Notebookcheck Logo

Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139评测 - 商务笔记本电脑仅重900克

镁壳和桤木湖-P。

Dynabook为Portégé X30L配备了英特尔目前的Alder Lake处理器。镁合金外壳非常轻,约为900克,这使得这款商务笔记本成为一个非常移动的伴侣。然而,新处理器的性能没有达到预期。
Alder Lake Business Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Ultrabook Windows

通过Portégé X30系列,Dynabook(前身为东芝)提供了特别紧凑的13英寸显示屏的商务笔记本电脑。我们的测试设备,X30L,是一个标准的蚌壳,但随着 X30W,Dynabook也迎合了那些对可折叠机感兴趣的人。Portégé X30L的重量刚刚超过900克,主要针对那些希望在不牺牲许多端口或性能的情况下,在旅途中使用尽可能轻的笔记本的客户。我们的测试设备(X30L-K-139)除了夏普的IGZO 1080p显示屏外,还提供了英特尔的现代Core i5处理器、16GB内存和三星的快速PCIe 4.0固态硬盘。制造商为此收取约1600欧元的费用。

Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139 (Portégé X30L Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-1240P 12 x 1.2 - 4.4 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 15 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5-4800, DUal-Channel, onboard
Display
13.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, LQ133M1JW41, IGZO, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, 512 GB 
, 413 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 17.9 x 306 x 210
Battery
53 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4-cell
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 65W PSU, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
905 g, Power Supply: 375 g
Price
1600 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
85.1 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2022
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139
i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
905 g17.9 mm13.30"1920x1080
89.8 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2021
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
946 g16 mm13.00"2160x1350
89 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Dell Latitude 13 7330
i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1 kg16.96 mm13.30"1920x1080
90.1 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M
1.1 kg14.9 mm13.30"2880x1800
90.3 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2020
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA
i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620
1.1 kg16.1 mm13.30"1920x1080
85.6 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2021
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1 kg17 mm13.30"1920x1080
85.1 %
v7 (old)
Dynabook Portege X30L-G1331
i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620
859 g17.9 mm13.30"1920x1080

案例与设备

X30L的亮点之一当然是镁合金外壳,这就是为什么该设备的重量只比900克多一点。然而,矛盾的是,该设备几乎太轻了,因为它在操作上并不感觉特别高质量,而是像一架塑料轰炸机。在质量方面也仍有改进的余地。底座单元非常稳定,但在扭转时有轻微的吱吱声。显示屏的铰链调整得很好(最大打开角度为180度),但由于重量较轻,仅用一只手打开不太容易。显示屏盖子本身也很薄,而且相当灵活,但没有吱吱嘎嘎的声音,我们也无法挑起任何图片错误。

深蓝色(神秘蓝)的外壳在视觉上相当低调,从外面看只有Dynabook的字样和铰链盖作为视觉上的点缀。当你打开盖子时,键盘中央的蓝色指针替代物(AccuPoint)立即吸引了你的目光。然而,屏幕上方尤其是下方的边缘相当宽;如果是16:10的面板,这里也会很合适。

下部外壳的盖子用许多十字螺丝固定,但没有其他挂钩或塑料夹子。与之相比 旧型号(它甚至更轻一些),现在的维护选项更加有限,因为工作内存和WLAN模块都是同时焊接的。只有SSD可以被替换。

尺寸比较

309 mm 212 mm 17.9 mm 859 g309 mm 215 mm 17 mm 1 kg306 mm 210 mm 17.9 mm 905 g306.5 mm 199.95 mm 16.96 mm 1 kg304.3 mm 197.5 mm 16.1 mm 1.1 kg296.7 mm 210.5 mm 14.9 mm 1.1 kg292.8 mm 207.7 mm 16 mm 946 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

在端口方面,Dynabook表明,即使是一个紧凑的设备也不必只用USB-C来做。除了两个现代Thunderbolt端口,还有USB-A、HDMI,甚至还有一个千兆以太网端口。

