Notebookcheck Logo

惠普 EliteBook Folio G1 亚笔记本电脑简短评测

不只是一件电子产品?! 惠普也推出了被动散热商务笔记本电脑，EliteBook Folio G1是一台轻盈纤薄的12.5寸设备。不出意料的是，它的性能并不出众，这个小巧亚笔记本电脑可以胜任工作环境的需要吗？
Business Laptop / Notebook Skylake Ultrabook Windows
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA (EliteBook Folio Series)
Processor
Intel Core m5-6Y54 2 x 1.1 - 2.7 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 515, Core: 900 MHz
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR3-1866, 双通道, 板载, 无插槽
Display
12.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 176 PPI, AUO226D, IPS, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Skylake-Y Premium PCH
Storage
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, 256 GB 
Soundcard
Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Connections
2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合耳机接口
Networking
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 12.4 x 292 x 209
Battery
38 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 惠普长效 4 芯, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 11.5 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 高清摄像头，为Windows Hello搭配的红外摄像头
Additional features
Speakers: 四个高品质立体声扬声器, Bang & Olufsen, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 45瓦电源适配器，说明书, 惠普工具软件, Foxit Phantom PDF, Intel WiDi, 36 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
979 g, Power Supply: 285 g
Price
1520 Euro
Links
HP homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

❌
337 mm 234.5 mm 15.8 mm 1.4 kg333 mm 229 mm 16.5 mm 1.2 kg324 mm 226 mm 12.3 mm 1.2 kg304 mm 200 mm 18.5 mm 1.2 kg305 mm 211 mm 14.3 mm 1.2 kg292 mm 209 mm 12.4 mm 979 g280.5 mm 196.5 mm 13.1 mm 927 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Front: no ports
Front: no ports
Right side: 2x USB 3.1 Type-C (Gen. 2) with Thunderbolt support
Right side: 2x USB 3.1 Type-C (Gen. 2) with Thunderbolt support
Left side: 3.5 mm stereo jack
Left side: 3.5 mm stereo jack
Rear: no ports
Rear: no ports
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m 512KB
Dell Latitude 13 7370
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
634 MBit/s 0%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
631 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 512KB
Dell Latitude 13 7370
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
466 MBit/s +14%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
407 MBit/s
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Broadcom 802.11ac
570 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Broadcom 802.11ac
397 MBit/s

