惠普 Elite x2 1012 G1 变形本简短评测
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 (Elite x2 Series)
Processor
Intel Core m5-6Y54 2 x 1.1 - 2.7 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 515, Core: 900 MHz, 双通道, 20.19.15.4331
Memory
8 GB
, LPDDR3-1866, 双通道, 板载
Display
12.10 inch 3:2, 1920 x 1280 pixel 191 PPI, 电容式, native pen support, LG Philips, IPS, Gorilla Glass 4, glossy: yes, detachable screen
Mainboard
Intel Skylake-Y Premium PCH
Storage
Liteon L8H-256V2G, 256 GB
, 200 GB free
Weight
1.205 kg
Price
1500 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LG Philips tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 323 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 318.8 cd/m² Minimum: 8 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 322 cd/m²
Contrast: 767:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.02 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.29 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
73.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
47.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
53.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
73.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
53.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.4
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 33.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| HP Elite x2 1012 G1 IPS, 1920x1280 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 IPS, 2736x1824 | Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 IPS, 2160x1440 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB IPS, 2736x1824 | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 IPS, 2732x2048 | Dell XPS 12 9250 4K IPS, 3840x2160 | HP Elite x2 1011 G1 IPS-Panel, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 28% | 30% | 26% | 50% | 58% | -14% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 53.8 | 67.5 25% | 68.1 27% | 65 21% | 91.2 70% | 83.9 56% | 44.4 -17% |
| sRGB Coverage | 73.7 | 96.6 31% | 97.4 32% | 96.5 31% | 98.1 33% | 99.8 35% | 66.4 -10% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 53.8 | 69 28% | 70.2 30% | 67 25% | 79.3 47% | 98.1 82% | 45.91 -15% |
| Response Times | -38% | 20% | -38% | -31% | |||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 33.2 ? | 46 ? -39% | 30 ? 10% | 46 ? -39% | 36 ? -8% | ||
| Response Time Black / White * | 22.8 ? | 31 ? -36% | 16 ? 30% | 31.2 ? -37% | 35 ? -54% | ||
| PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 200 ? | 50 ? | 1000 ? | |||
| Screen | 34% | 8% | 28% | 46% | 35% | -6% | |
| Brightness middle | 322 | 389.2 21% | 341 6% | 413 28% | 399 24% | 437 36% | 364 13% |
| Brightness | 319 | 392 23% | 318 0% | 396 24% | 393 23% | 399 25% | 331 4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 97 | 92 -5% | 87 -10% | 87 -10% | 92 -5% | 81 -16% | 84 -13% |
| Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.27 36% | 0.36 14% | 0.36 14% | 0.22 48% | 0.35 17% | 0.44 -5% |
| Contrast | 767 | 1441 88% | 947 23% | 1147 50% | 1814 137% | 1249 63% | 827 8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.02 | 3.61 40% | 6 -0% | 3.09 49% | 2.96 51% | 3.56 41% | 7.32 -22% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.06 | 9.3 8% | |||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.29 | 3.8 40% | 8.12 -29% | 3.92 38% | 3 52% | 2.67 58% | 7.37 -17% |
| Gamma | 2.4 92% | 2.16 102% | 2.23 99% | 2.3 96% | 2.21 100% | 2.17 101% | 2.03 108% |
| CCT | 7712 84% | 5969 109% | 7011 93% | 7333 89% | 7049 92% | 6681 97% | 6479 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 47.8 | 63 32% | 63.4 33% | 61 28% | 71.15 49% | 86 80% | 42.2 -12% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 73.2 | 97 33% | 97.4 33% | 97 33% | 97.87 34% | 100 37% | 66.1 -10% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 8% /
23% | 19% /
14% | 5% /
18% | 48% /
47% | 21% /
31% | -10% /
-8% |
* ... smaller is better
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | Geekbench 3 | Sunspider | JetStream 1.1 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | Peacekeeper
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
| Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
| Peacekeeper - --- (sort by value) | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 7 Score | 4808 points | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2983 points | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3423 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3932 points | |
Help | ||
| PCMark 7 - Score (sort by value) | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
Liteon L8H-256V2G
Sequential Read:
501 MB/s
Sequential Write:
297.2 MB/s
512K Read:
351.7 MB/s
512K Write:
295.7 MB/s
4K Read:
28.31 MB/s
4K Write:
90.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
285 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
268.4 MB/s
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 7912 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1334 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 47242 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4943 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 739 points | |
Help | ||
| 3DMark 06 - 1280x1024 Standard Score AA:0x AF:0x (sort by value) | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 59.9 | 31.2 | 21.6 | 9.5 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 44.1 | 24.6 | 20.7 | 5.9 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 35.5 | 23.5 | 15 | 4.3 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 11.2 | 7.1 | ||
| The Division (2016) | 12 | 8.4 | ||
| Hitman 2016 (2016) | 10.1 | 9.2 |
| BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset (sort by value) | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.9 °C / 94.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-6.8 °C / -12.2 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.9 °C / 94.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-6.8 °C / -12.2 F).
| HP Elite x2 1012 G1 6Y54, HD Graphics 515 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 6Y30, HD Graphics 515 | Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 6Y54, HD Graphics 515 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 6300U, HD Graphics 520 | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 A9X, A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx | Dell XPS 12 9250 4K 6Y75, HD Graphics 515 | HP Elite x2 1011 G1 5Y51, HD Graphics 5300 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -8% | 1% | -32% | -6% | -8% | 3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 39 | 43.6 -12% | 38.6 1% | 52.3 -34% | 40.1 -3% | 41.4 -6% | 36.6 6% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 41.2 | 45.2 -10% | 40.8 1% | 51.4 -25% | 39.3 5% | 43.9 -7% | 37.3 9% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 29.5 | 32.4 -10% | 30.4 -3% | 43.2 -46% | 33.8 -15% | 34.7 -18% | 30.5 -3% |
| Idle Bottom * | 29.8 | 29.6 1% | 28 6% | 36 -21% | 32.9 -10% | 29.4 1% | 29.9 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0.4 / 0.45 Watt |
| Idle |  3.7 / 6.8 / 7.6 Watt |
| Load |
22.5 / 34.5 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G1 6Y54, HD Graphics 515 | Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 6Y54, HD Graphics 515 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 6300U, HD Graphics 520 | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 A9X, A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx | Dell XPS 12 9250 4K 6Y75, HD Graphics 515 | HP Elite x2 1011 G1 5Y51, HD Graphics 5300 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -9% | -7% | 6% | -25% | 45% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.7 | 4 -8% | 4.4 -19% | 2.69 27% | 5.4 -46% | 1.5 59% |
| Idle Average * | 6.8 | 8.6 -26% | 9 -32% | 10.95 -61% | 10.2 -50% | 4 41% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.6 | 9.3 -22% | 10.7 -41% | 11.14 -47% | 12.5 -64% | 5 34% |
| Load Average * | 22.5 | 18.6 17% | 19.6 13% | 11.54 49% | 21.4 5% | 13.9 38% |
| Load Maximum * | 34.5 | 36.3 -5% | 19.9 42% | 12.8 63% | 24.4 29% | 16.9 51% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Elite x2 1012 G1 37 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 38 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 41 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 38 Wh | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 39 Wh | Dell XPS 12 9250 4K 28 Wh | HP Elite x2 1011 G1 54 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 8% | 11% | 1% | 79% | -41% | 68% | |
| Reader / Idle | 732 | 791 8% | 861 18% | 899 23% | 1933 164% | 370 -49% | 1063 45% |
| H.264 | 432 | 450 4% | 630 46% | 658 52% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 443 | 488 10% | 440 -1% | 427 -4% | 695 57% | 243 -45% | 675 52% |
| Load | 130 | 138 6% | 157 21% | 111 -15% | 195 50% | 93 -28% | 288 122% |
Pros
+ IPS屏幕
+ 安静
+ M.2固态硬盘
+ 键盘底座
+ 主动式手写笔
+ 非常优秀的电池续航
+ LTE模组
+ 3年质保
Cons
- 昂贵
- 机身不够坚固
和竞争生产商一样，惠普为Elite x2搭配了英特尔最新Skylake架构的酷睿m处理器。它的性能可以适应大部分用途。长时间负载也不会降低性能。不过，它的显卡会损失一些性能，在一小段时间的降温之后，它就可以回到正常的性能水平。我们认为，惠普在芯片散热设计上相比如联想IdeaPad Miix 700等设备明显更胜一筹。
固态硬盘为它带来了非常迅速的系统响应。如果需要的话，用户可以更换升级这块固态硬盘——不过我们建议寻求专业人士的帮助。我们很喜欢它的键盘底座，它与竞争对手都不相上下。这块键盘的一个优势是支持背光，IdeaPad Miix 700则缺少这一功能。它的电池续航也十分不错。不过它的屏幕还有待改进。并不是这块屏幕面板很差，但是在这个价位上，我们期待能够有更好的亮度和对比度。
Elite x2 1012 G1的明明意味着这台可分离式设备面对的是商务用户。对家庭用户来说当然它也有不小的吸引力。
那么哪款二合一产品更好呢——微软Surface 4 Pro，联想IdeaPad Miix 700，惠普Elite x2 1012 G1还是戴尔XPS 12 9250？戴尔的设备由于续航时间一般应该会是第一位出局者。在剩下的三台设备之间，决定因素则是用户的个人喜好，需求和预算了。它们在测试中表现都可圈可点，我们认为它们都值得推荐。售价最实惠的选择是更亲近家庭用户的IdeaPad Miix 700。搭配键盘和手写笔的Miix 700起售价约950欧元（约7040人民币）。Surface Pro 4有最明亮的屏幕，超高对比度和分辨率。惠普Elite x2 1012 G1则在处理器性能上更胜一筹。需要内置LTE模组的用户需要在联想或者惠普的产品间做出选择。另外一台值得参考的设备是三星Galaxy Tab PRO S。它正在测试中，我们将在近日发布它的评测。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
- 04/19/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Convertible - Weighted Average
Price comparison