左边:2个USB-C与Thunderbolt 4,HDMI 2.0,USB-A 3.2 Gen.1,3.5mm音频
左边:2个USB-C与Thunderbolt 4,HDMI 2.0,USB-A 3.2 Gen.1,3.5mm音频
右边:microSD读卡器,USB-A 3.2 Gen.1(供电),千兆以太网,Kensington锁
右边:microSD读卡器,USB-A 3.2 Gen.1(供电),千兆以太网,Kensington锁
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE
Intel Core i7-1185G7 (AV Pro V60)
149 MB/s +98%
Dynabook Portege X30L-G1331
Intel Core i5-10210U (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
78.1 MB/s +4%
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139
Intel Core i5-1240P (Angelbird Av Pro V60)
75.1 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (18.4 - 142, n=15, last 2 years)
53.6 MB/s -29%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE
Intel Core i7-1185G7 (AV Pro V60)
172.8 MB/s +107%
Dynabook Portege X30L-G1331
Intel Core i5-10210U (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
85.4 MB/s +2%
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139
Intel Core i5-1240P (Angelbird Av Pro V60)
83.6 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (22.5 - 207, n=15, last 2 years)
69.7 MB/s -17%

制造商还安装了英特尔的现代Wi-Fi 6E模块(AX211E),但我们无法与华硕的参考路由器的6GHz网络建立连接。在5GHz网络中的传输率仍然非常好。Portégé还可以选择安装LTE模块。

microSD读卡器提供了不错的传输速率,但网络摄像头只有一个弱的720p传感器,不能拍出特别好的照片。除了机械快门,还安装了一个红外摄像头,用于使用Windows Hello。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Dynabook Portege X30L-G1331
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1484 (1301min - 1644max) MBit/s
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1450 (1258min - 1519max) MBit/s
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1411 (1311min - 1563max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (1003 - 1501, n=4)
1320 MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1225 (540min - 1382max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1555 (1374min - 1656max) MBit/s
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1454 (1393min - 1484max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (1178 - 1623, n=4)
1409 MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1259 (628min - 1412max) MBit/s
Dynabook Portege X30L-G1331
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1257 (668min - 1414max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1492 (1365min - 1583max) MBit/s +9%
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1370 (1149min - 1492max) MBit/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (467 - 1824, n=68, last 2 years)
1285 MBit/s -6%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (64 - 1921, n=251)
1230 MBit/s -10%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1553 (1443min - 1620max) MBit/s +1%
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1536 (1381min - 1641max) MBit/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (772 - 1768, n=68, last 2 years)
1444 MBit/s -6%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=251)
1387 MBit/s -10%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600Tooltip
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1535 (1381-1641)
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1370 (1149-1492)
ColorChecker
16.8 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
11 ∆E
14 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
6 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
8 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
9 ∆E
ColorChecker Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139: 11.35 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 18.59 ∆E

输入设备 - 带有AccuPoint的Dynabook

黑色的Chiclet键盘有照明,提供了一般的打字感觉,它不像其他商务笔记本那样有高质量的感觉,击键时也感觉到有一点碎屑。此外,右侧的部分按键非常小而且很拥挤。

点击板原则上运行良好,但由于蓝色AccuPoint的额外专用键而显得非常小,而且左上方还有一个指纹扫描仪,占用了额外空间。然而,功能还可以,只是点击噪音非常大

键盘中央的AccuPoint工作起来很精确,尤其是与 ThinkPads最初的阻力太大,所以你必须用很大的力气,这有点影响了精确度。两个专用的鼠标键只有很短的行程,而且响亮的点击噪音感觉很廉价。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘照明
键盘照明

显示器 - 夏普的IGZO面板

Dynabook为Portégé X30L提供三种不同的哑光全高清IPS显示屏,但我们不推荐250 cd/m²和300 cd/m²(触摸)的两个版本。我们的评测样本采用了夏普公司的更明亮的IGZO显示屏,其平均亮度达到450cd/m²,而且还提供了良好的主观画面印象,因为即使是明亮的表面也不会出现颗粒感。

