Notebookcheck Logo

惠普EliteBook 845 G10评测：配备 AMD Zen4 的近乎完美的商务笔记本电脑

120 赫兹和 5G。

惠普推出了搭载 AMD 处理器的最佳商务笔记本--新款 EliteBook 845 G10。Ryzen 9 Pro 7940HS 性能强劲，EliteBook 在其他方面也没有任何弱点。只有内存配置不够理想。
AMD Business Laptop / Notebook Ultrabook Windows

EliteBook 840 系列是惠普的高品质 14 英寸商务笔记本电脑，直接与联想的ThinkPad T14s 系列直接竞争。与联想一样，惠普也提供配备英特尔处理器（EliteBook 840）和 AMD 处理器（EliteBook 845）的机型。EliteBook 840 的上面是 EliteBook 1040 旗舰版，它（与 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 一样）只配备英特尔处理器。

第 10 代产品进行了小幅更新，但基本外壳设计保持不变。我们的测试机是惠普 EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA，售价 2,249 欧元（学生价 1,835 欧元），配备了新的 Zen4 处理器AMD Ryzen 9 Pro 7940HS以及分辨率为 2,560 x 1,600 的全新 120 Hz 屏幕。其他配置包括 1 TB SSD、32 GB 内存和 5G 调制解调器。

HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA (EliteBook 845 G10 Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 8 x 4 - 5.2 GHz, 51 W PL2 / Short Burst, 41 W PL1 / Sustained, Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon 780M, Core: 2800 MHz, RAM: 2800 MHz, 23.7.2
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR5-5600, single channel, 2 slots, max. 64 GB
Display
14.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 216 PPI, AUO6DA8, IPS, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, 1024 GB 
, 895 GB free
Soundcard
AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Realtek 8852CE (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.0, LTE, 5G
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 17.9 x 323.6 x 214.7
Battery
51 Wh, 4249 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: 5 MP with IR
Primary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 65W PSU, 36 Months Warranty
Weight
1.466 kg, Power Supply: 314 g
Price
2249 Euro
Links
HP homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
90.1 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2023
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M		1.5 kg17.9 mm14.00"2560x1600
90.6 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2023
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M		1.3 kg16.9 mm14.00"1920x1200
90.3 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
Dell Latitude 7440
i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs		1.2 kg17.95 mm14.00"2560x1600
89.6 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		1.3 kg15.6 mm14.20"3120x2080
88.8 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2022
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU		1.3 kg16.6 mm14.00"2880x1800

外壳 - 铝质，维护方便

惠普 EliteBook 845 G10 的外壳主要采用铝制材料，其构造与去年的 G9 机型并无不同。 去年的 G9 机型.银色外壳整体非常内敛，除了盖子上的反光惠普徽标和黑色键盘外，没有任何色彩对比。机身表面整体非常耐脏。

底座的稳定性非常好，没有发出嘎吱嘎吱的声音。铰链调节良好，最大开启角度为 180 度。显示屏盖子本身的弹性稍差，但我们无法看到任何图像失真。两侧的屏幕边框非常窄，只有上下两侧稍厚，但没有摄像头驼峰。

EliteBook 845 G10 的重量为 1.466 千克，并不轻巧，在我们的对比组中也排在最后一位。它也比竞争对手的设备稍宽，但没有那么厚。非常紧凑的 65 瓦电源又增加了 300 克。

尺寸比较

❌
323.6 mm 214.7 mm 17.9 mm 1.5 kg317.5 mm 226.9 mm 16.9 mm 1.3 kg313 mm 220.2 mm 17.95 mm 1.2 kg310 mm 221 mm 15.6 mm 1.3 kg308.8 mm 215 mm 16.6 mm 1.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备 - 配备 USB 4 的 AMD EliteBook

端口选择非常合理。除了一个读卡器外，所有重要的端口，包括一个智能卡读卡器（例如用于公司 ID 卡）都一应俱全。两个 USB-C 端口支持 USB 4.0 标准，因此可以连接外置显卡。

左：HDMI 2.0、USB-A 3.2 Gen.1（5 GBit/s，供电）、2x USB-C 4.0（40 GBit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式 1.4、Power Delivery）、智能卡读卡器
左：HDMI 2.0、USB-A 3.2 Gen.1（5 GBit/s，供电）、2x USB-C 4.0（40 GBit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式 1.4、Power Delivery）、智能卡读卡器
右侧Nano SIM 卡插槽、安全锁插槽、USB-A 3.2 Gen.1 (5Gbps)、3.5 毫米音频接口
右侧Nano SIM 卡插槽、安全锁插槽、USB-A 3.2 Gen.1 (5Gbps)、3.5 毫米音频接口

交流

来自 Fibocom 的 5G 调制解调器
来自 Fibocom 的 5G 调制解调器

WLAN 模块来自 Realtek（8852CE），也支持当前的 Wi-Fi 6E 标准。在测试中，我们可以顺利连接到华硕参考路由器的相应 6 GHz 网络。传输速率和信号稳定性都非常出色，效果优于同类产品。华硕路由器没有网络端口，但可以通过选配的 USB 适配器添加。此外，我们的测试设备（FM350GL）安装了 Fibocom 的 5G 调制解调器，您可以使用 nano-SIM 卡或 eSIM 卡。

Networking
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
Realtek 8852CE
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1820 (min: 1772) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1749 (min: 1715) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
Qualcomm WCN685x
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1594 (min: 818) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1712 (min: 1683) MBit/s ∼100%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
767 (min: 626) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1239 (min: 1088) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1009 (min: 740) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1223 (min: 1075) MBit/s ∼70%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
591 (min: 549) MBit/s ∼37%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
938 (min: 925) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1353 (min: 1192) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1682 (min: 868) MBit/s ∼96%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1458 (min: 1294) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1570 (min: 1446) MBit/s ∼92%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
Qualcomm Fast Connect 6900 Wi-Fi 6E Dual Band Simultaneous
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1375 (min: 748) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1662 (min: 1357) MBit/s ∼95%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1820 (1772-1868)
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1748 (1715-1761)

网络摄像头

惠普安装了一个 500 万像素摄像头，图像质量明显优于一般的 1080p 机型，尤其是在图像清晰度方面。虽然色彩精确度并不理想，但没有外置摄像头也能轻松应对，尤其是在视频会议时。此外，还安装了一个红外摄像头，用于通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别。

ColorChecker
12.7 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
12 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
ColorChecker HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA: 13.53 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 22.15 ∆E

维护

底板用五颗普通的十字螺丝固定，很容易拆卸。由于固态硬盘旁边有两个内存插槽，因此维护选项总体上非常不错。这些插槽位于额外的盖板下，但只能夹住。WLAN 和 WWAN 模块也已插入。

内部结构
内部结构
内部结构（不含内存和固态硬盘盖板）
内部结构（不含内存和固态硬盘盖板）
内存、固态硬盘和无线局域网模块可互换
内存、固态硬盘和无线局域网模块可互换

输入设备 - 最佳笔记本键盘

EliteBook 845 G10 的键盘是市场上最好的笔记本键盘之一。键程约为 1.5 毫米，反馈非常精确。主观而言，与目前的 ThinkPad 机型相比，我们更喜欢这款键盘。唯一需要适应的是小方向键和电源键，后者集成在键盘右上方。指纹扫描仪位于键盘下方。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘背光
键盘背光

一段时间以来，惠普一直在摒弃键盘中间的指点杆和配套的专用鼠标按钮，转而使用普通的 ClickPad。不过，这并不一定是缺点，ClickPad 的使用效果非常好。光滑的表面提供了良好的滑动特性，可以毫无限制地实现所有输入（包括多点触摸手势）。

