惠普Envy 14笔记本电脑评测。成功的全能型选手

Name: HP Envy 14-eb0252ng
Brand: HP

明亮的16:10显示。

在低于1000欧元（约995美元）的价格范围内，要找到一台拥有明亮显示屏的笔记本电脑并不容易。惠普的光滑和紧凑的Envy 14是少数例外之一。继续阅读，看看这款14英寸设备还能做什么。

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 08/29/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Intel Laptop / Notebook Tiger Lake

这并不是我们第一次评测惠普Envy 14。我们能够看一下eb0010nr模型，它配备了一个GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q和16GB的内存。以更低的价格（起价700欧元（约合696美元）），我们在此评测的eb0252ng型号也是可用的；它没有专用显卡，只配备8GB内存，但作为回报，它继承了1920x1200像素的16:10格式的IPS显示屏（尽管它是哑光的，而不是光面的，并且不支持触摸）。考虑到这个价格，1TB的固态硬盘容量也不差。按照目前的惯例，Windows 11 Home作为操作系统。

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Envy 14-eb0252ng (Envy 14 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-1135G7 4 x 2.4 - 4.2 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-UP3

Graphics adapter

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Core: 1300 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, DDR4, 30.0.101.1660

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4 onboard

Display

14.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 162 PPI, BOE0929, IPS, WUXGA, glossy: no, 60 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP

Storage

Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, 1024 GB

, M.2 NVMe SSD

Soundcard

Intel Tiger Point-LP PCH - cAVS

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: combined (headset/mic), Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 17.9 x 313 x 224

Battery

63.3 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4 cells

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: HD 720p

Additional features

Speakers: 2.0 Bang , Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 90 W power adapter, HP Command Center, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.458 kg, Power Supply: 300 g

Price

699 EUR

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Envy 14的竞争对手包括其他价格不太高的14英寸设备，比如最近评测的华硕ZenBook 14 UM425U或联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6.后者的笔记本电脑作为对比产品出现在表格中。

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
85.6 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2022	HP Envy 14-eb0252ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	1.5 kg	17.9 mm	14.00"	1920x1200
86.5 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2021	HP Envy 14-eb0010nr i5-1135G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	1.6 kg	17.9 mm	14.00"	1920x1200
82.6 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2022	Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U R7 5700U, Vega 8	1.2 kg	15.3 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
85.5 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2021	Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 R5 5600U, Vega 7	1.5 kg	17.9 mm	14.00"	2240x1400

由于外壳与更昂贵的兄弟姐妹机型相同，我们不会在这篇文章中重新评估外壳、连接和输入设备。你可以在现有的（较早的）评论中找到相应的信息评论.

尺寸比较

Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U HP Envy 14-eb0010nr HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years)	102.2 MB/s +83%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U (AV PRO V60)	77 MB/s +38%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB)	75.9 MB/s +36%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	67 MB/s +20%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7	56 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years)	142.9 MB/s +72%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	87 MB/s +5%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB)	85.3 MB/s +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U (AV PRO V60)	84 MB/s +1%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	83 MB/s

沟通

Networking - iperf3 receive AXE11000
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1706 (1694^min - 1719^max) MBit/s
Average of class Multimedia (709 - 1789, n=78, last 2 years)	1451 MBit/s -15%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (390 - 1734, n=77)	1413 MBit/s -17%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	722 (712^min - 732^max) MBit/s -58%

HP Envy 14-eb0252ng; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1705 (1694-1719)