光晕不是问题,响应时间不明显,视角非常稳定,但我们可以从20%(约115cd/m²)或更低的亮度检测到PWM闪烁。然而,频率非常高,几乎是24kHz,所以这里应该没有限制。

子像素结构
子像素结构
只有最小的光晕
只有最小的光晕
视角
视角
445
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
494
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LQ133M1JW41 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 494 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 451.3 cd/m² Minimum: 27 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 491 cd/m²
Contrast: 1453:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
64.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139
LQ133M1JW41, IGZO, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
MND007ZA1-2, IPS, 2160x1350, 13"
Dell Latitude 13 7330
LG Philips 133WF9, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
SDC4172, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3"
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA
AUO5E2D, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE
LQ133M1JW48, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Dynabook Portege X30L-G1331
Toshiba TOS508F, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Display
9%
2%
37%
7%
5%
4%
Display P3 Coverage
64.3
70.4
9%
66.1
3%
99.8
55%
69
7%
67.3
5%
66.9
4%
sRGB Coverage
94.5
99.9
6%
93.5
-1%
100
6%
99.4
5%
98.4
4%
97.6
3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
64.8
72
11%
68.2
5%
97.8
51%
70.9
9%
68.8
6%
67.8
5%
Response Times
-6%
-11%
30%
-34%
-60%
-19%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
39 ?(22.7, 26.3)
46.8 ?(22, 24.8)
-20%
48.4 ?(23.6, 24.8)
-24%
2.1 ?(1.1, 1)
95%
60.8 ?(30.8, 30)
-56%
61.2 ?(32, 29.2)
-57%
54.8 ?(26, 28.8)
-41%
Response Time Black / White *
30.3 ?(15.3, 15)
28 ?(13.2, 14.8)
8%
29.6 ?(14.8, 14.8)
2%
1.68 ?(0.86, 0.82)
94%
33.8 ?(17.2, 16.6)
-12%
37.6 ?(18.8, 18.8)
-24%
35.6 ?(19.2, 16.4)
-17%
PWM Frequency
23600 ?(20)
240.4 ?(53)
-99%
211.9 ?(30)
-99%
23810 ?(24)
1%
Screen
27%
22%
138%
24%
6%
17%
Brightness middle
494
460
-7%
460.1
-7%
336
-32%
411
-17%
348
-30%
482
-2%
Brightness
451
434
-4%
445
-1%
338
-25%
388
-14%
350
-22%
452
0%
Brightness Distribution
88
92
5%
89
1%
99
13%
87
-1%
92
5%
91
3%
Black Level *
0.34
0.27
21%
0.31
9%
0.02
94%
0.22
35%
0.31
9%
0.4
-18%
Contrast
1453
1704
17%
1484
2%
16800
1056%
1868
29%
1123
-23%
1205
-17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.8
1.1
71%
2.42
36%
1.8
53%
1.8
53%
2.8
26%
1.85
51%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.2
4.5
56%
3.97
61%
3.8
63%
4.1
60%
6.8
33%
3.08
70%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.1
1
9%
0.77
30%
1.8
-64%
1
9%
0.8
27%
1.2
-9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.8
1.6
76%
2.3
66%
0.9
87%
2.5
63%
4.8
29%
2
71%
Gamma
2.18 101%
2.2 100%
2.23 99%
2.22 99%
2.26 97%
2.2 100%
2.1 105%
CCT
6894 94%
6475 100%
6262 104%
6580 99%
6448 101%
6978 93%
6822 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
65.7
64.7
62.5
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.9
99.3
97.7
Total Average (Program / Settings)
10% / 18%
4% / 13%
68% / 96%
-1% / 12%
-16% / -7%
1% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

