关于摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Fusion 的结论
摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Fusion 再次成为一款价格相对低廉、做工精良、设计精美的智能手机,并有多种 Pantone 颜色可供选择。至于你是否喜欢这款手机再次喷上摩托罗拉标志性的香味,这只是一个品味问题。
与上一代产品相比,该机型有了一些改进:用户可以期待更好的性能、更强的防水性和更长的电池续航时间。同时,这款手机只重了几克。
其功能包括 eSIM 支持、NFC 和 8 GB RAM,还算不错。不过,令人失望的地方也在所难免:虽然该手机终于支持 WiFi 6,但每个方向只有一根天线,速度上完全没有优势。它的 USB 2.0 端口没有将图像输出到显示器的有线选项,这在这个价位的手机中并不罕见,但摩托罗拉本可以在这方面从竞争中脱颖而出。
它的更新承诺是可靠的,但跟不上三星的竞争步伐。它的定位服务足够准确,支持多种移动网络和蓝牙音频编解码器,此外,它还有一个不错的照相系统和相当不错的扬声器。
总之,这是一款非常可靠、有吸引力的中端手机,其高性能和良好的电池续航能力给人留下了深刻印象。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
在撰写本文时,摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Fusion 尚未在美国发售。在欧洲,它的最高售价为 329 欧元(约合 340 美元)。
Table of Contents
- 关于摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Fusion 的结论
- 规格
- 表壳 - 采用 Pantone 颜色的橡胶背壳
- 连接性 - 包括 eSIM 支持
- 软件 - 平均更新承诺
- 通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 尽管有 WiFi 6,速度还是很慢
- 电话功能和通话质量 - 通话清晰
- 照相机 - 灵活性较差,但照片质量好
- 附件和保修 - 包括保护套
- 输入设备和操作 - 快速触摸屏
- 显示屏 - 明亮的 OLED
- 表现 - 在班级中表现良好
- 游戏 - 有时可达到 60fps
- 排放 - Edge 60 Fusion 几乎没有任何节气门
- 电池寿命 - 持续时间稍长
- Notebookcheck 总评分
- Possible alternatives compared
规格
表壳 - 采用 Pantone 颜色的橡胶背壳
与前代产品相比,该机外壳上的光亮材料已成为过去:摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Fusion 背面完全由橡胶塑料制成,同时也覆盖了摄像头模块。摄像头模块再次与机壳优雅地融为一体,两侧略带弧度。
背面有三种 Pantone 颜色可供选择,边框也与颜色相匹配:Slipstream(深沉而略带柔和的蓝色)、Zephry(淡粉色)和Amazonite(浅蓝绿色)。一些零售商还提供一种名为摩卡慕斯(Mocha Mousse)的颜色,略带红棕色调。
屏幕玻璃采用了大猩猩玻璃 7i,这是专门为中端手机设计的:它不像大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 那样具有很强的保护性,但至少能确保手机通过 MIL-STD 测试。现在,它还能承受 IP69 标准的高压水。由于通过了 IP68 认证,您还可以在多尘环境中使用手机或将其浸入淡水中。
手机四面的边缘都采用了玻璃材质,使手机的边框显得更窄,从而给人一种优雅的感觉。虽然整体上几乎看不出材质的过渡,但背面的过渡并不完全均匀。手机具有抗压性,但当你试图扭动它时,它会发出嘎吱嘎吱的响声。
摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Fusion 就其尺寸而言非常轻巧。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
连接性 - 包括 eSIM 支持
在进行测试的欧洲,只有配备 8GB 内存和 256GB UFS 2.2 存储空间的版本。在亚洲,也有配备 12GB 内存的版本。
在内部,其 USB-C 端口只能通过 USB 2.0 标准连接,因此无法控制显示器。数据传输速度也相对较慢。
它配备了 NFC 功能,因此您可以轻松使用移动支付服务,或使用配备 NFC 芯片的身份证在相应的应用程序中验证自己的身份。
虽然 Edge 60 Fusion 只有一个 nano SIM 卡插槽,但你可以设置 eSIM 配置文件,这样就可以同时使用两张 SIM 卡。
microSD 读卡器
手机存储空间可通过 microSD 卡扩展。我们使用 Angelbird V60 参考卡对读卡器进行了测试。
在复制测试中,Edge 60 Fusion 的传输速率相当稳定,平均读取速度也不错。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (Angelbird V60) | |
Motorola Moto G85 (Angelbird V60) | |
Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=74, last 2 years) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
软件 - 平均更新承诺
Android Edge 60 Fusion 预装了 15 个安全更新版本,制造商只是对谷歌的操作系统稍作改动,并将自身功能外包给独立的应用程序,以便更方便地进行更新。
在 2029 年 3 月(即 18 之前),这款智能手机将获得 4 年的安全更新和 3 个新的 版本。这是一个不错的承诺,尽管在这个价位的手机中,三星的 6 年更新期遥遥领先。
有些第三方应用程序是出于广告目的而预装的,但很容易删除。更令人讨厌的是,在设置过程中,用户会被要求安装其他应用程序。此外,用户界面的设计也会让你误点击并安装应用程序,这对用户来说并不友好。
在测试时,最新的安全补丁是从 2025 年 3 月开始的,仍在制造商承诺的 2 个月更新周期内。Android Android
可持续性
摩托罗拉选择了印有大豆油墨的纯白色包装盒。手机包装不含任何塑料。不过,它确实采用了闪亮效果的印刷,可能不太环保。令人欣慰的是,摩托罗拉使用了可回收塑料制作手机的保险杠。
我们找不到关于其确切二氧化碳排放量的报告,也找不到关于该设备所用材料的报告。
摩托罗拉与 iFixit 合作,提供自修和备件服务,你可以在这里找到备件--尽管只适用于旧款手机。在线零售商的情况也是如此,他们更有可能为至少 2 年机龄的手机提供备件。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 尽管有 WiFi 6,速度还是很慢
这款智能手机支持 WiFi 6 标准,但只有一个接收通道和一个发射通道(1x1 MIMO)。因此,其传输速率仅略高于使用 WiFi 5 的设备,在我们的测试中大约为 320-400 MBit/s。这对于日常使用来说已经足够,但如果你想充分利用千兆网络连接,你就会被冷落。
在靠近路由器的地方可以完全接收信号--即使是大型网站,加载速度也相当快。在 10 米远的地方,隔着 3 面墙,手机的信号强度仍然只有一半,网站加载速度也会变慢。
5G 是目前最快的移动通信标准。它支持多种 LTE 和 5G 频率,因此您可以毫不犹豫地将手机带到国外,而且很有可能在当地的移动网络上使用。在测试期间,我们监测了它的信号接收情况,并将其与高端手机进行了比较。这款手机的表现相当不错,信号强度与更昂贵的手机相差无几。
