Notebookcheck Logo

Onyx Boox Palma 评测--配备电子墨水显示屏和摄像头的掌上平板电脑

外形酷似智能手机

Onyx Boox Palma 外型酷似手机,但缺乏移动通信等基本功能。因此,它更像是一个非常方便的电子书阅读器,支持Android 应用程序,甚至还有一个小型摄像头。在我们的测试中了解一下 Palma 的功能。
Android ARM E-Ink Tablet Smartphone
Onyx Boox Palma
Onyx Boox Palma
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Kryo 260
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
Display
6.13 inch 2:1, 1648 x 824 pixel 301 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, E-Ink, Carta 1200, frontlight, glossy: yes
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 2 TByte, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: G-sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 159 x 80
Battery
3950 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix LED flash
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, USB-C cable, card slot tool, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
170 g
Price
300 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Bewertung
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
79.8 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Onyx Boox Palma
SD 662, Adreno 610
170 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.13"1648x824
77.2 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
Onyx Boox Page
SD 662, Adreno 610
195 g32 GB eMMC Flash7.00"1682x1264
75.7 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
PocketBook InkPad Color 3
unknown, unknown
269 g32 GB eMMC Flash7.80"936x702
76.9 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2022
Honor 50 Lite
SD 662, Adreno 610
192 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2376x1080

案例和设备 - 木片外观

Onyx Boox Palma 的屏幕对角线为 6.13 英寸,与目前的智能手机相似。电子墨水屏被安置在一个相当简单的塑料外壳中,背面的图案让人联想到木片壁纸,感觉也很像。背面的摄像头模块有点突出,用手指划过边缘时感觉棱角分明。

圆形的侧面使这款智能手机大小的电子墨水平板电脑在握持时非常符合人体工程学。该设备结构坚固,不惧压力,不过在扭动时会发出轻微的吱吱声。Onyx Boox Palma 重量仅为 170 克,相当轻巧,即使长时间握持也不会让手臂感到疲劳。

128 GB 的大容量存储空间和 6 GB 的运行内存都是不错的配置,比许多大型电子阅读器要多得多。不过,如果你喜欢听音乐,就不得不接受这样一个事实:你只能通过 USB-C 端口或蓝牙 5.0 连接耳机和扬声器,没有专用的 3.5 毫米音频接口。

卡槽不接受 SIM 卡,只能使用 microSD 卡,但最大容量可达 2 TB。在我们使用 Angelbird V60 参考卡进行的测试中,读卡器的速度非常快,在复制测试中达到了 56.2 MByte/s。在 CPDT 基准测试中,该设备的读取速度甚至更快。这意味着您可以放心地将 microSD 卡用作内存扩展,因为它不会拖慢您的速度。

Onyx Boox Palma
Onyx Boox Palma
Onyx Boox Palma
Onyx Boox Palma
Onyx Boox Palma

尺寸比较

189 mm 134 mm 8 mm 269 g161.8 mm 74.7 mm 8.5 mm 192 g159 mm 80 mm 8 mm 170 g156 mm 137 mm 6 mm 195 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Onyx Boox Palma
  (Angelbird V60)
56.2 MB/s
Onyx Boox Page
  (Angelbird V60)
34.6 MB/s -38%
Average of class Tablet
  (7.61 - 101.6, n=59, last 2 years)
34.4 MB/s -39%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Onyx Boox Page Adreno 610, SD 662, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.3 (28.9-51.1)
Onyx Boox Page Adreno 610, SD 662, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.2 (31.7-81.3)

通信、软件和操作 -Android-应用程序支持

WiFi 5 是 Onyx Boox Palma 能够处理的最快 WiFi 标准。这意味着可以达到通常的 300 - 350 Mbit/s。不过,我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器进行的测试表明,传输速率有时会低于 300 MBit/s,而且不像其他设备那样稳定。

尽管 Onyx Boox Palma 外形酷似智能手机,但它没有蜂窝调制解调器,这意味着无法通过移动网络访问移动互联网或拨打电话。

软件基于Android 11,也可以通过预装的 Google Play Store 轻松下载和启动应用程序。不过,需要注意的是,在反应缓慢的黑白电子墨水显示屏上,视频或快节奏游戏等单个应用程序意义不大。