显示屏 - 120 赫兹，无 PWM

子像素网格
子像素网格
轻微光晕
轻微光晕

惠普为 EliteBook 845 G10 提供多种显示屏。我们不能推荐 250 尼特 IPS 显示屏（并非在所有地区都有供应）或 SureView 显示屏（高达 1,000 尼特，但主观图像质量较差）。另一方面，400 尼特 IPS 显示屏（全高清）是一款可靠的屏幕，由于功耗较低，运行时间最长。我们的测试设备安装了可选的 120 Hz IPS 显示屏，分辨率为 2560x1600，表面防眩光。屏幕并非完全哑光，但反光极少。

我们对画质的主观印象是整体非常好，因为色彩看起来很鲜艳，内容也非常清晰。在很短的距离内，明亮的区域会出现轻微的颗粒感，但在正常的坐姿距离内这不是问题。惠普规定的亮度为 500 cd/m²，而我们测试设备的平均亮度为 560 cd/m²，明显超过了这一标准。0.38 cd/m² 的黑色值在高亮度下略显不足，但整体对比度仍接近 1500:1。由于没有使用 PWM，IPS 面板的响应时间非常好，但有轻微的光晕，尤其是在上边缘。

542
cd/m²		525
cd/m²		591
cd/m²
567
cd/m²		546
cd/m²		608
cd/m²
560
cd/m²		536
cd/m²		599
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AUO6DA8 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 608 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 563.8 cd/m² Minimum: 26.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 549 cd/m²
Contrast: 1437:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AUO6DA8, IPS, 2560x1600, 14"		Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
MNE007JA1-1, LTPS IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14"		Dell Latitude 7440
AU Optronics B140QAX, IPS, 2560x1600, 14"		Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
TMX1422, IPS, 3120x2080, 14.2"		SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
MNE007ZA1-1, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"		HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
InfoVision X140NV4J, IPS, 1920x1200, 14"
Display
-15%
-12%
-4%
-13%
-17%
Display P3 Coverage
98.3
69.4
-29%
75.4
-23%
89.8
-9%
74.1
-25%
69
-30%
sRGB Coverage
99.8
99.8
0%
99.9
0%
99.4
0%
97.4
-2%
99
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
86.2
71.4
-17%
76.2
-12%
84.2
-2%
75.3
-13%
70
-19%
Response Times
-189%
-316%
-23%
-116%
-155%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
12.7 ?(5.8, 7)
36.3 ?(16.4, 19.8)
-186%
56 ?(26.1, 29.9)
-341%
20 ?(6, 14)
-57%
31.5 ?(14, 17.5)
-148%
31 ?(15, 16)
-144%
Response Time Black / White *
7.9 ?(4.1, 3.8)
23.1 ?(10.4, 12.7)
-192%
30.8 ?(14, 16.8)
-290%
7 ?(2, 5)
11%
14.5 ?(4.7, 9.8)
-84%
21 ?(12, 9)
-166%
PWM Frequency
156000 ?(50)
Screen
3%
-66%
-14%
-59%
-50%
Brightness middle
546
396
-27%
517.3
-5%
595
9%
421
-23%
678
24%
Brightness
564
379
-33%
488
-13%
550
-2%
416
-26%
745
32%
Brightness Distribution
86
92
7%
88
2%
85
-1%
89
3%
69
-20%
Black Level *
0.38
0.26
32%
0.34
11%
0.25
34%
0.28
26%
0.33
13%
Contrast
1437
1523
6%
1521
6%
2380
66%
1504
5%
2055
43%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
1.3
-0%
3.3
-154%
2.01
-55%
3.2
-146%
3.56
-174%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.3
2.7
49%
7.81
-47%
6.9
-30%
5.5
-4%
7.23
-36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.2
0.7
42%
1.02
15%
1.22
-2%
2
-67%
1.05
12%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.1
1.6
-45%
5.6
-409%
2.74
-149%
4.4
-300%
4.93
-348%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.14 103%
2.37 93%
2.4 92%
2.22 99%
2.63 84%
CCT
6463 101%
6554 99%
6804 96%
6319 103%
6384 102%
7114 91%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-67% / -28%
-131% / -90%
-14% / -13%
-63% / -57%
-74% / -58%

* ... smaller is better

卡尔曼灰度（目标色彩空间 P3）
卡尔曼灰度（目标色彩空间 P3）
CalMAN 饱和度（目标色彩空间 P3）
CalMAN 饱和度（目标色彩空间 P3）
CalMAN ColorChecker（目标色彩空间 P3）
CalMAN ColorChecker（目标色彩空间 P3）
CalMAN 灰度校准（目标色彩空间 P3）
CalMAN 灰度校准（目标色彩空间 P3）
CalMAN 饱和度校准（目标色彩空间 P3）
CalMAN 饱和度校准（目标色彩空间 P3）
CalMAN ColorChecker 已校准（目标色彩空间 P3）
CalMAN ColorChecker 已校准（目标色彩空间 P3）

面板在交付时已经进行了很好的校准。我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件（X-Rite i1 Pro 2）进行分析后发现，灰度显示已经达到了参考水平，没有任何偏色现象。在色彩方面，只有蓝色超过了 3 的重要偏差，我们无法通过自己的校准进行纠正。P3 色彩空间已完全覆盖，但没有将色彩空间切换为 sRGB 的选项。

对比 sRGB
对比 sRGB
对 P3
对 P3
对比 AdobeRGB
对比 AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
7.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.1 ms rise
↘ 3.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.8 ms rise
↘ 7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在阳光下
在阳光下
在树荫下
在树荫下

由于屏幕亮度高，您经常可以在室外找到可以正常工作的地方。不过，应避免阳光直射。可视角度的稳定性总体不错，但图像很快就会变亮，尤其是从上方的角度看。这里有更好的 IPS 面板可供选择。

视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 - Ryzen Zen4 Phoenix

惠普为 EliteBook 845 G10 配备了 AMD 最新的 Ryzen CPU。我们的测试设备使用的是速度最快的 35 瓦Ryzen 9 Pro 7940HS 。此外，还可选配 U 系列的 Ryzen 5 或 Ryzen 7 型号。我们的测试设备还配备了 32 GB 内存模块，这会对图形性能产生负面影响。当然，这并不是商务笔记本电脑最重要的因素，但不利用这些硬件也没什么意义。我们还在双通道配置（2x 16GB DDR5-5600）下运行了一些图形处理器和游戏基准测试。

 
 

测试条件

惠普没有提供任何额外的能耗设置，而是使用常规的 Windows 配置文件。Ryzen 9 Pro 7940HS 的最大功耗为 51 瓦，但在最节能模式下为 35 瓦。这也是 HS 处理器的缺点，因为用户在日常办公使用中并不一定需要这么大的功率。U 系列芯片在这方面应该更有优势，因为它们可以配置更低的功耗限制。

处理器 - Ryzen 9 Pro 7940HS

产品 Ryzen 9 Pro 7940HSRyzen 9 Pro 7940HS 是 AMD 当前的 Phoenix 系列产品，提供 8 个 Zen4 内核。该芯片采用现代 4 纳米工艺制造，最多可同时运行 16 个线程。该芯片的最大功耗为 51 瓦，永久功耗为 41 瓦，因此在基准测试中取得了非常好的成绩。总体而言，性能保持非常稳定，至少在多核基准测试中明显超越了所有其他对比设备。与去年的 EliteBook 845 G9的 Ryzen 9 Pro 6950HS平均优势为 19%，但单核性能仅有微弱提升。英特尔在性能内核方面仍有优势，不过功耗也更高。在电池供电情况下，CPU 性能保持不变。更多 CPU 基准测试可在 技术部分.

