Notebookcheck Logo

Beelink SER4迷你电脑评测。AMD Zen 2仍在给英特尔NUC一个交代

Ryzen 7 4800U的老化程度相当高。

通过从Zen+ Ryzen 7 3750H到Zen 2 Ryzen 7 4800U,SER4已经使SER3过时。Ryzen 7 4800U继续密切配合或有时超过由第11代Core i5-1135G7或Core i7-1165G7 CPU驱动的最快英特尔NUC。
Desktop Mini PC AMD Zen Ryzen (Zen)

SER4直接继承了去年的SER3,将旧的Zen+ CPU换成了较新的Zen 2。特别是,SER4采用了非常快速和相对不常见的Ryzen 7 4800U,不幸的是,这款产品在其他产品中很少见。

我们审查的配置包括Ryzen 7 4800U CPU、32GB DDR4-3200内存和512GB NVMe SSD,价格为650美元。一个较小的SKU只有一半的内存,售价低50美元。对英特尔版本感兴趣的用户应该看一下Beelink SEI系列。SER4直接与英特尔NUC系列以及其他采用U系列CPU的迷你电脑竞争。

更多Beelink的评论。

Beelink SER4
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U 8 x 1.8 - 4.2 GHz, 25 W PL2 / Short Burst, 25 W PL1 / Sustained, Renoir-U (Zen 2)
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) - 512 MB VRAM, RAM: 1600 MHz, DDR4, 30.0.15002.1004
Memory
32 GB 
, Crucial DDR4-3200, 22-22-22-52, Dual-Channel
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, 512 GB 
Soundcard
AMD Raven/Renoir/VanGogh/Cezanne - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Connections
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), MediaTek RZ608 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 40 x 126 x 113
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Additional features
12 Months Warranty
Weight
494 g, Power Supply: 218 g
Price
600 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price

v (old)
04 / 2022
Beelink SER4
R7 4800U, Vega 8
494 g40 mmx

v (old)
02 / 2022
GMK NucBox 3
Celeron J4125, UHD Graphics 600
410 g32.5 mmx

v (old)
01 / 2022
Beelink GTR5
R9 5900HX, Vega 8
686 g39 mmx

v (old)
Intel NUC11PAQi7
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
647 g56 mmx

v (old)
11 / 2021
Beelink SER3
R7 3750H, Vega 10
492 g40 mmx

v (old)
Intel NUC10i5FNK
i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620
493 g36 mm0.00"0x0

尺寸比较

168 mm 120 mm 39 mm 686 g117 mm 112 mm 56 mm 647 g126 mm 113 mm 40 mm 494 g126 mm 113 mm 40 mm 492 g128 mm 128 mm 32.5 mm 410 g117 mm 112 mm 36 mm 493 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

连接性 - 不支持Thunderbolt

端口选项与SER3上提供的相同。请注意,如果业主丢失了包装盒中的专有桶状交流适配器电缆,可以用某些USB-C交流适配器为SER4供电。

正面:2个USB 3.0,USB-C,3.5毫米组合音频,电源按钮
正面:2个USB 3.0,USB-C,3.5毫米组合音频,电源按钮
后部。千兆RJ-45,2个USB 3.0,2个HDMI 2.0,AC适配器
后部。千兆RJ-45,2个USB 3.0,2个HDMI 2.0,AC适配器
对。没有端口
对。没有端口
左边:没有端口
左边:没有端口

沟通

可拆卸的M.2 WLAN模块位于主要的M.2 SSD下面。SER4是首批搭载Wi-Fi 6E联发科RZ608的迷你电脑之一,比SER3中的英特尔7265有了巨大的升级。
可拆卸的M.2 WLAN模块位于主要的M.2 SSD下面。SER4是首批搭载Wi-Fi 6E联发科RZ608的迷你电脑之一,比SER3中的英特尔7265有了巨大的升级。
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Beelink SER4
MediaTek RZ608
821 (758min - 891max) MBit/s
Beelink GTR5
MediaTek RZ608
657 (321min - 735max) MBit/s -20%
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
546 (369min - 618max) MBit/s -33%
Beelink SER3
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
359 (321min - 383max) MBit/s -56%
GMK NucBox 3
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
152 (106min - 184max) MBit/s -81%
iperf3 receive AX12
Beelink SER4
MediaTek RZ608
880 (842min - 900max) MBit/s
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
862 (809min - 916max) MBit/s -2%
Beelink GTR5
MediaTek RZ608
837 (806min - 876max) MBit/s -5%
GMK NucBox 3
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
671 (648min - 684max) MBit/s -24%
Beelink SER3
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
641 (594min - 665max) MBit/s -27%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850Tooltip
Beelink SER4; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø879 (842-900)
Beelink SER4; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø822 (758-891)

维护

底部面板由四颗飞利浦螺钉固定,与SER3的情况很相似。然而,我们的SER4设备上的面板被卡住了,即使在拧开所有的螺丝后也很难取出。我们建议将安装板作为一个锚,以便更容易地抓取和拉出底板。

有趣的是,SER4上缺少BIOS电池,而我们的SER3上却有。可能是制造商把这一代的电池移到了主板的另一侧。

配件和保修

零售包装盒包括一个可拆卸的壁挂式VESA支架、AC适配器、两条HDMI短线和一本手册。标准的一年有限制造商保修,而大多数英特尔NUC系统的保修期为三年。

性能 - 比大多数U系列迷你电脑更快

 
 

测试条件

在运行以下任何性能基准测试之前,我们的设备通过Windows设置为性能模式。

处理器 - 8核16线程的U系列CPU

CPU性能是所有采用U系列CPU的迷你PC中最快的之一,是对旧版U系列CPU的一次重大升级。 Ryzen 7-3750H在SER3中的表现。该系统没有表现出重大的节流行为,正如我们下面的CineBench R15 xT循环测试结果所体现的那样。这实际上允许 Ryzen 7 4800U在我们的Beelink中的表现超过了较新的 Ryzen 7 5800U中的 ThinkPad 13s.

单线程性能平平,但总体上仍然非常好,结果接近于酷睿i5-1135G7.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900Tooltip
Beelink SER4 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U: Ø1404 (1390.29-1411.03)
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE AMD Ryzen 7 5800U; max. Performance: Ø1583 (1402.03-1924.93)
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE AMD Ryzen 7 5800U: Ø1501 (1244.94-1690.47)
Intel NUC11PAQi7 Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø969 (962.77-985.76)
Intel NUC10i7FNH Intel Core i7-10710U: Ø946 (834.01-1067.02)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Beelink GTR5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4596 Points +42%
Beelink SER4
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
3248 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
  (2943 - 3306, n=4)
3178 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
2995 Points -8%
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
2657 Points -18%
Intel NUC11TNKi5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1974 Points -39%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel Core i5-10210U
1820 Points -44%
Beelink SER3
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
1514 Points -53%
Infinix INBook X2
Intel Core i7-1065G7
1296 Points -60%
GMK NucBox 3
Intel Celeron J4125
430 Points -87%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1411 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
72.1 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
187 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3248 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
488 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
8376 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1240 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Beelink GTR5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Vega 8
98.4 pt
Beelink SER4
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, Vega 8
72.9 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
 
71 pt
Beelink SER3
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, Vega 10
31.2 pt
GMK NucBox 3
Intel Celeron J4125, UHD Graphics 600
10.5 pt

系统性能

PCMark 10的结果与运行在11代酷睿i7-1165G7上的英特尔NUC 11相当,甚至略高。然而,我们怀疑,如果我们的英特尔测试装置没有被限制在单通道内存上,英特尔模型的得分可能会更高。

PCMark 10 / Score
Beelink GTR5
Vega 8, R9 5900HX, Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN
6504 Points +24%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (5233 - 5383, n=3)
5291 Points +1%
Beelink SER4
Vega 8, R7 4800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5257 Points
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 500GB MZ-V8P500BW
5158 Points -2%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
4019 Points -24%
Beelink SER3
Vega 10, R7 3750H, GSemi AZW GSDFN512TS3F1OGCX
3818 Points -27%
GMK NucBox 3
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron J4125, Netac S535N8/256GYN
1707 Points -68%
PCMark 10 Score
5257 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Beelink GTR5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Vega 8
42079 MB/s +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
  (37086 - 40961, n=2)
39024 MB/s +5%
Beelink SER4
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, Vega 8
37086 MB/s
Beelink SER3
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, Vega 10
16249 MB/s -56%
GMK NucBox 3
Intel Celeron J4125, UHD Graphics 600
12738 MB/s -66%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

LatencyMon显示,在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时没有DPC问题。在60 FPS下的4K视频播放几乎完美,在我们长达1分钟的视频中只有2个丢帧。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
GMK NucBox 3
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron J4125, Netac S535N8/256GYN
1913 μs * -469%
Beelink SER3
Vega 10, R7 3750H, GSemi AZW GSDFN512TS3F1OGCX
697 μs * -107%
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 500GB MZ-V8P500BW
568 μs * -69%
Beelink SER4
Vega 8, R7 4800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
336 μs *
Beelink GTR5
Vega 8, R9 5900HX, Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN
116 μs * +65%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备 - PCIe3 x4 + 2.5英寸SATA III

我们的测试装置包括一个512GB 英特尔SSD 660p这是一款经济型PCIe3 x4 NVMe SSD。连续读取率最高只有1400MB/s左右,而更高端的PCIe3或PCIe4驱动器则分别为>3000MB/s或>7000MB/s。然而,对于目标受众来说,英特尔660p将是足够的。

CDM 8
CDM 8
AS SSD
AS SSD
主要的M.2 PCIe3 x4 2280插槽,带隔热垫
主要的M.2 PCIe3 x4 2280插槽,带隔热垫
次要的2.5英寸SATA III插槽用于额外存储
次要的2.5英寸SATA III插槽用于额外存储
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1837 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 979 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 339 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 443.1 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1629 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 976 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 62.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 183.3 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 500GB MZ-V8P500BW
89.7 pt
Beelink GTR5
Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN
50.6 pt
Beelink SER4
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
46.7 pt
Beelink SER3
GSemi AZW GSDFN512TS3F1OGCX
39.8 pt
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
30.8 pt
GMK NucBox 3
Netac S535N8/256GYN
9.6 pt

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

075150225300375450525600675750825900975105011251200127513501425Tooltip
Beelink SER4: Ø1407 (1225.09-1439.28)

GPU性能--与Iris Xe 80 EUs齐头并进

集成的 芯片尽管它是一两代人的产品,但GPU仍然非常好。3DMark的结果比竞争者的Iris Xe 96慢20%到30%。 Iris Xe 96EUs在双通道内存上运行,或者如果上述英特尔GPU在单通道内存上运行,则大约快5%到20%。在1080p或720p的低设置下期待超过30FPS并不是不合理的,这取决于标题。

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Time Spy
Time Spy
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Fire Strike 超强
Fire Strike 超强
 
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Beelink GTR5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
34507 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
29771 Points +9%
Beelink SER4
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
27339 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (13941 - 36134, n=48)
26735 Points -2%
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
22393 Points -18%
Beelink SER3
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
13791 Points -50%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U
9113 Points -67%
GMK NucBox 3
Intel UHD Graphics 600, Intel Celeron J4125
2453 Points -91%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
5410 Points +38%
Beelink GTR5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4493 Points +14%
Beelink SER4
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
3927 Points
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
3724 Points -5%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (1694 - 5041, n=56)
3661 Points -7%
Beelink SER3
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
2027 Points -48%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U
1202 Points -69%
GMK NucBox 3
Intel UHD Graphics 600, Intel Celeron J4125
378 Points -90%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1618 Points +30%
Beelink GTR5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1441 Points +16%
Beelink SER4
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
1241 Points
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1168 Points -6%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (540 - 1557, n=56)
1150 Points -7%
Beelink SER3
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
609 Points -51%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U
396 Points -68%
GMK NucBox 3
Intel UHD Graphics 600, Intel Celeron J4125
102 Points -92%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1793 Points +27%
Beelink GTR5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1647 Points +17%
Beelink SER4
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
1412 Points
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1316 Points -7%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (620 - 1781, n=57)
1309 Points -7%
Beelink SER3
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
690 Points -51%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U
456 Points -68%
GMK NucBox 3
Intel UHD Graphics 600, Intel Celeron J4125
117 Points -92%
3DMark 11 Performance
6285 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22021 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3545 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1412 points
Help
The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
98.7 (60min) fps +54%
Beelink GTR5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
86.9 (77min) fps +35%
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
70.3 (63min) fps +10%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (27.2 - 89, n=47)
65.9 fps +3%
Beelink SER4
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
64.2 (51min) fps
Beelink SER3
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
35.7 (28min) fps -44%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
62.8 (58min) fps +39%
Beelink GTR5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
55.2 (52min) fps +22%
Beelink SER4
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
45.2 (41min) fps
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
43.7 (40min) fps -3%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (19.6 - 55.2, n=35)
40.8 fps -10%
Beelink SER3
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
22.9 (21min) fps -49%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
35 (31min) fps +55%
Beelink GTR5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
26.8 (25min) fps +19%
Beelink SER4
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
22.6 (21min) fps
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
20.7 (18min) fps -8%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (8.7 - 26.8, n=46)
20.6 fps -9%
Beelink SER3
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
12.2 (11min) fps -46%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Beelink GTR5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
17.1 (15min) fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
16.5 (13min) fps +15%
Beelink SER4
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
14.3 (13min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (7.07 - 17.6, n=49)
13.7 fps -4%
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
10.3 (9min) fps -28%
Beelink SER3
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
8 (7min) fps -44%

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Beelink SER4: Ø69.8 (65-73)
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 110 98.3 29.6 13.4
The Witcher 3 (2015) 64.2 45.2 22.6 14.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 103 83.3 53.1 51.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 37.3 19.2 13.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 41.1 33.2 29.5
Far Cry 5 (2018) 46 22 20 19
Strange Brigade (2018) 82.3 33.3 28.1 24

排放

系统噪音 - 恼人的脉动行为

风扇噪音可能是SER4最糟糕的方面。虽然没有像Ryzen 9 H-powered GTR5的噪音,但对于U系列迷你PC来说,SER4的噪音仍然很大。例如,在桌面上空转,足以导致33.2 dB(A)的风扇噪音,而安静的背景是23.4 dB(A)。像网页浏览或视频流这样的低处理负荷可能会恼人地导致风扇在33至39分贝(A)之间波动。相比之下,英特尔NUC 11能够在更长时间内保持安静,甚至接近无声。

在运行游戏负载时,风扇噪音可高达40 dB(A),而NUC 11只有34 dB(A)。

风扇噪音曲线(白色。背景,红色。系统空闲,蓝色:3DMark 06,橙色。Witcher 3,绿色。Prime95压力)
风扇噪音曲线(白色。背景,红色。系统空闲,蓝色:3DMark 06,橙色。Witcher 3,绿色。Prime95压力)

Noise Level

Idle
33.2 / 33.2 / 33.2 dB(A)
Load
38.6 / 40.8 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23.4 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.141.93638.437.8253237.628.228.531.23126.539.323.426.128.84024.232.125.323.625.9503131.424.724.3346324.432.529.123.726.68025.337.62627.130.210022.433.723.22224.912521.330.321.317.624.316023.126.63314.537.620023.125.922.215.929.525022.124.325.715.82631522.622.922.616.723.540024.122.819.315.324.150022.922.620.613.324.363023.522.118.311.924.280023.923.218.110.324.7100026.726.119.99.728.8125027.727.121.19.528.6160028.527.822.79.829.720003029.424.410.131.7250029.128.522.710.430.431503029.521.910.530.9400027.92721.21130.6500025.724.71811.227.7630023.1221511.425.7800019.118.715.211.421.51000018.918.717.611.519.41250021.821.520.711.421.8160001513.812.210.915.3SPL39.238.633.223.440.8N2.92.91.80.53.6median 23.1median 24.7median 21.1median 11.4median 25.7Delta2.732.42.63.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseBeelink SER4
Beelink SER4
Vega 8, R7 4800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Beelink GTR5
Vega 8, R9 5900HX, Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 500GB MZ-V8P500BW
Beelink SER3
Vega 10, R7 3750H, GSemi AZW GSDFN512TS3F1OGCX
Noise
-6%
8%
11%
off / environment *
23.4
23.1
1%
25.6
-9%
23.4
-0%
Idle Minimum *
33.2
34.2
-3%
25.6
23%
23.4
30%
Idle Average *
33.2
34.2
-3%
25.6
23%
23.4
30%
Idle Maximum *
33.2
34.2
-3%
25.6
23%
29.4
11%
Load Average *
38.6
44.6
-16%
33.6
13%
35.2
9%
Witcher 3 ultra *
39.2
41.4
-6%
33.6
14%
37.2
5%
Load Maximum *
40.8
45.1
-11%
54.5
-34%
43.3
-6%

* ... smaller is better

温度 - 保持顶部清洁

游戏时,AC适配器可以达到50℃以上
游戏时,AC适配器可以达到50℃以上

表面温度不是一个问题。该设备的六个侧面中的四个都有通风格栅,用于空气流动。冷空气从顶部表面进入,因此不建议在设备顶部放置任何纸张或书籍。

系统空闲(正面)
系统空闲(正面)
系统空闲(背面)
系统空闲(背面)
Prime95压力(前)。
Prime95压力(前)。
Prime95压力(背部)
Prime95压力(背部)

压力测试

当在Prime95下受压时,CPU将无限期地提升到2.8 GHz,并且SoC温度稳定在64 C。在英特尔NUC11PAQi7上运行同样的测试,将导致核心温度升高到79 C。

系统空闲
系统空闲
Witcher 3 压力
Witcher 3 压力
Prime95压力
Prime95压力
Prime95+FurMark压力
Prime95+FurMark压力
CPU时钟(GHz) GPU时钟(MHz) CPU平均温度SoC(℃)
系统空闲 -- -- 37
Prime95压力 2.8 -- 64
Prime95 + FurMark压力 2.9 870 62
Witcher 3 应力 0.6 1525 58

能源管理

消耗功率

SER4要求的功率与英特尔NUC11PAQi7差不多,尽管它们的性能存在差异。换句话说,与Core i7-1165G7 NUC相比,Beelink系统提供了更高的CPU每瓦性能,但GPU每瓦性能较低。

当同时运行Prime95和FurMark时,我们能够从小型()()57瓦的壁挂式交流适配器中记录到49瓦的最大功耗。如果连接额外的USB设备,如显示器或智能手机,这个数字甚至可以被抬高。

3DMark 06的耗电量
3DMark 06的耗电量
Witcher 3 1080p的超强设置功耗
Witcher 3 1080p的超强设置功耗
运行Prime95时持续消耗39W
运行Prime95时持续消耗39W
Prime95+FurMark的压力在10秒处启动
Prime95+FurMark的压力在10秒处启动
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.56 / 0.73 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.1 / 4.1 / 4.6 Watt
Load midlight 35.6 / 39.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Beelink SER4
R7 4800U, Vega 8, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, , x,
GMK NucBox 3
Celeron J4125, UHD Graphics 600, Netac S535N8/256GYN, , x,
Beelink GTR5
R9 5900HX, Vega 8, Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN, , x,
Intel NUC11PAQi7
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 500GB MZ-V8P500BW, , x,
Beelink SER3
R7 3750H, Vega 10, GSemi AZW GSDFN512TS3F1OGCX, , x,
Intel NUC10i5FNK
i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1, , 0x0, 0"
Power Consumption
36%
-89%
-34%
-50%
-165%
Idle Minimum *
4.1
3
27%
6.2
-51%
5.6
-37%
7
-71%
Idle Average *
4.1
3.1
24%
8.9
-117%
5.6
-37%
9.1
-122%
15.7
-283%
Idle Maximum *
4.6
3.6
22%
9
-96%
6
-30%
9.7
-111%
Load Average *
35.6
11.1
69%
66.8
-88%
31.4
12%
29.5
17%
Witcher 3 ultra *
35.6
62.6
-76%
39
-10%
32.5
9%
Load Maximum *
39.9
25.4
36%
81.6
-105%
80.5
-102%
48.7
-22%
58.6
-47%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest

05101520253035Tooltip
Beelink SER4; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø35.6 (33.4-37)
Beelink SER4; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø38.5 (37.8-39.5)

{

05101520253035Tooltip
Beelink SER4; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø38.6 (37.9-39.9)
Beelink SER4; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø34.8 (34-35.5)
Beelink SER4; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø35.7 (34.2-37)
Beelink SER4; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø35.6 (33.4-37)

Pros

+ 卓越的多线程CPU性能
+ 2个SODIMM + 2个存储插槽
+ 支持USB-C PD和DP
+ Wi-Fi 6E是标准配置

Cons

- 不支持PCIe4 x4或Thunderbolt
- 一年的保修期,而不是三年
- 风扇频繁跳动
- 没有裸机选项

结论--高性能--每美元

在审查中。Beelink SER4。测试装置由Beelink提供
在审查中。Beelink SER4。测试装置由Beelink提供

在亚马逊上,用户以600美元的价格获得Ryzen 7 4800U CPU,配备16GB内存、Windows 11 Pro许可证和512GB SSD。相比之下,一个光秃秃的 英特尔NUC 11的零售价刚刚超过700美元,没有操作系统、内存或存储。SER4提供更快的多线程CPU性能,而价格却大大低于英特尔的选择,这是它最值得注意的特点。

SER4已经使SER3过时了。它的Ryzen 7 4800U处理器毫不逊色,其速度可与任何由Core U驱动的英特尔NUC 11选项相媲美。

SER4最明显的缺点是它的风扇噪音比英特尔NUC要大。我们在许多其他Beelink迷你电脑上也经历过这种情况,SER4继续保持这种趋势。较小的缺点包括:与Iris Xe 96 EUs相比,图形性能稍慢,一年基本保修而不是三年,支持PCIe3 SSD而不是PCIe4,不支持Thunderbolt,以及比Intel NUC更不发达的BIOS UI。如果这些缺点不是主要问题,那么SER4作为英特尔NUC的替代品是一个强有力的推荐。

价格和可用性

亚马逊 目前,Beelink SER4的发货价格为750美元起,或者使用适用的优惠券更低。另外,用户也可以直接从Beelink购买。.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Beelink SER4迷你电脑评测。AMD Zen 2仍在给英特尔NUC一个交代
Allen Ngo, 2022-04-10 (Update: 2022-04-10)