我们用专业的CalMAN软件(X-Rite i1 Pro2分光光度计)测量了面板的数值,出厂时的表现不是很好,因为有明显可见的紫色偏色,而且与sRGB参考值相比,偏差非常高。你肯定应该校准面板(我们的配置文件可在上面免费下载),因为这里有很大的潜力,校准后的性能非常好。sRGB色彩空间几乎被完全覆盖,总体而言,这是一款适合办公室使用的面板。

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN 灰度标定
CalMAN 灰度标定
CalMAN 饱和度已校准
CalMAN 饱和度已校准
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.3 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22.7 ms rise
↘ 26.3 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 23600 Hz ≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 23600 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 23600 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8482 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在30%的亮度下没有PWM闪烁
在30%的亮度下没有PWM闪烁
亮度为20%时出现PWM闪烁
亮度为20%时出现PWM闪烁
亮度为10%时出现PWM闪烁
亮度为10%时出现PWM闪烁
亮度为0%时的PWM闪烁
亮度为0%时的PWM闪烁

在户外,你可以从哑光表面和高屏幕亮度中受益。只要你避免阳光直射,你仍然可以在明亮的环境中合理地工作。

在阳光下
在阳光下

性能 - Alder Lake和弱冷

Dynabook提供了英特尔更快的Alder Lake P CPU。除了我们测试设备的酷睿i5外,还提供酷睿i7或酷睿i3(也是vPro版本)。制造商没有提供额外的性能配置文件,所以这里只能使用Windows配置文件。这基本上是完全没问题的,但配置文件不能很好地适应薄弱的冷却。处理器可以在很短的时间内消耗大量的电力(高达64瓦),但随后温度就会突破屋顶,芯片突然被节流到11瓦。之后,它又可以短暂地消耗超过20瓦,然后再稳定在15瓦的水平。在更高效的配置文件中,最大值要低一些(例如35瓦),也会保持更长的时间,但即使如此,也会降到11瓦,结果总体上是一样的。看一下冷却情况,例如将PL2设置为25瓦,然后将永久消耗量设置为15瓦,这对Alder Lake U芯片来说实际上是很理想的。

 
 

处理器

ǞǞǞ 英特尔酷睿i5-1240P提供四个快速性能和八个效率核心。由于之前描述的TDP问题,多核性能,也就是与Alder Lake-U芯片的主要区别,变成了相当温和的。相比于 旧的X30W(即可转换的型号)的Tiger Lake 处理器相比,多核性能只是略高,这令人失望。另一方面,单核性能非常好,但这也可能是用Alder Lake-U,如 酷睿i5-1235U(2倍性能,8倍效率)。

总的来说,Portégé为日常办公提供足够的性能,在大多数情况下,单核性能是最重要的因素。在电池模式下,性能甚至没有进一步降低。更多的CPU基准测试可在 我们的技术部分可以获得。

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

09018027036045054063072081090099010801170126013501440153016201710Tooltip
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139 Intel Core i5-1240P: Ø802 (790-915.29)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE Intel Core i7-1160G7: Ø659 (587.69-862.27)
Dell Latitude 13 7330 Intel Core i7-1265U: Ø1068 (1010.48-1420.35)
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U: Ø1607 (1576.98-1742.1)
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø413 (406.64-496.34)
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Intel Core i7-1185G7: Ø672 (651.67-816.61)
Dynabook Portege X30L-G1331 Intel Core i5-10210U: Ø479 (475.43-482.26)
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø758 (724.95-781.1)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Subnotebook
 
84.9 pt
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
78 pt
Dell Latitude 13 7330
Intel Core i7-1265U
73.4 pt
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
 
65.1 pt
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139
Intel Core i5-1240P
58.7 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE -1!
Intel Core i7-1160G7
50.6 pt
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE
Intel Core i7-1185G7
50 pt
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA -6!
Intel Core i5-8265U
36 pt
Dynabook Portege X30L-G1331 -2!
Intel Core i5-10210U
35.6 pt

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
915 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
73.1 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
149.7 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2265 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
571 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1369 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
5871 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
90 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
87.4 pt
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
 
55.5 pt
Dell Latitude 13 7330
Intel Core i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
54.3 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
53.2 pt
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
45.9 pt
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
43 pt
Dynabook Portege X30L-G1331
Intel Core i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620
32 pt
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA -1!
Intel Core i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620
30.5 pt

系统性能

看一下一般的系统性能,没有什么惊喜。Dynabook对输入的反应很快,酷睿i5处理器和快速固态硬盘的结合使得系统很敏捷。合成测试中的基准结果是平均水平。

我们的测试设备Dynabook Portégé X30L仍以Windows 10 Pro发货,然而,在任何时候都可以免费升级到Windows 11。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4993 - 7788, n=57, last 2 years)
6557 Points +31%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6346 Points +27%
Dell Latitude 13 7330
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1265U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
5182 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (4881 - 5345, n=11)
5098 Points +2%
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4988 Points
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV1T02
4899 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
4615 Points -7%
Dynabook Portege X30L-G1331
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
4217 Points -15%
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
3636 Points -27%
PCMark 10 Score
4988 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Subnotebook
  (14554 - 109035, n=68, last 2 years)
76598 MB/s +32%
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
58196 MB/s
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
56303 MB/s -3%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (23312 - 70537, n=16)
52845 MB/s -9%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
47701 MB/s -18%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
46915 MB/s -19%
Dell Latitude 13 7330
Intel Core i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
40212 MB/s -31%
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA
Intel Core i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620
28956 MB/s -50%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

我们的标准延迟测试(网页浏览、YouTube 4K播放、CPU负载)揭示了一些问题,而且由于手头的BIOS版本,测试设备不适合使用实时音频应用程序。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3488.6 μs *
Dynabook Portege X30L-G1331
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
2108 μs * +40%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
1350 μs * +61%
Dell Latitude 13 7330
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1265U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
829.5 μs * +76%
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV1T02
770 μs * +78%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
588.9 μs * +83%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储

Dynabook依靠的是三星的快速PCIe 4.0固态硬盘。PM9A1是980 Pro的OEM版本,一开始的传输率非常好,但性能很快就明显下降,这可能是由于SSD的温度造成的。然而,在日常使用中,这种影响会很小。在总共512GB中,第一次启动后有413GB可供用户使用。更多的SSD基准测试可在 这里.

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 5936.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3449.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 421.41 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 301.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 76.33 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 139.47 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 267.03 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 598.73 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
 
89.9 pt
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
82 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
73.3 pt
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
70.2 pt
Dynabook Portege X30L-G1331
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
66.9 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
60.8 pt
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE
Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV1T02
51.4 pt
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
36 pt
Dell Latitude 13 7330
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
32.1 pt

* ... smaller is better

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

033567010051340167520102345268030153350368540204355469050255360569560306365Tooltip
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139: Ø2309 (1663.07-6603.56)

图形卡

GPU-Z Iris Xe Graphics G7
GPU-Z Iris Xe Graphics G7

芯片 英特尔Iris Xe图形G7我们已经从旧的Tiger Lake 处理器中了解到,在与Core i5的组合中,它是80 EUs的较慢版本。该iGPU为日常办公提供了足够的性能,但在工作之余进行游戏时,它并没有取得特别好的成绩。理论上,你可以在家里连接一个外部GPU,但由于CPU的多核性能较低,说实话这没有什么意义。

快速下降的TDP限制也对iGPU产生了影响,性能并不完全稳定;Time Spy 的压力测试没有通过93%。然而,在电池模式下,GPU的性能并没有进一步降低。更多的GPU基准测试可在 这里.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Subnotebook
 
100 pt
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED -1!
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
90.2 pt
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
69.5 pt
Dell Latitude 13 7330
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1265U
57.1 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE -1!
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1160G7
53.6 pt
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P
52.1 pt
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
 
51.1 pt
Dynabook Portege X30L-G1331 -1!
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U
17.1 pt
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA -1!
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
16.3 pt
3DMark 11 Performance
5088 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
17182 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3785 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1333 points
Help

Witcher 3 FPS-Diagramm

012345678910111213Tooltip
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139 i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs: Ø10.8 (9-13)
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 69 55.5 16.9 7.61
The Witcher 3 (2015) 70 47 23 10.8
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 95.8 65 39.9 39.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 31.1 17.7 12.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 44.2 29.3 26.5
Strange Brigade (2018) 61.8 27.8 22.2 18.1
F1 2021 (2021) 66.7 28.7 24.4 16.1

排放与能源

噪声排放

在空闲状态下,该设备通常是无声的,但风扇会不时地启动。然而,这几乎没有人注意到,低于30dB(A)。然而,只要设备的负荷稍大一些,小风扇就会立即跳到最大速度。略低于35 dB(A)的噪音已经可以清楚地听到,而且也是相对较高的频率,你只是注意到这是一个小风扇。我们无法检测到任何其他电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle
24.9 / 24.9 / 28.7 dB(A)
Load
35.6 / 35.6 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.9 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2025.527.429.435.928.72530.733.730.532.125.93126.629.82729.827.24028.429.629.932.5325033.729.731.331.233.26322.422.122.926.624.28018.920.521.926.321.1100212122.921.320.412519.218.424.320.920.316017.618.322.920.620.620017.618.222.41821.325016.718.421.716.217.631517.118.319.615.117.340020.119.416.813.714.750020.119.815.512.813.36302221.718.612.213.780023.52318.912.213.7100025.725.116.711.713.912502525.117.911.612.81600262619.411.712.2200028.826.916.212.112.6250025.124.715.512.212.5315020.820.714.512.412.4400021.521.415.212.612.8500019.1191412.713.163001716.813.913.313.4800014.214.113.613.2131000013.313.413.713.113.41250012.91314.613.813.61600013.514.315.514.313.6SPL35.63528.724.925.5N21.91.10.60.7median 20.1median 19.4median 16.7median 13.1median 13.6Delta3.332.51.82.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseDynabook Portégé X30L-K-139
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
Dell Latitude 13 7330
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1265U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV1T02
Dynabook Portege X30L-G1331
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Noise
-2%
-0%
1%
-7%
2%
-6%
off / environment *
24.9
24.9
-0%
23.4
6%
24
4%
29.5
-18%
23.5
6%
28.5
-14%
Idle Minimum *
24.9
24.9
-0%
23.4
6%
24
4%
29.5
-18%
23.5
6%
28.5
-14%
Idle Average *
24.9
26.3
-6%
23.4
6%
24
4%
30
-20%
23.5
6%
28.5
-14%
Idle Maximum *
28.7
31.8
-11%
23.4
18%
24
16%
30.3
-6%
28
2%
28.5
1%
Load Average *
35.6
34.3
4%
37.8
-6%
33.1
7%
31.6
11%
35
2%
32
10%
Witcher 3 ultra *
35.6
34.3
4%
39.2
-10%
40.2
-13%
35
2%
Load Maximum *
35.6
37.5
-5%
43
-21%
41.7
-17%
31.6
11%
38.5
-8%
38
-7%

* ... smaller is better

温度

表面温度绝对不挑剔。即使在压力测试中,Portégé X30L仍然可以毫无问题地放在腿上,而且在低负荷时你根本感觉不到任何热量。然而,考虑到15瓦的低TDP限制,这其实并不令人惊讶。由于CPU和iGPU在压力测试中必须分享这个数值,所以时钟也相应地低。

