Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 评测--面向低价购物者的功能型智能手机

Name: Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Brand: Xiaomi

双胞胎成了问题。

Redmi Note 14 Pro 是一款经济实惠的中端手机，具有这个价位少有的高端功能。不过，小米也做出了一些妥协。在我们的评测中，您将发现它的优点和不足。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 02/17/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone

判决

手持Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 时，它给人的感觉更像是一款高端中端设备，而非其规格所显示的那样。坚固的外壳、窄显示屏边框和康宁旗舰保护玻璃在价格实惠的Android 手机中非常罕见。它在显示屏、扬声器和电池续航时间等关键的日常使用领域也表现出色。

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

不过，那些追求高性能和快速存储的人可能会很快将目光转向别处，因为Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 在这些方面都有不足。

几乎一模一样的孪生兄弟 Poco X7 明显更便宜，这不禁让人产生疑问：为什么选择 Note 14 Pro 而不是 Poco X7？为什么选择 Note 14 Pro 而不是 Poco？200 万像素的摄像头系统也没有提供强有力的理由--至少在 HyperOS 1.0 的当前状态下，照片质量仍然令人失望。

Pros

+ 明亮的 OLED 面板，带 PWM 调光功能

+ 运行时间长

+ 坚固的外壳

+ 良好的扬声器

+ 性能稳定

Cons

- ......但就该价格范围而言，SoC 太逊了

- 无线局域网速度慢

- 只有 USB 2.0

- Android 14

- 更新保证期可以更长

价格和供应情况

Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 基本型号（8GB 内存、256GB 存储）的零售价为 400 美元，而顶级型号（12GB 内存、512GB 存储）的零售价为 450 美元。不过，上市仅几周后，市面价格已降至 300 美元左右，包括美国亚马逊网站和小米德国店。

$287.50

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G + 4G Lte (for Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (256Gb + 8Gb) 6.67 200Mp Triple Global Bands Unlocked (Midnight Black Global)

$7.29
Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Protector for Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G with Camera Lens Protector,3D Full Coverage HD Clear Scratch Resistant,Bubble-Free for Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro Plus 5G Screen Protector
$6.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G/Redmi Note 14 Pro Plus 5G Screen Protector with Camera Lens Protector, 9H Hardness Anti-Scratch Tempered Glass flim, Case Friendly,

可能的替代品比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 77.8%	Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1	Amazon: 1. $287.50 Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ... 2. $7.29 Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr... 3. $6.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi Redmi Not... List Price: 400€	190 g	256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI AMOLED
2. 77.7%	Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1	Amazon: 1. $8.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco X7 P... 2. $7.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco X7 P... 3. $8.99 Fhyeugfy for Xiaomi POCO X7 ...	185.5 g	512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI AMOLED
3. 74.7%	Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 619 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1	Amazon: $240.00 List Price: 349€	171 g	256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.67" 2400x1080 405 PPI P-OLED
4. 79.9%	Nothing Phone (2a) Plus MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G ⎘ ARM Mali-G610 MP4 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	List Price: 429€	190 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70" 2400x1080 393 PPI AMOLED
5. 85.9% ^{v7 (old)}	Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380 ⎘ ARM Mali-G68 MP5 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1	Amazon: 1. $6.99 Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design... 2. $4.99 Mr.Shield Screen Protector C... 3. $9.99 Samsung Charger Fast Chargin... List Price: 379€	209 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.60" 2340x1080 390 PPI Super AMOLED
6. 85.8% ^{v7 (old)}	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1	Amazon: 1. $287.50 Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ... 2. $334.99 Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ... 3. $6.85 beukei (3 Pack) Compatible f... List Price: 399€	187 g	256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI AMOLED

判决
Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 的规格
手机壳 - IP 等级的小米智能手机
功能 -Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G，带 USB 2.0
软件 - 小米手机仍运行Android 14
通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 仅配备 WiFi 6
手机功能和语音质量 -Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G，带 eSIM 卡
摄像头 - 配备 2 亿像素的小米手机
配件和保修 - 不含电源适配器的小米智能手机
输入设备和操作 -Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G，带面部解锁功能
显示屏 -Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 配备 OLED 显示屏
性能 - 小米手机采用联发科技术
游戏 - 小米智能手机只能达到 60 帧/秒
排放 -Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 几乎不节流
电池续航时间 - 小米智能手机充电速度不快不慢
Notebookcheck 总体评分

通过Redmi Note 14 Pro，小米再次将中端智能手机推向高端市场。

该机的主要卖点是这个价位少有的功能，包括 200 万像素摄像头、超亮 3000 尼特 AMOLED 显示屏以及坚固耐用的外壳。联发科 Dimensity 7300Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 有 8 GB 或 12 GB 内存和 256 GB 或 512 GB 存储空间两种配置。

Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 的规格

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Redmi Note 14 Series)

Processor

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 8 x 2 - 2.5 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G615 MP2

Memory

8 GB

, LPDD4x

Display

6.67 inch 20:9, 2712 x 1220 pixel 446 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB

, 227 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity, OTG, Miracast, eSIM

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n28/n38/n40/n41/n48/n66/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.55 x 162.33 x 74.42

Battery

5110 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 14

Camera

Primary Camera: 200 MPix (f/1.65, IOS, Videos @2160p/30fps) + 8 MPix (f/2.2, wide angle lens) + 2 MPix (f/2.4, macro lens), camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (FF, f/2.2)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, case, USB cable, info material, HyperOS 1.0, 12 Months Warranty, SAR valu: 0.994W/kg Head, 0.992W/kg Body; Widevine L1, GNSS: Beidou: B1I｜GPS: L1｜Galileo: E1 | GLONASS: G1｜QZSS: L1, SBAS, BT-Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LHDC V5, HDR: Dolby Vision, HDR10, HDR10+, HLG, fanless, waterproof

Weight

190 g, Power Supply: 87 g

Price

400 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

手机壳 - IP 等级的小米智能手机

Redmi Note 14 Pro 的目标是在同价位产品中树立新的耐用性标准。它采用 IP68 防水外壳，还能防止灰尘进入。根据小米公司的说法，这款手机的设计特别坚固，采用铝复合框架和钢强化结构，增强了抗冲击性。

小米还加入了吸能泡沫和聚合物缓冲材料，以进一步保护显示屏。这些材料可以起到减震作用，降低屏幕碎裂的风险。屏幕本身占据了手机正面约 89% 的面积，对于一款经济实惠的中端设备来说，这个比例堪称顶级。相比之下 Galaxy A35和 Nothing Phone 2a Plus

在美国，Redmi Note 14 Pro 有三种颜色可供选择。我们的测试样品采用了 PU 皮革外观，而另外两种则采用了粗糙的塑料背壳。这种表面处理在视觉上很吸引人，背面的人造革也不会给人廉价的感觉。

测试Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 智能手机（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）

尺寸比较

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Xiaomi Poco X7 Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Motorola Moto G85 Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G DIN A6 ❌

功能 -Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G，带 USB 2.0

Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 为中端智能手机提供了令人印象深刻的功能。它支持杜比视界（Dolby Vision）、用于非接触式支付的 NFC 芯片、Miracast、红外爆破器和蓝牙 5.4，并支持索尼的 LDAC 和 LHDC 编解码器。不过，与 Note 13 Pro取消了 3.5 毫米耳机插孔，存储规格保持不变。小米仍然依赖 UFS 2.2 和 LPDDR4X，尽管 Dimensity 7300 的

该手机还因其缓慢的 USB 2.0 标准而落后于高端设备，不支持有线图像输出。不过，USB OTG 是可用的。在我们使用三星 980 Pro NVMe M.2 固态硬盘进行的文件传输测试中，USB 端口的传输速度仅为 30 MB/s。好的一面是，Note 14 Pro 5G 兼容 exFAT 和 NTFS 文件系统，为基于微软的系统提供了更多便利。

软件 - 小米手机仍运行Android 14

Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 将获得为期四年的安全更新，操作系统升级最高可达Android 17。在测试时，该设备运行Android 14 与 HyperOS 1.09。

安全补丁是从 2025 年 1 月开始的，但红米手机的更新速度和可靠性历来不稳定。从 2025 年 2 月开始，OTA 更新将带来Android 15，包括 AI Bokeh、AI Film 和 AI Erase Pro 等 AI 驱动的照片和视频增强功能。此外，Android 14 设置菜单中没有小米互联功能。

可持续性

小米公司没有提供有关所用材料、回收率或智能手机在其生命周期内二氧化碳排放量的详细信息。

该公司声称已增加了对回收材料的使用，包括铝、金、镍、钴、镍、镍合金、镍镉和镍氢电池。该公司声称已在其所有智能手机中增加使用回收材料，包括铝、金和铜。此外，该公司还提倡使用生物基高分子材料和从废弃渔网中回收的塑料，以减少对环境的影响。不过，这些可持续发展声明并不特别适用于Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 仅配备 WiFi 6

在连接方面，Note 14 Pro 5G 并不完全面向未来。由于 WiFi 6 标准不支持快速的 6 GHz 频段，而且只有一个接收和发射信道（1x1 MIMO），小米手机的传输速率相当慢。在使用参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 进行的测试中，我们的峰值速度仅为 400 MBit/s。不过，数据传输速率基本稳定。

