华硕ZenBook 14 UM425U笔记本电脑回顾。AMD和英特尔之间的对决
在评测了搭载酷睿i7-1165G7的ZenBook 14之后酷睿i7-1165G7从英特尔的Tiger Lake 代前一段时间,我们现在审查了一个版本,基于AMD的有前途的 Ryzen 7 5700U.我们的UM425UA测试模型,目前价格略高于600欧元(约598美元),只有8GB内存,但它的8个CPU核心对于这样一个紧凑的机箱来说肯定令人印象深刻。其他功能包括一个512GB NVMe SSD和一个哑光全高清面板。
竞争者包括价格范围低于1000欧元(约996美元)的其他14英寸笔记本电脑,如HP Envy 14-eb0252ng和 联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6虽然它们配备了16:10而非16:9的面板。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.6 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U R7 5700U, Vega 8 | 1.2 kg | 15.3 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
84.2 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2020 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 13.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
85.6 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
85.5 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 R5 5600U, Vega 7 | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 2240x1400 |
除了端口(AMD的变体必须没有Thunderbolt)、"内部颜色 "和键盘语言,机箱的构造与已经评测过的ZenBook 14 UX425EA相同。因此,我们不会在本文中讨论更多关于机箱、端口和输入设备的细节。你可以在以下文章中找到相应的信息 链接的评论.
SD卡阅读器
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 (AV PRO V60) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 (AV PRO V60) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
沟通
网络摄像头
显示
与英特尔模型一样,AMD版配备了具有1920x1080像素的哑光60赫兹面板。根据我们的测量,我们的评测样品以明显的高亮度脱颖而出。AMD机型的平均亮度为371 cd/m²,而不是434 cd/m²,这对IPS面板来说是一个非常好的价值,也使ZenBook 14非常适用于户外使用。
|
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 466 cd/m²
Contrast: 1195:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.76 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.56
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
65.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.128
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U CMN N140HCE-EN2, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA AU Optronics B140HAN06.8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng BOE0929, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 LEN140WUXGA+, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 5% | 6% | 10% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 63.8 | 68.6 8% | 69.3 9% | 72.2 13% |
sRGB Coverage | 96.1 | 98.3 2% | 98.5 2% | 99.5 4% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.9 | 69.8 6% | 70.4 7% | 74.3 13% |
Response Times | -61% | -30% | -83% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 32.9 ? | 49.6 ? -51% | 44.9 ? -36% | 45.2 ? -37% |
Response Time Black / White * | 15.4 ? | 26.4 ? -71% | 18.9 ? -23% | 35.2 ? -129% |
PWM Frequency | ||||
Screen | -11% | -0% | -27% | |
Brightness middle | 466 | 375.1 -20% | 451 -3% | 310.6 -33% |
Brightness | 434 | 371 -15% | 439 1% | 302 -30% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 91 6% | 92 7% | 92 7% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.34 13% | 0.31 21% | 0.22 44% |
Contrast | 1195 | 1103 -8% | 1455 22% | 1412 18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.76 | 1.79 35% | 2.46 11% | 2.67 3% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.97 | 3.05 62% | 4.24 47% | 4.54 43% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.56 | 1.79 -220% | 1.32 -136% | 2.33 -316% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 2.3 51% | 3.5 26% | 3.7 21% |
Gamma | 2.128 103% | 2.29 96% | 2.24 98% | 2.12 104% |
CCT | 7284 89% | 6405 101% | 7289 89% | 6398 102% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.9 | |||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98.8 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -22% /
-14% | -8% /
-3% | -33% /
-27% |
* ... smaller is better
与英特尔的同类产品相比,响应时间也更好,尽管你不应该在这里期待任何顶级速率。另一方面,由于黑色水平稍差,对比度处于非常相似的水平(0.39比0.34cd/m²);几乎1,200:1的比率对这个价格来说是合适的。色彩空间的情况也是如此。这两台设备几乎100%地再现了sRGB色域。
说到色彩准确性,英特尔版本的面板在开箱后略微领先。然而,经过校准后,AMD型号的显示器更准确一些。
一般来说,ZenBook没有受到强烈的背光出血或PWM闪烁的影响。总的来说,图像质量是比较令人满意的。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
15.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.5 ms rise | |
↘ 9.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
32.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.3 ms rise | |
↘ 17.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8734 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
业绩
由于CPU的高核心数,尽管TDP较低,但我们的评测样本仍处于中端水平。这使得ZenBook 14成为不同使用情况下的理想全能型产品,只要你不期望有高的GPU性能,并满足于8GB的内存(不幸的是,它是焊接的,不能扩展)。
测试条件
预装的程序MyAsus允许用户调整各种系统设置。这些设置包括电池行为、风扇控制、麦克风和扬声器设置以及图像再现。我们的测试大多没有进行任何调整。我们只在风扇模式下切换到性能配置,因为一些3D应用程序在使用标准配置时往往会崩溃(在我们的测试中,设备在几分钟后就直接关闭了)。 Witcher 3测试).