网络摄像头

ColorChecker HP Envy 14-eb0252ng: 7.97 ∆E min: 3.08 - max: 16.78 ∆E

显示

正如最初提到的，显示屏不是光面触摸模式；而是哑光面板。除了对反射的敏感度较低外，在直接比较中，它还具有其他优势。


436 cd/m²	447 cd/m²	432 cd/m²
436 cd/m²	451 cd/m²	423 cd/m²
435 cd/m²	458 cd/m²	435 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE0929 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 458 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 439.2 cd/m² Minimum: 30 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 451 cd/m²
Contrast: 1455:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.46 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.32
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
70.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Envy 14-eb0252ng BOE0929, IPS, 1920x1200, 14"	HP Envy 14-eb0010nr AU Optronics AUOF392, IPS, 1920x1200, 14"	Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U CMN N140HCE-EN2, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 LEN140WUXGA+, IPS, 2240x1400, 14"
Display		7%	-5%	4%
Display P3 Coverage	69.3	77.1 11%	63.8 -8%	72.2 4%
sRGB Coverage	98.5	99.8 1%	96.1 -2%	99.5 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	70.4	76.7 9%	65.9 -6%	74.3 6%
Response Times		-90%	23%	-44%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	44.9 ?(20.4, 24.5)	61.2 ?(30, 31.2) -36%	32.9 ?(15.3, 17.6) 27%	45.2 ?(22.8, 22.4) -1%
Response Time Black / White *	18.9 ?(8, 10.9)	46 ?(24, 22) -143%	15.4 ?(5.5, 9.9) 19%	35.2 ?(20.4, 14.8) -86%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-1%	-14%	-15%
Brightness middle	451	412 -9%	466 3%	310.6 -31%
Brightness	439	392 -11%	434 -1%	302 -31%
Brightness Distribution	92	81 -12%	86 -7%	92 0%
Black Level *	0.31	0.32 -3%	0.39 -26%	0.22 29%
Contrast	1455	1288 -11%	1195 -18%	1412 -3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.46	1.88 24%	2.76 -12%	2.67 -9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.24	3.06 28%	7.97 -88%	4.54 -7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.32	1.96 -48%	0.56 58%	2.33 -77%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.5	2.2 37%	4.7 -34%	3.7 -6%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.1 ^105%	2.128 ^103%	2.12 ^104%
CCT	7289 ^89%	6650 ^98%	7284 ^89%	6398 ^102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		68.7
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		99.8
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-28% / -12%	1% / -7%	-18% / -15%

* ... smaller is better

首先是亮度。由于平均亮度为439cd/m²，而不是392cd/m²，我们的评测样品大大地更适合户外使用。由于黑色水平非常相似（0.31对0.32cd/m²），也有更高的对比度。1,455:1而不是1,288:1是一个非常好的IPS显示屏的比率。

响应时间也有利于非触摸版本。另一方面，当涉及到色彩空间和色彩准确性时，触摸版的得分略高，尽管价格较低的型号在这里仍然表现良好。

我们没有观察到任何闪烁或明显的屏幕渗漏。可视角度处于典型的IPS水平，这意味着它们是好的。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
18.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8 ms rise
18.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20.4 ms rise
44.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 24.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

业绩

Envy 14-eb0252ng拥有8GB内存、1000GB固态硬盘和四核处理器，在性能上舒适地定位在入门级和中端之间。虽然存储驱动器可以在必要时更换，但焊接的、不可扩展的内存会受到批评（关键词：长期可持续性）。

测试条件

用户可以在惠普整齐排列的命令中心调整系统控制，以及其他事项。从截图中可以看出，有4种设备模式，其中3种配备了额外的滑块。我们的测量是基于出厂设置的，这意味着使用的是 "平衡 "模式。当然，在使用其他模式时，确定的结果可能有所不同。

处理器

就像触摸版一样，低价位的Envy 14配备了酷睿i5-1135G7来自英特尔的Tiger Lake ，这已经不是很新了。这款10纳米的芯片，规定TDP为12至28瓦，提供8MB的L3缓存，4个核心，它可以通过超线程处理多达8个线程的并行运算。在我们的基准测试过程中，没有任何惊喜。CPU的性能与1135G7的平均值一致。Tiger Lake ，在与竞争对手的AMD芯片的竞争中，该机型没有机会。Ryzen 5 5600U和Ryzen 7 5700U的冲刺部分都明显远离，这主要得益于更高的核心数量（分别为6和8）。尽管如此，i5-1135G7完全可以满足典型的日常应用，如办公、视频、网络和轻度到中度多任务处理。

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø809 (788.07-898.13)

HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø919 (891.54-924.6)

Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U: Ø1318 (1287.58-1432.51)

