惠普EliteBook 830 G8商务笔记本回顾。1,000尼特SureView面板仍有问题
继去年
，HP EliteBook 830的全面更新后，第八代的变化仅限于新的处理器和一些连接功能。这款紧凑的商务副本可使用英特尔最新的Tiger Lake 处理器，也可在835 G8型号中使用AMD的Ryzen 5000芯片。</p> <p style>我们的测试设备的型号为3C7Y8EA，配置非常全面。花费大约2900欧元（约合人民币3410元），客户可以得到酷睿i7-1165G7处理器、32GB内存、1TB PCIe固态硬盘和一个集成的5G调制解调器。此外，还内置了特别明亮的1000尼特显示器，并提供一个集成的隐私过滤器（SureView）。在最低配置的变体中（酷睿i5，8GB内存，256GB固态硬盘），EliteBook 830 G8的起价大约为1300欧元（约1528美元）。<br />
Possible contenders in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 18 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 89.3 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 18.2 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1200 | |
| 84.7 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2021 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 14.5 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
| 87.8 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2021 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 14.6 mm | 13.90" | 3000x2000 | |
| 87.4 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2021 | Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 14.8 mm | 13.40" | 3840x2400 |
外壳--EliteBook采用优质铝制外壳
在EliteBook 830去年才在其第七代 ，得到一个全新的外壳后，今年没有任何变化。铝制外壳看起来仍然非常高端，而且制造得非常完美。稳定性非常高，无论是基本单元还是显示屏盖子都是如此。我们特别喜欢中央铰链，因为盖子可以用一只手轻松打开，但同时，它足够坚固，可以有效防止盖子晃动。最大开孔角度约为160度。
EliteBook的设计看起来非常清醒，银色外壳和黑色对比元素（键盘、显示屏边框）的组合对消费者和商业用户来说都很合适。显示屏边框在上次的外壳更新后变得更窄，但特别是在面板的顶部和底部仍然相当宽。这表明惠普仍在使用16:9的面板，而许多竞争对手已经转回16:10的格式。尽管如此，EliteBook 830 G8整体看起来非常现代。
EliteBook 830 G8是我们对比组中最紧凑的机型之一；只有XPS 13，占地面积略小。另一方面，我们的竞争对手在重量上没有什么不同（都是~1.3公斤）。
连接性 - 惠普提供了一个可选的5G调制解调器
端口布局保持不变，但对Tiger Lake 处理器的更新也增加了新的Thunderbolt 4端口（USB 4，40 Gb/s）。惠普继续包括熟悉的旧电源适配器的电源端口，但附带的电源适配器使用USB-C。
沟通
就像的前身 ，这里也使用了英特尔的无线AX201 WLAN模块。在我们与Netgear Nighthawk RAX120参考路由器的测试中，传输速率非常好，而且支持包括蓝牙5.2在内的所有重要标准。然而，一些竞争对手已经提供了更快的Wi-Fi 6E模块。
可选的是，惠普还提供LTE或5G调制解调器。我们的测试设备支持5G（Snapdragon X55），可以使用eSIM卡，也可以使用nano SIM卡。我们测试了一张来自Telekom的nano SIM卡，它被立即检测到并正常工作。接收情况比智能手机好，即使在城市的室内，我们也能达到80-90 Mb/s的速度。
网络摄像头
网络摄像头没有变化。仍然使用带有机械快门的720p模块，即使在良好的照明条件下，它也不能提供特别好的图像质量。也有一个用于Windows Hello的红外摄像头。
安全问题
安全问题在EliteBook笔记本电脑系列中非常重要。开箱后，已经有几个全面的软件解决方案，当然还有TPM 2.0芯片以及指纹扫描仪和可选的智能卡阅读器等功能。此外，EliteBook 830 G8和835 G8都被惠普配备了提供高级安全和管理功能的处理器（分别为英特尔vPro和AMD Ryzen Pro）。
维护
底部的盖子只用几颗十字头螺钉固定，可以非常容易地取下。内存和M.2-2280固态硬盘都在额外的盖子下，但这些都可以很容易地拆掉。一款紧凑的微型笔记本仍然提供两个SODIMM插槽，而不是焊接的RAM，这已经成为一个罕见的事实。两个通信模块（WLAN和WWAN）也可以被替换。
输入设备 - 830 G8带有可靠的键盘
黑色chiclet键盘基本上没有变化，仍然是移动领域中最好的输入设备之一。由于联想在ThinkPad X13
，例如采用了一个行程较小的较差的键盘，现在这两个竞争对手在这方面至少是持平的；主观上，我们实际上更喜欢EliteBook的键盘一些。由于采用了两段式白色背光，在较暗的环境中工作也没有任何问题。在EliteBook 830 G7 ，PointStick及其专用鼠标按钮被取消。点击板的使用没有问题，但按照现代标准，它不是特别大，只有11 x 6.3厘米。你可以点击它的下部区域，ClickPad会以一种低沉而复杂的噪音作出反应。
显示屏 - 1,000尼特的SureView屏幕
如前所述，惠普仍在使用熟悉的16:9格式的13.3英寸显示屏。我们的测试设备配备了可选的SureView面板，该面板带有一个集成的隐私过滤器；它应该可以达到1000cd/m²的亮度。根据我们的测量，我们可以确认这一点，但与早期的SureView面板一样，有一些问题。SureView只在较低的亮度范围内工作，因此在明亮的环境中很难使用。此外，当你按下相应的键启用SureView时，亮度调节会变得很混乱。我们在下表中收集了测量的亮度水平。
| Brightness | 100% | 90% | 80% | 70% | 60% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 0% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 1,007 | 773 | 607 | 489 | 405 | 345 | 285 | 235 | 188 | 145 | 108 |
| SureView | 110 | 102 | 94 | 85 | 76 | 69 | 60 | 52 | 26 | 16 | 3.5 |
在我们的测量中，亮度传感器和英特尔GPU驱动程序的省电选项被停用，但当SureView被启用时，我们仍然能够记录不同的数值（最大约为250cd/m²）；然而，这些数值并不总是可重复的。一般来说，这种配置（SureView只在最低亮度光谱下工作）是有问题的，因为你实际上是被迫在较暗的环境中使用SureView，因为超过100cd/m²的最低亮度太高了。
该面板的主观图像印象并不好，因为即使关闭了SureView功能，可视角度也是有限的，即使是对中央甜蜜点的微小偏离（包括垂直和水平方向）也会分别导致亮度和对比度的明显损失。此外，明亮的区域看起来有点颗粒感。我们没能检测到PWM，尽管亮度很高，但屏幕出血并不是一个大问题。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 1004 cd/m²
Contrast: 2962:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.4
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
71.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
| HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 X133NVFF R0, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE NV133WUM-N61, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 LQ135P1JX51, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 TIANMA XM, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K Sharp LQ134R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.4" | HP EliteBook 830 G7 Chi Mei CMN13A9, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 3% | -3% | -4% | 11% | -2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 69.2 | 71.1 3% | 64.7 -7% | 64.9 -6% | 80.2 16% | 65.7 -5% |
| sRGB Coverage | 94.5 | 99.7 6% | 97.2 3% | 94.4 0% | 100 6% | 97.4 3% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.1 | 71.1 0% | 66.9 -6% | 66.3 -7% | 78.9 11% | 67.4 -5% |
| Response Times | 38% | -37% | 14% | -34% | -6% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45 ? | 30.8 ? 32% | 62.8 ? -40% | 37.6 ? 16% | 59.2 ? -32% | 46.8 ? -4% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 17.2 ? 43% | 39.8 ? -33% | 26.4 ? 12% | 40.4 ? -35% | 32 ? -7% |
| PWM Frequency | 21930 ? | 2137 ? | 26600 ? | |||
| Screen | -5% | 3% | 10% | -2% | -2% | |
| Brightness middle | 1007 | 320 -68% | 413 -59% | 502 -50% | 508.7 -49% | 454.5 -55% |
| Brightness | 985 | 310 -69% | 400 -59% | 474 -52% | 479 -51% | 435 -56% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 89 2% | 94 8% | 89 2% | 84 -3% | 91 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.24 29% | 0.29 15% | 0.33 3% | 0.3 12% | 0.27 21% |
| Contrast | 2962 | 1333 -55% | 1424 -52% | 1521 -49% | 1696 -43% | 1683 -43% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4 | 2.7 32% | 2.8 30% | 1.35 66% | 2.72 32% | 3.12 22% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.9 | 7.6 15% | 7.2 19% | 3.67 59% | 4.7 47% | 4.85 46% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.4 | 0.9 62% | 0.8 67% | 1.2 50% | 1.92 20% | 1.97 18% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 4.1 5% | 1.9 56% | 1.7 60% | 3.4 21% | 3.1 28% |
| Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.24 98% | 2.12 104% | 2.24 98% | 2.11 104% | 2.01 109% |
| CCT | 6462 101% | 6429 101% | 6510 100% | 6440 101% | 6245 104% | 6902 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61.6 | 61.1 | 70.7 | 61.5 | ||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97.2 | 94.3 | 100 | 97 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 12% /
3% | -12% /
-4% | 7% /
7% | -8% /
-3% | -3% /
-2% |
* ... smaller is better
工厂校准并不坏，虽然只有轻微的色差，但肉眼几乎看不到。然而，启用SureView后，图像质量明显恶化。颜色偏差更大，灰度现在也显示出更暖的色温，并结合明显的红色色调。
我们可以通过校准（CalMAN和X-Rite i1 Pro 2）改善一下色彩再现，但对于商业环境来说，这并不是真正必要的。此外，蓝色的高色彩偏差仍然存在，这意味着该面板不是编辑图像的理想选择。至少较小的sRGB色彩空间几乎被完全映射。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 25 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
由于亮度高，即使在非常明亮的环境中，哑光显示屏仍然可以很好地使用，只要你将屏幕远离阳光。然而，这只适用于禁用SureView时。
总的来说，即使没有启用SureView技术，可视角度的稳定性也明显不如其他IPS显示屏。激活它甚至进一步限制了视角，例如，坐在你旁边的人几乎无法看清屏幕上的内容。因此，从原则上讲，它可以按预期工作，但由于有很强的局限性，我们建议使用400cd/m²的普通全高清面板，因为在这种情况下你仍然可以使用外部隐私过滤器（箔）。
性能 - 英特尔Tiger Lake U
处理器 - 酷睿i7-1165G7
著名的Core i7-1165G7在我们的测试设备中以四个核心和高达4.7 GHz的最大涡轮增压时钟速度运行。开始时，处理器被允许短暂地消耗高达46瓦的功率，但几秒钟后，消耗量稳定在20瓦，相当于4倍~3.0GHz。这种设计相当保守，使得性能不是特别高，也不一定比前代产品EliteBook 830 G7
。CPU的性能对许多任务来说是足够的，特别是在商业环境中，但恰恰是目前的AMD Ryzen CPU在多核应用中提供了明显的性能，特别是。如果你可以不用Thunderbolt/USB 4，EliteBook 835 G8将是一个不错的选择。
在电池供电的情况下，几秒钟后能源消耗被限制在15瓦，这也解释了为什么性能也略差（-10%至-15%）。进一步的CPU基准测试可以在这里找到Mobile Processors - Benchmark List 。
Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1110 - 1539, n=59) | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (2525 - 6862, n=64) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (442 - 589, n=81) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 | |
| HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1060 - 2657, n=81) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (115 - 230, n=78) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 | |
| HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (553 - 1027, n=86) | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (468 - 1138, n=80) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
| HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (4478 - 5507, n=80) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 | |
| HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (15347 - 27405, n=80) | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1302 - 1595, n=77) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 | |
| HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (3078 - 5926, n=77) | |
| HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1.39 - 8.47, n=80) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (21.5 - 88.1, n=78) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (0.552 - 1.002, n=80) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=59, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
系统性能
尽管CPU的性能有些一般，但对系统性能的主观印象却很好。首先，这仍然是一个强大的移动处理器，而且正如预期的那样，EliteBook还配备了一个快速的PCIe固态硬盘，导致设备对输入作出反应时没有明显的延迟。合成PCMark 10基准测试也产生了非常好的结果。
与其他一些较新的惠普笔记本电脑一样，系统并不总是顺利地进入待机模式。有时，你会注意到风扇仍在运转，在最坏的情况下，电池就会被不必要地耗尽。
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4531 - 5454, n=50) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (9363 - 11331, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (8997 - 11505, n=50) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5570 - 7136, n=50) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4083 - 5550, n=50) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5034 points | |
Help | ||
DPC延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试中（网页浏览、YouTube 4K播放、CPU负载），测试设备显示出高延迟问题。因此，在目前的BIOS版本下，它不适合实时音频应用，但这仍可能随着未来的更新而改变。不过，播放视频时至少没有掉帧。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
* ... smaller is better
储存
虽然EliteBook 830 G8仍然不支持新的PCIe 4.0接口，但内置的三星PM981a以非常高的传输速率令人信服。1TB的存储容量（设置后约900GB可用）也应该完全满足大多数用户的需求。进一步的固态硬盘基准测试可在这里Laptop SSD & HDD Benchmarks 。
| HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV | HP EliteBook 830 G7 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Average Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 3% | -38% | 16% | -19% | -8% | -3% | |
| Write 4K | 133.1 | 171.4 29% | 118.2 -11% | 197.5 48% | 86 -35% | 118.3 -11% | 139.7 ? 5% |
| Read 4K | 58 | 70.8 22% | 37.54 -35% | 52.9 -9% | 40.11 -31% | 60.4 4% | 49.9 ? -14% |
| Write Seq | 2032 | 1771 -13% | 1017 -50% | 2174 7% | 1738 -14% | 2067 2% | 2036 ? 0% |
| Read Seq | 2456 | 1755 -29% | 926 -62% | 2156 -12% | 1553 -37% | 2394 -3% | 2014 ? -18% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 461.9 | 525 14% | 354.2 -23% | 632 37% | 454.9 -2% | 325.5 -30% | 461 ? 0% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 454.2 | 479.5 6% | 352.6 -22% | 694 53% | 385.4 -15% | 332.2 -27% | 499 ? 10% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 3021 | 2818 -7% | 1174 -61% | 3017 0% | 2784 -8% | 2978 -1% | 2903 ? -4% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3534 | 3548 0% | 2261 -36% | 3561 1% | 3217 -9% | 3552 1% | 3479 ? -2% |
| AS SSD | 74% | -14% | 60% | -2% | -33% | 34% | |
| Seq Read | 2797 | 2776 -1% | 1821 -35% | 2794 0% | 2144 -23% | 2081 -26% | 2553 ? -9% |
| Seq Write | 1528 | 1461 -4% | 794 -48% | 2385 56% | 1389 -9% | 1433 -6% | 2084 ? 36% |
| 4K Read | 54.3 | 63.8 17% | 47.54 -12% | 60.7 12% | 49.77 -8% | 49.92 -8% | 53.1 ? -2% |
| 4K Write | 128.4 | 209.4 63% | 141.6 10% | 180.8 41% | 105 -18% | 119.1 -7% | 131.2 ? 2% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1095 | 1148 5% | 782 -29% | 1768 61% | 855 -22% | 585 -47% | 1477 ? 35% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1640 | 1623 -1% | 766 -53% | 1800 10% | 1660 1% | 1630 -1% | 1805 ? 10% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.041 | 0.032 22% | 0.191 -366% | 0.037 10% | 0.058 -41% | 0.043 -5% | 0.04983 ? -22% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.03 | 0.019 37% | 0.027 10% | 0.073 -143% | 0.272 -807% | 0.097 -223% | 0.04222 ? -41% |
| Score Read | 1429 | 1489 4% | 1012 -29% | 2108 48% | 1119 -22% | 843 -41% | 1786 ? 25% |
| Score Write | 1922 | 1978 3% | 987 -49% | 2219 15% | 1904 -1% | 1892 -2% | 2144 ? 12% |
| Score Total | 4029 | 4178 4% | 2477 -39% | 5392 34% | 3570 -11% | 3149 -22% | 4826 ? 20% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 2715 | 1833 -32% | 1243 -54% | 2065 -24% | 1929 -29% | 2452 -10% | 2098 ? -23% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 130.1 | 993 663% | 628 383% | 734 464% | 1012 678% | 72.2 -45% | 500 ? 284% |
| Copy Game MB/s | 459.3 | 1607 250% | 976 112% | 1629 255% | 1737 278% | 404 -12% | 1132 ? 146% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 39% /
48% | -26% /
-23% | 38% /
44% | -11% /
-8% | -21% /
-24% | 16% /
20% |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
显卡 - 英特尔Xe Graphics G7 96 EUs
该处理器集成的Xe Graphics G7，负责图形处理。这是速度更快的版本，有96个处理单元，这也得益于RAM的双通道配置。然而，iGPU与LPDDR4X内存结合使用时，其速度仍然要快几个百分点。尽管如此，前辈 的 旧版UHD Graphics 的 性能明显超过了它，新的iGPU在合成测试中的速度是2-3倍。此外，性能也保持稳定，因为苛刻的3DMarkTime Spy 压力测试以98%完成。
有了更强大的iGPU，旧的或要求不高的游戏往往可以顺利播放，至少在低细节方面。但无论如何，这在一台商务笔记本电脑中起着次要作用。
与处理器一样，图形性能在电池电量上大约降低10-15%。额外的GPU基准测试可在我们专门的基准测试部分 。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 6302 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 80566 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 16722 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4168 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1617 points | |
Help | ||
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 77.5 | 65.6 | 22 | 8.79 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 72 | 49 | 25.9 | 13 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 116 | 71.6 | 49.4 | 46.8 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 37.8 | 20.1 | 14.9 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 19.2 | 18.6 | 17.7 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 43 | 23 | 21 | 20 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 83.3 | 34.3 | 27.9 | 22.5 |
| F1 2020 (2020) | 87 | 41 | 33 | 21 |
排放--EliteBook保持安静
噪声排放
单个风扇总体上非常安静，即使在负载下，也只能听到安静的嘶嘶声。在低负荷和闲置状态下，风扇通常是完全关闭的，但每当这时，它就会无缘无故地启动。我们已经在过去几个月的其他惠普笔记本电脑中看到了这种行为。除此以外，我们无法检测到任何电子噪音或线圈啸叫。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 26 / 26 / 27.5 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 35.4 / 35.3 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 26 dB(A) | ||
| HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV | HP EliteBook 830 G7 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | 2% | 4% | -1% | -2% | |
| off / environment * | 26 | 25.5 2% | 24.2 7% | 25.4 2% | 27.7 -7% | 26.8 -3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 26 | 25.5 2% | 24.2 7% | 25.6 2% | 27.8 -7% | 27.1 -4% |
| Idle Average * | 26 | 25.5 2% | 24.2 7% | 25.6 2% | 27.8 -7% | 27.1 -4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 27.5 | 29 -5% | 24.2 12% | 25.6 7% | 27.8 -1% | 27.1 1% |
| Load Average * | 35.4 | 37.4 -6% | 39.5 -12% | 28.7 19% | 27.9 21% | 31.4 11% |
| Load Maximum * | 35.3 | 37.4 -6% | 39.5 -12% | 38.2 -8% | 37 -5% | 39 -10% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.4 | 32 | 32.8 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
当涉及到表面温度时，保守的处理器配置具有积极的作用，因为即使在满负荷的情况下，也只有少数地方达到40℃（约104°F）以上。在日常使用中，机箱几乎没有升温。
在压力测试中，功耗定格在19瓦左右，处理器和显卡都需要分担这个功率（CPU：4倍~1.5-1.6GHz；iGPU：~680MHz）。压力测试后没有直接的性能损失。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.7 °C / 87.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.4 °C / -4.4 F).
发言人
虽然键盘旁边的两个立体声扬声器不会变得非常响亮，但它们以对中音和高音的干净再现而令人信服，这在再现声音时尤其积极。使用这些模块，即使是播放视频和听一些音乐也没有问题，而且耳机或外部扬声器也不是绝对必要的。
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--具有良好续航能力的惠普次笔记本
能源消耗
当涉及到功耗时，明亮的面板需要付出代价，因为在全亮度的情况下，空闲功耗是旧的EliteBook 830 G7，低功率1080p显示屏（400 cd/m²）的两倍。在满负荷状态下，消耗量很快就稳定在30瓦以上，这意味着附带的65瓦电源适配器完全足够了。
| Off / Standby | 0.5 / 2.9 Watt |
| Idle | 6.5 / 8.4 / 10.3 Watt |
| Load |
34.6 / 33 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.4" | HP EliteBook 830 G7 i7-10810U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -1% | -1% | -21% | -8% | 6% | -25% | -18% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 6.5 | 2.8 57% | 2.6 60% | 6.7 -3% | 4.3 34% | 3.6 45% | 5.34 ? 18% | 4.4 ? 32% |
| Idle Average * | 8.4 | 5.9 30% | 6 29% | 10 -19% | 8.3 1% | 4.7 44% | 8.55 ? -2% | 7.57 ? 10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.3 | 6.8 34% | 8.2 20% | 10.3 -0% | 8.8 15% | 5.1 50% | 10.8 ? -5% | 9.39 ? 9% |
| Load Average * | 34.6 | 41.5 -20% | 41.4 -20% | 35.7 -3% | 46.2 -34% | 33.3 4% | 45.3 ? -31% | 45.7 ? -32% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 34.4 | 34.2 1% | 32.7 5% | 42.2 -23% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 33 | 68.2 -107% | 64.1 -94% | 67.6 -105% | 47.3 -43% | 70 -112% | 67.5 ? -105% | 68.6 ? -108% |
* ... smaller is better
Energy consumption during The Witcher 3 / Stress test
电池寿命
由于53Wh的电池容量保持不变，现实世界的电池寿命由于明亮的显示屏而变差。即使调整后的亮度为150cd/m²，功耗也更高，我们的WLAN测试只运行了8小时，而前代产品仍为11.5小时左右。在全亮度下，该设备甚至不能达到5小时。需要更长电池运行时间的用户肯定应该选择低功耗的1080p显示屏，EliteBook 830 G8也有这个功能。
| HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 53 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 54.7 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 47.4 Wh | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 52 Wh | HP EliteBook 830 G7 i7-10810U, UHD Graphics 620, 53 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 11% | -11% | 51% | -10% | 76% | 32% | |
| H.264 | 696 | 902 30% | 667 -4% | 927 ? 33% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 480 | 597 24% | 454 -5% | 629 31% | 430 -10% | 692 44% | 734 ? 53% |
| Load | 107 | 83 -22% | 81 -24% | 182 70% | 221 107% | 117.7 ? 10% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1167 | 2078 | 1808 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 - EliteBook 830的保守更新
在去年的重大更新之后，惠普只对新的EliteBook 830 G8进行了仔细的更新。外壳一直保持不变，连同英特尔的新Tiger Lake 处理器，现在也有了Thunderbolt 4和USB 4。然而，新的处理器由于保守的配置而变得缓慢，它不能跟上AMD的最新处理器，特别是在多核应用中。
然而，主观的性能印象非常好，EliteBook在日常使用中以其安静和凉爽的操作说服了人们。同样，键盘也给人留下了非常好的印象，至少与新的ThinkPad X13第二代持平，后者现在得到了一个稍差的键盘。此外，830 G8是少数仍然易于维护的现代副笔记本之一，因为内存和通信模块，包括5G调制解调器，都不是焊接的。
与竞争对手不同，如ThinkPad X13第二代 ，XPS 13 9310 ，或 Surface Laptop 4 ，惠普在这一代仍然坚持使用熟悉的16：9显示屏。我们的测试模型的显示屏非常明亮，超过1000cd/m²，但集成的SureView隐私过滤器损害了图像质量。即使禁用该功能，也只有一个非常狭窄的甜蜜点；即使小的偏差也会导致明显的对比度损失。此外，SureView只在较低的亮度范围内工作，因此很难适用于明亮的环境。此外，还有高耗电量和由此产生的较低的电池寿命。总而言之，在我们看来，SureView技术的缺点太大。因此，我们推荐EliteBook 830 G8，配备众所周知的低功率1080p显示屏。如果你真的需要一个隐私过滤器，我们建议使用一个额外的保护罩。
新款EliteBook 830 G8仍然是一款非常好的商务次笔记本，它首先以其安全功能、良好的输入设备和可选的LTE/5G连接而令人信服。然而，1,000 cd/m²的SureView显示屏并不值得推荐，因为它严重影响了图像质量。
此外，惠普在下一次更新中还有一些追赶工作要做，因为竞争对手已经回到了16:10的面板，尽管价格很高，但我们仍然没有得到PCIe 4.0 SSD和更快的Wi-Fi 6E模块等技术。需要更多移动处理能力的用户也应该看看配备AMD最新Ryzen 5000处理器的相同结构的EliteBook 835 G8。
价格和可用性
我们确切的测试设备配置在写作时似乎还没有。目前你可以在亚马逊上找到一个x360版本（可转换）。它配备了酷睿i7-1165G7处理器，16GB内存，512GB固态硬盘存储，以及触摸屏全高清IPS显示屏，售价2399美元。
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
- 08/25/2021 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Price comparison
