中兴 Axon 7 智能手机简短评测

Name: ZTE Axon 7
Brand: ZTE

王座后裔？ 中兴Axon 7的目标是智能手机的最高桂冠。除了极致性能和超强配置，这台5.5寸的高端安卓设备还搭配了杜比Atmos音响系统，它足够让一整个房间充满音乐。

Manuel Masiero, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 11/19/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

ZTE Axon 7 (Axon Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 4 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 530

Memory

4 GB

Display

5.50 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 534 PPI, AMOLED, WQHD, Gorilla Glass 4, glossy: yes

Storage

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 51 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米音响接口, Card Reader: micro-SD 最高支持 128 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速感应器，近距感应器，霍尔感应器，地磁感应器，陀螺仪

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), UMTS (850/900/1700/1900/2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 6 (700, 800, 850, 900, 1700, 1800, 1900, 2100, 2600 MHz), 下载/上传最高 300/50 Mb/s, 辐射值 0.348 W/Kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 151.7 x 75

Battery

3250 mAh Lithium-Ion, 快速充电 3.0, Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 29 h, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 21 h, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 530 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 400 h

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 20 MPix f/1.8, 双LED闪光灯, PD 自动对焦, OIS/EIS 图像防抖, HDR, 视频拍摄最高支持4K/30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f2/2, 定焦, 视频拍摄最高支持1080p/30 FPS

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声扬声器 (杜比 Atmos), Keyboard: 触控, Keyboard Light: yes, 电源适配器，USB-C数据线，耳机接口，保护套，SIM／microSD卡槽工具，micro-USB转接器，快速开始说明，质保卡, MiFavor 4.0, 36 Months Warranty, USB-C, fanless

Weight

175 g, Power Supply: 35 g

Price

449 Euro

Links

ZTE homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	335 MBit/s +12%
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	323 MBit/s +8%
ZTE Axon 7 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash	298 MBit/s
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	256 MBit/s -14%
Lenovo Moto Z Play Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash	112 MBit/s -62%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	31.2 MBit/s -90%
iperf3 receive AX12
ZTE Axon 7 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash	337 MBit/s
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	320 MBit/s -5%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	281 MBit/s -17%
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	257 MBit/s -24%
Lenovo Moto Z Play Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash	121 MBit/s -64%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	32.9 MBit/s -90%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


314 cd/m²	328 cd/m²	349 cd/m²
322 cd/m²	328 cd/m²	351 cd/m²
323 cd/m²	337 cd/m²	358 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 358 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 334.4 cd/m² Minimum: 3.75 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 328 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.29

	ZTE Axon 7 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"	Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Lenovo Moto Z Play AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Samsung Galaxy S7 SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1"	LG G5 IPS Quantum, 2560x1440, 5.3"	HTC 10 Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2"
Screen		20%	11%	43%	33%	11%	23%
Brightness middle	328	658 101%	419 28%	509 55%	350 7%	784 139%	445 36%
Brightness	334	633 90%	431 29%	511 53%	351 5%	774 132%	434 30%
Brightness Distribution	88	93 6%	84 -5%	93 6%	98 11%	91 3%	93 6%
Black Level *		0.66				0.43	0.36
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.6	4.9 -7%	4.1 11%	2.2 52%	2.04 56%	6.5 -41%	2.8 39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	14.7	9.1 38%	12 18%	5.8 61%	3.25 78%	11.7 20%	5.8 61%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.8	5.8 -107%	3.3 -18%	2 29%	1.63 42%	8 -186%	3.7 -32%
Gamma	2.29 ^96%	2.26 ^97%	2.1 ^105%	2.25 ^98%	2.07 ^106%	2.22 ^99%	2.31 ^95%
CCT	6612 ^98%	7840 ^83%	6550 ^99%	6768 ^96%	6391 ^102%	8699 ^75%	7164 ^91%
Contrast		997				1823	1236
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)			89.38		86.86	68.08
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)			100		99.35	97.46

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.6 ms rise
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.4 ms rise
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240.4 Hz

≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	122524 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	62484 Points -49%
OnePlus 3	142090 Points +16%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	61345 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy S7	127902 Points +4%
LG G5	124244 Points +1%
HTC 10	131866 Points +8%

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	2398 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	2199 Points
LG G5	2396 Points
HTC 10	2376 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	5645 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	6401 Points
LG G5	5507 Points
HTC 10	5117 Points

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	23319 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	13955 Points -40%
OnePlus 3	30241 Points +30%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	13920 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy S7	29015 Points +24%
LG G5	28730 Points +23%
HTC 10	27176 Points +17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	24310 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	13466 Points -45%
OnePlus 3	34023 Points +40%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	13437 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy S7	33348 Points +37%
LG G5	32109 Points +32%
HTC 10	30061 Points +24%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	20408 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	15984 Points -22%
OnePlus 3	21771 Points +7%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	15923 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S7	19944 Points -2%
LG G5	20997 Points +3%
HTC 10	20344 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	2698 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	842 Points -69%
OnePlus 3	3424 Points +27%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	827 Points -69%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2715 Points +1%
LG G5	3277 Points +21%
HTC 10	3157 Points +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	4619 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	719 Points -84%
OnePlus 3	4633 Points 0%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	725 Points -84%
Samsung Galaxy S7	3018 Points -35%
LG G5	4468 Points -3%
HTC 10	4581 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	1099 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	2112 Points +92%
OnePlus 3	1789 Points +63%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	1631 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2010 Points +83%
LG G5	1695 Points +54%
HTC 10	1512 Points +38%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	53 fps
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	21 fps -60%
OnePlus 3	60 fps +13%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	23 fps -57%
Samsung Galaxy S7	53 fps 0%
LG G5	47 fps -11%
HTC 10	43 fps -19%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	88 fps
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	23 fps -74%
OnePlus 3	89 fps +1%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	23 fps -74%
Samsung Galaxy S7	84 fps -5%
LG G5	74 fps -16%
HTC 10	73 fps -17%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	28 fps
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	9.7 fps -65%
OnePlus 3	46 fps +64%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	10 fps -64%
Samsung Galaxy S7	27 fps -4%
LG G5	30 fps +7%
HTC 10	24 fps -14%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	39 fps
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	9.9 fps -75%
OnePlus 3	47 fps +21%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	10 fps -74%
Samsung Galaxy S7	40 fps +3%
LG G5	42 fps +8%
HTC 10	39 fps 0%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	16 fps
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	6.1 fps -62%
OnePlus 3	30 fps +88%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	6.7 fps -58%
Samsung Galaxy S7	15 fps -6%
LG G5	17 fps +6%
HTC 10	14 fps -12%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	31 fps
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	6.2 fps -80%
OnePlus 3	31 fps 0%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	6.2 fps -80%
Samsung Galaxy S7	28 fps -10%
LG G5	31 fps 0%
HTC 10	24 fps -23%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	4970 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	6785 Points +37%
OnePlus 3	7101 Points +43%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	6767 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S7	4826 Points -3%
LG G5	5581 Points +12%
HTC 10	5809 Points +17%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	2165 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	1215 Points -44%
OnePlus 3	2496 Points +15%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	1019 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy S7	1987 Points -8%
LG G5	2079 Points -4%
HTC 10	2193 Points +1%
System (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	3307 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	2923 Points -12%
OnePlus 3	3537 Points +7%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	2069 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy S7	4217 Points +28%
LG G5	2925 Points -12%
HTC 10	2806 Points -15%
Memory (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	1489 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	1042 Points -30%
OnePlus 3	2052 Points +38%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	795 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2244 Points +51%
LG G5	1478 Points -1%
HTC 10	1772 Points +19%
Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	4631 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	1019 Points -78%
OnePlus 3	4813 Points +4%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	1013 Points -78%
Samsung Galaxy S7	1723 Points -63%
LG G5	4807 Points +4%
HTC 10	5009 Points +8%
Web (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	963 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	702 Points -27%
OnePlus 3	1112 Points +15%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	649 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy S7	957 Points -1%
LG G5	900 Points -7%
HTC 10	928 Points -4%

Legend

ZTE Axon 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei Honor 8 unknown, ARM Mali-T880 MP4,

Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash

OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Lenovo Moto Z Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy S7 Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

LG G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	8062 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	4905 Points -39%
OnePlus 3	9155 Points +14%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	4979 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy S7	13161 Points +63%
LG G5	9731 Points +21%
HTC 10	8905 Points +10%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	3097 ms *
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	8041 ms * -160%
OnePlus 3	2921 ms * +6%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	8169 ms * -164%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2562 ms * +17%
LG G5	3461 ms * -12%
HTC 10	3146 ms * -2%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	111 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	84 Points -24%
OnePlus 3	122 Points +10%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	83 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy S7	166 Points +50%
LG G5	108 Points -3%
HTC 10	108 Points -3%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	44.75 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	31.12 Points -30%
OnePlus 3	54.4 Points +22%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	31.8 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S7	74 Points +65%
LG G5	49.7 Points +11%
HTC 10	52.1 Points +16%