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U: Ø1525 (1479.45-1545.71)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia	86.4 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 ^-2! AMD Ryzen 5 5600U	62.2 pt
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	54.4 pt
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	48.8 pt
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7	44.7 pt
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7	43.5 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=103, last 2 years)	15500 Points +179%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U	9345 (8734.61^min - 9345.18^max) Points +68%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	8392 Points +51%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	6136 (5867.5^min - 6136.37^max) Points +10%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7	5553 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (2786 - 6136, n=55)	4724 Points -15%
Single Core
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=94, last 2 years)	1769 Points +31%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7	1349 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U	1345 Points 0%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	1337 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (1062 - 1373, n=53)	1322 Points -2%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	1267 Points -6%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years)	5687 Points +166%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U	3632 Points +70%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	3144 Points +47%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	2382 Points +11%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7	2139 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (979 - 2382, n=62)	1827 Points -15%
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years)	651 Points +25%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U	533 Points +3%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7	519 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (375 - 527, n=62)	507 Points -2%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	503 Points -3%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	492 Points -5%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=94, last 2 years)	2445 Points +172%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U	1546 (1479.45^min - 1545.71^max) Points +72%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	1433 (1287.58^min - 1432.51^max) Points +60%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	925 (891.54^min - 924.6^max) Points +3%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7	898 (788.07^min - 898.13^max) Points
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (431 - 941, n=65)	792 Points -12%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years)	258 Points +34%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U	220 Points +14%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	198 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (141.4 - 205, n=61)	194.4 Points +1%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7	193 Points
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	187.1 Points -3%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (499 - 1044, n=60)	662 Seconds * -15%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7	574 Seconds *
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	499 Seconds * +13%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	366 Seconds * +36%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U	328 Seconds * +43%
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years)	253 Seconds * +56%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years)	60219 MIPS +162%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U	43071 MIPS +87%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	39989 MIPS +74%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	24188 MIPS +5%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7	22973 MIPS
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (14745 - 24873, n=62)	21407 MIPS -7%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years)	5716 MIPS +23%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U	5248 MIPS +13%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	4694 MIPS +1%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (3924 - 4921, n=62)	4674 MIPS 0%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7	4655 MIPS
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	4513 MIPS -3%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years)	12061 Points +167%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	6249 Points +38%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	4695 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (3475 - 5472, n=58)	4663 Points +3%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7	4522 Points
Single-Core
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=87, last 2 years)	1826 Points +35%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	1406 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (1147 - 1428, n=58)	1373 Points +2%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7	1349 Points
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	1175 Points -13%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years)	16.4 fps +146%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U	11.8 fps +77%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	9.35 fps +40%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	7.6 fps +14%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7	6.68 fps
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (3.57 - 7.6, n=57)	5.93 fps -11%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7	62.9 s *
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	61.6 s * +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U	54.6 s * +13%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (44.2 - 62.9, n=60)	52.8 s * +16%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	49.6 s * +21%
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years)	49.2 s * +22%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7	0.658 sec *
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (0.619 - 0.727, n=59)	0.642 sec * +2%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	0.634 sec * +4%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	0.598 sec * +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U	0.549 sec * +17%
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years)	0.4845 sec * +26%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

898 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

85.3 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

193 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

2139 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

519 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1349 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

5553 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Average of class Multimedia	95.1 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U, Vega 7	77.1 pt
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	74.1 pt
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7	45.8 pt
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	42.2 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years)	14392 KRay/s +110%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U, Vega 7	10892 KRay/s +59%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	10585 KRay/s +55%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	6840 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (4313 - 7952, n=45)	6445 KRay/s -6%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years)	72601 Points +158%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U, Vega 7	69193 Points +146%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	58803 Points +109%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	28174 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (19402 - 32283, n=45)	26975 Points -4%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years)	3385 MB/s +82%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U, Vega 7	2359 MB/s +27%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	1934 MB/s +4%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	1860 MB/s
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (1316 - 2172, n=45)	1832 MB/s -2%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years)	90675 Points +124%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	87287 Points +116%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U, Vega 7	77176 Points +91%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (39000 - 46951, n=45)	45742 Points +13%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	40411 Points

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	12537 Points +224%
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years)	9325 Points +141%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U, Vega 7	9215 Points +138%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (3497 - 4445, n=45)	4218 Points +9%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	3870 Points

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U, Vega 7	38158 Points +131%
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years)	36124 Points +119%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	30928 Points +87%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	16520 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (12569 - 19635, n=45)	16302 Points -1%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U, Vega 7	92244 MB/s +141%
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years)	75931 MB/s +99%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (28988 - 67977, n=45)	58975 MB/s +54%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	58805 MB/s +54%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	38239 MB/s

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years)	934 MB/s +197%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	639 MB/s +103%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U, Vega 7	597 MB/s +90%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	315 MB/s
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (265 - 373, n=51)	289 MB/s -8%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years)	7814 KRay/s +123%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	5732 KRay/s +64%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U, Vega 7	5644 KRay/s +61%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	3505 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (2226 - 4291, n=45)	3424 KRay/s -2%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years)	40793 MPixel/s +140%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (9004 - 45366, n=45)	23085 MPixel/s +36%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	18819 MPixel/s +11%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	16979 MPixel/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U, Vega 7	14481 MPixel/s -15%