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

300
cd/m²		301
cd/m²		291
cd/m²
307
cd/m²		289
cd/m²		286
cd/m²
310
cd/m²		318
cd/m²		276
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AUO226D tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 318 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 297.6 cd/m² Minimum: 17 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 291 cd/m²
Contrast: 1070:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.82 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.84 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
64.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.03% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
45.96% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
44.45% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
12.5", 1920x1080, IPS		Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
12", 2304x1440, IPS		Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
13.3", 3200x1800, IPS		Dell Latitude 13 7370
13.3", 1920x1080, IPS		Dell XPS 13-9350
13.3", 1920x1080, IPS		Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS
14", 1920x1080, IPS		HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
14", 2560x1440, IPS
Display
48%
32%
18%
1%
30%
51%
Display P3 Coverage
44.45
66.8
50%
59.1
33%
52.2
17%
44.53
0%
58.9
33%
67.9
53%
sRGB Coverage
65.2
95.4
46%
85.5
31%
78.3
20%
66.8
2%
83.1
27%
96.8
48%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
45.96
68
48%
61
33%
53.9
17%
45.97
0%
60.3
31%
70
52%
Response Times
-28%
-16%
-49%
-32%
-28%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
32 ?(14.8, 17.2)
41.2 ?(15.6, 25.6)
-29%
38 ?(24, 14, Spikes in between)
-19%
50.4 ?(20.4, 30)
-58%
47.2 ?(18.8, 28.4)
-48%
46.4 ?(16.4, 30)
-45%
Response Time Black / White *
24 ?(12.4, 11.6)
30.4 ?(6.8, 23.6)
-27%
27 ?(13, 14, Spikes in between)
-13%
33.6 ?(13.2, 20.4)
-40%
27.6 ?(4.4, 23.2)
-15%
26.4 ?(6.8, 19.6)
-10%
PWM Frequency
1429 ?(20)
Screen
24%
0%
-2%
5%
14%
9%
Brightness middle
289
387
34%
390
35%
261
-10%
277.5
-4%
321.7
11%
327
13%
Brightness
298
358
20%
352
18%
241
-19%
276
-7%
301
1%
316
6%
Brightness Distribution
87
88
1%
81
-7%
85
-2%
88
1%
89
2%
87
0%
Black Level *
0.27
0.47
-74%
0.69
-156%
0.26
4%
0.191
29%
0.294
-9%
0.35
-30%
Contrast
1070
823
-23%
565
-47%
1004
-6%
1453
36%
1094
2%
934
-13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.82
1.6
67%
3.04
37%
4.3
11%
4.88
-1%
3.96
18%
4.39
9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.73
4
63%
7.01
35%
8.66
19%
6.69
38%
7.27
32%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.84
1
74%
2.88
25%
5.82
-52%
4.26
-11%
3.15
18%
4.69
-22%
Gamma
2.41 91%
2.26 97%
2.43 91%
2.44 90%
2.59 85%
2.34 94%
2.15 102%
CCT
6492 100%
6680 97%
6848 95%
6771 96%
6562 99%
7082 92%
7101 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
42.03
61.6
47%
55
31%
49.18
17%
41.6
-1%
53.8
28%
62.52
49%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
64.8
82.2
27%
85
31%
77.84
20%
65.79
2%
82.7
28%
96.71
49%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
15% / 22%
5% / 4%
-11% / -4%
3% / 4%
4% / 11%
11% / 13%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.4 ms rise
↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.8 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).
LatencyMon with wireless modules turned off
LatencyMon with wireless modules turned off
LatencyMon with wireless modules turned on
LatencyMon with wireless modules turned on
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
Intel Core i5-6300U
124 Points +12%
Dell XPS 13-9350
Intel Core i5-6200U
116 Points +5%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel Core m5-6Y54
111 Points
Dell Latitude 13 7370
Intel Core m5-6Y57
101 Points -9%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel Core m7-6Y75
100 Points -10%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
91 Points -18%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
90 Points -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS
Intel Core i5-6300U
91 Points -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
Intel Core i5-6300U
303 Points +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS
Intel Core i5-6300U
301 Points +20%
Dell XPS 13-9350
Intel Core i5-6200U
287 Points +15%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel Core m5-6Y54
250 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
218 Points -13%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel Core m7-6Y75
214 Points -14%
Dell Latitude 13 7370
Intel Core m5-6Y57
180 Points -28%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
111 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
250 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
35.98 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Help
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
HD Graphics 520, 16384, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
3305 Points +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS
HD Graphics 520, 8192, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
3237 Points +7%
Dell Latitude 13 7370
HD Graphics 515, 8192, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
3048 Points 0%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
HD Graphics 515, 8192, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
3037 Points
Dell XPS 13-9350
HD Graphics 520, 8192, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D
2983 Points -2%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
HD Graphics 515, 8192, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
2614 Points -14%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 8192, Apple SSD AP0256
2550 Points -16%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
HD Graphics 520, 16384, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4058 Points +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS
HD Graphics 520, 8192, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
3989 Points +16%
Dell XPS 13-9350
HD Graphics 520, 8192, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D
3658 Points +7%
Dell Latitude 13 7370
HD Graphics 515, 8192, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
3528 Points +3%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
HD Graphics 515, 8192, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
3430 Points
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
HD Graphics 515, 8192, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
3298 Points -4%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
HD Graphics 520, 16384, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4241 Points +2%
Dell Latitude 13 7370
HD Graphics 515, 8192, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
4238 Points +2%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
HD Graphics 515, 8192, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4146 Points
Dell XPS 13-9350
HD Graphics 520, 8192, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D
4078 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS
HD Graphics 520, 8192, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
3944 Points -5%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 8192, Apple SSD AP0256
3550 Points -14%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
HD Graphics 515, 8192, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
3472 Points -16%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3037 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3430 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4146 points
Help
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2		Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Apple SSD AP0256		Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2		Dell Latitude 13 7370
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7		Dell XPS 13-9350
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D		Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2		HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-62%
-46%
-6%
-27%
12%
22%
Read Seq
1482
754
-49%
475.2
-68%
1354
-9%
1097
-26%
1720
16%
1649
11%
Write Seq
1232
638
-48%
423.7
-66%
1132
-8%
307.7
-75%
1263
3%
1265
3%
Read 4k
46.96
14.6
-69%
28.57
-39%
42.13
-10%
38.52
-18%
49.65
6%
53.3
14%
Write 4k
100.7
20.5
-80%
90.7
-10%
105.8
5%
113
12%
123
22%
159.9
59%
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
AS SSD
hddimg
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Sequential Read: 1482 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1232 MB/s
512K Read: 1191 MB/s
512K Write: 1220 MB/s
4K Read: 46.96 MB/s
4K Write: 100.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 464 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 292.1 MB/s
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance
Dell XPS 13-9350
Intel HD Graphics 520
1558 Points +15%
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
Intel HD Graphics 520
1539 Points +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS
Intel HD Graphics 520
1396 Points +3%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel HD Graphics 515
1360 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515
1277 Points -6%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel HD Graphics 515
1188 Points -13%
Dell Latitude 13 7370
Intel HD Graphics 515
1094 Points -20%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell XPS 13-9350
Intel HD Graphics 520
1398 Points +11%
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
Intel HD Graphics 520
1377 Points +10%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel HD Graphics 515
1254 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS
Intel HD Graphics 520
1227 Points -2%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515
1186 Points -5%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel HD Graphics 515
1083 Points -14%
Dell Latitude 13 7370
Intel HD Graphics 515
992 Points -21%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score
Dell XPS 13-9350
Intel HD Graphics 520
5931 Points +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS
Intel HD Graphics 520
5659 Points +8%
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
Intel HD Graphics 520
5471 Points +4%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel HD Graphics 515
5257 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515
4446 Points -15%
Dell Latitude 13 7370
Intel HD Graphics 515
3481 Points -34%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel HD Graphics 515
3434 Points -35%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell XPS 13-9350
Intel HD Graphics 520
7966 Points +13%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel HD Graphics 515
7035 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS
Intel HD Graphics 520
7031 Points 0%
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
Intel HD Graphics 520
6708 Points -5%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515
6078 Points -14%
Dell Latitude 13 7370
Intel HD Graphics 515
4658 Points -34%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel HD Graphics 515
4286 Points -39%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score
Dell XPS 13-9350
Intel HD Graphics 520
861 Points +10%
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
Intel HD Graphics 520
842 Points +8%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel HD Graphics 515
780 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS
Intel HD Graphics 520
772 Points -1%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515
682 Points -13%
Dell Latitude 13 7370
Intel HD Graphics 515
509 Points -35%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel HD Graphics 515
464 Points -41%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell XPS 13-9350
Intel HD Graphics 520
929 Points +10%
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
Intel HD Graphics 520
900 Points +7%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel HD Graphics 515
844 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS
Intel HD Graphics 520
826 Points -2%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515
735 Points -13%
Dell Latitude 13 7370
Intel HD Graphics 515
565 Points -33%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel HD Graphics 515
507 Points -40%
3DMark 11 Performance
1360 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5257 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
780 points
Help
lowmed.highultra
Tomb Raider (2013) 54.4 22.8 15.9
BioShock Infinite (2013) 49.9 24.8 15.3
The Witcher 3 (2015) 12.8
Max. Load
 35.7 °C42.7 °C40.3 °C 
 33.6 °C33.6 °C35.2 °C 
 32.1 °C29.7 °C32.8 °C 
Maximum: 42.7 °C
Average: 35.1 °C
41.9 °C45.8 °C37.3 °C
37.9 °C39.3 °C35.3 °C
33.8 °C30.9 °C33 °C
Maximum: 45.8 °C
Average: 37.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  37.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Fluke 62 Max
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.8 °C / 91 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-4.5 °C / -8.1 F).
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
6Y54, HD Graphics 515		Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
6Y30, HD Graphics 515		Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
6Y75, HD Graphics 515		Dell Latitude 13 7370
6Y57, HD Graphics 515		Dell XPS 13-9350
6200U, HD Graphics 520		Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS
6300U, HD Graphics 520		HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
6300U, HD Graphics 520
Heat
4%
16%
-1%
1%
11%
1%
Maximum Upper Side *
42.7
39
9%
39.1
8%
43.2
-1%
45.2
-6%
40
6%
43.2
-1%
Maximum Bottom *
45.8
44
4%
38.7
16%
50.8
-11%
45.2
1%
42.8
7%
47.1
-3%
Idle Upper Side *
32.1
32
-0%
26
19%
30.5
5%
30.4
5%
26.6
17%
30.5
5%
Idle Bottom *
32.3
32
1%
25.7
20%
31.2
3%
31.2
3%
27.4
15%
31.5
2%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 1.5 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.3 / 6 / 6.4 Watt
Load midlight 22.7 / 31.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 1920x1080		Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 2304x1440		Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
6Y75, HD Graphics 515, 3200x1800		Dell Latitude 13 7370
6Y57, HD Graphics 515, 1920x1080		Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS
6300U, HD Graphics 520, 1920x1080		HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
6300U, HD Graphics 520, 2560x1440
Power Consumption
23%
-4%
-4%
-36%
-54%
Idle Minimum *
4.3
2.7
37%
4.2
2%
5
-16%
7.6
-77%
6.3
-47%
Idle Average *
6
2.7
55%
8.4
-40%
7.5
-25%
9
-50%
9.4
-57%
Idle Maximum *
6.4
7.2
-13%
8.9
-39%
8
-25%
9.6
-50%
10.1
-58%
Load Average *
22.7
22
3%
15.9
30%
15.3
33%
24.5
-8%
33.3
-47%
Load Maximum *
31.2
20.5
34%
22.5
28%
26.8
14%
30.3
3%
49.5
-59%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
8h 46min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
5h 55min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6h 53min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 32min
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
38 Wh		Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
41.4 Wh		Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
45 Wh		Dell Latitude 13 7370
34 Wh		Dell XPS 13-9350
56 Wh		Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS
52 Wh		HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
45.6 Wh
Battery Runtime
39%
32%
7%
25%
15%
-11%
Reader / Idle
526
1013
93%
588
12%
782
49%
776
48%
530
1%
H.264
413
512
24%
418
1%
391
-5%
339
-18%
WiFi v1.3
355
501
41%
402
13%
367
3%
451
27%
411
16%
309
-13%
Load
152
231
52%
182
20%
176
16%
150
-1%
123
-19%
131
-14%

Pros

+ 小巧轻盈
+ 坚固的机身
+ 出色的键盘
+ 优秀的全高清屏幕，无闪烁
+ 不错的扬声器
+ 安静的运行
+ 高速无线网络
+ 为Windows Hello搭配的红外摄像头
+ 三年质保

Cons

- 转轴不够稳定
- 点击触控版使用中存在问题
- 在持续负载下性能下降
- 接口非常有限
- 没有提供USB-A转接器
- 无Kensington锁口
- 作为商务设备安全功能有限
In review: HP EliteBook Folio G1. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.
In review: HP EliteBook Folio G1. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.

我们在评测开始时提出了惠普EliteBook Folio G1究竟能否适应办公需要的问题。在实际使用两周之后，我们可以肯定地回答：是。它有足够的系统性能，优秀的屏幕和可以适应长时间打字的出色键盘来证明自己。

这样一台紧凑的被动散热设备显然并能适应所有的用户。相比尺寸更大的商务设备它显然会受到不少限制，从接口数量、安全功能到持续负载下的性能。这台轻巧设备的被动散热很快就会达到极限。不过它的性能完全可以满足日常办公应用的需要。

整体上，我们对这台设备的整体表现十分满意，但是EliteBook Folio G1还不完美。它出色的机身受到了较弱的转轴的影响。它只提供了三个接口，而重要的USB-A转接器也没有附带。它在功耗上也还有改进的空间。缺少安全锁对于一些用户来说也会是个致命的问题。

惠普EliteBook Folio G1是一台非常优秀的设备，不过你需要注意它的弱点。如果你正在寻找一台超便携设备，需要安静的运行和出色的键盘的话，毫无疑问它将是你最佳的选择。

和竞争对手的比较并不简单，因为它们在我们测试中都得到了不错的分数，同时价位也十分相近。因此你必须十分清楚自己需要的是什么。我们首先将会对比两台最小巧的设备，EliteBook Folio G1和MacBook 12。如果你主要需要一台个人设备，那么Apple的这台笔记本电脑提供了更好的屏幕，更好的触控板和更长的电池续航。EliteBook Folio G1搭配的磨砂屏幕、可选拓展坞以及更优秀的键盘则更加适合工作。惠普同时提供了三年质保，因此它的性价比更高一筹。

主动散热式的商务设备通常更厚重，但提供了更多的接口和更强的性能，特别是在持续负载下。如果你需要一台尽可能便携、安静的设备的话，那么Folio G1将是个不错的选择。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。 

HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA - 06/09/2016 v5.1 (old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
91 /  98 → 93%
Keyboard
92%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
56 / 80 → 71%
Weight
75 / 35-78 → 93%
Battery
88%
Display
88%
Games Performance
55 / 68 → 80%
Application Performance
80 / 87 → 92%
Temperature
89 / 91 → 98%
Noise
100%
Audio
86 / 91 → 95%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Average
79%
90%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普 EliteBook Folio G1 亚笔记本电脑简短评测
Andreas Osthoff, 2016-06-25 (Update: 2024-11- 4)