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

012024036048060072084096010801200132014401560168018001920204021602280Tooltip
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS: Ø2330 (2299.38-2359.74)
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U: Ø1600 (1589.76-1685.63)
Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U: Ø1310 (929.37-1541.9)
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P: Ø1613 (1476.83-1993.62)
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1988 (1948.94-2166.26)
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS: Ø1893 (1872.75-1912.59)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
 
83.8 pt
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
78.7 pt
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
78.5 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P
73.3 pt
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
65.3 pt
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U
64.3 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
63.4 pt
Average of class Office
 
57.9 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (14919 - 16938, n=3)
15603 Points +5%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
14919 Points
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
14917 Points 0%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P
11571 Points -22%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
11515 (11150.7min - 11515.3max) Points -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
10031 Points -33%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U
9795 (7630.48min - 9794.71max) Points -34%
Average of class Office
  (1577 - 15743, n=93, last 2 years)
9321 Points -38%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P
1848 Points +18%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U
1757 Points +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (1568 - 1794, n=3)
1708 Points +9%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
1678 Points +7%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
1568 Points
Average of class Office
  (618 - 1995, n=93, last 2 years)
1556 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
1520 Points -3%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
1514 Points -3%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (5790 - 6601, n=3)
6068 Points +5%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
5790 Points
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
5762 Points 0%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
4577 Points -21%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P
4526 Points -22%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
3879 Points -33%
Average of class Office
  (590 - 5980, n=92, last 2 years)
3613 Points -38%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U
3610 Points -38%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P
719 Points +18%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
701 Points +15%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (611 - 695, n=3)
665 Points +9%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U
656 Points +7%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
611 Points
Average of class Office
  (229 - 766, n=92, last 2 years)
603 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
594 Points -3%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
591 Points -3%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (2356 - 2718, n=3)
2478 Points +5%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2360 (2299.38min - 2359.74max) Points
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
2166 (1948.94min - 2166.26max) Points -8%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P
2008 Points -15%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
1913 (1872.75min - 1912.59max) Points -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
1686 (1589.76min - 1685.63max) Points -29%
Average of class Office
  (246 - 2642, n=95, last 2 years)
1561 Points -34%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U
1542 (929.37min - 1541.9max) Points -35%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P
267 Points +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (247 - 280, n=3)
267 Points +8%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
263 Points +6%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
247 Points
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U
244 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
241 Points -2%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
239 Points -3%
Average of class Office
  (98 - 284, n=94, last 2 years)
230 Points -7%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Office
  (208 - 1956, n=94, last 2 years)
425 Seconds * -98%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U
332 Seconds * -54%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
306 Seconds * -42%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P
295 Seconds * -37%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
264 Seconds * -23%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
262 Seconds * -22%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
215 Seconds *
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (191 - 215, n=3)
207 Seconds * +4%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (61111 - 67813, n=3)
63409 MIPS +3%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
61303 MIPS
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
50517 MIPS -18%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
49474 MIPS -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
48204 MIPS -21%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P
45679 MIPS -25%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U
40563 MIPS -34%
Average of class Office
  (7532 - 65460, n=95, last 2 years)
38720 MIPS -37%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (5844 - 6497, n=3)
6185 MIPS +6%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
5844 MIPS
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
5833 MIPS 0%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P
5717 MIPS -2%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
5516 MIPS -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
5338 MIPS -9%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U
5296 MIPS -9%
Average of class Office
  (2972 - 6687, n=94, last 2 years)
5245 MIPS -10%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
10976 Points +11%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (9897 - 12038, n=3)
10631 Points +7%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
9897 Points
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P
8909 Points -10%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U
8263 Points -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
7884 Points -20%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
7664 Points -23%
Average of class Office
  (1018 - 11980, n=94, last 2 years)
7537 Points -24%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (1758 - 1969, n=3)
1894 Points +8%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P
1792 Points +2%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
1778 Points +1%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
1758 Points
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U
1710 Points -3%
Average of class Office
  (510 - 1995, n=95, last 2 years)
1582 Points -10%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
1549 Points -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
1481 Points -16%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (17 - 20.4, n=3)
18.2 fps +7%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
17 fps
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
13.8 fps -19%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
12.8 fps -25%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P
12.7 fps -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
12.4 fps -27%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U
10.8 fps -36%
Average of class Office
  (1.72 - 18.7, n=92, last 2 years)
10.5 fps -38%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
66.2 s * -31%
Average of class Office
  (31.3 - 129.6, n=92, last 2 years)
53.6 s * -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
51.8 s * -3%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
50.5 s *
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (46.1 - 55, n=3)
50.5 s * -0%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U
45.5 s * +10%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
42.8 s * +15%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P
40.3 s * +20%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Office
  (0.4244 - 1.135, n=91, last 2 years)
0.549 sec * -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
0.518 sec * -7%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
0.511 sec * -6%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U
0.4948 sec * -2%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
0.4835 sec *
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (0.4462 - 0.4835, n=3)
0.4604 sec * +5%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4587 sec * +5%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P
0.4578 sec * +5%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2360 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
137 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.9 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
247 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5790 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
611 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1568 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
14919 Points
Help
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
 
95.8 pt
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
90.9 pt
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M
69.5 pt
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
64.7 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
60.8 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
60.6 pt
Average of class Office
 
50.3 pt
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
48.6 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (24034 - 27411, n=3)
25232 KRay/s +4%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
24250 KRay/s
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M
14040 KRay/s -42%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
12366 KRay/s -49%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
11296 KRay/s -53%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
9618 KRay/s -60%
Average of class Office
  (763 - 24250, n=93, last 2 years)
9509 KRay/s -61%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
8830 KRay/s -64%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (101262 - 116960, n=3)
106817 Points +5%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
101262 Points
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M
88935 Points -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
72393 Points -29%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
61721 Points -39%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
48441 Points -52%
Average of class Office
  (4113 - 102228, n=93, last 2 years)
47876 Points -53%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
43149 Points -57%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (4418 - 4944, n=3)
4601 MB/s +4%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
4418 MB/s
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M
3000 MB/s -32%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2850 MB/s -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
2421 MB/s -45%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2404 MB/s -46%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
2265 MB/s -49%
Average of class Office
  (287 - 4551, n=93, last 2 years)
2264 MB/s -49%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (112873 - 124565, n=3)
116818 Points +3%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
113016 Points
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M
97802 Points -13%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
91588 Points -19%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
89068 Points -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
87943 Points -22%
Average of class Office
  (8185 - 115197, n=93, last 2 years)
69271 Points -39%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
62953 Points -44%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (14147 - 15304, n=3)
14580 Points +3%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
14147 Points
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M
12369 Points -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
11085 Points -22%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
8278 Points -41%
Average of class Office
  (404 - 14288, n=93, last 2 years)
6693 Points -53%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
6597 Points -53%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
5206 Points -63%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (54003 - 62357, n=3)
56908 Points +5%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
54003 Points
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M
48895 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
39771 Points -26%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
30137 Points -44%
Average of class Office
  (2075 - 54365, n=93, last 2 years)
25024 Points -54%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
23884 Points -56%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
21556 Points -60%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
87671 MB/s +15%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (76133 - 88705, n=3)
81890 MB/s +8%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
76133 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
69002 MB/s -9%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M
58851 MB/s -23%
Average of class Office
  (7254 - 155900, n=93, last 2 years)
51765 MB/s -32%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
47956 MB/s -37%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
41994 MB/s -45%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (976 - 1079, n=3)
1014 MB/s +3%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
987 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
962 MB/s -3%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M
753 MB/s -24%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
686 MB/s -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
650 MB/s -34%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
640 MB/s -35%
Average of class Office
  (78 - 1018, n=93, last 2 years)
606 MB/s -39%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (12715 - 14590, n=3)
13353 KRay/s +5%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
12755 KRay/s
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M
7053 KRay/s -45%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
6587 KRay/s -48%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
5967 KRay/s -53%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5193 KRay/s -59%
Average of class Office
  (432 - 12755, n=93, last 2 years)
5039 KRay/s -60%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
4640 KRay/s -64%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
44535 MPixel/s +85%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
39231 MPixel/s +63%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
29949 MPixel/s +25%
Average of class Office
  (4814 - 54971, n=93, last 2 years)
29143 MPixel/s +21%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (24030 - 37800, n=3)
28713 MPixel/s +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
25949 MPixel/s +8%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
24030 MPixel/s
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M
18989 MPixel/s -21%