系统性能

虽然这款笔记本电脑在实际运行中非常流畅，反应灵敏，但在系统测试时，它只能在比较领域中排在最后。尽管如此，对于一个轻薄的14英寸设备来说，PCMark 10的4635分仍然是可敬的。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)	6789 Points +46%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 Vega 7, R5 5600U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	5667 Points +22%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	5410 Points +17%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U Vega 8, R7 5700U, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N	5370 Points +16%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	4635 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (4026 - 4952, n=53)	4613 Points 0%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years)	10515 Points +16%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 Vega 7, R5 5600U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	10299 Points +13%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (8149 - 9917, n=53)	9310 Points +2%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U Vega 8, R7 5700U, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N	9250 Points +2%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	9088 Points
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	9036 Points -1%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years)	8919 Points +53%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	8342 Points +43%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U Vega 8, R7 5700U, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N	8063 Points +38%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 Vega 7, R5 5600U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	7982 Points +37%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (5040 - 6619, n=53)	6218 Points +6%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	5845 Points

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years)	9194 Points +81%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 Vega 7, R5 5600U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	6010 Points +18%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	5701 Points +12%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U Vega 8, R7 5700U, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N	5635 Points +11%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	5088 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (3548 - 5255, n=53)	4612 Points -9%

PCMark 10 Score		4635 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years)	69078 MB/s +116%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (17443 - 63889, n=45)	36640 MB/s +14%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	36069 MB/s +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U, Vega 7	34432 MB/s +7%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	32040 MB/s

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years)	70185 MB/s +82%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	44106 MB/s +14%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (19716 - 63705, n=45)	40897 MB/s +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U, Vega 7	39456 MB/s +2%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	38577 MB/s

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years)	70291 MB/s +81%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (18722 - 66778, n=45)	41742 MB/s +8%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	38781 MB/s
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	35314 MB/s -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U, Vega 7	34343 MB/s -11%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	112.1 ns * -33%
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years)	107 ns * -27%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U, Vega 7	93.7 ns * -11%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	84.4 ns *
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (68.3 - 107, n=51)	72.5 ns * +14%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

正如其他许多笔记本电脑不幸的情况一样，Envy 14也有一些延迟问题。根据LatencyMon工具，惠普设备对于实时音频和视频编辑并不理想。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	3848.5 μs *
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	3239 μs * +16%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U Vega 8, R7 5700U, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N	1238.6 μs * +68%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 Vega 7, R5 5600U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	1064 μs * +72%

* ... smaller is better

储存

东芝的内置1TB固态硬盘在测试中没有显示出任何问题。NVMe模型提供了超过体面的性能率，没有完全利用该技术的能力。Envy 14的M.2驱动器在长时间的负载下没有出现性能下降的问题。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3297 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3069 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 426.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 382 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2359 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1943 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 51.83 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 136.9 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia	92.8 pt
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	66.3 pt
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N	66 pt
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	65 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	58.1 pt
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	55.8 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Average of class Multimedia (1629 - 4861, n=76, last 2 years)	2979 MB/s +27%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	2354 (2334.76^min - 2354.26^max) MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	2330 (2285.43^min - 2330.4^max) MB/s -1%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (2161 - 2354, n=5)	2239 MB/s -5%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N	2087 (2067.31^min - 2087.49^max) MB/s -11%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	1874 (1863.32^min - 1874.22^max) MB/s -20%
seq write
Average of class Multimedia (463 - 5711, n=76, last 2 years)	3127 MB/s +71%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	2438 (2391.76^min - 2437.57^max) MB/s +34%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	1926 (1895.18^min - 1925.89^max) MB/s +5%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (1811 - 1983, n=5)	1863 MB/s +2%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N	1862 (1771.86^min - 1862.06^max) MB/s +2%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	1826 (1798.7^min - 1826.11^max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 read
Average of class Multimedia (2132 - 7126, n=76, last 2 years)	5465 MB/s +66%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N	3587 (3167.16^min - 3587.22^max) MB/s +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	3437 (3084.28^min - 3437.02^max) MB/s +5%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	3379 (3093.19^min - 3379.09^max) MB/s +3%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (3257 - 3316, n=5)	3291 MB/s 0%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	3283 (2874.15^min - 3283.24^max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 write
Average of class Multimedia (555 - 6898, n=76, last 2 years)	4195 MB/s +37%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	3062 (2978.92^min - 3062.22^max) MB/s
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (3024 - 3065, n=5)	3051 MB/s 0%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N	2846 (2612.19^min - 2846.46^max) MB/s -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	2711 (2607.15^min - 2711.38^max) MB/s -11%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	2342 (2272.54^min - 2342.38^max) MB/s -24%
4k q1 t1 read
Average of class Multimedia (14.6 - 97.7, n=76, last 2 years)	63.4 MB/s +27%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N	55.4 (55.14^min - 55.41^max) MB/s +11%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (45.7 - 52.9, n=5)	50.6 MB/s +1%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	50 (49.67^min - 50.03^max) MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	45.2 (44.78^min - 45.17^max) MB/s -10%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	35.4 (35.31^min - 35.41^max) MB/s -29%
4k q1 t1 write
Average of class Multimedia (69.4 - 378, n=76, last 2 years)	172 MB/s +46%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N	129.9 (128.76^min - 129.91^max) MB/s +10%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (114 - 143, n=5)	129.4 MB/s +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	127 (125.46^min - 127.1^max) MB/s +8%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	118.1 (117.07^min - 118.08^max) MB/s
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	84 (79.02^min - 83.98^max) MB/s -29%
4k q32 t16 read
Average of class Multimedia (295 - 4881, n=76, last 2 years)	1407 MB/s +176%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	1197 (1178.4^min - 1196.88^max) MB/s +135%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (509 - 1167, n=5)	934 MB/s +83%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N	881 (824.97^min - 881.36^max) MB/s +73%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	601 (599.59^min - 601.19^max) MB/s +18%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	509 (486.65^min - 508.69^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Average of class Multimedia (192.1 - 4074, n=76, last 2 years)	1059 MB/s +203%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	503 (457.14^min - 502.76^max) MB/s +44%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (350 - 514, n=5)	442 MB/s +26%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	426 (410.25^min - 425.93^max) MB/s +22%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N	390 (362.19^min - 389.5^max) MB/s +11%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	350 (313.36^min - 350.25^max) MB/s