CPU/iGPU数据压力测试
CPU/iGPU数据压力测试
Max. Load
 37 °C42.8 °C40.4 °C 
 35.7 °C40.7 °C34.5 °C 
 27 °C27.1 °C27.4 °C 
Maximum: 42.8 °C
Average: 34.7 °C
37.2 °C39.8 °C36.4 °C
27.8 °C39.1 °C34.4 °C
27.2 °C28.5 °C28.1 °C
Maximum: 39.8 °C
Average: 33.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  36.9 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (+0.8 °C / 1.5 F).
顶面的表面温度(应力测试)
顶面的表面温度(应力测试)
底部表面温度(压力测试)
底部表面温度(压力测试)
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Intel Core i7-1160G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Dell Latitude 13 7330
Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Dynabook Portege X30L-G1331
Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
Heat
1%
7%
-13%
-5%
-2%
-16%
Maximum Upper Side *
42.8
42.2
1%
38.6
10%
47.9
-12%
41.1
4%
42.1
2%
41.2
4%
Maximum Bottom *
39.8
47.5
-19%
42
-6%
56.1
-41%
47.5
-19%
46.7
-17%
44
-11%
Idle Upper Side *
27
24.3
10%
23.8
12%
26.8
1%
26.4
2%
25.9
4%
34.6
-28%
Idle Bottom *
28
25.3
10%
24.6
12%
27.3
2%
29.7
-6%
26.5
5%
36.2
-29%

* ... smaller is better

演讲者

立体声扬声器的声音相对较大,但听起来极为单薄。该模块很适合会议使用,因为语音再现得益于这里的线性高音再现,但我们肯定会建议使用外部扬声器或耳机播放音乐或视频。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.9262532.124.53129.824.64032.527.15031.226.66326.625.38026.324.110021.325.812520.926.516020.626.22001828.425016.236.331515.150.840013.762.550012.865.663012.267.680012.269.7100011.770.6125011.670.6160011.771.8200012.170.7250012.270.6315012.470.3400012.670.5500012.769.1630013.369.4800013.273.21000013.172.81250013.872.81600014.366.8SPL24.982.5N0.654.2median 13.1median 69.4Delta1.89.626.22924.324.930.135.126.932.82827.420.830.119.335.926.443.419.847.421.654.519.561.519.264.416.768.618.37016.172.212.977.512.778.611.972.111.169.610.578.411.176.311.275.611.673.611.771.21272.912.371.512.371.612.365.312.360.111.655.824.986.40.771median 12.3median 71.22.75.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseDynabook Portégé X30L-K-139Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 37.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源消耗

Portégé X30L在能源测量方面基本上非常有效。在负载期间,消耗量只达到电源的极限,超过60瓦,但笔记本很快就减少了,在压力测试中消耗量稳定在30瓦左右(约15瓦的TDP)。

因此,随附的65瓦电源的尺寸是足够的。电源本身也非常紧凑,但由于电缆较长,重量为375克,竞争对手在这里往往有优势。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.36 / 0.7 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.9 / 6.4 / 7.2 Watt
Load midlight 35.8 / 63.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
Dell Latitude 13 7330
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1265U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV1T02
Dynabook Portege X30L-G1331
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Power Consumption
6%
-0%
-25%
9%
0%
12%
Idle Minimum *
3.9
3.3
15%
2.8
28%
4.8
-23%
3.5
10%
3.5
10%
2.8
28%
Idle Average *
6.4
5.7
11%
4.8
25%
8.7
-36%
5.1
20%
6.1
5%
4.9
23%
Idle Maximum *
7.2
9.1
-26%
7.3
-1%
10.1
-40%
8.1
-13%
7.2
-0%
9
-25%
Load Average *
35.8
29.6
17%
48.1
-34%
45.6
-27%
35.6
1%
39.9
-11%
31.2
13%
Witcher 3 ultra *
29.4
27.7
6%
35.4
-20%
42.4
-44%
34.1
-16%
Load Maximum *
63.4
55.1
13%
63.6
-0%
49.5
22%
44.7
29%
54.9
13%
49.4
22%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø29.4 (25.7-33.7)
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø31 (22.6-63.4)

Power consumption with external monitor

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø29.6 (22.1-63.3)
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø39.2 (23-48.8)
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø28 (22.8-35.5)
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø30.6 (22.1-63.2)
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø29.1 (22.8-33.4)
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø27.6 (23.8-40.9)
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø6.99 (6.3-9.33)

电池寿命

装载过程
装载过程

评测样本的53Wh电池实现了良好的电池运行时间,总体而言,对比设备在这里都处于非常相似的水平。在我们的WLAN测试中,在150cd/m²(相当于最大亮度的30%)的情况下,我们确定了超过10小时的时间,在全亮度下甚至超过8小时。高效的IGZO显示屏在这里是很明显的。

充满电需要2.5小时以上,但半小时后已经可以达到45%。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 104)
10h 11min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 104)
8h 07min
Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139
i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 53 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE
i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 48.2 Wh
Dell Latitude 13 7330
i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 41 Wh
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 67 Wh
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA
i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 56.2 Wh
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 50 Wh
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 53 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
1%
-19%
-11%
-1%
-18%
3%
14%
WiFi Websurfing
611
596
-2%
497
-19%
550
-10%
605
-1%
492
-19%
658
8%
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
487
503
3%
430
-12%
487
0%
409
-16%
472
-3%

Pros

+ 轻巧的镁合金外壳
+ 许多端口和现代功能
+ 电池寿命长
+ 不错的系统性能
+ 明亮而无光泽的IPS显示屏

Cons

- 风机启动非常快
- Alder Lake-P仍然明显低于其能力
- SSD性能崩溃
- 差劲的网络摄像头
- 扩音器太弱
- 只有一年的保修期

结论 - 具有许多端口的轻型商务笔记本

在审查中。Dynabook Portégé X30L-K。测试设备由德国Dynabook公司提供。
在审查中。Dynabook Portégé X30L-K。测试设备由德国Dynabook公司提供。

Dynabook Portégé X30L表明,即使是非常紧凑和轻便的商务笔记本电脑也不必没有很多端口。通过Thunderbolt 4、PCIe 4.0和Wi-Fi 6E,也采用了最新的技术,并可选择LTE模块。

镁合金外壳非常轻,稳定性也很好。哑光的全高清面板基本上也很好,但16:10的面板也很容易装在这里。你还注意到,冷却效果简直太弱了,而且选择Alder Lake-P处理器没有意义,因为多核性能只比Tiger Lake 的前辈稍好一些。一个调整了TDP限制的Alder Lake-U处理器会更适合这里。我们还注意到英特尔当前芯片的高TDP限制的影响,因为小风扇即使在低负载时也会立即达到最大速度。

极轻,电池寿命长,端口多。Dynabook Portégé X30L提供了许多功能和现代技术,但仍有很大的改进空间,特别是在性能方面。16:10的显示屏对工作来说也是一个不错的补充。

竞争对手提供的端口要少得多,而且通常要重一些,但它们在其他方面有优势。例如,输入设备或显示器的 ThinkPad X1 Nano应该被提及。新的 戴尔Latitude 13 7330通过Alder-Lake-U提供了一个更平衡的性能包,而且还有一个更好的键盘。如果你喜欢更多的性能和非常好的OLED面板,你将很难避免 华硕ZenBook S 13它是目前市场上采用AMD处理器的最佳紧凑型笔记本之一。

价格和可用性

我们的测试设备Dynabook Portégé X30L目前在各在线零售商处的售价约为1530欧元,例如在HeinzSoft。.

Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139 - 08/26/2022 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
78 / 98 → 80%
Keyboard
78%
Pointing Device
82%
Connectivity
67 / 75 → 89%
Weight
77 / 20-75 → 100%
Battery
88%
Display
87%
Games Performance
62 / 78 → 80%
Application Performance
87 / 85 → 100%
Temperature
91%
Noise
84%
Audio
72 / 91 → 79%
Camera
29 / 85 → 34%
Average
76%
85%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Dynabook Portégé X30L-K-139评测 - 商务笔记本电脑仅重900克
Andreas Osthoff, 2022-08-31 (Update: 2022-08-31)