中兴 Blade A510 智能手机简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 |
|
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 528 cd/m²
Contrast: 852:1 (Black: 0.62 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 5.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 1.99
ZTE Blade A510 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | ZTE Blade V7 Lite IPS, 1280x720, 5" | TP-Link Neffos C5 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Ulefone Metal IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Archos 50 Platinum 4G IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Blackview A8 Max IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Huawei Y5 II IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Google Pixel XL 2016 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -11% | -14% | -29% | -19% | -29% | -35% | -1% | |
Brightness middle | 528 | 312 -41% | 508 -4% | 312 -41% | 344 -35% | 435 -18% | 465 -12% | 402 -24% |
Brightness | 524 | 302 -42% | 491 -6% | 315 -40% | 349 -33% | 407 -22% | 443 -15% | 408 -22% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 79 -16% | 89 -5% | 87 -7% | 89 -5% | 86 -9% | 90 -4% | 85 -10% |
Black Level * | 0.62 | 0.15 76% | 0.58 6% | 0.56 10% | 0.65 -5% | 1.08 -74% | 0.84 -35% | |
Contrast | 852 | 2080 144% | 876 3% | 557 -35% | 529 -38% | 403 -53% | 554 -35% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 8.2 -58% | 7 -35% | 6.8 -31% | 5.8 -12% | 5.7 -10% | 7.8 -50% | 4 23% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.7 | 16.5 -90% | 14.1 -62% | 14 -61% | 10.7 -23% | 12.3 -41% | 15.7 -80% | 10.1 -16% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.7 | 9.2 -61% | 6.1 -7% | 7.1 -25% | 5.7 -0% | 5.9 -4% | 8.4 -47% | 3.2 44% |
Gamma | 1.99 111% | 2.29 96% | 2.15 102% | 2.77 79% | 2.1 105% | 2.18 101% | 2.07 106% | 2.19 100% |
CCT | 6631 98% | 9017 72% | 8068 81% | 7402 88% | 7792 83% | 8164 80% | 8438 77% | 7037 92% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
↘ 30 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
636 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 476 ms rise | |
↘ 160 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
AndroBench 3-5 | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 |
BaseMark OS II | |
Overall (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
System (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Memory (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Graphics (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Web (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 |
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
ZTE Blade A510 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | very high mids - on average 15.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (45.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 8.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.05 / 0.11 Watt |
Idle | 0.61 / 1.75 / 1.83 Watt |
Load |
4.49 / 5.14 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
ZTE Blade A510 2200 mAh | ZTE Blade V7 Lite 2500 mAh | TP-Link Neffos C5 2200 mAh | Ulefone Metal 3050 mAh | Archos 50 Platinum 4G 2200 mAh | Blackview A8 Max 3000 mAh | Huawei Y5 II 2200 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 20% | -18% | -56% | 6% | -11% | 13% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.61 | 0.63 -3% | 0.72 -18% | 1.41 -131% | 0.59 3% | 0.74 -21% | 0.54 11% |
Idle Average * | 1.75 | 1.37 22% | 1.87 -7% | 2.46 -41% | 1.68 4% | 1.97 -13% | 1.58 10% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.83 | 1.71 7% | 2 -9% | 2.83 -55% | 1.79 2% | 2.09 -14% | 1.7 7% |
Load Average * | 4.49 | 2.82 37% | 5.99 -33% | 5.15 -15% | 4.22 6% | 4.89 -9% | 2.98 34% |
Load Maximum * | 5.14 | 3.36 35% | 6.45 -25% | 7.05 -37% | 4.26 17% | 5.09 1% | 4.98 3% |
* ... smaller is better
ZTE Blade A510 2200 mAh | ZTE Blade V7 Lite 2500 mAh | TP-Link Neffos C5 2200 mAh | Ulefone Metal 3050 mAh | Archos 50 Platinum 4G 2200 mAh | Blackview A8 Max 3000 mAh | Huawei Y5 II 2200 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | |||||||
WiFi v1.3 | 416 | 517 24% | 453 9% | 403 -3% | 384 -8% | 506 22% | 503 21% |
Pros
Cons
来自中国生产商中兴的Blade A510毋庸置疑是一台性价比十分优秀的入门级智能手机。它的IPS屏幕明亮且均匀,在这个价位上对比度也十分优秀。在我们的测试中它的色彩还原能力也可以让人满意。另外,中兴的这台设备通话音质优秀,相机模组表现也在同价位设备中属于佼佼者。它的电池续航也可以令人满意。
十分不错的Blade A510唯一的弱点是性能上的不足,它可能会实现不错的销售额。
Blade A510的最大一个弱点是较低的系统性能,这也是我们不能完全向消费者推荐这台设备的原因所在。这块MediaTek芯片的低性能搭配1GB工作内存,和缓慢的eMMC闪存让它的系统运行时常缓慢不堪,加载应用的等待时间也相对过长。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
ZTE Blade A510
-
03/06/2017 v6 (old)
Marcus Herbrich