AS SSD
Score Total
Average of class Multimedia (2033 - 9972, n=73, last 2 years)	5101 Points +31%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	3883 Points
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (3297 - 4568, n=8)	3776 Points -3%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N	3689 Points -5%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	3674 Points -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	2922 Points -25%
Score Read
Average of class Multimedia (669 - 3501, n=73, last 2 years)	1646 Points +20%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (1210 - 1801, n=8)	1386 Points +1%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	1369 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	1349 Points -1%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	1212 Points -11%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N	1138 Points -17%
Score Write
Average of class Multimedia (656 - 4813, n=73, last 2 years)	2674 Points +43%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N	2017 Points +8%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	1869 Points
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	1864 Points 0%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (1406 - 1869, n=8)	1718 Points -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	948 Points -49%
Seq Read
Average of class Multimedia (1718 - 5730, n=73, last 2 years)	4257 MB/s +60%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	2874 MB/s +8%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N	2724.11 MB/s +3%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	2654.83 MB/s
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (1287 - 2762, n=8)	2385 MB/s -10%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	2127 MB/s -20%
Seq Write
Average of class Multimedia (414 - 5651, n=73, last 2 years)	2791 MB/s +106%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N	1517.46 MB/s +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	1491 MB/s +10%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (1257 - 2493, n=8)	1491 MB/s +10%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	1427 MB/s +5%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	1355.65 MB/s
4K Read
Average of class Multimedia (28.7 - 98.5, n=73, last 2 years)	62 MB/s +27%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	52.5 MB/s +8%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	48.68 MB/s
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N	48.47 MB/s 0%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (42.6 - 52.1, n=8)	47.9 MB/s -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	39.28 MB/s -19%
4K Write
Average of class Multimedia (66.5 - 328, n=73, last 2 years)	190.9 MB/s +53%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (98.3 - 158, n=8)	129.5 MB/s +4%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	124.47 MB/s
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	122.9 MB/s -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	122.2 MB/s -2%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N	120.62 MB/s -3%
4K-64 Read
Average of class Multimedia (350 - 2989, n=73, last 2 years)	1158 MB/s +10%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (896 - 1473, n=8)	1099 MB/s +4%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	1055.28 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	1022 MB/s -3%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	947 MB/s -10%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N	817.56 MB/s -23%
4K-64 Write
Average of class Multimedia (411 - 4265, n=73, last 2 years)	2204 MB/s +37%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N	1744.88 MB/s +8%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	1609.19 MB/s
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	1598 MB/s -1%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (1142 - 1609, n=8)	1440 MB/s -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	677 MB/s -58%
Access Time Read
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	0.079 ms * -55%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	0.072 ms * -41%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (0.039 - 0.094, n=8)	0.05788 ms * -13%
Average of class Multimedia (0.018 - 0.15, n=73, last 2 years)	0.05499 ms * -8%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N	0.051 ms * -0%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	0.051 ms *
Access Time Write
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	0.091 ms * -184%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	0.09 ms * -181%
Average of class Multimedia (0.013 - 0.414, n=73, last 2 years)	0.06101 ms * -91%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (0.027 - 0.039, n=8)	0.03213 ms * -0%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	0.032 ms *
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N	0.031 ms * +3%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

HP Envy 14-eb0252ng: Ø3272 (2974.1-3291.77)

图形卡

与触摸版不同，价格较低的兄弟姐妹没有专门的显卡。这款Iris Xe Graphics G7支持DirectX 12，在1135G7的情况下提供80个EUs。图形基准测试与CPU测试的情况相同。性能与到目前为止使用该GPU的所有设备大致相当。AMD竞争对手的Radeon芯片平均取得略好的结果。由于采用了GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q，更昂贵的Envy 14的速度是其两倍以上。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia	100 pt
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i5-1135G7	63.4 pt
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	30 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5600U	29.2 pt
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	27.6 pt
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	26.5 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=78, last 2 years)	20510 Points +298%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i5-1135G7	11055 Points +115%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	5908 Points +15%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5600U	5338 Points +4%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (2246 - 6477, n=109)	5179 Points +1%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	5150 Points

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (14679 - 130614, n=38, last 2 years)	56887 Points +168%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i5-1135G7	51846 Points +144%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5600U	27164 Points +28%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	26102 Points +23%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (6361 - 30894, n=95)	21885 Points +3%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	21266 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (1835 - 46022, n=81, last 2 years)	14739 Points +335%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i5-1135G7	8131 Points +140%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1560 - 5305, n=111)	3794 Points +12%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	3685 Points +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5600U	3404 Points 0%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	3388 Points
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (622 - 17620, n=82, last 2 years)	5566 Points +391%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i5-1135G7	2982 Points +163%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (561 - 1511, n=108)	1172 Points +3%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	1134 Points 0%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	1134 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5600U	1100 Points -3%

3DMark 11 Performance		5354 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		73098 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		16080 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		2969 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		1275 points
Help

... in comparison

游戏性能

最好远离现代游戏。我们测试的2022年的几个游戏不是崩溃就是产生图形错误（典型的英特尔iGPU问题；AMD和Nvidia的图形驱动往往更好）。但是，当游戏运行没有问题时，即使在最小的细节下，帧率通常也很差，不可能得到一个流畅的图像。最多，带有80个EU的Iris Xe Graphics G7是为较老和要求不高的游戏准备的。你甚至有时可以选择中高设置，只要你愿意在必要时降低分辨率。

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Multimedia (36 - 428, n=46, last 2 years)	211 fps +219%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	156.8 (144^min) fps +137%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	70.7 (64^min) fps +7%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	66.2 (57^min) fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (30.2 - 97.4, n=101)	65.4 fps -1%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	59.8 (50^min) fps -10%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Multimedia (23 - 327, n=39, last 2 years)	142.9 fps +255%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	90 (83^min) fps +123%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (21.8 - 56.9, n=103)	41.9 fps +4%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	40.3 (33^min) fps
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	39.6 (32^min) fps -2%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Multimedia (11.2 - 290, n=73, last 2 years)	101.2 fps +424%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	53.6 (50^min) fps +178%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	22.6 (20^min) fps +17%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (9.3 - 33.5, n=101)	21.6 fps +12%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	19.3 (9^min) fps
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	18.1 (15^min) fps -6%

至少Envy 14不需要处理性能波动的问题。我们在60分钟的巫师3》测试在帧速率的稳定性方面顺利完成。

The Witcher 3 FPS diagram

HP Envy 14-eb0252ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs: Ø11 (10-13)

Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U R7 5700U, Vega 8: Ø13.5 (10-15)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	74.6	59	16.2
The Witcher 3 (2015)	66.2	40.3	19.3	10.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	103.6	70.2	41.9	39.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	28.8	14.2	9.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	46.8	34	31.6
Strange Brigade (2018)	68.1	26.5	22.4
Rainbow Six Extraction (2022)	0 game wont start (crash)	0 game wont start (crash)	0 game wont start (crash)
Dying Light 2 (2022)	11.3	9.5	8.5
Elex 2 (2022)	15 severe graphical problems	13 severe graphical problems	11 severe graphical problems
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022)	13.5	13.3	13.2
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	20.7	0 ()	0 ()
Vampire Bloodhunt (2022)	41.7	25	23.2
The Quarry (2022)	11.5	8.4	5.4

排放

噪声排放

几乎在同一时间评测的华硕ZenBook 14，在噪音发展方面赢得了很多批评，但Envy 14在这方面的表现要好得多。虽然风扇在空闲状态下有时会启动（没有明显的原因），但惠普笔记本电脑在负载时要安静得多。在某些情况下，45至47分贝(A)的噪音可能会令人讨厌，而Envy 14只产生了32至36分贝(A)，这表明冷却系统工作良好。因此，重视低噪音水平的用户可能会对这款14英寸的设备感到满意。

Noise Level

Idle		26 / 27 / 31 dB(A)
Load		32 / 36 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 26 dB(A)

	HP Envy 14-eb0252ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	HP Envy 14-eb0010nr i5-1135G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U R7 5700U, Vega 8	Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 R5 5600U, Vega 7
Noise		-4%	-15%	3%
off / environment *	26	25.9 -0%	26 -0%	24.6 5%
Idle Minimum *	26	26 -0%	26 -0%	24.6 5%
Idle Average *	27	26 4%	27 -0%	24.6 9%
Idle Maximum *	31	26 16%	32 -3%	25.1 19%
Load Average *	32	34.9 -9%	45 -41%	29.6 7%
Witcher 3 ultra *	33	34.5 -5%	43 -30%	31.9 3%
Load Maximum *	36	48.7 -35%	47 -31%	45.5 -26%

* ... smaller is better

温度

同样地，温度也没有理由抱怨。在使用FurMark和Prime95工具满负荷工作60分钟后，最高温度为41°C（约106°F）（顶部）和43°C（约109°F）（底部），这绝对是可以忍受的，特别是由于手掌部位的温度没有超过33°C（约91°F）。机箱在空闲状态下通常保持在30°C（约86°F）以下。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


41 °C	39 °C	37 °C
41 °C	37 °C	30 °C
33 °C	33 °C	29 °C

Maximum: 41 °C
Average: 35.6 °C


38 °C	43 °C	41 °C
32 °C	40 °C	40 °C
30 °C	34 °C	36 °C

Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 37.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 43 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


28 °C	29 °C	28 °C
29 °C	28 °C	27 °C
28 °C	27 °C	27 °C

Maximum: 29 °C
Average: 27.9 °C


28 °C	29 °C	29 °C
28 °C	28 °C	30 °C
27 °C	28 °C	29 °C

Maximum: 30 °C
Average: 28.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 26 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


38 °C	36 °C	33 °C
39 °C	35 °C	30 °C
34 °C	31 °C	29 °C

Maximum: 39 °C
Average: 33.9 °C


35 °C	39 °C	39 °C
29 °C	38 °C	38 °C
29 °C	34 °C	36 °C

Maximum: 39 °C
Average: 35.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-5.2 °C / -9.4 F).

	HP Envy 14-eb0252ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	HP Envy 14-eb0010nr i5-1135G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U R7 5700U, Vega 8	Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 R5 5600U, Vega 7
Heat		-11%	-7%	10%
Maximum Upper Side *	41	41.2 -0%	46 -12%	35.8 13%
Maximum Bottom *	43	45.6 -6%	49 -14%	42.8 -0%
Idle Upper Side *	29	31.8 -10%	30 -3%	25 14%
Idle Bottom *	30	37.8 -26%	29 3%	26.2 13%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

这些组件也没有达到临界值。上面提到的压力测试导致酷睿i5-1135G7的最高温度为80℃（约176°F），平均温度略低于60℃（约140°C）（数据由工具HWMonitor提供）。尽管体积小，但在我们的TheWitcher 3测试中，只达到了最高62℃（约144°F）和平均约50℃（约122°F）。

发言人

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

HP Envy 14-eb0252ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理

功耗给我们留下了复杂的感觉。虽然4到9瓦的空闲功耗很出色，但相对于可用的性能而言，Envy 14在负载情况下的最大功耗为87瓦，相对较高。难怪惠普在这台14英寸设备中包含一个90瓦的电源适配器。竞争对手的笔记本电脑中的（更快的）AMD CPU在这里做得更好。

能源消耗

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	1.2 / Watt
Idle	4 / 5 / 9 Watt
Load	35 / 87 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP Envy 14-eb0252ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	HP Envy 14-eb0010nr i5-1135G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U R7 5700U, Vega 8	Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 R5 5600U, Vega 7	Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	Average of class Multimedia
Power Consumption		-100%	-19%	-5%	-7%	-75%
Idle Minimum *	4	4.2 -5%	6 -50%	3.8 5%	4.48 ?(2.3 - 15.8, n=105) -12%	6.54 ?(2.1 - 21.1, n=88, last 2 years) -64%
Idle Average *	5	18.3 -266%	8 -60%	6.9 -38%	7.37 ?(3.5 - 16.8, n=105) -47%	11.3 ?(4.6 - 30, n=88, last 2 years) -126%
Idle Maximum *	9	19.2 -113%	10 -11%	8.8 2%	9.24 ?(4.5 - 17, n=105) -3%	13.3 ?(5.6 - 30.4, n=88, last 2 years) -48%
Load Average *	35	72.9 -108%	41 -17%	42.2 -21%	36.4 ?(14.3 - 70, n=103) -4%	70.7 ?(14.3 - 147, n=86, last 2 years) -102%
Witcher 3 ultra *	38.7	61.5 -59%	43.6 -13%	37.7 3%
Load Maximum *	87	127.8 -47%	53 39%	68.4 21%	61.7 ?(24.2 - 149, n=105) 29%	116.1 ?(47.7 - 270, n=88, last 2 years) -33%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption during The Witcher 3 / Stress test