处理器
正如最初提到的,Ryzen 7 5700U是一个八核型号,由于SMT的存在,它可以并行处理多达16个线程。作为比较。酷睿i7-1165G7不得不使用4个核心和8个线程--而且其TDP略高(标准:28瓦对25瓦)。因此,AMD版本在基准测试过程中得分很高。例如,配备英特尔CPU的ZenBook 14在Cinebench R15循环中的表现明显优于它。该酷睿i5-1135G7在惠普Envy 14中也明显被击败。当比较Ryzen 7 5700U和Ryzen 5 5600U比较Ryzen 7 5700U和联想IdeaPad 5 Pro中的Ryzen 5600U,很明显前者的表现甚至更好。然而,当考虑到所有的速率时,AMD ZenBook的方向是迄今为止确定的5700U的平均水平。
Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test
CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 -2! | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA -2! | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (5798 - 12346, n=18) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (45926 - 69580, n=18) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (1103 - 2231, n=18) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (57016 - 99178, n=18) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (6837 - 14169, n=18) | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (24053 - 36523, n=18) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (34176 - 64646, n=18) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (513 - 776, n=18) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (3247 - 6784, n=18) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (6903 - 25066, n=18) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 |
系统性能
当涉及到系统性能时,华硕笔记本电脑在对比设备中舒适地排名中游。在PCMark 10中的5370分对于一台紧凑的14英寸笔记本电脑来说是一个非常坚实的分数。我们还发现该系统很流畅,反应迅速。
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (4775 - 5518, n=13) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (8347 - 10091, n=13) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (7001 - 8457, n=13) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (4583 - 5964, n=13) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA |
PCMark 10 Score | 5370 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (15867 - 39326, n=18) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (17632 - 47190, n=18) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=78, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (11554 - 47048, n=18) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (84.9 - 113, n=18) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
当涉及到延迟时,情况并不完全理想。例如,尽管ZenBook 14比惠普Envy 14好得多,但LatencyMon工具在涉及实时音频和视频编辑时仍然显示出局限性。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA |
* ... smaller is better
储存
我们没有观察到存储方面的任何问题。虽然内置的512GB SK Hynix固态硬盘并不是最快的NVMe型号之一,但ZenBook 14在存储基准中表现非常好,通常能击败竞争对手的固态硬盘。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Average SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
ǞǞǞ融入处理器的Radeon RX Vega 8集成在处理器中的Radeon RX Vega 8处理图像再现。DirectX 12模型提供512个着色器,根据我们的GPU基准测试,它的位置在英特尔Iris Xe Graphics G7之间,它具有 80和 96个EUs分别。与CPU一样,GPU的性能也符合预期的平均水平。
3DMark 11 Performance | 6025 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 106622 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 21698 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3356 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1292 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
ZenBook 14并不打算用于高要求的3D应用。虽然如果使用中等或高设置,RX Vega 8通常可以处理旧游戏,但在玩更现代的游戏时,你往往不得不满足于最低的细节,前提是集成GPU甚至能够在1920x1080的原生分辨率下产生流畅的帧率。
The Witcher 3 | |
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Average of class Multimedia (23 - 327, n=40, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (19.6 - 55.2, n=35) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Average of class Multimedia (11.2 - 290, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (8.7 - 26.8, n=46) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (7.07 - 17.6, n=49) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
在我们用TheWitcher 3 进行的60分钟耐力测试中,没有出现性能下降或类似情况,而且帧率保持相当稳定。
The Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 93.6 | 82.5 | 25.6 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 59.8 | 39.6 | 18.1 | 13.2 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 95.5 | 76 | 47.8 | 44.7 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 32.2 | 15.6 | 9.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 36.9 | 31.4 | 26.6 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 75.8 | 30.3 | 25.5 | |
Vampire Bloodhunt (2022) | 42.3 | 27 | 24 | |
The Quarry (2022) | 19.3 | 12.8 | 9.8 |
排放
噪声排放
ZenBook 14的最大缺点之一是风扇控制,或者说是风扇行为。虽然这台14英寸的笔记本在最佳情况下是安静的,但在空闲模式和简单的活动中,如与办公任务、视频和网络浏览有关的活动中,冷却系统偶尔会变得不必要的响亮--而且不仅是在性能模式下,有时在标准或耳语模式下也会如此。在负载情况下,华硕笔记本电脑的声音也比测试领域的其他产品要大,最大为47 dB(A)。因此,对噪音敏感的用户可能要寻找一个不同的设备。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 26 / 27 / 32 dB(A) |
Load |
| 45 / 47 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 26 dB(A) |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U R7 5700U, Vega 8 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 R5 5600U, Vega 7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 1% | 11% | 15% | |
off / environment * | 26 | 29.8 -15% | 26 -0% | 24.6 5% |
Idle Minimum * | 26 | 29.9 -15% | 26 -0% | 24.6 5% |
Idle Average * | 27 | 31 -15% | 27 -0% | 24.6 9% |
Idle Maximum * | 32 | 31 3% | 31 3% | 25.1 22% |
Load Average * | 45 | 35.6 21% | 32 29% | 29.6 34% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43 | 37.4 13% | 33 23% | 31.9 26% |
Load Maximum * | 47 | 40.8 13% | 36 23% | 45.5 3% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
就温度而言,AMD ZenBook也排在最后,尽管这里的差异不太明显,而且掌托区从来没有出现不舒服的温度。整个机箱在闲置时保持令人愉快的凉爽,温度在27°C(约81°F)至30°C(约86°F)。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4.2 °C / -7.6 F).