系统性能

在日常使用中，EliteBook 845 G10 是一款反应非常灵敏的笔记本电脑，内存的单通道配置也没有带来负面影响。合成基准测试结果也不错；只有在跨系统 CrossMark 测试中，AMD 系统的表现稍弱。测试过程中没有出现任何问题，我们也能顺利升级内存。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (6523 - 6825, n=2)
6674 Points +2%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6623 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6523 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
6152 Points -6%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
Radeon 680M, R9 PRO 6950HS, WDC PC SN810 1TB
5896 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
5672 Points -13%
Average of class Office
  (2463 - 7344, n=86, last 2 years)
5627 Points -14%
Dell Latitude 7440
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1345U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
5554 Points -15%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Dell Latitude 7440
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1345U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
10758 Points +9%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10440 Points +6%
Average of class Office
  (5575 - 20841, n=86, last 2 years)
10099 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (9873 - 9930, n=2)
9902 Points 0%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
9883 Points 0%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
9873 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
9848 Points 0%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
Radeon 680M, R9 PRO 6950HS, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9311 Points -6%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (9192 - 10198, n=2)
9695 Points +5%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
9192 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
8891 Points -3%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8530 Points -7%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
Radeon 680M, R9 PRO 6950HS, WDC PC SN810 1TB
8187 Points -11%
Average of class Office
  (3041 - 10415, n=86, last 2 years)
7746 Points -16%
Dell Latitude 7440
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1345U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
7189 Points -22%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
7180 Points -22%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8855 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (8299 - 8518, n=2)
8409 Points +1%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
8299 Points
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
Radeon 680M, R9 PRO 6950HS, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7298 Points -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
7217 Points -13%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
6982 Points -16%
Average of class Office
  (2049 - 9773, n=86, last 2 years)
6351 Points -23%
Dell Latitude 7440
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1345U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
6012 Points -28%
CrossMark / Overall
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
1876 Points +32%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1654 Points +16%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (1423 - 1635, n=2)
1529 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
1430 Points 0%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1423 Points
Average of class Office
  (348 - 1891, n=88, last 2 years)
1398 Points -2%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
Radeon 680M, R9 PRO 6950HS, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1345 Points -5%
CrossMark / Productivity
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
1829 Points +31%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1625 Points +16%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (1400 - 1620, n=2)
1510 Points +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
1426 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1400 Points
Average of class Office
  (393 - 1870, n=88, last 2 years)
1395 Points 0%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
Radeon 680M, R9 PRO 6950HS, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1389 Points -1%
CrossMark / Creativity
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
1917 Points +24%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1727 Points +11%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (1549 - 1754, n=2)
1652 Points +7%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1549 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
1523 Points -2%
Average of class Office
  (340 - 1982, n=88, last 2 years)
1457 Points -6%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
Radeon 680M, R9 PRO 6950HS, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1376 Points -11%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
1899 Points +64%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1531 Points +32%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (1161 - 1362, n=2)
1262 Points +9%
Average of class Office
  (258 - 2017, n=88, last 2 years)
1259 Points +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
1194 Points +3%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1161 Points
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
Radeon 680M, R9 PRO 6950HS, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1142 Points -2%
PCMark 10 Score
6523 points
Help
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
64187 MB/s +84%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
57716 MB/s +65%
Average of class Office
  (7158 - 108783, n=94, last 2 years)
49489 MB/s +42%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
47829 MB/s +37%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
47562 MB/s +36%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (34339 - 66740, n=3)
45339 MB/s +30%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
34938 MB/s
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M
31160 MB/s -11%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
63509 MB/s +110%
Average of class Office
  (7325 - 127282, n=94, last 2 years)
50494 MB/s +67%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
50185 MB/s +66%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
39944 MB/s +32%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
37476 MB/s +24%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (30289 - 50398, n=3)
37088 MB/s +22%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M
34753 MB/s +15%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
30289 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
83155 MB/s +107%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
72373 MB/s +80%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (39877 - 91516, n=3)
57187 MB/s +42%
Average of class Office
  (7579 - 117935, n=94, last 2 years)
53522 MB/s +33%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
50920 MB/s +27%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
47179 MB/s +17%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
40169 MB/s
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M
33060 MB/s -18%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
115.9 ns * -13%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
  (102.2 - 121.3, n=3)
108.7 ns * -6%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
106.4 ns * -4%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
102.6 ns *
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
102.1 ns * -0%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M
99.7 ns * +3%
Average of class Office
  (6.9 - 185.2, n=93, last 2 years)
97.1 ns * +5%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
92.7 ns * +10%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在目前的 BIOS 版本下，测试设备在我们的标准化延迟测试（网页浏览、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）中没有显示出任何限制。因此，使用实时音频应用程序不会出现错误。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
6070.1 μs * -770%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
Radeon 680M, R9 PRO 6950HS, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1220 μs * -75%
Dell Latitude 7440
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1345U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
1203.08 μs * -73%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
868.4 μs * -25%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
697.4 μs *
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
545.7 μs * +22%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

可更换 M.2 2280 固态硬盘（PCIe 4.0）
可更换 M.2 2280 固态硬盘（PCIe 4.0）

惠普为 EliteBook 845 G10 配备了一个用于 M.2 2280 固态硬盘的快速 PCIe 4.0 插槽，我们的测试设备安装了 1 TB 版本的 SK hynix PC801，首次启动时可使用 895 GB。传输速率总体上非常不错，在长时间负载情况下也没有出现性能下降。更多固态硬盘基准测试这里.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7123 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5911 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 422 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 441 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 62.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 127.8 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 469 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1096 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
92.7 pt
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
 
80.5 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
 
69.6 pt
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
68.4 pt
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
WDC PC SN810 1TB
59.1 pt
Average of class Office
 
53 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
47.9 pt
Dell Latitude 7440
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
44.2 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3878 (3830.24min - 3878.26max) MB/s +30%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (2511 - 5665, n=18)
3832 MB/s +28%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3391 (3051.13min - 3390.68max) MB/s +13%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2989 (2968.66min - 2989.28max) MB/s
Average of class Office
  (121 - 4554, n=90, last 2 years)
2691 MB/s -10%
Dell Latitude 7440
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
2443 (2427.84min - 2443.39max) MB/s -18%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
 
2089 (1958.25min - 2089.39max) MB/s -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
1814 (1799.32min - 1814.39max) MB/s -39%
seq write
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4000 (3970.36min - 3999.69max) MB/s +12%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (1690 - 5181, n=18)
3776 MB/s +6%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
 
3772 (213.28min - 3772.36max) MB/s +6%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3566 (3496.37min - 3566.41max) MB/s
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3403 (3306.47min - 3402.84max) MB/s -5%
Average of class Office
  (43 - 5842, n=90, last 2 years)
2614 MB/s -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
2284 (2236.61min - 2283.64max) MB/s -36%
Dell Latitude 7440
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
1776 (1737.28min - 1776.3max) MB/s -50%
seq q8 t1 read
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (6508 - 7177, n=18)
6917 MB/s +4%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
WDC PC SN810 1TB
6878 (6719.69min - 6878.45max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6876 (6162.32min - 6876.44max) MB/s +3%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6683 (6134.38min - 6682.57max) MB/s
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
 
4886 (4359.86min - 4886.36max) MB/s -27%
Average of class Office
  (124.2 - 7120, n=90, last 2 years)
4464 MB/s -33%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
3569 (3249.75min - 3568.72max) MB/s -47%
Dell Latitude 7440
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
3519 (2577.61min - 3518.81max) MB/s -47%
seq q8 t1 write
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6037 (6002.26min - 6037.19max) MB/s
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (2382 - 6159, n=18)
5647 MB/s -6%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5097 (4682.59min - 5097max) MB/s -16%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4970 (4966.69min - 4970.17max) MB/s -18%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
 
3881 (113.46min - 3881.41max) MB/s -36%
Average of class Office
  (46.7 - 6791, n=90, last 2 years)
3454 MB/s -43%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
3296 (3265.03min - 3296.3max) MB/s -45%
Dell Latitude 7440
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
2210 (2175.38min - 2210.17max) MB/s -63%
4k q1 t1 read
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
88.6 (88.22min - 88.59max) MB/s +46%
Dell Latitude 7440
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
78.8 (76.59min - 78.83max) MB/s +30%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (54.3 - 85, n=18)
68.9 MB/s +14%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
60.7 (60min - 60.68max) MB/s
Average of class Office
  (5.55 - 89.9, n=90, last 2 years)
58.3 MB/s -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
52.8 (52.12min - 52.82max) MB/s -13%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
WDC PC SN810 1TB
52.4 (51.33min - 52.35max) MB/s -14%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
 
43.7 (23.85min - 43.65max) MB/s -28%
4k q1 t1 write
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
 
360 (353.95min - 359.55max) MB/s +172%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
224 (221.2min - 223.61max) MB/s +69%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (77.7 - 335, n=18)
192.3 MB/s +45%
Average of class Office
  (1.23 - 429, n=90, last 2 years)
164.2 MB/s +24%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
136 (132.51min - 136.03max) MB/s +3%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
132.4 (130.43min - 132.37max) MB/s
Dell Latitude 7440
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
131.4 (129.27min - 131.42max) MB/s -1%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
WDC PC SN810 1TB
126.8 (125.06min - 126.77max) MB/s -4%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3484 (3457.82min - 3484.34max) MB/s +255%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
 
2252 (2223.45min - 2252.41max) MB/s +130%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (353 - 5829, n=18)
2082 MB/s +112%
Average of class Office
  (7.49 - 4425, n=90, last 2 years)
1246 MB/s +27%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1042 (982.95min - 1042.32max) MB/s +6%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
981 (956.75min - 980.97max) MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
810 (760.4min - 810.14max) MB/s -17%
Dell Latitude 7440
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
476 (466.05min - 475.52max) MB/s -51%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2554 (2537.7min - 2554.39max) MB/s +460%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
 
1611 (217.51min - 1610.59max) MB/s +253%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (148.5 - 3719, n=18)
1210 MB/s +165%
Average of class Office
  (1.5 - 3254, n=90, last 2 years)
926 MB/s +103%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
456 (447.45min - 455.69max) MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
418 (406.66min - 418.33max) MB/s -8%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
WDC PC SN810 1TB
407 (392.45min - 407.12max) MB/s -11%
Dell Latitude 7440
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
360 (355.44min - 360.36max) MB/s -21%
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8363 Points +41%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (4390 - 10562, n=18)
6931 Points +17%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
 
6213 Points +5%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5918 Points
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4459 Points -25%
Average of class Office
  (704 - 9204, n=87, last 2 years)
4198 Points -29%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
3837 Points -35%
Dell Latitude 7440
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
3533 Points -40%
Score Read
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3090 Points +118%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
 
2872 Points +102%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (953 - 3793, n=18)
1997 Points +41%
Average of class Office
  (252 - 3364, n=87, last 2 years)
1464 Points +3%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1419 Points
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1353 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
1090 Points -23%
Dell Latitude 7440
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
1028 Points -28%
Score Write
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (2690 - 5157, n=18)
3976 Points +4%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3831 Points
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3765 Points -2%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2475 Points -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
2234 Points -42%
Dell Latitude 7440
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
2029 Points -47%
Average of class Office
  (247 - 4111, n=87, last 2 years)
2027 Points -47%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
 
1894 Points -51%
Seq Read
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5315 MB/s +24%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (3522 - 5892, n=18)
5299 MB/s +24%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
4270 MB/s
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
 
3934 MB/s -8%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3823 MB/s -10%
Average of class Office
  (508 - 5796, n=87, last 2 years)
3494 MB/s -18%
Dell Latitude 7440
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
3017.95 MB/s -29%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
2860 MB/s -33%
Seq Write
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (2489 - 5880, n=18)
3846 MB/s +35%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3766 MB/s +32%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
 
3205 MB/s +12%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2853 MB/s
Average of class Office
  (294 - 5880, n=87, last 2 years)
2394 MB/s -16%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2378 MB/s -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
1718 MB/s -40%
Dell Latitude 7440
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
1520.78 MB/s -47%
4K Read
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
 
96.2 MB/s +63%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
80.26 MB/s +36%
Dell Latitude 7440
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
72.35 MB/s +23%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (56 - 79.4, n=18)
66.1 MB/s +12%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
59 MB/s
Average of class Office
  (18 - 91.1, n=87, last 2 years)
58.1 MB/s -2%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
WDC PC SN810 1TB
53 MB/s -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
51.93 MB/s -12%
4K Write
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (144.4 - 286, n=18)
220 MB/s +45%
Dell Latitude 7440
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
197.6 MB/s +30%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
192.61 MB/s +27%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
 
189.9 MB/s +25%
Average of class Office
  (28.2 - 350, n=87, last 2 years)
166.8 MB/s +10%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
152 MB/s
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
WDC PC SN810 1TB
139 MB/s -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
135.21 MB/s -11%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2478.53 MB/s +166%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
 
2382 MB/s +155%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (359 - 3131, n=18)
1401 MB/s +50%
Average of class Office
  (182.3 - 2713, n=87, last 2 years)
1057 MB/s +13%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
933 MB/s
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
WDC PC SN810 1TB
917 MB/s -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
751.92 MB/s -19%
Dell Latitude 7440
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
654.24 MB/s -30%
4K-64 Write
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3394 MB/s
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (2206 - 4381, n=18)
3371 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3195.52 MB/s -6%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2097 MB/s -38%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
1926.82 MB/s -43%
Dell Latitude 7440
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
1678.93 MB/s -51%
Average of class Office
  (183.4 - 3394, n=87, last 2 years)
1621 MB/s -52%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
 
1384 MB/s -59%
Access Time Read
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
 
0.136 ms * -339%
Dell Latitude 7440
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
0.098 ms * -216%
Average of class Office
  (0.022 - 0.302, n=87, last 2 years)
0.08 ms * -158%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.074 ms * -139%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
0.061 ms * -97%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (0.017 - 0.062, n=18)
0.03817 ms * -23%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
0.031 ms *
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.022 ms * +29%
Access Time Write
Dell Latitude 7440
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
0.091 ms * -264%
Average of class Office
  (0.016 - 0.625, n=87, last 2 years)
0.06994 ms * -180%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (0.017 - 0.069, n=18)
0.03561 ms * -42%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
 
0.03 ms * -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
0.028 ms * -12%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.026 ms * -4%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
0.025 ms *
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.022 ms * +12%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

03306609901320165019802310264029703300363039604290462049505280561059406270Tooltip
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA: Ø6531 (5688.05-6597.22)

图形卡

GPU-Z Radeon 780M
GPU-Z Radeon 780M

图形处理由集成的 Radeon 780M。发货时，我们的测试设备上还安装着 4 月份的预览版驱动程序，但我们安装了新的 Adrenalin（23.7.2 版），它并没有带来任何速度优势。图形性能受到内存单通道配置的严重限制，因此 780M 无法充分发挥其潜力。因此，图形性能与 Iris Xe Graphics G7与英特尔的 Iris Xe Graphics G7 大致相当，仅略高于 AMD 的 Vega 8。用户可以通过双通道配置轻松提升图形处理性能，不过对于商务笔记本电脑来说，这肯定不是首要任务。如我们的 iGPU 测试所示，第二根内存条的平均性能提高了 65%。 我们对 iGPU 的测试中已经表明。总之，性能几乎与旧版的 Radeon 680M.

在电池模式下，GPU 性能没有降低，在持续负载下，数值保持稳定。更多 GPU 基准测试这里。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
100 pt
Average AMD Radeon 780M
 
64.4 pt
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
62.9 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
49.8 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
39.7 pt
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
38.2 pt
Average of class Office
 
37.7 pt
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
33.9 pt
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1345U
32 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
16904 Points +115%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (7868 - 14249, n=56)
12460 Points +58%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (Dual-Channel)
11811 Points +50%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
9608 Points +22%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
7868 Points
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
7179 Points -9%
Average of class Office
  (1468 - 13132, n=89, last 2 years)
6812 Points -13%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
6752 Points -14%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1345U
5485 Points -30%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
12349 Points +171%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (Dual-Channel)
7800 Points +71%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (4550 - 8816, n=58)
7747 Points +70%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
6431 Points +41%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
5477 Points +20%
Average of class Office
  (736 - 9375, n=91, last 2 years)
4858 Points +7%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
4550 Points
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1345U
4442 Points -2%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
3791 Points -17%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
4773 Points +219%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (1496 - 3196, n=58)
2713 Points +81%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (Dual-Channel)
2659 Points +78%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
1938 Points +30%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
1656 Points +11%
Average of class Office
  (313 - 4109, n=90, last 2 years)
1603 Points +7%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
1496 Points
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
1359 Points -9%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1345U
1318 Points -12%
3DMark 11 Performance
7732 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
25056 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
4187 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1707 points
Help
Blender: v3.3 Classroom CPU | v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Office
  (343 - 3964, n=90, last 2 years)
762 Seconds * -121%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1345U
632 Seconds * -83%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
537 Seconds * -56%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
528 Seconds * -53%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
456 Seconds * -32%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (300 - 664, n=54)
375 Seconds * -9%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
345 Seconds *
Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Average of class Office
  (298 - 1215, n=14, last 2 years)
739 Seconds *
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
322 Seconds *
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Office
  (94 - 236, n=4, last 2 years)
135.5 Seconds *
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
53 Seconds *
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Office
  (155 - 262, n=4, last 2 years)
188.8 Seconds *
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
91 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

如果下班后想在 EliteBook 845 G10 上玩游戏，一定要安装第二条内存，因为在游戏基准测试中，单通道配置的优势高达 55%。总体而言，性能值与旧版的Radeon 680M。在实际应用中，这足以在众多游戏中以中高细节在 1080p 下流畅地玩游戏。在电池模式下，性能保持稳定，长时间游戏时也不会出现性能下降。

Performance Rating | The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
100 pt
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
49.7 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE -1!
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M
46.6 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
38.3 pt
Average of class Office
 
33.3 pt
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, AMD Radeon 680M
32.2 pt
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
32.1 pt
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
30 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
44.2 (42min, 42P1) fps +209%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M
24.5 (19min) fps +71%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (Dual-Channel)
24 fps +68%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
16.4 fps +15%
Average of class Office
  (3.8 - 34, n=74, last 2 years)
14.8 fps +3%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, AMD Radeon 680M
14.6 fps +2%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
14.3 (12min, 13P1) fps
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
13.4 (12min) fps -6%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
67.5 (9.08min, 43.5P1) fps +453%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (Dual-Channel)
22.3 (3.35min, 15.4P1) fps +83%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, AMD Radeon 680M
20 (4.3min, 15.9P1) fps +64%
Average of class Office
  (3.35 - 47.8, n=79, last 2 years)
12.9 fps +6%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
12.2 (4.27min, 8.4P1) fps
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
11.5 (6.52min, 7.87P1) fps -6%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
8.81 (4.42min, 5.46P1) fps -28%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)
50.1 fps +215%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1.3, Dual-Channel)
26.7 fps +68%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M (1.3)
21.7 fps +36%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1.3)
19 fps +19%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1.3)
16.8 fps +6%
Average of class Office
  (3.86 - 35.7, n=87, last 2 years)
16.1 fps +1%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1.3)
15.9 fps
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, AMD Radeon 680M (1.3)
12.9 fps -19%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
86 (52.1min, 63.8P1) fps +244%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Dual-Channel)
45.2 (23.1min, 34.8P1) fps +81%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
38.3 (9.8min, 26.4P1) fps +53%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
28.7 (6.7min, 10.1P1) fps +15%
Average of class Office
  (9.6 - 56.5, n=70, last 2 years)
27.3 fps +9%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
25 (17.4min, 19.8P1) fps
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, AMD Radeon 680M (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
22.6 (16.5min, 17.5P1) fps -10%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
21.9 (5min, 6.24P1) fps -12%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
109.1 (95.7min) fps +112%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (Dual-Channel)
71.6 (59.9min) fps +39%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
59.6 (50.1min) fps +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M
56.6 (49min) fps +10%
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
56.3 (41.5min) fps +9%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
51.5 (43.1min) fps
Average of class Office
  (13.4 - 121.2, n=95, last 2 years)
51.2 fps -1%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, AMD Radeon 680M
47.4 (41.4min) fps -8%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
82.3 fps +192%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
40.8 fps +45%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (Dual-Channel)
32.2 fps +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M
31.2 fps +11%
Average of class Office
  (8.88 - 92.6, n=91, last 2 years)
29.9 fps +6%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, AMD Radeon 680M
28.9 fps +2%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
28.2 fps
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
21.3 fps -24%
The Witcher 3 | F1 22 | F1 23 | Far Cry 5 | Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
44.2 (42min, 42P1) fps +209%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (14.3 - 36, n=47)
28 fps +96%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M
24.5 (19min) fps +71%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (Dual-Channel)
24 fps +68%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
16.4 fps +15%
Average of class Office
  (3.8 - 34, n=74, last 2 years)
14.8 fps +3%
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, AMD Radeon 680M
14.6 fps +2%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
14.3 (12min, 13P1) fps
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
13.4 (12min) fps -6%
F1 22 - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (923650)
93 (74min, 63P1) fps +193%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (31.7 - 70.6, n=33)
55.9 fps +76%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (Dual-Channel)
52 (45min, 41P1) fps +64%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (959964)
33.6 (29min, 27P1) fps +6%
Average of class Office
  (16.5 - 68.5, n=36, last 2 years)
32.6 fps +3%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (959964)
31.7 (26min, 23P1) fps
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (959964)
25.6 (21min, 21P1) fps -19%
F1 23 - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (27.3 - 61.1, n=31)
49.4 fps +70%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (Dual-Channel)
48.1 (37min, 29P1) fps +65%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1012607)
29.1 (25min, 22P1) fps
Average of class Office
  (8.64 - 48.1, n=23, last 2 years)
26.5 fps -9%
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
79 fps +259%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (21 - 49, n=46)
38.9 fps +77%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (Dual-Channel)
36 fps +64%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
29 (26min) fps +32%
Average of class Office
  (9 - 52, n=45, last 2 years)
24.8 fps +13%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
22 fps
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, AMD Radeon 680M
18 (16min) fps -18%
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 - 1920x1080 High Preset
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
40 fps +233%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (12 - 30.5, n=12)
22.7 fps +89%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (Dual-Channel)
20 fps +67%
Average of class Office
  (6.33 - 24.6, n=8, last 2 years)
15.1 fps +26%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
12 fps
Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
11.3 (8.8min) fps -6%

Witcher 3 FPS chart

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M: Ø14.3 (12-16)
lowmed.highultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 100.5 91.2 32.5 12.2
The Witcher 3 (2015) 74 22 14.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 122.7 94.9 54.9 51.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 41.8 21 15.9 11.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 45.9 33.1 28.2
Far Cry 5 (2018) 48 24 22 21
Strange Brigade (2018) 83.3 33.3 28.9 25
F1 2021 (2021) 112.6 53.9 41.6 18.3
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 22 16 12
F1 22 (2022) 47 41.5 31.7
F1 23 (2023) 44.9 39.9 29.1

排放 - 仅有一个风扇的 EliteBook

噪音

用一个风扇冷却
用一个风扇冷却

EliteBook 845 G10 最大的弱点可能就是单风扇和 35 瓦处理器的组合。空闲时，后者几乎总是处于关闭状态，但即使是轻量级任务也会导致风扇过快启动。这也适用于最高效的性能模式，因为 CPU 在此模式下的功耗仍为 35 瓦。在负载情况下，风扇噪音会迅速增加到 43 dB(A)，非常明显。此外，风扇转速总是有些脉动，听起来很不稳定，从长远来看可能会令人讨厌。同样，我们认为配备 U 系列处理器的机型在日常使用中表现更好。除此之外，我们的测试设备没有听到其他电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle
25.3 / 25.3 / 25.3 dB(A)
Load
34.4 / 43.4 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 25.3 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.444.534.535.139.82526.930.624.728.829.83128.33627.932.633.24034.836.132.238.433.65027.729.729.326.930.96331.131.824.225.833.88022.719.519.321.419.510020.221.32119.219.612520.621.619.5192016019.819.719.6172020022.420.419.417.921.925025.822.522.217.824.231526.724.223.716.225.140028.225.522.514.123.850028.626.722.213.225.463031.227.422.312.827.480032.127.924.313.128.3100031.627.822.813.327.6125030.326.122.112.226.6160030.32622.41227.3200032.929.423.711.428.9250034.830.924.812.430.7315032.328.122.91428.5400032.529.123.512.430.4500032.226.620.512.927.1630029.123.517.614.923.8800024.118.815.21319.81000020.215.815.113.115.41250016.514.314.81313.61600013.112.212.512.512.8SPL43.439.434.425.339.6N4.33.120.73.1median 28.6median 25.5median 22.2median 13.1median 25.1Delta5.23.82.81.64hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N		Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N		Dell Latitude 7440
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1345U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV		Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P		SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW		HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
Radeon 680M, R9 PRO 6950HS, WDC PC SN810 1TB
Noise
21%
15%
-6%
-7%
-3%
off / environment *
25.3
22.8
10%
22.8
10%
25.4
-0%
24.4
4%
25.5
-1%
Idle Minimum *
25.3
22.8
10%
22.8
10%
25.4
-0%
24.4
4%
25.5
-1%
Idle Average *
25.3
22.8
10%
22.8
10%
25.4
-0%
24.4
4%
25.5
-1%
Idle Maximum *
25.3
22.8
10%
22.8
10%
29.6
-17%
27.8
-10%
25.5
-1%
Load Average *
34.4
22.8
34%
26.3
24%
42
-22%
43.3
-26%
38.1
-11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
43.4
27.5
37%
30
31%
48.2
-11%
Load Maximum *
43.4
27.3
37%
38.3
12%
40.9
6%
48.8
-12%
44
-1%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在日常使用中不会出现温度问题，但如果长时间对处理器施加压力，底部中央后部区域会明显发热，我们在这里测得的温度超过 50 °C。由于采用了单风扇，机箱左侧的温度也明显升高。在负载状态下打字时，这种情况也很明显，但没有任何限制。CPU 的功耗很快稳定在 41 瓦，并保持在这一水平。

CPU/iGPU 数据 - 压力测试
CPU/iGPU 数据 - 压力测试
Max. Load
 44.8 °C45.6 °C40.4 °C 
 43.6 °C43.9 °C37.9 °C 
 36.2 °C31.5 °C29 °C 
Maximum: 45.6 °C
Average: 39.2 °C
39.5 °C51.9 °C47.7 °C
33.9 °C48.1 °C45.7 °C
31.2 °C35.6 °C37.2 °C
Maximum: 51.9 °C
Average: 41.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  46.3 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.9 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.2 °C / 97.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-8.6 °C / -15.5 F).
应力测试期间的表面温度（顶部）
应力测试期间的表面温度（顶部）
应力测试期间的表面温度（底部）
应力测试期间的表面温度（底部）
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M		Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M		Dell Latitude 7440
Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs		Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs		SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU		HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, AMD Radeon 680M
Heat
2%
6%
-11%
-7%
-8%
Maximum Upper Side *
45.6
49.2
-8%
39
14%
46.5
-2%
48.4
-6%
49.4
-8%
Maximum Bottom *
51.9
37.2
28%
40.6
22%
44.7
14%
57.1
-10%
48
8%
Idle Upper Side *
26.5
31.1
-17%
28
-6%
34.9
-32%
28.1
-6%
30.8
-16%
Idle Bottom *
27
26
4%
28.8
-7%
32.9
-22%
29
-7%
31.4
-16%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

两个立体声扬声器的音量非常大，整体音质也非常好，尤其是对于商务电脑而言。这两个模块只是缺乏活力，因此我们建议使用耳机或外置扬声器来欣赏大音量的音乐和电影。会议等场合的语音清晰度也非常不错。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.134.52528.832.23132.629.94038.436.35026.929.26325.825.28021.423.810019.227.71251936.51601743.220017.955.525017.861.331516.267.840014.168.650013.269.463012.871.480013.170.7100013.370.9125012.274.316001272.7200011.474.2250012.472.631501472.5400012.469500012.966.9630014.965.380001368.21000013.166.1125001364.11600012.562.2SPL25.383.2N0.757.8median 13.1median 68.2Delta1.66.721.120.221.125.424.725.42925.72923.420.123.436.329.536.348.818.148.860.613.160.666.116.466.16622.56664.614.564.663.911.663.970.312.170.375.411.575.479.610.679.677.91077.974.69.274.679.510.179.579.710.279.777.510.277.576.610.576.674.910.774.972.611.172.676.912.376.968.712.168.777.413.277.482.31882.389.617.689.69120.9918516.28575.812.175.8942694103.60.7103.6median 76.9median 12.1median 76.94.32.84.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAHuawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 明亮的显示屏会耗费电池寿命

耗电量

配备 120 Hz 显示屏的 EliteBook 845 G10 比 SureView 显示屏更经济，但也比低功耗的 1080p 面板耗电更多。在负载情况下会出现一些问题，因为 65 瓦的电源由于高功率限制而不断达到极限，在这种情况下无法为电池充电。对于 HS 处理器来说，90 瓦的电源会是更好的选择。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.36 / 0.71 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.3 / 10.1 / 11.2 Watt
Load midlight 64.4 / 66.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2560x1600, 14"		Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N, LTPS IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14"		Dell Latitude 7440
i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV, IPS, 2560x1600, 14"		Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, , IPS, 3120x2080, 14.2"		SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"		HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
R9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 1920x1200, 14"		Average AMD Radeon 780M
 		Average of class Office
 
Power Consumption
44%
19%
8%
-38%
-23%
-4%
17%
Idle Minimum *
4.3
2.2
49%
4.5
-5%
4.1
5%
7.5
-74%
6.4
-49%
6.11 ?(2.7 - 14, n=51)
-42%
4.46 ?(2 - 13.8, n=93, last 2 years)
-4%
Idle Average *
10.1
4.4
56%
6.5
36%
6.6
35%
10.4
-3%
12.4
-23%
8.32 ?(4.7 - 17.6, n=51)
18%
7.42 ?(3 - 14.9, n=93, last 2 years)
27%
Idle Maximum *
11.2
5.1
54%
7.3
35%
8
29%
11.4
-2%
18
-61%
10.6 ?(5.2 - 27, n=51)
5%
8.9 ?(4.89 - 18.6, n=93, last 2 years)
21%
Load Average *
64.4
33.3
48%
52.5
18%
61
5%
83.3
-29%
63
2%
56.1 ?(19.7 - 93.2, n=50)
13%
42 ?(8.7 - 77.9, n=88, last 2 years)
35%
Witcher 3 ultra *
59.4
40.1
32%
46.2
22%
56
6%
92.7
-56%
63.6
-7%
Load Maximum *
66.7
48.5
27%
63
6%
90
-35%
110.3
-65%
68
-2%
74.9 ?(34.9 - 111.8, n=51)
-12%
61.6 ?(11.1 - 107, n=93, last 2 years)
8%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø59.4 (57.3-61.8)
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø65.7 (64-66.7)
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø6.65 (5.67-8.82)

Power consumption with an external monitor

05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø59 (56.8-66.7)
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø62 (57.3-66.7)
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø17 (16.1-23.5)
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø58.7 (56.8-66.6)
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø52.1 (47.8-58.7)
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø6.31 (5.43-8.31)

电池寿命

惠普安装了一块相对较小的 51 Wh 电池，再加上高分辨率面板，只能保证一般的运行时间。在亮度为 150 cd/m²（相当于我们测试设备最大亮度的 45%）时，我们的视频测试持续了 9 个多小时，WLAN 测试持续了近 8 个小时。相比之下，最大亮度下的 WLAN 测试仅持续了 5 个多小时。如果你觉得不够，就应该选择低功耗显示屏的配置。在设备打开的情况下，充满电需要 2 小时，但大约 34 分钟后，50% 的电量已经可用。

51 Wh 电池
51 Wh 电池
充电曲线
充电曲线
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 115)
7h 51min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 115)
5h 10min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 17min
Load (maximum brightness)
0h 56min
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA
R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M, 51 Wh		Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M, 57 Wh		Dell Latitude 7440
i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 57 Wh		Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh		SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh		HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
R9 PRO 6950HS, Radeon 680M, 51 Wh		Average of class Office
 
Battery Runtime
108%
130%
46%
57%
30%
56%
H.264
557
527
-5%
666
20%
716 ?(348 - 1501, n=32, last 2 years)
29%
WiFi v1.3
471
718
52%
781
66%
580
23%
607
29%
560
19%
608 ?(230 - 1349, n=93, last 2 years)
29%
Load
56
148
164%
164
193%
124
121%
124
121%
79
41%
117.4 ?(56 - 218, n=56, last 2 years)
110%
Reader / Idle
1427
1292
1234 ?(130 - 2296, n=19, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 稳定而高质量的机箱
+ 采用 P3 色彩空间的 120 Hz 显示屏
+ 极高的 CPU 性能
+ 出色的键盘
+ 集成 5G 模块，USB 4
+ 良好的维护选项
+ 500 万像素网络摄像头

Cons

- 测试设备只有单通道内存
- 风扇启动很快
- 没有 SD 读卡器
- 高分辨率显示屏缩短了电池寿命
- 电源尺寸小

评语：惠普 EliteBook 845 G10 是最佳商务笔记本电脑之一

回顾。HP EliteBook 845 G10。测试设备由提供：
回顾。HP EliteBook 845 G10。测试设备由提供：

EliteBook 845 G10 并不是惠普的旗舰商务笔记本电脑（而是 EliteBook 1040 G10；不久后将进行评测），但凭借其快速的 AMD 处理器、坚固的铝制外壳和出色的键盘，它无疑是目前最好的商务设备之一。除了显示屏盖子稍显灵活外，它的做工非常出色，CPU 性能也很高。从理论上讲，这款笔记本电脑在图形性能方面与英特尔竞争对手相比具有明显优势，但在我们的测试设备中，由于内存采用单通道配置，这一优势被抵消了。我们认为，很多 EliteBook 用户并不需要超过 32GB 的内存，因此，对于绝大多数用户来说，2x 16GB 的配置无疑更有意义。

其他优势还包括广泛的安全功能、良好的维护选项、丰富的端口选择（包括 USB 4）以及广泛的服务和保修选项。EliteBook 在显示屏方面也毫不逊色，因为高分辨率 120 Hz 屏幕可提供出色的图像质量，不会出现 PWM 闪烁，而且校准效果也很好。不过，与普通 1080p 版本的 400 cd/m² 相比，该面板需要更多电量。

惠普在 EliteBook 845 G10 中做了很多正确的事情，提供了配备 AMD 处理器的最佳商务笔记本，同时也是有史以来最好的商务机型之一。

全新 Ryzen 9 Pro 7940HS的 CPU 性能非常稳定，但我们认为采用 U 系列芯片的机型（如 Ryzen 7 Pro 7840U）会是 EliteBook 845 G10 的更好选择，因为它的散热和风扇过于活跃。

虽然我们的测试设备是最昂贵的机型之一，但由于采用了 AMD 处理器，EliteBook 845 G10 的廉价版也是一个有趣的选择。搭载 Ryzen Pro 5 和低功耗 1080p 显示屏的机型售价已略高于 1000 欧元，而搭载 7840U 的机型起价约为 1500 欧元（这些机型目前似乎还未在美国上市）。不过，我们建议不要选配 SureView 显示屏。

在竞争产品中，我们对新款 ThinkPad T14s G4 尤为好奇，不久我们还将关注更昂贵的 EliteBook 1040 G4。如果你需要更强的图形处理能力，你应该看看 申克 Vision 14配备了 RTX 3050 Ti.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

EliteBook 845 G10 基础版在惠普美国网络商城的售价为2,007.00 美元。用户有许多配置选项，如处理器、内存和显示屏等。

HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA - 08/14/2023 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
91 / 98 → 93%
Keyboard
96%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
69 / 80 → 86%
Weight
69 / 20-75 → 90%
Battery
80%
Display
88%
Games Performance
63 / 78 → 80%
Application Performance
95 / 95 → 100%
Temperature
86%
Noise
93%
Audio
82%
Camera
51 / 85 → 60%
Average
81%
90%
Office - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA (EliteBook 845 G10 Series)
Review
•
惠普EliteBook 845 G10评测：凭借 AMD R...
|
Review
•
使用新驱动程序测试 AMD Radeon 780M 和 76...

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普EliteBook 845 G10评测：配备 AMD Zen4 的近乎完美的商务笔记本电脑
Andreas Osthoff, 2023-08-15 (Update: 2023-08-15)