选项（24GB内存，2TB固态硬盘），新Air M2的价格将上升到2499美元。我们的编辑部目前也有一台MacBook Air M2，配备更快的10核GPU、16GB内存和1TB固态硬盘；相应的评论将很快发表。

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry

Processor

Apple M2 8 x 2.4 - 3.5 GHz, 20 W PL2 / Short Burst, 9.5 W PL1 / Sustained

Graphics adapter

Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Core: 1398 MHz, 10 W TDP

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR5-6400, onboard

Display

13.60 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1664 pixel 225 PPI, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

Apple SSD AP0256Z, 256 GB

, 216 GB free

Connections

2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm stereo, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 11.3 x 304.1 x 215

Battery

52.6 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Apple macOS 12 Monterey

Camera

Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Quad speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 30W PSU, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

1.215 kg, Power Supply: 174 g

Price

1499 Euro

Links

Apple homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
92.3 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2022	Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2, M2 8-Core GPU	1.2 kg	11.3 mm	13.60"	2560x1664
91.1 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2020	Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1, M1 7-Core GPU	1.3 kg	16.1 mm	13.30"	2560x1600
91.9 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2022	Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2, M2 10-Core GPU	1.4 kg	15.6 mm	13.30"	2560x1600
86.9 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2022	Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.2 kg	15.3 mm	13.40"	3840x2400
90.1 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2022	Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED R7 6800U, Radeon 680M	1.1 kg	14.9 mm	13.30"	2880x1800
88.8 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2022	Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	1.3 kg	16.5 mm	13.40"	2520x1680
87.8 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2022	Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE R7 5800U, Vega 8	1.3 kg	14.9 mm	13.30"	1920x1200

案例--新的MacBook Air M2更轻薄、更大

Apple 没有使用老款的熟悉设计楔形底座的MacBook Air新的MacBook Air M2的基本设计与其他MacBook机型并不相似。机箱高度在前面和后面是相同的，新的Air非常薄，只有11.3毫米。旧款Air的正面更薄，但背面更厚。如果你以前使用过MacBook Pro，你知道底座的锋利边缘会很快在你的手腕上留下痕迹，这可能会让人感到不舒服。我们认为这在这里也可能是一个问题，但幸运的是，底座单元非常薄，我们没有任何问题。

由于前面的凹陷和调整良好的铰链，用一只手打开盖子非常容易。该设备使用熟悉的键盘，带有标准高度的功能键和当前的Touch-ID指纹扫描仪。与目前的MacBook Pro 14不同的是，各个按键之间的空间不是黑色的，而是仍然采用机箱颜色。带有圆角的盖子设计也与MBP 14.总而言之，我们不得不说Apple ，使用了相对较宽的边框，尤其是在显示屏下方，机身与屏幕的比例 "只有 "84%（我们还没有减去缺口）。

更薄的设计并不影响稳定性和质量印象。底座和盖子都非常结实，几乎没有任何凹陷或扭曲。我们也没有设法引起图片失真。铰链调整得很好，没有明显的弹跳，但最大打开角度被限制在130度左右。

除了熟悉的银色和太空灰，Apple ，还提供MacBook Air M2的两种新颜色选择，即Midnight和Starlight。我们购买的是Midnight版本，这是一种深蓝色，根据光线的不同，几乎看起来是黑色的。这种颜色在照片上和打开盒子时看起来很好，但表面极易受到指纹和灰尘的影响，几乎不可能保持清洁。USB-C接口很快就会出现一些划痕，由于颜色较深，与其他版本相比更明显。新的星光型号（明亮的银色，略带金色的色调）在这方面要好得多，与我们熟悉的银色和太空灰的颜色相似。

新的MacBook Air M2实际上比以前略深，而且占地面积也比以前略大。MacBook Air M1甚至是MacBook Pro 13 M2.然而，得益于薄薄的机身和圆润的边角，新MacBook仍然给人留下非常紧凑的印象。

华硕Zenbook S 13 VS.Apple MacBook Air M2 VS. Dell XPS 13 Plus

一些竞争对手在这方面表现出色，包括新的戴尔XPS 13 Plus以及华硕Zenbook S 13.如果你经常在狭小的空间工作（如火车、飞机），这可能是一个重要的区别。

尽管机箱稍大，Apple ，设法减少新的空气M2的重量为1.215公斤，所以它是约60克轻比前代产品，尽管你几乎不会注意到这一点。一些竞争对手更重，只有Zenbook S 13明显更轻，约为1.1公斤（或非触摸SKU分别为约1公斤）。MacBook Air M2的紧凑型30W电源适配器的重量为174克，包括MagSafe电缆。

尺寸比较

Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K DIN A4 ❌

连接性--MagSafe回来了，但Wi-Fi仍然限制在80兆赫以内

MacBook Air M2在左侧配备了一个MagSafe接口，可以用来为设备充电（通过USB-C充电也仍然可以）。然而，在其他方面，与旧款MacBook Air M1相比，没有什么变化。MacBook Air M1，因为新的M2芯片仍然限于Thunderbolt 3，而且你只能连接一个外部屏幕（最高6K @60 Hz）。两侧各有一个USB-C接口也会更方便。

左侧。MagSafe，2个USB-C 4.0（Thunderbolt 3，40Gbps，Power Delivery，DisplayPort-Alt模式）。

沟通

就像以前的MacBook Air M1新的M2 SoC再次被限制在80MHz的Wi-Fi（802.11ax）。没有对更快的160MHz网络或Wi-Fi 6E的支持，而蓝牙也仅限于旧的5.0标准。考虑到高昂的价格，你没有得到最新的标准，这很令人恼火。

