Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K笔记本电脑评测--一个具有端口多样性的轻量级产品
通过Dynabook Portégé X30-W-J-10K,东芝的继任者向市场发送了一个极其有趣的设备。以下特点特别吸引我们的眼球:重量不到一公斤的镁合金外壳和一个哑光的13.3英寸全高清触摸屏。此外,该设备提供了一个英特尔Core i7 1165G7与16GB DDR-4内存和1TB NVMe SSD作为存储解决方案。Dynabook还为Portégé提供了许多端口和特殊的保修。
可能的竞争对手是富士通LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE。,以及 戴尔Latitude 9420 2合1还有HP Elite Dragonfly Max.本评论将显示Dynabook Portégé是否能与这些对手竞争,以及2299欧元(约合2666美元)的价格是否合理。
Possible competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.2 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 962 g | 17.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
85.6 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1 kg | 17 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
89 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 13.94 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
90.8 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2021 | HP Elite Dragonfly Max i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 16 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和功能 - 带有Thunderbolt 4的高质量笔记本电脑
镁合金外壳以其极低的重量和极高的制造质量而表现出色。Portégé也给人留下了非常坚固的印象。它可以很好地握在手中,因此是理想的日常伴侣。端口的位置在这里实现得非常好。它们被巧妙地放置在设备中心的侧面,以确保打字时的舒适性,即使所有端口都被占用。
与竞争对手相比,我们的测试设备在WLAN性能方面处于领先地位,因此能够令人信服。Dynabook在这里安装了两个网络摄像头,其质量是足够的。其中一个像往常一样位于显示屏内,并可以通过手动快门关闭。第二个网络摄像头放在键盘底座上,在平板电脑模式下可以用30帧/秒的全高清和800万像素记录周围环境。只有微型SD读卡器的性能低于平均水平。
连接设备
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE (AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K (AV Pro V60) | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE (AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=28, last 2 years) | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K (AV Pro V60) |
担保
Dynabook为买方提供了特殊的保修服务,并依靠对自己的制造质量的高度信任。Portégé有一年的退款保证。如果设备在一年内出现故障,而没有软件、用户或环境的影响,Dynabook将免费维修设备,并在此基础上退还购买价格。然而,这取决于用户在购买设备后30天内进行注册。关于这一点的更多信息可以在Dynabook上找到。.
输入设备 - 可扩展的静音键盘
键盘的键程不是特别长,但考虑到设备的高度较低,这是可以接受的。键盘的反压力还可以。这种布局对用户来说似乎有点束手束脚,但随着时间的推移你会习惯的。键盘照明有三个级别,可以通过FN+Y轻松调整。作为一个额外的功能,Dynabook增加了一个带有四个额外提示的主动输入笔。用户可以通过一个附带的环来连接它,这个环必须粘在机箱上。
ClickPad不是特别大,只有10 x 5.5厘米(约3.9 x 2.2英寸),但由于其结构,已经被最大化了。指纹传感器位于触摸板的左上角。滑动性能很好,内置按键的反馈也很明显。
要进入Portégé的内部,必须从底板上拆下12颗螺丝。只有SSD和风扇可以直接接触。不幸的是,没有额外的插槽来放置另一块固态硬盘。
显示屏 - 哑光13英寸,无PWM
哑光的13.3英寸IPS触摸显示屏以全高清分辨率提供良好的对比度和黑值,在这方面领先于竞争对手。sRGB色彩空间覆盖率为98%,因此该设备在显示校准后也适用于编辑图片和视频。工厂校准对日常应用来说是足够的。
90%的照度是好的,亮度也是坚实的390 cd/m²。与其价格相符的是,该面板的视角也很稳定,即使在斜视的情况下,颜色和对比度也不会颠倒。结合哑光显示屏,我们的设备在户外使用时的低反射视角也能令人信服。与竞争对手相比,Portégé有一个良好的整体包装。只有HP Elite Dragonfly Max 的显示屏亮度几乎是其两倍。
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 422 cd/m²
Contrast: 1826:1 (Black: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.8
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
72.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K LQ133M1JW47, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE LQ133M1JW48, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | HP Elite Dragonfly Max InfoVision X133NVFL R0, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -3% | 9% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 69.3 | 67.3 -3% | 80.7 16% | |
sRGB Coverage | 98.6 | 98.4 0% | 100 1% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.9 | 68.8 -6% | 79.7 9% | |
Response Times | -2% | 11% | 20% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 63.6 ? | 61.2 ? 4% | 54 ? 15% | 44.8 ? 30% |
Response Time Black / White * | 35.2 ? | 37.6 ? -7% | 32.8 ? 7% | 32 ? 9% |
PWM Frequency | 211.9 ? | |||
Screen | -27% | -35% | 6% | |
Brightness middle | 420 | 348 -17% | 483.6 15% | 777.5 85% |
Brightness | 390 | 350 -10% | 465 19% | 727 86% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 92 2% | 92 2% | 75 -17% |
Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.31 -35% | 0.32 -39% | 0.44 -91% |
Contrast | 1826 | 1123 -38% | 1511 -17% | 1767 -3% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 2.8 -65% | 3.69 -117% | 1.62 5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.5 | 6.8 -24% | 5.97 -9% | 5.26 4% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.8 | 0.8 -0% | 2.05 -156% | 1.32 -65% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3 | 4.8 -60% | 3.5 -17% | 1.6 47% |
Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.2 100% | 2.04 108% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6406 101% | 6978 93% | 6158 106% | 6538 99% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 72.3 | |||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 94.8 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -11% /
-19% | -5% /
-19% | 13% /
8% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise | |
↘ 20.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
63.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 30.8 ms rise | |
↘ 32.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能、排放和电池寿命
制造商使用英特尔酷睿i7 1165G7的处理器它提供了一个非常好的性能。在高性能情况下,在我们的CineBench R15多重耐力测试中,即使在较长时间内,性能也几乎保持稳定。该处理器可以在短时间内使用41瓦,但几秒钟后这一数值下降到28瓦。由于集成了Intel Iris XE图形,Portégé也适合于一些游戏。.与使用相同显卡的竞争设备相比,这里的性能相当低于平均水平。在电池模式下,永久可用的CPU功率从28W减少到20W。另一方面,图形性能在电池供电时保持稳定。
结合快速的PCIe-SSD(3.0 x 4),系统的整体性能非常好,所有的输入都能无延迟地实现。在我们的标准化延迟测试中,测试设备也没有显示出任何突出的问题。
在高要求的任务中,风扇显示出相当明显的脉动行为,并且上下跳动。Dynabook Portégé只在上边缘和底部有明显的温度。另一方面,该设备在日常工作中保持相当安静和凉爽。废热被巧妙地散布在键盘后面的铰链之间,因此,即使在平板电脑模式下也能产生良好的气流。为了在正常和平板电脑模式下获得足够的新鲜空气,机脚被做得更厚一些,这样可以从下面或侧面吸入足够的空气。我们注意到在操作过程中会有轻微的电子噪音,这主要是在空闲模式下可以感觉到的。
在实际的WLAN测试中,电池运行时间非常好。在150cd/m²的情况下,它可以持续近11个小时,在全亮度下可以持续近8个小时。该设备在一个多小时内就能瞬间充电。如果你从其他测试设备中得出结论,只有 戴尔Latitude 9420由于更大的电池,它的续航能力更强一些。
Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average of class Convertible (616 - 18698, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (2525 - 6862, n=64) | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Average of class Convertible (308 - 1980, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1110 - 1539, n=59) | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Convertible (242 - 7303, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1060 - 2657, n=81) | |
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 781, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (442 - 589, n=81) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (553 - 1027, n=86) | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE | |
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 302, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (115 - 230, n=78) | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (468 - 1138, n=80) | |
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Average of class Convertible (175 - 1059, n=59, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Convertible (12977 - 72400, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (15347 - 27405, n=80) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Average of class Convertible (3672 - 6493, n=60, last 2 years) | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (4478 - 5507, n=80) | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Convertible (663 - 14016, n=63, last 2 years) | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (3078 - 5926, n=77) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Convertible (319 - 2062, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1302 - 1595, n=77) | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Convertible (0.73 - 22.4, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1.39 - 8.47, n=80) | |
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Average of class Convertible (42 - 121.5, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE | |
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (21.5 - 88.1, n=78) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (0.552 - 1.002, n=80) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 1.013, n=59, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Convertible (1486 - 7963, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4531 - 5454, n=50) | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Average of class Convertible (3975 - 12059, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (8997 - 11505, n=50) | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE | |
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average of class Convertible (2764 - 10800, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5570 - 7136, n=50) | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE | |
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Convertible (811 - 12360, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4083 - 5550, n=50) | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max |
PCMark 10 Score | 5019 points | |
Help |
DPC延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE | |
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV1T02 | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G | HP Elite Dragonfly Max Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Average Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 4% | 14% | -3% | 19% | 31% | |