Networking | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Motorola Moto G85 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
电话功能和通话质量 - 通话清晰
摩托罗拉使用标准的Android 应用程序拨打电话,因此从许多其他品牌手机转到这款手机后,应该很容易找到使用方法。
该设备通过听筒的通话质量非常清晰,在我们的测试中,麦克风能可靠地接收到我们的声音,并不受干扰地转发给对方。通过免提麦克风和扬声器通话的声音也很清晰,但需要注意说话声音不要太小。
照相机 - 灵活性较差,但照片质量好
与前代产品一样,Edge 60 Fusion 配备了 5000 万像素主摄像头。其照片色彩鲜艳、清晰锐利,能够很好地再现光线氛围。即使在弱光和高对比度环境下,该手机也能可靠地工作,清晰度和动态范围都不错。
不过,与更昂贵的手机相比,它缺少真正的变焦镜头或至少是长焦镜头。这使得该系统在图像合成方面略显不够灵活。
4K 视频的录制速度最高可达 30 fps。在这里,画面看起来也非常清晰,自动对焦反应迅速,几乎无影无踪。
手机的广角摄像头分辨率为 1300 万像素,拍摄的照片细节适中,整体看起来不错,也能很好地捕捉光线氛围。
此外,自拍照片的质量也同样很高,不过我们注意到在暗处的动态效果略显不足。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low lightWide-angle camera在我们的实验室中,测试照片的清晰度适中,并有轻微偏红。不过,对比度非常好,即使是小文字也很容易阅读。相机的色彩还原有点过暗,但总体而言,还是呈现得很好。
在光线非常暗的情况下,主体的粗略细节仍然清晰可辨。


附件和保修 - 包括保护套
摩托罗拉没有随手机提供充电器,但提供了一个硬塑料保护盖。包装盒内还有一根 USB-C 数据线和一个 SIM 卡工具。
这款手机在美国享有 12 个月的保修服务。
输入设备和操作 - 快速触摸屏
显示屏 - 明亮的 OLED
|
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 1281 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.47 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.062
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion P-OLED, 2712x1200, 6.7" | Motorola Edge 50 Fusion P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | Motorola Moto G85 P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A56 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 12% | 8% | 7% | -6% | |
Brightness middle | 1281 | 1213 -5% | 1138 -11% | 1207 -6% | 1184 -8% |
Brightness | 1281 | 1190 -7% | 1137 -11% | 1177 -8% | 1179 -8% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 93 -1% | 97 3% | 94 0% | 99 5% |
Black Level * | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.47 | 1.36 7% | 1.1 25% | 1.36 7% | 1.7 -16% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.14 | 2.3 27% | 2.6 17% | 2.8 11% | 3.2 -2% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 1.1 50% | 1.6 27% | 1.4 36% | 2.4 -9% |
Gamma | 2.062 107% | 2.254 98% | 2.23 99% | 2.23 99% | 2.12 104% |
CCT | 6628 98% | 6624 98% | 6284 103% | 6591 99% | 6544 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 716.2 Hz Amplitude: 45 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 716.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 716.2 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8460 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise | |
↘ 0.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.8 ms rise | |
↘ 0.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms). |
表现 - 在班级中表现良好
摩托罗拉选择了一款相当现代的中端 SoC,其外形为 联发科 Dimensity 7300的联发科 Dimensity 7300 小米Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G该芯片也用于小米 14 Pro 5G。因此,它比前一代产品 Edge 50 Fusion 性能更强。 Edge 50 Fusion在大多数基准测试中都名列前茅。
Edge 60 Fusion 通常运行流畅,只有同时运行多个应用程序或执行要求非常高的任务时才会出现等待时间。
在人工智能计算方面,这款 SoC 对于经济实惠的中端产品来说也表现出色。
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (8087 - 27964, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=149, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
Geekbench AI | |
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3 | |
Average of class Smartphone (231 - 1106, n=4, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (n=1) | |
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3 | |
Average of class Smartphone (231 - 4555, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (n=1) | |
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3 | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (n=1) | |
Average of class Smartphone (536 - 4549, n=5, last 2 years) |
AI Benchmark - Score V6 | |
Average of class Smartphone (68.9 - 12578, n=42, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (232 - 577, n=4) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G |
在图形处理性能方面,用户可以从 2025 年这个价位的手机中获得他们所期望的性能,但也不过如此。
因此,Edge 60 Fusion 可以运行大多数应用程序。不过,如果你想执行要求非常高的任务,你可能需要寻找功能更强大的设备。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
网站加载速度相当快,图片一般很快就会出现。虽然有时会有短暂的等待时间,但总的来说,使用摩托罗拉手机上网是一种流畅而愉快的体验。
Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (56.4 - 339, n=8, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (Chrome 135) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (n=1) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134) | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (Chrome 135) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (76.5 - 130, n=4) | |
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133) |
Speedometer 3.0 - Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (Chrome 135) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (5.6 - 8.19, n=5) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126) | |
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134) | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=159, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (Chrome 135) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (56 - 118, n=5) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133) | |
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=208, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (Chrome 135) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126) | |
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (22739 - 37949, n=7) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (1066 - 2154, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=168, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133) | |
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (Chrome 135) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134) |
* ... smaller is better
虽然该设备的 UFS 2.2 存储并不是目前速度最快的模块之一,但在复制时,加载时间和传输速度都相当短。
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | Motorola Moto G85 | Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -6% | -5% | -31% | -14% | 53% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 967.4 | 967.8 0% | 1009.67 4% | 529.8 -45% | 905 ? -6% | 2041 ? 111% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 908.8 | 800.5 -12% | 833.64 -8% | 525.3 -42% | 725 ? -20% | 1660 ? 83% |
Random Read 4KB | 272.1 | 281.5 3% | 248.81 -9% | 220.7 -19% | 231 ? -15% | 284 ? 4% |
Random Write 4KB | 286.9 | 241.4 -16% | 266.92 -7% | 237 -17% | 241 ? -16% | 328 ? 14% |
游戏 - 有时可达到 60fps
在玩游戏时,你不应该选择要求太高的游戏,或者至少只玩低细节的游戏。
我们注意到,例如在运行《PUBG Mobile》时,在非常低的设置下也能达到相对稳定的 60fps。而在玩《源氏冲击》时,即使在最低设置下也只能达到 30fps,不排除出现卡顿的可能。
我们使用GameBench软件进行测量。
排放 - Edge 60 Fusion 几乎没有任何节气门
温度
我们对手机进行了较长时间的满负荷运行,以观察其外壳温度的变化情况。我们注意到的最高温升实际上低于前代 Edge 50 Fusion,最高温度为 42.4 °C。虽然这一点很明显,但绝不是问题。
我们的测试设备在 3DMark 压力测试中表现同样出色,即使在多次运行基准测试后也没有出现节流现象。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad stress test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G |
发言人
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 - 持续时间稍长
耗电量
乍一看,Edge 60 Fusion 的能耗与传统智能手机无异,但实际上它的耗电量非常低,尤其是在满负荷运行的情况下。
虽然没有配备充电器,但它的最大充电功率为 68 瓦。不过,在我们的测试实验室里,这款手机与充电器配合得很好,使用功率适当的充电器完全充电只需不到一个小时。
这款中档手机不支持无线充电。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion 5200 mAh | Motorola Edge 50 Fusion 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 5110 mAh | Motorola Moto G85 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A56 5G 5000 mAh | Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -33% | -17% | -4% | -70% | -7% | -45% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1 | 1 -0% | 1.17 -17% | 1 -0% | 0.72 28% | 0.938 ? 6% | 0.875 ? 12% |
Idle Average * | 1.3 | 1.3 -0% | 1.38 -6% | 1.2 8% | 1.45 -12% | 1.368 ? -5% | 1.443 ? -11% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.6 | 1.9 -19% | 1.41 12% | 1.4 12% | 1.49 7% | 1.497 ? 6% | 1.583 ? 1% |
Load Average * | 2.9 | 5.1 -76% | 3.58 -23% | 3.4 -17% | 9.68 -234% | 3.18 ? -10% | 6.99 ? -141% |
Load Maximum * | 5.6 | 9.4 -68% | 8.44 -51% | 6.8 -21% | 13.39 -139% | 7.26 ? -30% | 10.5 ? -88% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
运行时间
与上一代产品相比,这款手机的电池容量略有增大,现在可以提供 5,200 毫安时的电量。它的续航时间也相应增加,尤其是在负载情况下,现在的续航时间长达 5:29 小时,因此我们可以向经常移动的高强度游戏玩家推荐这款手机。
在日常生活的正常使用中,您可以期待两天不需要电源插座,或者在沙发上使用手机一天而不需要伸手去拿充电线。
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion 5200 mAh | Motorola Edge 50 Fusion 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 5110 mAh | Motorola Moto G85 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A56 5G 5000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -5% | 1% | -8% | ||
Reader / Idle | 1966 | 1874 -5% | 1754 -11% | 1974 0% | |
H.264 | 1161 | 1158 0% | 1423 23% | 1114 -4% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 1023 | 966 -6% | 1206 18% | 894 -13% | |
Load | 329 | 297 -10% | 236 -28% | 286 -13% |
Notebookcheck 总评分

Edge 60 Fusion 是一款非常时尚的中端手机,拥有出色的摄像头。
与上一代产品相比,它的电池续航时间和性能都有所提高。
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
- 04/26/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
Possible alternatives compared
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $8.99 QWFORQW [2+2 Pack for Motoro... 2. $7.99 Anoowkoa 2 pack for Moto Edg... 3. $9.99 Fast Charger Type C 25W USB ... List Price: 329€ | 178 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2712x1200 445 PPI P-OLED | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $8.58 LXEEOLX [2 Pack Ultra High D... 2. $7.59 Aiziki 2 Pack Screen Protect... 3. $13.99 Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ... List Price: 399€ | 175 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.70" 2400x1080 393 PPI P-OLED | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $6.99 Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr... 2. $7.99 Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr... 3. $11.99 Ibywind Screen Protector For... List Price: 400€ | 190 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI AMOLED | |
Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 619 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: $249.50 List Price: 349€ | 171 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2400x1080 405 PPI P-OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G Samsung Exynos 1580 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 540 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB | Amazon: 1. $6.99 Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design... 2. $6.95 NEW'C 3 Pack Designed for Sa... 3. $4.99 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... List Price: 479€ | 198 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI Super AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.