HP Envy 14-eb0252ng; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø38.7 (33.9-61.2)

HP Envy 14-eb0252ng; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø47.6 (47-48.6)

Energy consumption with an external monitor

HP Envy 14-eb0252ng; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø45 (40.4-77.4)

HP Envy 14-eb0252ng; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø52.2 (41.8-56.6)

HP Envy 14-eb0252ng; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø41.5 (32.5-63.8)

HP Envy 14-eb0252ng; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø32 (30-49.9)

电池寿命

在电池寿命方面没有什么可抱怨的。在我们的Wi-Fi测试中，在亮度降低到150cd/m²的情况下，大约13个小时是一个非常便携的系统的标志，在长时间的旅行中也能削减一个很好的数字。这个出色的速度只有华硕ZenBook 14（约14:30小时）超过了。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing

13h 12min

	HP Envy 14-eb0252ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 63.3 Wh	HP Envy 14-eb0010nr i5-1135G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, 63.3 Wh	Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U R7 5700U, Vega 8, 67 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 R5 5600U, Vega 7, 57 Wh	Average of class Multimedia
Battery Runtime		-18%	11%	-31%	-19%
WiFi v1.3	792	649 -18%	876 11%	550 -31%	640 ?(279 - 1204, n=88, last 2 years) -19%
Reader / Idle		1661		1298	1168 ?(612 - 2760, n=17, last 2 years)
Load		90		60	97.1 ?(39 - 212, n=65, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 适度的温度和噪音发展

+ 明亮的16:10显示屏

+ 电池寿命长

+ 有吸引力的设计

+ 霹雳火4

Cons

- 键盘布局需要一些时间来适应

- 焊接的内存（不可扩展）

- 糟糕的网络摄像头

判决书

Envy 14-eb0252ng是我们没有发现任何明显缺点的少数笔记本电脑之一（除了弱的网络摄像头）。

这款14英寸的笔记本电脑在几乎所有类别中都获得了良好到非常好的分数。

惠普笔记本电脑最大的亮点是慷慨的电池寿命，适度的噪音发展，以及明亮和高对比度的IPS面板，其16：10的长宽比也很突出。结合紧凑和相对较轻的底盘（1.5公斤），Envy 14注定是一个可以舒适运输的移动伴侣，同时也不回避户外使用。

那些不追求高图形性能，而只是想寻找一个平衡的全能选手的用户可以毫不犹豫地购买这款笔记本电脑。

总的来说，Envy 14-eb0252ng的评级与以下产品相当联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6.的华硕ZenBook 14 UM425U由于负载下的高排放量，不能完全跟上。

价格和可用性

在撰写本文时，我们的惠普Envy 14评测机的配置（Core i5-1135G7，8GB内存，1TB SSD）似乎在美国没有供应。然而，惠普的在线商店有配备酷睿i7的机型作为替代。你还可以关注亚马逊看看该设备是否在这里有售。

HP Envy 14-eb0252ng - 08/23/2022 v7 ^(old)
Florian Glaser

Chassis

81 / 98 → 83%

Keyboard

81%

Pointing Device

78%

Connectivity

64 / 80 → 80%

Weight

70 / 20-72 → 95%

Battery

90 / 95 → 94%

Display

90%

Games Performance

64 / 90 → 71%

Application Performance

91 / 90 → 100%

Temperature

89%

Noise

91 / 95 → 95%

Audio

84%

Camera

39 / 85 → 45%

Average

78%

86%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Stephanie Chamberlain - Translator - 571 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 470341 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普Envy 14笔记本电脑评测。成功的全能型选手

Florian Glaser, 2022-08-29 (Update: 2022-08-29)

潜在的竞争对手比较

尺寸比较

沟通

网络摄像头

显示

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

业绩

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

系统性能

DPC延迟

储存

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

The Witcher 3 FPS diagram

排放

噪声排放

温度

压力测试

发言人

HP Envy 14-eb0252ng audio analysis

Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U audio analysis

能源管理

能源消耗

Energy consumption during The Witcher 3 / Stress test

Energy consumption with an external monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

判决书

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison