中兴 Axon 7 智能手机简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
LG G5 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
LG G5 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL |
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 328 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.29
ZTE Axon 7 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Lenovo Moto Z Play AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy S7 SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1" | LG G5 IPS Quantum, 2560x1440, 5.3" | HTC 10 Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 20% | 11% | 43% | 33% | 11% | 23% | |
Brightness middle | 328 | 658 101% | 419 28% | 509 55% | 350 7% | 784 139% | 445 36% |
Brightness | 334 | 633 90% | 431 29% | 511 53% | 351 5% | 774 132% | 434 30% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 93 6% | 84 -5% | 93 6% | 98 11% | 91 3% | 93 6% |
Black Level * | 0.66 | 0.43 | 0.36 | ||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.6 | 4.9 -7% | 4.1 11% | 2.2 52% | 2.04 56% | 6.5 -41% | 2.8 39% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14.7 | 9.1 38% | 12 18% | 5.8 61% | 3.25 78% | 11.7 20% | 5.8 61% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 5.8 -107% | 3.3 -18% | 2 29% | 1.63 42% | 8 -186% | 3.7 -32% |
Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.26 97% | 2.1 105% | 2.25 98% | 2.07 106% | 2.22 99% | 2.31 95% |
CCT | 6612 98% | 7840 83% | 6550 99% | 6768 96% | 6391 102% | 8699 75% | 7164 91% |
Contrast | 997 | 1823 | 1236 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 89.38 | 86.86 | 68.08 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 99.35 | 97.46 |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.6 ms rise | |
↘ 1.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.4 ms rise | |
↘ 2.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240.4 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
LG G5 | |
HTC 10 |
Geekbench 3 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
LG G5 | |
HTC 10 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
LG G5 | |
HTC 10 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
LG G5 | |
HTC 10 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
LG G5 | |
HTC 10 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
LG G5 | |
HTC 10 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value) | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
LG G5 | |
HTC 10 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value) | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
LG G5 | |
HTC 10 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value) | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
LG G5 | |
HTC 10 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
LG G5 | |
HTC 10 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
LG G5 | |
HTC 10 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
LG G5 | |
HTC 10 | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
LG G5 | |
HTC 10 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
LG G5 | |
HTC 10 | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
LG G5 | |
HTC 10 |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
LG G5 | |
HTC 10 |
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
LG G5 | |
HTC 10 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
LG G5 | |
HTC 10 |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
LG G5 | |
HTC 10 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
LG G5 | |
HTC 10 |
* ... smaller is better
ZTE Axon 7 | Huawei Honor 8 | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | OnePlus 3 | Lenovo Moto Z Play | Samsung Galaxy S7 | LG G5 | HTC 10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -17% | 7% | 3% | -3% | -6% | -17% | ||
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 78.4 | 79.2 1% | 74.6 -5% | 72.3 -8% | 78.5 0% | 83.3 6% | ||
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 51.3 | 50.1 -2% | 50.6 -1% | 53.6 4% | 45.53 -11% | 65.4 27% | ||
Sequential Read 256KB | 406.5 | 282 -31% | 408.7 1% | 254.8 -37% | 483.8 19% | 427.6 5% | 275.1 -32% | |
Sequential Write 256KB | 150.9 | 188 25% | 153.3 2% | 73.1 -52% | 145.7 -3% | 141.3 -6% | 115.6 -23% | |
Random Read 4KB | 121.1 | 74 -39% | 137.6 14% | 38.78 -68% | 85.9 -29% | 89.3 -26% | 29.92 -75% | |
Random Write 4KB | 16.22 | 7.4 -54% | 18.23 12% | 45.58 181% | 16.01 -1% | 16.22 0% | 15.89 -2% |
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Settings | Value | ||
high | 29 fps | ||
very low | 29 fps |
Dead Trigger 2 | |||
Settings | Value | ||
high | 60 fps |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
ZTE Axon 7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
LG G5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.07 / 0.23 Watt |
Idle | 0.64 / 0.84 / 0.87 Watt |
Load |
6.02 / 10.45 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 3000 mAh | LG G5 2800 mAh | HTC 10 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -47% | -18% | 29% | -1% | -40% | -44% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.64 | 0.83 -30% | 0.57 11% | 0.51 20% | 0.68 -6% | 0.55 14% | 0.68 -6% |
Idle Average * | 0.84 | 2.11 -151% | 1.24 -48% | 0.87 -4% | 1.02 -21% | 1.37 -63% | 1.49 -77% |
Idle Maximum * | 0.87 | 2.12 -144% | 1.36 -56% | 0.9 -3% | 1.14 -31% | 2.25 -159% | 1.91 -120% |
Load Average * | 6.02 | 3.41 43% | 5.92 2% | 1.69 72% | 4.73 21% | 6.24 -4% | 7.4 -23% |
Load Maximum * | 10.45 | 5.46 48% | 10.53 -1% | 4 62% | 7.16 31% | 9.12 13% | 9.71 7% |
* ... smaller is better
ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 3000 mAh | LG G5 2800 mAh | HTC 10 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 39% | 28% | 95% | 10% | -2% | -13% | |
Reader / Idle | 1735 | 1502 -13% | 1338 -23% | 2540 46% | 1810 4% | 1833 6% | 1273 -27% |
H.264 | 704 | 905 29% | 847 20% | 1190 69% | 892 27% | 600 -15% | 648 -8% |
WiFi v1.3 | 411 | 797 94% | 840 104% | 824 100% | 456 11% | 387 -6% | 413 0% |
Load | 245 | 352 44% | 268 9% | 652 166% | 242 -1% | 267 9% | 203 -17% |
Pros
Cons
中兴并没有做出太多承诺:Axon 7在很多方面可以轻松达到高端智能手机如三星 Galaxy S7的水平,尽管整体上依然有些差距。中兴的这台智能手机缺少更完整的功能性,如高速USB接口,更大容量的闪存,无线充电等;也因此无法得到更高的分数。不过,这并不影响Axon 7的超强配置和可以为用户带来的性能表现。
我们十分喜欢它的高品质机身,锐利QHD屏幕,非常优秀的相机模组和不落后于任何一台智能手机的强劲性能。而希望得到一台具备优秀音响效果的用户则除了中兴Axon 7之外几乎没有其他的选择,因为它的杜比Atmos音响系统可以远远把其他同类设备抛至身后。
中兴的Axon 7不仅是三星Galaxy S7等高端智能手机的有力挑战者,它也提供了独一无二的杜比环绕音响系统。
中兴Axon 7的杜比Atmos音响效果远远领先于同类设备。
中兴Axon 7也在一些方面仍有不足,不过也大都无可厚非。一些用户可能不会喜欢它的MiFavor 4.0用户界面——不过用户可以通过应用还原到接近安卓原生系统的界面。Axon 7也需要一个速度更高的USB接口,更长的电池续航和可更换电池设计。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
ZTE Axon 7
- 10/31/2016 v5.1 (old)
Manuel Masiero