考虑到80兆赫的限制，传输速率仍然很好，我们也可以看到华硕新的参考路由器（AXE1100）的改进，因为结果稳定在850-950Mbps之间，但新的Air M2的速度比MacBook Pro 13 M2和旧的MacBook Air M1。另一方面，一些Windows对手的速度达到了1.5Gbps以上。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1317 (1123^min - 1404^max) MBit/s
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	909 (814^min - 1010^max) MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (405 - 1750, n=103)	787 MBit/s
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple AirPort Extreme M1	552 (257^min - 620^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1258 (1143^min - 1362^max) MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1248 (680^min - 1346^max) MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (284 - 1414, n=103)	765 MBit/s
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple AirPort Extreme M1	672 (614^min - 682^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1558 (1401^min, 1409.7^P1 - 1609^max) MBit/s +80%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1492 (1365^min - 1583^max) MBit/s +72%
Average of class Subnotebook (467 - 1824, n=56, last 2 years)	1253 MBit/s +45%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (305 - 1757, n=121)	870 MBit/s +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	865 (856^min, 856.29^P1 - 874^max) MBit/s
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	797 (751^min - 821^max) MBit/s -8%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1662 (1600^min - 1681^max) MBit/s +76%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1553 (1443^min - 1620^max) MBit/s +64%
Average of class Subnotebook (772 - 1775, n=56, last 2 years)	1415 MBit/s +50%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	945 (924^min, 924.87^P1 - 968^max) MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (234 - 1696, n=119)	834 MBit/s -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	828 (753^min - 878^max) MBit/s -12%

Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø865 (856-874)

Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø945 (924-968)

网络摄像头

网络摄像头的情况类似于较大的MacBook Pro 14和Apple ，为新Air M2配备了一个1080p的传感器。结合M2的图像处理，效果其实还可以，但考虑到凹槽的大小，我们很确定iPad上的一个更大的传感器（支持中心舞台）也会适合。

ColorChecker Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry: 5.88 ∆E min: 1.75 - max: 11.28 ∆E

维护

拆除底板是很棘手的。你需要一个相应的Pentalobe螺丝刀（P5）和一个我们建议使用的吸盘。前面和侧面都有夹子，必须要松开，还有四个额外的固定装置。卸下螺丝后，我们建议将吸盘放在触控板区域的下方，然后用力拉动以松开夹子。之后，你可以将面板滑向前面，并将其取下。

不过，这样做其实没有什么好的理由。因为没有你可以清洗的风扇，而且所有的组件都被粘在或焊接在逻辑板上，所以没有什么你可以做的。

输入设备 -Apple 使用熟悉的魔法键盘

我们可以对键盘和触控板保持简短，因为没有什么可谈的。Apple ，现在使用我们已经从较大的MacBook Pro型号中知道的标准高度的功能键，包括目前的电源按钮的Touch-ID设计。键盘本身提供了精确的打字体验，但键程仍然很浅。不过你会习惯的，考虑到纤细的基本单元，打字体验还是不错的。相比之下MacBook Air M1相比，新键盘给人留下的印象是略微更坚实、更精确，但差异不大。背景照明仍然很好，通过传感器进行的精细调节仍然是无可匹敌的。

触控板也和以前一样好用，与操作系统的整合也很完美。它仍然是移动领域中最好的触控板。

显示器 - 带有P3和凹槽的Air

新款MacBook Air M2现在有一个中央显示屏凹槽，可以容纳传感器以及网络摄像头，我们已经从较大的MacBook Pro机型中了解到。凹槽旁边的区域用于macOS菜单栏，额外的垂直像素（64）被添加到常规的16:10面板上，因此与MacBook Air M1相比，你得到的屏幕空间略多。MacBook Air M1.你还可以选择在全屏模式下使用应用程序时隐藏菜单栏，所以你基本上只看到16:10的屏幕。偶尔还是会有兼容性问题，但总的来说效果不错，你也会习惯这个凹槽。

除了2560 x 1664像素的略高分辨率，Apple ，还提升了液体视网膜面板（IPS）的其他规格。亮度像MBP 13一样攀升到500尼特，面板现在支持更广泛的P3色域。我们可以确认更高的亮度，但黑值（0.38）相对较高，所以对比度 "只有 "1400：1。

主观的画质非常好，尽管现代的OLED屏幕和较大的Mini-LED面板的MacBook Pro型号的Mini-LED面板提供更清晰的图像。然而，新的MacBook Air M2没有显示出PWM闪烁的迹象，这对一些用户来说肯定是一个优势。高还原度的Windows笔记本电脑仍然遭受偶尔的缩放问题，这对macOS来说绝对不是问题。像精确工作的自动亮度控制或True Tone等功能都非常方便。响应时间对于IPS屏幕来说是不错的，可视角度的稳定性也非常好。在最高亮度下，只有在黑暗的画面上有轻微的背光渗出，这其实并不重要。


458 cd/m²	463 cd/m²	457 cd/m²
507 cd/m²	526 cd/m²	493 cd/m²
488 cd/m²	502 cd/m²	480 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 526 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 486 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 520 cd/m²
Contrast: 1384:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.7
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.25

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6"	Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3"	Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3"	Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K LQ134R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.4"	Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED SDC4172, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3"	Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H TL134GDXP02-0, LTPS, 2520x1680, 13.4"	Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE M133NW4JR0, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.3"
Display		-1%	0%	-12%	4%	-22%	-18%
Display P3 Coverage	98.4	98.6 0%	98.8 0%	76.5 -22%	99.8 1%	65.2 -34%	67.5 -31%
sRGB Coverage	99.9	100 0%	100 0%	100 0%	100 0%	92 -8%	97.1 -3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	87.6	85.9 -2%	87.9 0%	76 -13%	97.8 12%	67.5 -23%	68.8 -21%
Response Times		1%	-20%	-3%	94%	-14%	-47%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	32.9 ?(17.8, 15.1)	31 ?(14, 17) 6%	42 ?(19.9, 22.1) -28%	38.9 ?(21.4, 17.5) -18%	2.1 ?(1.1, 1) 94%	44.8 ?(22, 22.8) -36%	53.2 ?(25.6, 27.6) -62%
Response Time Black / White *	24.9 ?(10.4, 14.5)	26.1 ?(14.9, 11.2) -5%	27.8 ?(14.1, 13.7) -12%	21.9 ?(11.9, 10) 12%	1.68 ?(0.86, 0.82) 93%	22.8 ?(10.4, 12.4) 8%	32.8 ?(16.4, 16.4) -32%
PWM Frequency		118000 ?(49, 155)	117780 ?(56)		240.4 ?(53)	9804 ?(20, 47)
Screen		-5%	11%	-36%	108%	-25%	-7%
Brightness middle	526	417 -21%	514 -2%	494 -6%	336 -36%	468 -11%	379 -28%
Brightness	486	395 -19%	497 2%	474 -2%	338 -30%	450 -7%	356 -27%
Brightness Distribution	87	91 5%	93 7%	89 2%	99 14%	92 6%	88 1%
Black Level *	0.38	0.39 -3%	0.31 18%	0.28 26%	0.02 95%	0.23 39%	0.23 39%
Contrast	1384	1069 -23%	1658 20%	1764 27%	16800 1114%	2035 47%	1648 19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.3	1.12 14%	1.1 15%	3.1 -138%	1.8 -38%	2 -54%	1.6 -23%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.7	2.71 -0%	2.3 15%	4.2 -56%	3.8 -41%	5.5 -104%	2.7 -0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.7	0.77 -10%	0.6 14%	1.5 -114%	1.8 -157%	1.5 -114%	1 -43%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2	1.7 15%	1.8 10%	3.2 -60%	0.9 55%	2.6 -30%	2 -0%
Gamma	2.25 ^98%	2207 ^0%	2.23 ^99%	2.41 ^91%	2.22 ^99%	2.17 ^101%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	6858 ^95%	6870 ^95%	6764 ^96%	6189 ^105%	6580 ^99%	6511 ^100%	6835 ^95%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-2% / -3%	-3% / 4%	-17% / -26%	69% / 84%	-20% / -23%	-24% / -15%

* ... smaller is better

显示器校准已经相当不错了，与P3参考色彩空间相比，色彩偏差已经在理想的范围内（较小的3），但我们用专业的CalMAN软件（X-Rite i1 Pro 2）进行测量时，仍然发现有轻微的偏蓝/偏绿的色彩，同时色温略低。你可能不会注意到这一点，特别是如果你使用真实色调。

我们自己的校准（配置文件可以在上面的方框中免费下载）可以进一步提高性能，也可以消除偏色。P3的色域几乎被完全覆盖。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10.4 ms rise
24.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14.5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17.8 ms rise
32.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15.1 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8734 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Apple 传统上使用反射程度低的光面面板，所以只要你能避免光源的直接反射，在户外就能很好地工作。新款MacBook Air M2的最大亮度增加，显然也有帮助。

性能 -Apple M2和慢速SSD

MacBook Air有两种不同版本的新Apple M2芯片。你总是得到一个8个核心的CPU（4倍性能，4倍效率），但也有8个核心和10个核心的GPU（+100美元）。1199美元的基本型号只能得到8GB内存和256GB固态硬盘，Apple ，升级到16GB内存和512GB固态硬盘的费用各200美元。现在，新机型最多可提供24GB内存和2TB SSD存储。

处理器 -Apple M2

Apple M2的基本处理器架构与旧的M1相比没有变化。旧的M1你仍然可以得到总共8个核心，分布在两个集群中（性能集群和效率集群，各4个核心）。Apple ，确实增加了最大时钟，可以高达 400MHz。然而，这需要额外的功率，我们将在下面看一下效率，但单核消耗从~3.7W增加到~5.3W，多核消耗从~15W增加到~20W。

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2: Ø955 (863.48-1215.33)

Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1; Rosetta 2: Ø843 (817.01-1020.12)

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2: Ø1229 (1226.62-1232.55)

Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P; Ultra-Performance: Ø1512 (1481.98-1677.36)

Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P; Optimized: Ø1066 (983.94-1625.95)

Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U: Ø1607 (1576.98-1742.1)

Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H; Standard: Ø922 (913.26-969.84)

Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H; Performance: Ø958 (953.54-961.86)

Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE AMD Ryzen 7 5800U; max. Performance: Ø1583 (1402.03-1924.93)

Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE AMD Ryzen 7 5800U: Ø1501 (1244.94-1690.47)

Cinebench R15没有在MacBook Air M2上原生运行，但我们的循环显示，新的Air可以比上一代保持最大性能的时间长一些。前代产品.虽然在测试过程中，两台设备越来越接近，几分钟后的差异也不是很大。总而言之，在多核情况下，你必须预期性能下降约30％，但单核性能完全稳定。

我们专注于原生基准测试，如Cinebench R23和Geekbench 5，以进行性能比较。单核性能提高了7％，多核性能提高了约18％。由于更高的时钟，单核性能甚至比M1 Pro略好。M1 Pro和M1 Max芯片相比，单核结果甚至略好于较大的MacBook Pro机型。

CPU的性能在电池供电时没有变化，更多的基准测试列在我们的技术部分.

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core

CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Subnotebook	91 pt
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P	85.1 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro	82.9 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry ^-3! Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	81.6 pt
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	80.8 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	73.4 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2	68.3 pt
Average Apple M2	67.5 pt
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2	63 pt
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1	59.6 pt
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H	55.8 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro	12370 Points +43%
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=63, last 2 years)	11805 Points +36%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	10468 Points +21%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P	9743 Points +12%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	9581 Points +11%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2	8745 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2	8667 Points
Average Apple M2 (8517 - 8772, n=5)	8654 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	8068 Points -7%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1	7409 (6401.39^min - 7409.31^max) Points -15%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H	5186 Points -40%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2172, n=63, last 2 years)	1680 Points +6%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P	1678 Points +6%
Average Apple M2 (1580 - 1638, n=5)	1595 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2	1585 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2	1581 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro	1534 Points -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	1531 Points -3%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1	1496 Points -6%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	1488 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	1430 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H	1218 Points -23%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=58, last 2 years)	4544 Points +104%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	4060 Points +82%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P	3909 Points +75%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	2995 Points +34%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro	2721 Points +22%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2	2349 Points +5%
Average Apple M2 (2231 - 2416, n=5)	2325 Points +4%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2	2231 Points
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H	1982 Points -11%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1 (Rosetta)	1863 Points -16%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P	648 Points +200%
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=58, last 2 years)	637 Points +195%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	564 Points +161%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	560 Points +159%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H	431 Points +100%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1 (Rosetta)	401 Points +86%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro	393 Points +82%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2	381 Points +76%
Average Apple M2 (216 - 446, n=5)	371 Points +72%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2	216 Points

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=65, last 2 years)	1992 Points +64%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE AMD Ryzen 7 5800U (max. Performance)	1925 Points +58%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	1691 Points +39%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	1742 Points +43%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro	1690 (1675^min - 1690^max) Points +39%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P (Ultra-Performance)	1677 (1481.98^min - 1677.36^max) Points +38%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P (Optimized)	1626 (983.94^min - 1625.95^max) Points +34%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core (Rosetta 2)	1320 (1307^min - 1320^max) Points +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2	1229 (1226.62^min, 1226.74^P1 - 1232.55^max) Points +1%
Average Apple M2 (1210 - 1243, n=5)	1222 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2	1215 (863^min - 1215^max) Points
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1 (Rosetta 2)	1020 (817^min - 1020^max) Points -16%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H (Standard)	970 (913.26^min - 969.84^max) Points -20%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H (Performance)	961 Points -21%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=60, last 2 years)	250 Points +13%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P	240 Points +8%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	237 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	229 Points +3%
Average Apple M2 (222 - 229, n=5)	224 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2	223 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2	222 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core (Rosetta 2)	210 Points -5%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro	209 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1 (Rosetta 2)	208 Points -6%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H	208 Points -6%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2	713 Seconds *
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1	710 Seconds * -0%
Average Apple M2 (549 - 713, n=5)	614 Seconds * +14%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2	595 Seconds * +17%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H	509 Seconds * +29%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	391 Seconds * +45%
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=63, last 2 years)	357 Seconds * +50%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P	319 Seconds * +55%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	310 Seconds * +57%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro (Blender 3.0 Beta M1)	183.3 Seconds * +74%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro	12499 Points +40%
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 19529, n=59, last 2 years)	10264 Points +15%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	9942 Points +11%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P	9817 Points +10%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2	8962 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2	8951 Points
Average Apple M2 (8491 - 8994, n=8)	8812 Points -2%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	7613 Points -15%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1	7578 Points -15%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	6995 Points -22%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H	5402 Points -40%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2	1937 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2	1914 Points
Average Apple M2 (1887 - 1953, n=8)	1914 Points 0%
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2555, n=59, last 2 years)	1799 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	1769 Points -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro	1768 Points -8%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1	1727 Points -10%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P	1723 Points -10%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	1514 Points -21%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	1436 Points -25%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H	1430 Points -25%

* ... smaller is better

我们还想看一下新的Apple M2的效率，并与M1进行比较。我们在两台机器上运行了Cinebench R23单核和多核，并记录了软件包的功率，这使我们能够比较效率。这些数字清楚地表明，性能的提高是基于更高的消耗数字（+42 %@单核，~41 %@多核），这意味着与M1相比，效率明显下降。M1 SoC.然而，即使M2在单核效率方面仍然明显领先于英特尔和AMD。与英特尔的Alder Lake芯片相比，其多核优势也仍然令人印象深刻，但AMD也不差，新的Ryzen 7 6800U.

Package Power Cinebench R23 Multi

Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z: Ø21.2 (20.586-21.892)

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z: Ø20.2 (19.771-20.587)

Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q: Ø13.2 (10.435-15.548)

Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256: Ø15 (14.567-15.459)

Power Consumption: Cinebench R23 Single Package Power Efficiency | Cinebench R23 Multi Package Power Efficiency | Cinebench R23 Single Package Power | Cinebench R23 Multi Package Power

Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Single Package Power Efficiency
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	407 Points per Watt +37%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256	403 Points per Watt +36%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	298 Points per Watt 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z	297 Points per Watt
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	219 Points per Watt -26%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R	219 Points per Watt -26%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	78.3 Points per Watt -74%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	64 Points per Watt -78%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	61.8 Points per Watt -79%

Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Multi Package Power Efficiency
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	561 Points per Watt +37%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256	521 Points per Watt +27%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	433 Points per Watt +6%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z	409 Points per Watt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R	399 Points per Watt -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	383 Points per Watt -6%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	374 Points per Watt -9%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	244 Points per Watt -40%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	197.6 Points per Watt -52%

Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Single Package Power
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	29 Watt * -443%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	26 Watt * -387%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	19 Watt * -256%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	7 Watt * -31%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R	7 Watt * -31%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z	5.34 (5.015^min, 5.07638^P1 - 5.962^max) Watt *
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	5.31 (4.821^min, 4.85076^P1 - 5.943^max) Watt * +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256	3.75 (3.575^min, 3.58115^P1 - 4.763^max) Watt * +30%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	3.68 (3.133^min, 3.17243^P0.1, 3.50554^P1 - 5.517^max) Watt * +31%

Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Multi Package Power
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	57 Watt * -169%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	44 Watt * -108%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R	31 Watt * -46%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	28 Watt * -32%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	25 Watt * -18%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z	21.2 (20.586^min, 20.6038^P1 - 21.892^max) Watt *
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	20.2 (19.771^min, 19.7734^P1 - 20.587^max) Watt * +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256	15 (14.567^min, 14.5839^P1 - 15.459^max) Watt * +29%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	13.2 (10.435^min, 10.497^P1 - 15.548^max) Watt * +38%

* ... smaller is better

系统性能

这两款MacBook Pro 13 M2和新的MacBook Air M2都是反应极其灵敏和快速的设备。操作系统运行非常流畅，没有任何停顿，MacBook可以立即从待机状态唤醒。Apple silicon的本地应用程序启动非常快，包括像Adobe Photoshop、Premiere Pro或DaVinci Resolve这样的复杂应用程序。在CrossMark和浏览器测试等合成基准测试中，性能也非常好。

为了完整起见，我们再次包括了PugetBench的结果（Photoshop和Premiere Pro），但该基准只与英特尔版本的应用程序兼容，因此不能代表性能。英特尔版本也明显比原生版本更迟钝。

Air M2的基本型号使用相同的媒体引擎，因此甚至支持高分辨率视频的编辑，包括多个4K ProRes流的并行编辑。当你导出大文件时，你最终会注意到性能下降，但对于偶尔的项目（例如度假视频），性能完全足够。

CrossMark / Overall
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1667 Points +11%
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 2123, n=56, last 2 years)	1590 Points +6%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	1507 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z	1501 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	1501 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1481 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	1355 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012	1352 Points -10%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE Vega 8, R7 5800U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G	1335 Points -11%

CrossMark / Productivity
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1575 Points +15%
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1936, n=56, last 2 years)	1531 Points +12%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1476 Points +8%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012	1424 Points +4%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	1382 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z	1371 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	1371 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE Vega 8, R7 5800U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G	1355 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	1274 Points -7%

CrossMark / Creativity
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1861 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z	1848 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	1848 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	1841 Points 0%
Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2594, n=56, last 2 years)	1749 Points -5%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	1593 Points -14%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1554 Points -16%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE Vega 8, R7 5800U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G	1395 Points -25%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012	1261 Points -32%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012	1425 Points +35%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1418 Points +34%
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=56, last 2 years)	1352 Points +28%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1293 Points +23%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE Vega 8, R7 5800U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G	1118 Points +6%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	1069 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z	1055 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	1055 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	1004 Points -5%

Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K Metal
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	85 fps +13%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z	75 fps
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	75 fps 0%
Average of class Subnotebook (59 - 67, n=3, last 2 years)	64 fps -15%

Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K CPU
Average of class Subnotebook (25 - 32, n=3, last 2 years)	29.7 fps +24%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	24 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z	24 fps
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	24 fps 0%

Photoshop PugetBench / Filter Score
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	81.9 Points +20%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z	68 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	68 Points 0%
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years)	62.8 Points -8%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	61 Points -10%

Photoshop PugetBench / General Score
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years)	86.6 Points +41%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	79.3 Points +29%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z	61.6 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	61.6 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	51 Points -17%

Photoshop PugetBench / GPU Score
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	83.8 Points +19%
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years)	75.6 Points +8%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z	70.2 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	70.2 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	60.6 Points -14%

Photoshop PugetBench / Overall Score
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	806 Points +24%
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years)	747 Points +15%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z	648 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	648 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	560 Points -14%

Premiere Pro PugetBench / GPU 0.9
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	26.2 Points +18%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z	22.2 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	22.2 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	14.3 Points -36%

Premiere Pro PugetBench / Live Playback 0.9
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	81.8 Points +110%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z	39 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	39 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	38.8 Points -1%

Premiere Pro PugetBench / Export 0.9
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	48 Points +16%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z	41.5 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	41.5 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	25.8 Points -38%

Premiere Pro PugetBench / Overall Score 0.9
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	537 Points +60%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z	335 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	335 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	323 Points -4%

Jetstream 2 / Total Score
Average of class Subnotebook (117 - 478, n=37, last 2 years)	294 Points +30%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	239.8 Points +6%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	227.4 Points +1%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	226 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z	225.9 Points
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	211 Points -7%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE Vega 8, R7 5800U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G	199.8 Points -12%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	191.3 Points -15%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	178.7 Points -21%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012	183.8 Points -19%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	379 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z	377 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	377 Points 0%
Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 525, n=58, last 2 years)	308 Points -18%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	304 Points -19%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	281 Points -25%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	288 Points -24%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	270 Points -28%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE Vega 8, R7 5800U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G	249 Points -34%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012	233 Points -38%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 338, n=56, last 2 years)	257 Points +14%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	248 Points +10%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z	226 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	226 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	189 Points -16%

Speedometer 2.0 / Result
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	406.6 runs/min +5%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z	386 runs/min
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	386 runs/min 0%
Average of class Subnotebook (110 - 726, n=28, last 2 years)	365 runs/min -5%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	265 runs/min -31%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	213 runs/min -45%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	204 runs/min -47%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE Vega 8, R7 5800U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G	192.9 runs/min -50%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012	190 runs/min -51%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	176 runs/min -54%

存储设备

MacBook Pro 13 M2和MacBook Air M2的基本型号都配备了256GB固态硬盘，只有一个NAND芯片，因此与配备512GB固态硬盘（两个NAND芯片）的型号，甚至是旧款的基本型号相比，传输速率要低得多。MacBook Air M1.然而，我们不知道Apple ，Air M1是否也改用了较慢的驱动器。

对于你的日常东西来说，传输率基本上还是可以的，你可能甚至不会注意到任何限制，但是带有共享内存的M2芯片会在内存满的时候把数据放在固态硬盘（交换内存）上，这样就会导致性能降低。在我们的审查中，我们只在Adobe Premiere Pro PugetBench测试中真正注意到这一点，与配备1TB固态硬盘的MacBook Air M2相比，视频输出的时间要长很多。这真的取决于你打算如何使用Air M2。如果你同时运行多个应用程序或许多浏览器标签（尤其是Chrome等第三方浏览器），很可能会出现明显的性能下降。如果可能的话，你也应该使用本地应用程序，因为通过Rosetta 2模拟的应用程序也会需要更多的内存。如果你想拥有一台可用于未来几年的设备，我们肯定会推荐你升级到512GB，价格为200美元。

Drive Performance Rating | Blackmagic Disk Speed Test

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple SSD AP0512	100 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	76 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple SSD AP1024Z	59.9 pt
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM) Apple SSD AP0512	57.5 pt
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple SSD AP0256Q	52.5 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple SSD AP0256	50.3 pt
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple SSD AP0256Z	32.1 pt

Blackmagic Disk Speed Test
5GB Read
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple SSD AP0512	5448 MB/s +269%
Average of class Subnotebook (2848 - 5175, n=4, last 2 years)	3469 MB/s +135%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple SSD AP1024Z	2819.3 MB/s +91%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple SSD AP0256	2798 MB/s +90%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple SSD AP0256Q	2756 MB/s +87%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM) Apple SSD AP0512	2728 MB/s +85%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple SSD AP0256Z	1475.8 MB/s
5GB Write
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple SSD AP0512	4463 MB/s +170%
Average of class Subnotebook (2873 - 6431, n=4, last 2 years)	3941 MB/s +138%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple SSD AP1024Z	3036.1 MB/s +84%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM) Apple SSD AP0512	2895 MB/s +75%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple SSD AP0256Q	2431 MB/s +47%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple SSD AP0256	2194 MB/s +33%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple SSD AP0256Z	1652.8 MB/s

GPU性能

我们的基本型号的MacBook Air M2配备的是较慢的 8核GPU最大核心时钟为1398 MHz。在我们的测试中，最大功耗为~10W，因此与旧的8核M1 GPU相当。Apple ，仍然设法提高了GPU的性能，我们看到比8核M1 GPU的优势为~15 %。 8核M1 GPU有15%的优势，比基本的 7核M1 GPU在合成基准测试中的优势。10核M2 GPU 10核M2 GPU则快了约20％，而 14核M1 Pro GPU则明显更强大。

那么，这一切对你的标准日常应用程序意味着什么？8核M2 GPU对于你所有的日常工作来说是绰绰有余的，升级到10个GPU核心并不是真正必要的。除了GPU核心的数量，反正没有什么区别，所谓更快的GPU在持续工作负荷下甚至没有巨大的优势，这两种型号都会失去性能。更快的10核GPU甚至更快地失去了更多性能（22%），而基本型号 "只 "失去了14%。在我们的20分钟压力测试后，10核GPU的优势下降到只有9%，所以我们不建议升级GPU。

图形性能在电池电量上没有减少。请参阅我们的技术部分了解更多GPU基准测试。

3DMark | GFXBench | Geekbench 5.5

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro	10352 Points +82%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	9267 Points +63%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	6823 Points +20%
Average of class Subnotebook (2798 - 8916, n=24, last 2 years)	5997 Points +5%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2	5689 Points
Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	5689 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	4997 Points -12%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1	4515 Points -21%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	4081 Points -28%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	3793 Points -33%
Wild Life Extreme
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro	10351 Points +82%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	9089 Points +60%
Average of class Subnotebook (2001 - 15990, n=8, last 2 years)	7211 Points +27%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	6728 Points +19%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2	5673 Points
Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	5673 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	4950 Points -13%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1	4487 Points -21%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	4057 Points -28%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	3827 Points -33%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	24875 Points +18%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2	21009 Points
Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	21009 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	17731 Points -16%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	17731 Points -16%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1	16159 Points -23%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	14403 Points -31%
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years)	4696 Points -78%

GFXBench
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro	71.7 fps +80%
Average of class Subnotebook (12 - 103.3, n=16, last 2 years)	42.7 fps +7%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2	39.8 fps
Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	39.8 fps 0%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro	166 fps +82%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	147 fps +62%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	109.8 fps +21%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2	91 fps
Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	91 fps 0%
Average of class Subnotebook (31 - 235, n=15, last 2 years)	88.3 fps -3%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	81.2 fps -11%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	78.2 fps -14%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1	72.4 fps -20%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	47.8 fps -47%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro	436 fps +77%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	394 fps +60%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	295 fps +19%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2	247 fps
Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	247 fps 0%
Average of class Subnotebook (85 - 636, n=15, last 2 years)	228 fps -8%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	214.4 fps -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	207 fps -16%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1	192 fps -22%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	120 fps -51%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro	345 fps +73%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	316 fps +58%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	229.9 fps +15%
Average of class Subnotebook (79 - 502, n=9, last 2 years)	213 fps +7%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2	199.9 fps
Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	199.9 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	197 fps -1%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	176.6 fps -12%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1	162 fps -19%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	109.3 fps -45%

Geekbench 5.5
Metal Score
Average of class Subnotebook (30149 - 69352, n=4, last 2 years)	42232 Points +62%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro	42115 Points +61%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	37319 Points +43%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	30166 Points +16%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2	26079 Points
Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	26079 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	21951 Points -16%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	20411 Points -22%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1	19064 Points -27%
OpenCL Score
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro	37867 Points +60%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	35173 Points +49%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	31996 Points +35%
Average of class Subnotebook (11490 - 65287, n=58, last 2 years)	28373 Points +20%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	27602 Points +17%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2	23633 Points
Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	23633 Points 0%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	20364 Points -14%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	19078 Points -19%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	18352 Points -22%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1	17029 Points -28%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	15477 Points -35%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-11300H	15303 Points -35%

游戏性能

要评估MacBooks的游戏性能并不容易。有一些原生游戏（如《魔兽世界》），但即使如此，要可靠地记录fps数字也是一个问题。还有一些仿真游戏，如《古墓丽影》或《边疆3》，你甚至可以使用CrossOver等软件来玩Windows游戏，如《Witcher 3 》，但总是会有一些问题，如图形问题。在Mac上玩的最好方法是Apple's Arcade collection或流媒体服务。

Shadow of the Tomb Raider | Total War: Three Kingdoms

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU	36 fps +50%
Average of class Subnotebook (23 - 38, n=6, last 2 years)	29.7 fps +24%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM) Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU	25 fps +4%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU	24 fps
Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	24 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU	23 fps -4%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU	39 fps +39%
Average of class Subnotebook (25 - 44, n=6, last 2 years)	33.1 fps +18%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU	28 fps
Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	28 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM) Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU	27 fps -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU	25 fps -11%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1, Apple M1 7-Core GPU	22 (16^min) fps -21%

Total War: Three Kingdoms
1920x1080 High (incl textures)
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU	29 fps +61%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM) Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU	25.5 fps +42%
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years)	22 fps +22%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU	20.6 fps +14%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU	18 fps
Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	18 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1, Apple M1 7-Core GPU	17.4 (15^min) fps -3%
1920x1080 Ultra (incl textures)
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU	21 fps +50%
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years)	16 fps +14%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU	14 fps
Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU ()	14 fps 0%

	low	med.	high	ultra
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	62	28	24	20
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019)	77	39	18	14
Borderlands 3 (2019)	43	29.7	16.6	13.4

排放 - 静音运行

系统噪音

新的MacBook Air M2再次使用被动冷却解决方案，因此没有恼人的风扇噪音。在我们审查期间，我们也没有注意到任何电子声音。

温度

Apple 尽管有被动冷却装置，但它的表面温度管理得非常好。在日常工作中，你通常只能注意到温热的表面，甚至在负载下的最高温度也没有超过45℃，这与旧型号相当。然而，芯片本身在多核负载情况下会变得相当热，达到108℃。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


42.6 °C	44.5 °C	38.3 °C
39.3 °C	40.6 °C	35.7 °C
33.4 °C	29.9 °C	32.1 °C

Maximum: 44.5 °C
Average: 37.4 °C


40.4 °C	44.4 °C	42.3 °C
37.7 °C	41.6 °C	39.2 °C
33.5 °C	34.2 °C	34 °C

Maximum: 44.4 °C
Average: 38.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 47.1 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


23.9 °C	23.8 °C	23.6 °C
23.6 °C	23.6 °C	23.4 °C
23.3 °C	23.4 °C	23.4 °C

Maximum: 23.9 °C
Average: 23.6 °C


23.4 °C	23.4 °C	23.5 °C
23.2 °C	23.5 °C	23.6 °C
23.1 °C	23.3 °C	23.5 °C

Maximum: 23.6 °C
Average: 23.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 26.7 °C | Room Temperature 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


42.2 °C	44.9 °C	38.7 °C
39.6 °C	40.8 °C	36.1 °C
35.1 °C	31.6 °C	33.7 °C

Maximum: 44.9 °C
Average: 38.1 °C


41.7 °C	44.1 °C	42.7 °C
38.9 °C	41.9 °C	40.2 °C
34.8 °C	35.7 °C	35.7 °C

Maximum: 44.1 °C
Average: 39.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.7 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.6 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.1 °C / 95.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-6.8 °C / -12.3 F).

	Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU	Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1, Apple M1 7-Core GPU	Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU	Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Heat		-6%	-3%	-11%	-16%	-4%	5%
Maximum Upper Side *	44.5	44 1%	45.1 -1%	41.1 8%	47.9 -8%	42.8 4%	36.5 18%
Maximum Bottom *	44.4	44 1%	43 3%	48.8 -10%	56.1 -26%	46.9 -6%	39.6 11%
Idle Upper Side *	23.9	27 -13%	25.2 -5%	28 -17%	26.8 -12%	25.2 -5%	24.5 -3%
Idle Bottom *	23.6	27 -14%	25.4 -8%	29.3 -24%	27.3 -16%	26 -10%	25 -6%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

对CPU和GPU数据的分析清楚地表明，该芯片不断降低性能，最终在9分钟左右达到了9.5W的水平，这实际上与MacBook Air M1的水平，这一点在下图中也有清楚显示。在压力测试后，性能立即降低，芯片必须冷却后才能再次提供峰值性能。

Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test Package Power: Ø11.7 (8.755-31.792)

Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test Package Power: Ø9.94 (7.319-25.476)

Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø4.94 (3.508-18.952)

Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø3.78 (2.047-14.95)

Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø4.93 (3.505-11.119)

Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø5.07 (3.669-9.485)

发言人

Apple MacBook Air M2配备了一个新的扬声器系统，由四个模块组成，它们位于底座和显示屏之间的铰链区域。声音被引向屏幕，在那里被反射到用户身上。在我们的测量中，新系统的表现非常好，但不比旧的MacBook Air M1.最大音量更高一些，中音更精确一些，但低音更低。从主观上讲，我们也听不出两者之间有什么大的区别，但性能还是非常好，特别是对于一个紧凑的系统。MacBook Pro 14的扬声器MacBook Pro 14的扬声器的扬声器甚至更好。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理--拥有长久耐力的MacBook Air

消耗功率

我们的空闲测量显然受到了新显示器更高的最大亮度的影响，所以结果与前代产品并没有真正的可比性。M2在负载下需要更多的功率，但30W电源适配器是限制因素，它只在TDP下降到19W左右时才足够。35W的PSU也不够用，实际上我们用100W的USB-C电源适配器成功记录了50.4W的最大功率消耗。

当PSU提供至少67W时，MacBook Air M2支持快速充电。我们用100W的设备进行了测试（与最大充电速率相对应），充电时间明显缩短到1.5小时以内。使用默认的30W适配器需要近2.5小时才能将电池充满，而使用可选的35W PSU则需要2小时多一点。

Charging time, device turned on, idle, Wi-Fi on, 150 nits
	30 %	50 %	80 %	90 %	100 %
30瓦PSU	41分钟	69分钟	111分钟	126分钟	147分钟
35瓦PSU	34分钟	57分钟	92分钟	108分钟	122分钟
100瓦PSU	17分钟	28分钟	51分钟	66分钟	85分钟

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.07 / 0.29 Watt
Idle	1.87 / 9.2 / 9.3 Watt
Load	28.5 / 31 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2, M2 8-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0256Z, IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6"	Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1, M1 7-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0256Q, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3"	Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2, M2 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3"	Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.4"	Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3"	Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Phison Electronics PS5012, LTPS, 2520x1680, 13.4"	Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE R7 5800U, Vega 8, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.3"	Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU	Average of class Subnotebook
Power Consumption		13%	-12%	-102%	-56%	-54%	-57%	0%	-62%
Idle Minimum *	1.87	1.9 -2%	1.77 5%	7 -274%	4.8 -157%	4.2 -125%	5 -167%	1.87 ?() -0%	4.47 ?(1.3 - 9.3, n=59, last 2 years) -139%
Idle Average *	9.2	6.4 30%	6.7 27%	11 -20%	8.7 5%	8.1 12%	8.2 11%	9.2 ?() -0%	7.63 ?(2.5 - 16, n=59, last 2 years) 17%
Idle Maximum *	9.3	7 25%	6.9 26%	11.4 -23%	10.1 -9%	9 3%	9 3%	9.3 ?() -0%	9.57 ?(4.1 - 16.8, n=59, last 2 years) -3%
Load Average *	28.5	25 12%	30.9 -8%	59.7 -109%	45.6 -60%	41.7 -46%	45 -58%	28.5 ?() -0%	46.5 ?(19.1 - 78.6, n=57, last 2 years) -63%
Witcher 3 ultra *	27.4		38.9 -42%	49.4 -80%	42.4 -55%	40.1 -46%	45.1 -65%
Load Maximum *	31	30.3 2%	56 -81%	63 -103%	49.5 -60%	68 -119%	51.2 -65%	31 ?() -0%	68.5 ?(24.2 - 121.2, n=59, last 2 years) -121%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø27.4 (22.1-30.9)

Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø26.5 (21.3-31.1)

Power Consumption external screen

Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø8.84 (8.3-9.82)

Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø25.3 (23.2-27.5)

Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø24.4 (18.2-29.6)

Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø2.03 (1.977-2.43)

电池运行时间

Apple 电池容量从49.9Wh略微增加到52.6Wh，但与前代产品相比，Wi-Fi运行时间仍然有点短。稍大的面板在这里肯定也会起作用。在调整亮度为150尼特（从最大亮度开始-7大步和-2小步）的情况下，Wi-Fi运行时间仍然非常好，为15:10小时，但最大亮度将其缩短到只有06:35小时。视频测试的情况也类似，在150尼特的情况下，运行时间从16:29小时降至最大亮度时的06:56小时。

负载下的运行时间取决于M2可以使用高TDP值的时间，以及你在负载期之间让它冷却的程度。我们用Cinebench R23 Multi的10分钟测试来模拟这种情况，并等待一分钟让芯片冷却下来，然后再开始进行测试。结果是运行时间约为2.5小时。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Safari 15.5)		15h 10min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Safari 15.5)		6h 35min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		16h 29min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 24min

	Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2, M2 8-Core GPU, 52.6 Wh	Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1, M1 7-Core GPU, 49.9 Wh	Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 58.2 Wh	Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 55 Wh	Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 67 Wh	Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 60 Wh	Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE R7 5800U, Vega 8, 56 Wh	Average of class Subnotebook
Battery Runtime		5%	22%	-45%	-16%	-35%	-28%	-16%
H.264	989		1153 17%	657 -34%	912 -8%	661 -33%		896 ?(527 - 1251, n=26, last 2 years) -9%
WiFi v1.3	910	960 5%	1144 26%	414 -55%	550 -40%	563 -38%	657 -28%	724 ?(389 - 1585, n=61, last 2 years) -20%
Load	144			76 -47%	146 1%	94 -35%		116.6 ?(57 - 197, n=46, last 2 years) -19%

Pros

+ 高质量和超薄的机箱

+ 良好的输入设备

+ 安静的操作

+ 使用p3和无pwm的显示屏更亮

+ 非常好的扬声器

+ 在150尼特条件下，电池运行时间长

+ 良好的系统性能

+ 磁性安全系统

Cons

- 既不支持Thunderbolt 4，也不支持Wi-Fi 6 160 MHz，而且只支持一个外部屏幕

- 效率比M1 SoC差

- 入门级规格，固态硬盘速度慢

- PSU不足

- 在持续工作负荷下性能下降

- 基本价格高，升级成本高

评语--MacBook Air M2的基本价格太高了

新的MacBook Air M2无疑再次是一个非常好的移动伴侣，但我们在很高的水平上仍然有点失望，这肯定与提高的价格点有关。新机身非常纤细，打字时前缘没有问题，但对于现代设备来说，边框相当宽，此外还有缺口所需的垂直空间，新Air的占地面积比一些Windows对手更大。新的颜色看起来不错，但午夜版（深蓝色）几乎不可能保持清洁，所以我们不推荐它。

其他新功能包括MagSafe连接器的回归，1080p网络摄像头和显示屏。它现在涵盖了与MacBook Pro机型类似的更广泛的P3色域，但我们无法想象Air的许多客户会关心这个。另一方面，增加的亮度绝对是一个优势，特别是如果你经常在路上使用Air，但它也会影响电池运行时间。凹槽看起来不是特别好，但没有实际的限制，而且与旧款相比，你实际上得到了更多的屏幕空间。MacBook Air M1因为凹槽和周围的显示区域位于常规16:10屏幕的顶部。

Apple

新M2面临着与其他制造商相同的问题，新M2的额外性能是以更高的消耗数字为代价的，这就是为什么新M2的效率不如旧M1 SoC。它也有同样的限制，如80MHz的Wi-Fi 6，蓝牙5.0，或只支持一个外部显示器。

新的M2芯片表明，M1或M2的基本潜力分别已经用尽，因为Apple ，效仿英特尔，只是提高了核心的频率，这需要更多的能量。因此，与M1相比，新M2的效率明显较差。被动冷却解决方案表现良好，峰值性能可以保持更长的时间，这对于日常情况来说完全没有问题，但是M2在持续工作负荷下实际上并不比M1快多少。M2的GPU的情况也类似，尽管看起来有了额外的改进。然而，GPU的性能也不稳定，而且可选的10核GPU也没有什么意义，因为在游戏等持续工作负荷下，与基本型号相比，性能优势下降到不到10%。

新款MacBook Air M2再次成为一款非常好的笔记本电脑，尽管存在一些问题。然而，考虑到1199美元的涨价，基本型号实在是太贵了，Apple ，应该在发货时默认配备512GB固态硬盘。如果你只需要8GB内存和256GB存储空间，我们建议你买老款的MacBook Air M1，它的价格要实惠得多，速度也不是真的慢，它的电池寿命甚至更长。

256GB硬盘较慢的问题本来是没有必要的，但说实话，它可能不会困扰大多数用户。我们也不知道Apple ，现在老款MacBook Air M1是否也改用了较慢的驱动器。缺点的清单相当长，考虑到价格，其中一些有点令人讨厌（尽管不充足的PSU在Windows笔记本电脑上也越来越流行），但不可否认的是，MacBook Air M2的整体包装和无风扇设计真的很好，当你只是用它来处理你的日常应用程序时，提到的限制可能不会被注意。然而，与老款MacBook Air M1相比，价格差异肯定会成为一个问题，我们无法想象Apple ，会卖出相同数量的单位。然后是MacBook Pro 13 M2，当你获得相同的规格（10核GPU/67W PSU）时，它实际上要便宜20美元。这也是一款非常好的MacBook，但只有在你需要M2在13英寸外形中的全部性能（而功能更强大的MBP 14太笨重），或者你只是想避免显示屏缺口时，它才有意义。

最初，我们提出了新MacBook Air M2的价格是否合理的问题。我们认为不是，至少只要你还能买到MacBook Air M1。

价格和可用性

你可以，从Apple 商店订购新的MacBook Air.我们的评测装置售价为1199美元，但需要3-4周时间才能发货。我们建议你查看当地商店，以获得更快的供货。

Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry - 07/23/2022 v7 ^(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

89 / 98 → 90%

Keyboard

92%

Pointing Device

100%

Connectivity

61 / 75 → 82%

Weight

72 / 20-75 → 95%

Battery

90%

Display

92%

Games Performance

70 / 78 → 90%

Application Performance

91 / 85 → 100%

Temperature

88%

Noise

100%

Audio

89 / 91 → 98%

Camera

41 / 85 → 48%

Average

83%

92%

Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1699 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 460787 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Apple MacBook Air M2入门评测--非常好，但太贵的日常MacBook

Andreas Osthoff, 2022-07-25 (Update: 2022-07-25)

潜在的竞争对手比较

案例--新的MacBook Air M2更轻薄、更大

尺寸比较

连接性--MagSafe回来了，但Wi-Fi仍然限制在80兆赫以内

沟通

网络摄像头

维护

输入设备 -Apple 使用熟悉的魔法键盘

显示器 - 带有P3和凹槽的Air

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 -Apple M2和慢速SSD

处理器 -Apple M2

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

Package Power Cinebench R23 Multi

系统性能

存储设备

GPU性能

游戏性能

排放 - 静音运行

系统噪音

温度

压力测试

发言人

Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry audio analysis

Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry audio analysis

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry audio analysis

能源管理--拥有长久耐力的MacBook Air

消耗功率

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Power Consumption external screen

电池运行时间

Pros

Cons

评语--MacBook Air M2的基本价格太高了

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison