Cubot KingKong Mini 3评测 - 具有可靠品质的紧凑型智能手机
潜在的竞争对手比较
rating | date | model | weight | drive | size | resolution | price from |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75.4 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | Cubot KingKong Mini 3 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 149 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 4.50" | 1170x480 | |
| 86.1 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15, A15 GPU 5-Core | 144 g | 64 GB SSD | 4.70" | 1334x750 | |
| 73.5 % v7 (old) | Cubot King Kong Mini 2 Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300 | 123 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 4.00" | 1080x540 | ||
| 74.3 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2021 | Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1 | 172 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 5.30" | 1480x720 |
外壳和功能 - 无IP认证
Cubot KingKong Mini 3的屏幕对角线只有4.5英寸，是目前市场上最小的智能手机之一。然而，由于它也是一款户外手机，对于屏幕尺寸来说，机身并不是非常紧凑，尤其是13.4毫米的外壳厚度显然高于标准。尽管如此，它还是很适合放在口袋里，而且还通过红色的点缀带来一些色彩。
带有金属嵌件的橡胶框架，可见的螺丝，以及光亮的背面也给手机带来了某种风格。它的手感很好，也比较轻，只有149克。外壳看起来非常坚固，应该可以抵御水和灰尘，但制造商没有说明IP认证，所以什么也不知道。在我们的测试中，在清水中浸泡5分钟并没有以任何方式影响手机的功能。
与前代产品Cubot KingKong Mini 2相比，制造商现在提供了更多的存储空间。6GB内存和128GB大容量存储属于中档水平。然而，价格也大幅增加：前代产品从制造商那里只需不到120欧元，而你必须多付110欧元，这几乎是两倍的价格。
作为回报，现在也有了NFC，但你必须没有microSD阅读器。
通信、软件和操作 - 少数的4G频率
此外，Cubot KingKong Mini 3只是一款4G手机，支持的频率相当少，所以在进一步旅行时，你可能会遇到当地蜂窝网络的问题。另一方面，Wi-Fi 5模块在我们与参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000的测试中表现良好，并提供约300 - 350 Mbps的稳定传输速率。
Cubot安装了一个相当纯粹的Android 12，没有额外的预装应用程序。安全补丁是2022年12月的，因此在测试时仍然是相当最新的。然而，目前还没有关于KingKong Mini 3将获得多长时间更新的信息。只有12个月的短暂保修期有点让人讨厌。
Cubot手机没有指纹传感器。该手机只能通过面部识别进行生物解锁。这在光线良好的情况下效果很好，但由于是纯软件解决方案，没有额外的传感器，所以有些不安全。60赫兹的屏幕可以可靠地操作，但你应该记住，4.5英寸屏幕上的按钮非常小。作为回报，即使是小手，你也可以轻松地接触到整个屏幕表面。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 | |
| Cubot King Kong Mini 2 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Cubot King Kong Mini 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2022 | |
| Cubot KingKong Mini 3 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2022 | |
| Cubot KingKong Mini 3 | |
照相机--前景黯淡
索尼的IMX350最大分辨率为2000万像素，被用作背面的主摄像头的照片传感器。即使在光线良好的情况下，照片也经常看起来被洗掉，但至少显示了一定的细节。
在非常低的光线和高对比度的情况下，图片只在光线最强的地方成功，否则就会出现黑暗。在我们的实验室里，在1勒克斯的光照强度下，图片中没有任何东西可以被识别。
视频可以以最大的1080p和30帧的速度录制。同样，图片有点暗，所以需要良好的照明条件。你经常要手动调整焦距，因为它没有反应或反应不充分。
前面有一个500万像素的自拍摄像头，但它只能拍摄亮度较差的照片，即使在平均光线条件下也非常嘈杂。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
显示屏--Cubot手机的光明面
显示屏的分辨率很低：1170 x 480像素，即使对这样一个小屏幕来说也只够用。至少最大亮度为624cd/m2，平均来说非常高。因此，Cubot KingKong Mini 3也可以在较亮的环境中使用。
然而，亮度分布是相当不均匀的，所以当你仔细观察时，你可以看到个别图像区域的差异。黑色水平以及由此产生的对比度也不是最佳的，图像表现看起来有点暗淡。
我们注意到在明亮的灰阶中有明显的蓝色偏移。该显示器没有使用PWM来降低亮度。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 639 cd/m²
Contrast: 1065:1 (Black: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.98 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
81.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.223
| Cubot KingKong Mini 3 IPS, 1170x480, 4.5" | Apple iPhone SE 2022 Retina HD, IPS, 1334x750, 4.7" | Cubot King Kong Mini 2 IPS, 1080x540, 4" | Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 PLS, 1480x720, 5.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -3% | 5% | -36% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44.6 ? | 56 ? -26% | 46 ? -3% | 60 ? -35% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 25 ? | 20 ? 20% | 22 ? 12% | 34 ? -36% |
| PWM Frequency | 354.6 ? | |||
| Screen | 35% | -15% | -16% | |
| Brightness middle | 639 | 662 4% | 624 -2% | 525 -18% |
| Brightness | 624 | 647 4% | 633 1% | 491 -21% |
| Brightness Distribution | 82 | 92 12% | 90 10% | 87 6% |
| Black Level * | 0.6 | 0.4 33% | 0.87 -45% | 0.53 12% |
| Contrast | 1065 | 1655 55% | 717 -33% | 991 -7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.98 | 1.44 71% | 5.21 -5% | 5.54 -11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.55 | 4.74 45% | 10.59 -24% | 10.23 -20% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4 | 1.7 57% | 4.8 -20% | 6.7 -68% |
| Gamma | 2.223 99% | 2.179 101% | 2.585 85% | 2.318 95% |
| CCT | 6873 95% | 6746 96% | 6953 93% | 8555 76% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 16% /
28% | -5% /
-11% | -26% /
-20% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 44.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命--紧凑格式下的中端动力
有了 Helio G85制造商选择了一个已经有三年历史的中端SoC，但仍然相当强大。因此，这款手机提供的功率大大超过了，比如说 三星Galaxy XCover 5尤其是比前代产品更强大。在日常使用中，它在浏览菜单时几乎没有抖动，即使是比较复杂的应用程序也能相当流畅地显示。
存储器提供了典型的慢速eMMC闪存的传输速率。这是一个遗憾，Cubot当然可以在系统中实现更多的感知速度，因为加载和数据传输需要相当长的时间。
外壳上的最高温度为39.4°C，这一点很明显，但仍在限度之内。此外，它并不影响SoC的长期性能，正如3DMark的压力测试向我们展示的那样。
这款手机的听筒也作为扬声器使用，这有助于将声音引向用户。扬声器可以变得相当响亮，但随后听起来相当紧张，高音很重。如果你把音量调低一点，声音就会变得更加平衡，你肯定能听完一段音乐。
然而，真正好的音质是通过耳机或外部扬声器实现的，可以通过蓝牙或USB-C连接。支持的无线编解码器有aptX、aptX HD、SBC、AAC和LDAC。
超过3000毫安时的电池目前很难在这样一个紧凑的情况下找到。在我们的Wi-Fi测试中，Cubot KingKong Mini 3没有达到前代产品的强大运行时间，但它仍能以14:23小时的时间说服人，应该可以为几天的适度使用提供足够的能量。
这款手机通过附带的充电器以最大10瓦的功率进行充电。因此，它最多需要2个小时就能充满电。
| Geekbench 5.5 | |
| Single-Core | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2022 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=175, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (341 - 437, n=15) | |
| Cubot KingKong Mini 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 | |
| Cubot King Kong Mini 2 | |
| Multi-Core | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2022 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (473 - 8816, n=175, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (1184 - 1456, n=15) | |
| Cubot KingKong Mini 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 | |
| Cubot King Kong Mini 2 | |
| PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (6596 - 9437, n=13) | |
| Cubot KingKong Mini 3 | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2022 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 166, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| Cubot KingKong Mini 3 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (7.5 - 22, n=16) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 | |
| Cubot King Kong Mini 2 | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2022 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (8 - 9.7, n=16) | |
| Cubot KingKong Mini 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 | |
| Cubot King Kong Mini 2 | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2022 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=208, last 2 years) | |
| Cubot KingKong Mini 3 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (5 - 13, n=16) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 | |
| Cubot King Kong Mini 2 | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2022 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=208, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (3.1 - 3.5, n=16) | |
| Cubot KingKong Mini 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 | |
| Cubot King Kong Mini 2 | |
| Cubot KingKong Mini 3 | Cubot King Kong Mini 2 | Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -29% | 55% | 41% | 681% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 277.3 | 275.5 -1% | 268.5 -3% | 284 ? 2% | 1889 ? 581% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 131 | 137.8 5% | 273.6 109% | 194.6 ? 49% | 1473 ? 1024% |
| Random Read 4KB | 43 | 25.5 -41% | 121 181% | 82.7 ? 92% | 278 ? 547% |
| Random Write 4KB | 46.4 | 9.4 -80% | 14.7 -68% | 55.4 ? 19% | 312 ? 572% |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.7 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Cubot KingKong Mini 3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Cubot King Kong Mini 2 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=209, last 2 years) | |
| Cubot KingKong Mini 3 | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2022 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 | |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 更加昂贵，更加强大
出厂后，Cubot KingKong Mini 3的价格与前代产品相比几乎翻了一番。然而，它在互联网上已经大幅下降，新机型也有一些改进：最明显的是性能的提高，现在处于中档水平，通常足以让系统顺利运行。
然后是NFC，这将使所有移动支付服务的朋友满意。扬声器做得很好，显示屏在需要时仍然非常明亮。
虽然它在我们的测试中顺利通过了潜水，但它对自然界的力量究竟有多强大仍是未知数。IP认证在这里会有帮助。
小的显示屏有一些优点，如方便和容易单手操作，但也有一些问题，因为按钮非常小。我们对相机没有信心，它几乎没有达到任何亮度，而且经常产生冲淡或噪音的照片。
像Cubot KingKong Mini 3这样方便的智能手机已经很少见了。此外，现在有中档的性能和明亮的屏幕，但仍然很难有可用的相机。
该 三星Galaxy XCover 5要大得多，但仍然比其他手机更方便，也更坚固。然而，它提供的功能要少得多。如果你想在一个有IP认证的小格式中获得大量的性能，你可以去选择 iPhone SE 2022但其价格要高得多。
价格和可用性
Cubot KingKong Mini 3可在amazon.de。，比如说。在审查的时候，价格也下降了很多。这款手机的售价约为166欧元（约166美元）。
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
- 01/16/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
