Notebookcheck Logo
Bigme Hibreak review

Bigme Hibreak 智能手机评测--彩色显示屏电子墨水手机实现高帧率

智能手机电子阅读器

电子墨水显示屏速度太慢,无法正常使用?Bigme 旨在消除这种偏见,证明你可以把 HiBreak 当作普通智能手机使用,同时享受电子纸的所有好处。但是,HiBreak 还能以可接受的方式显示视频吗?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
E-Ink Android ARM Smartphone

比格米-希布雷克判决

事实上,通过 Hibreak,Bigme 已经成功地向市场推出了首批基于电子墨水的产品,这些产品还能以合理的帧频(根据制造商的说法,最高可达 21fps)显示视频。当然,电子纸还无法提供 LED 或 OLED 显示屏的色彩范围,而且在显示色彩时,分辨率也明显较低。尽管如此,Bigme 通过非常经济的屏幕所获得的显示质量还是给我们留下了深刻的印象。

这一概念的优势还在于出色的可读性,即使在明亮的环境中也无需额外的照明。此外,根据手机的使用方式,电池续航时间也非常长。由于电子墨水显示屏在显示单个图像后显示的内容仍然存在,因此不会出现任何闪烁现象,非常适合对这个问题敏感的用户使用。

除此之外,它还是一款功能齐全的 4G 智能手机,具有电话功能、定位功能、128GB 存储空间、扬声器和摄像头。虽然你不应该对后两者的质量抱有特别高的期望。

此外,软件更新也不会太频繁,这意味着你很可能只能使用较旧的Android 11。电子墨水显示屏通常非常耐用,但实际上并不是为 Bigme Hibreak 提供的高刷新率而设计的。这意味着屏幕的耐用性最终还是会有耗尽的风险。

如果你正在寻找第二部手机,能够在日常生活中很好地利用电子墨水技术的优势,只是偶尔看一下视频,那么 Bigme Hibreak 就是一款技术精湛、与众不同的智能手机,在很多情况下都相当实用。

Pros

+ 无闪烁、色彩丰富的电子墨水显示屏...
+ ... 在相对较快的帧速率下...
+ ... 高亮度
+ 坚固的外壳
+ 手机和卫星导航
+ 存储空间大
+ 兼容Android 应用程序
+ 有声读物扬声器
+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 塑料底盘手感欠佳
- 只适合在紧急情况下拍摄视频
- 摄像头质量差
- 在可持续性方面几乎不做任何努力
- 彩色显示分辨率低
- 预计未来不会更新

价格和供应情况

Bigme Hibreak 可直接从制造商处购买https://store.bigme.vip/products/bigme-hibreak-smartphone?variant=43652835213491&currency=USD&gad_source=1&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIkvGhlNuLiwMVH5FQBh0WCTFBEAAYASAAEgLJhPD_BwE黑白款售价 249 美元,彩色款售价 279 美元。在亚马逊网站上,黑白款售价 269 美元彩色款售价 279 美元

Amazon Logo
$279.99
Bigme Color E-Ink Screen Mobile Hibreak, 6G+128GB Android 11 Smartphone, 36-Level Front Light, USB-C, 3300mAh Battery, 5+13MP Camera - Black

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
65.4%
Bigme Hibreak
Bigme Hibreak
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 ⎘
PowerVR GE8320 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC
Amazon: $279.99
List Price: 279€
170 g128 GB eMMC Flash5.84"
1440x720
276 PPI
E-Ink
2.
79.8% v7 (old)
Onyx Boox Palma
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 610 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $279.99
BOOX Palma 2 Mobile ePaper F...
2. $245.99
BOOX Palma Mobile ePaper 6G ...
3. $9.90
Healing Shield Screen Protec...
List Price: 300€
170 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.13"
1648x824
301 PPI
E-Ink
3.
77.2% v7 (old)
Onyx Boox Page
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 610 ⎘
3 GB Memory, 32 GB eMMC
Amazon:
1. $12.90
Healing Shield Screen Protec...
2. $9.99
Aircawin Case for 7'' for On...
3. $9.99
BOZHUORUI Clear Case for 7" ...
List Price: 290€
195 g32 GB eMMC Flash7.00"
1682x1264
301 PPI
E-Ink
4.
69.5%
PocketBook Verse Pro Color
PocketBook Verse Pro Color
unknown ⎘
unknown ⎘
1 GB Memory, 16 GB eMMC
Amazon: $169.00
List Price: 169€
182 g16 GB eMMC Flash6.00"
1448x1072
300 PPI
E-Ink
5.
67.9%
Tolino Shine Color
Tolino Shine Color
MediaTek MTK 8113T ⎘
 ⎘
0.5 GB Memory, 16 GB eMMC
Amazon:
1. $14.99
Xuanbeier Case for Kobo Clar...
2. $10.89
kwmobile Case Compatible wit...
3. $14.99
Xuanbeier Case Compatible wi...
List Price: 149€
173 g16 GB eMMC Flash6.00"
1448x1072
300 PPI
E-Ink Kaleido 3

Bigme 是一家专门生产基于电子墨水的屏幕设备的公司。其中许多产品都是在众筹活动的帮助下共同获得资金的。电子墨水显示屏有许多优点,但通常需要较长的时间来更新屏幕内容。因此,它们不适合用于视频或游戏等快速变化的内容。

制造商将 Hibreak E-Ink 智能手机送到了我们的测试实验室,在我们面前的这款设备据说可以提供高达 21fps 的速度。此外,配备可选彩色显示屏的机型还声称可以很好地显示动态图像。让我们仔细看看这款售价 279 美元的小玩意儿。

规格

Bigme Hibreak
Processor
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 8 x 1.8 - 2.3 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
Display
5.84 inch 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixel 276 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, E-ink, color resolution: 480 x 240 pixel, glossy: yes, 21 Hz
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 100 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, dedicated
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G, 3G, 4G (B1/2/3/5/7/8/20/28/34/38/39/40/41), LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 154 x 76.8
Battery
3300 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix LED flash
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, silicone bumper, SIM tool, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
170 g
Price
279 Euro
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

机箱和功能 - 朴实无华的塑料机箱

你不应对 Bigme Hibreak 的机身抱有过高的期望:塑料是它的主要材料,后部的皮革纹理让手机更容易抓握。总之,Bigme Hibreak 的制造质量是干净利落的,而且智能手机具有很强的抗扭曲和抗压能力。

屏幕正面的边框显得相当宽,尤其是顶部和底部,让智能手机看起来有些老气。Hibreak 仅重 170 克,拿在手里相当轻巧。

128 GB 的大容量存储空间非常超值,尤其是与其他电子阅读器相比,后者的存储空间往往很小。6GB RAM 也是如此,因为它允许你运行更复杂的应用程序和多任务。

除此之外,你不应该期待太多额外的技术。底部的 USB 2.0 端口用于数据交换和充电,而蓝牙 5.0 则是与其他设备进行无线通信的相当古老的标准。遗憾的是,你将无法使用 NFC 进行非接触式支付。

内置 nano-SIM 卡插槽和 microSD 卡插槽。

尺寸比较

160 mm 112 mm 9.1 mm 173 g159 mm 80 mm 8 mm 170 g156 mm 108 mm 7.6 mm 182 g154 mm 76.8 mm 8.6 mm 170 g156 mm 137 mm 6 mm 195 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (Angelbird V60)
56.2 MB/s +75%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (Angelbird V60)
34.6 MB/s +7%
Bigme Hibreak
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (Angelbird V60)
32.2 MB/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 77, n=83, last 2 years)
29.7 MB/s -8%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Bigme Hibreak PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø30.7 (21.8-38)
Onyx Boox Page Adreno 610, SD 662, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.3 (28.9-51.1)
Bigme Hibreak PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø50.2 (25.3-60.1)
Onyx Boox Page Adreno 610, SD 662, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.2 (31.7-81.3)

通信和操作--即使是移动通信也在船上进行

WiFi 5 是 Bigme Hibreak 支持的最快的 Wi-Fi 标准。不出所料,评测设备的传输速度约为 280 - 375 Mbit/s。我们使用参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 进行了测试。这些传输速度也保持相对稳定,只有一次短暂的接收质量下降。

4G 是目前最快的移动网络通信标准。频率范围可以接受,这意味着出国旅行也是可能的。不过,如果您计划进行新的旅行,请尽量提前了解是否可以在当地使用手机。在我们的随机测试中,手机的接收效果相当不错,但在一些困难的情况下,例如发现自己位于高楼之间时,接收质量会出现短暂的下降。

可以通过卫星网络进行导航,而且在我们的短时间随机测试中运行良好。

触摸屏很容易使用,但相对较低的 21fps 最高帧频意味着输入并不总是能在屏幕上立即显示。手机的响应速度通常足够快,即使是快速键盘输入也是如此,但传统的智能手机仍然要精确得多,使用起来也更顺手。

由于没有指纹扫描仪,因此无法进行生物识别。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=188, last 2 years)
716 MBit/s +161%
Onyx Boox Page
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
358 (341min - 374max) MBit/s +31%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (10.5 - 718, n=190)
350 MBit/s +28%
Onyx Boox Palma
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
336 (277min - 361max) MBit/s +23%
Bigme Hibreak
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
274 (226min - 280max) MBit/s
PocketBook Verse Pro Color
802.11 b/g/n
38.9 (22min, 22.87P1 - 48max) MBit/s -86%
Tolino Shine Color
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
23.1 MBit/s -92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=186, last 2 years)
704 MBit/s +101%
Bigme Hibreak
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
351 (235min - 375max) MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (20.1 - 695, n=189)
328 MBit/s -7%
Onyx Boox Palma
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
311 (285min - 338max) MBit/s -11%
Onyx Boox Page
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
288 (161min - 322max) MBit/s -18%
PocketBook Verse Pro Color
802.11 b/g/n
40.2 (30min, 26.29P1 - 47max) MBit/s -89%
Tolino Shine Color
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
27.9 MBit/s -92%
050100150200250300350Tooltip
Bigme Hibreak; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø273 (226-280)
Bigme Hibreak; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø351 (235-375)

软件、电子阅读和可持续性 - 支持应用程序的旧版Android

操作系统基于Android 11,但也适应显示屏的特殊功能:预装了阅读器和便签应用程序,你还可以通过应用程序商店添加其他应用程序。不过,你不应该期待进一步的系统更新--即使是安全补丁也已经有几年的历史了。作为用户,至少可以通过谷歌 Play 服务的更新自动获得基本的安全保护。

我们应该强调的是,2:1 的屏幕格式并不适合阅读文档,因为根据智能手机的握持方式,屏幕上的宽度或高度都会非常有限。在这方面,平板电脑格式的电子阅读器更舒适,也做得更好。除此之外,Hibreak 并没有那么纯粹地以阅读文件为目的,而是试图将自己表现为一款传统的智能手机。Hibreak 的主屏幕也与标准版Android 更为一致,主屏幕上有许多应用程序图标,而不是像其他阅读器那样有一个独立的图书和文档库。

不过,BookShelf 有自己的文档阅读器应用程序,你可以在阅读时进行许多设置:例如,对比度、格式或页面移动。还可以自动滚动。不过,设置的翻译和组织有时比较奇怪。您还可以轻松安装和使用其他阅读器应用程序,而且由于 Hibreak 带有扬声器,因此也非常适合听有声读物。

在可持续发展方面,精简的包装是一个亮点,而且不附带 USB 数据线,这两点可以避免不必要的电子垃圾。除此之外,这款手机采用塑料薄膜包装,在确保可持续发展方面几乎没有做出任何明显的努力:设备既不便于用户打开和维修,也没有任何关于所用材料的信息。

摄像头 - 仅用于紧急情况

前置摄像头图像
前置摄像头图像

从摄像头的设置上也可以看出该公司为提供最全面的智能手机所做的努力:后置和前置摄像头意味着你甚至可以使用电子墨水智能手机进行自拍。当然,电子墨水屏不能像其他类型的屏幕那样提供精确的预览。这意味着真正的效果通常只能在其他显示屏上或打印出来后才能看到。

后置主摄像头分辨率为 1300 万像素,配有 LED 闪光灯。拍摄出来的照片不是特别细致,而且很快就会曝光过度。不过,该摄像头对于记录场景或扫描文件还是很有用的。在弱光环境下,清晰度较差,亮部和暗部的动态范围都较低,这些都是不足之处。

视频最高可录制 30fps 的全高清视频。不过,视频的质量也不是特别高,自动对焦在找到正确的焦距之前经常会出现 "狂抽 "现象。

前置摄像头为 500 万像素自拍摄像头。同样,它拍出的照片动态感不强,难以应对明亮的背景。自拍照的细节看起来相当粗糙,色彩还原也略显失真。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plantMain camera environmentMain camera low light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
5.3 ∆E
11 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
4 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
7 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
10 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Bigme Hibreak: 8.49 ∆E min: 2.81 - max: 14.3 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
54.8 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
28 ∆E
66.2 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
77.9 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Bigme Hibreak: 47.38 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 94.34 ∆E

显示屏 - 比我们想象的更快

显示特写图像
显示特写图像

Bigme Hibreak 的主要特点是其电子墨水显示屏。关于这项显示技术的具体功能,您可以在以下评测中找到更详细的说明 在这篇评论中.简而言之,小墨滴通过电子电荷定位,从而形成图像。其工作原理与 LED 或 OLED 屏幕完全不同。

这种屏幕具有许多优点,例如无闪烁阅读,因为静止图像只需创建一次,随后就会一直存在。此外,它还可以在环境光下阅读,无需任何内部照明。

不过,在彩色显示时,分辨率会下降到三分之一,因为显示一个彩色像素需要三个墨水颗粒。色彩数量有限,色彩细微差别很小,显示的图像看起来更像是用粉彩铅笔画的。

Hibreak 的电子墨水面板的黑白分辨率为 1,440 x 720 像素,相应的彩色分辨率为 480 x 240 像素。更低的色彩分辨率在动态图像中尤为明显。另一方面,文字在 5.84 英寸的屏幕上显得非常清晰,阅读起来非常惬意。

如有需要,还可通过 LED 从侧面照亮屏幕,即使在完全黑暗的环境中也能轻松阅读。如果需要,照明亮度也可以达到 162 cd/m²。在这一点上,Onyx Boox Palma 优势明显,但 Bigme Hibreak 的最大亮度足以满足日常使用。

当然,屏幕的响应时间比传统手机要慢,但与其他电子阅读器相比,我们的评测设备已经取得了显著进步。

162
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 162 cd/m² (Nits)
Center on Battery: 162 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
Bigme Hibreak
E-Ink, 1440x720, 5.8"
Onyx Boox Palma
E-Ink, 1648x824, 6.1"
Onyx Boox Page
E-Ink, 1682x1264, 7"
PocketBook Verse Pro Color
E-Ink, 1448x1072, 6"
Tolino Shine Color
E-Ink Kaleido 3, 1448x1072, 6"
Screen
144%
-13%
-14%
-30%
Brightness middle
162
395
144%
141
-13%
140
-14%
113
-30%
Black Level *
Brightness
400
141
142
110
Brightness Distribution
89
85
89
93
Greyscale dE 2000 *
11.6
Gamma
1.324 166%
CCT
7360 88%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8684 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
128.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 48.4 ms rise
↘ 80.3 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
238.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 38.2 ms rise
↘ 200.1 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

性能、排放和电池寿命--昔日的 SoC

可用的蓝牙音频编解码器
可用的蓝牙音频编解码器

在 SoC 方面,Bigme 选择了 联发科 Helio P35这颗芯片已经过时很久了,你只能在便宜的智能手机上找到它。不过,作为一款电子阅读器,它在性能方面的表现还是不错的,尽管我们的评测设备跟不上 Onyx Boox Palma - 这种芯片能提供更流畅的操作体验。

在使用和操作 Hibreak 时,你必须允许有一点延迟。在滚动浏览大型网站时,加载内容往往需要几秒钟。内存的速度也不是很快,无法为系统提供涡轮增压。

在较长的负载情况下,机箱仅会轻微发热。

Bigme Hibreak 底部边缘的小型扬声器音量不大。但它的声音确实相当合理,没有任何失真。你不要指望它能发出低音或中音,但扬声器非常适合在相当安静的环境中听音乐或播放有声读物。

外部音频设备可通过 USB-C 或蓝牙连接。只有几种编解码器可用于无线播放,但其中也包括 aptX HD 或 LDAC 等高保真变体。

电池容量为 3,300 毫安时,对于一款电子阅读器来说相当强劲,但与 Onyx Boox Palma则可以获得更强劲的电池。在屏幕相对较亮的情况下,Wi-Fi 测试的续航时间为 12 小时 35 分钟;在光线较暗、页面更新相对较少的情况下,我们记录的电子阅读时间为 18 小时 46 分钟。这说明这款手机的续航能力相对较好,甚至可以顺利完成一天的阅读。

这款电子墨水智能手机的最大充电功率为 10 瓦,而且不附带充电器。在我们的测试中,手机可以使用各种充电器,但一个完整的充电周期需要 2 个多小时。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=179, last 2 years)
1482 Points +623%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
330 Points +61%
Bigme Hibreak
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
205 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  ()
205 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=179, last 2 years)
4163 Points +359%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1147 Points +26%
Bigme Hibreak
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
907 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  ()
907 Points 0%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=173, last 2 years)
1040 Points +478%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
307 Points +71%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
275 Points +53%
Bigme Hibreak
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
180 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (150 - 180, n=7)
168.6 Points -6%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=173, last 2 years)
3477 Points +250%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1273 Points +28%
Bigme Hibreak
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
993 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (539 - 1022, n=7)
902 Points -9%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
763 Points -23%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=195, last 2 years)
13255 Points +194%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
5095 Points +13%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (4507 - 5059, n=2)
4783 Points +6%
Bigme Hibreak
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
4507 Points
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
3195 Points -29%
GFXBench
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 53, n=207, last 2 years)
16.1 fps +2339%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
1.1 fps +67%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1.1 fps +67%
Bigme Hibreak
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
0.66 fps
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  ()
0.66 fps 0%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=208, last 2 years)
39.2 fps +700%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7.5 fps +53%
Bigme Hibreak
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
4.9 fps
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
4.8 fps -2%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (2.2 - 4.9, n=12)
4.01 fps -18%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years)
34.4 fps +2050%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
2.9 fps +81%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2.5 fps +56%
Bigme Hibreak
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
1.6 fps
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (1.4 - 1.6, n=12)
1.467 fps -8%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 166, n=207, last 2 years)
50.8 fps +560%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
12 fps +56%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
8.1 fps +5%
Bigme Hibreak
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
7.7 fps
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (3.5 - 7.7, n=13)
6.38 fps -17%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years)
85.9 fps +1898%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
7.8 fps +81%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7.4 fps +72%
Bigme Hibreak
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
4.3 fps
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (3.8 - 4.3, n=13)
3.95 fps -8%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)
4108 Points +385%
Bigme Hibreak
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
847 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (244 - 850, n=13)
651 Points -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)
4641 Points +494%
Bigme Hibreak
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
781 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (205 - 789, n=13)
587 Points -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)
3222 Points +168%
Bigme Hibreak
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
1203 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (722 - 1203, n=13)
1084 Points -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 17553, n=66, last 2 years)
3045 Points +537%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1147 Points +140%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
1131 Points +137%
Bigme Hibreak
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
478 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (178 - 512, n=13)
398 Points -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (370 - 29890, n=66, last 2 years)
3219 Points +691%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1006 Points +147%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
998 Points +145%
Bigme Hibreak
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
407 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (145 - 508, n=13)
357 Points -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (982 - 7180, n=66, last 2 years)
3276 Points +167%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2245 Points +83%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
2113 Points +72%
Bigme Hibreak
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
1225 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (435 - 1238, n=13)
1041 Points -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 23024, n=70, last 2 years)
10753 Points +1028%
Bigme Hibreak
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
953 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (725 - 953, n=13)
837 Points -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (840 - 45492, n=70, last 2 years)
18957 Points +2057%
Bigme Hibreak
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
879 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (695 - 879, n=13)
783 Points -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=70, last 2 years)
4891 Points +262%
Bigme Hibreak
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
1352 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (653 - 1352, n=13)
1115 Points -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (508 - 23762, n=160, last 2 years)
8298 Points +1390%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1175 Points +111%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
740 Points +33%
Bigme Hibreak
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
557 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (478 - 564, n=13)
527 Points -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (453 - 40163, n=160, last 2 years)
12465 Points +2513%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1034 Points +117%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
642 Points +35%
Bigme Hibreak
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
477 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (423 - 489, n=13)
459 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 10632, n=160, last 2 years)
4788 Points +252%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2246 Points +65%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
1588 Points +17%
Bigme Hibreak
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
1359 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (766 - 1359, n=13)
1135 Points -16%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 100368, n=209, last 2 years)
38912 Points +445%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
10205 Points +43%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
9440 Points +32%
Bigme Hibreak
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
7140 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (4347 - 7140, n=6)
5146 Points -28%
PocketBook Verse Pro Color
unknown, unknown, 1024
2794 Points -61%
Tolino Shine Color
MediaTek MTK 8113T, , 512
1755 Points -75%
Bigme HibreakOnyx Boox PalmaOnyx Boox PageAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
243%
110%
93%
970%
Sequential Read 256KB
273.1
509.8
87%
277.1
1%
Sequential Write 256KB
180.1
108.3
-40%
116.6
-35%
Random Read 4KB
67.3
136
102%
65
-3%
Random Write 4KB
13.1
121.1
824%
75.4
476%
Max. Load
 39.5 °C37 °C34.2 °C 
 39.2 °C35.8 °C34.1 °C 
 38.2 °C37.8 °C34.4 °C 
Maximum: 39.5 °C
Average: 36.7 °C
35.4 °C39.7 °C43.1 °C
35.4 °C37.8 °C42.8 °C
35.5 °C37.8 °C40.7 °C
Maximum: 43.1 °C
Average: 38.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.9 °C | Room Temperature 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.6 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
正面热图
正面热图
后方热图
后方热图
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2044.246.22538.738.53137.732.44038.934.95037.237.16325.525.78019.519.910018.719.812520.421.416018.823.520018.130.525015.638.531515.744.940014.749.850016.255.463020.158.780019.161.8100018.363.3125015.363.6160013.566.1200013.665250012.768.231501363.7400012.462500012.562630012.360.2800012.567.41000012.565.61250012.463.51600011.848.2SPL27.176.2N0.935.7median 14.7median 61.8Delta2.610.737.236.930.330.824.126.331.433.137.335.825.931.419.526.516.529.613.726.613.729.99.232.28.337.66.745.1752.18.857.28.362.18.962.510.766.28.765.29.1659.768.110.667.411.364.41269.812.974.913.77314.473.115.364.516631751.923.981.10.546.4median 10.7median 632.710.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseBigme HibreakOnyx Boox Palma
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Bigme Hibreak audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Onyx Boox Palma audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
18h 46min
WiFi Websurfing
12h 35min
Bigme Hibreak
3300 mAh
Onyx Boox Palma
3950 mAh
Onyx Boox Page
2300 mAh
PocketBook Verse Pro Color
2100 mAh
Tolino Shine Color
1500 mAh
Battery Runtime
15%
-21%
-23%
-39%
Reader / Idle
1126
1257
12%
894
-21%
869
-23%
691
-39%
WiFi v1.3
755
894
18%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

回顾:Bigme HiBreak。评测设备由 Bigme 提供。
回顾:Bigme HiBreak。评测设备由 Bigme 提供。

在显示动态图像或色彩方面,Bigme Hibreak 的电子墨水显示屏当然还无法与 LED 或 OLED 显示屏相提并论。但它确实使电子纸屏幕的用途更加广泛。因此,这款智能手机非常适合用作辅助设备或执行特殊任务。它的重量很轻,你可以阅读长篇文字而不会感到疲倦,而且尽管电池容量不大,手机的续航时间也很长。

由于它配备了功能齐全的 4G 调制解调器、充足的内存和Android ,还可以用作电子记事本或导航设备。

Bigme Hibreak - 01/21/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
76%
Keyboard
58 / 75 → 77%
Pointing Device
81%
Connectivity
29 / 69 → 42%
Weight
92%
Battery
89%
Display
78%
Games Performance
2 / 55 → 3%
Application Performance
28 / 85 → 33%
AI Performance
2%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
67 / 90 → 74%
Camera
40%
Average
44%
65%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
10%
Packaging
10%
Power Use
60%
Repairability
6%
Software Updates
0%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 14.3%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Bigme Hibreak 智能手机评测--彩色显示屏电子墨水手机实现高帧率
Florian Schmitt, 2025-01-25 (Update: 2025-01-25)