这款中端手机可以访问采用 5G 标准的移动数据网络，前提是此类网络可用；支持多个频段。4G 网络的频段配置对中端手机也很有吸引力，与英语国家有关的所有频率均可使用。Note 14 Pro 5G 甚至还配备了 21 个 LTE 频段，足以满足在国外逗留的需求。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	976 (949^min - 996^max) MBit/s +144%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (305 - 1757, n=129)	861 MBit/s +115%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	834 (780^min - 913^max) MBit/s +109%
Average of class Smartphone (49.8 - 1801, n=183, last 2 years)	711 MBit/s +78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	678 (544^min - 711^max) MBit/s +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	400 (196^min - 413^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Poco X7 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	398 (193^min - 410^max) MBit/s 0%
Motorola Moto G85 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	361 (316^min, 320.06^P1 - 373^max) MBit/s -10%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	866 (728^min - 921^max) MBit/s +131%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	830 (758^min - 851^max) MBit/s +121%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (234 - 1696, n=127)	825 MBit/s +120%
Average of class Smartphone (52 - 1857, n=181, last 2 years)	694 MBit/s +85%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	581 (491^min - 618^max) MBit/s +55%
Xiaomi Poco X7 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	377 (187^min - 380^max) MBit/s +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	375 (361^min - 380^max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G85 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	341 (322^min, 323.74^P1 - 347^max) MBit/s -9%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone (521 - 1945, n=76, last 2 years)	1429 MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (614 - 1902, n=20)	1286 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	946 (497^min - 1015^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone (451 - 1864, n=76, last 2 years)	1363 MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (666 - 1816, n=22)	1202 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	928 (893^min - 940^max) MBit/s

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø393 (196-413)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø678 (544-711)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø374 (361-380)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø580 (491-618)

为了测试定位精度，我们带着 Note 14 Pro 5G 走了一段路，并将其结果与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。手机的定位精度为一米，但沿途会出现一些明显的偏差。由于 Note 14 Pro 5G 依靠单频 GNSS，它偶尔会缩短路径，尤其是在改变方向时。尽管如此，这款手机在执行一般导航任务时仍然非常可靠。

手机功能和语音质量 -Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G，带 eSIM 卡

Note 14 Pro 5G 能提供自然的语音质量，并能有效抑制环境噪音，但在处理非常响亮或高频率的噪音时仍有困难。它支持两张实体 nano-SIM 卡或一张 eSIM 卡，可实现双卡功能。该设备还提供 VoWiFi 和 VoLTE 等功能。

摄像头 - 配备 2 亿像素的小米手机

2000 万像素前置摄像头虽然分辨率较高，但缺乏像素分档功能，在日常使用中也能捕捉到细节丰富的照片。即使在阳光直射下，HDR 处理和曝光调整也表现出色。不过，由于没有自动对焦功能，也没有 4K 视频录制选项，Note 14 Pro 自拍相机的整体体验略有下降。

在中端机型中，200 万像素的三星 ISOCELL HP3 传感器是一大亮点。在Redmi Note 14 Pro 中，这个 1/1.4 英寸的传感器默认使用 16 合 1 像素分档，以补偿其仅 0.56 微米的小原生像素尺寸。

光学防抖主摄像头在日光下能捕捉到较多的细节，但图像往往显得过于锐利。边缘的清晰度和色彩饱和度，尤其是绿色和蓝色色调，都不理想。

200 万像素 ISOCELL HP3 传感器的一个优点是无需专用长焦镜头即可实现 2 倍和 4 倍变焦。不过，传感器裁剪仅在光线条件非常好的情况下有效。800 万像素超广角摄像头也有同样的限制，即使在白天也会出现明显的图像失真。色彩还原和动态范围也有欠缺，而且固定焦距使其无法用于特写拍摄，因此 200 万像素微距传感器成为微距拍摄的唯一选择。

主摄像头的视频录制仅限于 4K 分辨率，最高 30 fps。虽然图像质量不错，自动对焦性能可靠，但在录制过程中，即使在 1080p 模式下，也无法在主镜头和超广角镜头之间切换，这就要求用户在拍摄前选择自己喜欢的镜头。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main sensor Main sensor Ultra wide angle Low Light Zoom 5x

click to load images

Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G

Honor Magic 7 Pro

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G

Honor Magic 7 Pro

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G

Honor Magic 7 Pro

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G

Honor Magic 7 Pro

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G

Honor Magic 7 Pro

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

Canon EOS 90D

在受控照明条件下，我们将 200 万像素主摄像头的色彩还原能力与实际参考色彩进行比较分析。Note 14 Pro 5G 表现出典型的智能手机图像增亮倾向，某些色调有明显偏差。虽然对于一款中端设备来说，相机软件总体上保持了令人满意的色彩准确度，但在 ColorChecker Passport 测试中，色彩保真度的一些明显异常值（偏差超过 15）也是显而易见的。

ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G: 9.38 ∆E min: 2.83 - max: 20.3 ∆E

配件和保修 - 不含电源适配器的小米智能手机

在我们进行测试的德国，Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 随附一个保护套（黑色）、一个用于弹出 SIM 卡的工具、一本用户手册（包括保修信息）、一张预装保护膜和一根数据线。

保修保修期保修期为 12 个月。在制造商商店购买时，还可附加小米自家的意外损坏和意外损坏+盗窃 Care（44 欧元起）。

输入设备和操作 -Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G，带面部解锁功能

6.67 英寸 CrystalRes AMOLED 显示屏上的输入信号都能准确记录，即使是触摸屏的边缘也不例外。由于刷新率高达 120 Hz，Note 14 Pro 5G 在日常使用中基本能提供流畅的性能，使动画看起来非常流畅。

OLED 面板的采样率高达 480 Hz，确保了对触摸输入的快速响应。在游戏模式下，小米声称它可以达到 2,560 Hz，这意味着触摸屏每秒刷新高达 2,560 次。由 X 轴线性振动电机提供的触觉反馈非常精确，在这个价位的手机中非常突出。

在生物识别解锁方面，这款手机配备了一个显示屏内指纹传感器，最多可支持五个手指。在测试中，光学指纹识别工作可靠，从待机状态唤醒显示屏的延迟极小，不过如果定位稍高一些就更好了。该设备还包括使用前置摄像头的基于人工智能的人脸识别功能，但由于它依赖于 2D 成像，因此缺乏安全验证功能。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 -Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 配备 OLED 显示屏

OLED 显示屏基于 RG/BG 子像素矩阵，由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色发光二极管组成。

Note 14 Pro 5G 的 12 位面板分辨率为 1220p，宽高比为 20:9，像素密度为 446PPI，在同尺寸产品中足够清晰。刷新率不能动态调节，但用户可以在 120 Hz 和 60 Hz 之间手动切换。

在我们的测量中，Note 14 Pro 5G 没有创造亮度记录，但作为一款中端设备，它的表现仍然不错。在激活环境光传感器并显示纯白图像的情况下，我们记录到的亮度为 1,154 cd/m²，与小米宣称的 1,200 尼特（HBM）一致。当显示明暗混合区域（APL18 模式）时，亮度仍为 1,140 cd/m²。虽然我们没有达到宣传的 3,000 尼特峰值亮度，但在播放 HDR 内容时，Note 14 Pro 5G 的亮度仍然达到了 2,510 cd/m²。

，小米的显示器来自多个供应商，包括 CSOT、天马和维信诺，因此不同生产批次之间可能存在细微差异。


1133 cd/m²	1131 cd/m²	1152 cd/m²
1140 cd/m²	1138 cd/m²	1154 cd/m²
1132 cd/m²	1127 cd/m²	1124 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1154 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1136.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.98 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1138 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"	Xiaomi Poco X7 AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"	Motorola Moto G85 P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Nothing Phone (2a) Plus AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen		-3%	-2%	-26%	-30%	-25%
Brightness middle	1138	1156 2%	1207 6%	1034 -9%	904 -21%	1205 6%
Brightness	1137	1150 1%	1177 4%	1038 -9%	912 -20%	1177 4%
Brightness Distribution	97	98 1%	94 -3%	96 -1%	97 0%	90 -7%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.1	1.1 -0%	1.36 -24%	1.8 -64%	2.1 -91%	1.51 -37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.6	3.1 -19%	2.8 -8%	3.9 -50%	2.8 -8%	4.07 -57%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.6	1.6 -0%	1.4 12%	2 -25%	2.2 -38%	2.5 -56%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.22 ^99%	2.23 ^99%	2.23 ^99%	2.1 ^105%	2.175 ^101%
CCT	6284 ^103%	6304 ^103%	6591 ^99%	6803 ^96%	6478 ^100%	6407 ^101%

* ... smaller is better

OLED 屏幕使用的 PWM 流程可能会给敏感用户带来不适，导致疲劳、眼睛疲劳或因屏幕闪烁而头痛。为了减轻这些影响，小米在 Note 14 Pro 5G 中采用了 1,920 Hz 的高频 PWM 调光技术，我们的测量结果也证实了这一点。

这款小米手机还获得了德国莱茵 TÜV 的三重认证，包括无闪烁运行、昼夜节律友好型照明和低蓝光辐射。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz
Amplitude: 15 %
Secondary Frequency: 1851 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8619 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

以固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置进行了一系列测量。最低亮度时的振幅曲线看似平坦，但这是由于缩放造成的。信息框提供了最小亮度时振幅的放大视图，以便进行更详细的分析。

HyperOS 为显示器提供了广泛的自定义选项，允许用户从三种色彩配置文件中进行选择，调整白平衡，并根据环境光线调整色温。在我们的测试中，"专业 "配置文件通过精确控制 P3 色彩空间实现了最精确的校准。Note 14 Pro 5G 的灰度和色彩精确度都显示出非常低的 DeltaE 值，与参考数据相比差异极小。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.7025 ms rise
1.28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.576 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.53 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.8075 ms rise
1.53 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.724 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms).

AMOLED 屏幕即使在浅视角下也能保持良好的色彩稳定性。虽然有一些亮度损失，但仍然很小。由于亮度高、对比度强，Note 14 Pro 5G 在户外很容易阅读，其亮度储备足以应对夏季的明亮环境。在冬季照明条件下，虽然显示屏的弧形边缘仍会产生一些明显的反光，但反光并不会对可读性产生重大影响。

性能 - 小米手机采用联发科技术

Note 14 Pro 5G 配备了 Dimensity 7300处理器，采用 4nm 工艺制造，但其性能在这个价位的手机中并不出众。在我们的基准测试中，这款中端手机的成绩一般，联发科处理器的 Cortex-A78 内核在 Geekbench 多核测试中表现尤为挣扎。

。 Poco X7 Pro配备了 Dimensity 8400的性能要好得多。即使是骁龙 7s 第二代的 Note 13 Pro 5G的性能也只是略逊于 Dimensity 7300。此外，联发科的 SoC 在人工智能基准测试中并不突出，因此对于注重性能的用户来说，它并不是一个令人信服的选择。
。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288	1598 Points +53%
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3479, n=186, last 2 years)	1496 Points +43%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	1221 Points +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	1043 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	1030 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192	1029 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144	1017 Points -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (541 - 1054, n=7)	966 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288	940 Points -10%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288	6239 Points +116%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 10401, n=186, last 2 years)	4228 Points +46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192	2955 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	2908 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144	2906 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	2891 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (1906 - 3098, n=7)	2765 Points -4%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	2678 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288	2067 Points -29%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288	1160 Points +43%
Average of class Smartphone (139 - 2437, n=168, last 2 years)	1059 Points +31%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	889 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	811 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (726 - 817, n=4)	788 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192	783 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144	783 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	726 Points -10%
Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288	703 Points -13%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288	5284 Points +77%
Average of class Smartphone (512 - 8816, n=168, last 2 years)	3555 Points +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	2989 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (2741 - 2989, n=4)	2890 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144	2778 Points -7%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	2741 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192	2678 Points -10%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	1922 Points -36%
Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288	1917 Points -36%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288	1695493 Points +168%
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3015111, n=122, last 2 years)	1299153 Points +106%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	765520 Points +21%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	665983 Points +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (598120 - 667282, n=6)	646043 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	631545 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144	602612 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192	566071 Points -10%
Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288	481436 Points -24%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288	14805 Points +10%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	13701 Points +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (11724 - 15834, n=6)	13689 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 27169, n=192, last 2 years)	13528 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144	13430 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	13421 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	13406 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192	12967 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288	12367 Points -8%

CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288	1287 Points +82%
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2674, n=164, last 2 years)	945 Points +33%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	759 Points +7%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	751 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	709 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (390 - 759, n=5)	658 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144	647 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288	619 Points -13%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288	8278 Points +66%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 13729, n=158, last 2 years)	6549 Points +31%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	5192 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192	5056 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	4983 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4432 - 4983, n=4)	4731 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	4725 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144	4416 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288	4147 Points -17%
System
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	10784 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192	10410 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 19891, n=158, last 2 years)	10362 Points -4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (8743 - 10784, n=4)	9323 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144	8843 Points -18%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	8774 Points -19%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288	8761 Points -19%
Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288	8686 Points -19%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	6847 Points -37%
Memory
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288	8484 Points +78%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)	7133 Points +50%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	5293 Points +11%
Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288	5162 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	4768 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	4732 Points -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4432 - 4837, n=4)	4692 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192	4595 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144	4301 Points -10%
Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288	36491 Points +323%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)	18465 Points +114%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	13376 Points +55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	8632 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (8564 - 8632, n=4)	8583 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	8570 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192	7168 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144	7040 Points -18%
Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288	4772 Points -45%
Web
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192	1905 Points +37%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288	1731 Points +25%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)	1586 Points +14%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	1453 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144	1421 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	1401 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	1387 Points
Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288	1382 Points 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (1130 - 1462, n=4)	1345 Points -3%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288	49010 Points +506%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	27837 Points +244%
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=149, last 2 years)	18068 Points +123%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (8087 - 27964, n=4)	17914 Points +122%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192	8618 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	8359 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	8087 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144	5987 Points -26%
Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288	5689 Points -30%

AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288	29244 Points
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=140, last 2 years)	25922 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ()	14587 Points
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	13748 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192	691 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144	545 Points
Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288	421 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	Points

AI Benchmark - Score V6
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288	5141 Points +2116%
Average of class Smartphone (68.9 - 10957, n=30, last 2 years)	3603 Points +1453%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (232 - 534, n=3)	333 Points +44%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	234 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	232 Points

产品 Dimensity 7300的图形处理器配备了 Mali-G615 MP2.在图形测试中，Note 14 Pro 5G 的表现优于 Nothing Phone (2a) Plus和 Galaxy A35 5G在图形测试中，Note 14 Pro 5G 的表现优于 Nothing Phone (2a) Plus 和 A35 5G，使其成为具有竞争力的选择。不过 Poco X7 Pro再次占据领先地位，在该类别的基准测试中独占鳌头。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Score | Solar Bay Score | Steel Nomad Light Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3691 Points +318%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1372 Points +55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	883 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	842 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	796 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	788 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G85 Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	410 Points -54%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3840 Points +341%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1388 Points +59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	871 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	846 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	809 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	800 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G85 Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	418 Points -52%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4789 Points +49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3211 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3141 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3039 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2820 Points -12%
Motorola Moto G85 Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1575 Points -51%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6358 Points
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1272 Points +242%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	523 Points +41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	372 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	344 Points -8%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6996 Points +28%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5641 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5468 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4391 Points -20%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4156 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3852 Points -30%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	20018 Points +286%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9887 Points +91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5455 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5220 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5187 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5118 Points -1%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14161 Points +168%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5308 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5287 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4993 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4936 Points -7%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1752 Points -67%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +40%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	94 fps +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	90 fps +5%
Motorola Moto G85 Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	88 fps +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	86 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	86 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -30%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	568 fps +385%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	166 fps +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	120 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	118 fps +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	117 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	115 fps -2%
Motorola Moto G85 Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	100 fps -15%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +94%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	68 fps +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	62 fps
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -3%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	60 fps -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	52 fps -16%
Motorola Moto G85 Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	45 fps -27%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	243 fps +193%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	106 fps +28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	83 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	81 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	79 fps -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	69 fps -17%
Motorola Moto G85 Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	51 fps -39%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps +190%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps +44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	54 fps +32%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	47 fps +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	41 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	39 fps -5%
Motorola Moto G85 Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	32 fps -22%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	199 fps +243%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	58 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	56 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	52 fps -10%
Motorola Moto G85 Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	36 fps -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	32 fps -45%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	91 fps +279%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	38 fps +58%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	24 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps -21%
Motorola Moto G85 Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps -21%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	122 fps +259%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	33 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	30 fps -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29 fps -15%
Motorola Moto G85 Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps -38%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	73 fps +306%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	35 fps +94%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	18 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps -17%
Motorola Moto G85 Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps -28%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	61 fps +259%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	24 fps +41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps -24%
Motorola Moto G85 Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.6 fps -49%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	108 fps +272%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	50 fps +72%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	30 fps +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	28 fps -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps -21%
Motorola Moto G85 Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps -28%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	153 fps +273%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	41 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps -17%
Motorola Moto G85 Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps -44%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	28 fps +278%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11 fps +49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.4 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.5 fps -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.8 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.8 fps -22%
Motorola Moto G85 Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.8 fps -49%

Note 14 Pro 5G 在浏览器基准测试中表现不佳，但在日常使用中，浏览速度仍然令人满意。复杂网页的加载时间不会过慢，滚动一般也很流畅。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (111.1 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)	128.4 Points +50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120)	117.292 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)	115.153 Points +35%
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127)	110.527 Points +29%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (Chrome 128)	105.736 Points +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)	85.453 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (60.2 - 108.5, n=4)	85.4 Points 0%

Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=82, last 2 years)	12.2 runs/min +86%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (Chrome 128)	10.1 runs/min +54%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (5.6 - 7.48, n=4)	6.63 runs/min +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)	6.56 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)	5.81 runs/min -11%
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127)	5.55 runs/min -15%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (Chrome 128)	127 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)	123 Points +28%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=158, last 2 years)	121.5 Points +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120)	115 Points +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)	96 Points
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127)	95 Points -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (56 - 118, n=4)	92.5 Points -4%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=206, last 2 years)	40353 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)	36010 Points +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120)	35379 Points +22%
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127)	34162 Points +18%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (Chrome 128)	33203 Points +15%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (22739 - 37949, n=6)	29365 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)	28945 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (1243 - 2154, n=4)	1515 ms * -12%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=166, last 2 years)	1481 ms * -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)	1351.21 ms *
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (Chrome 128)	1172.11 ms * +13%
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127)	1172 ms * +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120)	1170.6 ms * +13%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)	1099 ms * +19%

* ... smaller is better

Note 14 Pro 5G 的 UFS 存储系统性能稳定，但考虑到其 400 美元的价位，UFS 3.1 存储系统本应在意料之中。Dimensity 7300 SoC支持这一更快的标准，因此小米坚持使用 UFS 2.2 的决定有些令人失望。

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G	Motorola Moto G85	Nothing Phone (2a) Plus	Samsung Galaxy A35 5G	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G	Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-27%	17%	-49%	-8%	-11%	54%
Sequential Read 256KB	1009.67	529.8 -48%	1037.34 3%	529.32 -48%	946.8 -6%	904 ?(482 - 1023, n=39) -10%	1951 ?(269 - 4512, n=190, last 2 years) 93%
Sequential Write 256KB	833.64	525.3 -37%	954.87 15%	270 -68%	808.2 -3%	721 ?(369 - 913, n=39) -14%	1568 ?(94.2 - 4030, n=190, last 2 years) 88%
Random Read 4KB	248.81	220.7 -11%	298.12 20%	244.24 -2%	239.2 -4%	230 ?(99.7 - 291, n=39) -8%	280 ?(47.6 - 504, n=190, last 2 years) 13%
Random Write 4KB	266.92	237 -11%	345.83 30%	62.59 -77%	220.5 -17%	240 ?(99.2 - 319, n=39) -10%	321 ?(9.4 - 964, n=190, last 2 years) 20%

游戏 - 小米智能手机只能达到 60 帧/秒

除了基准测试结果，我们还测试了马里图形处理器的性能进行了测试。我们使用合作伙伴GameBench

在 Note 14 Pro 5G 上无法进行高帧率（HFR）游戏，但《PUBG Mobile》等轻量级游戏在低设置下也能以 60 FPS 的速度流畅运行。要求更高的游戏，如《源氏冲击》，可以在较低的图形设置下运行，但会出现明显的帧率下降，影响整体流畅度。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø49.9 (25-62)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø39.8 (18-53)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.7 (52-62)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø39.7 (33-41)

排放 -Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 几乎不节流

温度

在小米手机的 3DMark 压力测试中，我们没有观察到任何节流现象，而且在我们使用 Burnout 基准的负载情况下，表面温度保持在相对较低的水平。不过，在这一价格范围内，持续负载下的性能下降并不常见。对比设备也保持了一致的性能水平。

Max. Load

Idle


41.3 °C	40.9 °C	37.6 °C
39.4 °C	41 °C	36.6 °C
39.3 °C	38.7 °C	35.1 °C

Maximum: 41.3 °C
Average: 38.9 °C


34.8 °C	37.7 °C	37.3 °C
34.6 °C	36.7 °C	37.4 °C
32.1 °C	36.4 °C	37.2 °C

Maximum: 37.7 °C
Average: 36 °C

Power Supply (max.) 29 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.4 % +1%
Motorola Moto G85 Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.4 % +1%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.4 % +1%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98.8 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.6 %
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	97.8 % -1%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.7 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.6 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.6 % 0%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.4 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.4 %
Motorola Moto G85 Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.1 % 0%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98.9 % +1%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.6 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.4 %

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.03 (5.01-5.04)

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.83 (4.82-4.84)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.5 (18.3-18.6)

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø16.7 (16.6-17)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.53 (2.5-2.54)

发言人

Note 14 Pro 5G 配备了杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos）双扬声器系统，对于一款中端设备来说，音质还算不错。我们的粉红噪声测量结果显示，高音的频率响应线性，但中音可以更加平衡。扬声器还提供了一定的深度，但低音存在感极低。

在外部音频播放方面，用户可以通过有线 USB 端口或支持多种编解码器的蓝牙 5.4 无线连接设备。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 小米智能手机充电速度不快不慢

耗电量

Note 14 Pro 5G 配备了一块容量为 5,120mAh 的电池，可通过 USB-C 接口以高达 45 瓦的功率充电。不过，由于容量较大，充满一次电仍需 70 分钟左右。与 Note 13 Pro 相比，小米选择了较慢的充电速度，这有点令人费解。 Note 13 Pro相比，小米选择了较慢的充电速度，这有点令人费解。无线充电仍然不可用。

联发科 Dimensity 7300在空闲和负载条件下的功耗都不突出。不过，空闲模式下的功耗超过 1 瓦，仍有一定的优化空间。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.07 / 0.19 Watt
Idle	1.17 / 1.38 / 1.41 Watt
Load	3.58 / 8.44 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 5110 mAh	Xiaomi Poco X7 5110 mAh	Motorola Moto G85 5000 mAh	Nothing Phone (2a) Plus 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 5100 mAh	Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		6%	11%	-8%	-29%	-1%	7%	-21%
Idle Minimum *	1.17	1.09 7%	1 15%	0.86 26%	0.89 24%	1.3 -11%	0.926 ?(0.6 - 1.17, n=5) 21%	0.877 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=155, last 2 years) 25%
Idle Average *	1.38	1.28 7%	1.2 13%	1.56 -13%	1.99 -44%	1.4 -1%	1.382 ?(0.8 - 2.03, n=5) -0%	1.455 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=155, last 2 years) -5%
Idle Maximum *	1.41	1.31 7%	1.4 1%	1.59 -13%	2.14 -52%	1.6 -13%	1.476 ?(1.1 - 2.09, n=5) -5%	1.604 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=155, last 2 years) -14%
Load Average *	3.58	3.25 9%	3.4 5%	4.52 -26%	4.57 -28%	2.5 30%	3.25 ?(3.05 - 3.58, n=4) 9%	6.79 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -90%
Load Maximum *	8.44	8.62 -2%	6.8 19%	9.58 -14%	12.31 -46%	9.1 -8%	7.68 ?(5.4 - 8.62, n=4) 9%	10.2 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -21%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.51 (1.223-7.48)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.95 (1.383-9.14)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.076 (0.958-2.99)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.607 (1.531-2.56)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.43 (3.19-3.82)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.076 (0.958-2.99)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.607 (1.531-2.56)

电池寿命

Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 在日常使用中电池续航能力出色。在将显示屏亮度设置为 150 cd/m² 的标准测试中，该手机在使用 Wi-Fi 浏览时的续航时间超过 20 小时。在离线状态下连续播放视频，续航时间甚至可以达到近 24 小时，在电池效率方面表现出色。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		29h 14min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 133)		20h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		23h 43min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 56min

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 5110 mAh	Motorola Moto G85 5000 mAh	Nothing Phone (2a) Plus 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 5100 mAh
Battery Runtime		-4%	15%	8%	-1%
Reader / Idle	1754	1974 13%	2190 25%	2600 48%	1786 2%
H.264	1423	1114 -22%	1685 18%	1401 -2%	1142 -20%
WiFi v1.3	1206	894 -26%	1104 -8%	902 -25%	1002 -17%
Load	236	286 21%	298 26%	262 11%	307 30%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 的优势不在于性能或相机质量，但其整体用户体验令人印象深刻。该设备以其坚固的设计脱颖而出，增强了日常使用的耐用性和可用性。

Back to the verdict

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G - 02/14/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

87%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

91%

Connectivity

42 / 69 → 61%

Weight

89%

Battery

92%

Display

92%

Games Performance

15 / 55 → 26%

Application Performance

59 / 85 → 70%

AI Performance

10%

Temperature

91%

Noise

100%

Audio

79 / 90 → 88%

Camera

71%

Average

62%

78%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
25%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
96.6%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
61.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 45.5%

Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 评测--面向低价购物者的功能型智能手机

双胞胎成了问题。

判决

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

可能的替代品比较

Table of Contents

Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 的规格

手机壳 - IP 等级的小米智能手机

尺寸比较

功能 -Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G，带 USB 2.0

软件 - 小米手机仍运行Android 14

可持续性

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 仅配备 WiFi 6

手机功能和语音质量 -Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G，带 eSIM 卡

摄像头 - 配备 2 亿像素的小米手机

配件和保修 - 不含电源适配器的小米智能手机

输入设备和操作 -Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G，带面部解锁功能

显示屏 -Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 配备 OLED 显示屏

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 小米手机采用联发科技术

游戏 - 小米智能手机只能达到 60 帧/秒

排放 -Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 几乎不节流

温度

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

发言人

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G audio analysis

电池续航时间 - 小米智能手机充电速度不快不慢

耗电量

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 总体评分

More articles related to this device

Transparency