Write 4K | 104 | 114.8 10% | 190 83% | 99 -5% | 139.7 ? 34% | 136.3 ? 31% |
Read 4K | 44 | 49.53 13% | 48.1 9% | 52.3 19% | 49.9 ? 13% | 60.9 ? 38% |
Write Seq | 1833 | 1833 0% | 1700 -7% | 1765 -4% | 2036 ? 11% | 2559 ? 40% |
Read Seq | 2220 | 2260 2% | 1594 -28% | 2065 -7% | 2014 ? -9% | 2808 ? 26% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 298 | 323.5 9% | 517 73% | 291.7 -2% | 461 ? 55% | 368 ? 23% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 326 | 340.5 4% | 477.8 47% | 314 -4% | 499 ? 53% | 462 ? 42% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 3024 | 3048 1% | 1841 -39% | 2549 -16% | 2903 ? -4% | 3354 ? 11% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3546 | 3282 -7% | 2472 -30% | 3282 -7% | 3479 ? -2% | 4767 ? 34% |
AS SSD | -7% | -54% | -22% | 24% | -9% | |
Seq Read | 2673 | 2622 -2% | 2102 -21% | 2700 1% | 2553 ? -4% | 3539 ? 32% |
Seq Write | 1338 | 1322 -1% | 1155 -14% | 1483 11% | 2084 ? 56% | 2222 ? 66% |
4K Read | 47.85 | 48.36 1% | 45.63 -5% | 48.73 2% | 53.1 ? 11% | 53.7 ? 12% |
4K Write | 124 | 121.1 -2% | 238.9 93% | 126.4 2% | 131.2 ? 6% | 160.8 ? 30% |
4K-64 Read | 762 | 765 0% | 752 -1% | 819 7% | 1477 ? 94% | 857 ? 12% |
4K-64 Write | 1678 | 1343 -20% | 396.1 -76% | 1252 -25% | 1805 ? 8% | 1533 ? -9% |
Access Time Read * | 0.066 | 0.074 -12% | 0.062 6% | 0.066 -0% | 0.04983 ? 24% | 0.08748 ? -33% |
Access Time Write * | 0.029 | 0.033 -14% | 0.167 -476% | 0.093 -221% | 0.04222 ? -46% | 0.09485 ? -227% |
Score Read | 1078 | 1076 0% | 1008 -6% | 1138 6% | 1786 ? 66% | 1263 ? 17% |
Score Write | 1937 | 1596 -18% | 751 -61% | 1527 -21% | 2144 ? 11% | 1916 ? -1% |
Score Total | 3511 | 3169 -10% | 2238 -36% | 3197 -9% | 4826 ? 37% | 3771 ? 7% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1629 | 1588 | 1927 | 2098 ? | 2254 ? | |
Copy Program MB/s | 855 | 1038 | 573 | 500 ? | 655 ? | |
Copy Game MB/s | 1549 | 1006 | 1145 | 1132 ? | 1444 ? | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
-2% | -20% /
-26% | -13% /
-14% | 22% /
22% | 11% /
8% |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 25888 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 6676 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4814 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1724 points | |
Help |
Witcher 3 FPS-Diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 84.1 | 75.8 | 22.4 | 9.77 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 85 | 53.6 | 31 | 13.4 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 81.6 | 69.6 | 54.7 | 52.2 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 32.5 | 18.1 | 12.6 | 10.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 25.2 | 29.6 | 25.2 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 86.1 | 37.7 | 29.9 | 24.2 | |
F1 2020 (2020) | 59.6 | 30.6 | 26.2 | 15.4 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25 / 25 / 25 dB(A) |
Load |
| 31.2 / 43.1 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+1 °C / 1.8 F).
演讲者
扬声器的中音和高音在同类标准中还可以。Dynabook应该只在低音上下功夫
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Fujitsu LifeBook U9311X i7 LTE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源消耗
Off / Standby | 0.4 / 1.1 Watt |
Idle | 3.1 / 5.6 / 6.4 Watt |
Load |
42.8 / 69 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Energy consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
电池寿命
Pros
Cons
结论 - 有能力的商业转换,有改进的潜力
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K的轻质镁合金外壳不能只以其重量来说服人。手感和做工对于这个价格来说是非常好的。我们还喜欢哑光触摸屏,它的对比度和黑色水平令人信服。该设备的外部尺寸为一张DIN A4纸,但仍有良好的连接性。通过两个雷电4接口之一的USB-C接口,该设备可以在一个多小时内完全充电。制造商还在键盘底座上安装了第二个网络摄像头,这扩大了应用的可能性。
英特尔第11代处理器、1TB固态硬盘和16GB工作内存,使我们的评测样品能够以高系统性能而令人信服,然而,在高要求的任务中,这可能会使电池迅速陷入困境。在低负载情况下,电池是非常耐用的。制造商的特别保修为购买提供了额外的动力。
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K成为理想的日常伴侣,其良好的系统性能和运行时间令人信服。
弱点是风扇,它在负载下会变得很响,但没有高频率的表现。输入设备很好,但仍有改进的余地。我们希望Dynabook能有更长的键程和更大的点击板。不幸的是,第二个M.2插槽也没有在机箱中找到。
如果你把它与竞争对手相比,你会得到一个超轻的设备,有足够的系统性能和长的电池寿命。哑光触摸屏和一定数量的连接性使其外形更加完美。如果你不介意多一点重量,你应该看看更昂贵的戴尔Latitude 9420 2合1.笔记本 富士通的LifeBook U9311X与Dynabook最为相似,也是将非常轻的外壳与许多端口结合起来,而 HP EliteBook Dragonfly Max主要提供更高的外壳质量以及更好的键盘。
价格和可用性
配备英特尔酷睿i5 1135G7、8GB内存和256GB固态硬盘的Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K在OfficePartner上的售价约为1,200欧元(约合1,391美元)。.配备英特尔酷睿i7 1165G7、16GB工作内存和512GB固态硬盘的变体在OfficePartner上的售价为1,800欧元(约合2,086元)。.如果你需要更多的存储空间,你可以从TSComputer购买我们的测试配置。购买,价格为2200欧元(约合人民币2550元)。
Dynabook Portégé X30W-J-10K
- 10/27/2021 v7 (old)
Patrick Schüdzig