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U R7 5700U, Vega 8 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 R5 5600U, Vega 7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 6% | 6% | 16% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 46 | 41 11% | 41 11% | 35.8 22% |
Maximum Bottom * | 49 | 44.4 9% | 43 12% | 42.8 13% |
Idle Upper Side * | 30 | 28 7% | 29 3% | 25 17% |
Idle Bottom * | 29 | 29.8 -3% | 30 -3% | 26.2 10% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
根据HWMonitor工具,当系统处于满负荷状态时,Ryzen 7 5700U的最高温度为78℃(约172°F),平均温度为60℃(约140°F)至70℃(约158°F),这些数值根本不是关键。另一方面,在我们的TheWitcher 3测试中,CPU节流到1.4GHz左右,这有点遗憾。
发言人
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
能源消耗
当设备插入时,包括在性能模式下,耗电量通常比竞争对手高一些。然而,6至10瓦的空闲消耗对于一台全能型笔记本电脑来说是相当低的,这是使电池寿命良好的东西。考虑到负载下的最大消耗为53瓦,令人愉快的65瓦电源适配器提供了足够的容量。
Off / Standby | 0.1 / Watt |
Idle | 6 / 8 / 10 Watt |
Load |
41 / 53 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U R7 5700U, Vega 8 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 R5 5600U, Vega 7 | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 19% | 7% | 8% | -57% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6 | 4.8 20% | 4 33% | 3.8 37% | 6.77 ? -13% |
Idle Average * | 8 | 6.5 19% | 5 37% | 6.9 14% | 11.3 ? -41% |
Idle Maximum * | 10 | 7.7 23% | 9 10% | 8.8 12% | 13.4 ? -34% |
Load Average * | 41 | 29.6 28% | 35 15% | 42.2 -3% | 71.3 ? -74% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.6 | 28.6 34% | 38.7 11% | 37.7 14% | |
Load Maximum * | 53 | 57.8 -9% | 87 -64% | 68.4 -29% | 118.1 ? -123% |
* ... smaller is better
Energy consumption during The Witcher 3 / Stress test
Energy consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
ZenBook 14的绝对亮点是它的长电池寿命。在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,67Wh的电池在亮度降低到150cd/m²和风扇配置文件设置为标准的情况下,可以管理近14:30小时--这是一个优秀的结果,在比较领域的任何竞争对手都无法超越的。
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U R7 5700U, Vega 8, 67 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 67 Wh | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 63.3 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 R5 5600U, Vega 7, 57 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -10% | -10% | -37% | -29% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 876 | 786 -10% | 792 -10% | 550 -37% | 624 ? -29% |
Reader / Idle | 1554 | 1298 | 1168 ? | ||
Load | 194 | 60 | 97.8 ? |
Pros
Cons
判决书
经常旅行并正在寻找便携式笔记本电脑的用户在华硕ZenBook 14上找到了合适的地方。
这款光滑的外壳非常轻(1.2公斤),而且薄得令人吃惊(1.5厘米)。户外使用也很愉快,这要归功于明亮的全高清显示屏,这一点是TN或IPS面板的笔记本电脑很少能做到的。出色的电池寿命也是对这一点的补充。
长时间的旅行对ZenBook 14来说不成问题。
另一个优点是高性能的Ryzen 7 5700U,由于其大量的核心,它经常把英特尔的竞争对手甩在后面。
也就是说,薄型机箱和强大的CPU的组合是以排放为代价的。热量和噪音发展相当高,特别是在负载下。微薄的端口配置和有限的升级选项(焊接的RAM)也使ZenBook 14无法获得更好的评价。
替代笔记本电脑惠普Envy 14-eb0252ng和联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6更重,但它们更安静,也更冷。
价格和可用性
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U
- 08/23/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser