Apple iPad Pro 9.7 平板电脑简短评测
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 (iPad Pro Series)
Processor
Apple A9X 2 x 2.16 GHz, Cyclone 3
Graphics adapter
Apple A9X / PowerVR Series 7XT
Memory
2048 MB
, LPDDR4
Display
9.70 inch 4:3, 2048 x 1536 pixel 264 PPI, 电容式触控屏幕，10点触控, native pen support, IPS, DCI-P3 Color Gamut, True Tone, glossy: yes
Storage
Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe), 256 GB
, 228 GB free
Weight
444 g, Power Supply: 98 g
Price
1199 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 523 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 499.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.84 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 523 cd/m²
Contrast: 1006:1 (Black: 0.52 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.55% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.97% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.11
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 IPS, 2732x2048, 12.9" | Apple iPad Air 2 2014 IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet Triluminos display with X-Reality, 2560x1600, 10.1" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Super AMOLED, 2048x1536, 9.7" | Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L IPS, 2560x1600, 10.1" | Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -20% | -34% | -175% | -26% | -134% | -134% | |
| Brightness middle | 523 | 399 -24% | 423 -19% | 471 -10% | 358 -32% | 429 -18% | 385 -26% |
| Brightness | 500 | 393 -21% | 427 -15% | 457 -9% | 357 -29% | 434 -13% | 383 -23% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 92 -1% | 92 -1% | 92 -1% | 86 -8% | 82 -12% | 91 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.52 | 0.22 58% | 0.61 -17% | 0.46 12% | 0.35 33% | 0.41 21% | |
| Contrast | 1006 | 1814 80% | 693 -31% | 1024 2% | 1226 22% | 939 -7% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 2.96 -169% | 2.86 -160% | 8.69 -690% | 1.78 -62% | 4.61 -319% | 5.31 -383% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.9 | 9.28 -388% | 8.57 -351% | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 3 -114% | 2.37 -69% | 11.24 -703% | 1.38 1% | 6.64 -374% | 5.58 -299% |
| Gamma | 2.11 104% | 2.21 100% | 2.43 91% | 2.17 101% | 2.24 98% | 2.42 91% | 2.4 92% |
| CCT | 6662 98% | 7049 92% | 6941 94% | 9508 68% | 6366 102% | 6929 94% | 7044 92% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62.97 | 71.15 13% | 88 40% | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.55 | 97.87 -2% | 99 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 137 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 40 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 97 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Geekbench 3 | 3DMark | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | BaseMark OS II | PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 | AnTuTu v6 | Octane V2
| 3DMark | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
Octane V2 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1 | Sunspider | Google V8 Ver. 7 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | BaseMark OS II
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 4 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 4 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
* ... smaller is better
| BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 4 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - Disk Tests (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 4 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0 / 0.37 Watt |
| Idle |  1.71 / 7.55 / 7.62 Watt |
| Load |
8.39 / 12.08 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 27.91 Wh | Apple iPad Air 2 2014 28 Wh | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 39 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE 22 Wh | Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch 25.3 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L 23 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 21% | -38% | 8% | 30% | -119% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.71 | 1.2 30% | 2.69 -57% | 2.3 -35% | 1.6 6% | 8.6 -403% |
| Idle Average * | 7.55 | 5.1 32% | 10.95 -45% | 4.5 40% | 4.13 45% | 11.26 -49% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.62 | 5.4 29% | 11.14 -46% | 5 34% | 4.22 45% | 11.3 -48% |
| Load Average * | 8.39 | 7.9 6% | 11.54 -38% | 9.4 -12% | 6.57 22% | 14.57 -74% |
| Load Maximum * | 12.08 | 11.1 8% | 12.8 -6% | 10.4 14% | 8.32 31% | 14.9 -23% |
* ... smaller is better
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 27.91 Wh, 94.3 | Apple iPad Air 2 2014 28 Wh, 95.3 | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 39 Wh, 93 | Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L 23 Wh, 91.8 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE 22 Wh, 90.3 | Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch 25.3 Wh, 93 | Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet 22 Wh, 93 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -11% | -3% | 1% | -13% | -7% | -7% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1850 | 1364 -26% | 1933 4% | 1261 -32% | 918 -50% | 988 -47% | 2135 15% |
| H.264 | 708 | 562 -21% | 630 -11% | 644 -9% | 651 -8% | 602 -15% | 705 0% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 779 | 695 -11% | 558 -28% | 393 -50% | 698 -10% | 525 -33% | |
| Load | 186 | 212 14% | 195 5% | 323 74% | 291 56% | 266 43% | 166 -11% |
| WiFi | 630 |
Pros
+ 非常优秀的屏幕
+ 稳定的无线网络连接
+ Apple SIM（电子SIM卡）
+ 出色的GPS模组
+ 优秀的扬声器
+ 优秀的电池续航
+ 高速处理器
Cons
- NFC仅支持Apple支付
- 电源适配器较弱，在充电时会变热
- 32GB版本的闪存较慢
- 不支持快速充电
- 加载程序较慢
- 高售价
Apple的iPad Pro 9.7又是一款出色的产品，它延续了一脉相承的优秀特性。它搭配了出色的屏幕，优秀的电池续航，平板中最优秀的相机，对eSIM的支持，以及可选的Apple Pencil和Smart Keyboard。后者只有QWERTY键盘版本可选；我们希望它能够搭配功率更高的电源适配器，以及提供对快速充电的支持。
iPad Pro 9.7和iPad Pro 12.9的组合十分成功，不过它们都售价不菲。
你能享受到高速性能和优秀的扬声器。不过，入门级机型可能无法适合多媒体用途，而升级存储空间需要高达180欧元的支出（约1312人民币）。和尺寸更大的Pro相似的是，Apple给我们带来了一台强劲的设备，不过我们不认为它能够代替笔记本电脑；它的实用性受到了很大限制，作为办公设备屏幕尺寸也过小。Pro 12.9相比就更加适合专业用途。
iPad Pro 9.7适合追求完美的用户。在性能和相机上尤其如此。不过如果你只是需要单纯的多媒体平板电脑的话，那么Air 2完全可以满足需要，如果想要节省一些预算的话可以考虑MediaPad M2。对专业用户来说，iPad Pro 12.9或者Surface Pro 4则更适合，Pixel C也是一个值得考虑的设备。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
- 04/18/2016 v5.1 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Tablet - Weighted Average
Price comparison