触摸屏使用起来很精确,但你必须习惯屏幕对输入的反应比 IPS 或 OLED 屏幕稍慢这一事实。由于没有前置摄像头,所以没有指纹传感器,也没有生物人脸识别功能。

物理按键位于外壳的左右两侧。它们可用于调节音量、滚动书籍或将系统切换到待机状态。左侧按键可以相对自由地分配;例如,如果上一张图片的某些部分仍然可见,你可以用它来请求刷新屏幕。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Honor 50 Lite
243 (119min - 266max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Honor 50 Lite
226 (180min - 260max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Onyx Boox Page
358 (341min - 374max) MBit/s +7%
Onyx Boox Palma
336 (277min - 361max) MBit/s
PocketBook InkPad Color 3
56.4 MBit/s -83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Onyx Boox Palma
311 (285min - 338max) MBit/s
Onyx Boox Page
288 (161min - 322max) MBit/s -7%
PocketBook InkPad Color 3
64.3 MBit/s -79%

Legend

 
Onyx Boox Palma Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Onyx Boox Page Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
PocketBook InkPad Color 3 unknown, unknown, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 50 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Onyx Boox Palma; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø311 (285-338)
Onyx Boox Palma; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø336 (277-361)

照相机 - 用于扫描文件

制造商没有在 Onyx Palma 上安装照相应用程序,只安装了一个文本扫描应用程序。不过,你可以通过 Google Play 商店轻松安装第三方相机应用程序,以便使用背面的 1600 万像素镜头拍照。

事实证明,如果有必要,还可以使用该设备拍照:这些照片的曝光度也相当不错,但只能显示一些细节。在弱光环境下,可以获得可用的亮度,但清晰度还有待提高。该相机适合扫描文件和记录情况,但真正的摄影爱好者很难满意。

由于没有前置摄像头,所以自拍时最多只能使用后置摄像头,但这样一来就没有图像预览功能了。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low Light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
6.6 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
8 ∆E
9 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Onyx Boox Palma: 6.9 ∆E min: 3.6 - max: 11.16 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.7 ∆E
54.7 ∆E
38.3 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
43.9 ∆E
62.6 ∆E
54.6 ∆E
33.2 ∆E
43.3 ∆E
26.1 ∆E
66.1 ∆E
65.3 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
48.7 ∆E
37 ∆E
77.2 ∆E
43 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
93.8 ∆E
71.1 ∆E
52.1 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
13 ∆E
ColorChecker Onyx Boox Palma: 46.74 ∆E min: 12.99 - max: 93.8 ∆E

电子阅读--应用程序支持,自由选择

预装的阅读软件名为 Neo Reader。它提供丰富的设置选项,还可以使用音量按钮翻页,非常实用。

从显示屏的清晰度、对比度到水印的淡化,阅读体验都可以自定义。此外,还可选配文本转语音功能,至少在阅读英文书籍时效果非常好。它听起来并不像天生的阅读器,但能清晰地再现文字;你可以在 Play Store 中找到更多悦耳的解决方案。

说到 Play Store,你当然也可以下载并安装自己喜欢的阅读软件,如 Tolino 或 Kindle。它们在 Onyx Boox Palma 上的运行没有任何问题。预装的 Onyx 商店只提供开源的免费书籍,至少在欧洲是这样。

显示屏 - Onyx Boox Palma 上的明亮灯光

特写展示
特写展示

Onyx Boox Palma 采用 6.13 英寸 2:1 显示屏,分辨率为 1,648 x 824 像素。由于采用了 E-Ink 技术,相对较小的显示屏上的图像也足够清晰,对比度也非常高。

这种显示屏名为 E-Ink Carta 1200,响应速度稍快,每秒可显示更多图像,但仍不适合视频或快速游戏。此外,它还只支持 16 级灰度,对于文本来说完全足够,但在显示色彩细微差别时会有明显的层次感,图像或视频的细节也会减少。

为了在黑暗中阅读,Onyx Boox Palma 为屏幕提供了背光,在我们使用分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行的测试中,对于一款电子墨水平板电脑来说,背光的亮度可达 414 cd/m²。

由于设置完成后无需刷新图像,因此屏幕不会闪烁。直接电源也可防止照明时闪烁。不过,至少半秒的响应时间也相当慢,这意味着只有在延迟的情况下才能接受输入。

430
cd/m²
381
cd/m²
398
cd/m²
411
cd/m²
395
cd/m²
388
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 430 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 400.1 cd/m² Minimum: 0.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 395 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Greyscale 11.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 1.324
Onyx Boox Palma
E-Ink, 1648x824, 6.1"
Onyx Boox Page
E-Ink, 1682x1264, 7"
PocketBook InkPad Color 3
E-Ink, 936x702, 7.8"
Honor 50 Lite
TFT-LCD, 2376x1080, 6.7"
Response Times
-59%
67%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
107.8 ?(66.9, 50.9)
120 ?(47, 73)
-11%
40 ?(18, 22)
63%
Response Time Black / White *
56.3 ?(35, 21.3)
116 ?(49, 67)
-106%
16.8 ?(5.2, 11.6)
70%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-44%
-57%
28%
Brightness middle
395
141
-64%
75
-81%
477
21%
Brightness
400
141
-65%
77
-81%
456
14%
Brightness Distribution
89
85
-4%
81
-9%
92
3%
Black Level *
0.41
Greyscale dE 2000 *
11.6
3.2
72%
Gamma
1.324 166%
2.14 103%
CCT
7360 88%
6525 100%
Contrast
1163
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.9
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-52% / -50%
-57% / -57%
48% / 41%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
56.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 35 ms rise
↘ 21.3 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
107.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 66.9 ms rise
↘ 50.9 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 良好的动力和续航能力

稍显老旧的 高通骁龙 662系统芯片。它通常足以保证系统的流畅运行,但在我们的基准测试中无法获得较高的总分。因此,您应该避免在这款电子墨水平板电脑上使用非常复杂的应用程序,但如果您只想阅读文档和电子书,那么高达 2 GHz 的八核处理器就能提供足够的动力,让您获得流畅的体验。

UFS 2.1 内存的速度足以避免过长的等待时间,并能合理快速地处理数据传输。与廉价的电子阅读器相比,其差异尤为明显。

Onyx Boox Palma 只有在长时间负载的情况下才会偶尔发热到 40 °C以上。在这一点上你可以感觉到,但绝不会感到不舒服。在 3DMark 压力测试中,我们也没有发现任何性能节流现象。

扬声器位于底部边缘,不过屏幕上方也有一个类似耳机的切口,但听不到声音。不过,听筒也可以使用,例如通过 Skype 等互联网服务进行通话。

因此,这是一个用于媒体声音的单声道扬声器,最高音量超过 81 dB(A),声音相当响亮。不过,你不应该期待过多的中低频,甚至低频,因此声音有点偏高音,这对语音和人声的清晰度来说还不算太坏。

不过,如果你想要真正的好声音输出,就应该通过 USB-C 端口或蓝牙连接耳机或扬声器。这样做不会出现任何问题,而且声音会更加饱满。

Onyx Boox Palma 安装有 3,950 毫安时电池。对于这个价位的电子墨水平板电脑来说,这是一个非常不错的容量,而且这款小巧的设备也达到了不错的数值:在背光最小的情况下,您可以浏览文档和书籍近 21 个小时,然后才需要插入电源。在亮度为 150 cd/m² 的情况下,也只有不到 15 个小时。

这款小型电子墨水平板电脑的最大充电功率为 10 瓦,因此电池再次充满电需要 3 个多小时。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)
707 Points +130%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (275 - 316, n=13)
308 Points 0%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
307 Points
Honor 50 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
306 Points 0%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
275 Points -10%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)
2494 Points +96%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (763 - 1453, n=13)
1299 Points +2%
Honor 50 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1285 Points +1%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1273 Points
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
763 Points -40%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=70, last 2 years)
1111 Points +237%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (330 - 333, n=2)
332 Points +1%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
330 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=70, last 2 years)
3544 Points +209%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1147 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1111 - 1147, n=2)
1129 Points -2%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)
9847 Points +93%
Honor 50 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
6052 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (3195 - 7554, n=6)
5608 Points +10%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
5095 Points
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
3195 Points -37%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Tablet
  (361 - 14235, n=46, last 2 years)
2067 Points +80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1106 - 1905, n=12)
1220 Points +6%
Honor 50 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1164 Points +1%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1147 Points
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
1131 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Tablet
  (290 - 24605, n=46, last 2 years)
2198 Points +118%
Honor 50 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1021 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (974 - 1074, n=12)
1017 Points +1%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1006 Points
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
998 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average of class Tablet
  (858 - 5751, n=46, last 2 years)
2797 Points +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2108 - 2513, n=12)
2368 Points +5%
Honor 50 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2280 Points +2%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2245 Points
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
2113 Points -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet
  (267 - 17674, n=66, last 2 years)
4499 Points +283%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1175 Points
Honor 50 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1153 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (740 - 1197, n=12)
1135 Points -3%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
740 Points -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet
  (240 - 29325, n=66, last 2 years)
5876 Points +468%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1034 Points
Honor 50 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1025 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (642 - 1081, n=12)
999 Points -3%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
642 Points -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet
  (441 - 7451, n=66, last 2 years)
3632 Points +62%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2246 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1588 - 2534, n=12)
2240 Points 0%
Honor 50 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2053 Points -9%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
1588 Points -29%
Wild Life Score
Average of class Tablet
  (286 - 7933, n=60, last 2 years)
1748 Points +347%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
391 Points
Honor 50 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
383 Points -2%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
381 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (369 - 391, n=11)
378 Points -3%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet
  (289 - 32525, n=73, last 2 years)
4720 Points +1183%
Honor 50 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
382 Points +4%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
376 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (366 - 382, n=8)
370 Points +1%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
368 Points
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Tablet
  (75 - 8689, n=74, last 2 years)
1334 Points +1102%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
111 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (102 - 111, n=5)
107 Points -4%
Honor 50 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
106 Points -5%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Tablet
  (72 - 8889, n=73, last 2 years)
1564 Points +1464%
Honor 50 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
107 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (100 - 107, n=4)
102.5 Points +3%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
100 Points
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (3 - 120, n=79, last 2 years)
27.4 fps +128%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
12 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (4.8 - 15, n=13)
10.5 fps -12%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
8.1 fps -32%
Honor 50 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7.1 fps -41%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (2.5 - 340, n=79, last 2 years)
55.9 fps +655%
Honor 50 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
8.4 fps +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (7.4 - 8.6, n=13)
8.27 fps +12%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
7.8 fps +5%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7.4 fps
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (1.9 - 106.4, n=79, last 2 years)
19 fps +153%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7.5 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2.9 - 9.6, n=13)
6.43 fps -14%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
4.8 fps -36%
Honor 50 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
4.2 fps -44%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (0.9 - 114.5, n=79, last 2 years)
21.3 fps +752%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
2.9 fps +16%
Honor 50 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2.8 fps +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2.5 - 2.9, n=13)
2.78 fps +11%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2.5 fps
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (0.4 - 55.1, n=77, last 2 years)
10 fps +809%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1.1 - 1.2, n=3)
1.133 fps +3%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
1.1 fps 0%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1.1 fps
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet
  (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)
29371 Points +188%
Honor 50 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
10247 Points 0%
Onyx Boox Palma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
10205 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (8893 - 10247, n=14)
9495 Points -7%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
9440 Points -7%
PocketBook InkPad Color 3
unknown, unknown, 1024
2672 Points -74%
Onyx Boox PalmaOnyx Boox PageHonor 50 LiteAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-32%
15%
61%
184%
Sequential Read 256KB
509.8
277.1
-46%
492.5
-3%
Sequential Write 256KB
108.3
116.6
8%
184.6
70%
Random Read 4KB
136
65
-52%
129.7
-5%
152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113)
12%
Random Write 4KB
121.1
75.4
-38%
117.7
-3%

温度

Max. Load
 34.8 °C28.2 °C28 °C 
 36.6 °C27.1 °C29.1 °C 
 36.2 °C28.2 °C28.4 °C 
Maximum: 36.6 °C
Average: 30.7 °C
26.9 °C28.2 °C36.4 °C
26.8 °C28.8 °C27 °C
27 °C28.5 °C40.8 °C
Maximum: 40.8 °C
Average: 30 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.2 °C | Room Temperature 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.


正面热图
正面热图
热图返回
热图返回

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

00.10.20.40.50.60.70.80.91.11.21.31.41.51.61.81.922.12.2Tooltip
Onyx Boox Palma Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.668 (0.638-0.682)
Honor 50 Lite Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø0.635 (0.621-0.65)
Onyx Boox Palma Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.33 (2.32-2.34)
Onyx Boox Page Adreno 610, SD 662, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.3 (2.28-2.3)
Honor 50 Lite Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø2.3 (2.3-2.3)

发言人

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.236.92530.330.83124.126.34031.433.15037.335.86325.931.48019.526.510016.529.612513.726.616013.729.92009.232.22508.337.63156.745.1400752.15008.857.26308.362.18008.962.5100010.766.212508.765.216009.16520009.768.1250010.667.4315011.364.440001269.8500012.974.9630013.773800014.473.11000015.364.5125001663160001751.9SPL23.981.1N0.546.4median 10.7median 63Delta2.710.635.938.226.427.923.721.626.924.131.731.423.228.121.222.91825.513.930.816.140.211.746.212.249.79.349.69.155.59.264.19.768.610.671.810.976.711.976.71277.712.681.312.780.512.174.112.679.913.376.913.273.513.674.413.775.313.663.913.655.124.489.10.574.4median 12.6median 73.51.611.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnyx Boox PalmaHonor 50 Lite
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Onyx Boox Palma audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Honor 50 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Onyx Boox Palma
3950 mAh
894 min
Average of class Tablet
  (319 - 1764, n=79, last 2 years)
822 min -8%
Honor 50 Lite
4300 mAh
767 min -14%
Battery Runtime - Reader / Idle
Average of class Tablet
  (691 - 5003, n=63, last 2 years)
1834 min +46%
Onyx Boox Palma
3950 mAh
1257 min
Onyx Boox Page
2300 mAh
894 min
PocketBook InkPad Color 3
2900 mAh
944 min
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
20h 57min
WiFi Websurfing
14h 54min

Pros

+ 便捷设计
+ Android-支持应用程序
+ 明亮的显示照明
+ 内存充裕
+ 快速 microSD 插槽
+ 运行时间长
+ 可自由分配的物理按钮

Cons

- 边缘锐利的摄像头模块
- 无生物识别解锁功能
- 充电速度慢
- 价格相对昂贵

评价:非常小巧的电子阅读器,具有一定的品质

回顾Onyx Boox Palma。测试设备由
回顾Onyx Boox Palma。测试设备由
KEX GmbH

Onyx Boox Palma 是一款非常方便的非凡电子阅读平板电脑。它不支持手机功能,因此不能指望它能像真正的智能手机一样使用电子墨水显示屏。不过,它的显示屏亮度很高,外壳发热很小,基于Android 的系统可以方便地安装第三方应用程序。

智能手机格式的 E-Ink 平板电脑内存充足,必要时甚至可以使用 microSD 卡进行扩展。物理按键让滚动变得更容易,甚至还有一个相对自由的可分配按键,这也是一个不错的收获。

制造商本可以在外壳上多花点心思:它由暗淡的塑料制成,棱角分明的摄像头模块边缘锋利得令人不快。尽管如此,Palma 仍然相当轻巧坚固。包装盒里没有充电器,相机更多的作用是扫描文件,而不是拍摄真正的好照片。不过,制造商并没有透露其他信息。

Onyx Boox Palma 是一款非常方便的手机格式电子阅读器。这款电子墨水平板电脑支持Android 应用程序,内存充足,性能良好,电池容量大。

对于那些觉得显示屏太小不适合阅读的用户,Onyx Boox 提供了 页码 - 7 英寸电子墨水平板电脑,显示屏略微方正。价格相近的 PocketBook InkPad Color 3甚至还有彩色屏幕,但没有应用程序支持。

价格和供应情况

您可以从我们的租赁合作伙伴KEX Tech在线商店只需不到 300 欧元。该产品也可在eBay 上购买。上有售,但价格为 310 欧元。

您需要在amazon.de 多花几欧元,因为 Onyx Boox Palma 目前只能从美国进口。

Onyx Boox Palma - 01/24/2024 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
79 / 98 → 81%
Keyboard
64 / 80 → 79%
Pointing Device
81%
Connectivity
34 / 70 → 48%
Weight
91 / 40-88 → 100%
Battery
91%
Display
85%
Games Performance
11 / 78 → 14%
Application Performance
41 / 92 → 45%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
54 / 91 → 59%
Camera
43 / 85 → 51%
Average
67%
80%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Onyx Boox Palma 评测--配备电子墨水显示屏和摄像头的掌上平板电脑
Florian Schmitt, 2024-01-28 (Update: 2024-01-28)