微星 CX72-7QLi581 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: MSI CX72-7QLi581
Brand: MSI

全方位。 CX72是一台注定会一直坐在家里或办公室桌面上的17.3寸笔记本电脑。它的发热和噪音都控制在了很低的程度，它搭配强劲的Kaby Lake处理器，但屏幕表现不尽人意。请阅读我们的详尽评测了解更多。

Sascha Mölck, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 12/03/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Geforce Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of notebook.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

MSI CX72-7QLi581 (CX72 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 1176 MHz, RAM: 1001 MHz, DDR3, 64 位界面, ForceWare 375.95, Optimus

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4 2400, 单通道, 两个内存槽 (一个已占用)

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 1600 x 900 pixel 106 PPI, LG Philips LP173WD1-TLF1, TN LED, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH

Storage

WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0, 1024 GB

, 5400 rpm, 874 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek ALC892 @ Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 麦克风接口，耳机接口, Card Reader: SD, TPM 2.0

Networking

Qualcomm Atheros AR8171/8175 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Optical drive

HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 37 x 420 x 287

Battery

41 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 高清

Additional features

Speakers: 4个扬声器, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: no, Cyberlink PowerDVD 12, Magix Music Maker Silver, Magix Photo Manager 15, McAfee LiveSafe (试用版), MS Office 365 (试用版), Winzip (试用版), 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.8 kg, Power Supply: 362 g

Price

799 Euro

Links

MSI homepage
MSI notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA	40.3 MB/s +74%
Asus F756UX-T7013T	27.2 MB/s +17%
MSI CX72-7QLi581	23.2 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE	14.3 MB/s -38%
Acer TravelMate P278-MG-76L2	14 MB/s -40%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA	80.5 MB/s +205%
Asus F756UX-T7013T	38.6 MB/s +46%
Acer TravelMate P278-MG-76L2	27.3 MB/s +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE	26.7 MB/s +1%
MSI CX72-7QLi581	26.4 MB/s

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (seb)	331 MBit/s +57%
MSI CX72-7QLi581 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (jseb)	211 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (seb)	327 MBit/s 0%
MSI CX72-7QLi581 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (jseb)	326 MBit/s


231 cd/m²	252 cd/m²	286 cd/m²
239 cd/m²	268 cd/m²	301 cd/m²
234 cd/m²	253 cd/m²	296 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LG Philips LP173WD1-TLF1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 301 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 262.2 cd/m² Minimum: 5.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 77 %
Center on Battery: 268 cd/m²
Contrast: 273:1 (Black: 0.98 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.26 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 12.45 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
71% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
46% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
52% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
53% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.03

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	MSI CX72-7QLi581 TN LED, 1600x900, 17.3"	Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Asus F756UX-T7013T TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Acer TravelMate P278-MG-76L2 TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE TN LED, 1600x900, 17.3"
Display		34%	26%	29%	3%
Display P3 Coverage	53	72.3 36%	63.9 21%	68.8 30%	52.4 -1%
sRGB Coverage	70.8	94.8 34%	93.7 32%	90.6 28%	76.1 7%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	52	69.3 33%	64.6 24%	66.3 28%	54.2 4%
Response Times		637%	639%	638%	3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	43 ?(22, 21)	43 ?(23, 20) -0%	42 ?(20, 22) 2%	41 ?(21, 20) 5%	42 ?(22, 30) 2%
Response Time Black / White *	25 ?(7, 18)	22 ?(5, 17) 12%	21 ?(6, 15) 16%	23 ?(6, 17) 8%	24 ?(7, 17) 4%
PWM Frequency	50 ?(50)	1000 ?(90) 1900%	1000 ?(90) 1900%	1000 ?(90) 1900%
Screen		46%	73%	35%	12%
Brightness middle	268	320 19%	268 0%	362 35%	205 -24%
Brightness	262	302 15%	255 -3%	344 31%	182 -31%
Brightness Distribution	77	86 12%	83 8%	84 9%	77 0%
Black Level *	0.98	0.4 59%	0.17 83%	0.57 42%	0.43 56%
Contrast	273	800 193%	1576 477%	635 133%	477 75%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	11.26	7.78 31%	7.18 36%	9.54 15%	9.75 13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	17.88	12.74 29%	11.67 35%	16.11 10%	16.02 10%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	12.45	8.87 29%	7.97 36%	10.39 17%	12.09 3%
Gamma	2.03 ^108%	2.27 ^97%	2.34 ^94%	2.55 ^86%	2.62 ^84%
CCT	12273 ^53%	8979 ^72%	8541 ^76%	11093 ^59%	12875 ^50%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	46	62 35%	59 28%	59 28%	49 7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	71	95 34%	94 32%	90 27%	76 7%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		239% / 154%	246% / 170%	234% / 147%	6% / 9%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

50 Hz

≤ 50 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22 ms rise
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5011

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

11481

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6732

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

129 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

332 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

67.2 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Help

... in comparison

Cinebench R15 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.0 | JetStream 1.1

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Intel Core i7-6500U	131 Points +2%
Acer TravelMate P278-MG-76L2 Intel Core i7-6500U	130 Points +1%
MSI CX72-7QLi581 Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Intel Core i5-6200U	118 Points -9%
Asus F756UX-T7013T Intel Core i5-6200U	116 Points -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI CX72-7QLi581 Intel Core i5-7200U	332 Points
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Intel Core i7-6500U	330 Points -1%
Acer TravelMate P278-MG-76L2 Intel Core i7-6500U	329 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Intel Core i5-6200U	292 Points -12%
Asus F756UX-T7013T Intel Core i5-6200U	289 Points -13%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Intel Core i7-6500U	3266 Points +11%
MSI CX72-7QLi581 Intel Core i5-7200U	2941 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Intel Core i5-6200U	2396 Points -19%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Intel Core i7-6500U	6847 Points +5%
MSI CX72-7QLi581 Intel Core i5-7200U	6537 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Intel Core i5-6200U	5569 Points -15%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
MSI CX72-7QLi581 Intel Core i5-7200U	3678 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
MSI CX72-7QLi581 Intel Core i5-7200U	7012 Points

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Intel Core i7-6500U	216.8 Points +2%
MSI CX72-7QLi581 Intel Core i5-7200U	213 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Intel Core i5-6200U	192.6 Points -10%
Acer TravelMate P278-MG-76L2 Intel Core i7-6500U	190.9 Points -10%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3586 points
Help

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256	3734 Points +4%
MSI CX72-7QLi581 GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	3586 Points
Acer TravelMate P278-MG-76L2 GeForce 940M, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256	3502 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Radeon R5 M330, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	3184 Points -11%
Asus F756UX-T7013T GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	3162 Points -12%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0

Transfer Rate Minimum: 44.5 MB/s

Transfer Rate Maximum: 119 MB/s

Transfer Rate Average: 87.6 MB/s

Access Time: 16.6 ms

Burst Rate: 219.7 MB/s

CPU Usage: 2.2 %

	MSI CX72-7QLi581 WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Lite-On CV1-8B256	Asus F756UX-T7013T HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	Acer TravelMate P278-MG-76L2 Lite-On CV1-8B256	Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Toshiba MQ01ABD100
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		9146%	-6%	7900%	-17%
Read Seq	102.8	520 406%	105.8 3%	473 360%	100.6 -2%
Write Seq	100.2	332.8 232%	105 5%	366.3 266%	96.3 -4%
Read 512	34.83	382.8 999%	33.33 -4%	329.4 846%	28.15 -19%
Write 512	46.87	357.7 663%	39.12 -17%	357.3 662%	43.34 -8%
Read 4k	0.422	32.31 7556%	0.413 -2%	30.83 7206%	0.312 -26%
Write 4k	1.063	85.1 7906%	0.947 -11%	74.8 6937%	0.792 -25%
Read 4k QD32	0.918	277.7 30151%	0.812 -12%	245.1 26599%	0.708 -23%
Write 4k QD32	1.064	269.8 25257%	0.968 -9%	217.3 20323%	0.764 -28%

3DMark 11 Performance		2508 points
Help

... in comparison

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus F756UX-T7013T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U	4083 Points +71%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U	2813 Points +18%
MSI CX72-7QLi581 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U	2387 Points
Acer TravelMate P278-MG-76L2 NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i7-6500U	2376 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE AMD Radeon R5 M330, Intel Core i5-6200U	1518 Points -36%

	low	med.	high
BioShock Infinite (2013)	99.9	53.8	45
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016)	37.6	34.4	17.8
Dishonored 2 (2016)	18	14.7

Noise Level

Idle		30.9 / 30.9 / 30.9 dB(A)
HDD		31.4 dB(A)
DVD		36.3 / dB(A)
Load		34 / 34.2 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


34.8 °C	40.1 °C	26.8 °C
32.7 °C	39 °C	26.5 °C
28.2 °C	31.7 °C	23.4 °C

Maximum: 40.1 °C
Average: 31.5 °C


23.6 °C	25.1 °C	36.6 °C
23 °C	24.5 °C	30.4 °C
22.8 °C	23.4 °C	30.2 °C

Maximum: 36.6 °C
Average: 26.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 59.6 °C | Room Temperature 20.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.7 °C / 89.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.9 °C / -5.3 F).

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.4 / 0.5 Watt
Idle	6.6 / 11 / 11.6 Watt
Load	54 / 61 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)		4h 38min

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE 6200U, Radeon R5 M330, 41 Wh	406 min +46%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA 6500U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh	322 min +16%
Acer TravelMate P278-MG-76L2 6500U, GeForce 940M, 37 Wh	297 min +7%
MSI CX72-7QLi581 i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh	278 min
Asus F756UX-T7013T 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 38 Wh	217 min -22%

Pros

+ 磨砂屏幕

+ 大量存储空间

+ 可用M.2插槽

+ USB-C

Cons

- 屏幕亮度和对比度均较低

In review: MSI CX72-7QLi581. Test model provided by Notebook.de.

微星CX72-7QLi581是一台为家庭办公用途设计的笔记本电脑。它提供了足以应对日常用途和简单游戏的性能，在运行中也十分安静，不会变得很烫。另外，这台笔记本电脑搭配了1TB硬盘，并可以通过M.2 2280插槽增加一块固态硬盘。由于底盖上设计有维护窗口，升级所需的操作也十分简单。它的键盘可以出色地满足家庭使用需要，电池续航也还不错。我们不太满意的是它的HD+屏幕，它的亮度和对比度都较低。