* ... smaller is better

	ZTE Axon 7	Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	OnePlus 3	Lenovo Moto Z Play	Samsung Galaxy S7	LG G5	HTC 10
AndroBench 3-5		-17%	7%	3%	-3%	-6%	-17%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	78.4	79.2 1%		74.6 -5%	72.3 -8%	78.5 0%	83.3 6%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	51.3	50.1 -2%		50.6 -1%	53.6 4%	45.53 -11%	65.4 27%
Sequential Read 256KB	406.5	282 -31%	408.7 1%	254.8 -37%	483.8 19%	427.6 5%	275.1 -32%
Sequential Write 256KB	150.9	188 25%	153.3 2%	73.1 -52%	145.7 -3%	141.3 -6%	115.6 -23%
Random Read 4KB	121.1	74 -39%	137.6 14%	38.78 -68%	85.9 -29%	89.3 -26%	29.92 -75%
Random Write 4KB	16.22	7.4 -54%	18.23 12%	45.58 181%	16.01 -1%	16.22 0%	15.89 -2%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Settings	Value
	high	29 fps
	very low	29 fps

Dead Trigger 2
	Settings	Value
	high	60 fps

Max. Load

Idle


39.1 °C	39.5 °C	37.5 °C
38.6 °C	39.4 °C	36.5 °C
37.3 °C	38.4 °C	36.1 °C

Maximum: 39.5 °C
Average: 38 °C


35 °C	36.8 °C	37.3 °C
35.4 °C	37.3 °C	37.4 °C
35.3 °C	37.2 °C	37.3 °C

Maximum: 37.4 °C
Average: 36.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 30.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

ZTE Axon 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

LG G5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.07 / 0.23 Watt
Idle	0.64 / 0.84 / 0.87 Watt
Load	6.02 / 10.45 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh	Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh	OnePlus 3 3000 mAh	Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 3000 mAh	LG G5 2800 mAh	HTC 10 3000 mAh
Power Consumption		-47%	-18%	29%	-1%	-40%	-44%
Idle Minimum *	0.64	0.83 -30%	0.57 11%	0.51 20%	0.68 -6%	0.55 14%	0.68 -6%
Idle Average *	0.84	2.11 -151%	1.24 -48%	0.87 -4%	1.02 -21%	1.37 -63%	1.49 -77%
Idle Maximum *	0.87	2.12 -144%	1.36 -56%	0.9 -3%	1.14 -31%	2.25 -159%	1.91 -120%
Load Average *	6.02	3.41 43%	5.92 2%	1.69 72%	4.73 21%	6.24 -4%	7.4 -23%
Load Maximum *	10.45	5.46 48%	10.53 -1%	4 62%	7.16 31%	9.12 13%	9.71 7%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		28h 55min
WiFi Websurfing		6h 51min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		11h 44min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 05min

	ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh	Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh	OnePlus 3 3000 mAh	Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 3000 mAh	LG G5 2800 mAh	HTC 10 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime		39%	28%	95%	10%	-2%	-13%
Reader / Idle	1735	1502 -13%	1338 -23%	2540 46%	1810 4%	1833 6%	1273 -27%
H.264	704	905 29%	847 20%	1190 69%	892 27%	600 -15%	648 -8%
WiFi v1.3	411	797 94%	840 104%	824 100%	456 11%	387 -6%	413 0%
Load	245	352 44%	268 9%	652 166%	242 -1%	267 9%	203 -17%

Pros

+ 安卓 6.0

+ QHD AMOLED 屏幕面板

+ USB-C接口

+ 指纹识别

+ 非常优秀的相机模组

+ 非常强劲的性能

+ 无降频

+ 高品质杜比环绕音效

+ 快速充电功能

Cons

- 不常见的MiFavor 4.0 UI

- USB 2.0接口速度

- 屏幕闪烁亮度控制

- 不可更换电池

- 一般的电池续航

In review: ZTE Axon 7. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de.

中兴并没有做出太多承诺：Axon 7在很多方面可以轻松达到高端智能手机如三星 Galaxy S7的水平，尽管整体上依然有些差距。中兴的这台智能手机缺少更完整的功能性，如高速USB接口，更大容量的闪存，无线充电等；也因此无法得到更高的分数。不过，这并不影响Axon 7的超强配置和可以为用户带来的性能表现。

我们十分喜欢它的高品质机身，锐利QHD屏幕，非常优秀的相机模组和不落后于任何一台智能手机的强劲性能。而希望得到一台具备优秀音响效果的用户则除了中兴Axon 7之外几乎没有其他的选择，因为它的杜比Atmos音响系统可以远远把其他同类设备抛至身后。